A lumberyard about 3 hours away from me is advertising African Cherry for
$2/bf. From what I have read, it is a great wood except for a high silica
content.
Has anyone used this wood, or even seen it?
I am making a cabinet to go in room where everything else is teak. I was
planning on cherry, but for the price, this seems too good to pass up. It
it chews up a few router bits it is still cheap.
"toller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>A lumberyard about 3 hours away from me is advertising African Cherry
Sounds to me like you're talking about makore.
Is this the stuff?
http://www.hobbithouseinc.com/personal/woodpics/makore.htm
VK
"Vito Kuhn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "toller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>A lumberyard about 3 hours away from me is advertising African Cherry
>
> Sounds to me like you're talking about makore.
>
> Is this the stuff?
>
> http://www.hobbithouseinc.com/personal/woodpics/makore.htm
>
> VK
I haven't seen it, but the stuff is called mubango.
They also have makore, both plain and figured, but it is rather more
expensive; and I am not looking for really brittle wood. I have enough
trouble with hickory.
When Googled African cherry consistently comes back with
makore in brackets (makore). I'd always thought makore to
be more mahogany like in color (colour David) but I suppose
it's size of the pore that might be driving this naming.
During my very brief stint in the architectural stone
business I was amazed how many stones had names given to
them by a particular quarry or distributor even though they
were nothing more than a stone of a name long recognized by
the whole world (it was/is a marketing thing). It looks
like we're into that here now with a lot of the "new to us"
imports with names like African cherry.
UA100
Mark & Juanita wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2005 06:44:11 +0100, "Vito Kuhn" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "toller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> A lumberyard about 3 hours away from me is advertising African
>>> Cherry
>>
>> Sounds to me like you're talking about makore.
>>
>> Is this the stuff?
>>
>> http://www.hobbithouseinc.com/personal/woodpics/makore.htm
>>
>> VK
>
> That's quite a collection of makore, some of the grain is amazing.
> When the statement is made "very brittle and subject to tear-out",
> does that imply a workability similar to luan? or is it better than
> that? The stuff looks pretty, but the idea of working with something
> that splinters just because you look at it cross-eyed wouldn't be
> much fun.
It has been many years since I've used makore but I don't recall it
being particularly hard to work. (I have no trouble at all with hickory
either which someone else mentioned).
It is hard to compare anything to "lauan"/Phillipine mahogany as it is
pretty much a generic term. There are at least four woods sold as same:
one is light, soft and works well; another is also light, much harder
and is terrible...splits, checks, splinters, tear out; still another is
light-medium red/brown, fairly soft and works well; the last is
medium-dark red/brown, harder and works well.
--
dadiOH
____________________________
dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
...a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico
On 19 Mar 2005 06:44:11 +0100, "Vito Kuhn" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"toller" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>A lumberyard about 3 hours away from me is advertising African Cherry
>
>Sounds to me like you're talking about makore.
>
>Is this the stuff?
>
>http://www.hobbithouseinc.com/personal/woodpics/makore.htm
>
>VK
That's quite a collection of makore, some of the grain is amazing. When
the statement is made "very brittle and subject to tear-out", does that
imply a workability similar to luan? or is it better than that? The stuff
looks pretty, but the idea of working with something that splinters just
because you look at it cross-eyed wouldn't be much fun.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The absence of accidents does not mean the presence of safety
Army General Richard Cody
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+