I acquired a used 52" round table top. The former owner ruined the
legs from long storage in a wet basement. Looking at the bottom of the
table, I think it had a pedestal base. This thing is a monster-- it
has 4 leaves and extra legs to fold down when it's expanded.
I'd like to build or buy a new base for it. Is there a formula for
figuring out how wide the legs need to spread so the table is sturdy &
won't tip?
I've seen a few pedestals for sale that are max 8" diameter with 12"
legs, but that seems way too small for a 52" top. Can anyone suggest a
source for a larger one?
Thanks!
Our 42" pedestal table has feet with about 35" spread.
On 9 Nov 2005 07:22:11 -0800, "Chris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I acquired a used 52" round table top. The former owner ruined the
>legs from long storage in a wet basement. Looking at the bottom of the
>table, I think it had a pedestal base. This thing is a monster-- it
>has 4 leaves and extra legs to fold down when it's expanded.
>
>I'd like to build or buy a new base for it. Is there a formula for
>figuring out how wide the legs need to spread so the table is sturdy &
>won't tip?
>
>I've seen a few pedestals for sale that are max 8" diameter with 12"
>legs, but that seems way too small for a 52" top. Can anyone suggest a
>source for a larger one?
>
>Thanks!
Hi Chris,
These guys suggest 48" max for a single pedestal although I have gone up to
59" for a poker table. Or you can use a double pedestal. Cheers, JG
http://store.woodturners.net/ca/catalogue/default.php?cPath=11_6
Chris wrote:
> I acquired a used 52" round table top. The former owner ruined the
> legs from long storage in a wet basement. Looking at the bottom of the
> table, I think it had a pedestal base. This thing is a monster-- it
> has 4 leaves and extra legs to fold down when it's expanded.
>
> I'd like to build or buy a new base for it. Is there a formula for
> figuring out how wide the legs need to spread so the table is sturdy &
> won't tip?
>
> I've seen a few pedestals for sale that are max 8" diameter with 12"
> legs, but that seems way too small for a 52" top. Can anyone suggest a
> source for a larger one?
>
> Thanks!