Hi Dave. Really surprised to get this e-mail from you today. LOL
I'm taking it on faith that this didn't come from you. Some dork troll,
not very good, it makes him/her look like a real horse's ass, they
should be ashamed. LMAO Say, isn't this type of thing against the law
now? Maybe you can sue the little dipstick. Hehehe.
From: [email protected](Dave=A0Balderstone) Date: Sat, Oct 23, 2004,
7:29pm (EDT+4) To: [email protected]
Subject: Your vote for rec.woodworking.all-ages
ATTENTION VOTER:
My name is Dave Balderstone. I'm writing because you're guilty of Voter
fraud on a Usenet poll. I want you to reply to me immediately and
confess. While this is not a criminal matter, it makes you look like a
real horse's ass. You should fucking be ashamed of yourself for what you
did.
Dave Balderstone
[email protected]
http://www.balderstone.ca
JOAT
Eagles can soar ... but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
In article <[email protected]>, J T
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Dave. Really surprised to get this e-mail from you today. LOL
> I'm taking it on faith that this didn't come from you. Some dork troll,
> not very good, it makes him/her look like a real horse's ass, they
> should be ashamed. LMAO Say, isn't this type of thing against the law
> now? Maybe you can sue the little dipstick. Hehehe.
I posted about this a couple of hours ago.
Someone's pretending to be me, and not very well at that, apparently
through a European web host.
I have not, and will not, send email to anyone about the recent vote on
rec.woodworking.all-ages.
Period.
Anyone who recieves such a message purporting to be from me is
requested to send me a copy with full headers/raw source.
djb
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:41:22 -0400, [email protected] (J T)
wrote:
> Hi Dave. Really surprised to get this e-mail from you today. LOL
>I'm taking it on faith that this didn't come from you. Some dork troll,
>not very good, it makes him/her look like a real horse's ass, they
>should be ashamed. LMAO Say, isn't this type of thing against the law
>now?
always has been. the problem is enforcement. it has to be prosecuted
in the originating jurisdiction. which is of course hidden....
> Maybe you can sue the little dipstick. Hehehe.