jJ

[email protected] (James Rabbit)

22/10/2005 6:07 AM

Re: Current Count - As Of 10/18/05

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:55:39 -0500, "Todd Fatheree" <[email protected]>
wrote:

And at least they are enough smart to make an about U turn after being
fool by the neo-cons!

>Just in case we want to inject some actual facts into this thread, here's
>another count.
>
>US Senators authorizing war against Iraq: 77 (even Kerry voted for it,
>before he voted against it)
>US Senators voting against: 23
>
>todd


This topic has 3 replies

f

in reply to [email protected] (James Rabbit) on 22/10/2005 6:07 AM

22/10/2005 10:04 AM


James Rabbit wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:55:39 -0500, "Todd Fatheree" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> And at least they are enough smart to make an about U turn after being
> fool by the neo-cons!
>
> >Just in case we want to inject some actual facts into this thread, here's
> >another count.
> >
> >US Senators authorizing war against Iraq: 77 (even Kerry voted for it,
> >before he voted against it)
> >US Senators voting against: 23
> >


They've taken Bush's advice.

--

FF

"Fool me once, shame on you -- and we won;t be fooled again!"
-- George W. Bush

CS

"Charlie Self"

in reply to [email protected] (James Rabbit) on 22/10/2005 6:07 AM

23/10/2005 7:12 AM


Henry St.Pierre wrote:
> [email protected] (James Rabbit) wrote in news:435ad48a.2918462
> @news20.forteinc.com:
>
>
> Is the opposite of a 'neo-con' a 'paleo-lib'?
> Just curious.
> Hank

To take care of your curiosity, the opposite of a neo-con is a true
Conservative.

HS

"Henry St.Pierre"

in reply to [email protected] (James Rabbit) on 22/10/2005 6:07 AM

22/10/2005 4:12 PM

[email protected] (James Rabbit) wrote in news:435ad48a.2918462
@news20.forteinc.com:


Is the opposite of a 'neo-con' a 'paleo-lib'?
Just curious.
Hank


You’ve reached the end of replies