In article <[email protected]>, Alan W
<[email protected]> wrote:
> unable to get to the site,
> unable to ping them
> unable to resolve the name
> go daddy says they are still there.
There's something going on in Canada on the net. I had no connection at
all a while ago, and still can't ping the office (producer.com).
I can get to Lee Valley as of 10:53 CST.
"Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Alan W" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > unable to get to the site,
> > unable to ping them
> > unable to resolve the name
> > go daddy says they are still there.
>
> Do we really need to waste the bandwidth of this conference
troubleshooting
> someone's ISP problems? In variably this types of knee-jerk reports are
> local issues.
>
> Grouchy-in-Houston
> Bob
No kidding. By my estimates, we've eaten up ALMOST 10K already! I mean,
good Lord, when will it end? For dial-up users, it would take nearly THREE
SECONDS on average to download the thread to this point. Consider the
boredom of the poor modem user who has to find some way of passing the time
while his newsreader downloads this bandwidth-hogging thread. We can only
hope that Alan has not prevented the mother of a sick child from being able
to order an online prescription after unleashing this internet-clogging
thread.
todd
"Todd Fatheree" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> No kidding. By my estimates, we've eaten up ALMOST 10K already! I mean,
> good Lord, when will it end? For dial-up users, it would take nearly
THREE
> SECONDS on average to download the thread to this point. Consider the
> boredom of the poor modem user who has to find some way of passing the
time
> while his newsreader downloads this bandwidth-hogging thread.
Its not about *technical* bandwidth. Sorry you wasted your time doing all
the calculations.
Bob
In case of emergency go to Lie-Nielsen.com and breath deeply. Tool porn can
be a dangerous thing when handled recklessly
"Alan W" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> unable to get to the site,
> unable to ping them
> unable to resolve the name
> go daddy says they are still there.
>
> Alan
"Alan W" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> unable to get to the site,
> unable to ping them
> unable to resolve the name
> go daddy says they are still there.
Do we really need to waste the bandwidth of this conference troubleshooting
someone's ISP problems? In variably this types of knee-jerk reports are
local issues.
Grouchy-in-Houston
Bob
"Alan W" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> unable to get to the site,
> unable to ping them
> unable to resolve the name
> go daddy says they are still there.
>
> Alan
I'm having no trouble now.
todd
No. It's about somebody not being able to get into the LV website.
Certainly a serious problem for anybody and must be rectified asap!
John
What's band width? Music or something?
Bob wrote:
> "Todd Fatheree" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>
>>No kidding. By my estimates, we've eaten up ALMOST 10K already! I mean,
>>good Lord, when will it end? For dial-up users, it would take nearly
>
> THREE
>
>>SECONDS on average to download the thread to this point. Consider the
>>boredom of the poor modem user who has to find some way of passing the
>
> time
>
>>while his newsreader downloads this bandwidth-hogging thread.
>
>
> Its not about *technical* bandwidth. Sorry you wasted your time doing all
> the calculations.
>
> Bob
>
>
"Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Todd Fatheree" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > No kidding. By my estimates, we've eaten up ALMOST 10K already! I
mean,
> > good Lord, when will it end? For dial-up users, it would take nearly
> THREE
> > SECONDS on average to download the thread to this point. Consider the
> > boredom of the poor modem user who has to find some way of passing the
> time
> > while his newsreader downloads this bandwidth-hogging thread.
>
> Its not about *technical* bandwidth. Sorry you wasted your time doing all
> the calculations.
>
> Bob
Don't worry. I took me about the same three seconds to do all the
calculations. Did I wander into rec.woodworking.moderated by mistake? The
original post was at least tangentially related to woodworking, so please be
some other group's nanny.
todd
>There's something going on in Canada on the net. I had no connection at
all a while ago, and still can't ping the office (producer.com).
Your CAD is getting too strong, Alan Greenspan has cut you off!
--
Rumpty
Radial Arm Saw Forum: http://forums.delphiforums.com/woodbutcher/start
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Dave Balderstone" <dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_S.balderstone.ca> wrote in message
news:211120042254060638%dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_S.balderstone.ca...
> In article <[email protected]>, Alan W
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > unable to get to the site,
> > unable to ping them
> > unable to resolve the name
> > go daddy says they are still there.
>
> There's something going on in Canada on the net. I had no connection at
> all a while ago, and still can't ping the office (producer.com).
>
> I can get to Lee Valley as of 10:53 CST.
On 21 Nov 2004 20:48:24 -0800, [email protected] (Alan W) wrote:
>unable to get to the site,
>unable to ping them
>unable to resolve the name
>go daddy says they are still there.
>
>Alan
Site responding at 10:02 PST
Tom Veatch
Wichita, KS USA
"Alan W" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> unable to get to the site,
> unable to ping them
> unable to resolve the name
> go daddy says they are still there.
>
> Alan
Oh, and if you can't even resolve the name, it's probably a problem with
your ISP's DNS servers. To see, try navigating to http://207.35.224.158.
That's the IP address that www.leevalley.com resolves to.
tod
They have probably been bought out by China and a new server is being
installed....
--
Rumpty
Radial Arm Saw Forum: http://forums.delphiforums.com/woodbutcher/start
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Alan W" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> unable to get to the site,
> unable to ping them
> unable to resolve the name
> go daddy says they are still there.
>
> Alan