goodgawdamity!!!! Seems that every anal retentive Adam Henry that parses
these messages is chiming in on their personal version of perfection in the
world. Proclaiming that if life doesn't comply with their personal view of
perfection, it ain't no damned good at all, e.g. KILL FILE THE BASTARDS!!!!.
What all of them have obviously missed is the fact that I don't really give
a big rat's ass about a particular method of posting. What I'm really doing
is "goat hunting" and it's obvious that I got a few peoples goats....I
WIN!!!
When (and if) you reply to this message, feel free to top post, bottom post,
middle post, snip, don't snip etc. etc. but bygawd if you side post, I'm
sending the Usenet police to discipline your sorry ass.
Oh, by the way, regarding email, I have no equal.
F p In article <[email protected]>,
e r good ol' Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
n e >goodgawdamity!!!! Seems that every anal retentive Adam Henry that
c f >parses these messages is chiming in on their personal version of
e e >perfection in the world. Proclaiming that if life doesn't comply
r > with their personal view of perfection, it ain't no damned good
P a >at all, e.g. KILL FILE THE BASTARDS!!!!.
o b >
s l >What all of them have obviously missed is the fact that I don't
t e >really give a big rat's ass about a particular method of posting.
i >What I'm really doing is "goat hunting" and it's obvious that I
n f >got a few peoples goats....I WIN!!!
g o >
r >When (and if) you reply to this message, feel free to top post,
i >bottom post, middle post, snip, don't snip etc. etc. but bygawd
s w >if you side post, I'm sending the Usenet police to discipline
o >your sorry ass.
m o >
u d >Oh, by the way, regarding email, I have no equal.
c . >
h >
In article <[email protected]>, Treetops <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Robert Bonom
>news:112ungpg
>>
>> F p In a
>> e r good
>> n e >goo
>> c f >par
>> e e >per
>> r > wi
>> P a >at
>> o b >
>> s l >Wha
>> t e >rea
>> i >Wha
>> n f >got
>> g o >
>> r >Whe
>> i >bot
>> s w >if
>> o >you
>> m o >
>> u d >Oh,
>> c . >
>> h >
>>
>>
>Gosh darn, how am I supposed to snip/trim these last 2 posts....
>I only got thru snipping 101.
With 'fence post'ing, it is *marginally* (the right margin, that is)
possible. See above. <*SNICKER*>
Gosh darn, how am I supposed to snip/trim these last 2 posts....
I only got thru snipping 101.
"Robert Bonomi" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> F p In article <[email protected]>,
> e r good ol' Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
> n e >goodgawdamity!!!! Seems that every anal retentive Adam Henry
that
> c f >parses these messages is chiming in on their personal version
of
> e e >perfection in the world. Proclaiming that if life doesn't
comply
> r > with their personal view of perfection, it ain't no damned
good
> P a >at all, e.g. KILL FILE THE BASTARDS!!!!.
> o b >
> s l >What all of them have obviously missed is the fact that I
don't
> t e >really give a big rat's ass about a particular method of
posting.
> i >What I'm really doing is "goat hunting" and it's obvious that
I
> n f >got a few peoples goats....I WIN!!!
> g o >
> r >When (and if) you reply to this message, feel free to top
post,
> i >bottom post, middle post, snip, don't snip etc. etc. but
bygawd
> s w >if you side post, I'm sending the Usenet police to discipline
> o >your sorry ass.
> m o >
> u d >Oh, by the way, regarding email, I have no equal.
> c . >
> h >
>
>
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:50:11 -0500, Treetops <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gosh darn, how am I supposed to snip/trim these last 2 posts....
> I only got thru snipping 101.
<plonk>
Articulate and well thought out responses like "OldNick's" are always
welcome by those of us who live in the real world...they invariably provide
a good laugh.
Mack: This only takes a few seconds of my time. Today I'm making drywall
dust instead of sawdust.
"OldNick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:17:32 GMT, "good ol' Bob"
> <[email protected]> vaguely proposed a theory
> ......and in reply I say!:
>
> you are a waste of space cunt bob. Post that where you like,
> preferable sideways.
"good ol' Bob" <bob=
[email protected]>
writes:
> When (and if) you <| Okay! |> reply to this message, feel
> free to top post, <| Middle posting |> bottom post, middle post,
>snip, don't snip e <| is fine with me |> tc. etc. but bygawd if you
>side post, I'm sen <| as well... |> ding the Usenet police to
>discipline your so <| :-) |> rry ass.
--
Sending unsolicited commercial e-mail to this account incurs a fee of
$500 per message, and acknowledges the legality of this contract.
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:17:32 GMT, "good ol' Bob"
<[email protected]> vaguely proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:
you are a waste of space cunt bob. Post that where you like,
preferable sideways.
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:35:37 -0000, [email protected] (Robert Bonomi)
wrote:
> F p In article <[email protected]>,
> e r good ol' Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
> n e >goodgawdamity!!!! Seems that every anal retentive Adam Henry that
> c f >parses these messages is chiming in on their personal version of
> e e >perfection in the world. Proclaiming that if life doesn't comply
> r > with their personal view of perfection, it ain't no damned good
> P a >at all, e.g. KILL FILE THE BASTARDS!!!!.
> o b >
> s l >What all of them have obviously missed is the fact that I don't
> t e >really give a big rat's ass about a particular method of posting.
> i >What I'm really doing is "goat hunting" and it's obvious that I
> n f >got a few peoples goats....I WIN!!!
> g o >
> r >When (and if) you reply to this message, feel free to top post,
> i >bottom post, middle post, snip, don't snip etc. etc. but bygawd
> s w >if you side post, I'm sending the Usenet police to discipline
> o >your sorry ass.
> m o >
> u d >Oh, by the way, regarding email, I have no equal.
> c . >
> h >
>
Bob, you have WAY too much time on your hands... go directly to the shop and
make saw dust!!
mac
Please remove splinters before emailing