There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent somewhere...
:)
I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets of
3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home
Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
I didn't notice it till I got home and unloaded, but the faces of the
sheet had numerous blemishes and patches (both sides). I should have
looked it over better at the store, BEFORE I started cutting. :)
Thankfully, I managed to cut around the major blemishes, or hide them in
places where they can't be seen. Unfortunately, this left me a little
short, so now I need to pick up a quarter sheet to build the last two
shelves.
The plywood is also riddled with numerous voids. I don't think I have
made a cut yet that hasn't had pieces of the core falling out.
Even the grain pattern of the sheets is less than attractive. I'm not
sure what kind of birch trees they got the wood from, but this stuff is
ugly! :)
Perhaps worst of all, the surface veneers are extremely thin and fragile.
It appears to be thinner than a sheet of paper. I bought brand new saw
blades for making this project, and the chipout is absolutely horrible. I
also sanded a couple of pieces yesterday, and can sand through the veneer
in less than 20 seconds with 100 grit paper. Now my project is almost
finished, and I'm almost scared to sand it for fear of sanding through
the veneer and exposing the core.
Worst of all, I paid $40 a sheet for this stuff at Home Depot, and then
saw MUCH better quality lumber at Lowes (where I normally get my plywood)
for only $30 a sheet.
The plywood sucks, but a lot of the fault obviously lies with me. I made
the mistake of shopping on a weekend, when the rest of the DIY crowd was
crowding into the store. I thought the convenience of having my wife and
daughter there to help load the cart would be nice. But, in my attempt to
get in and out of the store, I didn't inspect the sheets closely enough.
Anyway, I'm almost finished with my entertainment center and am happy
with the way it is turning out. Despite the poor quality lumber, I have
managed to hide the worst blemishes. If I can pull off sanding the
project next week without destroying it, there's still a chance it might
turn out OK.
Live and learn...
Anthony
On May 25, 11:11 am, HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
> There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent somewhere...
> :)
>
> I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets of
> 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home
> Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
>
> I didn't notice it till I got home and unloaded, but the faces of the
> sheet had numerous blemishes and patches (both sides). I should have
> looked it over better at the store, BEFORE I started cutting. :)
> Thankfully, I managed to cut around the major blemishes, or hide them in
> places where they can't be seen. Unfortunately, this left me a little
> short, so now I need to pick up a quarter sheet to build the last two
> shelves.
>
> The plywood is also riddled with numerous voids. I don't think I have
> made a cut yet that hasn't had pieces of the core falling out.
>
> Even the grain pattern of the sheets is less than attractive. I'm not
> sure what kind of birch trees they got the wood from, but this stuff is
> ugly! :)
>
> Perhaps worst of all, the surface veneers are extremely thin and fragile.
> It appears to be thinner than a sheet of paper. I bought brand new saw
> blades for making this project, and the chipout is absolutely horrible. I
> also sanded a couple of pieces yesterday, and can sand through the veneer
> in less than 20 seconds with 100 grit paper. Now my project is almost
> finished, and I'm almost scared to sand it for fear of sanding through
> the veneer and exposing the core.
>
> Worst of all, I paid $40 a sheet for this stuff at Home Depot, and then
> saw MUCH better quality lumber at Lowes (where I normally get my plywood)
> for only $30 a sheet.
>
> The plywood sucks, but a lot of the fault obviously lies with me. I made
> the mistake of shopping on a weekend, when the rest of the DIY crowd was
> crowding into the store. I thought the convenience of having my wife and
> daughter there to help load the cart would be nice. But, in my attempt to
> get in and out of the store, I didn't inspect the sheets closely enough.
>
> Anyway, I'm almost finished with my entertainment center and am happy
> with the way it is turning out. Despite the poor quality lumber, I have
> managed to hide the worst blemishes. If I can pull off sanding the
> project next week without destroying it, there's still a chance it might
> turn out OK.
>
> Live and learn...
>
> Anthony
The Aruca (sp?) at Lowes is decent as far as splintering and has few
voids and it is cheaper than the Birch. Never tried staining it.
On May 25, 10:44 am, "efgh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> All the more reason to use solid wood instead of plywood.- Hide quoted text -
>
You bet. At about $5.5 a bf for clear birch here, that would make the
material cost around $450 when you include sales tax and a tiny bit of
waste. Makes great sense.
Then of course, you get to do the monster layup. I don't know if you
have ever glued up a really wide,long section of wood, but it can be
really hard to control well once you get past about 16" when doing
larger lengths. Plus with the crappy, poorly dried and conditioned
product we are sold today, my personal experience is that a really
large glue up is more of an adventure than an exercise in skill.
But - think of all the extra time in the shop doing glue ups! Extra
shop time for a much more difficult project, 5 times the price for
material... what's not to like?
Robert
On May 25, 10:44 am, HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
>Assuming I don't destroy the project when I start >sanding, it will all work out in the end.
You really need to be extra careful when sanding. I finished up some
tables for the VFW (utility type tables) and this was the material
that was in their budget.
I have never seen face veneer that thin. I don't think you could
spray it on any thinner. I sanded right through that stuff due to
some little bumps in the underlying substrate. Luckily, the face of
the pieces weren't all that interesting, so with some finish on the
top it didn't matter.
I used to buy the "China ply" at HD and it was a decent product. No
matter whose plywood it is, it won't be the baltic/russian/cabinet ply
stuff with no voids at all in the layers of wood, so that wasn't a big
thing.
But the faces on the stuff I bought last week were really bad. The
veneer splintered really badly, some of the pieces were covered with
footballs (plugs), and the pink glue they used to press the plies
together stunk like something was burning.
So for me that stuff has not been relegated to utility/paint grade
material.
I fear that if I go to my hardwood supplier though, his $60 a sheet
birch won't be that much better.
Robert
On May 25, 11:44 am, HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
> Leon,
>
> >> I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets
> >> of 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my
> >> local Home Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have
> >> ever purchased!
> > Learning to look at what you are buying is a good practice.
>
> Yeah, I usually inspect the lumber I buy with much greater detail, but I
> guess I was busy looking at my lady and talking with her instead. :)
>
> > BUT when the plywood becomes delaminated or pieces start falling out I
> > Take It Back. Sure it is cut but the piece is defective, how would
> > you know if you had not cut it?
>
> Good point, but it's all hindsight now. Assuming I don't destroy the
> project when I start sanding, it will all work out in the end.
>
> Anthony
I had a similar experience, but the real problem was in finishing it.
The oak veneer I got was so thin that the pores opened to the adhesive
surface underneath. The stain would not take on the adhesive, so I
had a poor stain job. I ended up having to use Mohawk's Blendal
sticks to correct it.
On May 25, 12:10 pm, Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Two (2) mistakes:
>
> 1) Walking thru the doors of Home Depot.
> 2) Thinking they even know what Birch cabinet plywood is, much less
> sell it.
>
> Plywood distributors exist for a reason.
>
> Lew
You know, as a sidebar to this, Home Depot sold quality plywood a few
years ago. (5?- 7?) It was the same stuff I got at my hardwoods guy,
even the same stamps sometimes. It was just a about 20% less.
Then they sold a hardwood faced ply that was called something like
"cabply" or "cabinet ply" with no claims as to what wood it was. It
was clear, had the appearance of first veneer cut ash, not anything at
all resemblign birch, but was very close grained. Not porous at all.
It came from Chile, so of course we called it Chiliply. I used a lot
of it for all kinds of things stained and painted.
Now they sell that junk. When I built the aforementioned tables, I
was really surprised as some of that stuff was a full 3/16" out of
square! OK, we are all past thinking that a sheet of >anything< is
square. But 3/16"?
My point is that when they sold the better stuff, there was a thriving
market for it. A lot of the cabinet guys and smaller contractors ate
that stuff up. Many times I would go to HD to get some, and they
would be out. At the price, it made wonderful small cabinets, paint
grade vanities, uitlity room cabinets, etc. I know it is a function
of money/time on the rack/bottom line, etc., but I can't figure out
why they QUIT carrying a better grade since it was selling. The sold
the daylights out of that stuff.
Now they have the Chinaply whenever I would want it. Problem is, I
don't. There is so much in the racks, apparently a lot of others
don't either.
Robert
On May 28, 11:45 am, "Upscale" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > In my quest to find a place to work and grow into, an option to buy a
> > strip-mall with light industrial zoning resulted in having a few
> > meetings with a few 'doers'. The place was simply too big for just
> > lill' ol' me and I wanted to offset my financial commitments.
>
> Where was this "almost to be" working environment? Would be bureaucrats
> aside, it would brighten my day at even the possibility of something like
> that within travelling distance from where I live.
>
7000 sq ft. Asking $ 440,000.00, Sarnia...about 3 hour drive.
On Sat, 26 May 2007 11:35:57 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>European fuel taxes go to the general funds, generally speaking, they
>aren't dedicated AFAIK.
Thanks, it appears that I misunderstood this.
>The European experience is also if you build it,
>they will come, or traffic will fill the roads no matter how much is
>built and widened.
The US does the same, as well as designing areas where everyone lives
at one end of the road and works at the other.
>Traffic jams should (IMHO) be encouraged so that more
>will be spent on (subsidized) public transportation, which is also more
>energy efficient.
I agree with that, as well as letting an unimpeded market set fuel
prices.
On May 25, 1:56 pm, HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > the pink glue they used to press the plies
> > together stunk like something was burning.
>
> Interesting, I noticed that smell when I was making some cuts, but didn't
> see any signs of burning on the wood.
>
> Anthony
Nothing burned, it just smelled like it. That was the confusing
part. I am sure the Chinaply is bound by something made from boiled
animals and food remnants.
Just as a tip, if you are going to edge this stuff, put your edging up
a little where you can, covering the edge plus a little and then sand
by hand to get down to the whisper of veneer.
Robert
Just out of boredom, I went by HD at lunch today. This was in Fort
Smith, Arkansas. I noticed they had two kinds of birch ply. One was
labeled "3/4 inch birch plywood" and sold for 39.00. The other was
labeled "3/4 inch Classic birch plywood" and sold for 29.00. Both
were stamped "Made in China". I didn't ask what the difference was
because I knew no one working there would know. Anyone have a clue? I
miss Jerry's Home Center in Eugene Oregon.
On May 25, 11:53 pm, [email protected] (Larry W) wrote:
> Welcome to the wonderful world of modern materials. I've used the birch
> and oak ply from both Lowes and Home Depot. I never let 100 grit or anything
> coarser than 150 get anywhere near it. As you've noticed, the face veneer
> is extremely thin. I don't think there's much you can do do change this
> without a time machine.
>
> --
> When the game is over, the pawn and the king are returned to the same box.
>
> Larry Wasserman - Baltimore Maryland - lwasserm(a)sdf. lonestar.org
Larry,
I in Balto as well. The last batch of HD oak ply I bought (about 5
sheets) was horrible. Thin veneer as you said, but it seems to me
that the glue is crap. Unacceptable splintering on crosscuts (to the
veneer) and wonderful suprise voids. Recently I used Freestate
Timbers for solid hardwood. Who do you use for quality hardwood
plywood?
Dave - Parkville
On May 25, 11:11 am, HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
> There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent somewhere...
> :)
>
> I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets of
> 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home
> Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
...
It's paint grade. Shellac isn't the only favorite finish on this ng.
On May 26, 8:27 am, "Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "HerHusband" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
>
>
> > Perhaps worst of all, the surface veneers are extremely thin and fragile.
> > It appears to be thinner than a sheet of paper. I bought brand new saw
> > blades for making this project, and the chipout is absolutely horrible. I
> > also sanded a couple of pieces yesterday, and can sand through the veneer
> > in less than 20 seconds with 100 grit paper. Now my project is almost
> > finished, and I'm almost scared to sand it for fear of sanding through
> > the veneer and exposing the core.
>
> > Worst of all, I paid $40 a sheet for this stuff at Home Depot, and then
> > saw MUCH better quality lumber at Lowes (where I normally get my plywood)
> > for only $30 a sheet.
>
> THD has a 30 day satisfaction return policy on just about everything. You'd
> be surprised at what they will allow to be returned. You should have
> returned the plywood when you noticed it was so substandard. They will also
> price match, plus a 10% kicker on any competitor's like product.
>
> I have a problem with all of the posts here about lumber that guys go out
> and buy (... and select from the pile themselves), and then post complaints
> about the inferior quality of such things as should have been obvious when
> they were buying it. Plys are easy to see, right on the rack. Fills are
> easy to see. Shame on you for not taking the time to look it over better,
> but why post a vent about how crummy the product is when you are the one who
> selected it?
>
> --
>
> -Mike-
> [email protected]
Mike,
In my case, I knew I was buying lower quality at $40 sheet for oak
plywood. I was making a base for a workbench (someone gave me a solid
core door). I knew the veneer was thin, but this was OK for my
purpose. The biggest problem I had was with the glue holding the
veneer on. It seemed weak and I think contributed to the chipping on
the cross cuts. All in all my base is fine. The quality was just
lower than low. (not to mention the crappy looking dark wood mixed in
with the plys - but as you said, I saw that when I bought it)
Dave
On May 26, 11:47 am, HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> > THD has a 30 day satisfaction return policy on just about everything.
> > You'd be surprised at what they will allow to be returned.
>
> I guess I figured wood was one of those "non-returnable" items. Like buying
> anything electrical at an autoparts store. Especially after I have cut it.
>
> > I have a problem with all of the posts here about lumber that guys go
> > out and buy (... and select from the pile themselves), and then post
> > complaints about the inferior quality of such things as should have
> > been obvious when they were buying it.
>
> In my case, it's not like I have many options. Home Depot or Lowes are
> about it for cabinet plywood. There used to be a hardwood supplier in town,
> but they closed down a few years ago. Some of the lumber yards "might" have
> cabinet ply, but it's not typically out where you can see it. You usually
> have to pay first, and hope there's something good when you drive back to
> pick it up.
>
> So, I guess I figured plywood is plywood, and would be about the same
> everywhere. Like I said, live and learn...
>
> > Plys are easy to see, right on the rack. Fills are easy to see.
> > Shame on you for not taking the time to look it over better
>
> In all fairness, I "did" examine the sheets in the store. I dug through
> several sheets to find the best three in the stack. But even the "best" had
> problems. I also didn't notice any real voids in the ply's on the edge.
> Maybe one or two small ones, but I had no idea the whole sheet was filled
> with them.
>
> As for the thin veneer, it's not visible to the naked eye. What I
> "thought" was the veneer layer on each side was actually just another core
> ply. Even after cutting and intensely examining a small piece, I can't see
> the veneer layer. It's that thin...
>
> I also had no way of knowing the wood would splinter so badly when
> crosscut, until I cut into it.
Use a zero clearance plate to support the board right up to the
blade. Make two
passes. First cut should be a light scratch to score the veneer,
followed by a
second, full thickness cut. That applies whether you're sawing cheap
HD
ply or expensive furniture grade.
On May 25, 3:23 pm, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I just got a quote from my hardwood dealer yesterday for 3/4"x4x8 A1 rift
> sawn red oak - $115.95/sheet; up $11/sheet since I bought the last load just
> about one year ago.
>
> Inflation? ... what inflation?
No shit, eh? Some pundits insist it has to do with fuel costs and
exchange rates.
I'm thinking multi-million dollar exec bonuses can't help either.
Inflation is a dirty word with ANY ruling party. They all want you to
think that they have the economy under control.
But you can't keep pouring mega-billions into a bonfire and you can't
keep printing more to make up for it without causing inflation.
But you know what? It has never, ever been different. The biggest
difference is that we have a better, more accurate view of the mess,
due to accelerated information sharing.
It is a bit like riding through a sewer in a glass-bottomed boat.
Donkey and elephant turds all stink.
On May 25, 5:44 pm, "EXT" <[email protected]> wrote:
> What most Americans don't know is that the US currency is in the toilet. I
> run a Canadian company which has 99% of its income in US dollars. Our
> revenue is up but when converted to Canadian dollars it becomes less than
> years before. I used to get $1.60 Canadian for every one US dollar, now I
> only get $1.08 per US dollar and the experts say that the two currencies
> will be par by year end.
>
> This means that whatever you bought a couple of years ago that was imported,
> now it is going to cost you almost 50% more today because the other
> currencies in the world have not dropped as much as the US dollar.
>
> Home Depot, Wal-Mart and many others compensate by buying even cheaper crap
> so that the price doesn't go up, that is why the plywood is now pure junk.
>
Precisely. Well put.
On May 26, 2:29 pm, Dave Balderstone
<dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, Lew
>
>
>
> Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Brian Henderson wrote:
>
> > > There really is no way to have effective mass transit in Southern
> > > California without tearing down the entire state and starting over.
> > > It just wasn't designed that way. Most of the currently existing mass
> > > transit we have runs nearly empty because it just doesn't fulfill the
> > > needs of the majority of potential users.
>
> > Seems there may be a change underway.
>
> > Trying to use the mass transit system to get someplace in a hurry, is
> > a lost cause at present; however, every time I ride the light rail, it
> > is full, especially the Long Beach run.
>
> > Other "commuter" runs are showing an increase in ridership.
>
> > Personally, would like to see $10/gal gasoline.
>
> > Suddenly, there would be a whole new way of looking at things.
>
> In some places. Here in Canada, it would have a nasty economic impact
> because of the huge distances we have to move goods, both imported and
> for export. It would kill western Canadian farmers.
Question would be, where would the yield of that huge increase go?
Who knows, maybe we can start over and move stuff the efficient way
again? Like trains?
What's with all them damned trucks on the road?
The farmers could simply say: "If you want this farking grain, come
and get it, you asshats!!"
But I'm afraid you're right, Dave... it would kill them first.
On the imported goods front, maybe we'd get off our collective asses
and start making our own plywood again?
On May 26, 1:38 pm, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here in Houston we are burdened with these extra long, >foul smelling, smoke spewing, articulated buses that'll >hold around 100, half full.
>
> In 20 years I don't think I've ever seen one with more > than 6 passengers, including the driver.
Witnessed that myself on many a time. But I always thought the
billows of unburned fuel were to help with the mosquito population..
no?
The only time I saw a lot of folks on public transportation there in
Houston was when they opened the downtown rail. Jeez... I remember
how hard some fought that. I was actually there when they ticketed a
lady and towed her car because she parked on the tracks and wouldn't
move her car - not even for the train.
Robert
On May 26, 1:14 pm, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
SNIP
> But you know what? It has never, ever been different. >The biggest difference is that we have a better, more >accurate view of the mess, due to accelerated >information sharing.
>
> It is a bit like riding through a sewer in a glass-bottomed >boat. Donkey and elephant turds all stink.
Well said. I absolutely couldn't agree more. It is stupid beyond all
description to think that governmental waste and stupidity is
something new.
And with our political party system, it is hard to tell one from the
other these days as they will tell you anything you want to hear to
get elected and stay in office.
They all suck, it just depends on how you want your poison.
Robert
On May 26, 3:02 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
[schnipferizectomy]
>
> And with our political party system, it is hard to tell one from the
> other these days as they will tell you anything you want to hear to
> get elected and stay in office.
No different here in Canuckistan.
But that blantant sell-out of the Dems, for a paltry 20 billion in
pork, so they could give Chimp his 100 billion is extortion, pure and
simple. I let you have 20 if you give me my 100. That Pelosi is as big
a piece of shit as that DeLay was.
As long as it costs half a billion to get elected POTUS, big business
will always dictate who it is going to be. That is especially handy
these days with corruptable electronic voting machines.
This will go on and on and on. So will the attempts to take away the
right to bear arms..can't have the serfs too pissed, you know...
But... maybe 100 years from now our children's children will have
their own Bastille Day.
And just because I want to help the poor, that doesn't disqualify me
from drawing a bead on the first fool who wants to send my kids off to
a foreign land to fetch some oil for the governor's Hummer.
> They all suck, it just depends on how you want your poison.
I'll take mine from a tap at the pub. Freedom through death, one pint
at the time..(I'll be 100)
On May 25, 5:10 pm, Mike in Arkansas <[email protected]> wrote:
...
> ... two kinds of birch ply. One was
> labeled "3/4 inch birch plywood" and sold for 39.00. The other was
> labeled "3/4 inch Classic birch plywood" and sold for 29.00. Both
> were stamped "Made in China". I didn't ask what the difference was...
$10/sheet...
On May 26, 6:16 pm, "HeyBub" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> *Fewer military deaths in six years of Afghanistan/Iraq war than in 8 years
> of the previous administration's peace years.
Excuse me?
On May 27, 2:13 pm, "EXT" <[email protected]> wrote:
[schnipperectomized]
>
> Enough said, this is a thread about rising costs for wood products while
> quality is going down in the US, not about Toronto's mismanagement of money.
My company sold and installed quite a few solid surface countertops in
Michigan when the exhange was $1.55. I was getting full margins and
the US customer had a built-in fabulous discount.
I haven't done any serious business in Michigan for 2 years now.
I do get a break buying stuff in Michigan for my business and personal
use.
On May 27, 10:39 pm, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote:
> or does it mean 'develop a plan and take action'?
>
But FIRST we do a feasibility study to see if the desired path
warrants a steering committee in order to fund a research group in
order to see if we can synchronise all the lobbies and focus groups to
make discoveries to establish re-electabilty. After they write a
proposal to investigate the ramifications due to financial and
environmental impact of any and all proposals...when we get that all
ironed out, it's time to move on to the next big step: we drum up
support by printing leaflets which we will hand out at all the White
Castle outlets. THEN we develop a plan. As long as it doesn't impact
the Slippy-Bellied Snail population and/or the spotted owls. Oh.. and
we need to hire some lawyers.
Is that what you mean, Morris?
o=BFo
(tongue firmly planted in cheek)
On May 28, 1:26 am, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ever the optimist, I keep hoping that "addressing the problem" will
> mean more than just endlessly (re)specifying the problem.
>
> Robatoy summarized the solution process fairly well and reminded me
> that it's not that we lack practical solutions, it's that we lack the
> will to implement.
>
In my quest to find a place to work and grow into, an option to buy a
strip-mall with light industrial zoning resulted in having a few
meetings with a few 'doers'. The place was simply too big for just
lill' ol' me and I wanted to offset my financial commitments. I
offered a symbiotic environment to a few small contractors which
bolted on to what it is I do. they included a high-end tile merchant
and a hardwood flooring installer. We've all know each other for years
and felt we had a marvellous opportunity.
The property in question had been a water treatment plant for bottled
water and some of the stainless tanks were still there, left for
scrap.
I noticed a little tag dangling from one of the valves which
instructed me to get in touch with an agency regarding the
'decommissioning' of installed equipment.
The meetings that ensued could have been straight from a horror
movie.... a psychological thriller. Marquis deSade with an MBA and
sandals and some training in extortion.
He spent an hour with his Powerpoint presentation explaining how
incredibly powerful and important he was. He then handed out 10-pound
1000-page questionnaires (ok, I am embellishing a little here) and it
went down-hill from there. About an hour later, as I scanned the room,
I saw faces looking at me with 'WTF' eyes and it was instantly clear
that the meeting had come to an abrupt end. As I snapped my briefcase
closed, I heard the simultaneous snapping of the other briefcases, and
we were outta there.
I thanked the bureaucrat for his time and told him I'd be in touch.
That farktard was going to bury us in bullshit so he could justify his
existence.
We were there to get going, to get started, roll up sleeves and go
nuts...he was there to make sure that wasn't going to happen. Almost a
year later, that building is still sitting there... and farktard is
wringing his hands looking for somebody who wants to play his game.
On May 31, 9:51 am, HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So, today I'm going to start applying the finish coats of >polyurethane. That will probably take a few days to >complete. I'll try to post some
> pictures in the binaries newsgroup when I'm finished.
>
> Take care,
>
> Anthony
Sounds like you got it licked. Good for you! I for one would like to
see your work and hope you post some pics.
Robert
On May 25, 1:49 pm, HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All the more reason to use solid wood instead of plywood.
>
> It's hard to beat the cost and stability of plywood, and solid wood has
> it's own share of issues. Warping, cupping, splitting, etc. I did buy a lot
> of solid wood for trim, drawer fronts, etc. and it's not picture perfect
> either.
>
> Of course, then there's the issue of gluing up panels and the labor (and
> goofs) involved with that.
>
> Anthony
I buy solid wood and hardwoodplywoods at www.creativewoodworksusa.com
Birch is only $1.95 per foot and plywoods are around $35.They will
ship and it isn't as expensive as I thought it would be for shipping.
HerHusband wrote:
> Because of the blemishes in my full sheets, I had to run down and
> pick up another 1/4 sheet of 3/4" plywood today. I didn't want to
> spring for a full sheet, and Lowes was out of the precut panels, so
> it was back to Home Depot.
snip
> Anthony
If I recall your local to me (Vancouver area).....have you ever tried
Shurway(on St. Johns rd)?.....they have quite a selection of hardwood ply
(lots), hardwood lumber and other interesting odds and ends. Prices seem
competitive and even sometimes low. I haven't bought full sheets lately but
last fall they had stacks of 2ft by 4ft birch panels (less than $8.00 ea)
that worked great for a few small projects.....Rod
Lew Hodgett wrote:
> EXT wrote:
>> What most Americans don't know is that the US currency is in the
>> toilet. I run a Canadian company which has 99% of its income in US
>> dollars. <snip>
>
> Didn't realize the Canadian situation; however, I can tell you that
> the USD is also in the tank vs the Euro.
>
> Spending money you don't have, to finance a war, will do that.
>
> Lew
Not really....the massive trade deficit will do that.....tis a function of
floating currency values. As we import massive quantities of expensive oil,
Natural gas, Chinese everything etc. other countries can only hold on to so
much U.S. currency before the relative currency value goes down. Imports may
cost more but American products become more competitive and U.S. jobs
increase....In fact our deficit spending keeps relative currency values from
plummeting further since exporters buy our "notes" with their excess U.S.
currency.......Rod
Morris Dovey wrote:
> Actually, most Americans /do/ know it. If you look at it from the
> outside, then the dollar is in the tank - and when you look at it from
> the inside, then the cost of everything bought with dollars is
> skyrocketing. Either way, it's the same inflation.
Uh, no. The current inflation rate of about 34% compares favorably with the
inflation rate of 2000-06 of 2.45%, 1990-99 of 3.0%, and 1980-89 of 5.55%.
"Skyrocketing" ocurred during the Carter years: 1970-79 7.09%
>
> What most Americans don't seem to recognize is that it's all happening
> in a completely predictable "cause and effect" sequence, and that the
> current level of inflation is merely a gentle introduction...
Very gentle. Productivity, GDP, and personal income all exceed inflation.
>
>> This means that whatever you bought a couple of years ago that was
>> imported, now it is going to cost you almost 50% more today because
>> the other currencies in the world have not dropped as much as the
>> US dollar.
Nothing bought two years ago costs 50% more today (except maybe energy). Not
steel, aluminum, grain, manganese, or manufactured goods.
>
> It's not just imported goods - the cost of doing business in the US is
> being affected and the cost of domestic goods is on the same track as
> imported goods. It's just a little further back on the train because a
> lot of American businesses are dragging their feet on raising prices.
>
> There's not much good anywhere in the picture. As the US dollar drops
> relative to other currencies, Americans will necessarily cut back on
> their purchases of imported goods - leaving exporters with excessive
> inventory, excessive capacity, and excessive employment. Worse, or at
> least as bad, obligations payable in US dollars will be paid in
> devalued currency (which you're already experiencing).
>
>> Home Depot, Wal-Mart and many others compensate by buying even
>> cheaper crap so that the price doesn't go up, that is why the
>> plywood is now pure junk.
>
> That can only be carried so far. At some point the merchandise becomes
> so crappy that no one wants to buy it, the prices are forced up anyway
> to the point where the merchandise becomes unaffordable, and the
> commercial structure needs to be rebuilt.
This has never happened in the past, but your predictions of economic mayhem
are just as valid as other economists.
>
> About then some damn political cowboy will come along and tell us:
> "Hey! War is _good_ for business."
Well, it is. GDP increased 26% from 2000 to 2005 ($9.8 to $12.4 trillion) or
about $3,000 per person in constant 2000 dollars.
This, coupled with a net saving in military lives*, makes war a win-win
scenario.
====
*Fewer military deaths in six years of Afghanistan/Iraq war than in 8 years
of the previous administration's peace years.
Robatoy wrote:
> On May 26, 3:02 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> As long as it costs half a billion to get elected POTUS, big business
> will always dictate who it is going to be.
How so? You do know the individual limit on campaign contribution is just a
thousand or two, corporations can't officially buy their way in.... although
speech, book and Presidential libraries do allow rewards beyond
oversight.......The media's favorite candidate does get a leg up on the
process(free & biased coverage) but often as not the voters reject the
chosen darling
>That is especially handy
> these days with corruptable electronic voting machines.
Agreed....Without a paper trail it is not a question of if but rather when.
Our state has moved to "mail ballots only" of which is as bad .....Even
worse we lose a sense of community and patriotism.....Our family including
the grown kids would gather prior to a election to discuss issues and
candidates then troop down in mass to vote together (same
district)......when the youngest came of age we documented the vote with
pictures and a voting pizza party
Rod
Han wrote:
> Don't know whether it would. It might kill a bit of the road and auto
> industry, but people will need food. Currently (at least here in
> North Jersey) there is a growing "need" for people to feel good and
> shop for groceries/veggies/whatever that is grown "nearby".
a tiny yuppie filled feel good niche.....The other 80% depend on the
efficient farm or the norm.....Incidentally even local farms require lots of
fuel for tractors and equipment .......Transportation of crops to the market
accounts for a tiny slice.
That
> would impact faraway growers as well, be they West Canadians or
> Australians. IMHO, things that will reduce petroleum production are
> good, for very many reasons.
The Sierra club would be proud however sloppy thinking is still slop
.....personal affordable transportation based on oil has done more for the
"everyday man" than almost any other 20th century invention.......The
freedom for work, play and life necessities would fill volumes. The very
fact that virtually all alternatives require massive subsidies often as not
from oil itself to become remotely viable tells volumes....we have to make a
"good thing" pay for those things "not so good'...doesn't this beg the
question of why? Rod
CW wrote:
> If you can't think of ways around that, you're not thinking very hard.
I covered that under "speech, book and Presidential libraries" nonetheless
the $100-200 million or whatever directly raised for a presidential election
is from "small" contributors.....without this support it is not going to
happen .... not to mention that most "big business" contribute to both
parties to hedge their bets. Rod
Doug Miller wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, "HeyBub"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Morris Dovey wrote:
>>> Actually, most Americans /do/ know it. If you look at it from the
>>> outside, then the dollar is in the tank - and when you look at it
>>> from the inside, then the cost of everything bought with dollars is
>>> skyrocketing. Either way, it's the same inflation.
>>
>> Uh, no. The current inflation rate of about 34% compares favorably
>> with the
> ^^^
> Isn't there supposed to be a decimal point in there somewhere?
Yeah. My bad. 3.4%.
Robatoy wrote:
> On May 26, 6:16 pm, "HeyBub" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> *Fewer military deaths in six years of Afghanistan/Iraq war than in
>> 8 years of the previous administration's peace years.
>
> Excuse me?
The US has been fighting the War on Terror for over 5 years and has lost
just over half the soldiers in battle as the Clinton Administration was
losing during peacetime in 8 years.
In five years of the WOT, the US has lost about 3800 soldiers, from all
causes (hostile action, training, accidents, homicide, disease, suicide,
etc.), during wartime. In 8 years of the previous administration, the US
lost 7,500 active duty military personell.
http://www.murdoconline.net/archives/004581.html
Robatoy wrote:
>
> My company sold and installed quite a few solid surface countertops in
> Michigan when the exhange was $1.55. I was getting full margins and
> the US customer had a built-in fabulous discount.
> I haven't done any serious business in Michigan for 2 years now.
> I do get a break buying stuff in Michigan for my business and personal
> use.
Michigan is an economic basket case. And there is a move afoot to raise
taxes even more.
Poor Michigan. Shame, really.
Lew Hodgett wrote:
> Morris Dovey wrote:
>
>> That doesn't bode well. Consider the lessons of Katrina...
>
> I'm not sure how that relates.
>
> The natural disaster of Katrina, turned the light of reality on
> blatant racism as well as complete government indifference and
> incompetence at all levels, especially federal; however, none of that
> relates to alternate energy pursuits, IMHO.
I don't see how you can accuse the federal government of incompetence. Oh
sure, mistakes were made, but there will always be mistakes when billions of
dollars worth of stuff and people have to move in a short time.
Better to look at what the federal government DID do properly - and by
"properly" I mean within the law and according to the requests of local and
state officials.
Remember, the feds can't do much of anything unless asked by local
functionaries. It's sad that the feds were hamstrung by the stunning
incompetence of the local folk. For example, there were enough school busses
to take a goodly portion of the people in the dome all the way to Houston
(one "stolen" bus made the trip).
Lew Hodgett wrote:
> HeyBub wrote:
>
>> I don't see how you can accuse the federal government of
>> incompetence.
>
> Let me spell it out for you: BUSH
>
> He has proven to be unqualified as well as arrogant, and has
> surrounded himself with like kind.
>
> The systematic dismantling of gov't seems to be their only objective
> and they are doing a pretty good job of it.
>
> The wealthy get wealthier, the poor get poorer, and the middle class
> gets screwed.
>
> Ain't life grand?
>
> Lew
And yet in your rant in spite of Bush's grave incompetence you failed to
provide a single fact.......Reality a bit hard for you? Rod
In article <[email protected]>, Lew
Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Brian Henderson wrote:
>
> > There really is no way to have effective mass transit in Southern
> > California without tearing down the entire state and starting over.
> > It just wasn't designed that way. Most of the currently existing mass
> > transit we have runs nearly empty because it just doesn't fulfill the
> > needs of the majority of potential users.
>
> Seems there may be a change underway.
>
> Trying to use the mass transit system to get someplace in a hurry, is
> a lost cause at present; however, every time I ride the light rail, it
> is full, especially the Long Beach run.
>
> Other "commuter" runs are showing an increase in ridership.
>
> Personally, would like to see $10/gal gasoline.
>
> Suddenly, there would be a whole new way of looking at things.
In some places. Here in Canada, it would have a nasty economic impact
because of the huge distances we have to move goods, both imported and
for export. It would kill western Canadian farmers.
On May 30, 9:55 am, "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
>
>
> > On May 29, 9:46 am, Charlie Self <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Actually, he probably figured everyone read the dialy >newspapers
>
> > Thank the heavens above we can all trust the press, eh?
> > Where would we be without their bright light of truth...
>
> > Here's a great example of the press in action during Katrina:
>
> > http://www.metacafe.com/watch/39162/south_park_katrina/
>
> > And for anyone that actually watches it, yes, I know, it's a cartoon.
> > But it confused me for a while as I couldn't tell it from the
> > jackasses in the regular press.
>
> > Robert
>
> Cartoon caracters, but actually how it play out.
> Having been through a disaster like that, the people themselves have to take
> responsibility in helping them selves. Fema could have been there moments
> after the storm and there would still would have been the devestation and
> the people with out homes. It was a natural disaster of epic proportions.
> Not a whole lot was reported about the winds of the storm which was the
> really dangerous part. More was reported on the water after the storm. Too
> bad the mayor let the school buses sit and be flooded. Before hand planing
> and prefaration was the real problem.
Billions were spent to be prepared for an eventuality like that. Which
pockets it all ended up in nobody knows....lemme guess...General
Dynamics? Raytheon? Lockheed?..surely some defense contractor must
have made some money off the fear of the ordinary citizens?
Scared of the weather? We'll just create an agency just for you. We'll
take your tax dollars and line the pockets of a whole whack of
appointees and then then when the shit hits the fan, we'll find a high-
profile scapegoat.
And remember boys and girls, don't forget to be scared of:
(select as many as you want)
mushroom clouds
poisoned gas
hurricanes
floods
ragheads
anti-semites
global warming
exploding dust collectors
mysterious white powders
softwood lumber subsidies
mad cows (aka Hillary)
aliens
tidal waves
foreign languages
culture
good manners
people who are nice
truth.
We have the people in place to help!
(okay, they might be a little busy overseas right now, and the
remnants on the home-front are a bit short of leadership)
"Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Billions were spent to be prepared for an eventuality like that. Which
> pockets it all ended up in nobody knows....lemme guess...General
> Dynamics? Raytheon? Lockheed?..surely some defense contractor must
> have made some money off the fear of the ordinary citizens?
> Scared of the weather? We'll just create an agency just for you. We'll
> take your tax dollars and line the pockets of a whole whack of
> appointees and then then when the shit hits the fan, we'll find a high-
> profile scapegoat.
The real crying shame is the fact that assistance was offered before the
storm to help prevent this kind of human tragity from happening in the first
place. Get the people out before the flooding. But uh Oh noooo... said
the mayor and the govenor. We got it under control. And speaking of being
ready for the storm, I recall a reporter interviewing NO's head guy for
emergency management 2 days before the storm it. The reporter asked what
have you done to prepair for the storm? The answer was sweet and short. To
sum it up, nothing was done. The second question, are you ready? The
answer was something like, we hoped this would not happen on our watch.
In article <[email protected]>,
Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 26, 2:29 pm, Dave Balderstone
> <dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>, Lew
> >
> >
> >
> > Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Brian Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > > There really is no way to have effective mass transit in Southern
> > > > California without tearing down the entire state and starting over.
> > > > It just wasn't designed that way. Most of the currently existing mass
> > > > transit we have runs nearly empty because it just doesn't fulfill the
> > > > needs of the majority of potential users.
> >
> > > Seems there may be a change underway.
> >
> > > Trying to use the mass transit system to get someplace in a hurry, is
> > > a lost cause at present; however, every time I ride the light rail, it
> > > is full, especially the Long Beach run.
> >
> > > Other "commuter" runs are showing an increase in ridership.
> >
> > > Personally, would like to see $10/gal gasoline.
> >
> > > Suddenly, there would be a whole new way of looking at things.
> >
> > In some places. Here in Canada, it would have a nasty economic impact
> > because of the huge distances we have to move goods, both imported and
> > for export. It would kill western Canadian farmers.
>
> Question would be, where would the yield of that huge increase go?
> Who knows, maybe we can start over and move stuff the efficient way
> again? Like trains?
That would require Parliament to do something. Fat chance.
> What's with all them damned trucks on the road?
And there's a shortage of something like 30,000 drivers in Canada...
>
> The farmers could simply say: "If you want this farking grain, come
> and get it, you asshats!!"
>
> But I'm afraid you're right, Dave... it would kill them first.
>
> On the imported goods front, maybe we'd get off our collective asses
> and start making our own plywood again?
That would be a good thing. There are a whole lot of mills that would
restart.
In article <[email protected]>, Lew
Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dave Balderstone wrote:
>
> > In some places. Here in Canada, it would have a nasty economic impact
> > because of the huge distances we have to move goods, both imported and
> > for export. It would kill western Canadian farmers.
>
> You know, I doubt that.
>
> What you are suggesting is that the way of life of the Canadian grain
> farmer would be put in peril, and they would just give up and quit farming.
>
> When the human animal's survival is attacked, they can be very
> resourceful and adaptable.
>
> My money would be on the farmers.
As an aside, I work for the largest agricultural newspaper in Canada. I
understand the resilience of the farmer, but I also understand the
market and financial pressures they're under here in the prairies.
I'm not suggesting they'd give up. I'm suggesting they'd be forced into
bankruptcy.
On May 28, 6:42 pm, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
> But just wait until the huge landslip occurs at Cumbre Vieja on La
> Palma in the Canary Islands. Above sea level or not the entire
> eastern seaboard will be under water much deeper (as in about half a
> MILE deeper) than New Orleans ever was.
>
> The only hope? Grab a surfboard, put Surfin' USA on your Ipod, kiss
> your ass goodbye and ride that wave.
>
Ohhh, and don't forget your tinfoil hat!
Mike wrote:
> New Orleans is manageable with the right funding and engineering
> knowledge, being heavily populated by blacks doesn't help secure the
> right funding though, if it were somewhere "paler" then you could
> guarantee the money would be provided.
>
What is with this steady race drumbeat?.......The state is only 1/3
minority...does this mean that the 2/3 white population is somehow deprived
racially as well?
Incidentally Louisiana earns a billion and half annually from Gulf
oil/natural gas royalties, maybe some of that windfall should be put to
proper use. Rod
In article <[email protected]>,
Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 28, 6:42 pm, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > But just wait until the huge landslip occurs at Cumbre Vieja on La
> > Palma in the Canary Islands. Above sea level or not the entire
> > eastern seaboard will be under water much deeper (as in about half a
> > MILE deeper) than New Orleans ever was.
> >
> > The only hope? Grab a surfboard, put Surfin' USA on your Ipod, kiss
> > your ass goodbye and ride that wave.
> >
>
> Ohhh, and don't forget your tinfoil hat!
>
<http://eclectech.co.uk/mindcontrol.php>
;-)
On Mon, 28 May 2007 20:41:35 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>Well, half or so of the Netherlands is below sea level. Yes it gives
>problems, but that's why they have engineers. Most of the time it works
>very well. Sometimes it doesn't (January 1953 was bad), and a new "plan"
>is instituted. Somewhere there is a lesson or two in that experience for
>New Orleans.
Most of the Netherlands doesn't have a choice, there's nowhere else to
build. New Orleans does. It's moronic to rebuild somewhere that has
constant problems, as New Orleans always has, when you can build it
somewhere else without those problems.
"Mike" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> New Orleans is manageable with the right funding and engineering
> knowledge, being heavily populated by blacks doesn't help secure the
> right funding though, if it were somewhere "paler" then you could
> guarantee the money would be provided.
I believe that NO would be managable with the right management. IIRC a lot
of money that should have gone into securing the city went into polititions
pockets.
On Mon, 28 May 2007 20:13:05 GMT, Brian Henderson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, 28 May 2007 03:25:44 -0500, "todd" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Would that be the "don't build a large city below sea level" lesson or
>>another one?
>
>And the morons want to build it BELOW SEA LEVEL AGAIN!!!!!
>
>Some people never learn.
New Orleans is manageable with the right funding and engineering
knowledge, being heavily populated by blacks doesn't help secure the
right funding though, if it were somewhere "paler" then you could
guarantee the money would be provided.
But just wait until the huge landslip occurs at Cumbre Vieja on La
Palma in the Canary Islands. Above sea level or not the entire
eastern seaboard will be under water much deeper (as in about half a
MILE deeper) than New Orleans ever was.
The only hope? Grab a surfboard, put Surfin' USA on your Ipod, kiss
your ass goodbye and ride that wave.
--
Fri, May 25, 2007, 10:11am (EDT-1) [email protected] (HerHusband) doth
lament:
<snip> Worst of all, I paid $40 a sheet for this stuff at Home Depot,
and then saw MUCH better quality lumber at Lowes (where I normally get
my plywood) for only $30 a sheet. <snip>
Going by your description, the lsst plywood I bought at Lowes,
cnstruction grade, for shop projects, was better then what you got, and
ran me about $13 a sheet - the good side actually was. I don't shop at
Home Depot, period.
JOAT
What is life without challenge and a constant stream of new
humiliations?
- Peter Egan
[email protected] wrote:
> I know it is a function
> of money/time on the rack/bottom line, etc., but I can't figure out
> why they QUIT carrying a better grade since it was selling. The sold
> the daylights out of that stuff.
It's known as "bean counter mentality".
If you want to quickly destroy a business, put a bean counter in charge.
The examples are numerous.
1) L Townsend at Chrysler
2) R Smith at GM
They are the first to come to mind, but there are others.
Lew
What most Americans don't know is that the US currency is in the toilet. I
run a Canadian company which has 99% of its income in US dollars. Our
revenue is up but when converted to Canadian dollars it becomes less than
years before. I used to get $1.60 Canadian for every one US dollar, now I
only get $1.08 per US dollar and the experts say that the two currencies
will be par by year end.
This means that whatever you bought a couple of years ago that was imported,
now it is going to cost you almost 50% more today because the other
currencies in the world have not dropped as much as the US dollar.
Home Depot, Wal-Mart and many others compensate by buying even cheaper crap
so that the price doesn't go up, that is why the plywood is now pure junk.
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>> You know, as a sidebar to this, Home Depot sold quality plywood a few
>> years ago. (5?- 7?) It was the same stuff I got at my hardwoods guy,
>> even the same stamps sometimes. It was just a about 20% less.
>
> You're right ... last time I got good Oak 3/4" ply from HD was around
> 2002.
> IIRC, it was around $42/sheet, which was a pretty good price at the time,
> void free, relatively thick veneer compared to the higher wood boutique
> prices, and much heavier than what they sell as plywood at any BORG today.
>
> I just got a quote from my hardwood dealer yesterday for 3/4"x4x8 A1 rift
> sawn red oak - $115.95/sheet; up $11/sheet since I bought the last load
> just
> about one year ago.
>
> Inflation? ... what inflation?
>
> --
> www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 2/20/07
> KarlC@ (the obvious)
>
>
>
On Sun, 27 May 2007 10:55:17 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>Of course, that's why we bicycle or walk rather than use the car, whenever
>we can.
I do the same, and only drove to work twice in May. I'm seeing more
and more folks out there on bikes! Short trips are the most
inefficient, and are actually fun to walk or bike!
The overall MPG on my Tacoma goes up 3+ MPG when I remove most of the
trips under a one way distance of 2 miles.
B A R R Y <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007 10:55:17 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>
>>Of course, that's why we bicycle or walk rather than use the car,
>>whenever we can.
>
> I do the same, and only drove to work twice in May. I'm seeing more
> and more folks out there on bikes! Short trips are the most
> inefficient, and are actually fun to walk or bike!
>
> The overall MPG on my Tacoma goes up 3+ MPG when I remove most of the
> trips under a one way distance of 2 miles.
>
Although it is under 20 miles from home to work (07410 to 23rd Str & First
Ave), I'm not about to brave NY City traffic on my bike. Seen too many
near misses and a few not misses, which generally do not favor the bicycle
rider
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Brian Henderson <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007 10:55:17 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Of course, that's why we bicycle or walk rather than use the car,
>>whenever we can.
>
> Which doesn't help when you go shopping, does it? You can't carry
> groceries for a family on your bicycle, much less trying to carry a
> dozen 4x8 sheets of plywood on your back. This is the woodworking
> newsgroup after all. :)
>
Since beer is appropriate for this newsgroup <grin>, I'll mention we
carried a 12 pack on the bike. It is resting now before we use the car and
take it (them) to a birthday party tomorrow.
(while originally Dutch, I'm not a beer connoisseur.)
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
On Sun, 27 May 2007 10:55:17 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>Of course, that's why we bicycle or walk rather than use the car, whenever
>we can.
Which doesn't help when you go shopping, does it? You can't carry
groceries for a family on your bicycle, much less trying to carry a
dozen 4x8 sheets of plywood on your back. This is the woodworking
newsgroup after all. :)
Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
> I travel to Canada almost every month, trust me, I've noticed. Just
> wish I'd bought $10K in Canadian years ago... The Euro is at an all-time
> high, the British pound is at a 26 year high, on and on
>
( I've seen threads go off topic/track - but this one's headed off
in some interesting directions - economics, public policy, trans-
-portation and land use policy. So let's head off onto foreign
policy.)
Ah - the Half Full view. The other way of seeing it is that the
US dollar is declining significantly, as is how much of the rest
of the world's opinion of the US in terms of our foreign policy.
We, the United States, are a relatively young country and are
still learning how to deal with problems. At the moment, we
happen to be being led by a child, and a not very bright one
at that. Not the best situation to be in when crisis arise
(see 911/Afgahnistan/Iraq/Iran/Katrina/Enron/Abrimoff/...)
and more on the horizon (global warming/impending energy
crisis/culture clash/social security/medical costs/...). We
will get over it in time. Please bear with us a bit longer.
Sorry about the inconvenience we're causing - we're working
on getting back on track.
charlie b
EXT wrote:
| What most Americans don't know is that the US currency is in the
| toilet. I run a Canadian company which has 99% of its income in US
| dollars. Our revenue is up but when converted to Canadian dollars
| it becomes less than years before. I used to get $1.60 Canadian for
| every one US dollar, now I only get $1.08 per US dollar and the
| experts say that the two currencies will be par by year end.
Actually, most Americans /do/ know it. If you look at it from the
outside, then the dollar is in the tank - and when you look at it from
the inside, then the cost of everything bought with dollars is
skyrocketing. Either way, it's the same inflation.
What most Americans don't seem to recognize is that it's all happening
in a completely predictable "cause and effect" sequence, and that the
current level of inflation is merely a gentle introduction...
| This means that whatever you bought a couple of years ago that was
| imported, now it is going to cost you almost 50% more today because
| the other currencies in the world have not dropped as much as the
| US dollar.
It's not just imported goods - the cost of doing business in the US is
being affected and the cost of domestic goods is on the same track as
imported goods. It's just a little further back on the train because a
lot of American businesses are dragging their feet on raising prices.
There's not much good anywhere in the picture. As the US dollar drops
relative to other currencies, Americans will necessarily cut back on
their purchases of imported goods - leaving exporters with excessive
inventory, excessive capacity, and excessive employment. Worse, or at
least as bad, obligations payable in US dollars will be paid in
devalued currency (which you're already experiencing).
| Home Depot, Wal-Mart and many others compensate by buying even
| cheaper crap so that the price doesn't go up, that is why the
| plywood is now pure junk.
That can only be carried so far. At some point the merchandise becomes
so crappy that no one wants to buy it, the prices are forced up anyway
to the point where the merchandise becomes unaffordable, and the
commercial structure needs to be rebuilt.
About then some damn political cowboy will come along and tell us:
"Hey! War is _good_ for business."
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
HeyBub wrote:
| Doug Miller wrote:
|| In article <[email protected]>, "HeyBub"
|| <[email protected]> wrote:
||| Morris Dovey wrote:
|||| Actually, most Americans /do/ know it. If you look at it from the
|||| outside, then the dollar is in the tank - and when you look at it
|||| from the inside, then the cost of everything bought with dollars
|||| is skyrocketing. Either way, it's the same inflation.
|||
||| Uh, no. The current inflation rate of about 34% compares favorably
||| with the
|| ^^^
|| Isn't there supposed to be a decimal point in there somewhere?
|
| Yeah. My bad. 3.4%.
You missed the point (I wasn't comparing inflation rates, rather
perspectives of people inside the US vs people outside the US)
I'm not interested in arguing with your statistics - what I'm
experiencing is nothing like 3.4% - but that may only reflect a
difference between the way the number is produced and my real world
spending.
[ The majority of my spending is for clear hardwood, plywood, glue,
solar glazing, stock aluminum extrusions, stainless steel screws,
carbide cutting tools, OTR shipping, and the usual gasoline,
electricity, phone/dsl, natural gas, rent, and groceries. ]
I wish /I/ were seeing your 3.4% - and (probably) so do my customers.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
"Upscale" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "EXT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> What most Americans don't know is that the US currency is in the toilet.
>> I
>> run a Canadian company which has 99% of its income in US dollars. Our
>> revenue is up but when converted to Canadian dollars it becomes less than
>> years before. I used to get $1.60 Canadian for every one US dollar, now I
>> only get $1.08 per US dollar and the experts say that the two currencies
>> will be par by year end.
>
> Funny how our great Canadian dollar is worth so much, yet our mayor David
> Miller of Toronto, Canada's largest city is crying how Toronto is broke.
> He
> is and will be taxing everything in sight including stuff like putting
> a10%
> tax on all purchased beer and alcohol.
>
> American currency may or may not be in the toilet, but what good is a
> strong
> Canadian dollar when our government literally taxes us into the poor
> house,
> effectively taking away any advantage to the ordinary citizen?
>
A strong Canadian dollar is not good for the economy. They are saying it has
cost 250,000 jobs to date, with another 250,000 jobs if it goes par. The
city of Toronto has many problems with trying to favour many groups and not
doing any of it well. Hotels are not earning much profit with the scarcity
of tourists, so they are not paying so much on business tax. The city is way
undertaxed compared to the 905 area. I see every day people who used to
complain that their property taxes doubled during re-evaluation, so now they
are paying $2000.00 in property taxes instead of $1000.00, where houses in
the suburbs are paying $4000.00 for houses with the same evaluation. The
differences are still apparent.
Enough said, this is a thread about rising costs for wood products while
quality is going down in the US, not about Toronto's mismanagement of money.
Lew Hodgett wrote:
| Dave Balderstone wrote:
|
| > I'm not suggesting they'd give up. I'm suggesting they'd be
| forced into > bankruptcy.
|
| Not all will survive, that's life; however, most can, and $10/gal
| gasoline is on the horizon, but it won't happen over night.
|
| There is time, but we can't waste it.
|
| Time to start addressing the problem, IMHO.
Hmmm. "Addressing the problem" - does that mean 'talking it to death'
or does it mean 'develop a plan and take action'?
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Robatoy wrote:
| On May 27, 10:39 pm, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote:
|
|| or does it mean 'develop a plan and take action'?
||
| But FIRST we do a feasibility study to see if the desired path
| warrants a steering committee in order to fund a research group in
| order to see if we can synchronise all the lobbies and focus groups
| to make discoveries to establish re-electabilty. After they write a
| proposal to investigate the ramifications due to financial and
| environmental impact of any and all proposals...when we get that all
| ironed out, it's time to move on to the next big step: we drum up
| support by printing leaflets which we will hand out at all the White
| Castle outlets. THEN we develop a plan. As long as it doesn't impact
| the Slippy-Bellied Snail population and/or the spotted owls. Oh..
| and we need to hire some lawyers.
|
| Is that what you mean, Morris?
|
| o¿o
|
| (tongue firmly planted in cheek)
Tongue in cheek or not, there's enough truth in that to be downright
discouraging.
'develop a plan and take action' ::= 'talk it to death'
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Lew Hodgett wrote:
| Morris Dovey wrote:
|
|| Hmmm. "Addressing the problem" - does that mean 'talking it to
|| death' or does it mean 'develop a plan and take action'?
|
| Good question, why do you ask?
Ever the optimist, I keep hoping that "addressing the problem" will
mean more than just endlessly (re)specifying the problem.
Robatoy summarized the solution process fairly well and reminded me
that it's not that we lack practical solutions, it's that we lack the
will to implement.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Lew Hodgett wrote:
| Morris Dovey wrote:
|
|| Robatoy summarized the solution process fairly well and reminded me
|| that it's not that we lack practical solutions, it's that we lack
|| the will to implement.
|
| Nobody wants to see their ox gored.
|
| As soon as people can see personal gain, it will happen.
That doesn't bode well. Consider the lessons of Katrina...
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
todd wrote:
| "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
| news:[email protected]...
|| Lew Hodgett wrote:
||| Morris Dovey wrote:
|||
|||| Robatoy summarized the solution process fairly well and reminded
|||| me that it's not that we lack practical solutions, it's that we
|||| lack the will to implement.
|||
||| Nobody wants to see their ox gored.
|||
||| As soon as people can see personal gain, it will happen.
||
|| That doesn't bode well. Consider the lessons of Katrina...
|
| Would that be the "don't build a large city below sea level" lesson
| or another one?
All of them. New Orleans did not, of course, begin as a large city
when the French established a trading outpost near the mouth of the
Mississippi. I'm ignorant of the period in which New Orleans acquired
"large city" status.
Let's begin with that point in time when we first knew for certain
that the levees were inadequate to perform the function for which
they'd been constructed, and work our way forward from there. Perhaps
we will learn enough to do better when, for example, the "Big One"
hits the Los Angeles area.
Let's enumerate the lessons (and there are /so/ many) without
consideration of the political entities involved. The lessons to be
learned won't be made any more clear by allowing their examination to
devolve into finger pointing.
There are a lot of lessons (at least hundreds!) to be learned, and one
of them is that when major interests are in conflict, /someone's/ ox
is going to be gored, and wanting or not wanting that to happen is not
necessarily going to affect what happens to the ox.
Another is that as long as we see life as a zero sum game, relying on
stakeholders to prevent ox-gorings is only wishful thinking. Some
stakeholders delight in seeing others' oxes gored.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Lew Hodgett wrote:
| Morris Dovey wrote:
|
|| That doesn't bode well. Consider the lessons of Katrina...
|
| I'm not sure how that relates.
|
| The natural disaster of Katrina, turned the light of reality on
| blatant racism as well as complete government indifference and
| incompetence at all levels, especially federal; however, none of
| that relates to alternate energy pursuits, IMHO.
Many people are delaying action in order to maximize a hoped-for
government payment (either an entitlement or a tax incentive), much as
many people lived in New Orleans staking their futures on hoped-for
government maintenance of the levee system.
The lesson: It would appear to be a mistake to make important
decisions based on expected behavior of government - regardless of
whether those expectations involve public safety or energy policy.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Just Wondering wrote:
| charlieb wrote:
||
|| We, the United States, are a relatively young country and are
|| still learning how to deal with problems. At the moment, we
|| happen to be being led by a child, and a not very bright one
|| at that.
|
| The President has relatively little influence on the national
| economy. Congress, Big Business, Bis Labor, and the Federal Reserve
| all have more to do with it.
As reflected in the decision to not open the Iraqi reconstruction to a
normal bidding process?
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
HeyBub wrote:
| Remember, the feds can't do much of anything unless asked by local
| functionaries. It's sad that the feds were hamstrung by the stunning
| incompetence of the local folk. For example, there were enough
| school busses to take a goodly portion of the people in the dome
| all the way to Houston (one "stolen" bus made the trip).
Lesson: Do not depend on competence of government.
Be prepared.
I'm an amateur radio operator. It's not just an interesting hobby -
there are associated responsibilities: provide communications in
emergency situations; provide communications equipment, on demand, to
the federal government; cease operations instantly when radio silence
is ordered, etc.
I inquired as to the need for communications volunteers in NO and was
told to stay away - that volunteers would just get in the way. I've
heard that other people volunteered to take boats, food, and just
about everything else you can imagine - and that they were told the
same thing.
Lesson: If volunteers are needed, just go. The command and control
crap can all be sorted out when the immediate needs have
been met. When lives are at stake, it's not about "who's in
charge."
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Brian Henderson wrote:
> There really is no way to have effective mass transit in Southern
> California without tearing down the entire state and starting over.
> It just wasn't designed that way. Most of the currently existing mass
> transit we have runs nearly empty because it just doesn't fulfill the
> needs of the majority of potential users.
Seems there may be a change underway.
Trying to use the mass transit system to get someplace in a hurry, is
a lost cause at present; however, every time I ride the light rail, it
is full, especially the Long Beach run.
Other "commuter" runs are showing an increase in ridership.
Personally, would like to see $10/gal gasoline.
Suddenly, there would be a whole new way of looking at things.
Lew
On 28 May 2007 06:34:16 -0700, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>On May 28, 1:26 am, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ever the optimist, I keep hoping that "addressing the problem" will
>> mean more than just endlessly (re)specifying the problem.
>>
>> Robatoy summarized the solution process fairly well and reminded me
>> that it's not that we lack practical solutions, it's that we lack the
>> will to implement.
>>
>In my quest to find a place to work and grow into, an option to buy a
>strip-mall with light industrial zoning resulted in having a few
>meetings with a few 'doers'. The place was simply too big for just
... snip
cue ominous background music ...
>I noticed a little tag dangling from one of the valves which
>instructed me to get in touch with an agency regarding the
>'decommissioning' of installed equipment.
>
crescendo
>The meetings that ensued could have been straight from a horror
>movie.... a psychological thriller. Marquis deSade with an MBA and
>sandals and some training in extortion.
>He spent an hour with his Powerpoint presentation
That's outlawed by the Geneva conventions, we can't do it to terrorists,
but it's OK to subject regular taxpayers to.
>nuts...he was there to make sure that wasn't going to happen. Almost a
>year later, that building is still sitting there... and farktard is
>wringing his hands looking for somebody who wants to play his game.
... but the thing is, *he* doesn't care. It's not his building, he has
no stake in it. It is the owners trying to get someone into those digs who
are the real losers.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"HerHusband" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Mike,
>
> > THD has a 30 day satisfaction return policy on just about everything.
> > You'd be surprised at what they will allow to be returned.
>
> I guess I figured wood was one of those "non-returnable" items. Like
buying
> anything electrical at an autoparts store. Especially after I have cut it.
As we all would - based on what makes common sense. I found it quite
surprising when I discovered that one could buy something like piece of
plywood, and return it once we cut it up, but you sure can.
>
> > I have a problem with all of the posts here about lumber that guys go
> > out and buy (... and select from the pile themselves), and then post
> > complaints about the inferior quality of such things as should have
> > been obvious when they were buying it.
>
> In my case, it's not like I have many options. Home Depot or Lowes are
> about it for cabinet plywood. There used to be a hardwood supplier in
town,
> but they closed down a few years ago. Some of the lumber yards "might"
have
> cabinet ply, but it's not typically out where you can see it. You usually
> have to pay first, and hope there's something good when you drive back to
> pick it up.
>
> So, I guess I figured plywood is plywood, and would be about the same
> everywhere. Like I said, live and learn...
>
> > Plys are easy to see, right on the rack. Fills are easy to see.
> > Shame on you for not taking the time to look it over better
>
> In all fairness, I "did" examine the sheets in the store. I dug through
> several sheets to find the best three in the stack. But even the "best"
had
> problems. I also didn't notice any real voids in the ply's on the edge.
> Maybe one or two small ones, but I had no idea the whole sheet was filled
> with them.
>
> As for the thin veneer, it's not visible to the naked eye. What I
> "thought" was the veneer layer on each side was actually just another core
> ply. Even after cutting and intensely examining a small piece, I can't see
> the veneer layer. It's that thin...
>
> I also had no way of knowing the wood would splinter so badly when
> crosscut, until I cut into it.
Hey Anthony - I might have been harsher than I should have been in my reply
to your post. I'm sorry for that. It's just that we see posts like yours
almost weekly here, and at a point you begin to think that no-one should be
surprised by what they get in a piece of plywood at THD at this point.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On Sat, 26 May 2007 00:09:47 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of course, gasoline here in the US is still
>very cheap compared to Europe - about Euro 1.42 per liter in Wageningen,
>Netherlands. If I calculate correctly, that comes to ~US$7.30 per gallon,
>or more than twice the price in North Jersey.
Don't most european countries subsidize mass transit (railroads) with
gas taxes? I remember hearing this in Switzerland, but was under
the impression many European countries do the same.
Actually, not a bad idea, at least for the northeast, southeast,
Chicagoland, and So Cal. US.
On Mon, 28 May 2007 12:23:27 GMT, "CW" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Every time someone starts this "walk or ride a bike" thing, I think, live in
>Seattle for a year and see how practicle that is.
Heh, good point. I had a friend who lived just outside of Portland
for a while and sometimes, even having a car wasn't a good idea, you
needed a boat. :)
"Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> In my quest to find a place to work and grow into, an option to buy a
> strip-mall with light industrial zoning resulted in having a few
> meetings with a few 'doers'. The place was simply too big for just
> lill' ol' me and I wanted to offset my financial commitments.
Where was this "almost to be" working environment? Would be bureaucrats
aside, it would brighten my day at even the possibility of something like
that within travelling distance from where I live.
> year later, that building is still sitting there... and farktard is
> wringing his hands looking for somebody who wants to play his game.
<[email protected]> wrote in message
> You know, as a sidebar to this, Home Depot sold quality plywood a few
> years ago. (5?- 7?) It was the same stuff I got at my hardwoods guy,
> even the same stamps sometimes. It was just a about 20% less.
You're right ... last time I got good Oak 3/4" ply from HD was around 2002.
IIRC, it was around $42/sheet, which was a pretty good price at the time,
void free, relatively thick veneer compared to the higher wood boutique
prices, and much heavier than what they sell as plywood at any BORG today.
I just got a quote from my hardwood dealer yesterday for 3/4"x4x8 A1 rift
sawn red oak - $115.95/sheet; up $11/sheet since I bought the last load just
about one year ago.
Inflation? ... what inflation?
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 2/20/07
KarlC@ (the obvious)
On Sat, 26 May 2007 18:37:38 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
...
> IMHO, things that will reduce petroleum production are good
...
I'll buy that -- IF you replace "production" with "demand"
Tom Veatch wrote in news:[email protected]:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 18:37:38 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
>> IMHO, things that will reduce petroleum production are good
> ...
>
> I'll buy that -- IF you replace "production" with "demand"
>
Of course, that's why we bicycle or walk rather than use the car, whenever
we can.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Funny - I usually have better luck with Home Depot for plywood then I do
with Lowes.
When I want decent plywood I go to my local hardwoods store and spend a lot
of time just loooking before picking.
Lowes and Home Depot are not the places to buy your quality plywood -- good
sources for shop stuff but not what I would put in my family room.
Later and best of luck.
Thom
"HerHusband" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent somewhere...
> :)
>
> I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets of
> 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home
> Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
>
> I didn't notice it till I got home and unloaded, but the faces of the
> sheet had numerous blemishes and patches (both sides). I should have
> looked it over better at the store, BEFORE I started cutting. :)
> Thankfully, I managed to cut around the major blemishes, or hide them in
> places where they can't be seen. Unfortunately, this left me a little
> short, so now I need to pick up a quarter sheet to build the last two
> shelves.
>
> The plywood is also riddled with numerous voids. I don't think I have
> made a cut yet that hasn't had pieces of the core falling out.
>
> Even the grain pattern of the sheets is less than attractive. I'm not
> sure what kind of birch trees they got the wood from, but this stuff is
> ugly! :)
>
> Perhaps worst of all, the surface veneers are extremely thin and fragile.
> It appears to be thinner than a sheet of paper. I bought brand new saw
> blades for making this project, and the chipout is absolutely horrible. I
> also sanded a couple of pieces yesterday, and can sand through the veneer
> in less than 20 seconds with 100 grit paper. Now my project is almost
> finished, and I'm almost scared to sand it for fear of sanding through
> the veneer and exposing the core.
>
> Worst of all, I paid $40 a sheet for this stuff at Home Depot, and then
> saw MUCH better quality lumber at Lowes (where I normally get my plywood)
> for only $30 a sheet.
>
> The plywood sucks, but a lot of the fault obviously lies with me. I made
> the mistake of shopping on a weekend, when the rest of the DIY crowd was
> crowding into the store. I thought the convenience of having my wife and
> daughter there to help load the cart would be nice. But, in my attempt to
> get in and out of the store, I didn't inspect the sheets closely enough.
>
> Anyway, I'm almost finished with my entertainment center and am happy
> with the way it is turning out. Despite the poor quality lumber, I have
> managed to hide the worst blemishes. If I can pull off sanding the
> project next week without destroying it, there's still a chance it might
> turn out OK.
>
> Live and learn...
>
> Anthony
Say What? wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>> I buy solid wood and hardwoodplywoods at www.creativewoodworksusa.com
>> Birch is only $1.95 per foot and plywoods are around $35.They will
>> ship and it isn't as expensive as I thought it would be for shipping.
>>
>
> Your "testimonial" might have more credibility had you told us you were
> the same Mike Williams who OWNS Creative Woodworks and that rather than
> buying solid and plywood FROM them you buy it FOR the business and sell it.
>
At least now I know a place NOT to buy from :-).
--
It's turtles, all the way down
Don't be too smug until you've sawed it. I bought about 20 sheets of
1/2" ---haha, 7/16" from Menards and at least half the sheets had SEVERE
delamination INSIDE where you couldn't see it without sawing!!!
Their A7 (or is it A9?) siding wasn't any better.
When I complained, they said "that's the way it is", but did give me
part of the money back. Of course that doesn't make up for the 50 mile
round trips and the extra labor. I thought they'd at least tell me
that they'd get back to the mfr and see that it didn't happen again.
Pete Stanaitis
----------------------------------------------------
Dave wrote:
> "HerHusband" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent somewhere...
>>:)
>>
>>I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets of
>>3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home
>>Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
>>
>>I didn't notice it till I got home and unloaded, but the faces of the
>>sheet had numerous blemishes and patches (both sides). I should have
>>looked it over better at the store, BEFORE I started cutting. :)
>>Thankfully, I managed to cut around the major blemishes, or hide them in
>>places where they can't be seen. Unfortunately, this left me a little
>>short, so now I need to pick up a quarter sheet to build the last two
>>shelves.
>>
>>The plywood is also riddled with numerous voids. I don't think I have
>>made a cut yet that hasn't had pieces of the core falling out.
>>
>
>
> Thanks for posting. Now I know where not to buy plywood. I bought some from
> Menards. I had to go through the stack before I found 4 acceptable sheets.
>
>
>
>>Even the grain pattern of the sheets is less than attractive. I'm not
>>sure what kind of birch trees they got the wood from, but this stuff is
>>ugly! :)
>>
>>Perhaps worst of all, the surface veneers are extremely thin and fragile.
>>It appears to be thinner than a sheet of paper. I bought brand new saw
>>blades for making this project, and the chipout is absolutely horrible. I
>>also sanded a couple of pieces yesterday, and can sand through the veneer
>>in less than 20 seconds with 100 grit paper. Now my project is almost
>>finished, and I'm almost scared to sand it for fear of sanding through
>>the veneer and exposing the core.
>>
>>Worst of all, I paid $40 a sheet for this stuff at Home Depot, and then
>>saw MUCH better quality lumber at Lowes (where I normally get my plywood)
>>for only $30 a sheet.
>>
>>The plywood sucks, but a lot of the fault obviously lies with me. I made
>>the mistake of shopping on a weekend, when the rest of the DIY crowd was
>>crowding into the store. I thought the convenience of having my wife and
>>daughter there to help load the cart would be nice. But, in my attempt to
>>get in and out of the store, I didn't inspect the sheets closely enough.
>>
>>Anyway, I'm almost finished with my entertainment center and am happy
>>with the way it is turning out. Despite the poor quality lumber, I have
>>managed to hide the worst blemishes. If I can pull off sanding the
>>project next week without destroying it, there's still a chance it might
>>turn out OK.
>>
>>Live and learn...
>>
>>Anthony
>
>
>
"Lew Hodgett" wrote in message
> Other "commuter" runs are showing an increase in ridership.
Here in Houston we are burdened with these extra long, foul smelling, smoke
spewing, articulated buses that'll hold around 100, half full.
In 20 years I don't think I've ever seen one with more than 6 passengers,
including the driver.
Then again, it's a matter of priorities around here.
Neither Metro, nor the Houston Independent School District are in the
business of transportation or education, as you expect, but instead, in the
real estate business ... along with the overriding business of insuring that
their employee and management benefits far exceed what the taxpayer, who
pays for same, can afford for his/her family.
First things, first, after all.
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 2/20/07
KarlC@ (the obvious)
Swingman wrote:
>
> Tell me about it ... even the trades are putting "fuel cost" clauses in
> their bids the past two months.
"SurCharge" riders are nothing new.
Here in SoCal, been getting fuel surcharges on resin and glass
deliveries the last 3-4 years. Usually $10/delivery.
Still remember when the Hunt brothers tried to corner the silver market.
Almost everything I sold that had silver contacts, carried a silver
surcharge until things settled out.
Of course, back in the days of rampant inflation, "Price in effect at
time of shipment" was popular.
There was no such thing as a quote good for 30 days.
Lew
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On May 25, 12:10 pm, Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
< big snip >
Does anyone with knowledge know the current status of the China plywood
flap? The last I heard was that the US was going to file a complaint
against China for selling the plywood that is marked as meeting standards
that it obviously doesn't meet.
Dave Balderstone wrote:
> In some places. Here in Canada, it would have a nasty economic impact
> because of the huge distances we have to move goods, both imported and
> for export. It would kill western Canadian farmers.
You know, I doubt that.
What you are suggesting is that the way of life of the Canadian grain
farmer would be put in peril, and they would just give up and quit farming.
When the human animal's survival is attacked, they can be very
resourceful and adaptable.
My money would be on the farmers.
Lew
On May 28, 5:39 pm, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
> "todd" <[email protected]> wrote innews:[email protected]:
>
>
>
> > "Han" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> Brian Henderson <[email protected]> wrote in
> >>news:[email protected]:
>
> >>> On Mon, 28 May 2007 03:25:44 -0500, "todd" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>Would that be the "don't build a large city below sea level" lesson
> >>>>or another one?
>
> >>> And the morons want to build it BELOW SEA LEVEL AGAIN!!!!!
>
> >>> Some people never learn.
>
> >> Well, half or so of the Netherlands is below sea level. Yes it gives
> >> problems, but that's why they have engineers. Most of the time it
> >> works very well. Sometimes it doesn't (January 1953 was bad), and a
> >> new "plan" is instituted. Somewhere there is a lesson or two in that
> >> experience for New Orleans.
>
> >> Best regards
> >> Han
>
> > Well, when half the country is at or below sea level, you don't have
> > much choice. I submit that we do have a choice as to what parts of
> > NOLA to rebuild.
>
> > todd
>
> The biggest choice of the "Deltaplan" was to substitute dikes (levees)
> with increased height around each island in the Dutch Delta with an
> almost single dike "in front of" most of the islands. Later it was
> decided to make a movable barrier rather than an immovable one in front
> of one of the main inlets, and thus keep the Oosterschelde more or less
> tidal, without the need to increase dike heights along its whole
> shoreline.
>
> Very similar things can be done for the Mississippi delta (I'm a
> biochemist, so I do know what I am talking about <grin>).
>
> --
> Best regards
> Han
> email address is invalid
The Dutch are a whacky bunch, niet?
"Han" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Brian Henderson <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
>> On Mon, 28 May 2007 03:25:44 -0500, "todd" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Would that be the "don't build a large city below sea level" lesson or
>>>another one?
>>
>> And the morons want to build it BELOW SEA LEVEL AGAIN!!!!!
>>
>> Some people never learn.
>>
> Well, half or so of the Netherlands is below sea level. Yes it gives
> problems, but that's why they have engineers. Most of the time it works
> very well. Sometimes it doesn't (January 1953 was bad), and a new "plan"
> is instituted. Somewhere there is a lesson or two in that experience for
> New Orleans.
>
> Best regards
> Han
Well, when half the country is at or below sea level, you don't have much
choice. I submit that we do have a choice as to what parts of NOLA to
rebuild.
todd
Brian Henderson <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Mon, 28 May 2007 03:25:44 -0500, "todd" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Would that be the "don't build a large city below sea level" lesson or
>>another one?
>
> And the morons want to build it BELOW SEA LEVEL AGAIN!!!!!
>
> Some people never learn.
>
Well, half or so of the Netherlands is below sea level. Yes it gives
problems, but that's why they have engineers. Most of the time it works
very well. Sometimes it doesn't (January 1953 was bad), and a new "plan"
is instituted. Somewhere there is a lesson or two in that experience for
New Orleans.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
"todd" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> "Han" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Brian Henderson <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> On Mon, 28 May 2007 03:25:44 -0500, "todd" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Would that be the "don't build a large city below sea level" lesson
>>>>or another one?
>>>
>>> And the morons want to build it BELOW SEA LEVEL AGAIN!!!!!
>>>
>>> Some people never learn.
>>>
>> Well, half or so of the Netherlands is below sea level. Yes it gives
>> problems, but that's why they have engineers. Most of the time it
>> works very well. Sometimes it doesn't (January 1953 was bad), and a
>> new "plan" is instituted. Somewhere there is a lesson or two in that
>> experience for New Orleans.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Han
>
> Well, when half the country is at or below sea level, you don't have
> much choice. I submit that we do have a choice as to what parts of
> NOLA to rebuild.
>
> todd
>
The biggest choice of the "Deltaplan" was to substitute dikes (levees)
with increased height around each island in the Dutch Delta with an
almost single dike "in front of" most of the islands. Later it was
decided to make a movable barrier rather than an immovable one in front
of one of the main inlets, and thus keep the Oosterschelde more or less
tidal, without the need to increase dike heights along its whole
shoreline.
Very similar things can be done for the Mississippi delta (I'm a
biochemist, so I do know what I am talking about <grin>).
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote in news:1180388902.863225.256740
@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
> The Dutch are a whacky bunch, niet?
>
Nahh, it's just me <grin>!
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
On Mon, 28 May 2007 03:25:44 -0500, "todd" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Would that be the "don't build a large city below sea level" lesson or
>another one?
And the morons want to build it BELOW SEA LEVEL AGAIN!!!!!
Some people never learn.
[email protected] wrote:
> On May 25, 1:49 pm, HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> All the more reason to use solid wood instead of plywood.
>> It's hard to beat the cost and stability of plywood, and solid wood has
>> it's own share of issues. Warping, cupping, splitting, etc. I did buy a lot
>> of solid wood for trim, drawer fronts, etc. and it's not picture perfect
>> either.
>>
>> Of course, then there's the issue of gluing up panels and the labor (and
>> goofs) involved with that.
>>
>> Anthony
>
> I buy solid wood and hardwoodplywoods at www.creativewoodworksusa.com
> Birch is only $1.95 per foot and plywoods are around $35.They will
> ship and it isn't as expensive as I thought it would be for shipping.
>
Your "testimonial" might have more credibility had you told us you were
the same Mike Williams who OWNS Creative Woodworks and that rather than
buying solid and plywood FROM them you buy it FOR the business and sell it.
Your posts aren't exactly truthful now, are they? They are, IMNSHO,
rather tacky.
BTW, fire your web designer (or hire one), for a commercial
establishment such as yours the site sucks!
Dave Balderstone wrote:
> As an aside, I work for the largest agricultural newspaper in Canada. I
> understand the resilience of the farmer, but I also understand the
> market and financial pressures they're under here in the prairies.
>
> I'm not suggesting they'd give up. I'm suggesting they'd be forced into
> bankruptcy.
Not all will survive, that's life; however, most can, and $10/gal
gasoline is on the horizon, but it won't happen over night.
There is time, but we can't waste it.
Time to start addressing the problem, IMHO.
As the cartoonist Walt Kelly voiced thru his Pogo comic strip, "We have
met the enemy, and it is us."
Lew
Lew Hodgett wrote:
| Fortunately, none of that has anything to do with the necessity of
| saving human life in an emergency, a job which unfortunately fell to
| FEMA, which had been systematically stripped of it's resources
| since 2000.
Before that, even. During the floods of '93 I spent several days as
the volunteer operator of the FEMA communications center in the Hoover
Federal Building in Des Moines. It was a particularly easy job since
there was zero traffic in and zero traffic out.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
"Mark & Juanita" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>>
>
> Oh puhleeze! The fact is that money was provided to the city of NOLA in
> years past. Rampant corruption funneled a significant amount of that
> money
> away from the levee projects that were to be reinforced.
>
> This had nothing to do with race, this had to do with people who were
> expecting the government to solve all of their problems and local
> politicians who couldn't find their @#$ with both hands and a map.
You are dead on.
On Mon, 28 May 2007 23:09:35 GMT, Lew Hodgett
<[email protected]> wrote:
>The systematic dismantling of gov't seems to be their only objective and
>they are doing a pretty good job of it.
IF ONLY someone were doing a good job of dismantling the U.S.'
leviathan federal government back to within its Constitutional
boundaries.
--
Chuck Taylor
http://home.hiwaay.net/~taylorc/contact/
On Mon, 28 May 2007 23:42:18 +0100, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, 28 May 2007 20:13:05 GMT, Brian Henderson
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 28 May 2007 03:25:44 -0500, "todd" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Would that be the "don't build a large city below sea level" lesson or
>>>another one?
>>
>>And the morons want to build it BELOW SEA LEVEL AGAIN!!!!!
>>
>>Some people never learn.
>
>New Orleans is manageable with the right funding and engineering
>knowledge, being heavily populated by blacks doesn't help secure the
>right funding though, if it were somewhere "paler" then you could
>guarantee the money would be provided.
>
Oh puhleeze! The fact is that money was provided to the city of NOLA in
years past. Rampant corruption funneled a significant amount of that money
away from the levee projects that were to be reinforced.
This had nothing to do with race, this had to do with people who were
expecting the government to solve all of their problems and local
politicians who couldn't find their @#$ with both hands and a map.
Even MSNBC piles on:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9342186/
http://katrinacoverage.com/tag/corruption/page/4/
http://katrinacoverage.com/2005/09/08/levee-corruption-flashback-to-nov-29-2004.html
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008860
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Mon, 28 May 2007 23:42:18 +0100, Mike <[email protected]>
wrote:
>But just wait until the huge landslip occurs at Cumbre Vieja on La
>Palma in the Canary Islands. Above sea level or not the entire
>eastern seaboard will be under water much deeper (as in about half a
>MILE deeper) than New Orleans ever was.
Them mega-tsunamis are fun, huh? But at least they don't happen every
year like hurricane season.
Somebody wrote:
> Oh puhleeze! The fact is that money was provided to the city of
NOLA in
> years past. Rampant corruption funneled a significant amount of that
> money
> away from the levee projects that were to be reinforced.
<snip>
Since long before Huey Long, Louisiana has been known for great food,
great music, and rampant corruption.
Fortunately, none of that has anything to do with the necessity of
saving human life in an emergency, a job which unfortunately fell to
FEMA, which had been systematically stripped of it's resources since 2000.
Lew
On Mon, 28 May 2007 18:26:23 -0700, Mark & Juanita
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh puhleeze! The fact is that money was provided to the city of NOLA in
>years past. Rampant corruption funneled a significant amount of that money
>away from the levee projects that were to be reinforced.
Exactly, but it's easier to point fingers and claim racism than to
deal with the fact that they were given the money to fix the levees
time and time again and they squandered it.
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>> Let's begin with that point in time when we first knew for certain
> that the levees were inadequate to perform the function for which
> they'd been constructed, and work our way forward from there. Perhaps
> we will learn enough to do better when, for example, the "Big One"
> hits the Los Angeles area.
>
> Let's enumerate the lessons (and there are /so/ many) without
> consideration of the political entities involved. The lessons to be
> learned won't be made any more clear by allowing their examination to
> devolve into finger pointing.
Of course it was politics and people that got them there. Engineers told
'em over and over what fools they were. Not that N.O. is unique, of
course. Most of the Yellow river and a couple of others in China are
"elevated" too.
What we need is a good dictator to get the public transportation running on
time and get those people out of the way of the river (and the woods, and
the owls and the wolves...) so the greater good is served. Where's Joe when
we need 'im?
HerHusband wrote:
> There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent
somewhere...
> :)
>
> I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three
sheets of
> 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my
local Home
> Depot.
<snip>
Two (2) mistakes:
1) Walking thru the doors of Home Depot.
2) Thinking they even know what Birch cabinet plywood is, much less
sell it.
Plywood distributors exist for a reason.
Lew
On May 29, 1:14=EF=BF=BDam, Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Han wrote:
>
> > =A0> Have you driven through Connecticut lately?
>
> To perhaps give you a different perspective on the difference between
> East coast and SoCal transit, consider the following:
>
> Since you live in Fairlawn, NJ, a question.
>
> How long would it take you to travel between Fairlawn and New Haven, CT
> to say attend classes at Yale?
>
> For many in SoCal, that would be a fairly typical length of commute.
>
> Lew
Yeah, Lew, but you wouldn't do it. Go to Rutgers or Princeton instead,
or even NYU or Columbia. COmmuting that distance in the east is
nuts...there are simply too many alternatives.
I used to commute from Amawalk, NY (northern Westchester County) to
Manhattan when I worked in a downtown ad agency--William St. That
didn't last too long. It blew something close to five hours a day, and
at 23, I had other uses for that five hours. I simply moved into
Manhattan (admittedly, probably not a solution today, especially if
you're making a munificent $85 a week). Single room, with bath but no
cooking facilities, $13 a week.
Lew Hodgett wrote:
> IMHO, SUBSIDIZED public transit is one of those things the gov't
> should be doing.
>
> The benefits of this type infrastructure are almost to enormous to
> calculate.
Public transit is subsidized.....locally each bus ride costs the taxpayer
approx. $25.00 but the ticket is about a buck......across the Columbia river
in Portland Max (light rail) costs about $40.00 per ride.......with a ticket
price of around $2.00. Other than having zero riders at actual cost how
does one justify such a subsidy? Rod
Rod & Betty Jo wrote:
>
> Public transit is subsidized.....locally each bus ride costs the
taxpayer
> approx. $25.00 but the ticket is about a buck......across the
Columbia river
> in Portland Max (light rail) costs about $40.00 per ride.......with a
ticket
> price of around $2.00. Other than having zero riders at actual cost how
> does one justify such a subsidy? Rod
As someone once said to me, taxes are the price we pay to live in an
organized society.
Simply for the sake of discussion, consider the following:
A locality spends $25,000,000/year to operate a public transit system
that cost $10,000,000,000 to build.
During the year, only one person took one ride on that system.
You could make the argument that the cost of that ride was $10,000,000;
however, there is a benefit to the local community of just having a
transit system, regardless of it's usefulness that reduces the cost of
that $10,000,000 ride.
How much? Who knows?
What is the value of having a convention in your town, or securing a
business that brings new jobs, etc, etc, because the local transit
system was available?
Who knows, but there are think tanks out there that can answer those
questions.
The point is that good infrastructure investments usually provide great
rewards over long periods of time that are best measured directly.
The last major bricks and mortar infrastructure project in the US was
probably the interstate highway system that is now over 50 years old.
Eisenhower wanted a highway system built to quickly deliver military
goods across the country.
The result was the interstate highway system.
Guess the military got some benefit; however, with out the interstate
system, where would we be today?
Did the US make a good infrastructure investment?
You tell me.
Lew
ride cost the
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> todd wrote:
>
> | I live near
> | Chicago, and the regional commuter railway system is pretty good,
> | as long as you're going to/from the city.
>
> Do you remember when it was possible to travel from any point in
> Chicago to any other and to/from the suburbs by rail?
No. When was that? I'll admit that you can get from many suburbs to
another via Metra, you just have to go through Chicago first to do it.
> Do you remember being able to travel from Chicago to any other city by
> rail in comfort? I remember traveling from Chicago to NYC in a clean,
> well-furnished private room.
Well, you can do that now with Amtrak. But it's a) extremely expensive and
b) slow.
> | The east and to a lesser
> | extent the west coast are good places to have passenger rail.
>
> Ok...
>
> | Other than that, there isn't much point right now to have it
> | anywhere else besides a few places.
>
> What "few places" are you talking about?
Houston and Dallas come to mind. Two population centers of several million
people within relatively close proximity. Unlike Europe and Japan, that
covers a very small part of the US.
> And what "many places" are you excluding?
Most of the rest of the US. Say, between Topeka, KS and Idaho Falls, ID.
> I think I might want to disagree with you, but I'm not quite clear on
> what you're saying ;-)
Perhaps answering this question will help. Does the Chicago-area Metra have
a line to Rockford?
todd
"Han" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote in news:1UD6i.20077$3P3.11685
> @newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:
>
>> Eisenhower wanted a highway system built to quickly deliver military
>> goods across the country.
>>
>> The result was the interstate highway system.
>>
>> Guess the military got some benefit; however, with out the interstate
>> system, where would we be today?
>>
>> Did the US make a good infrastructure investment?
>>
>> You tell me.
>>
> I can't tell you - it's a question of opinion. An improved railway system
> would have been a possible good alternative or addition.
Enough with the railway system talk. Railways make great sense in densely
populated areas. Eurpoe and Japan come to mind. If we had Europe's
population density, we'd have over a billion people in the US. Christ, if
we had Japan's density, we'd have over 3 billion people. When we reach a
billion people or so, I imagine an interstate rail system will make a lot
more sense. I live near Chicago, and the regional commuter railway system
is pretty good, as long as you're going to/from the city. The east and to a
lesser extent the west coast are good places to have passenger rail. Other
than that, there isn't much point right now to have it anywhere else besides
a few places.
todd
Charlie Self wrote:
>
> Yeah, Lew, but you wouldn't do it. Go to Rutgers or Princeton instead,
> or even NYU or Columbia. COmmuting that distance in the east is
> nuts...there are simply too many alternatives.
I had almost forgotten that part of east coast culture.
"Commute" is a word in a foreign language they do not understand.
Of course with the east coat highway system, it is understandable.
30 years ago, The Garden State looked like a page straight out of the
Monopoly game. If it were ever to come up to current standards, a
complete rebuild would be necessary.
Still remember a trip up the NJ Pike AKA: Parking lot.
Sunday night, 5:00PM, just another weekend, hit the NJ Pike from the
PA Pike and come to a complete stop.
3-4 hours of stop & go later, the Holland Tunnel.
Definitely not a winner.
Lew
todd wrote:
| I live near
| Chicago, and the regional commuter railway system is pretty good,
| as long as you're going to/from the city.
Do you remember when it was possible to travel from any point in
Chicago to any other and to/from the suburbs by rail?
Do you remember being able to travel from Chicago to any other city by
rail in comfort? I remember traveling from Chicago to NYC in a clean,
well-furnished private room.
| The east and to a lesser
| extent the west coast are good places to have passenger rail.
Ok...
| Other than that, there isn't much point right now to have it
| anywhere else besides a few places.
What "few places" are you talking about?
And what "many places" are you excluding?
I think I might want to disagree with you, but I'm not quite clear on
what you're saying ;-)
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
todd wrote:
| "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
| news:[email protected]...
|| todd wrote:
||
||| I live near
||| Chicago, and the regional commuter railway system is pretty good,
||| as long as you're going to/from the city.
||
|| Do you remember when it was possible to travel from any point in
|| Chicago to any other and to/from the suburbs by rail?
|
| No. When was that? I'll admit that you can get from many suburbs
| to another via Metra, you just have to go through Chicago first to
| do it.
It has been a while. I remember taking the South Shore into the city
from northern Indiana, then using the L and streetcars to get around
the city and surrounding 'burbs. It was easier and faster than my much
later trips through bumper-to-bumper traffic on the Dan Ryan. My
decision to leave the area was significantly affected by that
twice-daily ordeal.
|| Do you remember being able to travel from Chicago to any other
|| city by rail in comfort? I remember traveling from Chicago to NYC
|| in a clean, well-furnished private room.
|
| Well, you can do that now with Amtrak. But it's a) extremely
| expensive and b) slow.
It took full day the last such trip I made. It was cheaper than
flying, and provided an opportunity to unwind, relax, catch up on some
correspondence, and to arrive refreshed.
||| The east and to a lesser
||| extent the west coast are good places to have passenger rail.
||
|| Ok...
||
||| Other than that, there isn't much point right now to have it
||| anywhere else besides a few places.
||
|| What "few places" are you talking about?
|
| Houston and Dallas come to mind. Two population centers of several
| million people within relatively close proximity. Unlike Europe
| and Japan, that covers a very small part of the US.
|
|| And what "many places" are you excluding?
|
| Most of the rest of the US. Say, between Topeka, KS and Idaho
| Falls, ID.
|
|| I think I might want to disagree with you, but I'm not quite clear
|| on what you're saying ;-)
Now I don't think I do - we were each thinking of a different type of
service. I /would/ like to see more complete long-distance service (a
la Amtrak), but my primary interest is in local commuter service from
which even relatively small cities like Des Moines could benefit.
| Perhaps answering this question will help. Does the Chicago-area
| Metra have a line to Rockford?
Darned if I know - I haven't needed to get around in Chicago for a
long time.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
| "Han" <[email protected]> wrote in message
|||
|| An improved railway system
|| would have been a possible good alternative or addition.
|
| We had one. What happend to it?
Sad story involving unfathomable amounts of greed and stupidity on the
part of more participants than just railroads, unions, and
government...
[1] Railroad management squeezed their employees a bit too much
[2] Railroad employees unionized to protect themselves
[3] Unions squeezed railroads a bit too much
[4] Government stepped in to regulate the daylights out of all
[5] Railroads stopped being profitable
[6] Expensive passenger service dropped
[7] Costly-to-maintain freight routes dropped
[8] Freight business migrates to trucking
[9] Freight business falls below critical mass
[10] Entire railroad companies expire
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
todd wrote:
| Maybe it's been a long time since you made that trip. It's
| currently a 20-hour train ride from Chicago to NY. If you have a
| "roomette", it runs $482 one way. I have family in San Antonio, TX.
| I've looked into taking the train with my wife and our 2 little
| ones. It would take 32+ hours and cost about $1600 round trip with
| the "family bedroom". I can fly for about half that. I wouldn't
| mind the time so much, but I can't pay double just for the pleasure.
It has been quite a while. I don't remember what the fare was - but am
reasonably certain it was a _lot_ less than $482 :-)
Coincidentally, my last domestic train trip was to Killeen, Texas from
Fayetteville, North Carolina. Definitely a different level of comfort
on a troop train - but it'd be difficult to beat the fare...
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> todd wrote:
> | "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> | news:[email protected]...
> || todd wrote:
> ||
> ||| I live near
> ||| Chicago, and the regional commuter railway system is pretty good,
> ||| as long as you're going to/from the city.
> ||
> || Do you remember when it was possible to travel from any point in
> || Chicago to any other and to/from the suburbs by rail?
> |
> | No. When was that? I'll admit that you can get from many suburbs
> | to another via Metra, you just have to go through Chicago first to
> | do it.
>
> It has been a while. I remember taking the South Shore into the city
> from northern Indiana, then using the L and streetcars to get around
> the city and surrounding 'burbs. It was easier and faster than my much
> later trips through bumper-to-bumper traffic on the Dan Ryan. My
> decision to leave the area was significantly affected by that
> twice-daily ordeal.
>
> || Do you remember being able to travel from Chicago to any other
> || city by rail in comfort? I remember traveling from Chicago to NYC
> || in a clean, well-furnished private room.
> |
> | Well, you can do that now with Amtrak. But it's a) extremely
> | expensive and b) slow.
>
> It took full day the last such trip I made. It was cheaper than
> flying, and provided an opportunity to unwind, relax, catch up on some
> correspondence, and to arrive refreshed.
Maybe it's been a long time since you made that trip. It's currently a
20-hour train ride from Chicago to NY. If you have a "roomette", it runs
$482 one way. I have family in San Antonio, TX. I've looked into taking the
train with my wife and our 2 little ones. It would take 32+ hours and cost
about $1600 round trip with the "family bedroom". I can fly for about half
that. I wouldn't mind the time so much, but I can't pay double just for the
pleasure.
todd
> Han wrote:
>
> > Have you driven through Connecticut lately?
To perhaps give you a different perspective on the difference between
East coast and SoCal transit, consider the following:
Since you live in Fairlawn, NJ, a question.
How long would it take you to travel between Fairlawn and New Haven, CT
to say attend classes at Yale?
For many in SoCal, that would be a fairly typical length of commute.
Lew
Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote in news:Yao6i.19682$3P3.1535
@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:
> Brian Henderson wrote:
>
>
> >
> > While I have no need to ever use public transit, especially since
> > everything I ever need is local, it's really irrelevant. However, I
> > can think of two examples where it might have been useful and was
> > completely worthless.
> <snip>
>
> As someone once said, "There are no problems, only varying degrees of
> challenging opportunities".
>
> It is the opportunities that need to be exploited.
>
> Lew
>
I can walk to the train station in Fair Lawn, NJ (5 min or so), take the
train (with a transfer) into Penn Station NY, then take Amtrak to Boston
South station. Then it is a single ride on the T to Porter Square, walking
distance to my son's place (6 min). The car would be faster if there is
not much traffic, but there is no guarantee that will happen. It is more
expensive by train, certainly for 2 people, but it is much more relaxing by
train. Have you driven through Connecticut lately?
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote in news:1UD6i.20077$3P3.11685
@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:
> Eisenhower wanted a highway system built to quickly deliver military
> goods across the country.
>
> The result was the interstate highway system.
>
> Guess the military got some benefit; however, with out the interstate
> system, where would we be today?
>
> Did the US make a good infrastructure investment?
>
> You tell me.
>
I can't tell you - it's a question of opinion. An improved railway system
would have been a possible good alternative or addition.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote in news:XEO6i.16122$j63.4423
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:
>
>> Han wrote:
>>
>> > Have you driven through Connecticut lately?
>
> To perhaps give you a different perspective on the difference between
> East coast and SoCal transit, consider the following:
>
> Since you live in Fairlawn, NJ, a question.
>
> How long would it take you to travel between Fairlawn and New Haven, CT
> to say attend classes at Yale?
>
> For many in SoCal, that would be a fairly typical length of commute.
>
> Lew
>
That would be 1 1/2 to 2 hrs each way. Of course there might be classes at
Cornell Medical School, Columbia university, New York University or a dozen
other universities which would be acceptable for me and closer by.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Brian Henderson wrote:
>
> While I have no need to ever use public transit, especially since
> everything I ever need is local, it's really irrelevant. However, I
> can think of two examples where it might have been useful and was
> completely worthless.
<snip>
As someone once said, "There are no problems, only varying degrees of
challenging opportunities".
It is the opportunities that need to be exploited.
Lew
Han wrote:
> Have you driven through Connecticut lately?
Trying to compare SoCal transportation requirements with those of the
North East corridor of the US is a little like comparing oranges and apples.
SoCal basically consists of basically 6 counties, one of which, San
Bernardino, is larger than the entire state of Connecticut.
The population of SoCal is approaching 18 million, which makes it larger
than 24 of the 50 US states.
People here drive 100+ miles each way from home to job, every day, for
many reasons including either the lack of time it takes or lack of
availability of public transportation.
IMHO, SUBSIDIZED public transit is one of those things the gov't should
be doing.
The benefits of this type infrastructure are almost to enormous to
calculate.
On Sat, 26 May 2007 18:22:56 GMT, Lew Hodgett
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Trying to use the mass transit system to get someplace in a hurry, is
>a lost cause at present; however, every time I ride the light rail, it
>is full, especially the Long Beach run.
While I have no need to ever use public transit, especially since
everything I ever need is local, it's really irrelevant. However, I
can think of two examples where it might have been useful and was
completely worthless.
Last year, we were going down to San Diego and looked into taking the
train down. It was much, much more expensive to take the train than
it was to drive and the only way to even get to a train that was going
that way was to drive 60 miles down into Orange County, leave our car
somewhere I wouldn't park if my life depended on it and hope nobody
vandalized it. Then I would have had to pay for bus or taxi service
in San Diego the whole weekend since ht train station is nowhere near
where we were going and it would have cost 2-3x as much as driving in
the end. Is this supposed to be reliable, useful public
transportation?
Secondly, my best friend was teaching at Cal State Fullerton. He
would have taken the Metrorail to work but they stop running at 6pm,
long before he'd be heading home. The only way to take the train
would have left him stranded every night with no way to get home. It
is faster, cheaper and more convenient to drive.
>Suddenly, there would be a whole new way of looking at things.
No, it still wouldn't make public transit any more convenient or even
possible for anyone. It would just make things more expensive.
"todd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>>> Guess the military got some benefit; however, with out the interstate
>>> system, where would we be today?
>>>
>>> Did the US make a good infrastructure investment?
>>>
>>> You tell me.
>>>
>> I can't tell you - it's a question of opinion. An improved railway
>> system
>> would have been a possible good alternative or addition.
>
> Enough with the railway system talk. Railways make great sense in densely
> populated areas. Eurpoe and Japan come to mind. If we had Europe's
> population density, we'd have over a billion people in the US. Christ, if
> we had Japan's density, we'd have over 3 billion people. When we reach a
> billion people or so, I imagine an interstate rail system will make a lot
> more sense. I live near Chicago, and the regional commuter railway system
> is pretty good, as long as you're going to/from the city. The east and to
> a lesser extent the west coast are good places to have passenger rail.
> Other than that, there isn't much point right now to have it anywhere else
> besides a few places.
Problem was that the railroads were privately owned. We weren't so keen on
capitalizing them, because the same sort of talk about corporate welfare and
being in the pocket of big corporations would have begun ad nauseam. They
were occupied trying to get the firemen off the diesels at the time.
Without eminent domain the highways would be impossible, much less railroad
rights of way. Though we can take for purposes of economic development now,
right? Then there's the demand to get them all off of street level anyway so
that motorists who can't wait or like to challenge trains won't get hurt.
Think of the liability insurance, the toxic spills, the horror....
I remember the Chicago, South Shore and South Bend as quite a ride. Still
there?
"Han" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
> An improved railway system
> would have been a possible good alternative or addition.
We had one. What happend to it?
HeyBub wrote:
> I don't see how you can accuse the federal government of incompetence.
Let me spell it out for you: BUSH
He has proven to be unqualified as well as arrogant, and has surrounded
himself with like kind.
The systematic dismantling of gov't seems to be their only objective and
they are doing a pretty good job of it.
The wealthy get wealthier, the poor get poorer, and the middle class
gets screwed.
Ain't life grand?
Lew
Morris Dovey wrote:
> That doesn't bode well. Consider the lessons of Katrina...
I'm not sure how that relates.
The natural disaster of Katrina, turned the light of reality on blatant
racism as well as complete government indifference and incompetence at
all levels, especially federal; however, none of that relates to
alternate energy pursuits, IMHO.
Lew
[email protected] wrote:
> I fear that if I go to my hardwood supplier though, his $60 a sheet
> birch won't be that much better.
That rather depends upon the grade he is selling. Each face of
plywood is graded just as are other wood materials and you get what
you pay for. All plywood face veneers are skimpy now, have been for a
long time. The days of 1/24 are long gone, welcome 1/42 and skinnier.
Another consideration is how the face veneer has been cut...most
economical method and therefore the most common (nearly universay at
DIY stores) is rotary. Generally unatractive. There are also flat
cut and quartered, book or slip matched in either.
--
dadiOH
____________________________
dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
...a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Tell me about it ... even the trades are putting "fuel cost" clauses in
> their bids the past two months.
I started noticing fuel Surcharges when fuel prices hit the $1.50 mark 45 or
so years ago. USP and Orkin started adding it to the bills.
charlieb wrote:
>
> We, the United States, are a relatively young country and are
> still learning how to deal with problems. At the moment, we
> happen to be being led by a child, and a not very bright one
> at that.
The President has relatively little influence on the national economy.
Congress, Big Business, Bis Labor, and the Federal Reserve all have more
to do with it.
In article <[email protected]>, "HeyBub" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Morris Dovey wrote:
>> Actually, most Americans /do/ know it. If you look at it from the
>> outside, then the dollar is in the tank - and when you look at it from
>> the inside, then the cost of everything bought with dollars is
>> skyrocketing. Either way, it's the same inflation.
>
>Uh, no. The current inflation rate of about 34% compares favorably with the
^^^
Isn't there supposed to be a decimal point in there somewhere?
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.
If you can't think of ways around that, you're not thinking very hard.
"Rod & Betty Jo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> How so? You do know the individual limit on campaign contribution is just
a
> thousand or two, corporations can't officially buy their way in....
Leon,
>> I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets
>> of 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my
>> local Home Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have
>> ever purchased!
> Learning to look at what you are buying is a good practice.
Yeah, I usually inspect the lumber I buy with much greater detail, but I
guess I was busy looking at my lady and talking with her instead. :)
> BUT when the plywood becomes delaminated or pieces start falling out I
> Take It Back. Sure it is cut but the piece is defective, how would
> you know if you had not cut it?
Good point, but it's all hindsight now. Assuming I don't destroy the
project when I start sanding, it will all work out in the end.
Anthony
> All the more reason to use solid wood instead of plywood.
It's hard to beat the cost and stability of plywood, and solid wood has
it's own share of issues. Warping, cupping, splitting, etc. I did buy a lot
of solid wood for trim, drawer fronts, etc. and it's not picture perfect
either.
Of course, then there's the issue of gluing up panels and the labor (and
goofs) involved with that.
Anthony
> I have never seen face veneer that thin.
> I don't think you could spray it on any thinner.
Yep, sounds like the same stuff! :)
> You really need to be extra careful when sanding.
> I sanded right through that stuff
That's the part I'm worried about. It shouldn't take much sanding on the
large flat areas, it's near the edges where the trim meets the plywood that
I'm most concerned. That and anywhere I need to fill a nail hole or
something.
> Luckily, the face of the pieces weren't all that interesting,
> so with some finish on the top it didn't matter.
The majority of my entertainment center will usually have "stuff" on it,
the top is higher than most people will see, and most of the front is solid
wood. So, maybe there's hope... :)
> I used to buy the "China ply" at HD and it was a decent product.
I've purchased birch ply at HD and Lowes for years and never had a problem.
I guess that's why I didn't give it much thought when I bought it. Now I
know better.
> the pink glue they used to press the plies
> together stunk like something was burning.
Interesting, I noticed that smell when I was making some cuts, but didn't
see any signs of burning on the wood.
Anthony
Robert,
> Nothing burned, it just smelled like it. That was the confusing
> part. I am sure the Chinaply is bound by something made from boiled
> animals and food remnants.
Because of the blemishes in my full sheets, I had to run down and pick up
another 1/4 sheet of 3/4" plywood today. I didn't want to spring for a
full sheet, and Lowes was out of the precut panels, so it was back to Home
Depot.
I was a lot more careful this time, making sure there were no blemishes on
either surface, and confidently carried my panel up and paid for it.
Unfortunately, when I got home I realized the grain didn't quite look
right. Now granted, I'm not all that familiar with wood species, but this
looks more like oak than birch. I double-checked the label, it says birch,
but it sure doesn't look like the usual stuff.
Of course, once again, I didn't catch on until I had cut the panel down to
the size of my shelves. Geez, I can't win... I got so busy looking at the
"quality" of the wood, I completely forgot to even check if it was the
right "type" of wood. Maybe I should just go sit down for a while. :)
Anyway, when I was cutting this panel, it smelled like... Well.... Urine.
Kind of disgusting actually.
Anthony
Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote in news:f6K5i.13582$Ut6.11928
@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:
> EXT wrote:
> > What most Americans don't know is that the US currency is in the
> toilet. I
> > run a Canadian company which has 99% of its income in US dollars.
> <snip>
>
> Didn't realize the Canadian situation; however, I can tell you that
> the USD is also in the tank vs the Euro.
>
> Spending money you don't have, to finance a war, will do that.
>
> Lew
Euro used to cost approximately $0.85 (at its low point). Now it costs
$1.35 or so. That means that with respect to the euro, the dollar has lost
close to 70% of its value. Of course, gasoline here in the US is still
very cheap compared to Europe - about Euro 1.42 per liter in Wageningen,
Netherlands. If I calculate correctly, that comes to ~US$7.30 per gallon,
or more than twice the price in North Jersey.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
On May 29, 8:29=EF=BF=BDam, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote:
> todd wrote:
>
> | Maybe it's been a long time since you made that trip. =A0It's
> | currently a 20-hour train ride from Chicago to NY. =A0If you have a
> | "roomette", it runs $482 one way. I have family in San Antonio, TX.
> | I've looked into taking the train with my wife and our 2 little
> | ones. =A0It would take 32+ hours and cost about $1600 round trip with
> | the "family bedroom". =A0I can fly for about half that. =A0I wouldn't
> | mind the time so much, but I can't pay double just for the pleasure.
>
> It has been quite a while. I don't remember what the fare was - but am
> reasonably certain it was a _lot_ less than $482 :-)
>
> Coincidentally, my last domestic train trip was to Killeen, Texas from
> Fayetteville, North Carolina. Definitely a different level of comfort
> on a troop train - but it'd be difficult to beat the fare...
>
> --
> Morris Dovey
> DeSoto Solar
> DeSoto, Iowa USAhttp://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
I dunno, Morris. With what the USMC paid me, the time lost was a big
cost. IMS, I got $78 a month when I got to Parris Island. Long time
ago, but it didn't go far even then.
One of my uncles bitched that he made about that as a tech sgt. in the
S=2E Pacific during WWII. True? I dunno. He wasn't much of a BS artist.
On May 29, 5:31=EF=BF=BDam, "Rod & Betty Jo" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lew Hodgett wrote:
> > HeyBub wrote:
>
> >> I don't see how you can accuse the federal government of
> >> incompetence.
>
> > Let me spell it out for you: BUSH
>
> > He has proven to be unqualified as well as arrogant, and has
> > surrounded himself with like kind.
>
> > The systematic dismantling of gov't seems to be their only objective
> > and they are doing a pretty good job of it.
>
> > The wealthy get wealthier, the poor get poorer, and the middle class
> > gets screwed.
>
> > Ain't life grand?
>
> > Lew
>
> And yet in your rant in spite of Bush's grave incompetence you failed to
> provide a single fact.......Reality a bit hard for you? =A0Rod- Hide quot=
ed text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Actually, he probably figured everyone read the dialy newspapers.
"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Actually, he probably figured everyone read the dialy newspapers.
Yeah, no Bias there.
B A R R Y <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007 11:16:08 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I'm not about to brave NY City traffic on my bike. Seen too many
>>near misses and a few not misses, which generally do not favor the
>>bicycle rider
>
> I hear that!
>
> The only time I ride NYC is during the 5 Boro Bike Tour, on closed
> roads.
>
> One year, I took MNCRR in from New Haven, had a beautiful ride from
> GCT to Battery Park at 6 AM, a great day of touring, and a HELL RIDE
> back to GCT ~ 3 PM. And that was on a Sunday! Now, if I take the
> train in with the bike, I'll use the subway to get to Battery Park.
>
> We usually use the subway to get around when visiting, but one of
> these days I need to learn the bus system. The bus would be so much
> faster when I have to change trains or do the marathon walk in Times
> Square Station. I like the newer trains with the electric station
> maps, working A/C, and automated announcements.
>
> NYC has a such an excellent mass transit system, I'd also leave the
> bike home during commuting hours.
>
Never got my act together to do any part of the bike tour <sad>.
Bus maps are free at Grand Central somewhere, most likely at a subway
ticket booth.
Sometimes, the problem with buses is the choked up traffic, and a subway
ride is faster then, depending on a lot.
For those unfamiliar with the NY City system, everything is Metrocard
nowadays (or cash in coins on the bus, where you can get a free transfer
if you ask).
A single fare is good on the whole subway system plus a busride, or on 2
separate busrides. A transfer is implied when you validate the
metrocard, and is good for departure on the next trip within 2 hours of
starting the first. Metrocard validation only occurs when entering bus
or subway.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
On Sun, 27 May 2007 11:16:08 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>I'm not about to brave NY City traffic on my bike. Seen too many
>near misses and a few not misses, which generally do not favor the bicycle
>rider
I hear that!
The only time I ride NYC is during the 5 Boro Bike Tour, on closed
roads.
One year, I took MNCRR in from New Haven, had a beautiful ride from
GCT to Battery Park at 6 AM, a great day of touring, and a HELL RIDE
back to GCT ~ 3 PM. And that was on a Sunday! Now, if I take the
train in with the bike, I'll use the subway to get to Battery Park.
We usually use the subway to get around when visiting, but one of
these days I need to learn the bus system. The bus would be so much
faster when I have to change trains or do the marathon walk in Times
Square Station. I like the newer trains with the electric station
maps, working A/C, and automated announcements.
NYC has a such an excellent mass transit system, I'd also leave the
bike home during commuting hours.
On Sun, 27 May 2007 21:39:48 -0500, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Hmmm. "Addressing the problem" - does that mean 'talking it to death'
>or does it mean 'develop a plan and take action'?
Usually it means "bitch and whine about it, but in the end, ultimately
accomplish nothing".
B A R R Y <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 00:09:47 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Of course, gasoline here in the US is still
>>very cheap compared to Europe - about Euro 1.42 per liter in
>>Wageningen, Netherlands. If I calculate correctly, that comes to
>>~US$7.30 per gallon, or more than twice the price in North Jersey.
>
> Don't most european countries subsidize mass transit (railroads) with
> gas taxes? I remember hearing this in Switzerland, but was under
> the impression many European countries do the same.
>
> Actually, not a bad idea, at least for the northeast, southeast,
> Chicagoland, and So Cal. US.
>
A simple 1 hour train ride during rush hour in the Netherlands (Ede-Wag to
Amsterdam Central) costs euro 11.80 (~US$ 15.93).
On NJTransit, during rush hour, Allendale to NY Penn (also about 1 hr)
costs $8.00.
Who is subsidizing more?
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
B A R R Y <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 01:14:14 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>A simple 1 hour train ride during rush hour in the Netherlands
>>(Ede-Wag to Amsterdam Central) costs euro 11.80 (~US$ 15.93).
>>
>>On NJTransit, during rush hour, Allendale to NY Penn (also about 1 hr)
>> costs $8.00.
>>
>>Who is subsidizing more?
>
> In that rare case, probably the Americans, but simple ticket price
> dosen't provide enough information.
That's the easy way to compare for me at this time. I have found
similarly several or more years ago. Rail service in the Netherlands has
declined in general, first with decreasing investments and maintenance by
the state owned company, then gotten worse with privatization. Maybe
I'll have better reports after my next trip.
> On the other side of NY, a one way, rush hour ride on Metro North,
> from Bridgeport, CT to Grand Central Terminal, which is also about an
> hour, is $15.50 US.
When I lived just outside Queens in Floral Park, LI, prices and travel
times were similar to what one now pays from Fair Lawn, NJ. Notable
differences are in the treatment of passengers by rail road staff, much
better in NJ (at least on the Bergen line).
> The New York metro area has good commuter rail service.
And choices between different rail road lines, and buses.
> As a whole, our longer distance rail system is a joke to
> what I have experienced in Europe.
Only real long distance was NY to Seattle. What an experience! Speed
and absence of priority over freight was sort of a bummer, but the
ability to take a shower on the train was very good!
I also like the Acela (and the "regional") between NY, Boston, and DC.
It takes only a little longer than the torture via airports and the mini
seats in planes, butn then I can walk to the local train here and walk to
my son's place in Somerville, from the T.
European high speed trains are indeed comfortable and relatively fast.
Brussels - Paris is really great on the Thalys. I also traveled Florence
to Netherlands once, but that is really now better by cheap air,
especially when time becomes a factor.
> I was lead to believe that high road fuel taxes help pay for the
> high-quality European railroads. Is that not the case?
>
European fuel taxes go to the general funds, generally speaking, they
aren't dedicated AFAIK. The European experience is also if you build it,
they will come, or traffic will fill the roads no matter how much is
built and widened. Traffic jams should (IMHO) be encouraged so that more
will be spent on (subsidized) public transportation, which is also more
energy efficient.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Mike,
> THD has a 30 day satisfaction return policy on just about everything.
> You'd be surprised at what they will allow to be returned.
I guess I figured wood was one of those "non-returnable" items. Like buying
anything electrical at an autoparts store. Especially after I have cut it.
> I have a problem with all of the posts here about lumber that guys go
> out and buy (... and select from the pile themselves), and then post
> complaints about the inferior quality of such things as should have
> been obvious when they were buying it.
In my case, it's not like I have many options. Home Depot or Lowes are
about it for cabinet plywood. There used to be a hardwood supplier in town,
but they closed down a few years ago. Some of the lumber yards "might" have
cabinet ply, but it's not typically out where you can see it. You usually
have to pay first, and hope there's something good when you drive back to
pick it up.
So, I guess I figured plywood is plywood, and would be about the same
everywhere. Like I said, live and learn...
> Plys are easy to see, right on the rack. Fills are easy to see.
> Shame on you for not taking the time to look it over better
In all fairness, I "did" examine the sheets in the store. I dug through
several sheets to find the best three in the stack. But even the "best" had
problems. I also didn't notice any real voids in the ply's on the edge.
Maybe one or two small ones, but I had no idea the whole sheet was filled
with them.
As for the thin veneer, it's not visible to the naked eye. What I
"thought" was the veneer layer on each side was actually just another core
ply. Even after cutting and intensely examining a small piece, I can't see
the veneer layer. It's that thin...
I also had no way of knowing the wood would splinter so badly when
crosscut, until I cut into it.
Anthony
Dave Balderstone <dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote in
news:260520071229215267%dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Brian Henderson wrote:
>>
>> > There really is no way to have effective mass transit in Southern
>> > California without tearing down the entire state and starting
>> > over. It just wasn't designed that way. Most of the currently
>> > existing mass transit we have runs nearly empty because it just
>> > doesn't fulfill the needs of the majority of potential users.
>>
>> Seems there may be a change underway.
>>
>> Trying to use the mass transit system to get someplace in a hurry, is
>> a lost cause at present; however, every time I ride the light rail,
>> it is full, especially the Long Beach run.
>>
>> Other "commuter" runs are showing an increase in ridership.
>>
>> Personally, would like to see $10/gal gasoline.
>>
>> Suddenly, there would be a whole new way of looking at things.
>
> In some places. Here in Canada, it would have a nasty economic impact
> because of the huge distances we have to move goods, both imported and
> for export. It would kill western Canadian farmers.
>
Don't know whether it would. It might kill a bit of the road and auto
industry, but people will need food. Currently (at least here in North
Jersey) there is a growing "need" for people to feel good and shop for
groceries/veggies/whatever that is grown "nearby". That would impact
faraway growers as well, be they West Canadians or Australians. IMHO,
things that will reduce petroleum production are good, for very many
reasons.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> Here in Houston we are burdened with these extra long, foul smelling,
> smoke spewing, articulated buses that'll hold around 100, half full.
>
> In 20 years I don't think I've ever seen one with more than 6
> passengers, including the driver.
>
> Then again, it's a matter of priorities around here.
>
In NY City, those buses are NOT foul smelling or smoke spewing (anymore).
They are very efficient, since now a single driver can and does haul at
least 50% more people. One side effect has been that many bus stops now
take up most of a short block on the avenues.
Economically, I can take a bus from 23rd & 1st to 68 & 1st, then a subway
from 68 & Lex to Penn station on a single fare ($2 or less). Those crazy
routes happen when I need to drop something off uptown before going home.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
> I might have been harsher than I should have been
> in my reply to your post. I'm sorry for that.
No problem, I realize I'm part of the overall problem. Haste makes waste,
afterall... :)
But I appreciate your apology. These days it seems like newsgroups in
general have turned into an F-U mentality, so it's refreshing to see a
little common courtesy. Thanks!
Take care,
Anthony
Rod,
> If I recall your local to me (Vancouver area).
> have you ever tried Shurway(on St. Johns rd)?
I'm out in the Camas area, so they're not exactly "local", but the last
time I went to Shurway (over in Portland about 15-20 years ago) they were
mostly a salvage operation. I didn't realize they were carrying new stuff
now. Thanks for the recommendation.
Anthony
> just bought three sheets of 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet
> of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home Depot.
> This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
> the surface veneers are extremely thin
> the chipout is absolutely horrible.
> can sand through the veneer in less than 20 seconds
I finished sanding and staining my entertainment center yesterday, and I'm
happy to report it all worked out OK in the end. I managed to not sand
through the thin veneer in any place critical (I did expose the veneer in
one small spot on the back, but thankfully it won't normally be seen.).
The chipout that is still exposed (mostly on the ends of the shelves) is
barely visible once sanded and stained.
Thankfully, whatever the core ply's are made of, it seems to stain the same
color as the surface veneer. Both the chipouts and the exposed veneer on
the back almost disappear when the stain is applied. That was a huge
relief.
> The plywood is also riddled with numerous voids.
Since all of the plywood edges are covered or hidden, this turned out to be
not much of an issue.
> looks more like oak than birch. I double-checked the label, it says birch
I still think the 1/4 panel I bought is probably oak, but it seemed to
stain up the same color as the rest of the project. So unless someone goes
up and compares the grain pattern on the shelves, I don't think anyone will
ever know. If it bugs me too much, it would be easy to make a couple of new
shelves, but once the shelves have "stuff" on them, I doubt I'll even
notice what the grain is like.
So, today I'm going to start applying the finish coats of polyurethane.
That will probably take a few days to complete. I'll try to post some
pictures in the binaries newsgroup when I'm finished.
Take care,
Anthony
"HerHusband" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Perhaps worst of all, the surface veneers are extremely thin and fragile.
> It appears to be thinner than a sheet of paper. I bought brand new saw
> blades for making this project, and the chipout is absolutely horrible. I
> also sanded a couple of pieces yesterday, and can sand through the veneer
> in less than 20 seconds with 100 grit paper. Now my project is almost
> finished, and I'm almost scared to sand it for fear of sanding through
> the veneer and exposing the core.
>
> Worst of all, I paid $40 a sheet for this stuff at Home Depot, and then
> saw MUCH better quality lumber at Lowes (where I normally get my plywood)
> for only $30 a sheet.
>
THD has a 30 day satisfaction return policy on just about everything. You'd
be surprised at what they will allow to be returned. You should have
returned the plywood when you noticed it was so substandard. They will also
price match, plus a 10% kicker on any competitor's like product.
I have a problem with all of the posts here about lumber that guys go out
and buy (... and select from the pile themselves), and then post complaints
about the inferior quality of such things as should have been obvious when
they were buying it. Plys are easy to see, right on the rack. Fills are
easy to see. Shame on you for not taking the time to look it over better,
but why post a vent about how crummy the product is when you are the one who
selected it?
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On Sat, 26 May 2007 01:14:14 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>A simple 1 hour train ride during rush hour in the Netherlands (Ede-Wag to
>Amsterdam Central) costs euro 11.80 (~US$ 15.93).
>
>On NJTransit, during rush hour, Allendale to NY Penn (also about 1 hr)
>costs $8.00.
>
>Who is subsidizing more?
In that rare case, probably the Americans, but simple ticket price
dosen't provide enough information.
On the other side of NY, a one way, rush hour ride on Metro North,
from Bridgeport, CT to Grand Central Terminal, which is also about an
hour, is $15.50 US. The New York metro area has good commuter rail
service. As a whole, our longer distance rail system is a joke to
what I have experienced in Europe.
I was lead to believe that high road fuel taxes help pay for the
high-quality European railroads. Is that not the case?
"EXT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> What most Americans don't know is that the US currency is in the toilet. I
> run a Canadian company which has 99% of its income in US dollars. Our
> revenue is up but when converted to Canadian dollars it becomes less than
> years before. I used to get $1.60 Canadian for every one US dollar, now I
> only get $1.08 per US dollar and the experts say that the two currencies
> will be par by year end.
Funny how our great Canadian dollar is worth so much, yet our mayor David
Miller of Toronto, Canada's largest city is crying how Toronto is broke. He
is and will be taxing everything in sight including stuff like putting a10%
tax on all purchased beer and alcohol.
American currency may or may not be in the toilet, but what good is a strong
Canadian dollar when our government literally taxes us into the poor house,
effectively taking away any advantage to the ordinary citizen?
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> Personally, would like to see $10/gal gasoline.
>
> Suddenly, there would be a whole new way of looking at things.
Certainly would change how we look at things. Now the government screws us,
with the extra revenue fro $10 gas, they can royally screw us. FREE MONEY,
grab all you can.
You're not thinking very hard.
"Rod & Betty Jo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> CW wrote:
> > If you can't think of ways around that, you're not thinking very hard.
>
> I covered that under "speech, book and Presidential libraries" nonetheless
> the $100-200 million or whatever directly raised for a presidential
election
> is from "small" contributors.....without this support it is not going to
> happen .... not to mention that most "big business" contribute to both
> parties to hedge their bets. Rod
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
"HerHusband" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent somewhere...
> :)
>
> I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets of
> 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home
> Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
>
> I didn't notice it till I got home and unloaded, but the faces of the
> sheet had numerous blemishes and patches (both sides). I should have
> looked it over better at the store, BEFORE I started cutting. :)
> Thankfully, I managed to cut around the major blemishes, or hide them in
> places where they can't be seen. Unfortunately, this left me a little
> short, so now I need to pick up a quarter sheet to build the last two
> shelves.
>
> The plywood is also riddled with numerous voids. I don't think I have
> made a cut yet that hasn't had pieces of the core falling out.
>
> Even the grain pattern of the sheets is less than attractive. I'm not
> sure what kind of birch trees they got the wood from, but this stuff is
> ugly! :)
>
> Perhaps worst of all, the surface veneers are extremely thin and fragile.
> It appears to be thinner than a sheet of paper. I bought brand new saw
> blades for making this project, and the chipout is absolutely horrible. I
> also sanded a couple of pieces yesterday, and can sand through the veneer
> in less than 20 seconds with 100 grit paper. Now my project is almost
> finished, and I'm almost scared to sand it for fear of sanding through
> the veneer and exposing the core.
>
> Worst of all, I paid $40 a sheet for this stuff at Home Depot, and then
> saw MUCH better quality lumber at Lowes (where I normally get my plywood)
> for only $30 a sheet.
>
> The plywood sucks, but a lot of the fault obviously lies with me. I made
> the mistake of shopping on a weekend, when the rest of the DIY crowd was
> crowding into the store. I thought the convenience of having my wife and
> daughter there to help load the cart would be nice. But, in my attempt to
> get in and out of the store, I didn't inspect the sheets closely enough.
>
> Anyway, I'm almost finished with my entertainment center and am happy
> with the way it is turning out. Despite the poor quality lumber, I have
> managed to hide the worst blemishes. If I can pull off sanding the
> project next week without destroying it, there's still a chance it might
> turn out OK.
>
> Live and learn...
>
> Anthony
All the more reason to use solid wood instead of plywood.
"EXT" <[email protected]> writes:
>This means that whatever you bought a couple of years ago that was imported,
>now it is going to cost you almost 50% more today because the other
>currencies in the world have not dropped as much as the US dollar.
This doesn't apply to countries that peg. China replaced the peg
with a basket, but it's heavily weighted to the dollar and really
hasn't had the same spread as other currencies.
scott
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00D9_01C79EE9.B7FC91E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Now I don't feel so bad over $75 a sheet for the 3/4" stuff I got from =
my hardwood dealer last winter. Might have gotten a cut rate due to the =
rest of the almost $2,000 order.
P D Q
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message =
news:[email protected]...
<[email protected]> wrote in message
> You know, as a sidebar to this, Home Depot sold quality plywood a =
few
> years ago. (5?- 7?) It was the same stuff I got at my hardwoods =
guy,
> even the same stamps sometimes. It was just a about 20% less.
You're right ... last time I got good Oak 3/4" ply from HD was around =
2002.
IIRC, it was around $42/sheet, which was a pretty good price at the =
time,
void free, relatively thick veneer compared to the higher wood =
boutique
prices, and much heavier than what they sell as plywood at any BORG =
today.
I just got a quote from my hardwood dealer yesterday for 3/4"x4x8 A1 =
rift
sawn red oak - $115.95/sheet; up $11/sheet since I bought the last =
load just
about one year ago.
Inflation? ... what inflation?
--=20
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 2/20/07
KarlC@ (the obvious)
------=_NextPart_000_00D9_01C79EE9.B7FC91E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Narrow" size=3D4>Now I don't feel so bad over =
$75 a sheet=20
for the 3/4" stuff I got from my hardwood dealer last winter. =
Might have=20
gotten a cut rate due to the rest of the almost $2,000 =
order.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Narrow" size=3D4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=3D"Script MT Bold" color=3D#0000ff size=3D6><EM>P D=20
Q</EM></FONT></DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Swingman" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:[email protected]">news:6fSdncVz=
[email protected]</A>...</DIV><BR><<A=20
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A>> =
wrote in=20
message<BR><BR>> You know, as a sidebar to this, Home Depot sold =
quality=20
plywood a few<BR>> years ago. (5?- 7?) It was the same =
stuff I=20
got at my hardwoods guy,<BR>> even the same stamps sometimes. =
It was=20
just a about 20% less.<BR><BR>You're right ... last time I got good =
Oak 3/4"=20
ply from HD was around 2002.<BR>IIRC, it was around $42/sheet, which =
was a=20
pretty good price at the time,<BR>void free, relatively thick veneer =
compared=20
to the higher wood boutique<BR>prices, and much heavier than what they =
sell as=20
plywood at any BORG today.<BR><BR>I just got a quote from my hardwood =
dealer=20
yesterday for 3/4"x4x8 A1 rift<BR>sawn red oak - $115.95/sheet; up =
$11/sheet=20
since I bought the last load just<BR>about one year =
ago.<BR><BR>Inflation? ...=20
what inflation?<BR><BR>-- <BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.e-woodshop.net">www.e-woodshop.net</A><BR>Last =
update:=20
2/20/07<BR>KarlC@ (the obvious)<BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_00D9_01C79EE9.B7FC91E0--
Welcome to the wonderful world of modern materials. I've used the birch
and oak ply from both Lowes and Home Depot. I never let 100 grit or anything
coarser than 150 get anywhere near it. As you've noticed, the face veneer
is extremely thin. I don't think there's much you can do do change this
without a time machine.
--
When the game is over, the pawn and the king are returned to the same box.
Larry Wasserman - Baltimore Maryland - lwasserm(a)sdf. lonestar.org
EXT wrote:
> What most Americans don't know is that the US currency is in the
toilet. I
> run a Canadian company which has 99% of its income in US dollars.
<snip>
Didn't realize the Canadian situation; however, I can tell you that
the USD is also in the tank vs the Euro.
Spending money you don't have, to finance a war, will do that.
Lew
On May 30, 3:41 pm, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Lesson: If volunteers are needed, just go. The command and control
> crap can all be sorted out when the immediate needs have
> been met. When lives are at stake, it's not about "who's in
> charge."
A good friend of mine from Ft Pierce FL went immediatly after Katrina
to try to help out. He's personally been hit badly by hurricanes, and
felt the need to help.
On the second day, he was told, in the strongest terms, to go home,
"that things were under control"..they'd call him.
He had water, a couple of generators, some fuel, food, a couple of
walkies...
go figure.
Robatoy wrote:
> How different the aftermath of Katrina would have been had there been
> a pile of rublle to stand on top of...with a bull-horn.
> The image of minorities paddling for dear life makes for lousy photo-
> ops.
What would be different? Why would a hurricane or flood care what race it
chose for victims? While major media did play the race card facts pretty
much didn't support it...death counts certainly didn't .....in fact much of
the initial wildly exaggerated claims for 10,000 or more dead and many of
the horror stories from the shelters were all bullshit as well.... but when
honest accountability gets in the way of a dramatic story why wreck it? The
initial system failure was all local including the re-elected black mayor.
That some hospitals or nursing homes were not evacuated is certainly of
local responsibility. That thousands choose to ignore the warnings and did
not leave rests solely with the individual as well. Further since the city
had a black majority and white deaths were not proportionate to their
population one might claim some white discrimination.
The FEDs are not ever first responders, nor constitutionally can they be, at
least if it involves the military.
Best case scenario ....when a city of a half of million, has nearly 80%
housing stock flooded.... realistically what could anyone do logistically
that would have made much difference in that first week or so that wasn't
done?......It does beg the question of why anyone thinks a major disaster is
painless and a not inconvenient. Rod
Every time someone starts this "walk or ride a bike" thing, I think, live in
Seattle for a year and see how practicle that is.
"B A R R Y" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 27 May 2007 22:51:03 GMT, Brian Henderson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> >Which doesn't help when you go shopping, does it?
>
> I shop on a bicycle often, with some thought and planning. With
> racks, panniers, and/or a big 'ol messenger bag, it's amazing what a
> cyclist can carry. Every day, I ride 5 miles with my laptop and some
> papers, dress clothes & shoes, breakfast and fruit, and misc small
> things (PDA , cell phone, Ipod, watch...) in a messenger bag.
>
> > You can't carry
> >groceries for a family on your bicycle, much less trying to carry a
> >dozen 4x8 sheets of plywood on your back. This is the woodworking
> >newsgroup after all. :)
>
> Did you know Steve Knight has used a bicycle with a trailer for wood
> runs? "Woodshop News" recently did an article about a cabinet shop
> that bought bikes for interested staff to ride to work. <G>
>
> I use my car and truck for some situations, as "whenever we can"
> dosen't have to mean *always*. 4x8 sheets, 12' 8/4 planks, 5 gallon
> lacquer cans, kitty litter, Diet Coke @ 5/12 packs for $10? Yeah, I
> drive with those. I also drive when it's really freakin' cold, in
> thunderstorms, or when the roads are snowy or icy.
>
> I don't use the bike for political reasons or simply to save fuel. My
> clothes or bikes don't have "one less car" written on them and I don't
> scowl motorists. <G> I like to drive my vehicles from cradle to
> grave, 2 mile trips are pretty tough on a vehicle. Cycling is fun
> and good for you, and I can hear the birds and see what's really going
> in the 'hood. Little kids at the bus stop wave to me. I arrive at
> work wide awake with a lot less coffee.
>
> By simply seeing 41 year old me doing it, three coworkers now ride to
> work on a regular basis. One of the guys is 54 and hadn't had a bike
> since he was a kid. Now he does a 40 mile round trip commute twice a
> week. I'm the "kid" of the group! <G>
Robatoy wrote:
| A good friend of mine from Ft Pierce FL went immediatly after
| Katrina to try to help out. He's personally been hit badly by
| hurricanes, and felt the need to help.
| On the second day, he was told, in the strongest terms, to go home,
| "that things were under control"..they'd call him.
| He had water, a couple of generators, some fuel, food, a couple of
| walkies...
Lesson: An emergency is, almost by definition, a situation that
is not under sufficient control to protect lives and
property.
When you next speak with your friend, please pass along my
appreciation for his efforts. If I'd gone there - as I should have -
I'd have had need of his generator after the second day.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Leon wrote:
| You may be thankful that you did not go. Those that went with
| tools and equipment very often left broke and in debt. There were
| several interviews with those that came to help, not because of
| the work that they were doing but because of their stolen
| equipment. Tractor trailers and all.
I'm not - and in fact I'm more than a little ashamed that I didn't
just load up and go anyway. There was (as in every disaster) a very
real need for communications. I'd already had enough experience with
tornado and flood operations to know that.
There's always a danger that equipment can "grow legs" and vanish, but
my entire station can (almost) easily tuck into a car trunk, and I've
discovered that "Danger - High Voltage" stickers work wonders as a
deterrent to the casual laying on of hands. :-)
FWIW, I've never had a piece of equipment stolen at an emergency
operation site - and I've never owned any that was more precious a
human. It was an acceptable risk.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Leon wrote:
| your heart is in the right place.
There were a lot of hearts in the right place. Entire /countries/ all
over the world were poised to help in any way they could - including
some whose help we could not possibly deserve - if we but gave the
nod. I doubt the Washington crowd gave their offers a second thought
either - but /this/ person won't forget.
If it shook me to see the Mexican military arrive to deliver
much-needed humanitarian assistance (Gracias, Amigos y Amigas!), I was
proud beyond words of our men and women of the Coast Guard who weren't
just ready, but willing, able, and effective.
There were many who opened not only their hearts, but their homes,
their places of worship, and their places of business to provide for a
virtual tsunami of refugees - and I hope that the people of the gulf
coast treasure them and their memory.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
On Sun, 27 May 2007 22:51:03 GMT, Brian Henderson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Which doesn't help when you go shopping, does it?
I shop on a bicycle often, with some thought and planning. With
racks, panniers, and/or a big 'ol messenger bag, it's amazing what a
cyclist can carry. Every day, I ride 5 miles with my laptop and some
papers, dress clothes & shoes, breakfast and fruit, and misc small
things (PDA , cell phone, Ipod, watch...) in a messenger bag.
> You can't carry
>groceries for a family on your bicycle, much less trying to carry a
>dozen 4x8 sheets of plywood on your back. This is the woodworking
>newsgroup after all. :)
Did you know Steve Knight has used a bicycle with a trailer for wood
runs? "Woodshop News" recently did an article about a cabinet shop
that bought bikes for interested staff to ride to work. <G>
I use my car and truck for some situations, as "whenever we can"
dosen't have to mean *always*. 4x8 sheets, 12' 8/4 planks, 5 gallon
lacquer cans, kitty litter, Diet Coke @ 5/12 packs for $10? Yeah, I
drive with those. I also drive when it's really freakin' cold, in
thunderstorms, or when the roads are snowy or icy.
I don't use the bike for political reasons or simply to save fuel. My
clothes or bikes don't have "one less car" written on them and I don't
scowl motorists. <G> I like to drive my vehicles from cradle to
grave, 2 mile trips are pretty tough on a vehicle. Cycling is fun
and good for you, and I can hear the birds and see what's really going
in the 'hood. Little kids at the bus stop wave to me. I arrive at
work wide awake with a lot less coffee.
By simply seeing 41 year old me doing it, three coworkers now ride to
work on a regular basis. One of the guys is 54 and hadn't had a bike
since he was a kid. Now he does a 40 mile round trip commute twice a
week. I'm the "kid" of the group! <G>
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Lesson: An emergency is, almost by definition, a situation that
> is not under sufficient control to protect lives and
> property.
>
> When you next speak with your friend, please pass along my
> appreciation for his efforts. If I'd gone there - as I should have -
> I'd have had need of his generator after the second day.
You may be thankful that you did not go. Those that went with tools and
equipment very often left broke and in debt. There were several interviews
with those that came to help, not because of the work that they were doing
but because of their stolen equipment. Tractor trailers and all.
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> I'm not - and in fact I'm more than a little ashamed that I didn't
> just load up and go anyway. There was (as in every disaster) a very
> real need for communications. I'd already had enough experience with
> tornado and flood operations to know that.
>
> There's always a danger that equipment can "grow legs" and vanish, but
> my entire station can (almost) easily tuck into a car trunk, and I've
> discovered that "Danger - High Voltage" stickers work wonders as a
> deterrent to the casual laying on of hands. :-)
>
> FWIW, I've never had a piece of equipment stolen at an emergency
> operation site - and I've never owned any that was more precious a
> human. It was an acceptable risk.
Good for you Morris, your heart is in the right place.
"CW" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> Every time someone starts this "walk or ride a bike" thing, I think,
> live in Seattle for a year and see how practicle that is.
>
I agree. Be practical. If you have to go to the drugstore around the
corner, walk or bicycle. If you have to go to the lumberyard 2 towns over
for a few 4x8 sheets, probably take the car!
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Lew Hodgett wrote:
> | Morris Dovey wrote:
> |
> || Robatoy summarized the solution process fairly well and reminded me
> || that it's not that we lack practical solutions, it's that we lack
> || the will to implement.
> |
> | Nobody wants to see their ox gored.
> |
> | As soon as people can see personal gain, it will happen.
>
> That doesn't bode well. Consider the lessons of Katrina...
>
> --
> Morris Dovey
> DeSoto Solar
> DeSoto, Iowa USA
> http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Would that be the "don't build a large city below sea level" lesson or
another one?
todd
In article <[email protected]>, "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I started noticing fuel Surcharges when fuel prices hit the $1.50 mark 45 or
>so years ago. USP and Orkin started adding it to the bills.
Really? Gas was a buck and a half a gallon in 1962??
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.
Indeed, they often have good deals on odd lots plus have a very good
selection of regular stuff. My only complaint is that they are not
open on Sundays. I also haunt Mr. Plywood in NE Portland.
Bob the Tomato
>If I recall your local to me (Vancouver area).....have you ever tried
>Shurway(on St. Johns rd)?.....they have quite a selection of hardwood ply
>(lots), hardwood lumber and other interesting odds and ends. Prices seem
>competitive and even sometimes low. I haven't bought full sheets lately but
>last fall they had stacks of 2ft by 4ft birch panels (less than $8.00 ea)
>that worked great for a few small projects.....Rod
>
On Sat, 26 May 2007 00:09:47 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>Euro used to cost approximately $0.85 (at its low point). Now it costs
>$1.35 or so. That means that with respect to the euro, the dollar has lost
>close to 70% of its value. Of course, gasoline here in the US is still
>very cheap compared to Europe - about Euro 1.42 per liter in Wageningen,
>Netherlands. If I calculate correctly, that comes to ~US$7.30 per gallon,
>or more than twice the price in North Jersey.
Yes, but in Europe, they have cars with much, much better gas
efficiency so it all comes out in the wash for the most part. Here,
we have too many idiots driving gas guzzling SUVs and whining about
gas prices. Um... duh?
On Fri, 25 May 2007 20:13:30 -0400, B A R R Y <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Actually, not a bad idea, at least for the northeast, southeast,
>Chicagoland, and So Cal. US.
There really is no way to have effective mass transit in Southern
California without tearing down the entire state and starting over.
It just wasn't designed that way. Most of the currently existing mass
transit we have runs nearly empty because it just doesn't fulfill the
needs of the majority of potential users.
On May 29, 9:46 am, Charlie Self <[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually, he probably figured everyone read the dialy >newspapers
Thank the heavens above we can all trust the press, eh?
Where would we be without their bright light of truth...
Here's a great example of the press in action during Katrina:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/39162/south_park_katrina/
And for anyone that actually watches it, yes, I know, it's a cartoon.
But it confused me for a while as I couldn't tell it from the
jackasses in the regular press.
Robert
On Sun, 27 May 2007 23:32:03 -0500, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Robatoy wrote:
>| On May 27, 10:39 pm, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote:
>|
>|| or does it mean 'develop a plan and take action'?
>||
>| But FIRST we do a feasibility study to see if the desired path
>| warrants a steering committee in order to fund a research group in
>| order to see if we can synchronise all the lobbies and focus groups
>| to make discoveries to establish re-electabilty. After they write a
>| proposal to investigate the ramifications due to financial and
>| environmental impact of any and all proposals...when we get that all
>| ironed out, it's time to move on to the next big step: we drum up
>| support by printing leaflets which we will hand out at all the White
>| Castle outlets. THEN we develop a plan. As long as it doesn't impact
>| the Slippy-Bellied Snail population and/or the spotted owls. Oh..
>| and we need to hire some lawyers.
>|
>| Is that what you mean, Morris?
>|
>| o¿o
>|
>| (tongue firmly planted in cheek)
>
>Tongue in cheek or not, there's enough truth in that to be downright
>discouraging.
>
> 'develop a plan and take action' ::= 'talk it to death'
OTOH, there are times when that is *not* a bad idea.
I've seen the result of too many times when someone says, "It's time to
quit analyzing and time to *do* something." 9 times out of 10 that
*something* is exactly the wrong thing, but by golly we *did* something!
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Mark & Juanita wrote:
| On Sun, 27 May 2007 23:32:03 -0500, "Morris Dovey"
| <[email protected]> wrote:
|
|| Robatoy wrote:
||| On May 27, 10:39 pm, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote:
|||
|||| or does it mean 'develop a plan and take action'?
||||
||| But FIRST we do a feasibility study to see if the desired path
||| warrants a steering committee in order to fund a research group in
||| order to see if we can synchronise all the lobbies and focus
||| groups to make discoveries to establish re-electabilty. After
||| they write a proposal to investigate the ramifications due to
||| financial and environmental impact of any and all
||| proposals...when we get that all ironed out, it's time to move on
||| to the next big step: we drum up support by printing leaflets
||| which we will hand out at all the White Castle outlets. THEN we
||| develop a plan. As long as it doesn't impact the Slippy-Bellied
||| Snail population and/or the spotted owls. Oh.. and we need to
||| hire some lawyers.
|||
||| Is that what you mean, Morris?
|||
||| o¿o
|||
||| (tongue firmly planted in cheek)
||
|| Tongue in cheek or not, there's enough truth in that to be
|| downright discouraging.
||
|| 'develop a plan and take action' ::= 'talk it to death'
|
| OTOH, there are times when that is *not* a bad idea.
|
| I've seen the result of too many times when someone says, "It's
| time to quit analyzing and time to *do* something." 9 times out of
| 10 that *something* is exactly the wrong thing, but by golly we
| *did* something!
So have I - and in nearly every case it's because no one asked:
"What's the worst that could happen?"
We might consider: "What's the worst that could happen if we continue
to do what we've been doing?" The answer to this question may help us
to define the level of risk acceptable in alternative solutions. Let's
stipulate that there is no choice without /some/ associated risk.
It's also worth asking if a large problem can be subdivided so as to
be solved piecewise, and which of the partial solutions offer no
downside.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Leon wrote:
| Having been through a disaster like that, the people themselves
| have to take responsibility in helping them selves. Fema could
| have been there moments after the storm and there would still would
| have been the devestation and the people with out homes. It was a
| natural disaster of epic proportions. Not a whole lot was reported
| about the winds of the storm which was the really dangerous part.
| More was reported on the water after the storm. Too bad the mayor
| let the school buses sit and be flooded. Before hand planing and
| prefaration was the real problem.
Lesson: Contingency planning is essential.
Lesson: A transportation plan is manditory.
Want to bet that they still haven't identified staging areas for
moving supplies in and people out next time around?
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On May 29, 9:46 am, Charlie Self <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Actually, he probably figured everyone read the dialy >newspapers
>
> Thank the heavens above we can all trust the press, eh?
> Where would we be without their bright light of truth...
>
> Here's a great example of the press in action during Katrina:
>
> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/39162/south_park_katrina/
>
> And for anyone that actually watches it, yes, I know, it's a cartoon.
> But it confused me for a while as I couldn't tell it from the
> jackasses in the regular press.
>
> Robert
>
Cartoon caracters, but actually how it play out.
Having been through a disaster like that, the people themselves have to take
responsibility in helping them selves. Fema could have been there moments
after the storm and there would still would have been the devestation and
the people with out homes. It was a natural disaster of epic proportions.
Not a whole lot was reported about the winds of the storm which was the
really dangerous part. More was reported on the water after the storm. Too
bad the mayor let the school buses sit and be flooded. Before hand planing
and prefaration was the real problem.
Nothing difficult about it if you don't mind arriving wet.
"B A R R Y" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Rain isn't
> as difficult for cycling as many think.
>
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Leon wrote:
>
> | Having been through a disaster like that, the people themselves
> | have to take responsibility in helping them selves. Fema could
> | have been there moments after the storm and there would still would
> | have been the devestation and the people with out homes. It was a
> | natural disaster of epic proportions. Not a whole lot was reported
> | about the winds of the storm which was the really dangerous part.
> | More was reported on the water after the storm. Too bad the mayor
> | let the school buses sit and be flooded. Before hand planing and
> | prefaration was the real problem.
>
> Lesson: Contingency planning is essential.
> Lesson: A transportation plan is manditory.
>
> Want to bet that they still haven't identified staging areas for
> moving supplies in and people out next time around?
No doubt. I still recall seeing the aerial view of the "hundreds" of
school buses sitting under water that could have been used to evacuate.
More than enough to have emptied the Superdome so the Super Dome could have
remained empty and none of those people would have had to live in that mess.
Next time I bet they make sure the fuel tanks are empty before the storm to
guard against contamination when they flood again.
On Mon, 28 May 2007 20:07:52 GMT, Brian Henderson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Mon, 28 May 2007 12:23:27 GMT, "CW" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Every time someone starts this "walk or ride a bike" thing, I think, live in
>>Seattle for a year and see how practicle that is.
>
>Heh, good point. I had a friend who lived just outside of Portland
What's funny is that my commuting bike is named after Portland. <G>
A very bicycle friendly city, even if the weather isn't. Rain isn't
as difficult for cycling as many think.
<http://www.portlandonline.com/transportation/index.cfm?a=hbied&c=deibc>
On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:04:37 -0600, "Thom" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Funny - I usually have better luck with Home Depot for plywood then I do
>with Lowes.
Be aware that some of the plywood in BORG stores (blue and orange)
actually comes from local distributors.
I can call a local wholesale plywood distributor, bring the info to my
local HD Pro Desk, and have the material the next day. I _have_ to
know exactly what I want when I deal with HD, but I can get slatwall,
phenolic board, bending plywood, or just about any hardwood veneer.
If I need a decent amount, I'll still haul my cargo trailer to my
favorite hardwood dealer, a 35 mile round trip, but HD is less than 2
miles away. The same wholesaler will ship non-stock product to the
hardwood dealer or my buddy's bicycle shop, if I order enough.
On Fri, 25 May 2007 10:11:16 -0500, HerHusband <[email protected]>
wrote:
>There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent somewhere...
>:)
>
>I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets of
>3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home
>Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
>
>I paid $40 a sheet
>
>The plywood sucks, the fault obviously lies with me. I didn't inspect the sheets closely enough.
>
>Live and learn...
>
>Anthony
I bought about the same kind of plywood as you did last summer. I had
two projects in line to do, I thought I could tackle them both lickety
split. Wrong! I did the one that didn't require the plywood, I used
the MDF I'd bought for the other (oval mirror.) Anyway, I noticed
during the construction of the other project, that the sheets of birch
veneer plywood curled. There's no way they're flat. Not even close.
I was wondering WTF went wrong. Yes, it's in my basement shop, but
still, I've got other sheets of veneer plywood that aren't doing that.
I was thinking of going to a traditional lumberyard in the hopes that
they'll have plywood that won't curl. Or have the defects you've
outlined.
On Fri, 25 May 2007 18:55:34 -0500, Chuck Taylor
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Congress has for decades been spending money it doesn't have. It
>really doesn't matter whether it's to finance wars or welfare.
But it's only been since the Reagan years that we've seen
multi-trillion dollar debt generated for absolutely nothing.
On Sun, 27 May 2007 16:49:44 -0500, "HeyBub" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Michigan is an economic basket case. And there is a move afoot to raise
>taxes even more.
Look more closely and you'd find the whole of the US is an economic
basket case held loosely together by house price inflation. When it
all goes tits-up it's a pity that the fallout from this poor financial
management will be felt worldwide.
--
On Fri, 25 May 2007 23:15:23 GMT, Lew Hodgett
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Didn't realize the Canadian situation; however, I can tell you that
>the USD is also in the tank vs the Euro.
>
>Spending money you don't have, to finance a war, will do that.
Congress has for decades been spending money it doesn't have. It
really doesn't matter whether it's to finance wars or welfare.
--
Chuck Taylor
http://home.hiwaay.net/~taylorc/contact/
In article <[email protected]>,
"EXT" <[email protected]> wrote:
> What most Americans don't know is that the US currency is in the toilet. I
> run a Canadian company which has 99% of its income in US dollars. Our
> revenue is up but when converted to Canadian dollars it becomes less than
> years before. I used to get $1.60 Canadian for every one US dollar, now I
> only get $1.08 per US dollar and the experts say that the two currencies
> will be par by year end.
>
I travel to Canada almost every month, trust me, I've noticed. Just
wish I'd bought $10K in Canadian years ago... The Euro is at an all-time
high, the British pound is at a 26 year high, on and on
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Personal e-mail is the n7bsn but at amsat.org
This posting address is a spam-trap and seldom read
RV and Camping FAQ can be found at
http://www.ralphandellen.us/rv
"HerHusband" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent somewhere...
> :)
>
> I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets of
> 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home
> Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
>
> I didn't notice it till I got home and unloaded, but the faces of the
> sheet had numerous blemishes and patches (both sides). I should have
> looked it over better at the store, BEFORE I started cutting. :)
> Thankfully, I managed to cut around the major blemishes, or hide them in
> places where they can't be seen. Unfortunately, this left me a little
> short, so now I need to pick up a quarter sheet to build the last two
> shelves.
>
> The plywood is also riddled with numerous voids. I don't think I have
> made a cut yet that hasn't had pieces of the core falling out.
>
Thanks for posting. Now I know where not to buy plywood. I bought some from
Menards. I had to go through the stack before I found 4 acceptable sheets.
> Even the grain pattern of the sheets is less than attractive. I'm not
> sure what kind of birch trees they got the wood from, but this stuff is
> ugly! :)
>
> Perhaps worst of all, the surface veneers are extremely thin and fragile.
> It appears to be thinner than a sheet of paper. I bought brand new saw
> blades for making this project, and the chipout is absolutely horrible. I
> also sanded a couple of pieces yesterday, and can sand through the veneer
> in less than 20 seconds with 100 grit paper. Now my project is almost
> finished, and I'm almost scared to sand it for fear of sanding through
> the veneer and exposing the core.
>
> Worst of all, I paid $40 a sheet for this stuff at Home Depot, and then
> saw MUCH better quality lumber at Lowes (where I normally get my plywood)
> for only $30 a sheet.
>
> The plywood sucks, but a lot of the fault obviously lies with me. I made
> the mistake of shopping on a weekend, when the rest of the DIY crowd was
> crowding into the store. I thought the convenience of having my wife and
> daughter there to help load the cart would be nice. But, in my attempt to
> get in and out of the store, I didn't inspect the sheets closely enough.
>
> Anyway, I'm almost finished with my entertainment center and am happy
> with the way it is turning out. Despite the poor quality lumber, I have
> managed to hide the worst blemishes. If I can pull off sanding the
> project next week without destroying it, there's still a chance it might
> turn out OK.
>
> Live and learn...
>
> Anthony
Morris Dovey wrote:
>
> The lesson: It would appear to be a mistake to make important
> decisions based on expected behavior of government - regardless of
> whether those expectations involve public safety or energy policy.
I'd say that to put your life style in the hands of others is definitely
not prudent.
If memory serves me correctly, the state of Louisiana ranks in the top 3
states in the receipt of federal monies. Has been that way for years.
Maybe there is good reason for it, but it does develop a mind set among
the residents that help is on the way.
Lew
"HerHusband" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> There's no point to this message, other than I need to vent somewhere...
> :)
>
> I'm building a new entertainment center and just bought three sheets of
> 3/4" birch plywood and one sheet of 1/2" birch plywood from my local Home
> Depot. This has to be some of the worst plywood I have ever purchased!
>
> I didn't notice it till I got home and unloaded, but the faces of the
> sheet had numerous blemishes and patches (both sides). I should have
> looked it over better at the store, BEFORE I started cutting. :)
> Thankfully, I managed to cut around the major blemishes, or hide them in
> places where they can't be seen. Unfortunately, this left me a little
> short, so now I need to pick up a quarter sheet to build the last two
> shelves.
Learning to look at what you are buying is a good practice.
BUT when the plywood becomes delaminated or pieces start falling out I Take
It Back. Sure it is cut but the piece is defective, how would you know if
you had not cut it?