Possible video of the shooting of the Oregonian rancher.
I don't know how or why this video was shot.
The beginning is not worth watching, just bull shit propaganda,
But the video of the guy being shot in the back with his hands up is
interesting. ( I am not calling it cold blooded, because I can't see the
fine detail, but I am saying this is questionable).
See about 13 minutes in, on.
Around 14 minutes they shoot him in the back.
Yea he was stopped, then took off on a high speed run, but the shooting
in the back with hands up is tough to justify.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW4bz4Mafr0
Way toward the end, I didn't watch the whole video, I had it on pause
and for some reason it started itself automatically, there are clips of
Obama saying he was training ISIS to go after Asad, (WHAT!!!!!) that
sure backfired.
We never learn our lessons do we, we have history repeating itself over
and over. Afghanistan vs Russians, that became Al Qaeda..
.. Our politicians are idiots, they don't study history very well..
Since they keep repeating it.
--
--
Jeff
Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote in news:17Sdnc2dLtsaFiPLnZ2dnUU7-
> [email protected]:
>
>
>> what'cha building these day Doug? ;~)
>
> Lots of plumbing and rough carpentry the last few weeks. SWMBO and I bought a fixer-upper
> to downsize into -- kids are grown and out of the house, and we don't need a big house and
> big yard any more. After a year of searching, we found *exactly* the property we wanted,
> except that it's not move-in ready.
>
Cool! At least when you are finished you will know what's what about the
house.
We did it a little differently. We moved out and upsized, and built. Our
son bought us out. :-). We house hunted for 25 years and like you found the
one that filled our needs. Good luck!
On 2/12/2016 7:38 PM, Doug Miller wrote:
> OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:aasnbb96qiccnc24n2f9o9n0qepjo2mbu4@
> 4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:04:02 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:2kbkbbt3672pu8dm3j2bg0qk3og5lf670q@
>>> 4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:57:36 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>> [email protected]:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then I suggest you read the constitution,
>>>
>>> I have, thank you very much. Possibly you missed the part where it says "Treason
> against
>>> the United States shall consist only in levying war against them..."
>>
>> Guess you missed the part about the right to bear arms and a well
>> order militia, etc.
>
> Are you seriously contending that the right to bear arms includes taking up arms against
> your own government?
what'cha building these day Doug? ;~)
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:57:36 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
<[email protected]> wrote:
>woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
>[email protected]:
>
>>
>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>
>Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>
Then I suggest you read the constitution, as well as the thoughts of
out founding fathers who understood the concept that power corrupts
and absolute power totally corrupts. We were to have a well ordered
militia for a very good reason. The Federal Government was to serve
the people, the United States of America. The were never called to
rule or supercede any states rights. We had at one time three sections
of power to the Feds, to insure peace and the constitution. Now they
have blurred into one serving the other.
Oregon is a good example where they just confiscated the land for
federal usage and for the feds to make money on by granting leases.
>> Some were called patriots in the American Revolution.
>
>Not by both sides, they weren't. The British called them traitors, and hanged them. Even some
>of the colonists called them traitors. We call them patriots now only because the revolution
>succeeded.
Taxation without representation is slavery.
Children... CHILDREN!
Be respectful of the other kids and take your pissing match somewhere else.=
This is a woodworking site for all things woodworking.
The proper forum that allows you to piss freely in each other's faces is he=
re:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.politics
This woodworking group has been literally destroyed by all the political vo=
mit spewed on its pages by self righteous experts that screech the latest i=
ndignations as described by their favorite news outlet. =20
At one time this group was about 500 active people, and it was abandoned by=
just about everyone (Karl got me to take a look about 2 years ago, I was g=
one for about 5) as they tore out their hair, shit blasted one another and =
generally took over this woodworking group to espouse their own brand of po=
litical diarrhea.=20
And for what? In the end, their political diatribes, their long debates of=
their well-Googled opinions bolstered by their favorite radio and print ex=
perts amounted to nothing. They used this venue to shit on each other and =
made it so unpleasant for everyone else that just wanted to talk about wood=
working that many valuable voices are gone. Permanently.
Shame on them for being the biggest bullies on the playground ruining this =
place for so many. Shame on you if you follow in their footsteps.
I don't care if you have any respect for yourself, but for those of us that=
want to keep it a woodworking group, take it somewhere else. =20
Robert
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Children... CHILDREN!
>
>Be respectful of the other kids and take your pissing match
>somewhere else. This is a woodworking site for all things
>woodworking.
>
>The proper forum that allows you to piss freely in each other's
>faces is here:
>
>https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.politics
>
>This woodworking group has been literally destroyed by all the
>political vomit spewed on its pages by self righteous experts that
>screech the latest indignations as described by their favorite news
>outlet.
>
>At one time this group was about 500 active people, and it was
>abandoned by just about everyone (Karl got me to take a look about 2
>years ago, I was gone for about 5) as they tore out their hair, shit
>blasted one another and generally took over this woodworking group
>to espouse their own brand of political diarrhea.
>
>And for what? In the end, their political diatribes, their long
>debates of their well-Googled opinions bolstered by their favorite
>radio and print experts amounted to nothing. They used this venue
>to shit on each other and made it so unpleasant for everyone else
>that just wanted to talk about woodworking that many valuable voices
>are gone. Permanently.
>
>Shame on them for being the biggest bullies on the playground
>ruining this place for so many. Shame on you if you follow in their
>footsteps.
>
>I don't care if you have any respect for yourself, but for those of
>us that want to keep it a woodworking group, take it somewhere else.
>
>Robert
+1
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 01:38:12 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
<[email protected]> wrote:
>OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:aasnbb96qiccnc24n2f9o9n0qepjo2mbu4@
>4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:04:02 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:2kbkbbt3672pu8dm3j2bg0qk3og5lf670q@
>>>4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:57:36 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>[email protected]:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>>>>>
>>>>>Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then I suggest you read the constitution,
>>>
>>>I have, thank you very much. Possibly you missed the part where it says "Treason
>against
>>>the United States shall consist only in levying war against them..."
>>
>> Guess you missed the part about the right to bear arms and a well
>> order militia, etc.
>
>Are you seriously contending that the right to bear arms includes taking up arms against
>your own government?
>>
>> Do you realize what it means to levy war against the USA? Not a
>> skirmish, nor a defensive more against those who seek to be
>> imperialistic?
>
>Taking up arms against the government of the USA certainly seems to qualify.
It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from it's government."
-- Thomas Paine
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:56:53 -0500, Bill <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Doug Miller (and others) wrote:
>> I have, thank you very much. Possibly you missed the part where it says "Treason
>> against
>>>> the United States shall consist only in levying war against them..."
>>> Guess you missed the part about the right to bear arms and a well
>>> order militia, etc.
>> Are you seriously contending that the right to bear arms includes taking up arms against
>> your own government?
>That was part of the intent. Not everyone trusted the government. Should
>they have?
Correct. It was seen as the last defense against tyranny.
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
>
> woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
> [email protected]:
>
> >
> > Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>
> Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
This word gets bandied about quite a lot. The Founders had experience
of treason, having committed quite a lot of it and gotten away with it.
They chose to define it as follows:
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war
against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and
comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony
of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court."
> > Some were called patriots in the American Revolution.
>
> Not by both sides, they weren't. The British called them traitors, and hanged them. Even some
> of the colonists called them traitors. We call them patriots now only because the revolution
> succeeded.
And there's the real issue. If they win then they aren't traitors
anymore.
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
>
> OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:aasnbb96qiccnc24n2f9o9n0qepjo2mbu4@
> 4ax.com:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:04:02 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:2kbkbbt3672pu8dm3j2bg0qk3og5lf670q@
> >>4ax.com:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:57:36 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
> >>>>[email protected]:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
> >>>>
> >>>>Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Then I suggest you read the constitution,
> >>
> >>I have, thank you very much. Possibly you missed the part where it says "Treason
> against
> >>the United States shall consist only in levying war against them..."
> >
> > Guess you missed the part about the right to bear arms and a well
> > order militia, etc.
>
> Are you seriously contending that the right to bear arms includes taking up arms against
> your own government?
> >
> > Do you realize what it means to levy war against the USA? Not a
> > skirmish, nor a defensive more against those who seek to be
> > imperialistic?
>
> Taking up arms against the government of the USA certainly seems to qualify.
So no action of government can in your mind justify taking up arms
against it? Selling women into slavery, making soap out of Jews, eating
babies? None of that would justify it, we should just go along voting
out tweedledum and voting in tweedledee, whose major point of political
contention is whether babies are best served fried or baked, and get on
with our lives, those of us who are not women, Jews, or babies and thus
still have lives?
woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in news:seadnbvAIc_B4yrLnZ2dnUU7-c-
[email protected]:
> Possible video of the shooting of the Oregonian rancher.
> I don't know how or why this video was shot.
>
> The beginning is not worth watching, just bull shit propaganda,
> But the video of the guy being shot in the back with his hands up is
> interesting.
Except that he *didn't* have his hands up when he was shot.
He did have his hands up shortly before that, true, but watch the video again. He *lowers* his
hands, starts to reach inside his coat -- and that's when he gets shot.
BTW, there was a loaded 9mm handgun inside the coat where he was reaching.
OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:svvfbb1pjdilqcajn2tdaq0hdphiut16rf@
4ax.com:
> That was lost years ago when they started shooting ranchers and so
> called militia any which way they could, this shooting just re
> enforced it all.
Well, I'll grant you that law enforcement often goes
overboard, especially the ones that have equipped
themselves with military surplus gear and fantasize
that in every arrest they're Rambo saving us from evil.
But on the otherhand, the "so called militia" are
men taking up arms against their country. In plain
language, they are traitors (*). I have no problem
with them being shot, any more than I would if they
were fighting with ISIS.
(* "simple minded fools" would be another plain
language description of them).
John
woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
[email protected]:
>
> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
> Some were called patriots in the American Revolution.
Not by both sides, they weren't. The British called them traitors, and hanged them. Even some
of the colonists called them traitors. We call them patriots now only because the revolution
succeeded.
Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7- [email protected]:
>
>>
>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>
> Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>
>> Some were called patriots in the American Revolution.
>
> Not by both sides, they weren't. The British called them traitors, and
> hanged them. Even some of the colonists called them traitors. We call
> them patriots now only because the revolution succeeded.
Exactly so. Someone who takes up arms against his government
is a traitor until he succeeds in replacing that government.
Robert E Lee and his fellow Southerners were called patriots,
but because they didn't succeed in replacing the government
they ended up treated as traitors.
John
OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> Oregon is a good example where they just confiscated the land for
> federal usage and for the feds to make money on by granting leases.
Um, just in the interest of accuracy here - the land in
question in Oregon, the wildlife refuge, was never
"confiscated". It was always federal land, and it was
made into a wildlife refuge by Theodore Roosevelt over
100 years ago.
I think you may have been drinking a little too much of
the wingnut fringe Koolaid...
John
OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:2kbkbbt3672pu8dm3j2bg0qk3og5lf670q@
4ax.com:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:57:36 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
>>[email protected]:
>>
>>>
>>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>>
>>Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>>
>
> Then I suggest you read the constitution,
I have, thank you very much. Possibly you missed the part where it says "Treason against
the United States shall consist only in levying war against them..."
Just Wondering <[email protected]> wrote in news:_3Duy.156$zm6.48
@fx20.iad:
> On 2/9/2016 3:59 PM, John McCoy wrote:
>>
>> Robert E Lee and his fellow Southerners were called
>> patriots, but because they didn't succeed in replacing
>> the government they ended up treated as traitors.
>>
> If they had ended up treated as traitors, they would have
> been charged, tried, sentenced, and executed or imprisoned
> for life. That's not what happened.
Au contraire, for many of them it was what happened. Those
who were still imprisoned (i.e. not dead) were pardoned by
President Johnson in 1868.
Note that specific to Lee, his property was confiscated
(without any 4th amendment compensation, either). Just for
spite the US Army used the grounds around his house as a
graveyard, to ensure he would not try to recover it after
the war.
John
OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:aasnbb96qiccnc24n2f9o9n0qepjo2mbu4@
4ax.com:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:04:02 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:2kbkbbt3672pu8dm3j2bg0qk3og5lf670q@
>>4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:57:36 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in
news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>[email protected]:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>>>>
>>>>Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then I suggest you read the constitution,
>>
>>I have, thank you very much. Possibly you missed the part where it says "Treason
against
>>the United States shall consist only in levying war against them..."
>
> Guess you missed the part about the right to bear arms and a well
> order militia, etc.
Are you seriously contending that the right to bear arms includes taking up arms against
your own government?
>
> Do you realize what it means to levy war against the USA? Not a
> skirmish, nor a defensive more against those who seek to be
> imperialistic?
Taking up arms against the government of the USA certainly seems to qualify.
Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote in news:17Sdnc2dLtsaFiPLnZ2dnUU7-
[email protected]:
> what'cha building these day Doug? ;~)
Lots of plumbing and rough carpentry the last few weeks. SWMBO and I bought a fixer-upper
to downsize into -- kids are grown and out of the house, and we don't need a big house and
big yard any more. After a year of searching, we found *exactly* the property we wanted,
except that it's not move-in ready.
On 2/9/2016 3:59 PM, John McCoy wrote:
>
> Robert E Lee and his fellow Southerners were called
> patriots, but because they didn't succeed in replacing
> the government they ended up treated as traitors.
>
If they had ended up treated as traitors, they would have
been charged, tried, sentenced, and executed or imprisoned
for life. That's not what happened.
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:04:02 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
<[email protected]> wrote:
>OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:2kbkbbt3672pu8dm3j2bg0qk3og5lf670q@
>4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:57:36 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
>>>[email protected]:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>>>
>>>Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>>>
>>
>> Then I suggest you read the constitution,
>
>I have, thank you very much. Possibly you missed the part where it says "Treason against
>the United States shall consist only in levying war against them..."
Guess you missed the part about the right to bear arms and a well
order militia, etc.
Do you realize what it means to levy war against the USA? Not a
skirmish, nor a defensive more against those who seek to be
imperialistic?
Just something to think about, and I have been all through this
before, and I also served my Country by my free will and was not
drafted. A militia protecting our borders, which some are doing now in
order to spare the lives of the ranchers who live near the border are
a group of men doing the right thing for the right reasons.
Well, I have said more than I was going to, sorry, but I did come here
for the learning of WW'ing. So this is the end of my dalliance on this
subject.
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:02:33 -0000 (UTC), John McCoy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:svvfbb1pjdilqcajn2tdaq0hdphiut16rf@
>4ax.com:
>
>> That was lost years ago when they started shooting ranchers and so
>> called militia any which way they could, this shooting just re
>> enforced it all.
>
>Well, I'll grant you that law enforcement often goes
>overboard, especially the ones that have equipped
>themselves with military surplus gear and fantasize
>that in every arrest they're Rambo saving us from evil.
>
>But on the otherhand, the "so called militia" are
>men taking up arms against their country. In plain
>language, they are traitors (*). I have no problem
>with them being shot, any more than I would if they
>were fighting with ISIS.
>
>(* "simple minded fools" would be another plain
>language description of them).
>
>John
I suppose then that the militia who are protecting parts of our
southern borders are in that same group?
There are lots of militia groups around, they are legal, and are
recommended by the constitution and the founding fathers.
It is a narrow path, but better than pot, a pot of boiling water for
the frogs to dwell in.
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:47:03 +0000, Spalted Walt
<[email protected]> wrote:
>"[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Children... CHILDREN!
>>
>>Be respectful of the other kids and take your pissing match
>>somewhere else. This is a woodworking site for all things
>>woodworking.
>>
>>The proper forum that allows you to piss freely in each other's
>>faces is here:
>>
>>https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.politics
>>
>>This woodworking group has been literally destroyed by all the
>>political vomit spewed on its pages by self righteous experts that
>>screech the latest indignations as described by their favorite news
>>outlet.
>>
>>At one time this group was about 500 active people, and it was
>>abandoned by just about everyone (Karl got me to take a look about 2
>>years ago, I was gone for about 5) as they tore out their hair, shit
>>blasted one another and generally took over this woodworking group
>>to espouse their own brand of political diarrhea.
>>
>>And for what? In the end, their political diatribes, their long
>>debates of their well-Googled opinions bolstered by their favorite
>>radio and print experts amounted to nothing. They used this venue
>>to shit on each other and made it so unpleasant for everyone else
>>that just wanted to talk about woodworking that many valuable voices
>>are gone. Permanently.
>>
>>Shame on them for being the biggest bullies on the playground
>>ruining this place for so many. Shame on you if you follow in their
>>footsteps.
>>
>>I don't care if you have any respect for yourself, but for those of
>>us that want to keep it a woodworking group, take it somewhere else.
>>
>>Robert
>
>+1
HURRAY!
Me too
+2
Doug Miller wrote:
> woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
> [email protected]:
>
>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
> Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>
>> Some were called patriots in the American Revolution.
> Not by both sides, they weren't. The British called them traitors, and hanged them. Even some
> of the colonists called them traitors. We call them patriots now only because the revolution
> succeeded.
Recommend a trip to (Colonial) Williamsburg, VA, where you can relive
this in "simulated" real time. I promise you'll gain insights that they
omitted in school. And if you go off-season and pick up a coupon as you
cross a state line, Comfort Suites has a jacuzzi next to the pool (for
about $79 night). There is plenty of woodworking to enjoy.
Bill
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:57:36 +0000, Doug Miller wrote:
>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>
> Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>
>> Some were called patriots in the American Revolution.
>
> Not by both sides, they weren't. The British called them traitors, and
> hanged them. Even some of the colonists called them traitors. We call
> them patriots now only because the revolution succeeded.
Treason doth not prosper,
here's the reason.
For if it prosper,
none dare call it treason.
John Donne
--
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Doug Miller (and others) wrote:
> I have, thank you very much. Possibly you missed the part where it says "Treason
> against
>>> the United States shall consist only in levying war against them..."
>> Guess you missed the part about the right to bear arms and a well
>> order militia, etc.
> Are you seriously contending that the right to bear arms includes taking up arms against
> your own government?
That was part of the intent. Not everyone trusted the government. Should
they have?
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 23:02:39 -0000 (UTC), John McCoy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:[email protected]:
>
>> Oregon is a good example where they just confiscated the land for
>> federal usage and for the feds to make money on by granting leases.
>
>Um, just in the interest of accuracy here - the land in
>question in Oregon, the wildlife refuge, was never
>"confiscated". It was always federal land, and it was
>made into a wildlife refuge by Theodore Roosevelt over
>100 years ago.
Yes, it was federal land as most of the property in western United
States, but farmers and ranchers had use of it during that time up
until around 1996 when they started disallowing the families who lived
and farmed there for generation under agreements with the feds. All
the lands under the feds had been confiscated.
>
>I think you may have been drinking a little too much of
>the wingnut fringe Koolaid...
>
>John
It sure beats the garland of flowers on your head. ;)
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 12:26:50 -0500, woodchucker <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Possible video of the shooting of the Oregonian rancher.
>I don't know how or why this video was shot.
>
>The beginning is not worth watching, just bull shit propaganda,
>But the video of the guy being shot in the back with his hands up is
>interesting. ( I am not calling it cold blooded, because I can't see the
>fine detail, but I am saying this is questionable).
>
>See about 13 minutes in, on.
>Around 14 minutes they shoot him in the back.
>Yea he was stopped, then took off on a high speed run, but the shooting
>in the back with hands up is tough to justify.
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW4bz4Mafr0
>
>Way toward the end, I didn't watch the whole video, I had it on pause
>and for some reason it started itself automatically, there are clips of
>Obama saying he was training ISIS to go after Asad, (WHAT!!!!!) that
>sure backfired.
>
>We never learn our lessons do we, we have history repeating itself over
>and over. Afghanistan vs Russians, that became Al Qaeda..
>.. Our politicians are idiots, they don't study history very well..
>Since they keep repeating it.
When I was a child I had a lot of respect for them, all trained in the
law and science plus.
That was lost years ago when they started shooting ranchers and so
called militia any which way they could, this shooting just re
enforced it all.
I remember going to a parts house in downtown LA to pick up some order
parts and misc only to find ten trucks loaded with the men in black,
helmets, BP Vests, stomping boots machine guns at the ready and
pistols drawn. Shouting, yelling, commanding and the poor guys that
ran the local parts house, one peed in his pants and the other two
looked next to death. Up against the wall they were while they swarmed
through the bldg looking for records, yes, just paperwork.
LOL, they had an unused bathroom that they storing years old printouts
in, and it was very messy, they took every scrap, the cash registers,
computers, CC machines and so on. I'd hate to go through all those
business transactions.
I was their last customer for the day. I swear, that sight was far
worse than when the LA Riots were going on, and then they were not to
be seen.
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 01:38:12 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
<[email protected]> wrote:
>OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:aasnbb96qiccnc24n2f9o9n0qepjo2mbu4@
>4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:04:02 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:2kbkbbt3672pu8dm3j2bg0qk3og5lf670q@
>>>4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:57:36 -0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>woodchucker <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:wqqdnT3c1qu9xyTLnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>[email protected]:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
>>>>>
>>>>>Everyone who takes up arms against his own country is a traitor.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then I suggest you read the constitution,
>>>
>>>I have, thank you very much. Possibly you missed the part where it says "Treason
>against
>>>the United States shall consist only in levying war against them..."
>>
>> Guess you missed the part about the right to bear arms and a well
>> order militia, etc.
>
>Are you seriously contending that the right to bear arms includes taking up arms against
>your own government?
>>
>> Do you realize what it means to levy war against the USA? Not a
>> skirmish, nor a defensive more against those who seek to be
>> imperialistic?
>
>Taking up arms against the government of the USA certainly seems to qualify.
The government has no problems taking up arms against its people.
Various Policing depts love to out power the civies, and drive bullet
proof vehicles and suit up with kevlar. Equal rights?
So have you built a nice crossbow from wood or wood and bamboo yet?
What do you use for your arrows, steel billet or ash?
Have you tried a pistol version yet?
On 2/8/2016 5:02 PM, John McCoy wrote:
> OFWW <[email protected]> wrote in news:svvfbb1pjdilqcajn2tdaq0hdphiut16rf@
> 4ax.com:
>
>> That was lost years ago when they started shooting ranchers and so
>> called militia any which way they could, this shooting just re
>> enforced it all.
>
> Well, I'll grant you that law enforcement often goes
> overboard, especially the ones that have equipped
> themselves with military surplus gear and fantasize
> that in every arrest they're Rambo saving us from evil.
>
> But on the otherhand, the "so called militia" are
> men taking up arms against their country. In plain
> language, they are traitors (*). I have no problem
> with them being shot, any more than I would if they
> were fighting with ISIS.
>
> (* "simple minded fools" would be another plain
> language description of them).
>
> John
>
Well John, not everyone that takes up arms is a traitor.
Some were called patriots in the American Revolution.
If you look at some of the things our government is doing, you might be
taking up arms.
I read both sides of the argument. Both have their pluses and minuses.
Now if you really think about it, their protest was a moderate one at
that. It wasn't too far over the top. They had some good points.
I also think 8 years in prison after already serving a year for a fire
that spread from private land to public land was a miscarriage of
justice. It's what originally ignited these guys. Even the judge that
gave them 1 thought that was harsh. So when the prosecutor appealed when
they were being released, I think you have to wonder. Murders serve 7
years, and a father and son are getting 8 for a fire. BTW the fire only
burned one acre of land that bordered the son's property. No one was
hurt, and this was in farm grazing country. So it's understandable why
these guys decided to use this issue as their protest.
If you view the video somewhere around 30 minutes (yea I know a lot of
bs in this one) you have Obama saying how he is giving money and
training to ISIL (ISIS) ... to fight Asad...
Boy our politicians never learn .. Afghanistan = Al Qaeda..
Isil = Our biggest thread.
Who's the biggest traitor??? The farmers, or the man who supported ISIS
and trained them?
I'm not supporting the Oregonians, but I'm not against what they are
saying either. I think our country has a lot of angry people, and keeps
trying to please those that want to harm us. These farmers used to be
the biggest patriots, but the government worked against them . They
manipulated the markets.
We have to go back to a free market, and keep the government out of our
businesses .. with exceptions..
There should be some fair guidelines so that the consumer is not taken
advantage of by monopolies or rigged business. We need to keep
government out, so the playing field becomes level again. We have to
have some common sense approach to things, and realize that not everyone
will be happy.
Easier said then done.
--
Jeff