JJ

04/01/2006 3:00 PM

Don't E-mail Me, I'll E-mail You

Got another e-mail today, in response to a post I made. I'll tell
you all yet once again - if you have a reply to a post, then make it in
the appropriate thread, don't e-mail me. ESPECIALLY, don't send me an
e-mail and don't bother stating it's by e-mail only - that's very rude.

There is a small number of people on the group I don't mind e-mails
from. They know who they are. If you're not sure if you're in that
group, chances are you aren't.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax


This topic has 44 replies

DB

Dave Balderstone

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

04/01/2006 9:49 PM

In article <[email protected]>, Mike W.
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry if this sounds like I'm being an ass, Im not. I enjoy your
> posts... but why use your email address if you don't want emails?

It's simple. JOAT wants to be ignored, but hates it when he doesn't get
any attention.

> Do what I do. Betcha can't email me.

He may not be able to, on webtv. Which is probably why he stays with it.

;-)

--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it. "
-- Gene Spafford, 1992

JJ

in reply to Dave Balderstone on 04/01/2006 9:49 PM

05/01/2006 12:08 AM

Wed, Jan 4, 2006, 9:49pm (EST-1) dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_S.balderstone.ca
(Dave=A0Balderstone) stumbles in mumbling:
<snip> He may not be able to, on webtv. Which is probably why he stays
with it.

Nah. It works, I'm cheap, and it's paid for..



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

KC

Kevin Craig

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 2:49 AM

All the other replies so far have been cool, and adressed the subject.

So, let me just say this: JOAT is cool. WebTV sucks. How someone is
able to find and post such great plans, yet be stuck in a sub-par
operating system, escapes me.

Kevin

JJ

in reply to Kevin Craig on 05/01/2006 2:49 AM

05/01/2006 3:07 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 2:49am (EST-1) [email protected] (Kevin=A0Craig) doth
wondereth:
<snip> How someone is able to find and post such great plans, yet be
stuck in a sub-par operating system, escapes me.

Google is my friend. And, the real secret is to look for something
for myself, and all the rest is side effects.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

Od

"Olebiker"

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 5:43 PM


Tom Watson wrote:
> (watson - who is looking forward to the inevitable Robin's Butt
> thread, even though Robin is getting along in years.)

Are you kidding? At my age, she is still a sweet young thing. At my
age Katie Couric is still a sweet young thing.

Dick Durbin

s

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 7:55 PM


Tom Watson wrote:
>
> Lordy, I do love this thread when it pops up again.
>
> It is a sidereal phenomenon and is a precursor to the sure arrival of
> another Robin's Butt thread.
>
> I always enjoy those, too.
>

Tom, Are you referring to Robin Hartyl's butt?

>
> (watson - who is looking forward to the inevitable Robin's Butt
> thread, even though Robin is getting along in years.)
>

I don't mind a little gray haired gal with a perfect behind. Did I
happen to mention that,, I LOVE YOU ROBIN HARTYL !!! PLEEEEEEEEEASE
!!!

Tom in KY, Hey, can you really blame me? PLEEEEEEASE ROBIN, YOU KNOW I
LOVE YOU !!! Just answer 1 phone call and drop the restraining order
and maybe you'll start to love me too! :-)

LB

"Larry Bud"

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

06/01/2006 12:52 PM


J T wrote:
> Got another e-mail today, in response to a post I made. I'll tell
> you all yet once again - if you have a reply to a post, then make it in
> the appropriate thread, don't e-mail me. ESPECIALLY, don't send me an
> e-mail and don't bother stating it's by e-mail only - that's very rude.
>
> There is a small number of people on the group I don't mind e-mails
> from. They know who they are. If you're not sure if you're in that
> group, chances are you aren't.

If you don't want emails, don't use your real email address.

JJ

in reply to "Larry Bud" on 06/01/2006 12:52 PM

06/01/2006 9:24 PM

Fri, Jan 6, 2006, 12:52pm (EST-3) [email protected] (Larry=A0Bud)
doesn't pay attention:
If you don't want emails, don't use your real email address.

But, what would be the enjoyment in that?



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

CF

Chris Friesen

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

04/01/2006 2:59 PM

J T wrote:
> Got another e-mail today, in response to a post I made.

I'll admit publicly that it was me. I did so because I felt my comment
was not strictly on-topic for the group, and dealt specifically with
your posts.

> I'll tell
> you all yet once again - if you have a reply to a post, then make it in
> the appropriate thread, don't e-mail me.

Given that not everyone knows about this preference of yours, perhaps
you might consider putting it in your sig so it shows up on every post?

> ESPECIALLY, don't send me an
> e-mail and don't bother stating it's by e-mail only - that's very rude.

As I mentioned privately, the message headers indicated that it was an
email and not copied to the group.

Chris

JJ

in reply to Chris Friesen on 04/01/2006 2:59 PM

04/01/2006 4:48 PM

Wed, Jan 4, 2006, 2:59pm (EST-1) [email protected] (Chris=A0Friesen)
did spaketh thusly:
I'll admit publicly that it was me. I did so because I felt my comment
was not strictly on-topic for the group, and dealt specifically with
your posts. <snip>

It was in reference to my free plans posts, so I don't see any
reson it couldn't have been replied to in that threat. Sounds on-topic
to me. If you want to post what you said, go ahead.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

DD

"Don D."

in reply to Chris Friesen on 04/01/2006 2:59 PM

04/01/2006 8:37 PM

I kinda like your plans that you post. It pops ideas in my head sometimes,
other times I am senseless.

Don d.


"J T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Wed, Jan 4, 2006, 2:59pm (EST-1) [email protected] (Chris Friesen)
did spaketh thusly:
I'll admit publicly that it was me. I did so because I felt my comment
was not strictly on-topic for the group, and dealt specifically with
your posts. <snip>

It was in reference to my free plans posts, so I don't see any
reson it couldn't have been replied to in that threat. Sounds on-topic
to me. If you want to post what you said, go ahead.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

JJ

in reply to "Don D." on 04/01/2006 8:37 PM

05/01/2006 12:04 AM

Wed, Jan 4, 2006, 8:37pm (EST-2) [email protected] (Don=A0D.) does
sayeth:
I kinda like your plans that you post. It pops ideas in my head
sometimes, other times I am senseless.

Sometimes it helps to wear an alumimum foil cap for that.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

JJ

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 12:51 AM

I almost forgot. Besides having a WebTV, things I do not have,
include:
A cell phone.
An answering machine.
An IPod.or whatever the Hell it is.
A digital camera.
A satellite dish.
A stereo..
Any other of those irritating little gadgets.
A welcome mat.
A guest room.
A portable CD player.
A telephone in my truck.
A suit.
More than one pair of shoes.

And, I don't care.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

dd

"dadiOH"

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 2:43 PM

J T wrote:
> Got another e-mail today, in response to a post I made. I'll
> tell you all yet once again - if you have a reply to a post, then
> make it in the appropriate thread, don't e-mail me.

Considered munging?

--
dadiOH
____________________________

dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
...a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico

JJ

in reply to "dadiOH" on 05/01/2006 2:43 PM

05/01/2006 3:25 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 2:43pm (EST+5) [email protected] (dadiOH) doth
query:
Considered munging?

See my previous reply.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

MW

"Mike W."

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 3:29 AM

Sorry if this sounds like I'm being an ass, Im not. I enjoy your
posts... but why use your email address if you don't want emails?

Do what I do. Betcha can't email me.

Mike W.

J T wrote:
> Got another e-mail today, in response to a post I made. I'll tell
> you all yet once again - if you have a reply to a post, then make it in
> the appropriate thread, don't e-mail me. ESPECIALLY, don't send me an
> e-mail and don't bother stating it's by e-mail only - that's very rude.
>
> There is a small number of people on the group I don't mind e-mails
> from. They know who they are. If you're not sure if you're in that
> group, chances are you aren't.
>
>
>
> JOAT
> You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
> What do you "know"?
> - Granny Weatherwax
>

JJ

in reply to "Mike W." on 05/01/2006 3:29 AM

04/01/2006 11:00 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 3:29am (EST+5) [email protected] (Mike=A0W.)
plaintively queries:
<snip> why use your email address if you don't want emails? <snip>

In case someone has an actual "need" to e-mail me. Say, if they
have a sacrifice for the Woodworking Gods they want to send along.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

Pn

"Pop"

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 11:28 AM

LOL!
---
No, I won't get dressed.
I'm retired!

Pop

"J T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
: I almost forgot. Besides having a WebTV, things I do not
have,
: include:
: A cell phone.
: An answering machine.
: An IPod.or whatever the Hell it is.
: A digital camera.
: A satellite dish.
: A stereo..
: Any other of those irritating little gadgets.
: A welcome mat.
: A guest room.
: A portable CD player.
: A telephone in my truck.
: A suit.
: More than one pair of shoes.
:
: And, I don't care.
:
:
:
: JOAT
: You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
: What do you "know"?
: - Granny Weatherwax
:

JJ

in reply to "Pop" on 05/01/2006 11:28 AM

05/01/2006 3:31 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 11:28am [email protected] (Pop) shocks us
with:
No, I won't get dressed. <snip>

Remind me to never meet you.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

JB

Joe Barta

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 4:06 AM

J T wrote:

> Got another e-mail today, in response to a post I made. I'll
> tell
> you all yet once again - if you have a reply to a post, then make
> it in the appropriate thread, don't e-mail me. ESPECIALLY, don't
> send me an e-mail and don't bother stating it's by e-mail only -
> that's very rude.


Geez dude... it's just an email... get a grip. Long before there was a
WebTV everyone emailed everyone else about whatever the hell they
wanted. This was before "make $5,000 by 5pm" and "double the size of
your unit by 6pm" and "Dr Bungholi from Nigeria seeks your assistance
because he heard you were a man of worthy reputation". Back then we
were just damn happy to hear from people.

So, if someone from the group sends you an email that you're not
interested in dealing with... try this... just delete it :-)

JJ

in reply to Joe Barta on 05/01/2006 4:06 AM

05/01/2006 12:14 AM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 4:06am (EST+5) [email protected] (Joe=A0Barta) doth
adviseth:
<snip> So, if someone from the group sends you an email that you're not
interested in dealing with... try this... just delete it :-)

If I'm in a good mood, that's usually what I do. If I'm in a bad
mood, I often reply.

I also discard about half of the e-mail from my mother also. But,
when I do reply to her, I'm polite.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

MS

"Mortimer Schnerd, RN"

in reply to Joe Barta on 05/01/2006 4:06 AM

05/01/2006 8:38 AM

J T wrote:
> I also discard about half of the e-mail from my mother also. But,
> when I do reply to her, I'm polite.


My mother died last year at Christmas. I don't know what I would do if I
received an email from her.



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN

[email protected]

JJ

in reply to "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" on 05/01/2006 8:38 AM

05/01/2006 3:04 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 8:38am (EST+5) [email protected]
(Mortimer=A0Schnerd,=A0RN) sayeth:
My mother died last year at Christmas. I don't know what I would do if I
received an email from her.

Sorry for that. I think I would be very frightened, and very,
very, polite.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

JB

Joe Barta

in reply to Joe Barta on 05/01/2006 4:06 AM

05/01/2006 8:50 AM

Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:

> J T wrote:
>> I also discard about half of the e-mail from my mother also.
>> But, when I do reply to her, I'm polite.
>
> My mother died last year at Christmas. I don't know what I would
> do if I received an email from her.


If I'm remembering correctly, there's an Internet service where you
can send yourself (or whoever) a delayed email. Submit the email and
when you want it delivered... in six months, a year, maybe longer.

What if she sent one of those? Just be sure you don't discard it and
if you do reply, be polite ;-)

Joe Barta

JB

Joe Barta

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 9:00 AM

Kevin Craig wrote:

> All the other replies so far have been cool, and adressed the
> subject.
>
> So, let me just say this: JOAT is cool. WebTV sucks. How someone
> is able to find and post such great plans, yet be stuck in a
> sub-par operating system, escapes me.
>
> Kevin
>

Well first, calling WebTV an "operating system" is like calling a peep
show "getting laid".

That said, he's happy with what he has. It suits his purposes and it's
not "sub par" anything. If I want to drill a hole and a $15 hand drill
does the job for me and I'm happy with it, why would I want to go out
and buy a drill press? If ever he wants to do more, or break past the
limitations of WebTV I'm sure he'd dig deep and buy a shiny new
'puter.

Joe Barta

JJ

in reply to Joe Barta on 05/01/2006 9:00 AM

05/01/2006 3:11 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 9:00am (EST+5) [email protected] (Joe=A0Barta) spaketh
thusly:
<snip> That said, he's happy with what he has. It suits his purposes and
it's not "sub par" anything. If I want to drill a hole and a $15 hand
drill does the job for me and I'm happy with it, why would I want to go
out and buy a drill press? If ever he wants to do more, or break past
the limitations of WebTV I'm sure he'd dig deep and buy a shiny new
'puter.

Well, at last, you got "something" right. LMAO



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

EP

"Edwin Pawlowski"

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 2:45 PM


"J T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I almost forgot. Besides having a WebTV, things I do not have,
> include:
> A welcome mat.
> A guest room.
> JOAT

Damn, now I have to change my vacation plans.
Ed

JJ

in reply to "Edwin Pawlowski" on 05/01/2006 2:45 PM

05/01/2006 3:28 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 2:45pm (EST+5) [email protected] (Edwin=A0Pawlowski)
shockingly states:
Damn, now I have to change my vacation plans. Ed

Well, Hell. And I was all prepared. I just counted, and I've got
116 rolls of toilet paper. The soft kind, too.

Soft toilet paper, now that's creative woodworking.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

JG

Joe Gorman

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 7:08 AM

J T wrote:
> I almost forgot. Besides having a WebTV, things I do not have,
> include:
> A cell phone.
> An answering machine.
> An IPod.or whatever the Hell it is.
> A digital camera.
> A satellite dish.
> A stereo..
> Any other of those irritating little gadgets.
> A welcome mat.
> A guest room.
> A portable CD player.
> A telephone in my truck.
> A suit.
> More than one pair of shoes.
>
> And, I don't care.
>
>
>
> JOAT
> You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
> What do you "know"?
> - Granny Weatherwax
>


Everyone needs more than one pair of shoes, or footwear, st least. Just
in case you step in something that shouldn't have been there.
Joe
with kids that bring dogs to visit.

JJ

in reply to Joe Gorman on 05/01/2006 7:08 AM

05/01/2006 3:19 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 7:08am [email protected] (Joe=A0Gorman) doth sayeth:
Everyone needs more than one pair of shoes, or footwear, st least. Just
in case you step in something that shouldn't have been there. Joe
with kids that bring dogs to visit.

Next birthday, buy each kid a Sooper Dooper Pooper Scooper, and
tell them to bring it along on their visits - and to use it.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

Ob

Odinn

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 9:50 PM

On 1/4/2006 10:29 PM Mike W. mumbled something about the following:
> Sorry if this sounds like I'm being an ass, Im not. I enjoy your
> posts... but why use your email address if you don't want emails?
>
> Do what I do. Betcha can't email me.
>
> Mike W.
>
> J T wrote:
>> Got another e-mail today, in response to a post I made. I'll tell
>> you all yet once again - if you have a reply to a post, then make it in
>> the appropriate thread, don't e-mail me. ESPECIALLY, don't send me an
>> e-mail and don't bother stating it's by e-mail only - that's very rude.
>> There is a small number of people on the group I don't mind e-mails
>> from. They know who they are. If you're not sure if you're in that
>> group, chances are you aren't.

Could be the fact that he's using webtv? I don't know much about it
nowadays, but you used to not be able to change your From: on webtv.

--
Odinn - wondering if he can set up his TiVo sorta like a webtv.

JJ

in reply to Odinn on 05/01/2006 9:50 PM

05/01/2006 10:36 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 9:50pm [email protected] (Odinn) wanders in and
speaks so:
Could be the fact that he's using webtv? I don't know much about it
nowadays, but you used to not be able to change your From: on webtv.

Judging from some of the stuff the WebTV fanatics have come up
with, I wouldn't be surprised if it could be done.
But I haven't even bothered to check if it can, or not.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 11:13 PM

On 5 Jan 2006 19:55:37 -0800, [email protected] wrote:

>
>Tom Watson wrote:
>>
>> Lordy, I do love this thread when it pops up again.
>>
>> It is a sidereal phenomenon and is a precursor to the sure arrival of
>> another Robin's Butt thread.
>>
>> I always enjoy those, too.
>>
>
> Tom, Are you referring to Robin Hartyl's butt?
>
>>
>> (watson - who is looking forward to the inevitable Robin's Butt
>> thread, even though Robin is getting along in years.)
>>
>
>I don't mind a little gray haired gal with a perfect behind. Did I
>happen to mention that,, I LOVE YOU ROBIN HARTYL !!! PLEEEEEEEEEASE
>!!!
>
>Tom in KY, Hey, can you really blame me? PLEEEEEEASE ROBIN, YOU KNOW I
>LOVE YOU !!! Just answer 1 phone call and drop the restraining order
>and maybe you'll start to love me too! :-)


There you go.


I told you they was connected.





Tom Watson - WoodDorker

tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)

http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/

Lr

"Leon"

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 3:47 PM


"Joe Barta" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Well first, calling WebTV an "operating system" is like calling a peep
> show "getting laid".


ROTFLMAO...... What's "Getting Laid"???

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

05/01/2006 8:02 PM

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:00:12 -0500, [email protected] (J T)
wrote:

> Got another e-mail today, in response to a post I made. I'll tell
>you all yet once again - if you have a reply to a post, then make it in
>the appropriate thread, don't e-mail me. ESPECIALLY, don't send me an
>e-mail and don't bother stating it's by e-mail only - that's very rude.
>
> There is a small number of people on the group I don't mind e-mails
>from. They know who they are. If you're not sure if you're in that
>group, chances are you aren't.
>
>
>
>JOAT
>You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
>What do you "know"?
>- Granny Weatherwax


Lordy, I do love this thread when it pops up again.

It is a sidereal phenomenon and is a precursor to the sure arrival of
another Robin's Butt thread.

I always enjoy those, too.

JOAT is a mainstay of the Wreck and, since he will not say it himself,
I will inform you that folks from his neck of the Carolinas only need
one pair of shoes - because they only wear shoes during the coldest
part of the year.

This would be from January 15 to March 1.

It would not be unlikely for a man to have one pair of shoes that he
used from the time of his birth until his inevitable insertion into
the Pineywood box.

That is why only size elevens are sold in that area. They are a tad
hard on the younguns but have a better's chance of being right on the
back end.


(watson - who has emailed JOAT but only in response - as he is a
respectful man.)

(watson - who is looking forward to the inevitable Robin's Butt
thread, even though Robin is getting along in years.)




Tom Watson - WoodDorker

tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)

http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/

KC

Kevin Craig

in reply to Tom Watson on 05/01/2006 8:02 PM

05/01/2006 11:10 PM

In article <[email protected]>, jo4hn
<[email protected]> wrote:

> He was a rather large person with 5 1/2 EEEEE shoe
> size.

You mean there's ANOTHER one? I thought my brother in law was the only
person in the world wearing 5-1/2 EEEEE shoes. His feet are *square*.

Kevin

jj

jo4hn

in reply to Tom Watson on 05/01/2006 8:02 PM

05/01/2006 7:37 PM

J T wrote:

> Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 8:02pm [email protected] (Tom Watson) who stumbled
> in and spake thusly:
> Lordy, I do love this thread when it pops up again. <snip> I will
> inform you that folks from his neck of the Carolinas only need one pair
> of shoes - because they only wear shoes during the coldest part of the
> year. This would be from January 15 to March 1.<snip>
> That is why only size elevens are sold in that area. They are a tad hard
> on the younguns but have a better's chance of being right on the back
> end. <snip>
>
> Close, but no ceegar. My present pair of shoes are actually size
> 13 wide wide. That's because my usual size, 8 1/2 EEEE was unfindable,
> and the 13s were the only size I could find that were wide enough. I
> got them in about 1997, and they're not very warn at all. They're only
> worn outside, they're not house shoes. I'm thinking of buying another
> pair tho, and store them, in case these wear out.
>

I had a cousin who lived in Willow, Alaska. Our family has a reunion
every two years. Many years ago, it was held in Sacramento, CA and his
two requirements were that I find a joint with Coors beer on tap and a
big man's store. He was a rather large person with 5 1/2 EEEEE shoe
size. One smartass offered to sell him the boxes. We finally found
something close in an Army surplus store. They were work shoes but were
black and had laces. He bought the last two pairs they had. The Coors
acually tasted good after that.
mahalo,
jo4hn

JJ

in reply to Tom Watson on 05/01/2006 8:02 PM

05/01/2006 8:56 PM

Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 8:02pm [email protected] (Tom=A0Watson) who stumbled
in and spake thusly:
Lordy, I do love this thread when it pops up again. <snip> I will
inform you that folks from his neck of the Carolinas only need one pair
of shoes - because they only wear shoes during the coldest part of the
year. This would be from January 15 to March 1.<snip>
That is why only size elevens are sold in that area. They are a tad hard
on the younguns but have a better's chance of being right on the back
end. <snip>

Close, but no ceegar. My present pair of shoes are actually size
13 wide wide. That's because my usual size, 8 1/2 EEEE was unfindable,
and the 13s were the only size I could find that were wide enough. I
got them in about 1997, and they're not very warn at all. They're only
worn outside, they're not house shoes. I'm thinking of buying another
pair tho, and store them, in case these wear out.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Tom Watson on 05/01/2006 8:02 PM

05/01/2006 11:47 PM

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:56:20 -0500, [email protected] (J T)
wrote:


> Close, but no ceegar. My present pair of shoes are actually size
>13 wide wide. That's because my usual size, 8 1/2 EEEE was unfindable,
>and the 13s were the only size I could find that were wide enough. I
>got them in about 1997, and they're not very warn at all. They're only
>worn outside, they're not house shoes. I'm thinking of buying another
>pair tho, and store them, in case these wear out.



I'll bet that the last decent shoes that you had was GI - and no one
gave a damn about the wide.

Although it is just possible that you was wearing indian leather
before anyone else caught on.


(watson - who knows damned well that JOAT wears Bostonian Size 11, FBI
Shoes.)





Tom Watson - WoodDorker

tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)

http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Tom Watson on 05/01/2006 8:02 PM

05/01/2006 11:10 PM

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:56:20 -0500, [email protected] (J T)
wrote:

>Thu, Jan 5, 2006, 8:02pm [email protected] (Tom Watson) who stumbled
>in and spake thusly:
>Lordy, I do love this thread when it pops up again. <snip> I will
>inform you that folks from his neck of the Carolinas only need one pair
>of shoes - because they only wear shoes during the coldest part of the
>year. This would be from January 15 to March 1.<snip>
>That is why only size elevens are sold in that area. They are a tad hard
>on the younguns but have a better's chance of being right on the back
>end. <snip>
>
> Close, but no ceegar. My present pair of shoes are actually size
>13 wide wide. That's because my usual size, 8 1/2 EEEE was unfindable,
>and the 13s were the only size I could find that were wide enough. I
>got them in about 1997, and they're not very warn at all. They're only
>worn outside, they're not house shoes. I'm thinking of buying another
>pair tho, and store them, in case these wear out.
>
>
>
>JOAT
>You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
>What do you "know"?
>- Granny Weatherwax



Rock on JOAT>

Heee!
Tom Watson - WoodDorker

tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)

http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/

Ba

B a r r y

in reply to [email protected] (J T) on 04/01/2006 3:00 PM

06/01/2006 12:20 PM

J T wrote:
> Got another e-mail today, in response to a post I made. I'll tell
> you all yet once again - if you have a reply to a post, then make it in
> the appropriate thread, don't e-mail me.

I also dislike getting a reply via the group AND email.

BTW, since you don't have a cell phone, I have a really nice cell phone,
along with a tab picked up every month by my boss.

It's yours for the asking! <G>

Barry

Ba

B a r r y

in reply to B a r r y on 06/01/2006 12:20 PM

06/01/2006 7:51 PM

J T wrote:

> Trying to weasel out of giving your sacrifice to the Woodworking
> Gods, eh? Won't work. Among other things, who would I call? Not you,
> because I'd have your phone. No thanks. Nice try tho.

I could put it in a wood box...

JJ

in reply to B a r r y on 06/01/2006 7:51 PM

06/01/2006 9:21 PM

Fri, Jan 6, 2006, 7:51pm (EST+5)
[email protected] (B=A0a=A0r=A0r=A0y) tries
to fool me:
I could put it in a wood box...

Send wood. Keep phone.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax

JJ

in reply to B a r r y on 06/01/2006 12:20 PM

06/01/2006 2:05 PM

Fri, Jan 6, 2006, 12:20pm (EST+5)
[email protected] (B=A0a=A0r=A0r=A0y) who
doth sayeth:
<snip> BTW, since you don't have a cell phone, I have a really nice cell
phone, along with a tab picked up every month by my boss.
It's yours for the asking! <G>

Trying to weasel out of giving your sacrifice to the Woodworking
Gods, eh? Won't work. Among other things, who would I call? Not you,
because I'd have your phone. No thanks. Nice try tho.



JOAT
You'll never get anywhere if you believe what you "hear".
What do you "know"?
- Granny Weatherwax


You’ve reached the end of replies