CC

CNT

14/07/2005 9:16 PM

VOTE: 45-degree corners

http://members.toast.net/cnt/corner45.htm

How do you do yours?
OR
How would you do it if you came across to this?

I have been using plan B for long time. Then yesterday a friend told me
that his WW'ing company does plan A all the time. I would prefer plan A
(makes the raised panels even on both sides), but plan B would be stronger?
This is about using biscuits and glue.

Chuck


This topic has 12 replies

Uu

"Upscale"

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

14/07/2005 5:53 PM

"CNT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> (makes the raised panels even on both sides), but plan B would be
stronger?
> This is about using biscuits and glue.

Maybe it's me, but I fail to see the relationship between those mitred
corners and raised panels.

CC

CNT

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

14/07/2005 11:35 PM

It's 3/4" thick lumber, with one cut at 45-degree on both sides. Then glued
all together. This makes a "safer" corner rather a sharp pointing edge.

I am asking which would be stronger (obvious Plan A), but was told that one
company does Plan B, so just wondering.

Chuck

>>http://members.toast.net/cnt/corner45.htm
>>
> Maybe I'm missing something... but it's not at all clear to me what
> the illustrations represent, or what you're asking. Please explain
> further.

CC

CNT

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

14/07/2005 11:36 PM

The "un-mitred" lumber would be the raised panels. Otherwise, forget it.

Chuck

> Maybe it's me, but I fail to see the relationship between those mitred
> corners and raised panels.

CC

CNT

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

14/07/2005 11:44 PM

I meant I used Plan A all along. Not Plan B...

>> I have been using plan B for long time.

Obvious Plan A would be "stronger", but was told that one company does
Plan B, so just wondering.

As for using raised panels, I glue the RP onto the mitred cut, then sand
it. This will leave one side "2-1/2" and other "2-3/4" looks. I know I
could adjust the stiles to compensate... should I? Maybe not.

Hmm, in case you looking at this in a different way, I am looking at the
45-degree corners for the outside, while the inside would be hidden.

> Absolutely Plan A. With "A" you end up with the false corners that
> hide the actual joint. These can easily be put together with pocket
> hole screws if the inside will not show.

I still like using biscuits. I use pocket hole occasionally.

Chuck

CC

CNT

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

15/07/2005 9:29 PM

>>Plan C (22.5-degree cuts on each)

Why? I think it's OK idea, was there a reason for that? Pocket holes?

Chuck

ll

loutent

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

15/07/2005 8:26 PM

In article <[email protected]>, CNT <[email protected]>
wrote:

> http://members.toast.net/cnt/corner45.htm
>
> How do you do yours?
> OR
> How would you do it if you came across to this?
>
> I have been using plan B for long time. Then yesterday a friend told me
> that his WW'ing company does plan A all the time. I would prefer plan A
> (makes the raised panels even on both sides), but plan B would be stronger?
> This is about using biscuits and glue.
>
> Chuck

Hi Chuck,

I never thought of anything like plan "A" until I bought
a Kreg PS jig about 2 weeks ago. It made a lot of sense
to me for my current project where the back side is
not visible (as shown in their owners booklet).

One thing is certain. It requires cutting only one angle
at something other than 90, so if you're trying to fit some
trim, you are only working with one edge.

Don't think that it's perfect for every situation, but it's
a good solution in some.

Lou

BD

Bill Davis Jr

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

15/07/2005 5:04 PM

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:11:24 -0400, alexy <[email protected]> wrote:

>CNT <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>http://members.toast.net/cnt/corner45.htm
>>
>>How do you do yours?
>>OR
>>How would you do it if you came across to this?
>>
>>I have been using plan B for long time. Then yesterday a friend told me
>>that his WW'ing company does plan A all the time. I would prefer plan A
>>(makes the raised panels even on both sides), but plan B would be stronger?
>>This is about using biscuits and glue.
>>
>>Chuck
>
>Plan C (22.5-degree cuts on each)


Add my vote to that to.

Bill

Lr

"Leon"

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

14/07/2005 11:52 PM


"CNT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> I still like using biscuits. I use pocket hole occasionally.

With that kind of corner and joint the biscuits are OK but the pocket holes
pull the joint up tighter and more easily. It is often hard to clamp that
type corner joint .

Lr

"Leon"

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

14/07/2005 10:09 PM


"CNT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> http://members.toast.net/cnt/corner45.htm
>
> How do you do yours?
> OR
> How would you do it if you came across to this?
>
> I have been using plan B for long time. Then yesterday a friend told me
> that his WW'ing company does plan A all the time. I would prefer plan A
> (makes the raised panels even on both sides), but plan B would be
> stronger?
> This is about using biscuits and glue.
>
> Chuck

Absolutely Plan A. With "A" you end up with the false corners that hide the
actual joint. These can easily be put together with pocket hole screws if
the inside will not show.

an

alexy

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

15/07/2005 12:11 AM

CNT <[email protected]> wrote:

>http://members.toast.net/cnt/corner45.htm
>
>How do you do yours?
>OR
>How would you do it if you came across to this?
>
>I have been using plan B for long time. Then yesterday a friend told me
>that his WW'ing company does plan A all the time. I would prefer plan A
>(makes the raised panels even on both sides), but plan B would be stronger?
>This is about using biscuits and glue.
>
>Chuck

Plan C (22.5-degree cuts on each)
--
Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently.

Ob

Odinn

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

17/07/2005 9:41 AM

On 7/15/2005 12:11 AM alexy mumbled something about the following:
> CNT <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>http://members.toast.net/cnt/corner45.htm
>>
>>How do you do yours?
>>OR
>>How would you do it if you came across to this?
>>
>>I have been using plan B for long time. Then yesterday a friend told me
>>that his WW'ing company does plan A all the time. I would prefer plan A
>>(makes the raised panels even on both sides), but plan B would be stronger?
>>This is about using biscuits and glue.
>>
>>Chuck
>
>
> Plan C (22.5-degree cuts on each)

Definitely, neither A nor B seem even remotely correct.

--
Odinn
RCOS #7
SENS(less)
SLUG

"The more I study religions the more I am convinced that man never
worshipped anything but himself." -- Sir Richard Francis Burton

Reeky's unofficial homepage ... http://www.reeky.org
'03 FLHTI ........... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/ElectraGlide
'97 VN1500D ......... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/VulcanClassic
Atlanta Biker Net ... http://www.atlantabiker.net
Vulcan Riders Assoc . http://www.vulcanriders.org

rot13 [email protected] to reply

sD

[email protected] (Doug Miller)

in reply to CNT on 14/07/2005 9:16 PM

14/07/2005 9:24 PM

In article <[email protected]>, CNT <[email protected]> wrote:
>http://members.toast.net/cnt/corner45.htm
>
>How do you do yours?
>OR
>How would you do it if you came across to this?
>
>I have been using plan B for long time. Then yesterday a friend told me
>that his WW'ing company does plan A all the time. I would prefer plan A
>(makes the raised panels even on both sides), but plan B would be stronger?
>This is about using biscuits and glue.

Maybe I'm missing something... but it's not at all clear to me what the
illustrations represent, or what you're asking. Please explain further.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.


You’ve reached the end of replies