Joints - Really Good Ones

On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 4:14:50 PM UTC-4, Leon wrote:
> On 3/28/2019 3:14 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > I'm not impressed. All of my joints look like these.
> >
> > https://twitter.com/MothershipSG/status/1110019423803334657?s=19
> >
>
> Here is my version. ;~)
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/46765197084/in/dateposted/

Not quite invisible, but not bad. ;-)

One of the comments at the Twitter site used the word 'nerdgasm'. :-)

Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> on Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:09:51 -0500 typed
in rec.woodworking the following:
>On 3/29/2019 6:16 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 4:14:50 PM UTC-4, Leon wrote:
>>> On 3/28/2019 3:14 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>> I'm not impressed. All of my joints look like these.
>>>>
>>>> https://twitter.com/MothershipSG/status/1110019423803334657?s=19
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here is my version. ;~)
>>>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/46765197084/in/dateposted/
>>
>> Not quite invisible, but not bad. ;-)
>>
>> One of the comments at the Twitter site used the word 'nerdgasm'. :-)
>>
>
>
>I got to thinking about those metal pieces fitting together. This is
>probably not the case but the inside undulations, peeks/valleys, high
>points and low points did not have to be anywhere close to fitting.
>They are totally hidden.

True. But the impression is that "yes, the invisible parts are
just as precise as the visible ones.
--
pyotr filipivich
Next month's Panel: Graft - Boon or blessing?

On 3/28/2019 3:14 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> I'm not impressed. All of my joints look like these.
>
> https://twitter.com/MothershipSG/status/1110019423803334657?s=19
>

Here is my version. ;~)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/46765197084/in/dateposted/

On 3/28/2019 4:14 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> I'm not impressed. All of my joints look like these.
>
> https://twitter.com/MothershipSG/status/1110019423803334657?s=19
>


I don't get it. All you have to do is mark with a sharp pencil and you
can easily do that every time.

DerbyDad03 <[email protected]> on Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:14:07 -0700
(PDT) typed in rec.woodworking the following:
>I'm not impressed. All of my joints look like these.
>
>https://twitter.com/MothershipSG/status/1110019423803334657?s=19

If you don't "break" the edges, sure ...
--
pyotr filipivich
Next month's Panel: Graft - Boon or blessing?

On 3/29/2019 6:16 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 4:14:50 PM UTC-4, Leon wrote:
>> On 3/28/2019 3:14 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> I'm not impressed. All of my joints look like these.
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/MothershipSG/status/1110019423803334657?s=19
>>>
>>
>> Here is my version. ;~)
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/46765197084/in/dateposted/
>
> Not quite invisible, but not bad. ;-)
>
> One of the comments at the Twitter site used the word 'nerdgasm'. :-)
>


I got to thinking about those metal pieces fitting together. This is
probably not the case but the inside undulations, peeks/valleys, high
points and low points did not have to be anywhere close to fitting.
They are totally hidden.