I know it's a commonplace around here, but I just have to vent.
I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
saw, which also is supposedly just a shade over half as powerful as my
$50 skilsaw. Who the hell makes this stuff up?
That's all. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
"boorite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I know it's a commonplace around here, but I just have to vent.
>
> I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
> a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
> saw, which also is supposedly just a shade over half as powerful as my
> $50 skilsaw. Who the hell makes this stuff up?
>
> That's all. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
>
>
Since HP is the result of a calculation that includes RPM, bizarre ratings
can occur.
http://www.reliance.com/mtr/flaclcmn.htm
Good site for formulas.
Dave
boorite wrote:
> I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
> a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
> saw,
If you're measuring electrical input power, then I've got a 4
horsepower kitchen toaster, and that doesn't even move. If you allow
electricity wasted as heat into the calculation, then you can get some
perverse measurements. As vacuums move a lot of air that they also use
for cooling, they're usually designed to be woefully inefficient in the
search for cheap power. It might even _be_ mechanically quite powerful
- some of them are, despite their small size and weight.
My table saw is not only rated at 3HP, that's real 3HP at almost any
speed, without risk of burning out.
So, looking at realistic HP ratings (not shop vac sensationalized
values), my table saw is a 230 volt, 3hp motor. My router is a 120v
3hp motor. TS spins about 3 to 4 000 RPM, router can go up to 22K. I
still find it difficult to comprehend that the two motors are rated the
same. (And I trust Porter Cable!).
Does the output speed make the router rate as high as the TS?
Obviously it is not turning as heavy a cutter as the TS.
Marc
Jim wrote:
> "boorite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >I know it's a commonplace around here, but I just have to vent.
> >
> > I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
> > a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
> > saw, which also is supposedly just a shade over half as powerful as my
> > $50 skilsaw. Who the hell makes this stuff up?
> >
> > That's all. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
> >
> Me too. Perhaps you should understand more about horsepower ratings.
>
> The purveyors of this stuff rate motorins things like the Shop Vac as the
> product of the maximum amperage times the maximum voltage. And, they don't
> worry about such niceties as temperature rise.
>
> However, motors for machinery such as table saws are rated at the average
> power (which is 1/2 of what the above calculations show) and for an
> intermittent load. This load results in a temperature rise of 60F above
> ambient temperature. Thus, machinery motors are conservatively rated
> whereas those other are wildly optimisticall rated.
>
> Jim
"boorite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I know it's a commonplace around here, but I just have to vent.
>
> I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
> a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
> saw, which also is supposedly just a shade over half as powerful as my
> $50 skilsaw. Who the hell makes this stuff up?
>
> That's all. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
>
I'm going to take the motor off of my shopvac and put it on my tablesaw. Not
only is it more powerful, it's smaller! Technology is wonderful.
You shouldn't. On a 120 volt, 15 amp circuit, even 2.5 horsepower is
impossible.
"marc rosen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I
(And I trust Porter Cable!).
"RonB" <[email protected]> wrote in news:_NDQg.1487$Go3.1277@dukeread05:
>>> Have you been reading any Sears advertisements by chance?
>>
>> My God! How did you know?
>
> Sears has had more ways to sidestep specifications and other features
> than any distributor I can recall. Remember 'starting horsepower'?
> That is probably what started their credibility gap with us older
> farts. You never know what they are talking about.
>
> RonB
>
>
From RepairFAQ.orgs humour page:
About Sears Shop Vac HP Ratings
(From: Kevin AstirCS "1U" KO0B ([email protected]).) I note that
air compressor manufacturers have taken after the vacuum sweeper folks,
and are re-inventing the horsepower. Imagine, 6HP at 15A, 115VAC!
(From: sam).
Have you seen Sears shop vacs lately? I think they are also up to 6 HP.
Every week or so, they seem to come out with one that is a little higher
in their HP ratings - I guess internal cold fusion or something.
(From: Pin 2 Hot ([email protected]).)
Let's see, RPM X Torque = Horsepower.
Thus: No-load RPM X Locked-rotor Torque = Sears Horsepower
Notes:
1. testing done at 177V DC, equal to peak of 120V AC (AC-DC motors).
2. Sears Horsepower: How "hoarse" you get trying to talk over one of
their shop-vacs while it's on.
Or maybe it's got something to do with vacuuming performance out at the
stables.
Source (again) RepairFAQ.org's humour page.
http://repairfaq.org/sam/humor.htm
Puckdropper
--
Wise is the man who attempts to answer his question before asking it.
To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:49:26 -0400, "Locutus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"boorite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>I know it's a commonplace around here, but I just have to vent.
>>
>> I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
>> a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
>> saw, which also is supposedly just a shade over half as powerful as my
>> $50 skilsaw. Who the hell makes this stuff up?
>>
>> That's all. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
>>
>
>I'm going to take the motor off of my shopvac and put it on my tablesaw. Not
>only is it more powerful, it's smaller! Technology is wonderful.
>
I might put mine on the wife's blazer *g*
Mac
https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis
https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis/wood_stuff.htm
hello,
"marc rosen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> So, looking at realistic HP ratings
> my table saw is a 230 volt, 3hp motor. (spins at 4000 RPM)
formula: HP = T * RPM / 5252 (T in lb/ft). Thus T = (HP*5252)/RPM
Let us assume that the peak HP is at 4000 RPM (induction engine), this means
that to generate 3 HP, the ST will need around 4 lb /ft of torque. with a 10
" blade (5" radius), this mesures to 9.5 lbs at the teeth...
> My router is a 120v 3hp motor. (spins at 22K)
same calculation: .7 lbs /ft of torque on the router, with a 1/2 radius bit,
this is 17 lbs of pressure at the teeth...
> I still find it difficult to comprehend that the two motors are rated the
> same. (And I trust Porter Cable!).
> Does the output speed make the router rate as high as the TS?
yep, directly proportional... note, it is easier to make a fast spining
engine have high power than a slow spining engine as less power torque needs
to be generated...
> Obviously it is not turning as heavy a cutter as the TS.
the overall weight of the cutter is negligeable compared with the weight
distribution (ie: how far from the axis is the weight).
note, 1 HP = 745 W and 1 W = 1 V*A so if your tool is rated to draw up to
15A at 120V = 1800W = 2.4HP, you know, that, because of various losts in
heat, friction and the fact that this is a maximum that probably never gets
reached, the tool is capable of at max 2.4HP, and likely to be much closer
to 1/2 to 3/4 of that value.
cyrille
>> Have you been reading any Sears advertisements by chance?
>
> My God! How did you know?
Sears has had more ways to sidestep specifications and other features than
any distributor I can recall. Remember 'starting horsepower'? That is
probably what started their credibility gap with us older farts. You never
know what they are talking about.
RonB
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:53:58 -0400, Joe Gorman <[email protected]> wrote:
>mac davis wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:49:26 -0400, "Locutus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> "boorite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> I know it's a commonplace around here, but I just have to vent.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
>>>> a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
>>>> saw, which also is supposedly just a shade over half as powerful as my
>>>> $50 skilsaw. Who the hell makes this stuff up?
>>>>
>>>> That's all. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
>>>>
>>> I'm going to take the motor off of my shopvac and put it on my tablesaw. Not
>>> only is it more powerful, it's smaller! Technology is wonderful.
>>>
>> I might put mine on the wife's blazer *g*
>>
>> Mac
>>
>> https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis
>> https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis/wood_stuff.htm
>You'd spend all your savings on it buying extension cords:-)
>Joe
Good point, Joe... I don't think our 400 watt invertor would run it.. lol
Mac
https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis
https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis/wood_stuff.htm
You are quite welcome.
Have you been reading any Sears advertisements by chance?
RonB
"boorite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I know it's a commonplace around here, but I just have to vent.
>
> I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
> a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
> saw, which also is supposedly just a shade over half as powerful as my
> $50 skilsaw. Who the hell makes this stuff up?
>
> That's all. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
>
"boorite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I know it's a commonplace around here, but I just have to vent.
>
> I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
> a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
> saw, which also is supposedly just a shade over half as powerful as my
> $50 skilsaw. Who the hell makes this stuff up?
>
> That's all. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
>
Me too. Perhaps you should understand more about horsepower ratings.
The purveyors of this stuff rate motorins things like the Shop Vac as the
product of the maximum amperage times the maximum voltage. And, they don't
worry about such niceties as temperature rise.
However, motors for machinery such as table saws are rated at the average
power (which is 1/2 of what the above calculations show) and for an
intermittent load. This load results in a temperature rise of 60F above
ambient temperature. Thus, machinery motors are conservatively rated
whereas those other are wildly optimisticall rated.
Jim
mac davis wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:49:26 -0400, "Locutus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> "boorite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> I know it's a commonplace around here, but I just have to vent.
>>>
>>> I would like to meet the marketing people who expect me to believe that
>>> a 16-gallon ShopVac is 4 times more powerful than a $500 contractor's
>>> saw, which also is supposedly just a shade over half as powerful as my
>>> $50 skilsaw. Who the hell makes this stuff up?
>>>
>>> That's all. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
>>>
>> I'm going to take the motor off of my shopvac and put it on my tablesaw. Not
>> only is it more powerful, it's smaller! Technology is wonderful.
>>
> I might put mine on the wife's blazer *g*
>
> Mac
>
> https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis
> https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis/wood_stuff.htm
You'd spend all your savings on it buying extension cords:-)
Joe
On 21 Sep 2006 18:15:50 -0700, "marc rosen" <[email protected]> wrote:
From what Jim said, if I understood it, the table saw could actually max at
maybe 6 hp...
>So, looking at realistic HP ratings (not shop vac sensationalized
>values), my table saw is a 230 volt, 3hp motor. My router is a 120v
>3hp motor. TS spins about 3 to 4 000 RPM, router can go up to 22K. I
>still find it difficult to comprehend that the two motors are rated the
>same. (And I trust Porter Cable!).
>Does the output speed make the router rate as high as the TS?
>Obviously it is not turning as heavy a cutter as the TS.
> Marc
<snip>>
>Jim wrote:
>> Me too. Perhaps you should understand more about horsepower ratings.
>>
>> The purveyors of this stuff rate motorins things like the Shop Vac as the
>> product of the maximum amperage times the maximum voltage. And, they don't
>> worry about such niceties as temperature rise.
>>
>> However, motors for machinery such as table saws are rated at the average
>> power (which is 1/2 of what the above calculations show) and for an
>> intermittent load. This load results in a temperature rise of 60F above
>> ambient temperature. Thus, machinery motors are conservatively rated
>> whereas those other are wildly optimisticall rated.
>>
>> Jim
Mac
https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis
https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis/wood_stuff.htm