Delta QT-10 vs. Ryobi BT3100

I have the Ryobi BT300SX

The projects here were made with that saw.

http://woodwork.pmccl.com/

It's definitely not like my dad's old cast iron table saw with the
induction motor. I get pissed if I can see 1/64 to 1/128 error. in a
miter cut. You need that precision for fine work. The old cast iron
table saw didn't do work quite that fine. So it's not the material of
the saw -- it is the quality of the manufacturing and the accuracy and
precision of the mechanics.

Regardless of which saw you get - get the angle gauges (to set up the
tilt and miter gauges) from Lee Valley if you do fine work - and an
accurate engineers square to check the squareness of the work.

I have used the router table for a Black and Decker 3/4 horse. (Single
speed - too fast) and a King Variable speed 3 1/4 horse. It works OK - I
will be adding a router bench -- perhaps on the ceiling -- since there
is room there.

If you have a drill press it is easy to change or make a plate.


Check here for lots of info.
http://bt3central.com/
http://www.ryobitools.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=list&forum=DCForumID24&conf=DCConfID1


[email protected] wrote:
> I am purchasing a table saw for personal use - I have no (immediate)
> aspirations to become a cabinet maker. I will be using it first of to
> help build a deck, some fences and the odd table, bench or whatever
> after that. I have two available that fit my budget: The Delta QT-10
> and Ryobi BT3100 - anyone have any experience with these?
>
> The Roybi has more bells and whistles, and the Delta feels like an 'old
> school' dependable saw. Anyone have any recommendations on one over
> the other? Some questions I am wondering about are:
>
> -induction vs. belt driven: Is there a noticeable difference in feel
> between the Delta's 10amp induction and the Ryobi's 15amp belt. Being
> a novice I'm more concerned with safety - would one be safer?
>
> -Cast Iron vs. sliding miter table thingy: The Sliding miter table
> looks neat - but will it be practical? Is the Cast Iron better than
> the Ryobi's plastic table top?
>
> -Is the Ryobi's router table attachment any good? I have a Porter
> Cable 693LR/PK - any headaches getting this router combo to work with
> it?
>

--
Will
Occasional Techno-geek

Had one of those BT3000's a number of years ago with the sliding miter
table. Nice feature. But it wouldn't stay aligned with the blade (the
sliding fence was troublesome too) and as such was more trouble than it
was worth. The biggest drawback was that model didn't have a miter
gauge slot. That may not seem like a big deal, until you look into
making some jigs.

The router table attachment was pretty decent. (Though, it was just a
hole in the top that was tapped for the Ryobi router and I'm guessing
those holes wouldn't have lined up with the PC base) I seem to recall
though that it did not have a removable insert and it wouldn't accept
larger panel-raising bits.

Overall, the Ryobi, with all of the bells and whistles, was really less
capable than most of the less expensive benchtop saws.

Much appreciated! Ryobi it is. Thanks for all the help.

BTW, I will be using mainly my circular saw & miter saw for the deck -
I want to get this purchase in before I go broke from buying all the
wood. :D

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>I am purchasing a table saw for personal use - I have no (immediate)
>aspirations to become a cabinet maker. I will be using it first of to
>help build a deck, some fences and the odd table, bench or whatever
>after that.

For decking, unless it is a *very*small* deck, a good quality hand-held
circular saw -- generically a "SkilSaw", regardless of who actually made
it -- is a more appropriate tool.

> I have two available that fit my budget: The Delta QT-10
>and Ryobi BT3100 - anyone have any experience with these?

The BT3100 is capable of *excellent* work -- it's a h*ll of a good saw
for the money. The only downside is that you _do_ have to treat it with
reasonable "care and affection" for it to last. It _is_ marketed as a
"precision woodworking" tool, not something you can beat up on and abuse
day after day.

To find something 'significantly better' than the 3100, you probably have
to look at spending _at_least_ twice the money.

As for belt-drive, vs. direct-drive -- belt drive is almost always better.
Tends to be smoother running, and is *MUCH* less expensive repair when
something in the 'drive train' has problems.


If your 'down the road' work -- "... the odd table, bench", etc. is going
to be mostly "rough" work -- e.g. stuff for the shop/garage/etc. not anything
you would want to proudly display in the living room or bedroom, etc., the
aforementioned hand-held circular saw -- along with a couple of 'guides' for
making straight rips and cross-cuts -- is likely to be the best fit, and the
most economical solution to your needs.

I bought the BT3000, predecessor to the BT3100, about the time of
introduction. I'd miss the sliding miter but have no experience with
what some would call a "real TS". I've never considered using the
router slab that came with the saw, have built shop built tables
instead.

On 22 Feb 2005 10:31:52 -0800, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I am purchasing a table saw for personal use - I have no (immediate)
>aspirations to become a cabinet maker. I will be using it first of to
>help build a deck, some fences and the odd table, bench or whatever
>after that. I have two available that fit my budget: The Delta QT-10
>and Ryobi BT3100 - anyone have any experience with these?
>
>The Roybi has more bells and whistles, and the Delta feels like an 'old
>school' dependable saw. Anyone have any recommendations on one over
>the other? Some questions I am wondering about are:
>
>-induction vs. belt driven: Is there a noticeable difference in feel
>between the Delta's 10amp induction and the Ryobi's 15amp belt. Being
>a novice I'm more concerned with safety - would one be safer?
>
>-Cast Iron vs. sliding miter table thingy: The Sliding miter table
>looks neat - but will it be practical? Is the Cast Iron better than
>the Ryobi's plastic table top?
>
>-Is the Ryobi's router table attachment any good? I have a Porter
>Cable 693LR/PK - any headaches getting this router combo to work with
>it?

As he said, for a deck or fence, the table saw is pretty much useless (Ok,
limited use, unless you need to justify the purchase to SWMBO somehow.
We'll back you up in that case). A mitre saw or good circular saw will be
much more productive.

Clint

"Robert Bonomi" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>>I am purchasing a table saw for personal use - I have no (immediate)
>>aspirations to become a cabinet maker. I will be using it first of to
>>help build a deck, some fences and the odd table, bench or whatever
>>after that.
>
> For decking, unless it is a *very*small* deck, a good quality hand-held
> circular saw -- generically a "SkilSaw", regardless of who actually made
> it -- is a more appropriate tool.
>
>> I have two available that fit my budget: The Delta QT-10
>>and Ryobi BT3100 - anyone have any experience with these?
>
> The BT3100 is capable of *excellent* work -- it's a h*ll of a good saw
> for the money. The only downside is that you _do_ have to treat it with
> reasonable "care and affection" for it to last. It _is_ marketed as a
> "precision woodworking" tool, not something you can beat up on and abuse
> day after day.
>
> To find something 'significantly better' than the 3100, you probably have
> to look at spending _at_least_ twice the money.
>
> As for belt-drive, vs. direct-drive -- belt drive is almost always better.
> Tends to be smoother running, and is *MUCH* less expensive repair when
> something in the 'drive train' has problems.
>
>
> If your 'down the road' work -- "... the odd table, bench", etc. is going
> to be mostly "rough" work -- e.g. stuff for the shop/garage/etc. not
> anything
> you would want to proudly display in the living room or bedroom, etc., the
> aforementioned hand-held circular saw -- along with a couple of 'guides'
> for
> making straight rips and cross-cuts -- is likely to be the best fit, and
> the
> most economical solution to your needs.
>

Bought the BT3100 2 years ago and love it. Great saw for the shop.
John

[email protected] wrote:

>I am purchasing a table saw for personal use - I have no (immediate)
>aspirations to become a cabinet maker. I will be using it first of to
>help build a deck, some fences and the odd table, bench or whatever
>after that. I have two available that fit my budget: The Delta QT-10
>and Ryobi BT3100 - anyone have any experience with these?
>
>The Roybi has more bells and whistles, and the Delta feels like an 'old
>school' dependable saw. Anyone have any recommendations on one over
>the other? Some questions I am wondering about are:
>
>-induction vs. belt driven: Is there a noticeable difference in feel
>between the Delta's 10amp induction and the Ryobi's 15amp belt. Being
>a novice I'm more concerned with safety - would one be safer?
>
>-Cast Iron vs. sliding miter table thingy: The Sliding miter table
>looks neat - but will it be practical? Is the Cast Iron better than
>the Ryobi's plastic table top?
>
>-Is the Ryobi's router table attachment any good? I have a Porter
>Cable 693LR/PK - any headaches getting this router combo to work with
>it?
>
>
>