I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
the in-feed fence.
I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
movement.
Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> the in-feed fence.
>
> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> movement.
>
> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>
> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
Best of luck.
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:03:19 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>>Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>
>Try it with glass.
With the proper glue no problem.
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:28:13 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 1/14/18 4:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
>>>>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak
>>>>> up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when
>>>>> clamping.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue
>>>> is not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in
>>>> the joint. Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of
>>>> back and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it.
>>>> Glue starvation as it is often called is when there is no or not
>>>> enough glue on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze
>>>> out. You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
>>>> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have no
>>>> indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
>>>> because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
>>>> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is
>>>> almost invisible.
>>>
>>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and those are
>>> three of them.
>>> Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>>
>> Try it with glass.
>>
>
>Does the bottle state the product works on glass?
>Don't look, I'll tell you. No, it doesn't.
>
No, it doesn't because it needs a mechanical connection to the
surface. That requires a texture, much as they tell you to rough up
gloss paint before repainting (after cure).
>The glass comparison is totally irrelevant.
>The glue doesn't work on many many things, but that in no way supports
>your "smooth surface" theory.
No, it really isn't.
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:04:35 GMT, Puckdropper <[email protected]>
wrote:
>[email protected] wrote in
>news:[email protected]:
>
>>
>> I don't think the issue is tooth marks (there shouldn't be any). The
>> issue is the "polished surface". The glue has to have something to
>> bite into. A polished surface doesn't work. Try using Titebond on
>> glass.
>
>How strong is a wood glue joint if both pieces have been shellaced first?
>I wonder if the wood glue causes a slight swelling in doing its magic.
Probably not strong at all. Now you have two bonds--the
shellac-to-wood bond and the glue-to-shellac bond.
>
>Puckdropper
On 1/14/18 5:54 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:28:13 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/14/18 4:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE-
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router
>>>>>>>> table leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface
>>>>>> won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out
>>>>>> too much when clamping.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical
>>>>> yellow/wood glue is not a good gap filler and works best with
>>>>> a minimum of product in the joint. Tooth marks create gaps.
>>>>> Additionally there is a lot of back and forth talk on
>>>>> starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation
>>>>> as it is often called is when there is no or not enough glue
>>>>> on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze out.
>>>>> You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
>>>>> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have
>>>>> no indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a
>>>>> joint fail because of too much clamping pressure and causing
>>>>> too much glue to squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint
>>>>> line is one that is almost invisible.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and
>>>> those are three of them. Glue doesn't "bite" and holds
>>>> perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>>>
>>> Try it with glass.
>>>
>>
>> Does the bottle state the product works on glass? Don't look, I'll
>> tell you. No, it doesn't.
>>
> No, it doesn't because it needs a mechanical connection to the
> surface. That requires a texture, much as they tell you to rough up
> gloss paint before repainting (after cure).
>
>> The glass comparison is totally irrelevant. The glue doesn't work
>> on many many things, but that in no way supports your "smooth
>> surface" theory.
>
> No, it really isn't.
>
Paint isn't glue and not all "mechanical" connections are the same.
I don't think you truly understand how wood glue bonds.
In any case, I think we may closer to being on the same page than we
think.
I believe you are correct when you say a surface can be "too smooth."
When I was at a home show, some years back, I spoke at length to a
representative of Franklin Adhesives who was also a chemical engineer
who worked in adhesive development for years until retiring to be a rep
at these home shows.
It was another time that this subject had come up and I asked him about
it.
He said it was almost impossible to get a wood surface too smooth to
adhere well with glues, using most woodworking power tools. He did say
that the surface could be "burnished" to the point that would weaken the
joint somewhat, but it would still be strong enough for most glue
joints. He added that he knew of no woodworking power tools that would
yield this kind of surface.
He then when on to say, "If you are ever in doubt, all you have to do is
put a drop of water on the surface of the wood. If it soaks in, it's
fine. If it beads up and sits on the surface, then hit it with some 220
grit and glue it up."
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 5:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:25:46 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/14/18 4:02 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:02:00 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/13/2018 9:43 PM, Michael wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 9:06:05 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>>>>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>>>>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>>>>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>>>>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>>>>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>>>>>>>> movement.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>>>>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>>>>>>>>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>>>>>>>>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>>>>>>>>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>>>>>>> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
>>>>>>> that is buttery smooth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when clamping.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue is
>>>> not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in the
>>>> joint. Tooth marks create gaps.
>>>> Additionally there is a lot of back and forth talk on starving a joint
>>>> by squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation as it is often called is
>>>> when there is no or not enough glue on the surface to begin with not
>>>> because you had squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was too
>>>> much glue in the joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you
>>>> have no indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint
>>>> fail because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
>>>> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is almost
>>>> invisible.
>>>
>>> I don't think the issue is tooth marks (there shouldn't be any). The
>>> issue is the "polished surface". The glue has to have something to
>>> bite into. A polished surface doesn't work. Try using Titebond on
>>> glass.
>>>
>>
>> That is simply not true and a completely apples to oranges...
>> well, no, actually a wood to glass comparison.
>
> Yes, it is. It's just an order of magnitude or so different. It's
> still a mechanical connection. It's not like a plastic glue, where
> it's more of a weld.
>
There we have it. Plastic glue is a solvent, not a glue. :-p
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 6:31 PM, Markem wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:03:19 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>> Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>>
>> Try it with glass.
>
> With the proper glue no problem.
>
All still irrelevant since the context of this discussion if a wood/PVA
glue bond.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:25:46 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 1/14/18 4:02 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:02:00 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/13/2018 9:43 PM, Michael wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 9:06:05 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>>>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>>>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>>>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>>>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>>>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>>>>>>> movement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>>>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>>>>>>>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>>>>>>>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>>>>>>>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>>>>>> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>>>>>
>>>>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>>>>>
>>>>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>>>>>
>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
>>>>>> that is buttery smooth.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>>
>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when clamping.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue is
>>> not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in the
>>> joint. Tooth marks create gaps.
>>> Additionally there is a lot of back and forth talk on starving a joint
>>> by squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation as it is often called is
>>> when there is no or not enough glue on the surface to begin with not
>>> because you had squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was too
>>> much glue in the joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you
>>> have no indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint
>>> fail because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
>>> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is almost
>>> invisible.
>>
>> I don't think the issue is tooth marks (there shouldn't be any). The
>> issue is the "polished surface". The glue has to have something to
>> bite into. A polished surface doesn't work. Try using Titebond on
>> glass.
>>
>
>That is simply not true and a completely apples to oranges...
>well, no, actually a wood to glass comparison.
Yes, it is. It's just an order of magnitude or so different. It's
still a mechanical connection. It's not like a plastic glue, where
it's more of a weld.
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:31:12 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>
> When jointing on a router table, the fences are *supposed* to be mis-aligned.
Correct!
> The out-feed fence is supposed to be about 1/16" closer to the operator than
> the in-feed fence.
Correct!
> The bit is then aligned flush with the face of the out-feed
> fence.
Correct!
I'm suspecting the two fences, outfeed and infeed, are not parallel, despite their being offset. They are not exactly coplanar. They need to be offset and they also need to be perfectly coplanar.
I suspect your hand movement is giving you a misjudged idea of why you are having the bump. It's not your hand movement that's the (main, if at all) problem. Check to make sure your fences are coplanar, despite their being offset.
Sonny
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:38:29 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
> On 1/13/2018 5:37 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:55:47 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> >> On 1/13/2018 4:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> >>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> >>> the in-feed fence.
> >>>
> >>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> >>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> >>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> >>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> >>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> >>> movement.
> >>>
> >>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> >>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >>>
> >>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >>>
> >> I have not joined on a router, but frequently use the router to create
> >> profiles on picture frames. I have found that I get the best results
> >> using feather boards on the in fed and out feed ends of the router.
> >> This then keeps the piece firmly against the fence on both sides to the
> >> bit for the length of the piece. With the fence I only have to keep the
> >> piece flat against the table, which I fine easier that trying to keep it
> >> against the fence and the table. Without the feather board I find the I
> >> tend to get waves in the route.
> >>
> >> The router table is a Sears router table to which I attache a standard
> >> router. The fence is only about 18". I use a one piece fence with an
> >> opening for the bit. I have had good results using this technique with
> >> frames as long as 40 inches.
> >>
> >> I suspect that the same technique may work when joining.
> >>
> >
> > Just FYI...It's jointing, not joining.
>
> I think it is joining.
I'm pretty sure it's jointing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jointer
http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?cat=1&p=41801
>
> >
> > When jointing on a router table, you don't want pressure on the in-feed
> > fence.
>
> Well, yes you do, until you have enough on the out feed side to apply
> pressure to and not both at the same time.
Right. My problem is that with a 36" board, there is more time spent on
the out-feed side than the in-feed side. What is your definition of "enough"
on the out feed side? If I switch to putting pressure on the out-feed fence
after 12" or even 18" I still have to move my hands at least once or I'll
run out of fence or table from a "hand position" perspective. That's when
my bump occurs.
https://i.imgur.com/hjSOHrP.jpg
>
> All pressure should be on the out-feed fence which is supposed
> > to be proud of the in-feed fence and flush with the cutting surface of
> > the bit. See here:
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
> >
>
> He acknowledges my comment above, pressure on the in feed to begin.
No argument there. I'll agree that I wasn't clear when I talked about
"no pressure on the in-feed fence". Obviously, you need pressure on the
in_feed fence at the start of the feed.
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> > > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> > > > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> > > > the in-feed fence.
> > > >
> > > > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> > > > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> > > > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> > > > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> > > > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> > > > movement.
> > > >
> > > > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> > > > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> > > >
> > > > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> > >
> > > I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
> > >
> > > Best of luck.
> >
> > That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
> > table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
> > may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
> > a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
> >
> > https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
> >
> > See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>
> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
that is buttery smooth.
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 18:22:08 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>> >> >>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
>> >> >>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak
>> >> >>> up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when
>> >> >>> clamping.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue
>> >> >> is not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in
>> >> >> the joint. Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of
>> >> >> back and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it.
>> >> >> Glue starvation as it is often called is when there is no or not
>> >> >> enough glue on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze
>> >> >> out. You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
>> >> >> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have no
>> >> >> indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
>> >> >> because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
>> >> >> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is
>> >> >> almost invisible.
>> >> >
>> >> >Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and those are
>> >> >three of them.
>> >> >Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>> >>
>> >> Try it with glass.
>> >
>> >Apples and Gorillas
>>
>> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
>
>OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to this thread and
>get back to the actual issue.
>
>Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a straight router
>bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too smooth for Titebond III
>to perform its designed task?
Cut with a sharp tool, likely not. Scorched, perhaps.
On Monday, January 15, 2018 at 8:46:38 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 18:22:08 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> >> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
> >> >> >>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
> >> >> >>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Not the best for a glue up.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak
> >> >> >>> up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too mucggh when
> >> >> >>> clamping.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue
> >> >> >> is not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in
> >> >> >> the joint. Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of
> >> >> >> back and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it.
> >> >> >> Glue starvation as it is often called is when there is no or not
> >> >> >> enough glue on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze
> >> >> >> out. You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
> >> >> >> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have no
> >> >> >> indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
> >> >> >> because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
> >> >> >> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is
> >> >> >> almost invisible.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and those are
> >> >> >three of them.
> >> >> >Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
> >> >>
> >> >> Try it with glass.
> >> >
> >> >Apples and Gorillas
> >>
> >> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
> >
> >OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to this thread and
> >get back to the actual issue.
> >
> >Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a straight router
> >bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too smooth for Titebond III
> >to perform its designed task?
>
> Cut with a sharp tool, likely not. Scorched, perhaps.
Brand new Whiteside bit, straight out of the box. Pretty darn sharp.
I'll let you know if the glue-up ever fails. ;-)
DerbyDad03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:38:29 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>> On 1/13/2018 5:37 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:55:47 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On 1/13/2018 4:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>> movement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>
>>>> I have not joined on a router, but frequently use the router to create
>>>> profiles on picture frames. I have found that I get the best results
>>>> using feather boards on the in fed and out feed ends of the router.
>>>> This then keeps the piece firmly against the fence on both sides to the
>>>> bit for the length of the piece. With the fence I only have to keep the
>>>> piece flat against the table, which I fine easier that trying to keep it
>>>> against the fence and the table. Without the feather board I find the I
>>>> tend to get waves in the route.
>>>>
>>>> The router table is a Sears router table to which I attache a standard
>>>> router. The fence is only about 18". I use a one piece fence with an
>>>> opening for the bit. I have had good results using this technique with
>>>> frames as long as 40 inches.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that the same technique may work when joining.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just FYI...It's jointing, not joining.
>>
>> I think it is joining.
>
> I'm pretty sure it's jointing
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jointer
> http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?cat=1&p=41801
>
>
>>
No, it us a little confusing. A jointer is a machine, what Lee Valley is
selling. The apparatus. To prepaid and join., is joining. :-)
>>>
>>> When jointing on a router table, you don't want pressure on the in-feed
>>> fence.
>>
>> Well, yes you do, until you have enough on the out feed side to apply
>> pressure to and not both at the same time.
>
> Right. My problem is that with a 36" board, there is more time spent on
> the out-feed side than the in-feed side. What is your definition of "enough"
> on the out feed side? If I switch to putting pressure on the out-feed fence
> after 12" or even 18" I still have to move my hands at least once or I'll
> run out of fence or table from a "hand position" perspective. That's when
> my bump occurs.
>
> https://i.imgur.com/hjSOHrP.jpg
>
>
>>
>> All pressure should be on the out-feed fence which is supposed
>>> to be proud of the in-feed fence and flush with the cutting surface of
>>> the bit. See here:
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>
>>
>> He acknowledges my comment above, pressure on the in feed to begin.
>
> No argument there. I'll agree that I wasn't clear when I talked about
> "no pressure on the in-feed fence". Obviously, you need pressure on the
> in_feed fence at the start of the feed.
>
It's hard enough on a small jointer. Settings have to be perfect. And as
with most anything where you provide the fed rate an inconsistent feed
rate results is an inconsistent result. Practice eventually makes perfect.
My hat is off to you for giving this a try but, as you now see, this is not
as easy as it appears.
DerbyDad03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:38:29 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>> On 1/13/2018 5:37 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:55:47 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On 1/13/2018 4:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>> movement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>
>>>> I have not joined on a router, but frequently use the router to create
>>>> profiles on picture frames. I have found that I get the best results
>>>> using feather boards on the in fed and out feed ends of the router.
>>>> This then keeps the piece firmly against the fence on both sides to the
>>>> bit for the length of the piece. With the fence I only have to keep the
>>>> piece flat against the table, which I fine easier that trying to keep it
>>>> against the fence and the table. Without the feather board I find the I
>>>> tend to get waves in the route.
>>>>
>>>> The router table is a Sears router table to which I attache a standard
>>>> router. The fence is only about 18". I use a one piece fence with an
>>>> opening for the bit. I have had good results using this technique with
>>>> frames as long as 40 inches.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that the same technique may work when joining.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just FYI...It's jointing, not joining.
>>
>> I think it is joining.
>
> I'm pretty sure it's jointing
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jointer
> http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?cat=1&p=41801
The tool is jointer. The
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> When jointing on a router table, you don't want pressure on the in-feed
>>> fence.
>>
>> Well, yes you do, until you have enough on the out feed side to apply
>> pressure to and not both at the same time.
>
> Right. My problem is that with a 36" board, there is more time spent on
> the out-feed side than the in-feed side. What is your definition of "enough"
> on the out feed side? If I switch to putting pressure on the out-feed fence
> after 12" or even 18" I still have to move my hands at least once or I'll
> run out of fence or table from a "hand position" perspective. That's when
> my bump occurs.
>
> https://i.imgur.com/hjSOHrP.jpg
>
>
>>
>> All pressure should be on the out-feed fence which is supposed
>>> to be proud of the in-feed fence and flush with the cutting surface of
>>> the bit. See here:
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>
>>
>> He acknowledges my comment above, pressure on the in feed to begin.
>
> No argument there. I'll agree that I wasn't clear when I talked about
> "no pressure on the in-feed fence". Obviously, you need pressure on the
> in_feed fence at the start of the feed.
>
DerbyDad03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:32:36 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>> On 1/13/2018 3:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>
>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>> movement.
>>>
>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>
>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>
>>
>> The fence offset MUST ABSOLUTELY BE SET EXACTLY to the the depth of the
>> cut.
>
> Yes, the out-feed fence is flush with the cutting surface of the bit.
>
>> Apply pressure to the in feed side until you have enough on the
>> out feed side that you can finish the pass.
>
> Yes, but my problem is on the out-feed side. While working on the
> out-feed side, any, *any* let-up in pressure against the fence causes the
> bump.
Yeah, even using a jointer is a learned talent. Using a router table
increases the difficulty because it does not compare to a jointer.
Theoretically you should be able to saw a board as accurately with a hand
saw as with a TS. See where I'm going here? :-). The less appropriate
the tool, the less you should expect.
>
>>
>> I can tell you how to do this on your TS, if you have a TS, and a scrap
>> piece of plywood that is 3+' long.
>
> Thanks, but I am aware of that method.
>
On Monday, January 15, 2018 at 10:16:23 AM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
> "DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Monday, January 15, 2018 at 8:28:15 AM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
> >> "DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> > On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 1:56:44 PM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
> >>
> >> >> There is no need to, left hand holds the work against the outfeed
> >> >> fence, right hand moves it along. Now, if the work were much more
> >> >> than
> >> >> 36"
> >> >> long, you would have to move your right hand but not your left; no
> >> >> matter,
> >> >> left is still holding it where it should be.
> >> >
> >> > I just changed my feed method and hand positions. I did not change my
> >> > fences.
> >> > I was able to joint a 36" board without any bumps.
> >> >
> >> > I was previously holding the board down and against fence with both
> >> > hands
> >> > on the out-feed side. Even tried paddles. This time, partially based on
> >> > your wording, I installed a feather board to hold the board down and
> >> > placed
> >> > my left hand on the table, keeping pressure on outside edge of the
> >> > board
> >> > to
> >> > hold it against the out-feed table while moving it with my right.
> >> > Perfectly
> >> > jointed edge.
> >>
> >> YAY!. As a refinement, you don't need the featherboard, your left hand
> >> can
> >> easily hold it both in and down.
> >
> > Belt and suspenders. Easily attached, provides peace of mind.
> >
> >>
> >> There remains the reason behind your bumps. Even holding it as you
> >> described, there should have been none. For a bump to arise, the board
> >> has
> >> to have slightly moved away from the bit, then moved laterally, then
> >> returned to the bit.
> >
> > Exactly - as previously stated very early in this thread.
> >
> >> The simplest explanation is that there was a fulcrum;
> >> ie, the fence halves were not parallel.
> >
> > I'm not sure why you keep going back to the fences. In the post you just
> > responded to I stated that I did not have to adjust the fences to
> > eliminate
> > the bumps. It was all caused by improper hand positioning.
>
> Because if the fences were parallel and you kept the work against the fence
> when changing hands you should not have made a bump. If they were NOT
> parallel there would be a fulcrum; if you applied greater/lesser pressure
> toward the fence on the work piece on one side or the other of the fulcrum,
> you'd get a bump; if you applied pressure correctly, no bump even if the
> fences were less than parallel.
>
> IOW, holding as you did should not cause a bump.
Do you know how I was holding it when the bumps were created vs. how I
modified the holding process?
It should be painfully obvious by now that fences are/were fine based on the
fact that I have repeatedly said (and if I ever wanted to post in all caps,
this would be the time) I am now able to get a perfectly jointed edge without
ever having changed the positioning of the fences.
If the fences were part of the problem I seriously doubt that I would have
been able to eliminate the bumps simply my changing the feed method/hand
positions.
Please stop bringing the fences into this situation. I'm not saying that a
fence mis-alignment wouldn't cause this problem, I'm saying that the fences
(imagine all caps again) were not a factor in this specific case.
>
> >> The other explanation is that you
> >> were physically moving the work to create the bump.
> >
> > See your "For a bump to arise" sentence above. Also, that fact was
> > previously
> > stated very early in this thread.
> >
> >> In either case, I'd
> >> think the problem would be immediately obvious. Why wasn't it?
> >
> > It was. Why do you think I started this thread?
>
> I should have said, "In either case, I'd think the SOLUTION would be
> immediately obvious."
On Monday, January 15, 2018 at 8:28:15 AM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
> "DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 1:56:44 PM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
>
> >> There is no need to, left hand holds the work against the outfeed
> >> fence, right hand moves it along. Now, if the work were much more than
> >> 36"
> >> long, you would have to move your right hand but not your left; no
> >> matter,
> >> left is still holding it where it should be.
> >
> > I just changed my feed method and hand positions. I did not change my
> > fences.
> > I was able to joint a 36" board without any bumps.
> >
> > I was previously holding the board down and against fence with both hands
> > on the out-feed side. Even tried paddles. This time, partially based on
> > your wording, I installed a feather board to hold the board down and
> > placed
> > my left hand on the table, keeping pressure on outside edge of the board
> > to
> > hold it against the out-feed table while moving it with my right.
> > Perfectly
> > jointed edge.
>
> YAY!. As a refinement, you don't need the featherboard, your left hand can
> easily hold it both in and down.
Belt and suspenders. Easily attached, provides peace of mind.
>
> There remains the reason behind your bumps. Even holding it as you
> described, there should have been none. For a bump to arise, the board has
> to have slightly moved away from the bit, then moved laterally, then
> returned to the bit.
Exactly - as previously stated very early in this thread.
> The simplest explanation is that there was a fulcrum;
> ie, the fence halves were not parallel.
I'm not sure why you keep going back to the fences. In the post you just
responded to I stated that I did not have to adjust the fences to eliminate
the bumps. It was all caused by improper hand positioning.
> The other explanation is that you
> were physically moving the work to create the bump.
See your "For a bump to arise" sentence above. Also, that fact was previously
stated very early in this thread.
> In either case, I'd
> think the problem would be immediately obvious. Why wasn't it?
It was. Why do you think I started this thread?
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> > the in-feed fence.
> >
> > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> > movement.
> >
> > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >
> > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>
> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>
> Best of luck.
Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different manner.
http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 11:02:08 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote:
> On 1/13/2018 9:43 PM, Michael wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 9:06:05 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
> >> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> >>>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> >>>>>>> the in-feed fence.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> >>>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> >>>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> >>>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> >>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> >>>>>>> movement.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> >>>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best of luck.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
> >>>>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
> >>>>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
> >>>>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
> >>>>
> >>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
> >>>
> >>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
> >>>
> >>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
> >>> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
> >>
> >> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
> >>
> >>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
> >>
> >> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
> >>
> >>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
> >>> that is buttery smooth.
> >>
> >> Not the best for a glue up.
> >
> > I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when clamping.
> >
>
> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue is
> not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in the
> joint. Tooth marks create gaps.
> Additionally there is a lot of back and forth talk on starving a joint
> by squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation as it is often called is
> when there is no or not enough glue on the surface to begin with not
> because you had squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was too
> much glue in the joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you
> have no indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint
> fail because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is almost
> invisible.
Thanks for the info on this. I think was Norm who once talked about not clamping too hard because it would squeeze all the glue out of a joint. I've always kept that in the back of my mind.
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 12:20:24 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
> On 1/13/2018 11:17 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> > On 1/13/18 10:15 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:05:06 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03=20
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-5,
> >>> [email protected] wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03=20
> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6,
> >>>>>>>> DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router
> >>>>>>>>> table so I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long.
> >>>>>>>>> I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed
> >>>>>>>>> fence.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on
> >>>>>>>>> the out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even
> >>>>>>>>> pressure as I move the board along. At 36" long I have
> >>>>>>>>> to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the
> >>>>>>>>> jointed edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the
> >>>>>>>>> table on the out-feed side, but I'm still getting 2-3
> >>>>>>>>> bumps on the jointed edge because of hand movement.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
> >>>>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the
> >>>>>>>>> problem?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a
> >>>>>>>>> gap free glue-up?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight
> >>>>>>>> edge to the top of the board and running a router along
> >>>>>>>> the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to
> >>>>>>>> try using the router table for this purpose.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best of luck.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However,
> >>>>>>> jointing on a router table is fairly common. I suspect my
> >>>>>>> long boards relative to the fence may be the issue. I'm
> >>>>>>> fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just a little
> >>>>>>> less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router
> >>>>>>> table.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DH6nql7mlSOo
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw
> >>>>>> rips?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this
> >>>>> process:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square 2 -
> >>>>> Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against
> >>>>> the fence
> >>>>
> >>>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
> >>>>
> >>>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw
> >>>>> marks.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope.=C2=A0 No saw marks needed.=C2=A0 See 2a (above).
> >>>>
> >>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
> >>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
> >>>>
> >>>> Not the best for a glue up.
> >>>
> >>> So you're saying that jointing with a router should be avoided?
> >>
> >> No, just that a table saw, properly set up, is good enough.
> >>
> >>> Why are there so many articles and videos from so many sources
> >>> detailing the technique?
> >>
> >> I have no idea.=C2=A0 Maybe because if all you have a hammer, the enti=
re=20
> >> world looks like a screw?
> >>
> >> However, the point I was trying to make was that a glass-like
> >> surface may not be best for a (wood) glue joint.
> >>
> >=20
> > There are so many articles because people don't have decent table saws
> > nor blades.
> > He's right.=C2=A0 A great rip blade and properly tuned table saw are al=
l you
> > need.
>=20
> yeah!
>
=20
I just "jointed" some boards with a freshly sharpened 24 tooth rip blade.=
=20
When "joined", the "joints" look good. ;-)
I'm going to go with them for the ~18" wide top for my base cabinets. 2=20
seams. They will be screwed to supports inside the cabinet (and painted)=20
so if the joints ever fail, the panels will be easy to replace.
It's a learning experience.
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 4:14:12 PM UTC-6, Sonny wrote:
>
> I'm suspecting your fences are not in line, on the same plane, parallel.... hence the "wobble" in the motion of the run through the cutter, i.e., it's not the movement of your hands or hands' position.
There's a technique for making a curved edge (an arch), using the jointer: Lower the outfeed table, hence, you get an arced/arched edge. This seems to be similar to what you are experiencing, but you are blaming it on your hand-movement positions.
Check that your fences are coplanar.
Sonny
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:55:47 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> On 1/13/2018 4:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> > the in-feed fence.
> >
> > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> > movement.
> >
> > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >
> > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >
> I have not joined on a router, but frequently use the router to create
> profiles on picture frames. I have found that I get the best results
> using feather boards on the in fed and out feed ends of the router.
> This then keeps the piece firmly against the fence on both sides to the
> bit for the length of the piece. With the fence I only have to keep the
> piece flat against the table, which I fine easier that trying to keep it
> against the fence and the table. Without the feather board I find the I
> tend to get waves in the route.
>
> The router table is a Sears router table to which I attache a standard
> router. The fence is only about 18". I use a one piece fence with an
> opening for the bit. I have had good results using this technique with
> frames as long as 40 inches.
>
> I suspect that the same technique may work when joining.
>
Just FYI...It's jointing, not joining.
When jointing on a router table, you don't want pressure on the in-feed
fence. All pressure should be on the out-feed fence which is supposed
to be proud of the in-feed fence and flush with the cutting surface of
the bit. See here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
On 1/13/2018 6:21 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>> movement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>
>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>
>>>> Best of luck.
>>>
>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>
>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>
>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>
>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>
> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>
> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
yes
> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
yes
> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
NO! This introduces error, the same you are having problems with. If
you have tooth marks you need to set you saw up better and or be using a
better blade. Joining the opposite side after the rip can cause the
board to taper.
>
> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
> that is buttery smooth.
>
On 1/13/2018 5:37 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:55:47 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>> On 1/13/2018 4:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>
>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>> movement.
>>>
>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>
>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>
>> I have not joined on a router, but frequently use the router to create
>> profiles on picture frames. I have found that I get the best results
>> using feather boards on the in fed and out feed ends of the router.
>> This then keeps the piece firmly against the fence on both sides to the
>> bit for the length of the piece. With the fence I only have to keep the
>> piece flat against the table, which I fine easier that trying to keep it
>> against the fence and the table. Without the feather board I find the I
>> tend to get waves in the route.
>>
>> The router table is a Sears router table to which I attache a standard
>> router. The fence is only about 18". I use a one piece fence with an
>> opening for the bit. I have had good results using this technique with
>> frames as long as 40 inches.
>>
>> I suspect that the same technique may work when joining.
>>
>
> Just FYI...It's jointing, not joining.
I think it is joining.
>
> When jointing on a router table, you don't want pressure on the in-feed
> fence.
Well, yes you do, until you have enough on the out feed side to apply
pressure to and not both at the same time.
All pressure should be on the out-feed fence which is supposed
> to be proud of the in-feed fence and flush with the cutting surface of
> the bit. See here:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>
He acknowledges my comment above, pressure on the in feed to begin.
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 1:56:44 PM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
> "DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> > the in-feed fence.
> >
> > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> > movement.
> >
> > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >
> > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>
> Since you want to think that your holding method is at fault rather than
> your fence haves not being parallel, let me suggest that you not move your
> hands.
Hearing and vision were enough to prove to me that the issue was my holding
method.
The fact that I just perfectly jointed a board that fit within the fence
width, requiring no need for me to move my hands along the stock, convinces
me all the more.
> There is no need to, left hand holds the work against the outfeed
> fence, right hand moves it along. Now, if the work were much more than 36"
> long, you would have to move your right hand but not your left; no matter,
> left is still holding it where it should be.
I just changed my feed method and hand positions. I did not change my fences.
I was able to joint a 36" board without any bumps.
I was previously holding the board down and against fence with both hands
on the out-feed side. Even tried paddles. This time, partially based on
your wording, I installed a feather board to hold the board down and placed
my left hand on the table, keeping pressure on outside edge of the board to
hold it against the out-feed table while moving it with my right. Perfectly
jointed edge.
>
> Trust me, all is true, been doing it that way for more than 30 years.
Bottom line is that it wasn't that I *wanted* to think my holding method
was at fault, it was 100% true that my holding method was at fault. There
was/is no issue with my fences.
Thanks for your suggestion regarding a different holding method.
DerbyDad03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:41:56 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>> On 1/13/2018 6:21 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>>>> movement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the
>>>>>> top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish
>>>>>> bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>>>>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>>>>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>>>>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>>>
>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>>
>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>>>
>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>>>
>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>>
>> yes
>>
>>> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>>
>> yes
>>
>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>>
>>
>> NO! This introduces error, the same you are having problems with.
>
> While the second pass may not be needed (more on that later) I don't see the
> connection between the second jointing pass and my problem. My problem is
> a pressure related problem that has nothing to do with a second pass. There
> doesn't even need to be table saw in the room for my problem to occur. ;-)
> I'm not even getting past Step 1.
Thanks for not making me explain that. :-). Inconsistent feed results in
inconsistent results. :-). Welcome to the AR club. :-)
Theoretically the router table and fence can do what you want to happen.
But every thing has to be perfect. And something, including possibly your
inexperience is affecting your out come. This will is a relatively
difficult task, it is not something you just do perfectly right off the
bat. Practice, practice, practice. Or use tour TS to get your straight
edge.
>
>> If
>> you have tooth marks you need to set you saw up better and or be using a
>> better blade. Joining the opposite side after the rip can cause the
>> board to taper.
>>>
>
> They talk about a very light pass in this thread:
>
> http://www.woodworkingtalk.com/f2/edge-jointing-both-sides-board-126194/
>
> I don't have a jointer (obviously) but how can a light pass cause the
> board to taper? Whether jointing on a router table or on a jointer, aren't
> you taking off the same amount of wood along the entire length of the board?
A TS And a surface planer both have fixed indexing surfaces. Your hands
are not a fixed surface. The rip fence on your TS and the table on a
planer are hard fixed reference surfaces. Those surfaces are a hard fixed
surface opposite the cutter. Your hands don't come close to providing an
absolute fixed surface opposite the cutter on a jointer or router bit. To
be accurate you have to remove variables. Your hand feed rate is a
constant variable.
>
>
>
On 1/14/2018 12:48 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 1/14/18 11:22 AM, Leon wrote:
>> On 1/13/2018 10:56 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:41:57 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so
>>>>>>> I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the
>>>>>>> out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the
>>>>>>> Â out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I
>>>>>>> move the board along. At 36" long I have to move my hands
>>>>>>> and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed edge. I tried to
>>>>>>> clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side, but I'm
>>>>>>> still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because
>>>>>>> of hand movement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
>>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap
>>>>>>> free glue-up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to
>>>>>> the top of the board and running a router along the side with
>>>>>> a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router
>>>>>> table for this purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different
>>>>> manner.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well.
>>>> I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to
>>>> get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
>>>
>>> Join the club! I'm sure I'm doing something wrong too.
>>>
>>
>> I can guarantee you that aluminum angle is not straight enough to
>> form a glue line surface.
>
> It's only straight if it's attached to something straight.  :-)
> I think in the article in the link, it's attached to a straight board
> and hopefully triple checked. I believe the aluminum is there to give
> the router bit bearing a hard, smooth surface to reference.
>
>
Yeah, and what are the chances of that board staying straight through
out the year. Probably a better choice would have been to use a
straight piece of plywood. LOL. I think the aluminum would dent or
nick pretty easily.
On 1/14/2018 1:13 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
Snip
>>
>
> I just "jointed" some boards with a freshly sharpened 24 tooth rip blade.
> When "joined", the "joints" look good. ;-)
>
> I'm going to go with them for the ~18" wide top for my base cabinets. 2
> seams. They will be screwed to supports inside the cabinet (and painted)
> so if the joints ever fail, the panels will be easy to replace.
>
> It's a learning experience.
>
If you are going cross grain with your supports leave the screw holes a
little big to give the wood some wiggle room during seasonal climate
changes.
Your joints should not fail... ;~)
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >> > > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >> > > > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> >> > > > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> >> > > > the in-feed fence.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> >> > > > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> >> > > > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> >> > > > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> >> > > > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> >> > > > movement.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> >> > > > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >> > >
> >> > > I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
> >> > >
> >> > > Best of luck.
> >> >
> >> > That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
> >> > table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
> >> > may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
> >> > a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
> >> >
> >> > https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
> >> >
> >> > See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
> >> >
> >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
> >>
> >> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
> >
> >It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
> >
> >1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
> >2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>
> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>
> >3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>
> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>
> >My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
> >that is buttery smooth.
>
> Not the best for a glue up.
So you're saying that jointing with a router should be avoided?
Why are there so many articles and videos from so many sources detailing the technique?
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 9:06:05 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >> > > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >> > > > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> >> > > > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> >> > > > the in-feed fence.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> >> > > > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> >> > > > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> >> > > > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> >> > > > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> >> > > > movement.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> >> > > > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >> > >
> >> > > I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
> >> > >
> >> > > Best of luck.
> >> >
> >> > That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
> >> > table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
> >> > may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
> >> > a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
> >> >
> >> > https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
> >> >
> >> > See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
> >> >
> >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
> >>
> >> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
> >
> >It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
> >
> >1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
> >2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>
> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>
> >3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>
> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>
> >My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
> >that is buttery smooth.
>
> Not the best for a glue up.
I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when clamping.
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:48:33 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 1/14/18 11:22 AM, Leon wrote:
>> On 1/13/2018 10:56 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:41:57 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so
>>>>>>> I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the
>>>>>>> out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the
>>>>>>> out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I
>>>>>>> move the board along. At 36" long I have to move my hands
>>>>>>> and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed edge. I tried to
>>>>>>> clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because
>>>>>>> of hand movement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
>>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap
>>>>>>> free glue-up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to
>>>>>> the top of the board and running a router along the side with
>>>>>> a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router
>>>>>> table for this purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different
>>>>> manner.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well.
>>>> I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to
>>>> get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
>>>
>>> Join the club! I'm sure I'm doing something wrong too.
>>>
>>
>> I can guarantee you that aluminum angle is not straight enough to
>> form a glue line surface.
>
>It's only straight if it's attached to something straight. :-)
>I think in the article in the link, it's attached to a straight board
>and hopefully triple checked. I believe the aluminum is there to give
>the router bit bearing a hard, smooth surface to reference.
But why does the bearing need a surface harder than a board. It's not
very sharp. ;-)
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 1:34:32 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
> DerbyDad03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:38:29 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
> >> On 1/13/2018 5:37 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:55:47 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> >>>> On 1/13/2018 4:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> >>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> >>>>> the in-feed fence.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> >>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> >>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> >>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> >>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> >>>>> movement.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> >>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >>>>>
> >>>> I have not joined on a router, but frequently use the router to create
> >>>> profiles on picture frames. I have found that I get the best results
> >>>> using feather boards on the in fed and out feed ends of the router.
> >>>> This then keeps the piece firmly against the fence on both sides to the
> >>>> bit for the length of the piece. With the fence I only have to keep the
> >>>> piece flat against the table, which I fine easier that trying to keep it
> >>>> against the fence and the table. Without the feather board I find the I
> >>>> tend to get waves in the route.
> >>>>
> >>>> The router table is a Sears router table to which I attache a standard
> >>>> router. The fence is only about 18". I use a one piece fence with an
> >>>> opening for the bit. I have had good results using this technique with
> >>>> frames as long as 40 inches.
> >>>>
> >>>> I suspect that the same technique may work when joining.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Just FYI...It's jointing, not joining.
> >>
> >> I think it is joining.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure it's jointing
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jointer
> > http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?cat=1&p=41801
> >
> >
> >>
> No, it us a little confusing. A jointer is a machine, what Lee Valley is
> selling. The apparatus. To prepaid and join., is joining. :-)
By "prepaid", I assume you mean "prepare". If that's the case, I have to
respectfully disagree.
Maybe we aren't talking about the same thing or using the words in the
same context. I was responding to Keith's comments, which involve the
preparation step only.
First he said: "I have not joined on a router"
Then, after discusses his use of feathers boards on the in-feed and out-feed
side he said "I suspect that the same technique may work when joining."
Therefore he is talking about the preparation of the edges only. As far as
I can tell from everything I've read, the preparation step is called jointing.
From the same Veritas page:
"One of the great advantages of the Veritas router table fence is that it makes jointing easy." Jointing, as in the process, not the apparatus.
From (if you trust wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_jointing
Here they discuss both the preparation process (jointing), the apparatus
(jointer) and the subsequent operation of putting the components together
(joining).
"Edge jointing or just jointing is the process of making the edge of a wooden
board straight and true in preparation for subsequent operations, often
ultimately leading to joining two or more components together. Traditionally,
jointing was performed using a jointer plane. Modern techniques include the
use of a jointer machine, a hand held router and straight edge, or a table-
mounted router. Although the process derives its name from the primary task of
straightening an edge prior to joining, the term jointing is used whenever
this process is performed, regardless of the application."
From: http://www.finewoodworking.com/2014/02/19/jointing-boards-for-dead-flat-panel-glue-ups
The title of article and video is "Jointing Boards for Dead-Flat Panel
Glue-Ups"
I could go on. Everything I can find refers to the process of prepping the
board as jointing. Then you join them, creating a joint.
I am certainly willing to admit being wrong, but then so must be all the
sources that use the term jointing for the preparation process.
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:54:31 PM UTC-6, Sonny wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:31:12 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>=20
> >=20
> > When jointing on a router table, the fences are *supposed* to be mis-al=
igned.
>=20
> Correct!
>=20
> > The out-feed fence is supposed to be about 1/16" closer to the operator=
than
> > the in-feed fence.
>=20
> Correct!
>=20
> > The bit is then aligned flush with the face of the out-feed
> > fence.
>=20
> Correct!
>=20
> I'm suspecting the two fences, outfeed and infeed, are not parallel, desp=
ite their being offset. They are not exactly coplanar. They need to be =
offset and they also need to be perfectly coplanar.
>=20
> I suspect your hand movement is giving you a misjudged idea of why you ar=
e having the bump. It's not your hand movement that's the (main, if at al=
l) problem. Check to make sure your fences are coplanar, despite their bei=
ng offset.
>=20
> Sonny
As to a dedicated jointer, both infeed and outfeed tables are normally para=
llel to one another. They need to be perfectly parallel. They are also o=
ffset, depending on how much wood thickness one wants to remove, and the in=
feed table is lowered by that much.
With the outfeed table lowered well below the infeed table (and cutter head=
), one can purposely joint an arch, along the edge. In this case, the tabl=
es still remain coplanar. =20
The arch can also be done if the back end of the outfeed table is lowered r=
elative to the front end, i.e., angled, hence, the two tables are no longer=
coplanar, since the outfeed has been angled. This technique is rarely us=
ed, except for larger than "normal" arches, because it's sometimes difficul=
t to realign the table, perfectly parallel, to the infeed table. Once set=
, one should not mess with the alignment (coplanar) of the tables.
Again, check that your fences are coplanar, despite their being offset. W=
hatever straight edge you use for this gauging, double check that its edge =
is, in fact, straight. ....and the offset is what it's suppose to be all =
along the whole length of the outfeed fence, relative to the infeed fence. =
Relative to the infeed fence, if the offset is not the same all along the=
full length of the outfeed fence, then your fences are not coplanar.
Sonny
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:41:56 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
> On 1/13/2018 6:21 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> >>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> >>>>> the in-feed fence.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> >>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> >>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> >>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> >>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> >>>>> movement.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> >>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >>>>
> >>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best of luck.
> >>>
> >>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
> >>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
> >>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
> >>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
> >>>
> >>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
> >>>
> >>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
> >>
> >> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
> >
> > It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
> >
> > 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>
> yes
>
> > 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>
> yes
>
> > 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>
>
> NO! This introduces error, the same you are having problems with.
While the second pass may not be needed (more on that later) I don't see the
connection between the second jointing pass and my problem. My problem is
a pressure related problem that has nothing to do with a second pass. There
doesn't even need to be table saw in the room for my problem to occur. ;-)
I'm not even getting past Step 1.
> If
> you have tooth marks you need to set you saw up better and or be using a
> better blade. Joining the opposite side after the rip can cause the
> board to taper.
> >
They talk about a very light pass in this thread:
http://www.woodworkingtalk.com/f2/edge-jointing-both-sides-board-126194/
I don't have a jointer (obviously) but how can a light pass cause the
board to taper? Whether jointing on a router table or on a jointer, aren't
you taking off the same amount of wood along the entire length of the board?
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> > the in-feed fence.
> >
> > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> > movement.
> >
> > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >
> > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>
> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>
> Best of luck.
That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> >> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
> >> >>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
> >> >>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Not the best for a glue up.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak
> >> >>> up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when
> >> >>> clamping.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue
> >> >> is not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in
> >> >> the joint. Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of
> >> >> back and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it.
> >> >> Glue starvation as it is often called is when there is no or not
> >> >> enough glue on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze
> >> >> out. You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
> >> >> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have no
> >> >> indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
> >> >> because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
> >> >> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is
> >> >> almost invisible.
> >> >
> >> >Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and those are
> >> >three of them.
> >> >Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
> >>
> >> Try it with glass.
> >
> >Apples and Gorillas
>
> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to this thread and
get back to the actual issue.
Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a straight router
bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too smooth for Titebond III
to perform its designed task?
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:35:01 PM UTC-5, whit3rd wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:22:14 PM UTC-8, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>
> > Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a straight router
> > bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too smooth for Titebond III
> > to perform its designed task?f
>
> Yes, there may be something to that. A blunt (carbide) bit both cuts and slightly
> crushes the wood as it passes. That crushing closes the ends of the wood
> fiber, and makes glues less effective.
In my case, it's a brand new Whiteside bit. Right out the case and into the "jointer"/router.
>
> For high quality veneering (and plywood) the surface quality from an
> acute (low-angle) plane, or from light sanding, is preferred for glue
> bond. D-day gliders, manufactured in quantity, were all sandpapered
> before assembly and glue-up.
>
> Titebond recommends acetone wipe for oily woods, and
> " A good bonding surface can also be achieved by sanding or planing the wood just before gluing the joints."
> but there's no harm applying the same advice to poplar.
They also say, regarding oily woods (which I don't believe poplar to be):
"For either type of wood, planing, jointing, or sanding shortly before bonding will remove the
contaminating layer and allow successful bonding." The use of acetone says "otherwise"
meaning if not jointed shortly before bonding.
I'm sure my router jointed edges are going to be just fine.
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:22:14 PM UTC-8, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a straight router
> bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too smooth for Titebond III
> to perform its designed task?
Yes, there may be something to that. A blunt (carbide) bit both cuts and slightly
crushes the wood as it passes. That crushing closes the ends of the wood
fiber, and makes glues less effective.
For high quality veneering (and plywood) the surface quality from an
acute (low-angle) plane, or from light sanding, is preferred for glue
bond. D-day gliders, manufactured in quantity, were all sandpapered
before assembly and glue-up.
Titebond recommends acetone wipe for oily woods, and
" A good bonding surface can also be achieved by sanding or planing the wood just before gluing the joints."
but there's no harm applying the same advice to poplar.
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:50:52 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 1/14/18 9:16 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 9:41:58 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
> >> On 1/14/18 8:22 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5,
> >>> [email protected] wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5,
> >>>>> [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE-
> >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my
> >>>>>>>>>>> router table leaves a edge that is buttery
> >>>>>>>>>>> smooth.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth
> >>>>>>>>> surface won't soak up the glue as well and you could
> >>>>>>>>> squeeze out too much when clamping.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical
> >>>>>>>> yellow/wood glue is not a good gap filler and works
> >>>>>>>> best with a minimum of product in the joint. Tooth
> >>>>>>>> marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of back
> >>>>>>>> and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue
> >>>>>>>> out of it. Glue starvation as it is often called is
> >>>>>>>> when there is no or not enough glue on the surface to
> >>>>>>>> begin with not because you had squeeze out. You get
> >>>>>>>> squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
> >>>>>>>> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you
> >>>>>>>> have no indicator that the joint is tight. I have never
> >>>>>>>> had a joint fail because of too much clamping pressure
> >>>>>>>> and causing too much glue to squeeze out. Remember, a
> >>>>>>>> quality glue joint line is one that is almost
> >>>>>>>> invisible.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking
> >>>>>>> and those are three of them. Glue doesn't "bite" and
> >>>>>>> holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Try it with glass.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Apples and Gorillas
> >>>>
> >>>> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
> >>>
> >>> OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to this
> >>> thread and get back to the actual issue.
> >>>
> >>> Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a
> >>> straight router bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too
> >>> smooth for Titebond III to perform its designed task?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I don't know what he's saying, but I'll say no. Some advice,
> >> though. You'd be amazed at how much smoother (smaller "bumps") a
> >> surface you get with a larger diameter bit at a higher speed and
> >> slower feed rate with the stock.
> >>
> >> I suppose someone could do the math, but I'm sure you can picture
> >> that the larger the diameter of the cutter head, the larger the
> >> radius of the cut, meaning fewer and smoother "bumps."
> >>
> >> In ANY case! Many times, when using a jointer (JOINER!, nor
> >> wait! JOINTER! No, no, it's joinyerterner!) or router, I am often
> >> in the habit of "planing" the edge surfaces with light passes of
> >> 100-120 grit with a hard surface sanding pad (block of wood) if I'm
> >> dissatisfied with the smoothness of the surface.
> >>
> >> I RARELY do that when said surfaces are to be glued together. And
> >> have never done so when using the table saw and rip blade to prep
> >> the boards to be glued together.
> >>
> >
> > I'm making 2 panels from 1 x stock. Each will have 2 seams. Each will
> > see more or less the same use/abuse since they will both be used as
> > tops for the base cabinets for the bookcase project. (similar to
> > yours)
> >
> > I already glued up one panel with boards jointed with a 24 tooth rip
> > blade.
> >
> > I then figured out what I was doing wrong with my hands and jointed 3
> > other boards with a 1/2" straight bit on my router table. I'll be
> > gluing up that panel tomorrow.
> >
> > I will mark the underside of each panel as to the jointing method
> > used. I will do my best to remember to revive this thread if either
> > of the panels fail during my lifetime.
> >
> > By that time I'll probably be able to post a hologram version of the
> > failed joint image that I'll create with the MRI machine that I'll
> > build with my 3D printer array.
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izQB2-Kmiic
> >
>
> Haha! Please don't pay too much attention to the people trying to make
> rocket surgery out of this.
> IIRC, you were joining two 9" wide boards to make 18", correct?
> If I were worried about anything, I would be worried about cupping on
> those panels.
> I would rather join four 4.5" boards than two 9" ones.
>
Two 7.5" and one 5.5" board to be trimmed down to ~18". But, and this is
a big but...
Here is a close up of one of the 7.25" boards:
https://i.imgur.com/YLE37pH.jpg
The boards are already edge glued, consisting of random 3/4" to ~2" strips.
A local lumber yard carries them as "paint grade" boards, at a much lower
cost than clear poplar. They are dead flat and the joints are so tight the
only way that they are visible is because of the change in grain.
I spoke to a couple of contractors that frequent the lumber yard and they
can't say enough good things about these boards. We'll see.
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 9:41:58 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 1/14/18 8:22 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5, [email protected]
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5, [email protected]
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE-
> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router
> >>>>>>>>> table leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface
> >>>>>>> won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out
> >>>>>>> too much when clamping.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical
> >>>>>> yellow/wood glue is not a good gap filler and works best
> >>>>>> with a minimum of product in the joint. Tooth marks create
> >>>>>> gaps. Additionally there is a lot of back and forth talk on
> >>>>>> starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it. Glue
> >>>>>> starvation as it is often called is when there is no or
> >>>>>> not enough glue on the surface to begin with not because
> >>>>>> you had squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was
> >>>>>> too much glue in the joint to begin with. If you don't get
> >>>>>> squeeze out you have no indicator that the joint is tight.
> >>>>>> I have never had a joint fail because of too much clamping
> >>>>>> pressure and causing too much glue to squeeze out.
> >>>>>> Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is almost
> >>>>>> invisible.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and
> >>>>> those are three of them. Glue doesn't "bite" and holds
> >>>>> perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
> >>>>
> >>>> Try it with glass.
> >>>
> >>> Apples and Gorillas
> >>
> >> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
> >
> > OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to this thread
> > and get back to the actual issue.
> >
> > Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a straight
> > router bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too smooth for
> > Titebond III to perform its designed task?
> >
>
> I don't know what he's saying, but I'll say no.
> Some advice, though.
> You'd be amazed at how much smoother (smaller "bumps") a surface you get
> with a larger diameter bit at a higher speed and slower feed rate with
> the stock.
>
> I suppose someone could do the math, but I'm sure you can picture that
> the larger the diameter of the cutter head, the larger the radius of the
> cut, meaning fewer and smoother "bumps."
>
> In ANY case! Many times, when using a jointer (JOINER!, nor wait!
> JOINTER! No, no, it's joinyerterner!) or router, I am often in the
> habit of "planing" the edge surfaces with light passes of 100-120 grit
> with a hard surface sanding pad (block of wood) if I'm dissatisfied with
> the smoothness of the surface.
>
> I RARELY do that when said surfaces are to be glued together.
> And have never done so when using the table saw and rip blade to prep
> the boards to be glued together.
>
I'm making 2 panels from 1 x stock. Each will have 2 seams. Each will see more
or less the same use/abuse since they will both be used as tops for the base
cabinets for the bookcase project. (similar to yours)
I already glued up one panel with boards jointed with a 24 tooth rip blade.
I then figured out what I was doing wrong with my hands and jointed 3 other
boards with a 1/2" straight bit on my router table. I'll be gluing up that
panel tomorrow.
I will mark the underside of each panel as to the jointing method used. I
will do my best to remember to revive this thread if either of the panels
fail during my lifetime.
By that time I'll probably be able to post a hologram version of the
failed joint image that I'll create with the MRI machine that I'll build
with my 3D printer array.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izQB2-Kmiic
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 1/14/18 10:28 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:50:52 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
> >> On 1/14/18 9:16 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 9:41:58 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
> >>>> On 1/14/18 8:22 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5,
> >>>>> [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5,
> >>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE-
> >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> my router table leaves a edge that is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> buttery smooth.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth
> >>>>>>>>>>> surface won't soak up the glue as well and you
> >>>>>>>>>>> could squeeze out too much when clamping.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical
> >>>>>>>>>> yellow/wood glue is not a good gap filler and
> >>>>>>>>>> works best with a minimum of product in the joint.
> >>>>>>>>>> Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a
> >>>>>>>>>> lot of back and forth talk on starving a joint by
> >>>>>>>>>> squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation as it is
> >>>>>>>>>> often called is when there is no or not enough glue
> >>>>>>>>>> on the surface to begin with not because you had
> >>>>>>>>>> squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was
> >>>>>>>>>> too much glue in the joint to begin with. If you
> >>>>>>>>>> don't get squeeze out you have no indicator that
> >>>>>>>>>> the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
> >>>>>>>>>> because of too much clamping pressure and causing
> >>>>>>>>>> too much glue to squeeze out. Remember, a quality
> >>>>>>>>>> glue joint line is one that is almost invisible.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in
> >>>>>>>>> woodworking and those are three of them. Glue doesn't
> >>>>>>>>> "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth"
> >>>>>>>>> surface.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Try it with glass.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apples and Gorillas
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to
> >>>>> this thread and get back to the actual issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a
> >>>>> straight router bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is
> >>>>> too smooth for Titebond III to perform its designed task?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't know what he's saying, but I'll say no. Some advice,
> >>>> though. You'd be amazed at how much smoother (smaller "bumps")
> >>>> a surface you get with a larger diameter bit at a higher speed
> >>>> and slower feed rate with the stock.
> >>>>
> >>>> I suppose someone could do the math, but I'm sure you can
> >>>> picture that the larger the diameter of the cutter head, the
> >>>> larger the radius of the cut, meaning fewer and smoother
> >>>> "bumps."
> >>>>
> >>>> In ANY case! Many times, when using a jointer (JOINER!, nor
> >>>> wait! JOINTER! No, no, it's joinyerterner!) or router, I am
> >>>> often in the habit of "planing" the edge surfaces with light
> >>>> passes of 100-120 grit with a hard surface sanding pad (block
> >>>> of wood) if I'm dissatisfied with the smoothness of the
> >>>> surface.
> >>>>
> >>>> I RARELY do that when said surfaces are to be glued together.
> >>>> And have never done so when using the table saw and rip blade
> >>>> to prep the boards to be glued together.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm making 2 panels from 1 x stock. Each will have 2 seams. Each
> >>> will see more or less the same use/abuse since they will both be
> >>> used as tops for the base cabinets for the bookcase project.
> >>> (similar to yours)
> >>>
> >>> I already glued up one panel with boards jointed with a 24 tooth
> >>> rip blade.
> >>>
> >>> I then figured out what I was doing wrong with my hands and
> >>> jointed 3 other boards with a 1/2" straight bit on my router
> >>> table. I'll be gluing up that panel tomorrow.
> >>>
> >>> I will mark the underside of each panel as to the jointing
> >>> method used. I will do my best to remember to revive this thread
> >>> if either of the panels fail during my lifetime.
> >>>
> >>> By that time I'll probably be able to post a hologram version of
> >>> the failed joint image that I'll create with the MRI machine that
> >>> I'll build with my 3D printer array.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izQB2-Kmiic
> >>>
> >>
> >> Haha! Please don't pay too much attention to the people trying to
> >> make rocket surgery out of this. IIRC, you were joining two 9" wide
> >> boards to make 18", correct? If I were worried about anything, I
> >> would be worried about cupping on those panels. I would rather join
> >> four 4.5" boards than two 9" ones.
> >>
> >
> > Two 7.5" and one 5.5" board to be trimmed down to ~18". But, and this
> > is a big but...
> >
> > Here is a close up of one of the 7.25" boards:
> >
> > https://i.imgur.com/YLE37pH.jpg
> >
> > The boards are already edge glued, consisting of random 3/4" to ~2"
> > strips.
> >
> > A local lumber yard carries them as "paint grade" boards, at a much
> > lower cost than clear poplar. They are dead flat and the joints are
> > so tight the only way that they are visible is because of the change
> > in grain.
> >
> > I spoke to a couple of contractors that frequent the lumber yard and
> > they can't say enough good things about these boards. We'll see.
> >
>
> PFFT! Well, then we're already talking about glued up panels.
> Nothing to worry about. I used a bunch of those in pine a couple days
> ago and I use them all the time for wide shelf panels. I love them.
> They are very stable and a good way to save time.
>
Actually, what started me down this jointing and gluing path was the POS
pine panel that I bought at Lowes last week.
I think this is what I bought but it was shrink wrapped. (I tossed the
packaging and can't find the receipt right now.)
https://www.lowes.com/pd/Common-3-4-in-x-20-in-x-6-ft-Actual-0-62-in-x-19-25-in-x-6-ft-Pine-Board/50053137
It seemed to be perfectly flat in the store, but once I cross cut it in
half, it warped so fast I could almost watch it bend. ;-)
By the next morning one piece rocked diagonally corner to corner and
when I put the 2 halves face to face there's an ~3/32 gap at the center
of the 20" width. They look like this: ()
If Lowe's won't take it back with just the receipt, I've got $32 worth of
"quick burn" material for the fire pit.
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 11:09:05 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 1/14/18 10:00 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:35:01 PM UTC-5, whit3rd wrote:
> >> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:22:14 PM UTC-8, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>
> >>> Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a straight router
> >>> bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too smooth for Titebond III
> >>> to perform its designed task?f
> >>
> >> Yes, there may be something to that. A blunt (carbide) bit both cuts and slightly
> >> crushes the wood as it passes. That crushing closes the ends of the wood
> >> fiber, and makes glues less effective.
> >
> > In my case, it's a brand new Whiteside bit. Right out the case and into the "jointer"/router.
> >
> >>
> >> For high quality veneering (and plywood) the surface quality from an
> >> acute (low-angle) plane, or from light sanding, is preferred for glue
> >> bond. D-day gliders, manufactured in quantity, were all sandpapered
> >> before assembly and glue-up.
> >>
> >> Titebond recommends acetone wipe for oily woods, and
> >> " A good bonding surface can also be achieved by sanding or planing the wood just before gluing the joints."
> >> but there's no harm applying the same advice to poplar.
> >
> > They also say, regarding oily woods (which I don't believe poplar to be):
> >
> > "For either type of wood, planing, jointing, or sanding shortly before bonding will remove the
> > contaminating layer and allow successful bonding." The use of acetone says "otherwise"
> > meaning if not jointed shortly before bonding.
> >
> > I'm sure my router jointed edges are going to be just fine.
> >
>
> GEEZ! Poplar is not oily.
I was trying to be nice. ;-)
> Just get out of here and glue up your panels.
One down, one to go. MLK Day will be WW Day. I hope to get the face frames
done and to start working on the doors.
> Man, the old wives' tales have been coming back around this groups for
> decades.
>
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>> >>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
>> >>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>> >>>
>> >>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak
>> >>> up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when
>> >>> clamping.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue
>> >> is not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in
>> >> the joint. Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of
>> >> back and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it.
>> >> Glue starvation as it is often called is when there is no or not
>> >> enough glue on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze
>> >> out. You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
>> >> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have no
>> >> indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
>> >> because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
>> >> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is
>> >> almost invisible.
>> >
>> >Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and those are
>> >three of them.
>> >Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>>
>> Try it with glass.
>
>Apples and Gorillas
No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
On 1/14/18 8:22 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5, [email protected]
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5, [email protected]
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE-
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router
>>>>>>>>> table leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface
>>>>>>> won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out
>>>>>>> too much when clamping.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical
>>>>>> yellow/wood glue is not a good gap filler and works best
>>>>>> with a minimum of product in the joint. Tooth marks create
>>>>>> gaps. Additionally there is a lot of back and forth talk on
>>>>>> starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it. Glue
>>>>>> starvation as it is often called is when there is no or
>>>>>> not enough glue on the surface to begin with not because
>>>>>> you had squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was
>>>>>> too much glue in the joint to begin with. If you don't get
>>>>>> squeeze out you have no indicator that the joint is tight.
>>>>>> I have never had a joint fail because of too much clamping
>>>>>> pressure and causing too much glue to squeeze out.
>>>>>> Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is almost
>>>>>> invisible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and
>>>>> those are three of them. Glue doesn't "bite" and holds
>>>>> perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>>>>
>>>> Try it with glass.
>>>
>>> Apples and Gorillas
>>
>> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
>
> OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to this thread
> and get back to the actual issue.
>
> Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a straight
> router bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too smooth for
> Titebond III to perform its designed task?
>
I don't know what he's saying, but I'll say no.
Some advice, though.
You'd be amazed at how much smoother (smaller "bumps") a surface you get
with a larger diameter bit at a higher speed and slower feed rate with
the stock.
I suppose someone could do the math, but I'm sure you can picture that
the larger the diameter of the cutter head, the larger the radius of the
cut, meaning fewer and smoother "bumps."
In ANY case! Many times, when using a jointer (JOINER!, nor wait!
JOINTER! No, no, it's joinyerterner!) or router, I am often in the
habit of "planing" the edge surfaces with light passes of 100-120 grit
with a hard surface sanding pad (block of wood) if I'm dissatisfied with
the smoothness of the surface.
I RARELY do that when said surfaces are to be glued together.
And have never done so when using the table saw and rip blade to prep
the boards to be glued together.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 9:16 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 9:41:58 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 1/14/18 8:22 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5,
>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5,
>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE-
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my
>>>>>>>>>>> router table leaves a edge that is buttery
>>>>>>>>>>> smooth.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth
>>>>>>>>> surface won't soak up the glue as well and you could
>>>>>>>>> squeeze out too much when clamping.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical
>>>>>>>> yellow/wood glue is not a good gap filler and works
>>>>>>>> best with a minimum of product in the joint. Tooth
>>>>>>>> marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of back
>>>>>>>> and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue
>>>>>>>> out of it. Glue starvation as it is often called is
>>>>>>>> when there is no or not enough glue on the surface to
>>>>>>>> begin with not because you had squeeze out. You get
>>>>>>>> squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
>>>>>>>> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you
>>>>>>>> have no indicator that the joint is tight. I have never
>>>>>>>> had a joint fail because of too much clamping pressure
>>>>>>>> and causing too much glue to squeeze out. Remember, a
>>>>>>>> quality glue joint line is one that is almost
>>>>>>>> invisible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking
>>>>>>> and those are three of them. Glue doesn't "bite" and
>>>>>>> holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try it with glass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apples and Gorillas
>>>>
>>>> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
>>>
>>> OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to this
>>> thread and get back to the actual issue.
>>>
>>> Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a
>>> straight router bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too
>>> smooth for Titebond III to perform its designed task?
>>>
>>
>> I don't know what he's saying, but I'll say no. Some advice,
>> though. You'd be amazed at how much smoother (smaller "bumps") a
>> surface you get with a larger diameter bit at a higher speed and
>> slower feed rate with the stock.
>>
>> I suppose someone could do the math, but I'm sure you can picture
>> that the larger the diameter of the cutter head, the larger the
>> radius of the cut, meaning fewer and smoother "bumps."
>>
>> In ANY case! Many times, when using a jointer (JOINER!, nor
>> wait! JOINTER! No, no, it's joinyerterner!) or router, I am often
>> in the habit of "planing" the edge surfaces with light passes of
>> 100-120 grit with a hard surface sanding pad (block of wood) if I'm
>> dissatisfied with the smoothness of the surface.
>>
>> I RARELY do that when said surfaces are to be glued together. And
>> have never done so when using the table saw and rip blade to prep
>> the boards to be glued together.
>>
>
> I'm making 2 panels from 1 x stock. Each will have 2 seams. Each will
> see more or less the same use/abuse since they will both be used as
> tops for the base cabinets for the bookcase project. (similar to
> yours)
>
> I already glued up one panel with boards jointed with a 24 tooth rip
> blade.
>
> I then figured out what I was doing wrong with my hands and jointed 3
> other boards with a 1/2" straight bit on my router table. I'll be
> gluing up that panel tomorrow.
>
> I will mark the underside of each panel as to the jointing method
> used. I will do my best to remember to revive this thread if either
> of the panels fail during my lifetime.
>
> By that time I'll probably be able to post a hologram version of the
> failed joint image that I'll create with the MRI machine that I'll
> build with my 3D printer array.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izQB2-Kmiic
>
Haha! Please don't pay too much attention to the people trying to make
rocket surgery out of this.
IIRC, you were joining two 9" wide boards to make 18", correct?
If I were worried about anything, I would be worried about cupping on
those panels.
I would rather join four 4.5" boards than two 9" ones.
If I have the exact dimension wrong, forgive me, but I'm sure there's
something out in google land that tell the maximum width for sub-panels
in a wide panel glue-up.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 9:50 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> IIRC, you were joining two 9" wide boards to make 18", correct? If I
> were worried about anything, I would be worried about cupping on
> those panels. I would rather join four 4.5" boards than two 9" ones.
>
> If I have the exact dimension wrong, forgive me, but I'm sure
> there's something out in google land that tell the maximum width for
> sub-panels in a wide panel glue-up.
>
Also keep in mind that this maximum width will change depending on the
grain orientation of the wood.
I've seen solid, single plank panels, 20+ inches wide that were dead
flat after 50 years.
They just happened to be made from 1/4" sawn stock that must've been
from some seriously old-growth threes. You have to have 4ft logs to get
that kind of width with 1/4 sawn boards. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 10:00 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:35:01 PM UTC-5, whit3rd wrote:
>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:22:14 PM UTC-8, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>
>>> Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a straight router
>>> bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is too smooth for Titebond III
>>> to perform its designed task?f
>>
>> Yes, there may be something to that. A blunt (carbide) bit both cuts and slightly
>> crushes the wood as it passes. That crushing closes the ends of the wood
>> fiber, and makes glues less effective.
>
> In my case, it's a brand new Whiteside bit. Right out the case and into the "jointer"/router.
>
>>
>> For high quality veneering (and plywood) the surface quality from an
>> acute (low-angle) plane, or from light sanding, is preferred for glue
>> bond. D-day gliders, manufactured in quantity, were all sandpapered
>> before assembly and glue-up.
>>
>> Titebond recommends acetone wipe for oily woods, and
>> " A good bonding surface can also be achieved by sanding or planing the wood just before gluing the joints."
>> but there's no harm applying the same advice to poplar.
>
> They also say, regarding oily woods (which I don't believe poplar to be):
>
> "For either type of wood, planing, jointing, or sanding shortly before bonding will remove the
> contaminating layer and allow successful bonding." The use of acetone says "otherwise"
> meaning if not jointed shortly before bonding.
>
> I'm sure my router jointed edges are going to be just fine.
>
GEEZ! Poplar is not oily. Just get out of here and glue up your panels.
Man, the old wives' tales have been coming back around this groups for
decades.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 10:28 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:50:52 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 1/14/18 9:16 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 9:41:58 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> On 1/14/18 8:22 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5,
>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5,
>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE-
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my router table leaves a edge that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> buttery smooth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth
>>>>>>>>>>> surface won't soak up the glue as well and you
>>>>>>>>>>> could squeeze out too much when clamping.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical
>>>>>>>>>> yellow/wood glue is not a good gap filler and
>>>>>>>>>> works best with a minimum of product in the joint.
>>>>>>>>>> Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a
>>>>>>>>>> lot of back and forth talk on starving a joint by
>>>>>>>>>> squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation as it is
>>>>>>>>>> often called is when there is no or not enough glue
>>>>>>>>>> on the surface to begin with not because you had
>>>>>>>>>> squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was
>>>>>>>>>> too much glue in the joint to begin with. If you
>>>>>>>>>> don't get squeeze out you have no indicator that
>>>>>>>>>> the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
>>>>>>>>>> because of too much clamping pressure and causing
>>>>>>>>>> too much glue to squeeze out. Remember, a quality
>>>>>>>>>> glue joint line is one that is almost invisible.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in
>>>>>>>>> woodworking and those are three of them. Glue doesn't
>>>>>>>>> "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth"
>>>>>>>>> surface.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try it with glass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apples and Gorillas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to
>>>>> this thread and get back to the actual issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a
>>>>> straight router bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is
>>>>> too smooth for Titebond III to perform its designed task?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know what he's saying, but I'll say no. Some advice,
>>>> though. You'd be amazed at how much smoother (smaller "bumps")
>>>> a surface you get with a larger diameter bit at a higher speed
>>>> and slower feed rate with the stock.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose someone could do the math, but I'm sure you can
>>>> picture that the larger the diameter of the cutter head, the
>>>> larger the radius of the cut, meaning fewer and smoother
>>>> "bumps."
>>>>
>>>> In ANY case! Many times, when using a jointer (JOINER!, nor
>>>> wait! JOINTER! No, no, it's joinyerterner!) or router, I am
>>>> often in the habit of "planing" the edge surfaces with light
>>>> passes of 100-120 grit with a hard surface sanding pad (block
>>>> of wood) if I'm dissatisfied with the smoothness of the
>>>> surface.
>>>>
>>>> I RARELY do that when said surfaces are to be glued together.
>>>> And have never done so when using the table saw and rip blade
>>>> to prep the boards to be glued together.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm making 2 panels from 1 x stock. Each will have 2 seams. Each
>>> will see more or less the same use/abuse since they will both be
>>> used as tops for the base cabinets for the bookcase project.
>>> (similar to yours)
>>>
>>> I already glued up one panel with boards jointed with a 24 tooth
>>> rip blade.
>>>
>>> I then figured out what I was doing wrong with my hands and
>>> jointed 3 other boards with a 1/2" straight bit on my router
>>> table. I'll be gluing up that panel tomorrow.
>>>
>>> I will mark the underside of each panel as to the jointing
>>> method used. I will do my best to remember to revive this thread
>>> if either of the panels fail during my lifetime.
>>>
>>> By that time I'll probably be able to post a hologram version of
>>> the failed joint image that I'll create with the MRI machine that
>>> I'll build with my 3D printer array.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izQB2-Kmiic
>>>
>>
>> Haha! Please don't pay too much attention to the people trying to
>> make rocket surgery out of this. IIRC, you were joining two 9" wide
>> boards to make 18", correct? If I were worried about anything, I
>> would be worried about cupping on those panels. I would rather join
>> four 4.5" boards than two 9" ones.
>>
>
> Two 7.5" and one 5.5" board to be trimmed down to ~18". But, and this
> is a big but...
>
> Here is a close up of one of the 7.25" boards:
>
> https://i.imgur.com/YLE37pH.jpg
>
> The boards are already edge glued, consisting of random 3/4" to ~2"
> strips.
>
> A local lumber yard carries them as "paint grade" boards, at a much
> lower cost than clear poplar. They are dead flat and the joints are
> so tight the only way that they are visible is because of the change
> in grain.
>
> I spoke to a couple of contractors that frequent the lumber yard and
> they can't say enough good things about these boards. We'll see.
>
PFFT! Well, then we're already talking about glued up panels.
Nothing to worry about. I used a bunch of those in pine a couple days
ago and I use them all the time for wide shelf panels. I love them.
They are very stable and a good way to save time.
My only advice would be to try to rip them to size at the glue joints if
possible to maintain a consistent width in the laminated boards.
Color variations aside (hard to avoid with poplar) those all look like
nice, straight grained segments. You should have great results.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 11:13 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 11:34:39 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 1/14/18 10:28 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:50:52 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> On 1/14/18 9:16 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 9:41:58 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/14/18 8:22 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 6:53:14 PM UTC-5,
>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:27:10 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5,
>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE-
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my router table leaves a edge that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buttery smooth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth
>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface won't soak up the glue as well and you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could squeeze out too much when clamping.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical
>>>>>>>>>>>> yellow/wood glue is not a good gap filler and
>>>>>>>>>>>> works best with a minimum of product in the joint.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of back and forth talk on starving a joint by
>>>>>>>>>>>> squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation as it is
>>>>>>>>>>>> often called is when there is no or not enough glue
>>>>>>>>>>>> on the surface to begin with not because you had
>>>>>>>>>>>> squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was
>>>>>>>>>>>> too much glue in the joint to begin with. If you
>>>>>>>>>>>> don't get squeeze out you have no indicator that
>>>>>>>>>>>> the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
>>>>>>>>>>>> because of too much clamping pressure and causing
>>>>>>>>>>>> too much glue to squeeze out. Remember, a quality
>>>>>>>>>>>> glue joint line is one that is almost invisible.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in
>>>>>>>>>>> woodworking and those are three of them. Glue doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth"
>>>>>>>>>>> surface.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Try it with glass.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apples and Gorillas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, it really isn't. It's a mechanical connection.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, let's stop arguing about stuff that doesn't matter to
>>>>>>> this thread and get back to the actual issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bottom line: Are you saying that the surfaces created by a
>>>>>>> straight router bit on the edges of two 1 x poplar boards is
>>>>>>> too smooth for Titebond III to perform its designed task?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know what he's saying, but I'll say no. Some advice,
>>>>>> though. You'd be amazed at how much smoother (smaller "bumps")
>>>>>> a surface you get with a larger diameter bit at a higher speed
>>>>>> and slower feed rate with the stock.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suppose someone could do the math, but I'm sure you can
>>>>>> picture that the larger the diameter of the cutter head, the
>>>>>> larger the radius of the cut, meaning fewer and smoother
>>>>>> "bumps."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In ANY case! Many times, when using a jointer (JOINER!, nor
>>>>>> wait! JOINTER! No, no, it's joinyerterner!) or router, I am
>>>>>> often in the habit of "planing" the edge surfaces with light
>>>>>> passes of 100-120 grit with a hard surface sanding pad (block
>>>>>> of wood) if I'm dissatisfied with the smoothness of the
>>>>>> surface.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I RARELY do that when said surfaces are to be glued together.
>>>>>> And have never done so when using the table saw and rip blade
>>>>>> to prep the boards to be glued together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm making 2 panels from 1 x stock. Each will have 2 seams. Each
>>>>> will see more or less the same use/abuse since they will both be
>>>>> used as tops for the base cabinets for the bookcase project.
>>>>> (similar to yours)
>>>>>
>>>>> I already glued up one panel with boards jointed with a 24 tooth
>>>>> rip blade.
>>>>>
>>>>> I then figured out what I was doing wrong with my hands and
>>>>> jointed 3 other boards with a 1/2" straight bit on my router
>>>>> table. I'll be gluing up that panel tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will mark the underside of each panel as to the jointing
>>>>> method used. I will do my best to remember to revive this thread
>>>>> if either of the panels fail during my lifetime.
>>>>>
>>>>> By that time I'll probably be able to post a hologram version of
>>>>> the failed joint image that I'll create with the MRI machine that
>>>>> I'll build with my 3D printer array.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izQB2-Kmiic
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Haha! Please don't pay too much attention to the people trying to
>>>> make rocket surgery out of this. IIRC, you were joining two 9" wide
>>>> boards to make 18", correct? If I were worried about anything, I
>>>> would be worried about cupping on those panels. I would rather join
>>>> four 4.5" boards than two 9" ones.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Two 7.5" and one 5.5" board to be trimmed down to ~18". But, and this
>>> is a big but...
>>>
>>> Here is a close up of one of the 7.25" boards:
>>>
>>> https://i.imgur.com/YLE37pH.jpg
>>>
>>> The boards are already edge glued, consisting of random 3/4" to ~2"
>>> strips.
>>>
>>> A local lumber yard carries them as "paint grade" boards, at a much
>>> lower cost than clear poplar. They are dead flat and the joints are
>>> so tight the only way that they are visible is because of the change
>>> in grain.
>>>
>>> I spoke to a couple of contractors that frequent the lumber yard and
>>> they can't say enough good things about these boards. We'll see.
>>>
>>
>> PFFT! Well, then we're already talking about glued up panels.
>> Nothing to worry about. I used a bunch of those in pine a couple days
>> ago and I use them all the time for wide shelf panels. I love them.
>> They are very stable and a good way to save time.
>>
>
> Actually, what started me down this jointing and gluing path was the POS
> pine panel that I bought at Lowes last week.
>
> I think this is what I bought but it was shrink wrapped. (I tossed the
> packaging and can't find the receipt right now.)
>
> https://www.lowes.com/pd/Common-3-4-in-x-20-in-x-6-ft-Actual-0-62-in-x-19-25-in-x-6-ft-Pine-Board/50053137
>
> It seemed to be perfectly flat in the store, but once I cross cut it in
> half, it warped so fast I could almost watch it bend. ;-)
>
> By the next morning one piece rocked diagonally corner to corner and
> when I put the 2 halves face to face there's an ~3/32 gap at the center
> of the 20" width. They look like this: ()
>
> If Lowe's won't take it back with just the receipt, I've got $32 worth of
> "quick burn" material for the fire pit.
>
When I buy them, I always check the ends at the end grain to see if they
are alternated, grain-wise.
Most of those are made in Brazil in factories that don't have the most
skilled laborers.
So it's worth it to make sure the grain patterns are alternating on each
and every laminated board.
Oh, and Lowes will take back just about anything... even if it's just
for store credit.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 18:31:26 -0600, Markem <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:03:19 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>>Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>>
>>Try it with glass.
>
>With the proper glue no problem.
A book anybody who _thinks_ they know anything about glue should read:
<https://www.amazon.com/Handbook-Adhesive-Bonding-Reprint-Hardcover/dp/B011MEVDB2/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1515977968&sr=8-3&keywords=handbook+of+adhesive+bonding+cagle>
If you're not a chemist you're probably going to find out that
everything you _think_ you know is wrong.
On 1/13/2018 10:05 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>>>> movement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>>>>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>>>>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>>>>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>>>
>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>>
>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>>>
>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>>>
>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>>> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>>
>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>>
>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>>
>> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>>
>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
>>> that is buttery smooth.
>>
>> Not the best for a glue up.
>
> So you're saying that jointing with a router should be avoided?
>
> Why are there so many articles and videos from so many sources detailing the technique?
>
Many articles and videos are simply some one repeating what they saw or
heard, right or wrong. Joining with a router table is much like hand
nailing with nail gun nails. It can be done but is it the preferred or
best way to do it?
Why does a jointer work better than using a router table to join boards?
To begin with "mass", the jointer is heavy and absorbs vibration and is
typically all iron so that it does not flex. The router table is pretty
much light weight by comparison and not as stiff.
When you are joining on a jointer you use the weight of the material to
help hold the work against the cutter and indexing surfaces. Not to
mention it is easier to push down vs. sideways like on a RT. And you
can use your body weight to pus down on the work as it goes through a
jointer. Your weight is not used to keep the work against the cutter on
a router table.
One more thing on you technique that may not have been covered. When
you are running the work on the RT are you straightening the convex edge
of the board? If not you will be changing feed direction all through
the cut if the fence on both sides is not as long as the work.
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:14:12 PM UTC-5, Sonny wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>=20
> > At 36" long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the=
=20
> jointed edge.
>=20
> Bumps, not indents. Can you sand the bumps off? I'm aware you prefer t=
o get the best results using the router, but sanding may be your last resor=
t. Unless someone has a resolution to your issue.
>=20
> I'm suspecting your fences are not in line, on the same plane, parallel..=
.. hence the "wobble" in the motion of the run through the cutter, i.e., it=
's not the movement of your hands or hands' position. Mis-aligned fences =
would make the ends of your finished (erred) cut be out of line with the r=
est of the length of the board/edge, despite any bumps, i.e., even if you s=
and them down. Does that make sense?
>=20
> Sonny
Either I'm not understanding what you are saying or you misunderstand me.
Not arguing, just trying to clarify.
Here's my side of it...let me know if I'm missing what you are saying.
When jointing on a router table, the fences are *supposed* to be mis-aligne=
d.
The out-feed fence is supposed to be about 1/16" closer to the operator tha=
n
the in-feed fence. The bit is then aligned flush with the face of the out-f=
eed
fence. With pressure kept on the out-feed table, you are supposed to
get an edge that is flat and perfect square with the face of the board,
just like on a jointer.
My problem is that I am not able to keep consistent pressure on the=20
out-feed fence as I reposition my hands. I get the bump shown below because
board is moving away from the bit just a little, therefore less than 1/16"=
=20
of wood is being removed until my hands are back in place applying pressure=
=20
against the fence.
https://i.imgur.com/hjSOHrP.jpg
While sanding or planing is a possible solution, there is always the danger=
=20
of taking off just a little to much and causing a gap. From what I've read
or watched, this method is supposed to work, so ether it's my technique
or my equipment.
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:02:00 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:
>On 1/13/2018 9:43 PM, Michael wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 9:06:05 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>>>>> movement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>>>>>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>>>>>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>>>>>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>>>
>>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>>>>
>>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>>>>
>>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>>>> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>>>
>>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>>>
>>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>>>
>>> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>>>
>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
>>>> that is buttery smooth.
>>>
>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>
>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when clamping.
>>
>
>There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue is
>not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in the
>joint. Tooth marks create gaps.
>Additionally there is a lot of back and forth talk on starving a joint
>by squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation as it is often called is
>when there is no or not enough glue on the surface to begin with not
>because you had squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was too
>much glue in the joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you
>have no indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint
>fail because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
>squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is almost
>invisible.
I don't think the issue is tooth marks (there shouldn't be any). The
issue is the "polished surface". The glue has to have something to
bite into. A polished surface doesn't work. Try using Titebond on
glass.
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> > > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> > > the in-feed fence.
> > >
> > > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> > > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> > > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> > > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> > > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> > > movement.
> > >
> > > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> > > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> > >
> > > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >
> > I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
> >
> > Best of luck.
>
> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>
> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>
> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
On 1/14/2018 9:42 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 1:34:32 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>> DerbyDad03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:38:29 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>>>> On 1/13/2018 5:37 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:55:47 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/13/2018 4:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>>>> movement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have not joined on a router, but frequently use the router to create
>>>>>> profiles on picture frames. I have found that I get the best results
>>>>>> using feather boards on the in fed and out feed ends of the router.
>>>>>> This then keeps the piece firmly against the fence on both sides to the
>>>>>> bit for the length of the piece. With the fence I only have to keep the
>>>>>> piece flat against the table, which I fine easier that trying to keep it
>>>>>> against the fence and the table. Without the feather board I find the I
>>>>>> tend to get waves in the route.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The router table is a Sears router table to which I attache a standard
>>>>>> router. The fence is only about 18". I use a one piece fence with an
>>>>>> opening for the bit. I have had good results using this technique with
>>>>>> frames as long as 40 inches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect that the same technique may work when joining.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just FYI...It's jointing, not joining.
>>>>
>>>> I think it is joining.
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure it's jointing
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jointer
>>> http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?cat=1&p=41801
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>> No, it us a little confusing. A jointer is a machine, what Lee Valley is
>> selling. The apparatus. To prepaid and join., is joining. :-)
>
> By "prepaid", I assume you mean "prepare". If that's the case, I have to
> respectfully disagree.
Yes, prepare. And NP if you disagree.
>
> Maybe we aren't talking about the same thing or using the words in the
> same context. I was responding to Keith's comments, which involve the
> preparation step only.
>
> First he said: "I have not joined on a router"
>
> Then, after discusses his use of feathers boards on the in-feed and out-feed
> side he said "I suspect that the same technique may work when joining."
>
> Therefore he is talking about the preparation of the edges only. As far as
> I can tell from everything I've read, the preparation step is called jointing.
>
> From the same Veritas page:
>
> "One of the great advantages of the Veritas router table fence is that it makes jointing easy." Jointing, as in the process, not the apparatus.
>
> From (if you trust wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_jointing
>
> Here they discuss both the preparation process (jointing), the apparatus
> (jointer) and the subsequent operation of putting the components together
> (joining).
>
> "Edge jointing or just jointing is the process of making the edge of a wooden
> board straight and true in preparation for subsequent operations, often
> ultimately leading to joining two or more components together. Traditionally,
> jointing was performed using a jointer plane. Modern techniques include the
> use of a jointer machine, a hand held router and straight edge, or a table-
> mounted router. Although the process derives its name from the primary task of
> straightening an edge prior to joining, the term jointing is used whenever
> this process is performed, regardless of the application."
>
> From: http://www.finewoodworking.com/2014/02/19/jointing-boards-for-dead-flat-panel-glue-ups
>
> The title of article and video is "Jointing Boards for Dead-Flat Panel
> Glue-Ups"
>
> I could go on. Everything I can find refers to the process of prepping the
> board as jointing. Then you join them, creating a joint.
>
> I am certainly willing to admit being wrong, but then so must be all the
> sources that use the term jointing for the preparation process.
>
FWIW I used to call it jointing long ago....
But, https://www.festoolusa.com/products/domino-joining-system
We can leave it there. ;~)
On 1/14/2018 9:06 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 12:54:31 AM UTC-5, Sonny wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:31:12 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> When jointing on a router table, the fences are *supposed* to be mis-aligned.
>>
>> Correct!
>>
>>> The out-feed fence is supposed to be about 1/16" closer to the operator than
>>> the in-feed fence.
>>
>> Correct!
>>
>>> The bit is then aligned flush with the face of the out-feed
>>> fence.
>>
>> Correct!
>>
>> I'm suspecting the two fences, outfeed and infeed, are not parallel, despite their being offset. They are not exactly coplanar. They need to be offset and they also need to be perfectly coplanar.
>
>
>>
>> I suspect your hand movement is giving you a misjudged idea of why you are having the bump. It's not your hand movement that's the (main, if at all) problem. Check to make sure your fences are coplanar, despite their being offset.
>
> Sonny, I'd love to agree with you here, but when I can hear the router change sounds
> and see the wood move away from the fence as I shift my hands, and then see the bump
> (or bumps) exactly where I expect them to be, I have to blame it on my hands.
>
> Sometimes I get one if I am ever, so so careful and slow, others times I get 2 or 3, but they
> are *always* positioned exactly where the wood is contacting the bit when my hands shift
> position.
>
>>
>> Sonny
>
There is also the possibility that you are applying too much pressure
and slightly bending the board as you are feeding it. If so the board
could spring back slightly if even pressure is not applied.
On 1/13/2018 11:17 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 1/13/18 10:15 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:05:06 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-5,
>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6,
>>>>>>>> DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router
>>>>>>>>> table so I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long.
>>>>>>>>> I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed
>>>>>>>>> fence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on
>>>>>>>>> the out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even
>>>>>>>>> pressure as I move the board along. At 36" long I have
>>>>>>>>> to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the
>>>>>>>>> jointed edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the
>>>>>>>>> table on the out-feed side, but I'm still getting 2-3
>>>>>>>>> bumps on the jointed edge because of hand movement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
>>>>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the
>>>>>>>>> problem?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a
>>>>>>>>> gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight
>>>>>>>> edge to the top of the board and running a router along
>>>>>>>> the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to
>>>>>>>> try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However,
>>>>>>> jointing on a router table is fairly common. I suspect my
>>>>>>> long boards relative to the fence may be the issue. I'm
>>>>>>> fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just a little
>>>>>>> less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router
>>>>>>> table.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw
>>>>>> rips?
>>>>>
>>>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this
>>>>> process:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square 2 -
>>>>> Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against
>>>>> the fence
>>>>
>>>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>>>>
>>>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw
>>>>> marks.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>>>>
>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
>>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>>>>
>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>
>>> So you're saying that jointing with a router should be avoided?
>>
>> No, just that a table saw, properly set up, is good enough.
>>
>>> Why are there so many articles and videos from so many sources
>>> detailing the technique?
>>
>> I have no idea. Maybe because if all you have a hammer, the entire
>> world looks like a screw?
>>
>> However, the point I was trying to make was that a glass-like
>> surface may not be best for a (wood) glue joint.
>>
>
> There are so many articles because people don't have decent table saws
> nor blades.
> He's right. A great rip blade and properly tuned table saw are all you
> need.
yeah!
>
> I don't agree with the comment about glass-like surface however.
> The glue doesn't know the difference.
> I used to do a LOT of stuff with my router until I got a good table saw
> and blades.
> About the only thing I do with the router, now, are curved profiles.
Me too. And FWIW I had a jointer for a couple of decades, I hardly used
it after getting decent saws and blades. And I would be happy to
compare glue lines. ;~) My track saw is my edge joiner now.
>
> A good rip blade leaves a much smoother surface than a jointer.
> The rotation of the TB blade is running parallel to the joint, while the
> router and jointer blades are rotations are running perpendicular to it.
> Â You will always have some bumping, no matter how small, with that
> orientation.
>
>
On 1/13/2018 10:56 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:41:57 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>> movement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>
>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>
>>>> Best of luck.
>>>
>>> Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different manner.
>>>
>>> http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
>>
>> I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well. I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
>
> Join the club! I'm sure I'm doing something wrong too.
>
I can guarantee you that aluminum angle is not straight enough to form a
glue line surface.
On 1/14/2018 9:11 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 8:12:31 AM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
>> "DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>>>
>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>>>
>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>>> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the
>>> fence
>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>>>
>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
>>> that is buttery smooth.
>>
>> Except for the bumps :)
>
> I actually added that at the end of my post and then deleted it before
> hitting send. :-)
>
LOL....
DerbyDad03 <[email protected]> wrote in news:79638a7b-5870-4e5c-a4f7-
[email protected]:
> I don't have a jointer (obviously) but how can a light pass cause the
> board to taper? Whether jointing on a router table or on a jointer, aren't
> you taking off the same amount of wood along the entire length of the board?
Not necessarily, no -- and that's what can produce a taper.
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:41:57 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> > > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> > > > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> > > > the in-feed fence.
> > > >
> > > > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> > > > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> > > > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> > > > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> > > > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> > > > movement.
> > > >
> > > > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> > > > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> > > >
> > > > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> > >
> > > I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
> > >
> > > Best of luck.
> >
> > Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different manner.
> >
> > http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
>
> I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well. I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
Join the club! I'm sure I'm doing something wrong too.
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 12:54:31 AM UTC-5, Sonny wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:31:12 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>
> >
> > When jointing on a router table, the fences are *supposed* to be mis-aligned.
>
> Correct!
>
> > The out-feed fence is supposed to be about 1/16" closer to the operator than
> > the in-feed fence.
>
> Correct!
>
> > The bit is then aligned flush with the face of the out-feed
> > fence.
>
> Correct!
>
> I'm suspecting the two fences, outfeed and infeed, are not parallel, despite their being offset. They are not exactly coplanar. They need to be offset and they also need to be perfectly coplanar.
>
> I suspect your hand movement is giving you a misjudged idea of why you are having the bump. It's not your hand movement that's the (main, if at all) problem. Check to make sure your fences are coplanar, despite their being offset.
Sonny, I'd love to agree with you here, but when I can hear the router change sounds
and see the wood move away from the fence as I shift my hands, and then see the bump
(or bumps) exactly where I expect them to be, I have to blame it on my hands.
Sometimes I get one if I am ever, so so careful and slow, others times I get 2 or 3, but they
are *always* positioned exactly where the wood is contacting the bit when my hands shift
position.
>
> Sonny
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> > > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> > > the in-feed fence.
> > >
> > > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> > > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> > > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> > > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> > > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> > > movement.
> > >
> > > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> > > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> > >
> > > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >
> > I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
> >
> > Best of luck.
>
> Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different manner.
>
> http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well. I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>> > > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> > > > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>> > > > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>> > > > the in-feed fence.
>> > > >
>> > > > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>> > > > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>> > > > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>> > > > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>> > > > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>> > > > movement.
>> > > >
>> > > > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>> > > > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>> > > >
>> > > > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>> > >
>> > > I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>> > >
>> > > Best of luck.
>> >
>> > That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>> > table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>> > may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>> > a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>> >
>> > https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>> >
>> > See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>> >
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>
>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>
>It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>
>1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
>that is buttery smooth.
Not the best for a glue up.
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 8:12:31 AM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
> "DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
> >
> > It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
> >
> > 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
> > 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the
> > fence
> > 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
> >
> > My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
> > that is buttery smooth.
>
> Except for the bumps :)
I actually added that at the end of my post and then deleted it before
hitting send. :-)
On 1/13/2018 9:43 PM, Michael wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 9:06:05 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>>>> movement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>>>>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>>>>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>>>>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>>>
>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>>
>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>>>
>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>>>
>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>>> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>>
>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>>
>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>>
>> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>>
>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
>>> that is buttery smooth.
>>
>> Not the best for a glue up.
>
> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when clamping.
>
There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue is
not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in the
joint. Tooth marks create gaps.
Additionally there is a lot of back and forth talk on starving a joint
by squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation as it is often called is
when there is no or not enough glue on the surface to begin with not
because you had squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was too
much glue in the joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you
have no indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint
fail because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is almost
invisible.
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:32:36 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
> On 1/13/2018 3:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> > the in-feed fence.
> >
> > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> > movement.
> >
> > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >
> > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >
>
> The fence offset MUST ABSOLUTELY BE SET EXACTLY to the the depth of the
> cut.
Yes, the out-feed fence is flush with the cutting surface of the bit.
> Apply pressure to the in feed side until you have enough on the
> out feed side that you can finish the pass.
Yes, but my problem is on the out-feed side. While working on the
out-feed side, any, *any* let-up in pressure against the fence causes the
bump.
>
> I can tell you how to do this on your TS, if you have a TS, and a scrap
> piece of plywood that is 3+' long.
Thanks, but I am aware of that method.
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> At 36" long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the=20
jointed edge.
Bumps, not indents. Can you sand the bumps off? I'm aware you prefer to =
get the best results using the router, but sanding may be your last resort.=
Unless someone has a resolution to your issue.
I'm suspecting your fences are not in line, on the same plane, parallel....=
hence the "wobble" in the motion of the run through the cutter, i.e., it's=
not the movement of your hands or hands' position. Mis-aligned fences w=
ould make the ends of your finished (erred) cut be out of line with the res=
t of the length of the board/edge, despite any bumps, i.e., even if you san=
d them down. Does that make sense?
Sonny
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 5:03:30 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
> >>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
> >>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
> >>>>
> >>>> Not the best for a glue up.
> >>>
> >>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak
> >>> up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when
> >>> clamping.
> >>>
> >>
> >> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue
> >> is not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in
> >> the joint. Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of
> >> back and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it.
> >> Glue starvation as it is often called is when there is no or not
> >> enough glue on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze
> >> out. You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
> >> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have no
> >> indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
> >> because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
> >> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is
> >> almost invisible.
> >
> >Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and those are
> >three of them.
> >Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>
> Try it with glass.
Apples and Gorillas
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:15:50 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:05:06 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> >> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >> >> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >> >> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
> >> >> > > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >> >> > > > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> >> >> > > > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> >> >> > > > the in-feed fence.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> >> >> > > > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> >> >> > > > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> >> >> > > > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> >> >> > > > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> >> >> > > > movement.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> >> >> > > > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Best of luck.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
> >> >> > table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
> >> >> > may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
> >> >> > a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
> >> >> >
> >> >> > See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
> >> >>
> >> >> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
> >> >
> >> >It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
> >> >
> >> >1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
> >> >2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
> >>
> >> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
> >>
> >> >3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
> >>
> >> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
> >>
> >> >My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
> >> >that is buttery smooth.
> >>
> >> Not the best for a glue up.
> >
> >So you're saying that jointing with a router should be avoided?
>
> No, just that a table saw, properly set up, is good enough.
>
> >Why are there so many articles and videos from so many sources detailing the technique?
>
> I have no idea. Maybe because if all you have a hammer, the entire
> world looks like a screw?
In many cases I'd agree with that, but that seems a stretch in this instance. Too many
sources and nary a single detractor that I know of.
> However, the point I was trying to make was that a glass-like surface
> may not be best for a (wood) glue joint.
I'll let you know. ;-)
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:30:15 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 1/14/18 4:07 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:48:33 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/14/18 11:22 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>> On 1/13/2018 10:56 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:41:57 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so
>>>>>>>>> I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the
>>>>>>>>> out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the
>>>>>>>>> out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I
>>>>>>>>> move the board along. At 36" long I have to move my hands
>>>>>>>>> and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed edge. I tried to
>>>>>>>>> clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because
>>>>>>>>> of hand movement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
>>>>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap
>>>>>>>>> free glue-up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to
>>>>>>>> the top of the board and running a router along the side with
>>>>>>>> a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router
>>>>>>>> table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different
>>>>>>> manner.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well.
>>>>>> I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to
>>>>>> get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Join the club! I'm sure I'm doing something wrong too.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can guarantee you that aluminum angle is not straight enough to
>>>> form a glue line surface.
>>>
>>> It's only straight if it's attached to something straight. :-)
>>> I think in the article in the link, it's attached to a straight board
>>> and hopefully triple checked. I believe the aluminum is there to give
>>> the router bit bearing a hard, smooth surface to reference.
>>
>> But why does the bearing need a surface harder than a board. It's not
>> very sharp. ;-)
>>
>
>I think it's to protect it from betting bumped or nicked up.
>I used hard maple on my dado jig because the surfaces are always
>protected by the opposing sides.
Aluminum doesn't dent? I'd go for the maple (or perhaps white oak)
for a long-term use jig, too.
On 1/13/2018 3:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> the in-feed fence.
>
> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> movement.
>
> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>
> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>
The fence offset MUST ABSOLUTELY BE SET EXACTLY to the the depth of the
cut. Apply pressure to the in feed side until you have enough on the
out feed side that you can finish the pass.
I can tell you how to do this on your TS, if you have a TS, and a scrap
piece of plywood that is 3+' long.
[email protected] wrote in
news:[email protected]:
>
> I don't think the issue is tooth marks (there shouldn't be any). The
> issue is the "polished surface". The glue has to have something to
> bite into. A polished surface doesn't work. Try using Titebond on
> glass.
How strong is a wood glue joint if both pieces have been shellaced first?
I wonder if the wood glue causes a slight swelling in doing its magic.
Puckdropper
--
http://www.puckdroppersplace.us/rec.woodworking
A mini archive of some of rec.woodworking's best and worst!
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
>>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>>>>
>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>
>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak
>>> up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when
>>> clamping.
>>>
>>
>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue
>> is not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in
>> the joint. Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of
>> back and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it.
>> Glue starvation as it is often called is when there is no or not
>> enough glue on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze
>> out. You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
>> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have no
>> indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
>> because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
>> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is
>> almost invisible.
>
>Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and those are
>three of them.
>Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
Try it with glass.
>The glue staved thing is mostly a myth. The proper amount of glue is
>enough glue to lightly coat the surfaces, and if wanted, allowed to
>"soak in" for a minute before joining together and clamping. And that
>is usually too much. :-) Like you said, if there's *any* squeeze-out
>at all, it's enough.
>As for clamping, again I will say I think most people would be very
>surprised by how little pressure is actually required for a properly
>clamped glue joint. Most people, myself included, use WAY too much
>pressure and way too much glue.
On 1/13/2018 4:10 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> the in-feed fence.
>
> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> movement.
>
> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>
> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>
I have not joined on a router, but frequently use the router to create
profiles on picture frames. I have found that I get the best results
using feather boards on the in fed and out feed ends of the router.
This then keeps the piece firmly against the fence on both sides to the
bit for the length of the piece. With the fence I only have to keep the
piece flat against the table, which I fine easier that trying to keep it
against the fence and the table. Without the feather board I find the I
tend to get waves in the route.
The router table is a Sears router table to which I attache a standard
router. The fence is only about 18". I use a one piece fence with an
opening for the bit. I have had good results using this technique with
frames as long as 40 inches.
I suspect that the same technique may work when joining.
--
2017: The year we learn to play the great game of Euchre
On 1/13/2018 6:31 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> My problem is that I am not able to keep consistent pressure on the
> out-feed fence as I reposition my hands. I get the bump shown below because
> board is moving away from the bit just a little, therefore less than 1/16"
> of wood is being removed until my hands are back in place applying pressure
> against the fence.
>
> https://i.imgur.com/hjSOHrP.jpg
>
> While sanding or planing is a possible solution, there is always the danger
> of taking off just a little to much and causing a gap. From what I've read
> or watched, this method is supposed to work, so ether it's my technique
> or my equipment.
As I said above this is precisely the problem that I was having when
routing the profiles on picture frames. While manually holding the
piece, the piece would tend to wiggle near the end of the piece or when
I readjusted my hands.
The use of in fed and out fed feather board prevented this wiggle. The
feather boards do not need to place a lot of pressure on the piece just
enough to hold it firmly against the fence.
--
2017: The year we learn to play the great game of Euchre
On 1/13/18 10:15 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:05:06 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-5,
>> [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6,
>>>>>>> DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router
>>>>>>>> table so I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long.
>>>>>>>> I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed
>>>>>>>> fence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on
>>>>>>>> the out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even
>>>>>>>> pressure as I move the board along. At 36" long I have
>>>>>>>> to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the
>>>>>>>> jointed edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the
>>>>>>>> table on the out-feed side, but I'm still getting 2-3
>>>>>>>> bumps on the jointed edge because of hand movement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
>>>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the
>>>>>>>> problem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a
>>>>>>>> gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight
>>>>>>> edge to the top of the board and running a router along
>>>>>>> the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to
>>>>>>> try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However,
>>>>>> jointing on a router table is fairly common. I suspect my
>>>>>> long boards relative to the fence may be the issue. I'm
>>>>>> fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just a little
>>>>>> less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router
>>>>>> table.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>>>
>>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw
>>>>> rips?
>>>>
>>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this
>>>> process:
>>>>
>>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square 2 -
>>>> Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against
>>>> the fence
>>>
>>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>>>
>>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw
>>>> marks.
>>>
>>> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>>>
>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>>>
>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>
>> So you're saying that jointing with a router should be avoided?
>
> No, just that a table saw, properly set up, is good enough.
>
>> Why are there so many articles and videos from so many sources
>> detailing the technique?
>
> I have no idea. Maybe because if all you have a hammer, the entire
> world looks like a screw?
>
> However, the point I was trying to make was that a glass-like
> surface may not be best for a (wood) glue joint.
>
There are so many articles because people don't have decent table saws
nor blades.
He's right. A great rip blade and properly tuned table saw are all you
need.
I don't agree with the comment about glass-like surface however.
The glue doesn't know the difference.
I used to do a LOT of stuff with my router until I got a good table saw
and blades.
About the only thing I do with the router, now, are curved profiles.
A good rip blade leaves a much smoother surface than a jointer.
The rotation of the TB blade is running parallel to the joint, while the
router and jointer blades are rotations are running perpendicular to it.
You will always have some bumping, no matter how small, with that
orientation.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
"DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:14:12 PM UTC-5, Sonny wrote:
> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>
> > At 36" long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the
> jointed edge.
>
> Bumps, not indents. Can you sand the bumps off? I'm aware you prefer to
> get the best results using the router, but sanding may be your last
> resort. Unless someone has a resolution to your issue.
>
> I'm suspecting your fences are not in line, on the same plane,
> parallel.... hence the "wobble" in the motion of the run through the
> cutter, i.e., it's not the movement of your hands or hands' position.
> Mis-aligned fences would make the ends of your finished (erred) cut be
> out of line with the rest of the length of the board/edge, despite any
> bumps, i.e., even if you sand them down. Does that make sense?
>
> Sonny
Either I'm not understanding what you are saying or you misunderstand me.
Not arguing, just trying to clarify.
Here's my side of it...let me know if I'm missing what you are saying.
When jointing on a router table, the fences are *supposed* to be
mis-aligned.
The out-feed fence is supposed to be about 1/16" closer to the operator than
the in-feed fence.
Yes, fences are supposed to be mis-aligned but they are also supposed to be
parallel. Yours don't seem to be. Easiest way to set them...
1. Set both sides in line, slightly back of front edge of bit
2. Run a piece of wood through until you have at least a foot on the outfeed
side
3. Turn off router and close the gap between work piece and fence by moving
outfeed fence to work piece
"DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>
> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>
> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the
> fence
> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>
> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
> that is buttery smooth.
Except for the bumps :)
On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>>>
>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>
>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak
>> up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when
>> clamping.
>>
>
> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue
> is not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in
> the joint. Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of
> back and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it.
> Glue starvation as it is often called is when there is no or not
> enough glue on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze
> out. You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have no
> indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
> because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is
> almost invisible.
Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and those are
three of them.
Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
The glue staved thing is mostly a myth. The proper amount of glue is
enough glue to lightly coat the surfaces, and if wanted, allowed to
"soak in" for a minute before joining together and clamping. And that
is usually too much. :-) Like you said, if there's *any* squeeze-out
at all, it's enough.
As for clamping, again I will say I think most people would be very
surprised by how little pressure is actually required for a properly
clamped glue joint. Most people, myself included, use WAY too much
pressure and way too much glue.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 11:22 AM, Leon wrote:
> On 1/13/2018 10:56 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:41:57 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so
>>>>>> I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the
>>>>>> out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the
>>>>>> out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I
>>>>>> move the board along. At 36" long I have to move my hands
>>>>>> and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed edge. I tried to
>>>>>> clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because
>>>>>> of hand movement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap
>>>>>> free glue-up?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to
>>>>> the top of the board and running a router along the side with
>>>>> a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router
>>>>> table for this purpose.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>
>>>> Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different
>>>> manner.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well.
>>> I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to
>>> get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
>>
>> Join the club! I'm sure I'm doing something wrong too.
>>
>
> I can guarantee you that aluminum angle is not straight enough to
> form a glue line surface.
It's only straight if it's attached to something straight. :-)
I think in the article in the link, it's attached to a straight board
and hopefully triple checked. I believe the aluminum is there to give
the router bit bearing a hard, smooth surface to reference.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
"DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
> the in-feed fence.
>
> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
> movement.
>
> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>
> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
Since you want to think that your holding method is at fault rather than
your fence haves not being parallel, let me suggest that you not move your
hands. There is no need to, left hand holds the work against the outfeed
fence, right hand moves it along. Now, if the work were much more than 36"
long, you would have to move your right hand but not your left; no matter,
left is still holding it where it should be.
Trust me, all is true, been doing it that way for more than 30 years.
"dadiOH" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>> the in-feed fence.
>>
>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed
>> side,
>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>> movement.
>>
>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>
>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>
> Since you want to think that your holding method is at fault rather than
> your fence haves
HALVES
On 1/14/18 3:23 PM, Leon wrote:
> On 1/14/2018 12:48 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 1/14/18 11:22 AM, Leon wrote:
>>> On 1/13/2018 10:56 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:41:57 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so
>>>>>>>> I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the
>>>>>>>> out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the
>>>>>>>> Â out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I
>>>>>>>> move the board along. At 36" long I have to move my hands
>>>>>>>> and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed edge. I tried to
>>>>>>>> clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side, but
>>>>>>>> I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because
>>>>>>>> of hand movement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
>>>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap
>>>>>>>> free glue-up?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to
>>>>>>> the top of the board and running a router along the side with
>>>>>>> a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router
>>>>>>> table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different
>>>>>> manner.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well.
>>>>> I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to
>>>>> get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
>>>>
>>>> Join the club! I'm sure I'm doing something wrong too.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can guarantee you that aluminum angle is not straight enough to
>>> form a glue line surface.
>>
>> It's only straight if it's attached to something straight.  :-)
>> I think in the article in the link, it's attached to a straight board
>> and hopefully triple checked. I believe the aluminum is there to give
>> the router bit bearing a hard, smooth surface to reference.
>>
>>
>
> Yeah, and what are the chances of that board staying straight through
> out the year.  Probably a better choice would have been to use a
> straight piece of plywood.  LOL. I think the aluminum would dent or
> nick pretty easily.
True with the plywood, of course.
I think aluminum isn't a bad choice because it wouldn't dull the bit if
it got nicked.
I used hard maple for the bearing guides on my dado jig and it works great.
https://goo.gl/photos/StFnQBzCj3J9NCcp8
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 4:02 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 11:02:00 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/13/2018 9:43 PM, Michael wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 9:06:05 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>>>>>>>>> a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>>>>>>>>> the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>>>>>>>>> but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>>>>>>>>> long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>>>>>>>>> edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>>>>>>>>> movement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>>>>>>>>> entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>>>>>>> table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>>>>>>> may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>>>>>>> a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>>>>>
>>>>> It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>>>>> 2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>>>>
>>>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>>>>
>>>>> 3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>>>>
>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
>>>>> that is buttery smooth.
>>>>
>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>
>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when clamping.
>>>
>>
>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue is
>> not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in the
>> joint. Tooth marks create gaps.
>> Additionally there is a lot of back and forth talk on starving a joint
>> by squeezing glue out of it. Glue starvation as it is often called is
>> when there is no or not enough glue on the surface to begin with not
>> because you had squeeze out. You get squeeze out because there was too
>> much glue in the joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you
>> have no indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint
>> fail because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
>> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is almost
>> invisible.
>
> I don't think the issue is tooth marks (there shouldn't be any). The
> issue is the "polished surface". The glue has to have something to
> bite into. A polished surface doesn't work. Try using Titebond on
> glass.
>
That is simply not true and a completely apples to oranges...
well, no, actually a wood to glass comparison.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 4:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:44:52 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/14/18 11:02 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>> My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table
>>>>>> leaves a edge that is buttery smooth.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not the best for a glue up.
>>>>
>>>> I wondered about that as well. A really smooth surface won't soak
>>>> up the glue as well and you could squeeze out too much when
>>>> clamping.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There is a lot of back and forth on this. Typical yellow/wood glue
>>> is not a good gap filler and works best with a minimum of product in
>>> the joint. Tooth marks create gaps. Additionally there is a lot of
>>> back and forth talk on starving a joint by squeezing glue out of it.
>>> Glue starvation as it is often called is when there is no or not
>>> enough glue on the surface to begin with not because you had squeeze
>>> out. You get squeeze out because there was too much glue in the
>>> joint to begin with. If you don't get squeeze out you have no
>>> indicator that the joint is tight. I have never had a joint fail
>>> because of too much clamping pressure and causing too much glue to
>>> squeeze out. Remember, a quality glue joint line is one that is
>>> almost invisible.
>>
>> Yeah, there are a lot of old wives' tales in woodworking and those are
>> three of them.
>> Glue doesn't "bite" and holds perfectly fine to "buttery smooth" surface.
>
> Try it with glass.
>
Does the bottle state the product works on glass?
Don't look, I'll tell you. No, it doesn't.
The glass comparison is totally irrelevant.
The glue doesn't work on many many things, but that in no way supports
your "smooth surface" theory.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 4:07 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:48:33 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/14/18 11:22 AM, Leon wrote:
>>> On 1/13/2018 10:56 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:41:57 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so
>>>>>>>> I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the
>>>>>>>> out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the
>>>>>>>> out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I
>>>>>>>> move the board along. At 36" long I have to move my hands
>>>>>>>> and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed edge. I tried to
>>>>>>>> clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because
>>>>>>>> of hand movement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
>>>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap
>>>>>>>> free glue-up?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to
>>>>>>> the top of the board and running a router along the side with
>>>>>>> a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router
>>>>>>> table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different
>>>>>> manner.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well.
>>>>> I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to
>>>>> get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
>>>>
>>>> Join the club! I'm sure I'm doing something wrong too.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can guarantee you that aluminum angle is not straight enough to
>>> form a glue line surface.
>>
>> It's only straight if it's attached to something straight. :-)
>> I think in the article in the link, it's attached to a straight board
>> and hopefully triple checked. I believe the aluminum is there to give
>> the router bit bearing a hard, smooth surface to reference.
>
> But why does the bearing need a surface harder than a board. It's not
> very sharp. ;-)
>
I think it's to protect it from betting bumped or nicked up.
I used hard maple on my dado jig because the surfaces are always
protected by the opposing sides.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 1/14/18 5:58 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:30:15 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/14/18 4:07 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:48:33 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/14/18 11:22 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>> On 1/13/2018 10:56 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 11:41:57 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:11:09 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so
>>>>>>>>>> I can glue up a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the
>>>>>>>>>> out-feed fence 1/16" proud of the in-feed fence.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the
>>>>>>>>>> out-feed fence but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I
>>>>>>>>>> move the board along. At 36" long I have to move my hands
>>>>>>>>>> and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed edge. I tried to
>>>>>>>>>> clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>>>>>>>>>> but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because
>>>>>>>>>> of hand movement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push
>>>>>>>>>> paddles for the entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap
>>>>>>>>>> free glue-up?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to
>>>>>>>>> the top of the board and running a router along the side with
>>>>>>>>> a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router
>>>>>>>>> table for this purpose.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best of luck.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's an option that uses aluminum a slightly different
>>>>>>>> manner.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.finewoodworking.com/2005/10/25/jointing-boards-with-the-router
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've used this method also but I couldn't get it to work as well.
>>>>>>> I can't remember exactly why but I had to make several passes to
>>>>>>> get it perfect. User operator error of some kind, I'm sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Join the club! I'm sure I'm doing something wrong too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I can guarantee you that aluminum angle is not straight enough to
>>>>> form a glue line surface.
>>>>
>>>> It's only straight if it's attached to something straight. :-)
>>>> I think in the article in the link, it's attached to a straight board
>>>> and hopefully triple checked. I believe the aluminum is there to give
>>>> the router bit bearing a hard, smooth surface to reference.
>>>
>>> But why does the bearing need a surface harder than a board. It's not
>>> very sharp. ;-)
>>>
>>
>> I think it's to protect it from betting bumped or nicked up.
>> I used hard maple on my dado jig because the surfaces are always
>> protected by the opposing sides.
>
> Aluminum doesn't dent? I'd go for the maple (or perhaps white oak)
> for a long-term use jig, too.
>
I never said nor implied that it doesn't dent.
I'm guessing it's harder and more stable than oak.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
"DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 1:56:44 PM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
>> There is no need to, left hand holds the work against the outfeed
>> fence, right hand moves it along. Now, if the work were much more than
>> 36"
>> long, you would have to move your right hand but not your left; no
>> matter,
>> left is still holding it where it should be.
>
> I just changed my feed method and hand positions. I did not change my
> fences.
> I was able to joint a 36" board without any bumps.
>
> I was previously holding the board down and against fence with both hands
> on the out-feed side. Even tried paddles. This time, partially based on
> your wording, I installed a feather board to hold the board down and
> placed
> my left hand on the table, keeping pressure on outside edge of the board
> to
> hold it against the out-feed table while moving it with my right.
> Perfectly
> jointed edge.
YAY!. As a refinement, you don't need the featherboard, your left hand can
easily hold it both in and down.
There remains the reason behind your bumps. Even holding it as you
described, there should have been none. For a bump to arise, the board has
to have slightly moved away from the bit, then moved laterally, then
returned to the bit. The simplest explanation is that there was a fulcrum;
ie, the fence halves were not parallel.The other explanation is that you
were physically moving the work to create the bump. In either case, I'd
think the problem would be immediately obvious. Why wasn't it?
"DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Monday, January 15, 2018 at 8:28:15 AM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
>> "DerbyDad03" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 1:56:44 PM UTC-5, dadiOH wrote:
>>
>> >> There is no need to, left hand holds the work against the outfeed
>> >> fence, right hand moves it along. Now, if the work were much more
>> >> than
>> >> 36"
>> >> long, you would have to move your right hand but not your left; no
>> >> matter,
>> >> left is still holding it where it should be.
>> >
>> > I just changed my feed method and hand positions. I did not change my
>> > fences.
>> > I was able to joint a 36" board without any bumps.
>> >
>> > I was previously holding the board down and against fence with both
>> > hands
>> > on the out-feed side. Even tried paddles. This time, partially based on
>> > your wording, I installed a feather board to hold the board down and
>> > placed
>> > my left hand on the table, keeping pressure on outside edge of the
>> > board
>> > to
>> > hold it against the out-feed table while moving it with my right.
>> > Perfectly
>> > jointed edge.
>>
>> YAY!. As a refinement, you don't need the featherboard, your left hand
>> can
>> easily hold it both in and down.
>
> Belt and suspenders. Easily attached, provides peace of mind.
>
>>
>> There remains the reason behind your bumps. Even holding it as you
>> described, there should have been none. For a bump to arise, the board
>> has
>> to have slightly moved away from the bit, then moved laterally, then
>> returned to the bit.
>
> Exactly - as previously stated very early in this thread.
>
>> The simplest explanation is that there was a fulcrum;
>> ie, the fence halves were not parallel.
>
> I'm not sure why you keep going back to the fences. In the post you just
> responded to I stated that I did not have to adjust the fences to
> eliminate
> the bumps. It was all caused by improper hand positioning.
Because if the fences were parallel and you kept the work against the fence
when changing hands you should not have made a bump. If they were NOT
parallel there would be a fulcrum; if you applied greater/lesser pressure
toward the fence on the work piece on one side or the other of the fulcrum,
you'd get a bump; if you applied pressure correctly, no bump even if the
fences were less than parallel.
IOW, holding as you did should not cause a bump.
>> The other explanation is that you
>> were physically moving the work to create the bump.
>
> See your "For a bump to arise" sentence above. Also, that fact was
> previously
> stated very early in this thread.
>
>> In either case, I'd
>> think the problem would be immediately obvious. Why wasn't it?
>
> It was. Why do you think I started this thread?
I should have said, "In either case, I'd think the SOLUTION would be
immediately obvious."
On 1/15/2018 10:16 AM, dadiOH wrote:
> f the fences were parallel and you kept the work against the fence
> when changing hands you should not have made a bump. If they were NOT
Assuming the fences are positioned correctly, and the pressure is
corrrect whether held to the fence manually or with feather boards,
there may be a speed factor. If you move the piece through the bit too
fast, as the densities of the wood change ie knots, the bumps may be
created as the piece moves away from the fence as the bit cuts around
the denser wood.
I know I have problems with bumps because of unknown knots in the wood.
--
2017: The year we learn to play the great game of Euchre
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:05:06 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 10:06:05 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 16:21:56 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>> >> On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 5:42:02 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> >> > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 6:07:52 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>> >> > > On Saturday, January 13, 2018 at 3:10:56 PM UTC-6, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> >> > > > I'm trying to joint some 1 x 8 poplar on my router table so I can glue up
>> >> > > > a panel. Each piece is 36" long. I have the out-feed fence 1/16" proud of
>> >> > > > the in-feed fence.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > I understand that you are supposed to keep pressure on the out-feed fence
>> >> > > > but I can't seem to keep even pressure as I move the board along. At 36"
>> >> > > > long I have to move my hands and when I do, I get a bump in the jointed
>> >> > > > edge. I tried to clamp 2 feather boards to the table on the out-feed side,
>> >> > > > but I'm still getting 2-3 bumps on the jointed edge because of hand
>> >> > > > movement.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Neither fence nor the table is long enough to use push paddles for the
>> >> > > > entire 36". Is that part of the problem?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Is there any way to get rid of the bumps so I can do a gap free glue-up?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I have had good results clamping an aluminum straight edge to the top of the board and running a router along the side with a longish bit. I don't think I'd want to try using the router table for this purpose.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Best of luck.
>> >> >
>> >> > That is an option and may be my next step. However, jointing on a router
>> >> > table is fairly common. I suspect my long boards relative to the fence
>> >> > may be the issue. I'm fine most of the time, but all it takes is a just
>> >> > a little less pressure on out-feed fence to cause the bump.
>> >> >
>> >> > https://derbydad03.imgur.com/all/
>> >> >
>> >> > See here for one of many vids on jointing with a router table.
>> >> >
>> >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6nql7mlSOo
>> >>
>> >> I am curious. Are you not able to glue from the table saw rips?
>> >
>> >It is my understanding that the best glue-ups come via this process:
>> >
>> >1 - Joint one edge to make it perfect straight and square
>> >2 - Rip the board parallel on the TS with the jointed edge against the fence
>>
>> 2a - Make sure you've used your Glue Line Rip blade.
>>
>> >3 - Very lightly joint the ripped edge to remove any saw marks.
>>
>> Nope. No saw marks needed. See 2a (above).
>>
>> >My table saw leaves a very clean edge, but my router table leaves a edge
>> >that is buttery smooth.
>>
>> Not the best for a glue up.
>
>So you're saying that jointing with a router should be avoided?
No, just that a table saw, properly set up, is good enough.
>Why are there so many articles and videos from so many sources detailing the technique?
I have no idea. Maybe because if all you have a hammer, the entire
world looks like a screw?
However, the point I was trying to make was that a glass-like surface
may not be best for a (wood) glue joint.