On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:24:34 -0600, "Don Dando"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>I'd be concerned the weight of the contents could pull the cabinets from the
>wall. I'd be inclined to make a 1X4 base for them to set on then there is
>never a concern about loading them or what get sets on top of them.
Is there some reason that you don't want to use "reply group" and
instead start a new thread every time?
Don, are you changing the subject of your replies or what. It makes
the threads a whole lot easier to read (at least for me) if you
"reply" w/o changing the title. Then I can follow the discussion.....
I know a lot of people, including me, misspell things so it is
tempting to say it right....
On Jan 31, 5:24 pm, "Don Dando" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd be concerned the weight of the contents could pull the cabinets from the
> wall. I'd be inclined to make a 1X4 base for them to set on then there is
> never a concern about loading them or what get sets on top of them.
>
> Don Dando
"CW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why do people waste time on this guy? He has been doing this for years. He
> will not answer your inquiries as to why. He will not stop. He has been in
> my kilfile for some time now. I suggest you do the same.
>
Just the person I want to talk to and I am changing the subject.
CW, what file to I need to restore/save to restore my AutoCAD LT tool bars
and their locations?
If I reinstalled AutoCAD LT I would have to set up custom tool bars and
their locations again. Do you know which file/files keep this info?
Thank you
Leon.
"J. Clarke" wrote in message
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:24:34 -0600, "Don Dando"
> < wrote:
>
> >I'd be concerned the weight of the contents could pull the cabinets from
the
> >wall. I'd be inclined to make a 1X4 base for them to set on then there
is
> >never a concern about loading them or what get sets on top of them.
>
> Is there some reason that you don't want to use "reply group" and
> instead start a new thread every time?
>
It's not just here:
http://tinyurl.com/2ydh3c
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 1/27/07
Why do people waste time on this guy? He has been doing this for years. He
will not answer your inquiries as to why. He will not stop. He has been in
my kilfile for some time now. I suggest you do the same.
"Never Enough Money" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Don, are you changing the subject of your replies or what. It makes
> the threads a whole lot easier to read (at least for me) if you
> "reply" w/o changing the title. Then I can follow the discussion.....
>
> I know a lot of people, including me, misspell things so it is
> tempting to say it right....
>
> On Jan 31, 5:24 pm, "Don Dando" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'd be concerned the weight of the contents could pull the cabinets from
the
> > wall. I'd be inclined to make a 1X4 base for them to set on then there
is
> > never a concern about loading them or what get sets on top of them.
> >
> > Don Dando
>
>
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:28:49 -0600, Markem
<markem(sixoneeight)@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:11:26 -0500, J. Clarke <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:24:34 -0600, "Don Dando"
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>I'd be concerned the weight of the contents could pull the cabinets from the
>>>wall. I'd be inclined to make a 1X4 base for them to set on then there is
>>>never a concern about loading them or what get sets on top of them.
>>
>>Is there some reason that you don't want to use "reply group" and
>>instead start a new thread every time?
>
>He is posting through SBC using Microsoft OE.
Which is why I mentioned specifically "reply group"--that is the name
of the button in OE which replies to the group instead of posting a
new message.
>I doubt computer literacy is his strong point.
>
>But it is a tad annoying.
>
>Mark
>http://home.mchsi.com/~xphome/
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:11:26 -0500, J. Clarke <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:24:34 -0600, "Don Dando"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I'd be concerned the weight of the contents could pull the cabinets from the
>>wall. I'd be inclined to make a 1X4 base for them to set on then there is
>>never a concern about loading them or what get sets on top of them.
>
>Is there some reason that you don't want to use "reply group" and
>instead start a new thread every time?
He is posting through SBC using Microsoft OE.
I doubt computer literacy is his strong point.
But it is a tad annoying.
Mark
http://home.mchsi.com/~xphome/
"Never Enough Money" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Don, are you changing the subject of your replies or what. It makes
> the threads a whole lot easier to read (at least for me) if you
> "reply" w/o changing the title. Then I can follow the discussion.....
>
> I know a lot of people, including me, misspell things so it is
> tempting to say it right....
>
> On Jan 31, 5:24 pm, "Don Dando" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'd be concerned the weight of the contents could pull the cabinets from
>> the
>> wall. I'd be inclined to make a 1X4 base for them to set on then there
>> is
>> never a concern about loading them or what get sets on top of them.
>>
>> Don Dando
Don't feed the trolls.......especially the stupid ones.
--
"Anybody can have more birthdays; but it takes
balls to get old!"