OT: Simple English

On Jan 15, 11:23=A0am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> nicely done.
>
I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of mine in
Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in Havana...so I
don't know who to give credit to.

On Jan 15, 6:05=A0pm, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, "Dave In =
Texas" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > =A0 =A0Imagine my surprise, taking a linguistic course [to satisfy the =
6 hr
> >cultural heritage degree requirement], to find that English is, in fact,
> >Germanic in it's origins.
>
> Oh, yes. Most of the English words for the basics of everyday life are
> unmistakeably Germanic:
>
> Bier, Wein, Milch, Wasser, Brot, Butter, Mett =3D beer, wine, milk, water=
,
> bread, butter, meat
>
> Vater, Mutter, Bruder, Schwester =3D father, mother, brother, sister
>
> Haus, Tafel, Stuhl =3D house, table, chair (stool)
>
> Hand, Finger =3D (obvious)

Meat =3D Fleisch

On Jan 15, 4:17=A0pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 3:03=A0pm, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 3:59=A0pm, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Innews:[email protected].=
com,
> > > [email protected] <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
>
> > > > On Jan 15, 2:04 pm, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> Innews:[email protected]=
ps.com,
> > > >> Robatoy <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
>
> > > >>> On Jan 15, 1:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wro=
te:
> > > >>>> On Jan 15, 11:22 am, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >>>>> On Jan 15, 12:20 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
>
> > > >>>>>> On Jan 15, 10:40 am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>
> > > >>>>>>> Robatoy wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> +1
>
> > > >>>>>>>>> nicely done.
>
> > > >>>>>>>> I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of
> > > >>>>>>>> mine in Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker =
in
> > > >>>>>>>> Havana...so I don't know who to give credit to.
>
> > > >>>>>>> Hookers never accept credit.
>
> > > >>>>>> Sure they do.
>
> > > >>>>>>https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453
>
> > > >>>>> Troll!
>
> > > >>>> Humorless leftist twit. ...though I repeat myself.
>
> > > >>> Fuck off.
>
> > > >> Do you realize that that 4-letter word is an acronym for:
>
> > > >> "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" and was instigated by the Bobbies =
in
> > > >> Queen Victoria's time?.
>
> > > > False
>
> > > >http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.asp
>
> > > Right, wrong, or indifferent, It seemed quite apropos LOL
> > > P D Q
>
> > I thought so... and I'm pretty sure the troll knows what it means to
> > be TOLD!
>
> You are such a baby, Robby. =A0Grow up man!

At least I'm not yellow.

On Jan 15, 6:19=A0pm, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Innews:[email protected],
> Doug Miller <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
>
> > In article <[email protected]>, "PDQ"
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Do you realize that that 4-letter word is an acronym for:
>
> >> "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" and was instigated by the Bobbies in
> >> Queen Victoria's time?.
>
> > It is nothing of the kind.
>
> > You are apparently unaware that the word predates Victoria by _at
> > least_ three
> > and a half centuries. The first known appearance _in print_ is dated
> > 1503, and
> > the word is almost certainly _far_ older than that.
>
> What I do not comprehend is those among us who consistently
>
> fail to appreciate the thought implied
> attempt to further elucidate upon the actual etymology
> fail miserably at any semblance of bonhomie.
>
> Is it not nice to know trhat we have a lot for which to thank the Jutes, =
Angles, and Saxons for our verbiage? =A0That is not to cast any aspersions =
upon those who utilized Sanskirt in their daily communications.
>
> Mendatum caco.
>
> P D Q

Whao!, Q! I never knew!

Robatoy wrote:
> On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> nicely done.
>>
> I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of mine in
> Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in Havana...so I
> don't know who to give credit to.

Hookers never accept credit.

"Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:06bc48aa-ab9b-44e8-8bd0-e68b81da1a13@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> nicely done.
>
I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of mine in
Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in Havana...so I
don't know who to give credit to.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully that's all he got from the hooker in Havana.

B.

On Jan 15, 10:40=A0am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Robatoy wrote:
> > On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> +1
>
> >> nicely done.
>
> > I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of mine in
> > Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in Havana...so I
> > don't know who to give credit to.
>
> Hookers never accept credit.

Sure they do.

https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453

On Jan 15, 12:32=A0pm, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 1:10=A0pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 11:22=A0am, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 15, 12:20=A0pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrot=
e:
>
> > > > On Jan 15, 10:40=A0am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]> wro=
te:
>
> > > > > Robatoy wrote:
> > > > > > On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> +1
>
> > > > > >> nicely done.
>
> > > > > > I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of min=
e in
> > > > > > Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in Havana..=
.so I
> > > > > > don't know who to give credit to.
>
> > > > > Hookers never accept credit.
>
> > > > Sure they do.
>
> > > >https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453
>
> > > Troll!
>
> > Humorless leftist twit. =A0 ...though I repeat myself.
>
> Fuck off.

Your ox gets gored and you can't come up with an answer (not even
IKWYABWAI). You can't even ignore it. You must lash out and then use
foul language. No surprises; typical leftist.

On Jan 15, 2:04=A0pm, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Innews:dfad9391-429a-4c20-bd33-bd1d1b305cfc@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com,
> Robatoy <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 1:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Jan 15, 11:22 am, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> On Jan 15, 12:20 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> On Jan 15, 10:40 am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Robatoy wrote:
> >>>>>> On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> +1
>
> >>>>>>> nicely done.
>
> >>>>>> I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of mine
> >>>>>> in Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in
> >>>>>> Havana...so I don't know who to give credit to.
>
> >>>>> Hookers never accept credit.
>
> >>>> Sure they do.
>
> >>>>https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453
>
> >>> Troll!
>
> >> Humorless leftist twit. ...though I repeat myself.
>
> > Fuck off.
>
> Do you realize that that 4-letter word is an acronym for:
>
> "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" and was instigated by the Bobbies in Quee=
n Victoria's time?.

False

http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.asp

On 1/15/2010 10:20 AM, Robatoy wrote:
> As you may have noticed, I decided to play hookie from the shop today.


> Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in
> ze forst plas.

Now, I don't care who you are, that there is funny!

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

+1

nicely done.


"Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:5f278c5a-939c-47de-a0c0-182882233931@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> As you may have noticed, I decided to play hookie from the shop today.
> =========
> Subject: Simple English
>
> The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby
> English will be the official language of the European Union rather
> than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the
> negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling
> had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5-year phase-in plan
> that would become known as 'Euro-English'.
>
> In the first year, 's' will replace the soft 'c'. Sertainly, this will
> make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard 'c' will be dropped in
> favour of 'k'. This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have
> one less letter. There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond
> year when the troublesome 'ph' will be replaced with 'f'. This will
> make words like fotograf 20% shorter.
>
> In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted
> to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible.
>
> Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have
> always ben a deterent to akurate speling.
>
> Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent 'e' in the languag
> is disgrasful and it should go away.
>
> By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing 'th'
> with 'z' and 'w' with 'v'.
>
> During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary 'o' kan be dropd from vords
> kontaining 'ou' and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensibl
> riten styl.
>
> Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu
> understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.
>
> Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in
> ze forst plas.

Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote in news:5f278c5a-939c-47de-a0c0-
[email protected]:

As a born Dutchman, I can fully understand.

In my 60+ years, Dutch has undergone at least 3 fully sanctioned changes in
official spelling. At the introduction of the last one (or the one before
that), the chair of the committee was explaining the rules and flaunted
them by giving an example. Since I have been living in the US since 1969,
I can't remember whether the change was from pannekoek to pannenkoek, or
vice versa, since I now call it pancake.

Bisquick makes great "flensjes", say my grandkids.

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid

On Jan 15, 3:03=A0pm, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 3:59=A0pm, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Innews:[email protected]=
m,
> > [email protected] <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
>
> > > On Jan 15, 2:04 pm, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Innews:[email protected]=
.com,
> > >> Robatoy <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
>
> > >>> On Jan 15, 1:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote=
:
> > >>>> On Jan 15, 11:22 am, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> On Jan 15, 12:20 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > >>>>> wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> On Jan 15, 10:40 am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>> Robatoy wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> +1
>
> > >>>>>>>>> nicely done.
>
> > >>>>>>>> I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of
> > >>>>>>>> mine in Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in
> > >>>>>>>> Havana...so I don't know who to give credit to.
>
> > >>>>>>> Hookers never accept credit.
>
> > >>>>>> Sure they do.
>
> > >>>>>>https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453
>
> > >>>>> Troll!
>
> > >>>> Humorless leftist twit. ...though I repeat myself.
>
> > >>> Fuck off.
>
> > >> Do you realize that that 4-letter word is an acronym for:
>
> > >> "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" and was instigated by the Bobbies in
> > >> Queen Victoria's time?.
>
> > > False
>
> > >http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.asp
>
> > Right, wrong, or indifferent, It seemed quite apropos LOL
> > P D Q
>
> I thought so... and I'm pretty sure the troll knows what it means to
> be TOLD!

You are such a baby, Robby. Grow up man!

On Jan 15, 12:20=A0pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 10:40=A0am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Robatoy wrote:
> > > On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> +1
>
> > >> nicely done.
>
> > > I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of mine in
> > > Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in Havana...so I
> > > don't know who to give credit to.
>
> > Hookers never accept credit.
>
> Sure they do.
>
> https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453

Troll!

On Jan 15, 11:22=A0am, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 12:20=A0pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 10:40=A0am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Robatoy wrote:
> > > > On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> +1
>
> > > >> nicely done.
>
> > > > I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of mine in
> > > > Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in Havana...so =
I
> > > > don't know who to give credit to.
>
> > > Hookers never accept credit.
>
> > Sure they do.
>
> >https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453
>
> Troll!

Humorless leftist twit. ...though I repeat myself.

On Jan 15, 1:10=A0pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 11:22=A0am, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 12:20=A0pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 15, 10:40=A0am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]> wrote=
:
>
> > > > Robatoy wrote:
> > > > > On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> +1
>
> > > > >> nicely done.
>
> > > > > I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of mine =
in
> > > > > Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in Havana...s=
o I
> > > > > don't know who to give credit to.
>
> > > > Hookers never accept credit.
>
> > > Sure they do.
>
> > >https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453
>
> > Troll!
>
> Humorless leftist twit. =A0 ...though I repeat myself.

Fuck off.

On Jan 15, 3:59=A0pm, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Innews:75f63a74-4752-4838-88bc-df6826a0ef49@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com,
> [email protected] <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 2:04 pm, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Innews:[email protected]=
om,
> >> Robatoy <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
>
> >>> On Jan 15, 1:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On Jan 15, 11:22 am, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Jan 15, 12:20 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On Jan 15, 10:40 am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> Robatoy wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> +1
>
> >>>>>>>>> nicely done.
>
> >>>>>>>> I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of
> >>>>>>>> mine in Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in
> >>>>>>>> Havana...so I don't know who to give credit to.
>
> >>>>>>> Hookers never accept credit.
>
> >>>>>> Sure they do.
>
> >>>>>>https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453
>
> >>>>> Troll!
>
> >>>> Humorless leftist twit. ...though I repeat myself.
>
> >>> Fuck off.
>
> >> Do you realize that that 4-letter word is an acronym for:
>
> >> "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" and was instigated by the Bobbies in
> >> Queen Victoria's time?.
>
> > False
>
> >http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.asp
>
> Right, wrong, or indifferent, It seemed quite apropos LOL
> P D Q

I thought so... and I'm pretty sure the troll knows what it means to
be TOLD!

Dear Keith,

It's a woodworking newsgroup.

yes, politics get discussed and posted. Members then take it upon
themselves to weigh the on-topic contributions to decide who is worth
keeping around and who is not.

As such, dear Keith....

<PLONK>

Wow, that was easy.

In =
news:dfad9391-429a-4c20-bd33-bd1d1b305cfc@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com,
Robatoy <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
> On Jan 15, 1:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Jan 15, 11:22 am, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Jan 15, 12:20 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:=20
>>=20
>>>> On Jan 15, 10:40 am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:=20
>>=20
>>>>> Robatoy wrote:
>>>>>> On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>=20
>>>>>>> nicely done.
>>=20
>>>>>> I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of mine
>>>>>> in Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in
>>>>>> Havana...so I don't know who to give credit to.
>>=20
>>>>> Hookers never accept credit.
>>=20
>>>> Sure they do.
>>=20
>>>> https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453
>>=20
>>> Troll!
>>=20
>> Humorless leftist twit. ...though I repeat myself.
>=20
> Fuck off.

Do you realize that that 4-letter word is an acronym for:

"For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" and was instigated by the Bobbies in =
Queen Victoria's time?.

P D Q

In =
news:75f63a74-4752-4838-88bc-df6826a0ef49@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com,
[email protected] <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
> On Jan 15, 2:04 pm, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> =
Innews:dfad9391-429a-4c20-bd33-bd1d1b305cfc@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com,=

>> Robatoy <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Jan 15, 1:10 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Jan 15, 11:22 am, Robatoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>=20
>>>>> On Jan 15, 12:20 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>=20
>>>>>> On Jan 15, 10:40 am, "Greg Neill" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>=20
>>>>>>> Robatoy wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jan 15, 11:23 am, "Joe" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>=20
>>>>>>>>> nicely done.
>>=20
>>>>>>>> I thought so too, that's why I passed it along. A friend of
>>>>>>>> mine in Winnipeg sent it to me, and he got it from a hooker in
>>>>>>>> Havana...so I don't know who to give credit to.
>>=20
>>>>>>> Hookers never accept credit.
>>=20
>>>>>> Sure they do.
>>=20
>>>>>> https://my.democrats.org/page/contribute?source=3DNETA453
>>=20
>>>>> Troll!
>>=20
>>>> Humorless leftist twit. ...though I repeat myself.
>>=20
>>> Fuck off.
>>=20
>> Do you realize that that 4-letter word is an acronym for:
>>=20
>> "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" and was instigated by the Bobbies in
>> Queen Victoria's time?.=20
>=20
> False
>=20
> http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.asp

Right, wrong, or indifferent, It seemed quite apropos LOL
P D Q

In article <[email protected]>, "PDQ" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Do you realize that that 4-letter word is an acronym for:
>
>"For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" and was instigated by the Bobbies in
>Queen Victoria's time?.

It is nothing of the kind.

You are apparently unaware that the word predates Victoria by _at least_ three
and a half centuries. The first known appearance _in print_ is dated 1503, and
the word is almost certainly _far_ older than that.

In article <[email protected]>, "Dave In Texas" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Imagine my surprise, taking a linguistic course [to satisfy the 6 hr
>cultural heritage degree requirement], to find that English is, in fact,
>Germanic in it's origins.

Oh, yes. Most of the English words for the basics of everyday life are
unmistakeably Germanic:

Bier, Wein, Milch, Wasser, Brot, Butter, Mett = beer, wine, milk, water,
bread, butter, meat

Vater, Mutter, Bruder, Schwester = father, mother, brother, sister

Haus, Tafel, Stuhl = house, table, chair (stool)

Hand, Finger = (obvious)

In news:[email protected],
Doug Miller <[email protected]> dropped this bit of wisdom:
> In article <[email protected]>, "PDQ"
> <[email protected]> wrote:=20
>>=20
>> Do you realize that that 4-letter word is an acronym for:
>>=20
>> "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge" and was instigated by the Bobbies in
>> Queen Victoria's time?.
>=20
> It is nothing of the kind.
>=20
> You are apparently unaware that the word predates Victoria by _at
> least_ three=20
> and a half centuries. The first known appearance _in print_ is dated
> 1503, and=20
> the word is almost certainly _far_ older than that.

What I do not comprehend is those among us who consistently=20

fail to appreciate the thought implied=20
attempt to further elucidate upon the actual etymology=20
fail miserably at any semblance of bonhomie.

Is it not nice to know trhat we have a lot for which to thank the Jutes, =
Angles, and Saxons for our verbiage? That is not to cast any aspersions =
upon those who utilized Sanskirt in their daily communications.

Mendatum caco.

P D Q

"Joe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> +1
>
> nicely done.
>
>
> "Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:5f278c5a-939c-47de-a0c0-182882233931@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>> As you may have noticed, I decided to play hookie from the shop today.
>> =========
>> Subject: Simple English

Imagine my surprise, taking a linguistic course [to satisfy the 6 hr
cultural heritage degree requirement], to find that English is, in fact,
Germanic in it's origins.
Go figure.

Dave in Houston

"Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:5f278c5a-939c-47de-a0c0-182882233931@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...


Hey! did you watch Leno last night.? LOL


He had a comedian on the show that covered England English, Russian, German,
etc.


He mentioned that the English over state the "T" sometimes, Sometimes not.

Open the letter

Open the LeT Ter.

Open the le'er

Talk to you la'er