I play some music and I build some woodwork.
Something that is interesting to me that brings the two together is
that, if I build a piece and it does not look complete to me in some
way, there is usually a simple explanation for the completion.
I think that this sense is very analogous to what a musician goes
through in trying to come to a resolve.
In music, we have fairly finite ways of coming to a resolve.
I suspect that we also have fairly finite ways of coming to a resolve
in the physical realm of wooddorking.
I'm not going to complexify this by saying any more.
Regards,
Tom
Thos.J.Watson - Cabinetmaker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet
www.home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:a79d129e-6878-46af-b01c-37a5939fc96f@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 4, 8:50 am, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Then again, as in music, some have it, some don't ... I find myself
>> firmly
>> in the latter category when it comes to design.
>
> Given today's taste in clothing and music--sweeping generalities time--
> my design sense, generally known as "clunky", should be coming into
> vogue any day.
I'm sure that is not true, but thanks for the chuckle.
"Tom Watson" wrote in message
> I play some music and I build some woodwork.
>
> Something that is interesting to me that brings the two together is
> that, if I build a piece and it does not look complete to me in some
> way, there is usually a simple explanation for the completion.
Read up a bit on the theory of "cadence" in Western music ... it could open
up your mind for some ideas for "completion/resolution".
The best of both musicians and designers seem to have an inanate sense of
"cadence" in their respective aural and visual senses.
> I think that this sense is very analogous to what a musician goes
> through in trying to come to a resolve.
> In music, we have fairly finite ways of coming to a resolve.
>
> I suspect that we also have fairly finite ways of coming to a resolve
> in the physical realm of wooddorking.
>
> I'm not going to complexify this by saying any more.
In music, if the listener can anticipate the next note more than 50% of the
time, the piece is boring; if he can't, it is scattered - (Jerry Coker
"Improvising Jazz"). Seemingly, this concept can be extrapolated to a visual
sense ... in design, the good ones in a particular genre (Greene & Greene?)
do seem to do pretty much just that.
Then again, as in music, some have it, some don't ... I find myself firmly
in the latter category when it comes to design.
In art, as well as in design, I've always imagined that a correlation exists
between the musical concepts of "tonal" with Western design, and "atonal"
with Eastern ... but an imagination is vital to the process.
Maybe that's the answer?
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 5/14/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:22:35 -0700 (PDT), Charlie Self
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Given today's taste in clothing and music--sweeping generalities time--
>my design sense, generally known as "clunky", should be coming into
>vogue any day.
Wear it in confidence, and BE style!
Fat chicks in belly shirts do the same...
---------------------------------------------
** http://www.bburke.com/woodworking.html **
---------------------------------------------
On Jun 4, 8:50 am, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Then again, as in music, some have it, some don't ... I find myself firmly
> in the latter category when it comes to design.
Given today's taste in clothing and music--sweeping generalities time--
my design sense, generally known as "clunky", should be coming into
vogue any day.