I don't get much in the way of woodworking gloat opportunities around
here. The Craigslist deals are so rare as to be nonexistent, and we
have no woodworking supply stores (or hell, even very many
lumberyards) outside of the larger hardware stores, and I don't have
the ability to hit up estate sales or anything right now.
So when I saw that Home Depot had their Ridgid R4511 table saws on
sale for $299, I had to jump. The table saw my dad had given me, a
nearly 40 year old 9" contractor style saw (with a table mounted
motor), stopped turning on right after I was done making Christmas
gifts last year, so the timing was ideal.
It's going to be an interesting adjustment, I think. In the past I had
to hunt around for 8 1/2" Hitachi blades because I didn't want to pay
a ton of money for the 9" blades, and the motor wasn't really up to
the task of running the 8" dado set I bought a couple of years ago.
But I think buying a saw that was $600 a year ago for $299 isn't too
shabby.
-Nathan
On Feb 5, 3:34=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:34:36 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
>
>
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On Feb 5, 2:07 pm, "Roemax" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> spraying into a rag is not a good idea because one would have to hold =
the
> >> rag
> >> thus allowing the appropriate thinner to come in contact with ones ski=
n and
> >> hand.This would
> >> run the risk of injecting said thinner into ones body.Airless spray pe=
ople
> >> know this is a quick trip to the hospital
> >> and runs the risk amputation.<[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> >>news:[email protected]...
>
> >> > On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:02:09 GMT, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >>To clean finish out of my hvlp sprayer, I follow the instructions of
> >> >>"spraying the appropriate thinner" through the gun. What I didn't li=
ke is
> >> >>the cloud of "appropriate thinner" that this produced. After doing t=
his
> >> >>for
> >> >>more times than I care to admit to, I came up with the idea of remov=
ing
> >> >>the
> >> >>air horns, then turning the turbine on just enough to pressurize the=
cup,
> >> >>shutting it off and *then* spraying the thinner through. With no
> >> >>atomizing
> >> >>air flow, there's no cloud of thinner, no muss, no fuss, just a thin
> >> >>stream
> >> >>of thinner from the tip that goes right back into the mason jar. Hec=
k,
> >> >>with
> >> >>this method, I run the same thinner through a couple of times before=
one
> >> >>final rinse with fresh stuff and the gun is much cleaner as a result=
.
>
> >> >>Again, probably obvious for long-time sprayers (Robert ;-) ), but it=
just
> >> >>dawned on me.
>
> >> >>jc
>
> >> > Spraying into a bunched up rag works pretty well.
>
> >Anybody who would point an airless at a rag in their hands deserves to
> >go to the hospital, locked up and kept there.
>
> It would be nice if you read what I said before posting something as
> stupid as what you just posted.
I was agreeing with Roemax, so why are you poking your snotty little
nose in?
On Feb 5, 6:43=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:55:27 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On Feb 5, 5:48=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
>
> >> HVLP, since you and Robotoy don't know, means
> >> "High Volume - L O W =A0 P R E S S U R E"
>
> >No shit, dickwad?
>
> No shit. Now you know.
...and what part of 3000psig airless did YOU not understand?
On Feb 5, 2:07=A0pm, "Roemax" <[email protected]> wrote:
> spraying into a rag is not a good idea because one would have to hold the
> rag
> thus allowing the appropriate thinner to come in contact with ones skin a=
nd
> hand.This would
> run the risk of injecting said thinner into ones body.Airless spray peopl=
e
> know this is a quick trip to the hospital
> and runs the risk amputation.<[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:02:09 GMT, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>To clean finish out of my hvlp sprayer, I follow the instructions of
> >>"spraying the appropriate thinner" through the gun. What I didn't like =
is
> >>the cloud of "appropriate thinner" that this produced. =A0After doing t=
his
> >>for
> >>more times than I care to admit to, I came up with the idea of removing
> >>the
> >>air horns, then turning the turbine on just enough to pressurize the cu=
p,
> >>shutting it off and *then* spraying the thinner through. =A0With no
> >>atomizing
> >>air flow, there's no cloud of thinner, no muss, no fuss, just a thin
> >>stream
> >>of thinner from the tip that goes right back into the mason jar. =A0Hec=
k,
> >>with
> >>this method, I run the same thinner through a couple of times before on=
e
> >>final rinse with fresh stuff and the gun is much cleaner as a result.
>
> >>Again, probably obvious for long-time sprayers (Robert ;-) ), but it ju=
st
> >>dawned on me.
>
> >>jc
>
> > Spraying =A0into a bunched up rag works pretty well.
Anybody who would point an airless at a rag in their hands deserves to
go to the hospital, locked up and kept there.
On Feb 6, 8:49=A0am, [email protected] wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:15:04 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >On 2/5/10 10:57 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
> >> In article<[email protected]>, "Roemax"<[email protected]=
> =A0wrote:
> >>> Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
> >>> most sane people would use there hand
> >>> thus the hand warning post
> >>> in the future take your hate elsewhere
> >>> you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
>
> >> While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag as sal=
ty
> >> suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described), it is *=
equally*
> >> silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any significant ris=
k of
> >> injury while doing so.
>
> >Are people using industrial sandblasters to paint wall, now? =A0 =A0:-)
>
> No. There are just a couple of "experts" here who don't know what HVLP
> stands for.
And you don't know what 'pressure' really can do until 5 lbs of
pressure destroys 50 or 100 city blocks. Mind you, it is only a
pressure wave created by 2 or 3 megaton of nukular kaboom...but it is
only 5 lbs of over pressure.
But what the hell do I know....
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:15:04 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 2/5/10 10:57 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
>> In article<[email protected]>, "Roemax"<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
>>> most sane people would use there hand
>>> thus the hand warning post
>>> in the future take your hate elsewhere
>>> you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
>>
>> While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag as salty
>> suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described), it is *equally*
>> silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any significant risk of
>> injury while doing so.
>
>Are people using industrial sandblasters to paint wall, now? :-)
No. There are just a couple of "experts" here who don't know what HVLP
stands for.
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 2/5/10 10:57 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
>> In article<[email protected]>,
>> "Roemax"<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
>>> most sane people would use there hand
>>> thus the hand warning post
>>> in the future take your hate elsewhere
>>> you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your
>>> shit
>>
>> While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag
>> as salty
>> suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described),
>> it is *equally*
>> silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any
>> significant risk of
>> injury while doing so.
>
> Are people using industrial sandblasters to paint wall, now?
> :-)
>
It helps get the paint down into the pores. <grin>
--
Nonny
ELOQUIDIOT (n) A highly educated, sophisticated,
and articulate person who has absolutely no clue
concerning what they are talking about.
The person is typically a media commentator or politician.
"N Hurst" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:4d3d4c58-0f93-438f-99b9-807a7fd4995c@e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>I don't get much in the way of woodworking gloat opportunities around
> here. The Craigslist deals are so rare as to be nonexistent, and we
> have no woodworking supply stores (or hell, even very many
> lumberyards) outside of the larger hardware stores, and I don't have
> the ability to hit up estate sales or anything right now.
>
> So when I saw that Home Depot had their Ridgid R4511 table saws on
> sale for $299, I had to jump. The table saw my dad had given me, a
> nearly 40 year old 9" contractor style saw (with a table mounted
> motor), stopped turning on right after I was done making Christmas
> gifts last year, so the timing was ideal.
>
> It's going to be an interesting adjustment, I think. In the past I had
> to hunt around for 8 1/2" Hitachi blades because I didn't want to pay
> a ton of money for the 9" blades, and the motor wasn't really up to
> the task of running the 8" dado set I bought a couple of years ago.
>
> But I think buying a saw that was $600 a year ago for $299 isn't too
> shabby.
>
> -Nathan
something you need to see:
http://www.toolcrib.com/blog/2009/09/28/ridgid-r4511-recalled-arbor-shaft-fails-sends-dado-sets-flying/
To clean finish out of my hvlp sprayer, I follow the instructions of
"spraying the appropriate thinner" through the gun. What I didn't like is
the cloud of "appropriate thinner" that this produced. After doing this for
more times than I care to admit to, I came up with the idea of removing the
air horns, then turning the turbine on just enough to pressurize the cup,
shutting it off and *then* spraying the thinner through. With no atomizing
air flow, there's no cloud of thinner, no muss, no fuss, just a thin stream
of thinner from the tip that goes right back into the mason jar. Heck, with
this method, I run the same thinner through a couple of times before one
final rinse with fresh stuff and the gun is much cleaner as a result.
Again, probably obvious for long-time sprayers (Robert ;-) ), but it just
dawned on me.
jc
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:48:47 -0800, the infamous "Nonny"
<[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>
>"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On 2/5/10 10:57 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
>>> In article<[email protected]>,
>>> "Roemax"<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
>>>> most sane people would use there hand
>>>> thus the hand warning post
>>>> in the future take your hate elsewhere
>>>> you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your
>>>> shit
>>>
>>> While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag
>>> as salty
>>> suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described),
>>> it is *equally*
>>> silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any
>>> significant risk of
>>> injury while doing so.
>>
>> Are people using industrial sandblasters to paint wall, now?
>> :-)
>>
>
>It helps get the paint down into the pores. <grin>
The new HVHP-sand-assisted guns, eh?
--
We don't receive wisdom; we must discover it for ourselves
after a journey that no one can take for us or spare us.
-- Marcel Proust
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:56:29 -0500, "Roemax" <[email protected]> wrote:
>studies suggest that any solvent contact with the skin can be hazardous
>would you wallow in lacquer thinner, MEK or xylene
People with an IQ larger than their hat size wear protective gloves.
"N Hurst" <[email protected]> wrote in message >
> But I think buying a saw that was $600 a year ago for $299 isn't too
> shabby.
>
Good deal. You'll enjoy it.
"N Hurst" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:f1b1eb4e-bf6e-4aeb-8c98-23d4ee80f863@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
Well, I had to take the saw back today.
When I went to unpack it last week, the table top was broken, almost
perfectly 1/4 of the top was busted. All the way in to the insert, and
about halfway down the side.
When I took the top off to assess other damage, the front trunnion was
snapped clean in half, and the carriage assembly was completely
collapsed down inside the cabinet.
There were no other saws in the region, and the nearest Ridgid service
center is 2.5 hours away, with no weekend or evening hours.
All of the staff at the store were commiserating with me at the loss
of such a good deal.
***********************************************************************************
Home Depot's policy is that will take care of sending warranty items out for
the customer. It would be worth calling them to ask them to do so on your
behalf. That way there would be no cost to you for the transportation, and
you'd only be out the wait while the saw gets fixed, or replaced. For a
deal like that, it would be worth the wait. You may have to go through the
service desk or directly to the store manager, but they'll do it.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:07:02 -0500, "Roemax" <[email protected]> wrote:
>spraying into a rag is not a good idea because one would have to hold the
>rag
>thus allowing the appropriate thinner to come in contact with ones skin and
>hand.This would
>run the risk of injecting said thinner into ones body.Airless spray people
>know this is a quick trip to the hospital
>and runs the risk amputation.
HVLP, since you and Robotoy don't know, means
"High Volume - L O W P R E S S U R E"
And nobody, including me, suggested pointing anything into your hand.
><[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:02:09 GMT, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>To clean finish out of my hvlp sprayer, I follow the instructions of
>>>"spraying the appropriate thinner" through the gun. What I didn't like is
>>>the cloud of "appropriate thinner" that this produced. After doing this
>>>for
>>>more times than I care to admit to, I came up with the idea of removing
>>>the
>>>air horns, then turning the turbine on just enough to pressurize the cup,
>>>shutting it off and *then* spraying the thinner through. With no
>>>atomizing
>>>air flow, there's no cloud of thinner, no muss, no fuss, just a thin
>>>stream
>>>of thinner from the tip that goes right back into the mason jar. Heck,
>>>with
>>>this method, I run the same thinner through a couple of times before one
>>>final rinse with fresh stuff and the gun is much cleaner as a result.
>>>
>>>Again, probably obvious for long-time sprayers (Robert ;-) ), but it just
>>>dawned on me.
>>>
>>>jc
>>>
>>
>> Spraying into a bunched up rag works pretty well.
>>
>
Now you just need a $100 Forrest blade and $150 Incra miter guage and
you are almost there. ;^)
Great deal, congrats.
On Jan 13, 6:26=A0am, N Hurst <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't get much in the way of woodworking gloat opportunities around
> here. The Craigslist deals are so rare as to be nonexistent, and we
> have no woodworking supply stores (or hell, even very many
> lumberyards) outside of the larger hardware stores, and I don't have
> the ability to hit up estate sales or anything right now.
>
> So when I saw that Home Depot had their Ridgid R4511 table saws on
> sale for $299, I had to jump. The table saw my dad had given me, a
> nearly 40 year old 9" contractor style saw (with a table mounted
> motor), stopped turning on right after I was done making Christmas
> gifts last year, so the timing was ideal.
>
> It's going to be an interesting adjustment, I think. In the past I had
> to hunt around for 8 1/2" Hitachi blades because I didn't want to pay
> a ton of money for the 9" blades, and the motor wasn't really up to
> the task of running the 8" dado set I bought a couple of years ago.
>
> But I think buying a saw that was $600 a year ago for $299 isn't too
> shabby.
>
> -Nathan
On Feb 5, 5:48=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
>
> HVLP, since you and Robotoy don't know, means
> "High Volume - L O W =A0 P R E S S U R E"
No shit, dickwad?
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:35:16 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Feb 6, 9:33 pm, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:11:42 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >On Feb 6, 8:49 am, [email protected] wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:15:04 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On 2/5/10 10:57 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
>> >> >> In article<[email protected]>, "Roemax"<[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>> Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
>> >> >>> most sane people would use there hand
>> >> >>> thus the hand warning post
>> >> >>> in the future take your hate elsewhere
>> >> >>> you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
>>
>> >> >> While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag as salty
>> >> >> suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described), it is *equally*
>> >> >> silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any significant risk of
>> >> >> injury while doing so.
>>
>> >> >Are people using industrial sandblasters to paint wall, now? :-)
>>
>> >> No. There are just a couple of "experts" here who don't know what HVLP
>> >> stands for.
>>
>> >And you don't know what 'pressure' really can do until 5 lbs of
>> >pressure destroys 50 or 100 city blocks. Mind you, it is only a
>> >pressure wave created by 2 or 3 megaton of nukular kaboom...but it is
>> >only 5 lbs of over pressure.
>> >But what the hell do I know....
>>
>> But we are talking about HVLP paint sprayers, so equating them with
>> something completely unrelated makes you look like an even bigger
>> fool.
>>
>> Let me know when an HVLP paint gun destroys 50 or 100 city blocks,
>> dumbass.
>
>But, but, but it is LOW PRESSURE!!!
Q.E.D.
On Jan 13, 11:31=A0am, "Ed Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "N Hurst" <[email protected]> wrote in message >
> > But I think buying a saw that was $600 a year ago for $299 isn't too
> > shabby.
>
> Good deal. =A0You'll enjoy it.
Well, I had to take the saw back today.
When I went to unpack it last week, the table top was broken, almost
perfectly 1/4 of the top was busted. All the way in to the insert, and
about halfway down the side.
When I took the top off to assess other damage, the front trunnion was
snapped clean in half, and the carriage assembly was completely
collapsed down inside the cabinet.
There were no other saws in the region, and the nearest Ridgid service
center is 2.5 hours away, with no weekend or evening hours.
All of the staff at the store were commiserating with me at the loss
of such a good deal.
I'm hoping Ridgid comes out with their new saw quickly, as I don't
live in a strong woodworking area, and Home Depot is the only store
that carries decent equipment now that Lowes has stopped carrying
Delta.
Otherwise, I'll be saving my pennies for a Grizzly 1023.
spraying into a rag is not a good idea because one would have to hold the
rag
thus allowing the appropriate thinner to come in contact with ones skin and
hand.This would
run the risk of injecting said thinner into ones body.Airless spray people
know this is a quick trip to the hospital
and runs the risk amputation.
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:02:09 GMT, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>To clean finish out of my hvlp sprayer, I follow the instructions of
>>"spraying the appropriate thinner" through the gun. What I didn't like is
>>the cloud of "appropriate thinner" that this produced. After doing this
>>for
>>more times than I care to admit to, I came up with the idea of removing
>>the
>>air horns, then turning the turbine on just enough to pressurize the cup,
>>shutting it off and *then* spraying the thinner through. With no
>>atomizing
>>air flow, there's no cloud of thinner, no muss, no fuss, just a thin
>>stream
>>of thinner from the tip that goes right back into the mason jar. Heck,
>>with
>>this method, I run the same thinner through a couple of times before one
>>final rinse with fresh stuff and the gun is much cleaner as a result.
>>
>>Again, probably obvious for long-time sprayers (Robert ;-) ), but it just
>>dawned on me.
>>
>>jc
>>
>
> Spraying into a bunched up rag works pretty well.
>
Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
most sane people would use there hand
thus the hand warning post
in the future take your hate elsewhere
you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:55:27 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 5, 5:48 pm, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> HVLP, since you and Robotoy don't know, means
>>> "High Volume - L O W P R E S S U R E"
>>
>>No shit, dickwad?
>>
>
> No shit. Now you know.
In article <[email protected]>, "Roemax" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
>most sane people would use there hand
>thus the hand warning post
>in the future take your hate elsewhere
>you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag as salty
suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described), it is *equally*
silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any significant risk of
injury while doing so.
On 2/5/10 10:57 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
> In article<[email protected]>, "Roemax"<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
>> most sane people would use there hand
>> thus the hand warning post
>> in the future take your hate elsewhere
>> you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
>
> While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag as salty
> suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described), it is *equally*
> silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any significant risk of
> injury while doing so.
Are people using industrial sandblasters to paint wall, now? :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
studies suggest that any solvent contact with the skin can be hazardous
would you wallow in lacquer thinner, MEK or xylene
many older painters are experiencing nervous system effects from solvent
contact.
why take the chance ,why suggest such contact to people who might not know
better
and yes I know what HVLP is,I own a couple of turbines and have been
spraying professionally for over 40 years
"Nonny" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 2/5/10 10:57 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
>>> In article<[email protected]>, "Roemax"<[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
>>>> most sane people would use there hand
>>>> thus the hand warning post
>>>> in the future take your hate elsewhere
>>>> you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
>>>
>>> While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag as salty
>>> suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described), it is
>>> *equally*
>>> silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any significant risk
>>> of
>>> injury while doing so.
>>
>> Are people using industrial sandblasters to paint wall, now? :-)
>>
>
> It helps get the paint down into the pores. <grin>
>
> --
> Nonny
>
> ELOQUIDIOT (n) A highly educated, sophisticated,
> and articulate person who has absolutely no clue
> concerning what they are talking about.
> The person is typically a media commentator or politician.
>
>
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:34:36 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Feb 5, 2:07 pm, "Roemax" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> spraying into a rag is not a good idea because one would have to hold the
>> rag
>> thus allowing the appropriate thinner to come in contact with ones skin and
>> hand.This would
>> run the risk of injecting said thinner into ones body.Airless spray people
>> know this is a quick trip to the hospital
>> and runs the risk amputation.<[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:02:09 GMT, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >>To clean finish out of my hvlp sprayer, I follow the instructions of
>> >>"spraying the appropriate thinner" through the gun. What I didn't like is
>> >>the cloud of "appropriate thinner" that this produced. After doing this
>> >>for
>> >>more times than I care to admit to, I came up with the idea of removing
>> >>the
>> >>air horns, then turning the turbine on just enough to pressurize the cup,
>> >>shutting it off and *then* spraying the thinner through. With no
>> >>atomizing
>> >>air flow, there's no cloud of thinner, no muss, no fuss, just a thin
>> >>stream
>> >>of thinner from the tip that goes right back into the mason jar. Heck,
>> >>with
>> >>this method, I run the same thinner through a couple of times before one
>> >>final rinse with fresh stuff and the gun is much cleaner as a result.
>>
>> >>Again, probably obvious for long-time sprayers (Robert ;-) ), but it just
>> >>dawned on me.
>>
>> >>jc
>>
>> > Spraying into a bunched up rag works pretty well.
>
>Anybody who would point an airless at a rag in their hands deserves to
>go to the hospital, locked up and kept there.
It would be nice if you read what I said before posting something as
stupid as what you just posted.
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:54:29 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Feb 5, 3:34 pm, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:34:36 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >On Feb 5, 2:07 pm, "Roemax" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> spraying into a rag is not a good idea because one would have to hold the
>> >> rag
>> >> thus allowing the appropriate thinner to come in contact with ones skin and
>> >> hand.This would
>> >> run the risk of injecting said thinner into ones body.Airless spray people
>> >> know this is a quick trip to the hospital
>> >> and runs the risk amputation.<[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> >> > On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:02:09 GMT, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> >>To clean finish out of my hvlp sprayer, I follow the instructions of
>> >> >>"spraying the appropriate thinner" through the gun. What I didn't like is
>> >> >>the cloud of "appropriate thinner" that this produced. After doing this
>> >> >>for
>> >> >>more times than I care to admit to, I came up with the idea of removing
>> >> >>the
>> >> >>air horns, then turning the turbine on just enough to pressurize the cup,
>> >> >>shutting it off and *then* spraying the thinner through. With no
>> >> >>atomizing
>> >> >>air flow, there's no cloud of thinner, no muss, no fuss, just a thin
>> >> >>stream
>> >> >>of thinner from the tip that goes right back into the mason jar. Heck,
>> >> >>with
>> >> >>this method, I run the same thinner through a couple of times before one
>> >> >>final rinse with fresh stuff and the gun is much cleaner as a result.
>>
>> >> >>Again, probably obvious for long-time sprayers (Robert ;-) ), but it just
>> >> >>dawned on me.
>>
>> >> >>jc
>>
>> >> > Spraying into a bunched up rag works pretty well.
>>
>> >Anybody who would point an airless at a rag in their hands deserves to
>> >go to the hospital, locked up and kept there.
>>
>> It would be nice if you read what I said before posting something as
>> stupid as what you just posted.
>
> I was agreeing with Roemax, so why are you poking your snotty little
>nose in?
How many of the "stupid pills" did you take?
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:55:27 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Feb 5, 5:48 pm, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>
>> HVLP, since you and Robotoy don't know, means
>> "High Volume - L O W P R E S S U R E"
>
>No shit, dickwad?
>
No shit. Now you know.
"Joe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> To clean finish out of my hvlp sprayer, I follow the instructions of
> "spraying the appropriate thinner" through the gun. What I didn't like is
> the cloud of "appropriate thinner" that this produced. After doing this
> for more times than I care to admit to, I came up with the idea of
> removing the air horns, then turning the turbine on just enough to
> pressurize the cup, shutting it off and *then* spraying the thinner
> through. With no atomizing air flow, there's no cloud of thinner, no
> muss, no fuss, just a thin stream of thinner from the tip that goes right
> back into the mason jar. Heck, with this method, I run the same thinner
> through a couple of times before one final rinse with fresh stuff and the
> gun is much cleaner as a result.
>
> Again, probably obvious for long-time sprayers (Robert ;-) ), but it just
> dawned on me.
>
> jc
>
>
Wow, and to think all this started because I mis-posted a tip under an
existing thread instead of a thread by itself
:-)
I'm gonna go watch some football.
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:36:47 -0500, "Roemax" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
>most sane people would use there hand
>thus the hand warning post
>in the future take your hate elsewhere
>you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
>
>
Oh, boo-hoo. Any competent person can spray into a bunched up rag
without any danger whatsover to their hands. You must be quite the
spastic if you can't manage that.
And once again - The poster specified an HVLP gun, which I've now
explained to you so you know what it is for next time.
><[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:55:27 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Feb 5, 5:48 pm, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> HVLP, since you and Robotoy don't know, means
>>>> "High Volume - L O W P R E S S U R E"
>>>
>>>No shit, dickwad?
>>>
>>
>> No shit. Now you know.
>
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:02:09 GMT, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>To clean finish out of my hvlp sprayer, I follow the instructions of
>"spraying the appropriate thinner" through the gun. What I didn't like is
>the cloud of "appropriate thinner" that this produced. After doing this for
>more times than I care to admit to, I came up with the idea of removing the
>air horns, then turning the turbine on just enough to pressurize the cup,
>shutting it off and *then* spraying the thinner through. With no atomizing
>air flow, there's no cloud of thinner, no muss, no fuss, just a thin stream
>of thinner from the tip that goes right back into the mason jar. Heck, with
>this method, I run the same thinner through a couple of times before one
>final rinse with fresh stuff and the gun is much cleaner as a result.
>
>Again, probably obvious for long-time sprayers (Robert ;-) ), but it just
>dawned on me.
>
>jc
>
Spraying into a bunched up rag works pretty well.
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:11:42 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Feb 6, 8:49 am, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:15:04 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 2/5/10 10:57 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
>> >> In article<[email protected]>, "Roemax"<[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
>> >>> most sane people would use there hand
>> >>> thus the hand warning post
>> >>> in the future take your hate elsewhere
>> >>> you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
>>
>> >> While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag as salty
>> >> suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described), it is *equally*
>> >> silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any significant risk of
>> >> injury while doing so.
>>
>> >Are people using industrial sandblasters to paint wall, now? :-)
>>
>> No. There are just a couple of "experts" here who don't know what HVLP
>> stands for.
>
>And you don't know what 'pressure' really can do until 5 lbs of
>pressure destroys 50 or 100 city blocks. Mind you, it is only a
>pressure wave created by 2 or 3 megaton of nukular kaboom...but it is
>only 5 lbs of over pressure.
>But what the hell do I know....
But we are talking about HVLP paint sprayers, so equating them with
something completely unrelated makes you look like an even bigger
fool.
Let me know when an HVLP paint gun destroys 50 or 100 city blocks,
dumbass.
On Feb 6, 9:33=A0pm, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:11:42 -0800 (PST), Robatoy
>
>
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On Feb 6, 8:49 am, [email protected] wrote:
> >> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:15:04 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On 2/5/10 10:57 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
> >> >> In article<[email protected]>, "Roemax"<roe...@vernal.=
net> wrote:
> >> >>> Salty do you hold the rag with your mouth
> >> >>> most sane people would use there hand
> >> >>> thus the hand warning post
> >> >>> in the future take your hate elsewhere
> >> >>> you are now officially killfiled I don't need to hear your shit
>
> >> >> While I think it's pretty silly to spray the solvent into a rag as =
salty
> >> >> suggested (since it prevents re-using it as the OP described), it i=
s *equally*
> >> >> silly to suggest as you did that an HVLP gun poses any significant =
risk of
> >> >> injury while doing so.
>
> >> >Are people using industrial sandblasters to paint wall, now? :-)
>
> >> No. There are just a couple of "experts" here who don't know what HVLP
> >> stands for.
>
> >And you don't know what 'pressure' really can do until 5 lbs of
> >pressure destroys 50 or 100 city blocks. Mind you, it is only a
> >pressure wave created by 2 or 3 megaton of nukular kaboom...but it is
> >only 5 lbs of over pressure.
> >But what the hell do I know....
>
> But we are talking about HVLP paint sprayers, so equating them with
> something completely unrelated makes you look like an even bigger
> fool.
>
> Let me know when an HVLP paint gun destroys 50 or 100 city blocks,
> dumbass.
But, but, but it is LOW PRESSURE!!!