Guess who <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:53:58 -0500, "Mike Marlow"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Guess who" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> >
> >> Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
> >> severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
> >> we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:
> >
> >Not quite. Look again - aspiration, not inhalation. It's talking about
> >breathing in the liquid.
>
> I realised that as I was writing it. However, I also realised that it
> was fairly synonymous. To "aspirate" is to "breath in". That also
> implies inhilation. If you inhale under water, you will aspirate the
> water into your lungs. Aspiration can also refer to transfer of a
> gas. ...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
You are ignoring that the passage uses inhalation and aspiration quite
separately and very specifically. Add that aspiration is under Ingestion
and not under inhalation and it is clear that Mike is correct.
Me, I would wear gloves when using it and if using a lot or for a long
time a respirator (I already wear glasses).
Peter
--
Add my middle initial to email me. It has become attached to a country
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:53:06 -0600, "Henry St.Pierre"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:[email protected]:
>
>> It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
>> <novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Ingestion:
>>>Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."
>>
>> OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.
>>
>
>A decent malmsey I pray.
Nay, not for Larry, butt for Clarence.
Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:20:07 -0800, Larry Jaques <novalidaddress@di> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:25:24 GMT, the inscrutable "Steven and Gail
> Peterson" <[email protected]> spake:
>
>>http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSDSs/MSAcetone.html#anchor948065
>
> Whoever said it would kill you if you used it to get glue off your
> hands should read this portion from the MSDS:
>
> "Ingestion:
> Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."
> 'Nuff said?
Well, _I_ thought it was, yes. Also, the antidote for it's
skin contact hazards seems to be...lotion.
"Guess who" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >
> Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
> severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
> we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:
Not quite. Look again - aspiration, not inhalation. It's talking about
breathing in the liquid.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
>
> Inhalation:
> Inhalation of vapors irritates the respiratory tract. May cause
> coughing, dizziness, dullness, and headache. Higher concentrations can
> produce central nervous system depression, narcosis, and
> unconsciousness.
> Ingestion:
> Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects.
> Ingestion of larger amounts may produce abdominal pain, nausea and
> vomiting. Aspiration into lungs can produce severe lung damage and is
> a medical emergency. Other symptoms are expected to parallel
> inhalation.
> Skin Contact:
> Irritating due to defatting action on skin. Causes redness, pain,
> drying and cracking of the skin.
> Eye Contact:
> Vapors are irritating to the eyes. Splashes may cause severe
> irritation, with stinging, tearing, redness and pain.
> Chronic Exposure:
> Prolonged or repeated skin contact may produce severe irritation or
> dermatitis.
> Aggravation of Pre-existing Conditions:
> Use of alcoholic beverages enhances toxic effects. Exposure may
> increase the toxic potential of chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as
> chloroform, trichloroethane.
>
"Andy Dingley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
> <novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>
> >"Ingestion:
> >Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."
>
> OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.
>
Now *that* would be aspiration!
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:29:13 -0500, Mike Marlow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "Andy Dingley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
>> <novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>>
>> >"Ingestion:
>> >Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."
>>
>> OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.
>
> Now *that* would be aspiration!
Well yes, but asphyxiation would be the immediate cause of death...
You have to remember this is the BU*H E.P.A. and all of the dangerous
wording has most likely been taken out to benefit the corporations.......
--
Rumpty
Radial Arm Saw Forum: http://forums.delphiforums.com/woodbutcher/start
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Steven and Gail Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSDSs/MSAcetone.html#anchor948065
>
>
"Rumpty" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> You have to remember this is the BU*H E.P.A. and all of the dangerous
> wording has most likely been taken out to benefit the corporations.......
>
Snicker.
The EPA doesn't do MSDSs.
You're really a case....
>
>
> "Steven and Gail Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSDSs/MSAcetone.html#anchor948065
> >
> >
>
>
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:53:58 -0500, "Mike Marlow"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Guess who" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
>> severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
>> we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:
>
>Not quite. Look again - aspiration, not inhalation. It's talking about
>breathing in the liquid.
I realised that as I was writing it. However, I also realised that it
was fairly synonymous. To "aspirate" is to "breath in". That also
implies inhilation. If you inhale under water, you will aspirate the
water into your lungs. Aspiration can also refer to transfer of a
gas. ...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:20:07 -0800, Larry Jaques
<novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:25:24 GMT, the inscrutable "Steven and Gail
>Peterson" <[email protected]> spake:
>
>>http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSDSs/MSAcetone.html#anchor948065
>
>Whoever said it would kill you if you used it to get glue off your
>hands should read this portion from the MSDS:
>
>"Ingestion:
>Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."
>
>'Nuff said?
Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:
Inhalation:
Inhalation of vapors irritates the respiratory tract. May cause
coughing, dizziness, dullness, and headache. Higher concentrations can
produce central nervous system depression, narcosis, and
unconsciousness.
Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects.
Ingestion of larger amounts may produce abdominal pain, nausea and
vomiting. Aspiration into lungs can produce severe lung damage and is
a medical emergency. Other symptoms are expected to parallel
inhalation.
Skin Contact:
Irritating due to defatting action on skin. Causes redness, pain,
drying and cracking of the skin.
Eye Contact:
Vapors are irritating to the eyes. Splashes may cause severe
irritation, with stinging, tearing, redness and pain.
Chronic Exposure:
Prolonged or repeated skin contact may produce severe irritation or
dermatitis.
Aggravation of Pre-existing Conditions:
Use of alcoholic beverages enhances toxic effects. Exposure may
increase the toxic potential of chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as
chloroform, trichloroethane.
In article <[email protected]>, "Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Guess who" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
>> severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
>> we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:
>
>Not quite. Look again - aspiration, not inhalation. It's talking about
>breathing in the liquid.
>
Yep. Even water is dangerous if you breathe the liquid.
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
Nobody ever left footprints in the sands of time by sitting on his butt.
And who wants to leave buttprints in the sands of time?
Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
> <novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>
>>"Ingestion:
>>Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."
>
> OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.
>
A decent malmsey I pray.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:38:54 GMT, "Mark Howell"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Steven and Gail Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSDSs/MSAcetone.html#anchor948065
>>
>>
>
>Wow, acetone seems docile compared to this nasty stuff:
>
>http://www.dhmo.org/msdsdhmo.html
>
Thanks. We needed that. :-)
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:43:28 -0500, Tom Watson <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Nay, not for Larry, butt for Clarence.
I'm curious as to just how many people will get that.
--
LRod
Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite
Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999
http://www.woodbutcher.net
Rumpty wrote:
> You have to remember this is the BU*H E.P.A. and all of the dangerous
> wording has most likely been taken out to benefit the corporations.......
>
> --
>
> Rumpty
Somehow I doubt that the wording of every MSDS on Earth has been changed to
suit the preferences of the President.
And the Canadian government doesn't seem to think it's particularly
dangerous either.
> Radial Arm Saw Forum: http://forums.delphiforums.com/woodbutcher/start
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
> "Steven and Gail Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSDSs/MSAcetone.html#anchor948065
>>
>>
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 03:39:00 +0000, LRod
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:43:28 -0500, Tom Watson <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>Nay, not for Larry, butt for Clarence.
>
>I'm curious as to just how many people will get that.
Caviar to the general?
Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)
"Steven and Gail Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSDSs/MSAcetone.html#anchor948065
>
>
Wow, acetone seems docile compared to this nasty stuff:
http://www.dhmo.org/msdsdhmo.html
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:53:06 -0600, "Henry St.Pierre"
<[email protected]> scribbled:
>Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:[email protected]:
>
>> It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
>> <novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Ingestion:
>>>Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."
>>
>> OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.
>
>A decent malmsey I pray.
Waste of cheap sweet wine. Stick to acetone, a whiff of which I have
more than once experienced in a number of people's prized home-made
vino, not to speak of some commercial offerings. Hmmm. I wonder if
cheap wine could be used to remove gorilla glue stains. And it does
damage the liver . . .
Luigi
Replace "nonet" with "yukonomics" for real email address
www.yukonomics.ca/wooddorking/humour.html
www.yukonomics.ca/wooddorking/antifaq.html
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:25:24 GMT, the inscrutable "Steven and Gail
Peterson" <[email protected]> spake:
>http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSDSs/MSAcetone.html#anchor948065
Whoever said it would kill you if you used it to get glue off your
hands should read this portion from the MSDS:
"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."
'Nuff said?
--
EAT SOYLENT McD!
----------------------
http://diversify.com People-free Websites