Tue, Oct 7, 2003, 10:24am (EDT-3) [email protected]
(Phil=A0Foreskin) who posts his troll posts in this, and several other
newsgroups, claims:
He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as SPAM.
ROTFLMAO You are so silly. Never denied posting subjects in caps.
The claim before was that I POST in caps. That must have been you, in a
previous troll life, right? But, if it really, really, bothers you,
then report me to the group moderator.
Buttercup, Buttercup, Buttercup. One could almost feel sorry for
you - except for the history of your other posts. You really should try
learning some social skills, it would really make your life so much more
fulfilling, and enjoyable.
--------------090408080601030605020002
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Unsolicited? No, we ask him to, thank him an encourage him to. We like
> his subjects to stand out too.
I don't even need to filter your posts. They are so easy to ignore just
when I go through the newsgroup. And if it wern't you, it would just be
somebody else. It is sort of the circle of life. There will always be
jerks around and that is a fact. Like rude and bade drivers on the
roads. When some grow up and improve, others will take their place. So I
just laugh about it and shrug it off.. After you, somebody else will
come along. That is how pointless your efforts are. How is it going in
the other newsgroups you pollute? Did you chase steve out of rec photo
digital? I hope you find something to boost your self esteem. That means
"self image". Please tell me about all your internet exploits and your
rationale behind them.
>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] says...
>
>
>>He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
>>posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as
>>SPAM.
>>
>>
>>
>>
--------------090408080601030605020002
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<blockquote type="cite">Unsolicited? No, we ask him to, thank him an encourage
him to. We like his subjects to stand out too.</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I don't even need to filter your posts. They are so easy to ignore just when
I go through the newsgroup. And if it wern't you, it would just be somebody
else. It is sort of the circle of life. There will always be jerks around
and that is a fact. Like rude and bade drivers on the roads. When some grow
up and improve, others will take their place. So I just laugh about it and
shrug it off.. After you, somebody else will come along. That is how pointless
your efforts are. How is it going in the other newsgroups you pollute? Did
you chase steve out of rec photo digital? I hope you find something to boost
your self esteem. That means "self image". Please tell me about all your
internet exploits and your rationale behind them.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="[email protected]">
<pre wrap="">In article <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:[email protected]"><[email protected]></a>,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> says...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as
SPAM.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="[email protected]">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!----></pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------090408080601030605020002--
Twit filter on.
"Phil Foreskin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
> posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as
> SPAM.
>He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
>posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as
>SPAM.
Don't get your panties in a wad. I'm glad he posts - I've seen some
great projects that I have tried and hope to try in the future and it
sure saves a lot of time looking. Hope he keeps up the good work.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Tom) wrote:
>
>>He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
>>posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as
>>SPAM.
>
>Don't get your panties in a wad. I'm glad he posts - I've seen some
>great projects that I have tried and hope to try in the future and it
>sure saves a lot of time looking. Hope he keeps up the good work.
Please don't feed the trolls.
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
Plonk!
"Phil Foreskin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
> posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as
> SPAM.
Phil Foreskin wrote:
> He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
> posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as
> SPAM.
actually...you are spamming and JOAT is not:
from the Computer Jargon dictionary:
> Originally a name for mass postings to Usenet newsgroups advertising products
> or services, regardless of their relevance to the newsgroup.
from dictionary.com:
> 1. To send unsolicited e-mail to.
> 2. To send (a message) indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals,
or newsgroups.
--
************************************
Chris Merrill
[email protected]
(remove the ZZZ to contact me)
************************************
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
> posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as
> SPAM.
>
Yeah, and you are trolling again...
In article <[email protected]>,
Phil Foreskin <[email protected]> wrote:
>He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
>posts) and
He was accused of posting in all caps - and correctly denied that.
I've never heard that writing the subject in caps is considered to be
spam (let alone be proof.)
>he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as SPAM.
Taint so. (In fact *many* valid posts include unsolicited URL's.)
IMHO all you've done is shown your own ignorance.
--
--henry schaffer
[email protected]
[email protected] (Phil Foreskin) writes:
> He posts subjects in all caps (denied this, but the proof is in the
> posts) and he posts UNSOLICITED WEBSITE URL'S. This is defined as
> SPAM.
This is a woodworking group. He's posting woodworking urls. People
come here looking for woodworking stuff, therefor his posts are not
unsolicited. Besides, by your definition, anyone who posts a "hey,
what do you think of my latest project? http://..." posting would be
spamming. To consider yours a valid definition of spam here would be
daft.
Besides, if you look up the definition of spam, you'll note that none
of the variants matches what Joat actually does.
1 - no program involved
2 - his messages are generally relevent
3 - he is only sending one of each
4 - likewise
5 - mail is not involved
6 - his posts are neither long nor prolific