In the agricultural sense of course!
"[email protected]" wrote:
> Methinks they define "customer service" as "service the customer"!
>
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:21:39 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >And while we are on the subject, what is also amazing, at least to those of
> >us old enough to note the difference between then and now, is the
> >terminology used by corporations to foster the impression that they give a
> >shit, like "customer care" and "customer service" ... if there are any words
> >more contradictory in today's lexicon, I've yet to see them, particularly if
> >a telephone is involved.
I'm old enough to remember when "Made in Germany" and "Made in Japan" meant
second-rate goods, not just Taiwan and China.
Wagers that ten years from now it'll be Indonesia or something?
"John" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
> China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> English language.
>
It won't be long before the US military has to order it's battleships from
Tiawan and it's missles from mainland China because there are no skilled
workers nor competent factories that can make them.
"Mark L." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> How about the US congressman who found out that berets for one branch of
> the Service (IIRC Army Rangers???) were MIC (Made In China). How far?
> What about American flags? Yup, seen them. And I also saw some hand
> stamps that are made to stamp "Made in America" that were manufactured
> in Taiwan.... Welcome to the 'Global Economy'. (Hate that phrase)
> Mark L.
>
> John wrote:
>
> > How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
> > China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> > English language.
> >
>
Whole army. My kid says he hates 'em, because it makes them look French.
"Mark L." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> How about the US congressman who found out that berets for one branch of
> the Service (IIRC Army Rangers???) were MIC (Made In China). How far?
The machine has no nationality.
"Mark L." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> How true. I'm a tool and die maker who has been in the trade for 25
> years and now I'm seeing 9 out of 10 toolmakers I know retraining for a
> different career path. Most dies and molds are built and run in China.
>
> Eric Tonks wrote:
> > It won't be long before the US military has to order it's battleships
from
> > Tiawan and it's missles from mainland China because there are no skilled
> > workers nor competent factories that can make them.
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
George responds:
>The machine has no nationality.
>
>"Mark L." <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> How true. I'm a tool and die maker who has been in the trade for 25
>> years and now I'm seeing 9 out of 10 toolmakers I know retraining for a
>> different career path. Most dies and molds are built and run in China.
>>
>> Eric Tonks wrote:
>> > It won't be long before the US military has to order it's battleships
>from
>> > Tiawan and it's missles from mainland China because there are no skilled
>> > workers nor competent factories that can make them.
True. But what happens if US foreign policy goes against the grain of China or
Taiwan? They then refuse to manufacture whatever it is the US needs to create
policy, and whoops! You can bet your tuchus we're then going to see some
factories and foundries recreated.
Charlie Self
"Democracy is a process by which people are free to choose the man who will get
the blame." Laurence J. Peter
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:27:56 -0400, "George" <george@least> wrote:
>Nope, too many years of litigation involved. Not to mention we'd have to
>recreate the machine tool industry first.
>
>
and that in the face of sanctions to prevent washington from building
weapons of mass destruction....
>"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> George responds:
>>
>> >The machine has no nationality.
>
>
>>
>> True. But what happens if US foreign policy goes against the grain of
>China or
>> Taiwan? They then refuse to manufacture whatever it is the US needs to
>create
>> policy, and whoops! You can bet your tuchus we're then going to see some
>> factories and foundries recreated.
>
Nope, too many years of litigation involved. Not to mention we'd have to
recreate the machine tool industry first.
"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> George responds:
>
> >The machine has no nationality.
>
> True. But what happens if US foreign policy goes against the grain of
China or
> Taiwan? They then refuse to manufacture whatever it is the US needs to
create
> policy, and whoops! You can bet your tuchus we're then going to see some
> factories and foundries recreated.
George notes:
>
>Nope, too many years of litigation involved. Not to mention we'd have to
>recreate the machine tool industry first.
>
>
>"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> George responds:
>>
>> >The machine has no nationality.
>
>
>>
>> True. But what happens if US foreign policy goes against the grain of
>China or
>> Taiwan? They then refuse to manufacture whatever it is the US needs to
>create
>> policy, and whoops! You can bet your tuchus we're then going to see some
>> factories and foundries recreated.
>
Nah. If Bush gets re-elected and decides to wipe N. Korea off the map, you can
reasonably assume China won't supply any more berets. Actually, that's not a
good example. The Army found another supplier as soon as it read the "Made In
China" tag.
Charlie Self
"Democracy is a process by which people are free to choose the man who will get
the blame." Laurence J. Peter
George wrote:
> Nope, too many years of litigation involved. Not to mention we'd have to
> recreate the machine tool industry first.
If it got down to an impending war with China then you can bet that
litigation would not be an issue--when Congress decides that the lawyers
need to be told to take a hike the lawyers will take a hike, and when
Congress figures out that once the Chinese take over they will all fail of
re-election (the worst disaster that can possibly befall the universe, from
the viewpoint of a politician, is that that politician fail of re-election)
then they will decide to serve notice on the lawyers.
Constitutional Amendment--"no person practicing law in the United States may
be paid more than fifty percent of the mean income of a machinist of
equivalent experience and no person may practice law in the United States
until they have demonstrated proficiency in the operation of machine
tools."
As for recreating the machine tool industry, that's a more serious concern.
> "Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> George responds:
>>
>> >The machine has no nationality.
>
>
>>
>> True. But what happens if US foreign policy goes against the grain of
> China or
>> Taiwan? They then refuse to manufacture whatever it is the US needs to
> create
>> policy, and whoops! You can bet your tuchus we're then going to see some
>> factories and foundries recreated.
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
In the 50's.
Lots of cheap tin came from there.
"Doug Miller" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, "George" <george@least> wrote:
> >I'm old enough to remember when "Made in Germany" and "Made in Japan"
meant
> >second-rate goods, not just Taiwan and China.
> >
> Japan, sure, but when did "Made in Germany" _ever_ mean second-rate?
How about the US congressman who found out that berets for one branch of
the Service (IIRC Army Rangers???) were MIC (Made In China). How far?
What about American flags? Yup, seen them. And I also saw some hand
stamps that are made to stamp "Made in America" that were manufactured
in Taiwan.... Welcome to the 'Global Economy'. (Hate that phrase)
Mark L.
John wrote:
> How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
> China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> English language.
>
"John" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
> China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> English language.
..and to think we owe it all to Richard Milhous Nixon....
Larry
In article <[email protected]>, "George" <george@least> wrote:
>I'm old enough to remember when "Made in Germany" and "Made in Japan" meant
>second-rate goods, not just Taiwan and China.
>
Japan, sure, but when did "Made in Germany" _ever_ mean second-rate?
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter
by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com
You must use your REAL email address to get a response.
> How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
> China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> English language.
>
I would rather use harbour freight's chinese bar clamps than sears's plastic handled
ones... a lot of good basic iron like that comes from China. I just ordered ten 1/2"
pipe clamps, after sampling ones from an instore purchase, $2.99 ea. and work great!
It is a better deal than 14.99 ea. pony ones made in the US!
Alex
Blame it on NAFTA (Now America is F***ednin The Ass). Passed by politicians
already retired and got their money so to hell with us.
John" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
> China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> English language.
>
Brian Homan writes:
>Blame it on NAFTA (Now America is F***ednin The Ass). Passed by politicians
>already retired and got their money so to hell with us.
>John" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
>> China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
>> English language.
>>
Actually, that's North American Free Trade Agreement which doesn't have a
f***king thing to do with China. The aim was Mexico and Canada, which created
enough turmoil.
Some birds are coming home to roost, though: I've read that some Mexican jobs,
imported from the U.S., are now being exported to China, Malaysia, et al.
Another scary part is the export of many, maybe most, customer service jobs to
India. Having had personal experience of Dell's version of this, with one of
their "fluent" English speakers, I have to hope it doesn't move on to China.
It's a horror story from the customer's point of view already.
Charlie Self
"Democracy is a process by which people are free to choose the man who will get
the blame." Laurence J. Peter
Charlie Self wrote:
> Brian Homan writes:
>
>>Blame it on NAFTA (Now America is F***ednin The Ass). Passed by
>>politicians already retired and got their money so to hell with us.
>>John" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
>>> China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
>>> English language.
>>>
>
> Actually, that's North American Free Trade Agreement which doesn't have a
> f***king thing to do with China. The aim was Mexico and Canada, which
> created enough turmoil.
>
> Some birds are coming home to roost, though: I've read that some Mexican
> jobs, imported from the U.S., are now being exported to China, Malaysia,
> et al.
>
> Another scary part is the export of many, maybe most, customer service
> jobs to India. Having had personal experience of Dell's version of this,
> with one of their "fluent" English speakers, I have to hope it doesn't
> move on to China. It's a horror story from the customer's point of view
> already.
China would be an improvement in one way--at least they'd have people who
could read the manuals for the stuff in their original language--I can
imagine some guy in India for whom English is a second language trying to
make sense of some of the transliterated Cantonese manuals that I've seen
and going postal, or whatever they do in India when job stress removes
sanity.
> Charlie Self
> "Democracy is a process by which people are free to choose the man who
> will get the blame." Laurence J. Peter
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
"Mark L." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> How true. I'm a tool and die maker who has been in the trade for 25
> years and now I'm seeing 9 out of 10 toolmakers I know retraining for a
> different career path. Most dies and molds are built and run in China.
Sad, but we have no choice.
We have some molds made in Korea. Not only a cost factor, but also delivery
times. We just got a tool in last week. If it was to be made in the US, we
would not have the business from our customer as they had a delivery for a
new product that had to be met and they would have used other means to pack
their product.
US mold maker in Illinois:
Cost $18,000
Lead time: 10 weeks. 8 weeks if we paid a premium
Quality: Good No test shots.
Mold maker in Austria:
Cost: $17,000
Lead time: 8 to 10 weeks plus transit time
Quality: Good. Test shots shipped for approval before mold is shipped.
Mold maker in Korea:
Cost: $8600 including air freight and duty
Lead time; 32 days including transit time.
Quality: Very good. No test shots
"Lawrence L'Hote" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:5%8Pc.227330$Oq2.187760@attbi_s52...
>
> "John" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
> > China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> > English language.
>
> ..and to think we owe it all to Richard Milhous Nixon....
>
> Larry
>
>
>
Suuuuuure we do. That's funny.
Wayne
In article <[email protected]>, "J. Clarke" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Doug Miller wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>, "George" <george@least> wrote:
>>>I'm old enough to remember when "Made in Germany" and "Made in Japan"
>>>meant second-rate goods, not just Taiwan and China.
>>>
>> Japan, sure, but when did "Made in Germany" _ever_ mean second-rate?
>
>Maybe back when they and the Romans were going at it?
>
Doubtful -- the Germans won that one.
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter
by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com
You must use your REAL email address to get a response.
Swingman wrote:
<snip>
> And while we are on the subject, what is also amazing, at
> least to those of us old enough to note the difference between
> then and now, is the terminology used by corporations to
> foster the impression that they give a shit, like "customer
> care" and "customer service" ... if there are any words more
> contradictory in today's lexicon, I've yet to see them,
> particularly if a telephone is involved.
> Because of lack of perspective, relatively young consumers
> have NO earthly idea just how much more MORONIC the average
> employee, responsible for interface with the customer, is
> these days.
You aren't alone! My shop (shipping address) is more than fifteen
miles away from my home (billing address). Last week a young lad
struggled to carry a shipment of six-foot aluminum and brass bars
up the stairs to my third-floor condo.
The next morning, of course, I got to carry the whole lot back
down the stairs, load the works into my 2-door coupe, drive it
all to the shop, unload it, and carry it all to the storage area.
I had called the "customer service" department right before
ordering online to ensure that there wouldn't be any glitches...
The invoice did show the correct addresses. )-:
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto, Iowa USA
Eric Tonks wrote:
> It won't be long before the US military has to order it's battleships from
> Tiawan and it's missles from mainland China because there are no skilled
> workers nor competent factories that can make them.
If the Taiwanese or the mainland Chinese can make better weapons than we can
we're fucked anyway.
However there are laws about that sort of thing.
> "Mark L." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> How about the US congressman who found out that berets for one branch of
>> the Service (IIRC Army Rangers???) were MIC (Made In China). How far?
>> What about American flags? Yup, seen them. And I also saw some hand
>> stamps that are made to stamp "Made in America" that were manufactured
>> in Taiwan.... Welcome to the 'Global Economy'. (Hate that phrase)
>> Mark L.
>>
>> John wrote:
>>
>> > How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made
>> > in China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
>> > English language.
>> >
>>
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Doug Miller wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, "George" <george@least> wrote:
>>I'm old enough to remember when "Made in Germany" and "Made in Japan"
>>meant second-rate goods, not just Taiwan and China.
>>
> Japan, sure, but when did "Made in Germany" _ever_ mean second-rate?
Maybe back when they and the Romans were going at it?
> --
> Regards,
> Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
>
> Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter
> by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com
> You must use your REAL email address to get a response.
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Doug Miller wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, "J. Clarke"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Doug Miller wrote:
>>
>>> In article <[email protected]>, "George" <george@least>
>>> wrote:
>>>>I'm old enough to remember when "Made in Germany" and "Made in Japan"
>>>>meant second-rate goods, not just Taiwan and China.
>>>>
>>> Japan, sure, but when did "Made in Germany" _ever_ mean second-rate?
>>
>>Maybe back when they and the Romans were going at it?
>>
> Doubtful -- the Germans won that one.
But not necessarily on the basis of their manufactured goods.
> --
> Regards,
> Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
>
> Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter
> by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com
> You must use your REAL email address to get a response.
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 14:59:15 GMT, [email protected] (Doug Miller)
wrote:
>Japan, sure, but when did "Made in Germany" _ever_ mean second-rate?
Did you ever see _East_ German imports in the USA, or were they
excluded by some McCarthyist hangover ? There were some pretty rough
things made there in the last decades.
The way to spot a really old guy in a UK engineering workshop (if you
can still find one of _them_) is to ask if they think US hand tools
are something worth having.
Andy Dingley asks:
>
>>Japan, sure, but when did "Made in Germany" _ever_ mean second-rate?
>
>Did you ever see _East_ German imports in the USA, or were they
>excluded by some McCarthyist hangover ? There were some pretty rough
>things made there in the last decades.
Mostly condemned to the same limbo as Cuban items and culture...people could
come, but leave the manufactured things home.
Charlie Self
"Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
"jo4hn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> NoOne N Particular wrote:
>
> > "Lawrence L'Hote" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:5%8Pc.227330$Oq2.187760@attbi_s52...
> >
> >>"John" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >>>How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made
in
> >>>China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> >>>English language.
> >>
> >>..and to think we owe it all to Richard Milhous Nixon....
> >>
> >>Larry
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Suuuuuure we do. That's funny.
> >
> > Wayne
>
> That was one of the signature accomplishments of the Nixon
> administration. He was instrumental in renewing political and trade
> relations with the People's Republic of China.
> mahalo,
> jo4hn
>
True that he unlocked the door. His goal was to have a new market for us to
sell our goods. He isn't the one that started the industrialization of
China and all of the transfer of technology that has taken place.
Wayne
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:21:39 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
>Sorry, these widgets are now sold ONLY in packages, and there are only THREE
>widgets in a package. You are forced to buy two f*&^&^45 packages to get
>four. (This is fresh in my mind because it happened to me yesterday at Home
>Depot with eyebolts/screws)
That's because you'll need SIX of the items. One will break during
installation, and one will be defective.
These folks are actually looking out for you!
Barry
How true. I'm a tool and die maker who has been in the trade for 25
years and now I'm seeing 9 out of 10 toolmakers I know retraining for a
different career path. Most dies and molds are built and run in China.
Eric Tonks wrote:
> It won't be long before the US military has to order it's battleships from
> Tiawan and it's missles from mainland China because there are no skilled
> workers nor competent factories that can make them.
>>>
>>
>
>
"John" wrote in message
> How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
> China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> English language.
It's not so much where it is made, but the sly, diabolical, cheap ass
marketing tricks American corporations are using to screw the consumer.
Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
Sorry, these widgets are now sold ONLY in packages, and there are only THREE
widgets in a package. You are forced to buy two f*&^&^45 packages to get
four. (This is fresh in my mind because it happened to me yesterday at Home
Depot with eyebolts/screws)
The two hardware stores closest to me, who would have had these same widgets
loose in a bin, much better made and cheaper in the outcome because you
bought only what you needed, are now out of business.
And while we are on the subject, what is also amazing, at least to those of
us old enough to note the difference between then and now, is the
terminology used by corporations to foster the impression that they give a
shit, like "customer care" and "customer service" ... if there are any words
more contradictory in today's lexicon, I've yet to see them, particularly if
a telephone is involved.
Because of lack of perspective, relatively young consumers have NO earthly
idea just how much more MORONIC the average employee, responsible for
interface with the customer, is these days.
</rant>
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 7/10/04
Swingman states:
>And while we are on the subject, what is also amazing, at least to those of
>us old enough to note the difference between then and now, is the
>terminology used by corporations to foster the impression that they give a
>shit, like "customer care" and "customer service" ... if there are any words
>more contradictory in today's lexicon, I've yet to see them, particularly if
>a telephone is involved.
>
>Because of lack of perspective, relatively young consumers have NO earthly
>idea just how much more MORONIC the average employee, responsible for
>interface with the customer, is these days.
Bet your bippy. My wife is looking for a job right now. There are not more jobs
for clerks. They are all "customer service" types and all employees are now
"associates."
What horseshit. It's still minimum wage, annual 2% raises (or none), no
bennies, no incentive whatsoever to do a decent job. Lacking incentive, no
sensible person applies for that kind of job, so the dipshits take over. Years
ago, my wife had a job with an office supply store. She was there when we got
married--that's where I met her, in fact. For four years after we were married,
her boss didn't give her a raise. No bennies, either. Reason: I was working and
making semi-decent money. Pfui. He was mildly puzzled when she quit to take
care of grandchildren for no pay.
Charlie Self
"Democracy is a process by which people are free to choose the man who will get
the blame." Laurence J. Peter
In article <pelPc.16216$Xn.11201@fed1read05>,
AArDvarK <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Rick, I keep seeing this term "BORG", what does it mean? Big Organization?
>Alex
>
>
Weak pun on the like-named aliens from "Star Trek: The Next Generation",
who inhabit large box-shaped vessels, and take-over anything within reach
"Resistance is futile -- prepare to be assimilated."
Acronym for <B>ig <O>range <R>etail <G>iant.
Any of the so-called super-stores. As well as specifically the Orange-
colored home-improvement one.
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:57:13 +0000, Eugene <[email protected]> wrote:
>Greg wrote:
>
>>>Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
>>
>> The BORG is not a hardware store. Go to Ace. They will sell you one screw
>> or a box of screws. By the box they are pretty cheap.
>Ace always has a better selection, however the ACE near me always has a
>bunch of boxes of screws almost empty and half of the screws left in that
>box don't match the label and they almost never have the hole boxes.
Man, and all this time, I've been using drill bits for the holes. :-)
> Maybe
>its just the old 'hood that I live in, I haven't driven to any other yet.
>I have been buying some plastic storage boxes and am going to build a nice
>box to hold them all then start buying screws/bolts by the box from
>internet suppliers.
Sorry, no matter what quantity you have on hand, or is available in a
package, it will be two (too) short of your requirement.
"Greg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
>
> The BORG is not a hardware store. Go to Ace. They will sell you one screw
or a
> box of screws. By the box they are pretty cheap.
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 06:57:13 -0600, Eugene wrote
(in article <[email protected]>):
> Greg wrote:
> Ace always has a better selection, however the ACE near me always has a
> bunch of boxes of screws almost empty and half of the screws left in that
> box don't match the label and they almost never have the hole boxes. Maybe
> its just the old 'hood that I live in, I haven't driven to any other yet.
> I have been buying some plastic storage boxes and am going to build a nice
> box to hold them all then start buying screws/bolts by the box from
> internet suppliers.
>
Same here! Another problem is the box of screws (the cheap ones) usually are
hecho in China....
-Bruce
"Leon" wrote in message
> Hey Swingman, you are close to Bearings Hardware... LOL.. You can get a
> Cappuccino and a flower arrangement to go with your purchase.
On that same subject, were you aware that there is a Rockler
Woodworking/Hardware store on the N bound feeder street of SW FWY between
Buffalo Speedway and Kirby?
Took my youngest to lunch today and had to park away off from target
restaurant in the same strip ... ended up walking past a shop with Jet
woodworking tools in the front window?? ... for a second there I thought I
was in the wrong time warp.
Had no idea a Rockler existed less than 2 miles from my house ... said they
had been there since December. Lordy, I can feel the crowbar prying away
already.
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 7/10/04
SNIP
. Years
> ago, my wife had a job with an office supply store. She was there when we got
> married--that's where I met her, in fact. For four years after we were married,
> her boss didn't give her a raise. No bennies, either. Reason: I was working and
> making semi-decent money. Pfui. He was mildly puzzled when she quit to take
> care of grandchildren for no pay.
>
> Charlie Self
My mom worked as a secretary for the steelworkers union before she
married my dad. (Back in the good old days). When she got married the
union promptly fired her because her "husband should now take care of
her". I really do not think today is worse - and that was a union's
attitude.
Dave Hall
Dave Hall responds:
>. Years
>> ago, my wife had a job with an office supply store. She was there when we
>got
>> married--that's where I met her, in fact. For four years after we were
>married,
>> her boss didn't give her a raise. No bennies, either. Reason: I was working
>and
>> making semi-decent money. Pfui. He was mildly puzzled when she quit to take
>> care of grandchildren for no pay.
>>
>> Charlie Self
>
>My mom worked as a secretary for the steelworkers union before she
>married my dad. (Back in the good old days). When she got married the
>union promptly fired her because her "husband should now take care of
>her". I really do not think today is worse - and that was a union's
>attitude
Yeah. There is improvement. My first MIL was a physicist who ended up raising
kids and teaching high school. For several years, she got no raise. When she
raised a ruckus--this is in the early '50s, mind, she was told she didn't need
the money because her husband had a good job.
Total irrelevancies ruled. Some still do.
Charlie Self
"Democracy is a process by which people are free to choose the man who will get
the blame." Laurence J. Peter
Not sure. Union says they want everyone to make a "living wage." or what's
higher, and built into government contracts, "prevailing wage." Now does
any family deserve two such wages while any one has none?
Hint, nepotism is rampant in the union halls.
"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dave Hall responds:
> >
> >My mom worked as a secretary for the steelworkers union before she
> >married my dad. (Back in the good old days). When she got married the
> >union promptly fired her because her "husband should now take care of
> >her". I really do not think today is worse - and that was a union's
> >attitude
>
> Yeah. There is improvement. My first MIL was a physicist who ended up
raising
> kids and teaching high school. For several years, she got no raise. When
she
> raised a ruckus--this is in the early '50s, mind, she was told she didn't
need
> the money because her husband had a good job.
>
> Total irrelevancies ruled. Some still do.
>
George responds:
>Not sure. Union says they want everyone to make a "living wage." or what's
>higher, and built into government contracts, "prevailing wage." Now does
>any family deserve two such wages while any one has none?
>
>Hint, nepotism is rampant in the union halls.
>
>"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Dave Hall responds:
>> >
>> >My mom worked as a secretary for the steelworkers union before she
>> >married my dad. (Back in the good old days). When she got married the
>> >union promptly fired her because her "husband should now take care of
>> >her". I really do not think today is worse - and that was a union's
>> >attitude
>>
>> Yeah. There is improvement. My first MIL was a physicist who ended up
>raising
>> kids and teaching high school. For several years, she got no raise. When
>she
>> raised a ruckus--this is in the early '50s, mind, she was told she didn't
>need
>> the money because her husband had a good job.
>>
>> Total irrelevancies ruled. Some still do.
I dunno. Maybe one of those families without a living wage should pop up a
person who can teach physics while raising kids and writing several textbooks.
If you do the job, you should get the pay, regardless. If you're wealthy enough
to give all or some back, then that is your decision to do make, not your
employer's. It does not seem they're hiring others for the job, just
underpaying those they do hire for reasons that have no relevancy to the job or
the quality of work done.
When I was starting out, my first wife made considerably more money than I did.
If a magazine editor had suggested paying me a lower fee because she made
enough money to support us, I'd have pulled my article and sold it elsewhere.
Charlie Self
"Democracy is a process by which people are free to choose the man who will get
the blame." Laurence J. Peter
Careful. Next you'll be saying the "rich" have a right to their earnings
rather than an obligation to return them to society!
"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> If you do the job, you should get the pay, regardless. If you're wealthy
enough
> to give all or some back, then that is your decision to do make, not your
> employer's. It does not seem they're hiring others for the job, just
> underpaying those they do hire for reasons that have no relevancy to the
job or
> the quality of work done.
George responds:
>
>Careful. Next you'll be saying the "rich" have a right to their earnings
>rather than an obligation to return them to society!
>
>"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> If you do the job, you should get the pay, regardless. If you're wealthy
>enough
>> to give all or some back, then that is your decision to do make, not your
>> employer's. It does not seem they're hiring others for the job, just
>> underpaying those they do hire for reasons that have no relevancy to the
>job or
>> the quality of work done.
Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
Too often, the rich want you to work for zip, for the privilige of kissing the
hems of their money bags.
Charlie Self
"Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
"J. Clarke" <[email protected]> writes:
>Charlie Self wrote:
>> Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
>
>So what happened to "from each according to his ability, to each according
>to his needs"?
That idea has been relegated to the dustbin of history since, oh, about 1991
or so.
scott
Scott Lurndal responds:
>"J. Clarke" <[email protected]> writes:
>>Charlie Self wrote:
>
>>> Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
>>
>>So what happened to "from each according to his ability, to each according
>>to his needs"?
>
>That idea has been relegated to the dustbin of history since, oh, about 1991
>or so.
And it also is not a liberal idea. It is socialist, and the neocons have done a
better than fair job of confusing themselves about the differences.
Charlie Self
"Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
Charlie Self wrote:
> Scott Lurndal responds:
>
>>"J. Clarke" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>Charlie Self wrote:
>>
>>>> Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
>>>
>>>So what happened to "from each according to his ability, to each
>>>according to his needs"?
>>
>>That idea has been relegated to the dustbin of history since, oh, about
>>1991 or so.
>
> And it also is not a liberal idea. It is socialist, and the neocons have
> done a better than fair job of confusing themselves about the differences.
I see. So liberalism has repudiated socialism? When did that happen?
> Charlie Self
> "Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep
> the clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
On 02 Aug 2004 23:47:45 GMT, [email protected] (Charlie Self)
wrote:
>Scott Lurndal responds:
>
>>"J. Clarke" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>Charlie Self wrote:
>>
>>>> Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
>>>
>>>So what happened to "from each according to his ability, to each according
>>>to his needs"?
>>
>>That idea has been relegated to the dustbin of history since, oh, about 1991
>>or so.
>
>And it also is not a liberal idea. It is socialist, and the neocons have done a
>better than fair job of confusing themselves about the differences.
I would say that the "progressive" wing of a certain party has done an
even better job of associating its policies and rhetoric with those ideas.
Your so-called "neo-cons" are simply pointing out that fact.
>Charlie Self
>"Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
>clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
Yeah, sure. And the party decides what the job is worth?
Sorry.
"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
>
> Too often, the rich want you to work for zip, for the privilige of kissing
the
> hems of their money bags.
>
George states in response:
>Yeah, sure. And the party decides what the job is worth?
>
>Sorry.
>
>"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
>>
>> Too often, the rich want you to work for zip, for the privilige of kissing
>the
>> hems of their money bags.
>>
Where did you read that? Not in anything I wrote. The job market decides the
wage, as it should, but getting equal pay for equal work is sensible,
regardless of who, or what, determines the wage. To me, if a woman can do the
work, it is senseless to pay her less because she's married, but that has been,
and still sometimes is, a reasonably consistent policy of employers since the
Industrial Age began.
Are you saying that because someone has another wage earner in the house, they
should get less than the single person for doing exactly the same work at the
same level and doing it just as well?
Charlie Self
"Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
Charlie Self wrote:
>
> George states in response:
>
> >Yeah, sure. And the party decides what the job is worth?
> >
> >Sorry.
> >
> >"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >> Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
> >>
> >> Too often, the rich want you to work for zip, for the privilige of kissing
> >the
> >> hems of their money bags.
> >>
>
> Where did you read that? Not in anything I wrote. The job market decides the
> wage, as it should, but getting equal pay for equal work is sensible,
> regardless of who, or what, determines the wage. To me, if a woman can do the
> work, it is senseless to pay her less because she's married, but that has been,
> and still sometimes is, a reasonably consistent policy of employers since the
> Industrial Age began.
>
> Are you saying that because someone has another wage earner in the house, they
> should get less than the single person for doing exactly the same work at the
> same level and doing it just as well?
>
> Charlie Self
> "Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
> clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
Equal pay for equal work was never part of the Industrial age. One
standard even upto the 1950's and still espoused by many is pay based
on need. Statements such as, "That man needs a good paying job to
support his family, so Miss go somewhere else to find a job or GET
MARRIED" were common especially in any union workshop. The same
applied to kids who often did more work that the adults.
Pay was often based on race, sex, age, education, appearance, religion
and other factors unrelated to the actual amount of quality of work
done. Equal pay for equal work may be a goal, but even now it is not
universal even in highly industrialized nations.
George Cawthorn responds:
>Equal pay for equal work was never part of the Industrial age. One
>standard even upto the 1950's and still espoused by many is pay based
>on need. Statements such as, "That man needs a good paying job to
>support his family, so Miss go somewhere else to find a job or GET
>MARRIED" were common especially in any union workshop. The same
>applied to kids who often did more work that the adults.
Reminds me of my first days in a machine shop, back in '57.
I know that equal pay doesn't exist. It is said to, and in some jobs, it is
required, but...
>Pay was often based on race, sex, age, education, appearance, religion
>and other factors unrelated to the actual amount of quality of work
>done. Equal pay for equal work may be a goal, but even now it is not
>universal even in highly industrialized nations.
Unfortunately. And we get some strange results when laws substitute for sense
in the marketplace, with incompetents protected because they are the only ones
in a category getting equal pay, thus serve as shining examples of a company's
attention to fairness in employment.
Charlie Self
"Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
Why, it's word for word what you wrote, Charlie. I used it to point out
that what the job is worth, is an arbitrary decision taken by the government
in socialist states, the party in communist, or the unions in closed shops,
and does not necessarily equate to what the laborer is worth. It is a straw
woman to bring the "equivalent wage" and feminist rhetoric into the
discussion.
The laborer has a skill set which s/he brings to the workplace. If the set
is complicated, _and_ rare in the population, it is sound economics to
compensate them at a higher rate of pay. If they move to another "job" in
the same firm, are you saying they should be compensated differently?
Economics would agree, but try to impose a pay cut, or even a pay freeze and
see what happens.
More important than the skill set, which is sometimes learned on the job
itself, is the work ethic of the individual, yet this often cannot be
rewarded, paradoxically, because it is against the law. If , for example,
30 sick days a year are allowed, there are those who assume that these days
are their right, not a privilege. They cost the enterprise a good deal more
than others doing the same job. If a twenty minute break three times a day
is authorized, there are those who take twenty minutes of transit time to
get to the lunchroom rather than carry their thermos (used to frost me), or
walk off based on the clock, not on the task. They cost the enterprise in
the loss of their time, and often the loss of productivity in others.
So, it's not what the "job" is worth, but what the _individual_ is worth
which counts. A company progresses by figuring this out, while to a union,
it is anathema.
Obviously I was mocking the idea that everyone needs a "living wage" in
Marxist terms. I thought even you would realize that. It's basic leftie
dogma that no one needs more than some arbitrary "living" amount, therefore,
they should return their ill-gotten gains to the state for redistribution.
"From each ...."
"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> George states in response:
>
> >Yeah, sure. And the party decides what the job is worth?
> >
> >Sorry.
> >
> >"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >> Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
> >>
> Where did you read that? Not in anything I wrote. The job market decides
the
> wage, as it should, but getting equal pay for equal work is sensible,
> regardless of who, or what, determines the wage. To me, if a woman can do
the
> work, it is senseless to pay her less because she's married, but that has
been,
> and still sometimes is, a reasonably consistent policy of employers since
the
> Industrial Age began.
>
> Are you saying that because someone has another wage earner in the house,
they
> should get less than the single person for doing exactly the same work at
the
> same level and doing it just as well?
>
George responds:
>Why, it's word for word what you wrote, Charlie. I used it to point out
>that what the job is worth, is an arbitrary decision taken by the government
>in socialist states, the party in communist, or the unions in closed shops,
>and does not necessarily equate to what the laborer is worth. It is a straw
>woman to bring the "equivalent wage" and feminist rhetoric into the
>discussion.
Bullshit. I never used the word "party" and, though I know it roughens your
intellectual picture of yourself, what YOU point out is NOT what I say.
You'd have had a blast working for the railroads in the '90s--the 1890s.
Charlie Self
"Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
Charlie Self wrote:
> George responds:
>
>>
>>Careful. Next you'll be saying the "rich" have a right to their earnings
>>rather than an obligation to return them to society!
>>
>>"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> If you do the job, you should get the pay, regardless. If you're wealthy
>>enough
>>> to give all or some back, then that is your decision to do make, not
>>> your employer's. It does not seem they're hiring others for the job,
>>> just underpaying those they do hire for reasons that have no relevancy
>>> to the
>>job or
>>> the quality of work done.
>
> Sorry, George, but getting paid what a job is worth is a liberal idea.
So what happened to "from each according to his ability, to each according
to his needs"?
> Too often, the rich want you to work for zip, for the privilige of kissing
> the hems of their money bags.
>
> Charlie Self
> "Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep
> the clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
> Yeah. There is improvement. My first MIL was a physicist who ended up raising
> kids and teaching high school. For several years, she got no raise. When she
> raised a ruckus--this is in the early '50s, mind, she was told she didn't need
> the money because her husband had a good job.
> Total irrelevancies ruled. Some still do.
Charlie a LOT of that went on was also based on the petty envy of men, as in
"she's no longer available so we'll hire another single gal". These days it's not
as bad.
Alex
"Leon" wrote in message
> Hey Swingman, you are close to Bearings Hardware... LOL.. You can get a
> Cappuccino and a flower arrangement to go with your purchase.
... and pay a dollar each for an .08 cent part for the privilege. That said,
Bering's does have good help who know their areas, BUT, if you're male it's
required that you wear Italian tassel loafers with no socks to get waited
on.
Besides, I wouldn't want to take the chance that any woodworking friends
would see me go in there.
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 7/10/04
"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> For four years after we were married,
> her boss didn't give her a raise. No bennies, either. Reason: I was
working and
> making semi-decent money. Pfui. He was mildly puzzled when she quit to
take
> care of grandchildren for no pay.
>
> Charlie Self
If she was not already employed there, she may not have been hired since
she'd only get pregnant and stay home with the baby. It was a common reason
back then, not to hire women.
Ed Pawlowski writes:
>"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> For four years after we were married,
>> her boss didn't give her a raise. No bennies, either. Reason: I was
>working and
>> making semi-decent money. Pfui. He was mildly puzzled when she quit to
>take
>> care of grandchildren for no pay.
>>
>> Charlie Self
>
>If she was not already employed there, she may not have been hired since
>she'd only get pregnant and stay home with the baby. It was a common reason
>back then, not to hire women
Uh, no. Not much chance. We've only been married 17 years.
Charlie Self
"Democracy is a process by which people are free to choose the man who will get
the blame." Laurence J. Peter
Still is but they have made it illegal to say that anymore.
"Edwin Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:JM9Pc.3818
>
> If she was not already employed there, she may not have been hired since
> she'd only get pregnant and stay home with the baby. It was a common
reason
> back then, not to hire women.
>
>
In article <[email protected]>, Chris Dubea <[email protected]> wrote:
>I would much rather deal with the professionals, but unfortunately I
>have a day job and generally don't have that opportunity. I have
>switched to a position where we do the 9-80 thing and then get off
>every other friday. I will go to Ace on Friday, but NEVER on the
>weekends.
I used to work at a place that had that schedule. Ain't it great? A three-day
weekend every other week!
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter
by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com
You must use your REAL email address to get a response.
Hey Swingman, you are close to Bearings Hardware... LOL.. You can get a
Cappuccino and a flower arrangement to go with your purchase.
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Greg" wrote in message
> > >Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
> >
> > The BORG is not a hardware store. Go to Ace. They will sell you one
screw
> or a
> > box of screws. By the box they are pretty cheap.
>
> The closest Ace was one of the mentioned "hardware" stores that went out
of
> business.
>
> --
> www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 7/10/04
>
>
>
"Greg" wrote in message
> >Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
>
> The BORG is not a hardware store. Go to Ace. They will sell you one screw
or a
> box of screws. By the box they are pretty cheap.
The closest Ace was one of the mentioned "hardware" stores that went out of
business.
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 7/10/04
Greg wrote:
>>Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
>
> The BORG is not a hardware store. Go to Ace. They will sell you one screw
> or a box of screws. By the box they are pretty cheap.
Ace always has a better selection, however the ACE near me always has a
bunch of boxes of screws almost empty and half of the screws left in that
box don't match the label and they almost never have the hole boxes. Maybe
its just the old 'hood that I live in, I haven't driven to any other yet.
I have been buying some plastic storage boxes and am going to build a nice
box to hold them all then start buying screws/bolts by the box from
internet suppliers.
Mark & Juanita wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:06:46 +0000, Eugene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Bruce wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 06:57:13 -0600, Eugene wrote
>>> (in article <[email protected]>):
>>>
>>>> Greg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ace always has a better selection, however the ACE near me always has a
>>>> bunch of boxes of screws almost empty and half of the screws left in
>>>> that box don't match the label and they almost never have the hole
>>>> boxes. Maybe its just the old 'hood that I live in, I haven't driven to
>>>> any other yet. I have been buying some plastic storage boxes and am
>>>> going to build a nice box to hold them all then start buying
>>>> screws/bolts by the box from internet suppliers.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Same here! Another problem is the box of screws (the cheap ones) usually
>>> are hecho in China....
>>>
>>>
>>> -Bruce
>>I love when you try to screw those china made screws in and they strip out
>>or break even with a pilot hole for them.
>
>
> I've just plain stopped buying screws from any of the Borgs (orange or
> blue) and have even thrown away the screws I had from them. I spent too
> much time dealing with broken screws when using them. McFeeleys is IMHO
> the way to go -- mail order a bunch of various sizes and keep them on
> hand. I have twisted off some McFeeleys screws, but when I have done so,
> it has
> been my fault by setting the torque too high. The chinese screws from the
> Borgs have twisted off for me at even the lowest settings.
I've started ordering ones like stainless steel for all jigs and new router
table as the polishedness seems to wear less on the threads.
Your Ace went out of biz?? I live in a small
town,(6000) a BORG moved in about 18 mo. ago.
One lumber yard closed, the other is still going
strong(?) But Ace is going all out. went there
yesterday, needed some "o" rings to rebuild a
kitchen. Had already been to HD, (closer), and
they didn't have both sizes. The guy at Ace took
about 3 seconds to find a pack w/ both sizes. He
knew the manufacturer, and such. Customer service
isn't dead yet!!
Swingman wrote:
> "Greg" wrote in message
>
>>>Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
>>
>>The BORG is not a hardware store. Go to Ace. They will sell you one screw
>
> or a
>
>>box of screws. By the box they are pretty cheap.
>
>
> The closest Ace was one of the mentioned "hardware" stores that went out of
> business.
>
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:06:46 +0000, Eugene <[email protected]> wrote:
>Bruce wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 06:57:13 -0600, Eugene wrote
>> (in article <[email protected]>):
>>
>>> Greg wrote:
>>
>>> Ace always has a better selection, however the ACE near me always has a
>>> bunch of boxes of screws almost empty and half of the screws left in that
>>> box don't match the label and they almost never have the hole boxes.
>>> Maybe its just the old 'hood that I live in, I haven't driven to any
>>> other yet. I have been buying some plastic storage boxes and am going to
>>> build a nice box to hold them all then start buying screws/bolts by the
>>> box from internet suppliers.
>>>
>>
>> Same here! Another problem is the box of screws (the cheap ones) usually
>> are hecho in China....
>>
>>
>> -Bruce
>I love when you try to screw those china made screws in and they strip out
>or break even with a pilot hole for them.
I've just plain stopped buying screws from any of the Borgs (orange or
blue) and have even thrown away the screws I had from them. I spent too
much time dealing with broken screws when using them. McFeeleys is IMHO
the way to go -- mail order a bunch of various sizes and keep them on hand.
I have twisted off some McFeeleys screws, but when I have done so, it has
been my fault by setting the torque too high. The chinese screws from the
Borgs have twisted off for me at even the lowest settings.
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:57:13 +0000, Eugene <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Greg wrote:
>
>>>Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
>>
>> The BORG is not a hardware store. Go to Ace. They will sell you one screw
>> or a box of screws. By the box they are pretty cheap.
>Ace always has a better selection, however the ACE near me always has a
>bunch of boxes of screws almost empty and half of the screws left in that
>box don't match the label and they almost never have the hole boxes. Maybe
>its just the old 'hood that I live in, I haven't driven to any other yet.
>I have been buying some plastic storage boxes and am going to build a nice
>box to hold them all then start buying screws/bolts by the box from
>internet suppliers.
The large Ace where I live is two different stores. The store on
weekdays, where they employ professionals who wait on professionals
and on weekends where they employ smart mouthed teenagers to wait on
the DIY'er. It's this type of service that makes the DIY'er go to the
Borg.
I would much rather deal with the professionals, but unfortunately I
have a day job and generally don't have that opportunity. I have
switched to a position where we do the 9-80 thing and then get off
every other friday. I will go to Ace on Friday, but NEVER on the
weekends.
===========================================================================
Chris
> Weak pun on the like-named aliens from "Star Trek: The Next Generation",
> who inhabit large box-shaped vessels, and take-over anything within reach
> "Resistance is futile -- prepare to be assimilated."
> Acronym for <B>ig <O>range <R>etail <G>iant.
> Any of the so-called super-stores. As well as specifically the Orange-
> colored home-improvement one.
>
Yeah we got us a damn HD and OSH =BORG, very poor with hand tools like
classic ones. Some sweet hardware stores went out of biz because of them.
"Learned Hardware ... come back - come back!"
Alex
AArDvarK responds:
>Yeah we got us a damn HD and OSH =BORG, very poor with hand tools like
>classic ones. Some sweet hardware stores went out of biz because of them.
>
>"Learned Hardware ... come back - come back!"
Actually, they went out of business because their customers bailed out to save
a few cents on the dollar.
Why would they come back to take another fiscal beating?
Charlie Self
"Give me golf clubs, fresh air and a beautiful partner, and you can keep the
clubs and the fresh air." Jack Benny
Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 06:57:13 -0600, Eugene wrote
> (in article <[email protected]>):
>
>> Greg wrote:
>
>> Ace always has a better selection, however the ACE near me always has a
>> bunch of boxes of screws almost empty and half of the screws left in that
>> box don't match the label and they almost never have the hole boxes.
>> Maybe its just the old 'hood that I live in, I haven't driven to any
>> other yet. I have been buying some plastic storage boxes and am going to
>> build a nice box to hold them all then start buying screws/bolts by the
>> box from internet suppliers.
>>
>
> Same here! Another problem is the box of screws (the cheap ones) usually
> are hecho in China....
>
>
> -Bruce
I love when you try to screw those china made screws in and they strip out
or break even with a pilot hole for them.
Mark & Juanita wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:57:13 +0000, Eugene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Greg wrote:
>>
>>>>Case in point: Go to the BORG, any BORG, to buy four hardware widgets.
>>>
>>> The BORG is not a hardware store. Go to Ace. They will sell you one
>>> screw or a box of screws. By the box they are pretty cheap.
>>Ace always has a better selection, however the ACE near me always has a
>>bunch of boxes of screws almost empty and half of the screws left in that
>>box don't match the label and they almost never have the hole boxes.
>
> Man, and all this time, I've been using drill bits for the holes. :-)
>
>
oops, one the spell checker doesn't catch.
NoOne N Particular wrote:
> "Lawrence L'Hote" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:5%8Pc.227330$Oq2.187760@attbi_s52...
>
>>"John" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made in
>>>China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
>>>English language.
>>
>>..and to think we owe it all to Richard Milhous Nixon....
>>
>>Larry
>>
>>
>>
>
> Suuuuuure we do. That's funny.
>
> Wayne
That was one of the signature accomplishments of the Nixon
administration. He was instrumental in renewing political and trade
relations with the People's Republic of China.
mahalo,
jo4hn
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:13:58 -0400, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Methinks they define "customer service" as "service the customer"!
>
There may be one or two folks out there that are not familiar with the
stockman's use of the term "service". For those folks, it's what the bull dues
to the cow.
Tom Veatch
Wichita, KS USA
You are wrong about that. The ships will come from Hyundai Heavy
Industries in Korea.
Wayne
"Eric Tonks" <etonks@sunstormADD-DOT-COM> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> It won't be long before the US military has to order it's battleships from
> Tiawan and it's missles from mainland China because there are no skilled
> workers nor competent factories that can make them.
>
> "Mark L." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > How about the US congressman who found out that berets for one branch of
> > the Service (IIRC Army Rangers???) were MIC (Made In China). How far?
> > What about American flags? Yup, seen them. And I also saw some hand
> > stamps that are made to stamp "Made in America" that were manufactured
> > in Taiwan.... Welcome to the 'Global Economy'. (Hate that phrase)
> > Mark L.
> >
> > John wrote:
> >
> > > How far can it go? Bought some toothpicks last week. Toothpicks! Made
in
> > > China! "Made in China" will soon become the most used words in the
> > > English language.
> > >
> >
>
>
Methinks they define "customer service" as "service the customer"!
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:21:39 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>And while we are on the subject, what is also amazing, at least to those of
>us old enough to note the difference between then and now, is the
>terminology used by corporations to foster the impression that they give a
>shit, like "customer care" and "customer service" ... if there are any words
>more contradictory in today's lexicon, I've yet to see them, particularly if
>a telephone is involved.