[email protected] May 28, 1:40 pm wrote: Grain alcohol from the
look of it.
Would that be quarter sawn or plain sawn grain alcohol ? Tom
On Sun, 29 May 2005 05:58:34 -0500, Prometheus
<[email protected]> wrote:
>That'd be an odd comparison- rec.metalworking is almost a dead group,
>and this one is hopping every day. My vote is for alcohol fueled
>pseudo-rant.
I'll drink to that!
On Sun, 29 May 2005 01:59:24 +0100, LRod <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sat, 28 May 2005 22:56:47 +0800, Old Nick
><nsnsafemail#iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>>You guys arew basically worse than the rmw group
>
>So does anyone know what the rmw group is?
>
>Is it really the rm group but spelled the same way the OP spells
>"are"?
>
>Have we been insulted?
could be rec.music.white-power. if so, we have been called nazi
skinheads, and we have been thoroughly insulted. while there are some
racists here, I suspect that they are a minority. at least I hope so.
"Old Nick" <nsnsafemail#iinet.net.au> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> You guys arew basically worse than the rmw group
>
> So fuck you.
>
> Sorry.
Thank you for sharing your feelings. No reason to be sorry though, you are
just being expressive and it is good to let your emotions free.
BTW, what are you drinking?
The Old Nick ([email protected]) is ranting on many groups. Some of the
favorites are:
- rec.crafts.metalworking
- comp.graphics.apps.paint-shop-pro
- rec.boats.building
- sci.astro.amateur
I am wondering, what is the story behind his nick name - the fellow down
under in the hot place.
A quote from Odusseus in alt.myhtology says:
"One explanation that's been offered refers to the word _nicker_ or
_nicor_, from Northern European legend, for an aquatic monster
hostile to humanity -- perhaps similar to the Celtic _each uisge_.
OTOH the _OED_ says there's no evidence for such a connection, and
that the name is probably just the short form of Nicholas, applied to
the devil for some obscure reason. In this line I've seen Niccolo
Machiavelli, author of _The Prince_, suggested as the source of the
eponym, presumably from the amorality or 'the end justifies the
means' attitude of his treatise. The _OED_'s earliest citations are
from the mid-XVII century."
Cheers, Ollie
"LRod" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 22:56:47 +0800, Old Nick
> <nsnsafemail#iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>>You guys arew basically worse than the rmw group
>
> So does anyone know what the rmw group is?
>
> Is it really the rm group but spelled the same way the OP spells
> "are"?
>
> Have we been insulted?
>
> --
> LRod
>
> Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite
>
> Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999
>
> http://www.woodbutcher.net
>
> Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997
ROFLMAO!!!
"LRod" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 22:56:47 +0800, Old Nick
> <nsnsafemail#iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>>You guys arew basically worse than the rmw group
>
> So does anyone know what the rmw group is?
>
> Is it really the rm group but spelled the same way the OP spells
> "are"?
>
> Have we been insulted?
>
> --
> LRod
>
> Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite
>
> Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999
>
> http://www.woodbutcher.net
>
> Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997
Actually I think rift
"tom" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] May 28, 1:40 pm wrote: Grain alcohol from the
> look of it.
>
> Would that be quarter sawn or plain sawn grain alcohol ? Tom
>
If we've been insulted, at least he apologized in the same breath!
Dave
LRod wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 22:56:47 +0800, Old Nick
> <nsnsafemail#iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>
>>You guys arew basically worse than the rmw group
>
>
> So does anyone know what the rmw group is?
>
> Is it really the rm group but spelled the same way the OP spells
> "are"?
>
> Have we been insulted?
>
On Sun, 29 May 2005 19:36:13 -0700, Lee DeRaud <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Sun, 29 May 2005 18:40:13 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 29 May 2005 01:59:24 +0100, LRod <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 28 May 2005 22:56:47 +0800, Old Nick
>>><nsnsafemail#iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>>You guys arew basically worse than the rmw group
>>>
>>>So does anyone know what the rmw group is?
>>>
>>>Is it really the rm group but spelled the same way the OP spells
>>>"are"?
>>>
>>>Have we been insulted?
>>
>>could be rec.music.white-power. if so, we have been called nazi
>>skinheads, and we have been thoroughly insulted. while there are some
>>racists here, I suspect that they are a minority. at least I hope so.
>
>"Nazi"? No way, they wouldn't have me, even if I *wanted* to be a part
>of something that badly organized.
>
>"Skinhead"? Yeah I guess so, but I got mine the old-fashioned way:
>I grew it.
>
... or stopped growing it as the case may be. :-( i.e, me too
>Lee
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
On 28 May 2005 20:05:09 -0700, "tom" <[email protected]> wrote:
>LRod wrote: So does anyone know what the rmw group is?
>
>I'm betting he means rec.metalworking. We're not insulted. Wonder what
>he's so flustered about, though. Trolling, ya think?Tom
I doubt it.. Nick's not the trolling type...
something must have pissed him off...
mac
Please remove splinters before emailing
On Sat, 28 May 2005 22:56:47 +0800, Old Nick
<nsnsafemail#iinet.net.au> wrote:
>You guys arew basically worse than the rmw group
So does anyone know what the rmw group is?
Is it really the rm group but spelled the same way the OP spells
"are"?
Have we been insulted?
--
LRod
Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite
Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999
http://www.woodbutcher.net
Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997
On 28 May 2005 20:05:09 -0700, "tom" <[email protected]> wrote:
>LRod wrote: So does anyone know what the rmw group is?
>
>I'm betting he means rec.metalworking. We're not insulted. Wonder what
>he's so flustered about, though. Trolling, ya think?Tom
That'd be an odd comparison- rec.metalworking is almost a dead group,
and this one is hopping every day. My vote is for alcohol fueled
pseudo-rant.
On 28 May 2005 11:04:42 -0700, "tom" <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] May 28, 1:40 pm wrote: Grain alcohol from the
>look of it.
>
> Would that be quarter sawn or plain sawn grain alcohol ? Tom
might be see-saw, by now..
mac
Please remove splinters before emailing
On Sun, 29 May 2005 18:40:13 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>On Sun, 29 May 2005 01:59:24 +0100, LRod <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 28 May 2005 22:56:47 +0800, Old Nick
>><nsnsafemail#iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>>You guys arew basically worse than the rmw group
>>
>>So does anyone know what the rmw group is?
>>
>>Is it really the rm group but spelled the same way the OP spells
>>"are"?
>>
>>Have we been insulted?
>
>could be rec.music.white-power. if so, we have been called nazi
>skinheads, and we have been thoroughly insulted. while there are some
>racists here, I suspect that they are a minority. at least I hope so.
"Nazi"? No way, they wouldn't have me, even if I *wanted* to be a part
of something that badly organized.
"Skinhead"? Yeah I guess so, but I got mine the old-fashioned way:
I grew it.
Lee
On Tue, 31 May 2005 11:14:45 -0700, mac davis
<[email protected]> wrote:
>I doubt it.. Nick's not the trolling type...
>something must have pissed him off...
I think he sits down to pee.
Tom Watson - WoodDorker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/ (website)