"Robert Galloway" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> This post came through as a blank. Problem on my end or elsewhere?
>
> bob g.
Just read the subject line and no text is needed.
In article <[email protected]>, Kathy
Wehrle <[email protected]> wrote:
Screws.
[email protected] (Kathy Wehrle) wrote:
Screws, cross bracing, gluing plywood to sides of floor joists,
doubling joists, and what would have really helped, your contractor
should have used construction adhesive on the top of the joists before
laying down the subflooring.
Pick your poison,
Wes
--
Reply to:
Whiskey Echo Sierra Sierra AT Gee Tee EYE EYE dot COM
Lycos address is a spam trap.
Hit the library or a used book store for home repair texts. Three methods
come immediately to mind, which pertain in different circumstances.
Fix floor to the joists, curtail movement of joists with crossbraces, lube
with talc or similar if neither of the other are possible.
"Kathy Wehrle" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
"Kathy Wehrle" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
Rivets, if they are laid directly on steel I beams.
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 03:17:16 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>"Robert Galloway" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> This post came through as a blank. Problem on my end or elsewhere?
>>
>> bob g.
>
>Just read the subject line and no text is needed.
>
The subject line made sense to YOU?! lol
Have a nice one...
Trent
Budweiser: Helping ugly people have sex since 1876!
"DC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> Putting the content of a post in the Subject field for the sake of
> expediency is like writing someone a letter on the outside of an
> envelope to save a sheet of foolscap.
You mean like, send a postcard?
>
> What the OP should have done is title her post something like "Subject:
> Squeaky Wooden Floors" and then asked her question in the body.
Did they teach you that at the Department of Redundancy Department.
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:37:04 -0500, Trent© <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 03:17:16 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>"Robert Galloway" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> This post came through as a blank. Problem on my end or elsewhere?
>>>
>>> bob g.
>>
>>Just read the subject line and no text is needed.
>>
>
>The subject line made sense to YOU?! lol
>
>
as much as the other troll about furnace filters did..
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> "Robert Galloway" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> This post came through as a blank. Problem on my end or elsewhere?
>> bob g.
> Just read the subject line and no text is needed.
A subject line is for the subject of the post. The body of the post
should contain the, er... well, the meat of the post. }:O)
Putting the content of a post in the Subject field for the sake of
expediency is like writing someone a letter on the outside of an
envelope to save a sheet of foolscap.
What the OP should have done is title her post something like "Subject:
Squeaky Wooden Floors" and then asked her question in the body.
Just my 2¢.
--
DC Linux RU #1000111011000111001
Health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> "DC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> Putting the content of a post in the Subject field for the sake of
>> expediency is like writing someone a letter on the outside of an
>> envelope to save a sheet of foolscap.
> You mean like, send a postcard?
Oh, cut it out. You know what I mean.
>> What the OP should have done is title her post something like "Subject:
>> Squeaky Wooden Floors" and then asked her question in the body.
> Did they teach you that at the Department of Redundancy Department.
Edwin, you're just no fun. }:O)
--
DC Linux RU #1000111011000111001
Health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.