In article <[email protected]>,
G.W. Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
> Leon wrote:
> > Why?
> >
> > No cancer warning labels on the fish!
> >
> > http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26594251/radioactive-tuna-found-off-california-coast-29494268.html
> But radiation kills cancer.
Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells
--
Stuart Winsor
Only plain text for emails
http://www.asciiribbon.org
In article <[email protected]>,
Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:
> >> But radiation kills cancer.
> >
> > Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells
> >
> Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
> measured and targeted is concerned?
Well I don't but maybe G.W.Ross does.
> Brass does not cause cancer either but brass fittings have the Prop65
> cancer warning label.
U.S. thing obviously
--
Stuart Winsor
Only plain text for emails
http://www.asciiribbon.org
Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>On 5/29/2012 3:51 PM, Stuart wrote:
>> In article<[email protected]>,
>> G.W. Ross<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Leon wrote:
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> No cancer warning labels on the fish!
>>>>
>>>> http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26594251/radioactive-tuna-found-off-california-coast-29494268.html
>>
>>> But radiation kills cancer.
>>
>> Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells
>>
>
>Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
>measured and targeted is concerned?
>
Given that the amount of cesium-134 and cesium-137 found in the tuna emitted
radiation at less than background levels, there are no health effects, just
FUD effects.
One should be far more worried about the levels of Hg in tuna.
On 5/29/2012 12:29 PM, Leon wrote:
> Why?
>
> No cancer warning labels on the fish!
>
> http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26594251/radioactive-tuna-found-off-california-coast-29494268.html
>
Radiation? Yes. But radiation so low that highly specialized methods and
equipment were required to separate it from the natural background
radiation and low enough that you would be required to eat thousands of
pounds of that expensive bluefin (sushi) tuna in a year to approach the
acknowledged unsafe dosage. This is not your average grocery store canned
(nor fresh) tuna. Most of the bluefin caught off of California and Mexico
are frozen and shipped to Japan to be sold to the sushi restaurants for
exorbitant prices.
On 5/29/2012 7:09 PM, Steve B wrote:
> "Leon"<lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Why?
>>
>> No cancer warning labels on the fish!
>>
>> http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26594251/radioactive-tuna-found-off-california-coast-29494268.html
>
> "how water?"
>
> That doesn't make any sense.
>
>
oops, Hot
You should know by now that "I"
Seldom/NEVER write anything down perfectly. Thank you for getting
clarification before pressing the big black nuclear launch button. ;~)
"Leon" <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why?
>
> No cancer warning labels on the fish!
>
> http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26594251/radioactive-tuna-found-off-california-coast-29494268.html
"how water?"
That doesn't make any sense.
On Wed, 30 May 2012 07:02:24 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>You should know by now that "I"
>Seldom/NEVER write anything down perfectly. Thank you for getting
>clarification before pressing the big black nuclear launch button. ;~)
Well, just in case any of you suspect that you are around any
Californian radioactive fish, I have the perfect SmartPhone for you.
http://www.itbusiness.ca/it/client/en/CDN/News.asp?id=67682#xdm_e=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.itbusiness.ca&xdm_c=default7824&xdm_p=1&
On 5/29/2012 3:51 PM, Stuart wrote:
> In article<[email protected]>,
> G.W. Ross<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Leon wrote:
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> No cancer warning labels on the fish!
>>>
>>> http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26594251/radioactive-tuna-found-off-california-coast-29494268.html
>
>> But radiation kills cancer.
>
> Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells
>
Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
measured and targeted is concerned?
Brass does not cause cancer either but brass fittings have the Prop65
cancer warning label.
On 5/29/2012 6:54 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> Leon<lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>> On 5/29/2012 3:51 PM, Stuart wrote:
>>> In article<[email protected]>,
>>> G.W. Ross<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Leon wrote:
>>>>> Why?
>>>>>
>>>>> No cancer warning labels on the fish!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26594251/radioactive-tuna-found-off-california-coast-29494268.html
>>>
>>>> But radiation kills cancer.
>>>
>>> Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells
>>>
>>
>> Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
>> measured and targeted is concerned?
>>
>
> Given that the amount of cesium-134 and cesium-137 found in the tuna emitted
> radiation at less than background levels, there are no health effects, just
> FUD effects.
Yeah, I think that is what the link mentioned.
>
> One should be far more worried about the levels of Hg in tuna.
On 5/29/2012 6:51 PM, Stuart wrote:
> In article<[email protected]>,
> Leon<lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:
>>>> But radiation kills cancer.
>>>
>>> Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells
>>>
>
>> Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
>> measured and targeted is concerned?
>
> Well I don't but maybe G.W.Ross does.
Probably not. ;~)
>
>> Brass does not cause cancer either but brass fittings have the Prop65
>> cancer warning label.
>
> U.S. thing obviously
>
No, it is a California thing. LOL