skeezics wrote:
> I didnt take the test! just looked a lot!!! my scroll finger is too
> sore to get to the shop now! BTW Who gives a s@@t whats real? they are
> all real on the outside. whats inside doesnt get tasted anywho!
> lmao...
>
You remind me of a fraternity brother..."What do you mean, fake
breasts? If I can TOUCH 'em...they're REAL."
"Leon" wrote in message
>
> "Swingman" wrote in message
> >
> > "Doug Miller" wrote in message
> >
> >> 17 out of 20 correct....
> >
> > 14 out of 20 correct ... but without tactile input, artistry can even
fool
> > the experts.
>
> Hockey. I got 16 out of 20 with one eye closed. ;~) However it would
have
> been more fun with the touchy feely method added.
SWMBO got 16 out of 20 also ... you must be in better touch with your
feminine side than me. ;)
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 12/13/05
Those of us who enjoyed this site will really like:
www.ratemyrack.com
It gives the old phrase "..just checkin' the score, honey..." new
meaning.
My personal fave is "beachgirl".
-Zz
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:12:54 GMT, John B
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
>http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
>regards
>John
In article <[email protected]>,
Zz Yzx <[email protected]> wrote:
> WARNING!!
>
> View them "by score", and stick to the HIGH scores.
>
> The low scores are downright spooky and could set you off your feed.
>
> -Zz
Ohhh ... thank you.
When they legalized topless beach wear in Ontario, the ones that took advantage
of that always seem to have brush-cuts, carry trucker wallets, comfortable shoes
and had EAT ME tattooed on their knuckles....and stretch marks which made them
look they had a head-on collision with an accordion.
The lemonade-type stand I put up at the beach, proclaiming on a large sign:
"Application Of Suntan Lotion Only $5.00" didn't work too well, till I offered
to pay $10.00.
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:12:54 GMT, John B
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
>http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
>regards
>John
I didnt take the test! just looked a lot!!! my scroll finger is too
sore to get to the shop now! BTW Who gives a s@@t whats real? they are
all real on the outside. whats inside doesnt get tasted anywho!
lmao...
skeez [ whos scroll button is stuck in the up down position ]
John B wrote:
> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
> regards
> John
17/20 most were pretty good anyway.
--
Thank you,
"Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor
man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard." Ecclesiastes 9:16
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:56:17 -0500, "Upscale" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>
>One thing I noticed after looking at my score, was that the ones that were
>most symmetrical in size and shape (forget about size for now) had the best
>chance of being altered.
>
Being from Vegas I was able to get 18 out of 20 (first time), second
time another 18 out of 20, third time 16 out of 20 (had dirty
glasses?), fourth time 19 out of 20, still trying for 20 out of 20 but
working on it!
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> SWMBO got 16 out of 20 also ... you must be in better touch with your
> feminine side than me. ;)
LOL.. Yea-yuh, I muth be.
On 2006/2/21 7:12 AM, "John B" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
Thanks for the entertainment.
19 correct out of 20. # 9 fooled me.
"John B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
> regards
> John
It took me quite a while to get past #12 but eventually did. Scored 17!
See you guys later, I'm going back to #12 for a while.
"John B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
> regards
> John
17 out of 20!
"Greg G." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> LMAO - 18 out of 20
>
> and I think number 18 are man-breasts on a drag queen.
>
How would you know??? ???? ????
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Doug Miller" wrote in message
>
>> 17 out of 20 correct....
>
> 14 out of 20 correct ... but without tactile input, artistry can even fool
> the experts.
Hockey. I got 16 out of 20 with one eye closed. ;~) However it would have
been more fun with the touchy feely method added.
"Old Grey" wrote in message
> Being from Vegas I was able to get 18 out of 20 (first time), second
> time another 18 out of 20, third time 16 out of 20 (had dirty
> glasses?), fourth time 19 out of 20, still trying for 20 out of 20 but
> working on it!
The second time I got 39 out of 40 ...
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 12/13/05
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> 14 out of 20 correct ... but without tactile input, artistry can even fool
> the experts.
One thing I noticed after looking at my score, was that the ones that were
most symmetrical in size and shape (forget about size for now) had the best
chance of being altered.
I once had a girlfriend who fretted over the fact that one was noticeably
bigger than the other. While I was always unable to see it, I usually
offered to work on the smaller one with the intent to make it bigger to
match its companion. <g>
Upscale wrote:
> "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>>14 out of 20 correct ... but without tactile input, artistry can even fool
>>the experts.
>
>
> One thing I noticed after looking at my score, was that the ones that were
> most symmetrical in size and shape (forget about size for now) had the best
> chance of being altered.
>
> I once had a girlfriend who fretted over the fact that one was noticeably
> bigger than the other. While I was always unable to see it, I usually
> offered to work on the smaller one with the intent to make it bigger to
> match its companion. <g>
Very important work. And consider that Saul Bellow wrote that if you
don't pay lots of attention to the breasts they get cancer in protest.
If you love her, you know what to do.
er
--
email not valid
Doug Miller wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, John B
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>>
>> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
> 17 out of 20 correct....
As a healthcare professional, I fancy I have better powers of observation than
the average man. However, I scored 17 out of 20 myself. There were two fakes I
thought were real and one real I thought was fake.
Obviously more study is required on my part.
--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
[email protected]
18 out of 20 right.
Hmmmm....
For sale: slightly used woodworking tools... :-)
--jeff
"Sweet Sawdust" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think I'll stick to wood working. 14 out of 20 right.
>
> "John B" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>>
>> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>>
>> regards
>> John
>
>
>
skeezics wrote:
> I didnt take the test! just looked a lot!!! my scroll finger is
> too sore to get to the shop now! BTW Who gives a s@@t whats real?
> they are all real on the outside. whats inside doesnt get tasted
> anywho! lmao...
>
> skeez [ whos scroll button is stuck in the up down position ]
Well, when you're young, you're just happy to see a boob... any
boob... and it's all good.
When you get a little older your tastes mature. The "jello mold" look
just doesn't do it. You begin to appreciate the beauty of natural
boobs in all their variety.
Plus, to me, there's something that seems just plain wrong about
cutting into a beautiful young healthy body simply for vanities sake.
My real contempt is for the plastic surgeons that earn a fine living
performing this needless surgery.
Joe Barta
Swingman wrote:
> "Robatoy" wrote in message
>
>
>>I used SWMBO as a calibration standard.
>>
>>Got it right 2 for 2.
>>
>>Never did get around to the test again.
>
>
> LOL ... mine made the mistake of coming up behind me to look over my
> shoulder, with the expected results.
>
So how did it feel to be slapped up side the head? :)
Dave
16 out of 20!
--
Stoutman
http://www.garagewoodworks.com/index.htm
(Featuring a NEW look)
"John B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
> regards
> John
18 out of 20 #2 and # 9 fooled me.
Thanks for the test.
Jim
"John B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
> regards
> John
In article <[email protected]>,
John B <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
> regards
> John
I used SWMBO as a calibration standard.
Got it right 2 for 2.
Never did get around to the test again.
Yes sir, it would. please send me asap the specifics for your braille
monitor.
"Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dear Sir:
>
> Would it be possible for you to arrange for me to take this test in
> Braille?
>
On 21 Feb 2006 07:12:07 -0800, with neither quill nor qualm, "Tom
Watson" <[email protected]> quickly quoth:
>Dear Sir:
>
>Would it be possible for you to arrange for me to take this test in
>Braille?
I taught Braille Anatomy in high school but only scored 11 out of 20
on that test. Horrible!
Monsieur Tawm, you come back for the strangest threads... ;)
--
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly
is to fill the world with fools.
--Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
In article <[email protected]>, John B <[email protected]> wrote:
>Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
>http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
17 out of 20 correct....
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:12:54 GMT, John B
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
>http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
18 of 20.
But then I spend a portion of every day at http://www.voyeurweb.com
And I'm not ashamed to admit it.
--
LRod
Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite
Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999
http://www.woodbutcher.net
Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997
email addy de-spam-ified due to 1,000 spams per month.
If you can't figure out how to use it, I probably wouldn't
care to correspond with you anyway.
"Enoch Root" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> Is it okay to take a "practical" before the exam?
You must be one of those people that prefers the hands on approach, eh?
I think I'll stick to wood working. 14 out of 20 right.
"John B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Not much to do with wood, but good to sort out the so called experts ;)
>
> http://www.c4wkg0blin.com/breasttest.html
>
> regards
> John