LH

"Lew Hodgett"

20/04/2010 11:36 PM

O/T: Throw Another Log On The Fire

One year ago the temp reached 100F.

Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.

A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
the Pacific.

The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
June.

So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."


Lew





This topic has 30 replies

kk

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 8:22 PM

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:18:25 -0700, Zz Yzx <[email protected]> wrote:

>>>OH YEAH BUDDY? I'll put my mind toe-to-toe to yours anytime!
>>
>>That's about where yours is; in your toe.
>>
>>>Wanna' meet out behind the particle accelerator building?
>>
>>I suppose your particles are about the right size for an accelerator.
>
>Ah, you've resorted to opportunistic, off-topic insults that don't
>warrant a reply.

Wow! There is a big PKB.

>ButDO warranet a PLONK.

>PLONK.

You really don't have any balls.

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

22/04/2010 7:20 AM

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:29:13 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
<[email protected]> scrawled the following:

>"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
>> Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>>
>>>"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>>>
>>>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>>>
>>>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
>>>>> the
>>>>> Pacific.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>>>> June.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lew
>>>>
>>>>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global
>>>>Warming?
>>>>;-)
>>>>
>>>
>>>If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the
>>>planet.
>>>
>>>As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since the
>>>CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in the
>>>atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like coal
>>>and oil.
>>
>> Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.
>
>Or rent a humor gene ...

I love these "carbon neutral" statements about the forms of heating
which put out up to 400 times the pollution/CO2 than other forms do.
Have you ever seen a quiet valley where there are a dozen home fires
going? It's inundated with smoke so your visibility is cut to the
next house, if you're close enough. I've driven through Merlin, OR
and wondered about the dense fog until I got past the ONE fireplace
which had smoked out the entire freakin' town! I drove through several
miles of it and could smell the smoke, but couldn't see any fireplaces
until then. Two of my neighbors have pellet stoves, and even they're
nasty when you're standing downwind of 'em. Uckfay Oodway Iresfay.

--
...in order that a man may be happy, it is necessary that he should
not only be capable of his work, but a good judge of his work.
-- John Ruskin

kk

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 10:32 PM

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:01:02 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On Apr 21, 9:22 pm, "[email protected]"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:18:25 -0700, Zz Yzx <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>OH YEAH BUDDY?  I'll put my mind toe-to-toe to yours anytime!
>>
>> >>That's about where yours is; in your toe.
>>
>> >>>Wanna' meet out behind the particle accelerator building?
>>
>> >>I suppose your particles are about the right size for an accelerator.
>>
>> >Ah, you've resorted to opportunistic, off-topic insults that don't
>> >warrant a reply.
>>
>> Wow!  There is a big PKB.
>>
>> >ButDO warranet a PLONK.
>> >PLONK.
>>
>
>Oh dwat.. sumbuddy else doesn wuv you....

Doesn't surprise me that you'd stick up for the loser. Lefties of a
feather...

ZY

Zz Yzx

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 6:18 PM

>>OH YEAH BUDDY? I'll put my mind toe-to-toe to yours anytime!
>
>That's about where yours is; in your toe.
>
>>Wanna' meet out behind the particle accelerator building?
>
>I suppose your particles are about the right size for an accelerator.

Ah, you've resorted to opportunistic, off-topic insults that don't
warrant a reply.

ButDO warranet a PLONK.

PLONK.

-Zz

kk

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 8:03 PM

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:50:26 -0700, Zz Yzx <[email protected]> wrote:

>>Just can't get enough of that global warming... globaloney.
>
>So, lemme' get this straight......
>
>You go out in your yard and say "It's cold, global warming is
>globalony"......
>
>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100420225712.htm
>
>What part of "global" do you not understand? Your yard is your globe?

The same thing the members of the Church of Globalony understand when they
blame hurricanes on Globalony Warming. Except in this case it's done poking
fun at the members of the Church of Globalony.

>Small minds think alike.

Seems you do.

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

22/04/2010 9:31 PM

On 22 Apr 2010 15:37:16 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
Lurndal) scrawled the following:

>Larry Jaques <[email protected]> writes:
>>On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:29:13 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
>><[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>>
>>>"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>> On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
>>>> Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>>>>
>>>>>"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Pacific.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>>>>>> June.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lew
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global
>>>>>>Warming?
>>>>>>;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the
>>>>>planet.
>>>>>
>>>>>As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since the
>>>>>CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in the
>>>>>atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like coal
>>>>>and oil.
>>>>
>>>> Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.
>>>
>>>Or rent a humor gene ...
>>
>>I love these "carbon neutral" statements about the forms of heating
>>which put out up to 400 times the pollution/CO2 than other forms do.
>>Have you ever seen a quiet valley where there are a dozen home fires
>>going? It's inundated with smoke so your visibility is cut to the
>>next house, if you're close enough. I've driven through Merlin, OR
>>and wondered about the dense fog until I got past the ONE fireplace
>>which had smoked out the entire freakin' town! I drove through several
>>miles of it and could smell the smoke, but couldn't see any fireplaces
>>until then. Two of my neighbors have pellet stoves, and even they're
>>nasty when you're standing downwind of 'em. Uckfay Oodway Iresfay.
>>
>
>I stand by my statement that burning wood is carbon neutral. Look it up.

Of course you do, Scott. And you'd bet your Birkenstocks on it,
wouldn't you?

--
...in order that a man may be happy, it is necessary that he should
not only be capable of his work, but a good judge of his work.
-- John Ruskin

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 11:28 AM

On Apr 21, 1:28=A0pm, "ChairMan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Innews:7ccedc19-dab0-40a0-84b1-59cdcfc75e1e@j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com,
> Robatoy <[email protected]>spewed forth:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 21, 6:59 am, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> >> In article <[email protected]>, "Lew
> >> Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>
> >>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>
> >>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in
> >>> off the Pacific.
>
> >>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
> >>> June.
>
> >> Just can't get enough of that global warming... globaloney.
>
> >http://www.ipprospective.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/troll-web.jpg
>
> So, Lew is a troll now?
> Okay, whatever...........

Not Lew, silly....

ZY

Zz Yzx

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 6:09 PM

>>What part of "global" do you not understand? Your yard is your globe?
>
>The same thing the members of the Church of Globalony understand when they
>blame hurricanes on Globalony Warming. Except in this case it's done poking
>fun at the members of the Church of Globalony.
>
>>Small minds think alike.
>
>Seems you do.

OH YEAH BUDDY? I'll put my mind toe-to-toe to yours anytime! Wanna'
meet out behind the particle accelerator building?

-Zz

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 6:38 AM

On Apr 21, 9:37=A0am, Larry Jaques <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:42:24 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
> <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>
>
>
>
>
> >"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>
> >> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>
> >> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off =
the
> >> Pacific.
>
> >> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru Ju=
ne.
>
> >> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>
> >> Lew
>
> >Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global Warmin=
g?
> >;-)
>
> No. Liberals never do what they preach. Look at their preacher,
> Algore's, estate in Kentucky, which, after public shame and eco
> retrofit, still uses _20_times_ the energy a typical human's home
> requires. (He uses 221,000KWh while I used 5,000 last year, 44 times
> my requirement. Nat'l avg is 10,656KWh annually.) For them, it's "Do
> as I say, not as I do." =A0Hypocrites, all.
>
> --
> "I think you very well may see a revolution in this country and
> it will not be a revolution to overthrow the government," he said.
> "It would be a revolution to restore government to its constitutional
> basis." =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0--Rob Weaver on VoA, 4/19/10

http://www.ipprospective.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/troll-web.jpg

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

22/04/2010 9:32 PM

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:36:49 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
<[email protected]> scrawled the following:

>"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:29:13 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
>> <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>>
>>>"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>> On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
>>>> Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>>>>
>>>>>"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Pacific.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>>>>>> June.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lew
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global
>>>>>>Warming?
>>>>>>;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the
>>>>>planet.
>>>>>
>>>>>As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since the
>>>>>CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in the
>>>>>atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like
>>>>>coal
>>>>>and oil.
>>>>
>>>> Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.
>>>
>>>Or rent a humor gene ...
>>
>> I love these "carbon neutral" statements about the forms of heating
>> which put out up to 400 times the pollution/CO2 than other forms do.
>> Have you ever seen a quiet valley where there are a dozen home fires
>> going? It's inundated with smoke so your visibility is cut to the
>> next house, if you're close enough. I've driven through Merlin, OR
>> and wondered about the dense fog until I got past the ONE fireplace
>> which had smoked out the entire freakin' town! I drove through several
>> miles of it and could smell the smoke, but couldn't see any fireplaces
>> until then. Two of my neighbors have pellet stoves, and even they're
>> nasty when you're standing downwind of 'em. Uckfay Oodway Iresfay.
>
>You seen a grass burning?

Yeah, beautiful, isn't it?

--
...in order that a man may be happy, it is necessary that he should
not only be capable of his work, but a good judge of his work.
-- John Ruskin

ZY

Zz Yzx

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 5:50 PM

>Just can't get enough of that global warming... globaloney.

So, lemme' get this straight......

You go out in your yard and say "It's cold, global warming is
globalony"......

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100420225712.htm

What part of "global" do you not understand? Your yard is your globe?

Small minds think alike.

-Zz

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 11:13 PM

On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
Lurndal) scrawled the following:

>"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>
>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>
>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off the
>>> Pacific.
>>>
>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru June.
>>>
>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>
>>>
>>> Lew
>>
>>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global Warming?
>>;-)
>>
>
>If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the planet.
>
>As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since the
>CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in the
>atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like coal
>and oil.

Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.


--
"I think you very well may see a revolution in this country and
it will not be a revolution to overthrow the government," he said.
"It would be a revolution to restore government to its constitutional
basis." --Rob Weaver on VoA, 4/19/10

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 6:38 AM

On Apr 21, 6:59=A0am, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, "Lew Hodgett" <s=
[email protected]> wrote:
> >One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>
> >Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>
> >A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
> >the Pacific.
>
> >The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
> >June.
>
> Just can't get enough of that global warming... globaloney.

http://www.ipprospective.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/troll-web.jpg

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

22/04/2010 5:41 AM

On Apr 21, 11:32=A0pm, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:01:02 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy <[email protected]=
m>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 21, 9:22=A0pm, "[email protected]"
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:18:25 -0700, Zz Yzx <[email protected]> wrote=
:
> >> >>>OH YEAH BUDDY? =A0I'll put my mind toe-to-toe to yours anytime!
>
> >> >>That's about where yours is; in your toe.
>
> >> >>>Wanna' meet out behind the particle accelerator building?
>
> >> >>I suppose your particles are about the right size for an accelerator=
.
>
> >> >Ah, you've resorted to opportunistic, off-topic insults that don't
> >> >warrant a reply.
>
> >> Wow! =A0There is a big PKB.
>
> >> >ButDO warranet a PLONK.
> >> >PLONK.
>
> >Oh dwat.. sumbuddy else doesn wuv you....
>
> Doesn't surprise me that you'd stick up for the loser. =A0Lefties of a
> feather... =A0

That's it? That's all you got, you unimaginative redneck fool? You
see, that is the biggest problem you right-wing nutbars have: no
imagination. Then, when you see/hear something you don't like or
understand, "IT'S A LEFT-WING conspiracy, man your weapons!!!"

DO try to widen your scope of understanding what goes on around you
and start by taking your head out of your ass.

love,

Rob

kk

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 8:14 PM

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:09:04 -0700, Zz Yzx <[email protected]> wrote:

>>>What part of "global" do you not understand? Your yard is your globe?
>>
>>The same thing the members of the Church of Globalony understand when they
>>blame hurricanes on Globalony Warming. Except in this case it's done poking
>>fun at the members of the Church of Globalony.
>>
>>>Small minds think alike.
>>
>>Seems you do.
>
>OH YEAH BUDDY? I'll put my mind toe-to-toe to yours anytime!

That's about where yours is; in your toe.

>Wanna' meet out behind the particle accelerator building?

I suppose your particles are about the right size for an accelerator.

sS

[email protected] (Scott Lurndal)

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

23/04/2010 5:22 PM

Larry Jaques <[email protected]> writes:
>On 22 Apr 2010 15:37:16 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
>Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>
>>Larry Jaques <[email protected]> writes:
>>>On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:29:13 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
>>><[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>>>
>>>>"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>> On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
>>>>> Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Pacific.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>>>>>>> June.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lew
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global
>>>>>>>Warming?
>>>>>>>;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the
>>>>>>planet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since the
>>>>>>CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in the
>>>>>>atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like coal
>>>>>>and oil.
>>>>>
>>>>> Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.
>>>>
>>>>Or rent a humor gene ...
>>>
>>>I love these "carbon neutral" statements about the forms of heating
>>>which put out up to 400 times the pollution/CO2 than other forms do.
>>>Have you ever seen a quiet valley where there are a dozen home fires
>>>going? It's inundated with smoke so your visibility is cut to the
>>>next house, if you're close enough. I've driven through Merlin, OR
>>>and wondered about the dense fog until I got past the ONE fireplace
>>>which had smoked out the entire freakin' town! I drove through several
>>>miles of it and could smell the smoke, but couldn't see any fireplaces
>>>until then. Two of my neighbors have pellet stoves, and even they're
>>>nasty when you're standing downwind of 'em. Uckfay Oodway Iresfay.
>>>
>>
>>I stand by my statement that burning wood is carbon neutral. Look it up.
>
>Of course you do, Scott. And you'd bet your Birkenstocks on it,
>wouldn't you?
>

What's a birkenstock?

A few minutes of googling would quickly determine that I've no
sympathy for the AGW'ers.

I don't gamble. So, you're incorrect on every point.

scott

sS

[email protected] (Scott Lurndal)

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

22/04/2010 3:37 PM

Larry Jaques <[email protected]> writes:
>On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:29:13 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
><[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>
>>"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
>>> Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>>>
>>>>"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Pacific.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>>>>> June.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lew
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global
>>>>>Warming?
>>>>>;-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the
>>>>planet.
>>>>
>>>>As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since the
>>>>CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in the
>>>>atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like coal
>>>>and oil.
>>>
>>> Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.
>>
>>Or rent a humor gene ...
>
>I love these "carbon neutral" statements about the forms of heating
>which put out up to 400 times the pollution/CO2 than other forms do.
>Have you ever seen a quiet valley where there are a dozen home fires
>going? It's inundated with smoke so your visibility is cut to the
>next house, if you're close enough. I've driven through Merlin, OR
>and wondered about the dense fog until I got past the ONE fireplace
>which had smoked out the entire freakin' town! I drove through several
>miles of it and could smell the smoke, but couldn't see any fireplaces
>until then. Two of my neighbors have pellet stoves, and even they're
>nasty when you're standing downwind of 'em. Uckfay Oodway Iresfay.
>

I stand by my statement that burning wood is carbon neutral. Look it up.

I made no statement in the post above about air pollution (other than
an indirect reference to the particulate matter produced and its effect
on climate), neither did I condemn nor defend burning wood.

scott

sS

[email protected] (Scott Lurndal)

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 5:04 PM

"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>
>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>
>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off the
>> Pacific.
>>
>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru June.
>>
>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>
>>
>> Lew
>
>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global Warming?
>;-)
>

If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the planet.

As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since the
CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in the
atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like coal
and oil.

scott

Wc

"WW"

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 11:13 AM


"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>
> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>
> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off the
> Pacific.
>
> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru June.
>
> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>
>
> Lew
>
>
>
>
>That's Colorado for you. Am I right? ww

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 8:01 PM

On Apr 21, 9:22=A0pm, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:18:25 -0700, Zz Yzx <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>OH YEAH BUDDY? =A0I'll put my mind toe-to-toe to yours anytime!
>
> >>That's about where yours is; in your toe.
>
> >>>Wanna' meet out behind the particle accelerator building?
>
> >>I suppose your particles are about the right size for an accelerator.
>
> >Ah, you've resorted to opportunistic, off-topic insults that don't
> >warrant a reply.
>
> Wow! =A0There is a big PKB.
>
> >ButDO warranet a PLONK.
> >PLONK.
>

Oh dwat.. sumbuddy else doesn wuv you....

Sb

"SonomaProducts.com"

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 8:48 AM

>
> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>
> Lew

If you are running low on logs you might want to toss in my last few
projects. It might take a sledge to get them ready for the fireplace
but that is about what they are worth. :-(

LL

"LDosser"

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

20/04/2010 11:42 PM

"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>
> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>
> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off the
> Pacific.
>
> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru June.
>
> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>
>
> Lew

Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global Warming?
;-)

sD

[email protected] (Doug Miller)

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 10:59 AM

In article <[email protected]>, "Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>
>Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>
>A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
>the Pacific.
>
>The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>June.

Just can't get enough of that global warming... globaloney.

LL

"LDosser"

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 11:29 PM

"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
> Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>
>>"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>>
>>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>>
>>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
>>>> the
>>>> Pacific.
>>>>
>>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>>> June.
>>>>
>>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lew
>>>
>>>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global
>>>Warming?
>>>;-)
>>>
>>
>>If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the
>>planet.
>>
>>As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since the
>>CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in the
>>atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like coal
>>and oil.
>
> Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.

Or rent a humor gene ...

LL

"LDosser"

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

22/04/2010 3:36 PM

"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:29:13 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
> <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>
>>"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
>>> Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>>>
>>>>"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Pacific.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>>>>> June.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lew
>>>>>
>>>>>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global
>>>>>Warming?
>>>>>;-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the
>>>>planet.
>>>>
>>>>As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since the
>>>>CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in the
>>>>atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like
>>>>coal
>>>>and oil.
>>>
>>> Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.
>>
>>Or rent a humor gene ...
>
> I love these "carbon neutral" statements about the forms of heating
> which put out up to 400 times the pollution/CO2 than other forms do.
> Have you ever seen a quiet valley where there are a dozen home fires
> going? It's inundated with smoke so your visibility is cut to the
> next house, if you're close enough. I've driven through Merlin, OR
> and wondered about the dense fog until I got past the ONE fireplace
> which had smoked out the entire freakin' town! I drove through several
> miles of it and could smell the smoke, but couldn't see any fireplaces
> until then. Two of my neighbors have pellet stoves, and even they're
> nasty when you're standing downwind of 'em. Uckfay Oodway Iresfay.

You seen a grass burning?

LL

"LDosser"

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

22/04/2010 10:31 PM

"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:36:49 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
> <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>
>>"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:29:13 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
>>> <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>>>
>>>>"Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>> On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
>>>>> Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in
>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Pacific.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>>>>>>> June.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lew
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global
>>>>>>>Warming?
>>>>>>>;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the
>>>>>>planet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood, since
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like
>>>>>>coal
>>>>>>and oil.
>>>>>
>>>>> Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.
>>>>
>>>>Or rent a humor gene ...
>>>
>>> I love these "carbon neutral" statements about the forms of heating
>>> which put out up to 400 times the pollution/CO2 than other forms do.
>>> Have you ever seen a quiet valley where there are a dozen home fires
>>> going? It's inundated with smoke so your visibility is cut to the
>>> next house, if you're close enough. I've driven through Merlin, OR
>>> and wondered about the dense fog until I got past the ONE fireplace
>>> which had smoked out the entire freakin' town! I drove through several
>>> miles of it and could smell the smoke, but couldn't see any fireplaces
>>> until then. Two of my neighbors have pellet stoves, and even they're
>>> nasty when you're standing downwind of 'em. Uckfay Oodway Iresfay.
>>
>>You seen a grass burning?
>
> Yeah, beautiful, isn't it?
>

A pale shadow of what it was 40 years ago ...

JC

"J. Clarke"

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

23/04/2010 7:43 AM

On 4/22/2010 6:36 PM, LDosser wrote:
> "Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:29:13 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
>> <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>>
>>> "Larry Jaques" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On 21 Apr 2010 17:04:46 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
>>>> Lurndal) scrawled the following:
>>>>
>>>>> "LDosser" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>> "Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in
>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Pacific.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>>>>>> June.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lew
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global
>>>>>> Warming?
>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If anything, the particulate matter in the wood smoke will cool the
>>>>> planet.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for CO2, there is no net gain in CO2 from burning firewood,
>>>>> since the
>>>>> CO2 in the firewood was recently (within a few decades, usually) in
>>>>> the
>>>>> atmosphere. Firewood is 'carbon neutral', unlike fossil fuels like
>>>>> coal
>>>>> and oil.
>>>>
>>>> Crikey, Scott. BUY a braincell.
>>>
>>> Or rent a humor gene ...
>>
>> I love these "carbon neutral" statements about the forms of heating
>> which put out up to 400 times the pollution/CO2 than other forms do.
>> Have you ever seen a quiet valley where there are a dozen home fires
>> going? It's inundated with smoke so your visibility is cut to the
>> next house, if you're close enough. I've driven through Merlin, OR
>> and wondered about the dense fog until I got past the ONE fireplace
>> which had smoked out the entire freakin' town! I drove through several
>> miles of it and could smell the smoke, but couldn't see any fireplaces
>> until then. Two of my neighbors have pellet stoves, and even they're
>> nasty when you're standing downwind of 'em. Uckfay Oodway Iresfay.
>
> You seen a grass burning?

Smoke isn't the problem. It can be a problem locally but it's
particulates and if they get high enough and stay high enough they may
actually help. It's CO2 that's believed to be the problem, and it's
believed that the reason it's a problem is that humans are rapidly
releasing CO2 that was stored over tens of millions of years. So wood
burning, which releases CO2 that would be released in the next couple or
centuries anyway and which will be resorbed by the next generation of
trees, is not a significant part of the problem.

Of course that assumes that anthropogenic global warming is a real
phenomenon and that it's the huge problem that the fear industry makes
it out to be.

Cw

"ChairMan"

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 12:28 PM

In news:7ccedc19-dab0-40a0-84b1-59cdcfc75e1e@j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com,
Robatoy <[email protected]>spewed forth:
> On Apr 21, 6:59 am, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>> In article <[email protected]>, "Lew
>> Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>
>>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>
>>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in
>>> off the Pacific.
>>
>>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru
>>> June.
>>
>> Just can't get enough of that global warming... globaloney.
>
> http://www.ipprospective.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/troll-web.jpg

So, Lew is a troll now?
Okay, whatever...........

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

23/04/2010 8:14 PM

On 23 Apr 2010 17:22:51 GMT, the infamous [email protected] (Scott
Lurndal) scrawled the following:

>Larry Jaques <[email protected]> writes:

>>Of course you do, Scott. And you'd bet your Birkenstocks on it,
>>wouldn't you?
>>
>
>What's a birkenstock?

A lovely sandal worn by AGWKin' libs everywhere.


>A few minutes of googling would quickly determine that I've no
>sympathy for the AGW'ers.

Your recent posts don't reflect that.


>I don't gamble. So, you're incorrect on every point.

Hmm, do you go by another name and stretch art canvas?
<shrug>

--
...in order that a man may be happy, it is necessary that he should
not only be capable of his work, but a good judge of his work.
-- John Ruskin

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to "Lew Hodgett" on 20/04/2010 11:36 PM

21/04/2010 6:37 AM

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:42:24 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
<[email protected]> scrawled the following:

>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> One year ago the temp reached 100F.
>>
>> Today was a struggle to reach the high 60F's.
>>
>> A Spring winter storm, more like a late Winter storm is coming in off the
>> Pacific.
>>
>> The ski resorts are loving it, they expect to be open at least thru June.
>>
>> So, "Throw another log on the fire, .................."
>>
>>
>> Lew
>
>Have you considered what that wood fire will contribute to Global Warming?
>;-)

No. Liberals never do what they preach. Look at their preacher,
Algore's, estate in Kentucky, which, after public shame and eco
retrofit, still uses _20_times_ the energy a typical human's home
requires. (He uses 221,000KWh while I used 5,000 last year, 44 times
my requirement. Nat'l avg is 10,656KWh annually.) For them, it's "Do
as I say, not as I do." Hypocrites, all.

--
"I think you very well may see a revolution in this country and
it will not be a revolution to overthrow the government," he said.
"It would be a revolution to restore government to its constitutional
basis." --Rob Weaver on VoA, 4/19/10


You’ve reached the end of replies