Re:Workbench Vises

In article <[email protected]>,
Bob Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>in 1194548 20050401 171601 alexy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>"Never Enough Money" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>I'm beginning to think the death penalty should apply to spammers, even
>>>if they are 10 year old nerds.
>>
>>Add to that class of capital criminals the new breed of Google Groups
>>no-context posters, who make top posters look absolutely considerate!
>
>
>I hope you aren't referring to me - I'm using a mail client which I've
>just written
>(in Java) and I'm still getting the bugs out.

Note for the "entomological expedition leader" (otherwise known as the
chief bug-hunter :) -- a response to a newsgroup article needs a
"References: " header, containing either:
(1) the contents of the References header in the article you're
responding to, _plus_ the message-ID of that article,
or (2) [if no References header in that article] just the message-ID
of the article to which you are responding.

Bob Martin <[email protected]> wrote:

>in 1194548 20050401 171601 alexy <[email protected]> wrote:

>>Add to that class of capital criminals the new breed of Google Groups
>>no-context posters, who make top posters look absolutely considerate!
>
>
>I hope you aren't referring to me - I'm using a mail client which I've just written
>(in Java) and I'm still getting the bugs out.
>

Heck, no; you just bottom posted after quoting relevant context, so I
could tell to what you were replying. No hangman for you! <g>

BTW, that sounds ambitious. Are you planning to market it, put it out
in the public domain, or just for personal use?

--
Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently.