jJ

16/08/2004 4:27 AM

Board layout software

Hi

I am looking for a reasonably priced software package to generate an
optimised board layout from a cutting list. This is purely for hobby
use so it does not have to have masses of other features.

I do a lot of work using 12440 X 1220 mm (8' X 4') board and I would
mainly like to reduce wastage. I occasionally have it cut for me and
as my local store charges per cut it would be nice (but not essential)
to have something that optimises for the least number of cuts as an
option.

I have had a browse around the web and found several different
packages: Cutlist, Sheetlayout, Optimik, etc. I wonder if anyone has
used these and what are their opinions of them?

Thanks

James


This topic has 12 replies

MR

"Mark Rance"

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

23/08/2004 1:32 AM

I have toyed with the idea of building an application that did the layout of
a cutlist on boards in the pattern that minimizes waste. Perhaps now is the
time.

-Mark

"Shrikanth S" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hello James,
> You may like to have a look at our PLUS 2D
> software. The demo is available on our website,
> and may be sufficient for your estimation needs.
> s.shrikanth
> Nirvana Technologies.
> www.nirvanatec.com

mM

[email protected] (Mike Myers)

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

16/08/2004 11:57 AM

I have purchased both Cutlist and Sheetlayout and I have found Cutlist easier
to use and setup.

Mike

Lr

"Leon"

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

23/08/2004 1:09 PM

Since there are a bunch of these programs out there, be a bit different.
Design one that will handle odd shapes such as triangles or circles, shapes
that do not have all square corners. Then you would have something
different and would be more likely to compete.


LH

"Lowell Holmes"

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

16/08/2004 7:18 AM

12440X1220 mm has no meaning to me. I do use a lot of 4'X8' plywood though.
:-)

Just kidding. . .
I use AutoCad for layout. There are a number of programs available that cost
less though. The current issue of Fine Woodworking has an article on
drawing software for less than $100. Design Cad was the first cad software I
used. I was very solid 20 years ago, and I suspect it still is.

"James" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hi
>
> I am looking for a reasonably priced software package to generate an
> optimised board layout from a cutting list. This is purely for hobby
> use so it does not have to have masses of other features.
>
> I do a lot of work using 12440 X 1220 mm (8' X 4') board and I would
> mainly like to reduce wastage. I occasionally have it cut for me and
> as my local store charges per cut it would be nice (but not essential)
> to have something that optimises for the least number of cuts as an
> option.
>
> I have had a browse around the web and found several different
> packages: Cutlist, Sheetlayout, Optimik, etc. I wonder if anyone has
> used these and what are their opinions of them?
>
> Thanks
>
> James

JJ

JGS

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

17/08/2004 7:22 AM

Ditto

"Norman D. Crow" wrote:

> I'll add my vote for Cutlist. Used the free version, then bought the next
> step up only because the free version will only handle 5 parts(IIRC). Been
> very satisfied.
>
> --
> Nahmie
> The law of intelligent tinkering: save all the parts.
>
> "Mike Myers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > I have purchased both Cutlist and Sheetlayout and I have found Cutlist
> easier
> > to use and setup.
> >
> > Mike

Lr

"Leon"

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

16/08/2004 1:08 PM


"Lowell Holmes" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> 12440X1220 mm has no meaning to me. I do use a lot of 4'X8' plywood
though.
> :-)
>
> Just kidding. . .
> I use AutoCad for layout. There are a number of programs available that
cost
> less though. The current issue of Fine Woodworking has an article on
> drawing software for less than $100. Design Cad was the first cad software
I
> used. I was very solid 20 years ago, and I suspect it still is.

I use AutoCAD also but IIRC it does no do what the original poster is
looking for. He is looking for an optimization program. These programs
will automatically draw an illustration of each piece of stock that you
have on hand and draw on these pieces the pieces that are needed for a
project with the least amount of waste. The big difference between these
programs and most CAD programs is that you in put the size of your on hand
stock, the quantity and sizes of the pieces you need and the program draws
this out for you. So far these programs only work with square or
rectangular stock and items to be cut out. I use both Cultist Plus and
AutoCAD.

iS

[email protected] (Shrikanth S)

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

23/08/2004 12:21 AM

Hello James,
You may like to have a look at our PLUS 2D
software. The demo is available on our website,
and may be sufficient for your estimation needs.
s.shrikanth
Nirvana Technologies.
www.nirvanatec.com

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

16/08/2004 8:18 AM


"James" wrote in message

>
> I do a lot of work using 12440 X 1220 mm (8' X 4') board and I would
> mainly like to reduce wastage. I occasionally have it cut for me and
> as my local store charges per cut it would be nice (but not essential)
> to have something that optimises for the least number of cuts as an
> option.
>
> I have had a browse around the web and found several different
> packages: Cutlist, Sheetlayout, Optimik, etc. I wonder if anyone has
> used these and what are their opinions of them?

Been using Cutlist Plus for a number of years. Cuts, layout, inventory,
cost, etc can be custom configured for the way you work. The author is quick
with updates, and support is forthcoming when required, which has been rare
and mostly to do with my losing the authorization/update codes due to lost
e-mail.

Highly recommended.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 7/10/04

Br

"Bob"

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

16/08/2004 9:27 AM

check this link http://www.woodbin.com/
"James" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hi
>
> I am looking for a reasonably priced software package to generate an
> optimised board layout from a cutting list. This is purely for hobby
> use so it does not have to have masses of other features.
>
> I do a lot of work using 12440 X 1220 mm (8' X 4') board and I would
> mainly like to reduce wastage. I occasionally have it cut for me and
> as my local store charges per cut it would be nice (but not essential)
> to have something that optimises for the least number of cuts as an
> option.
>
> I have had a browse around the web and found several different
> packages: Cutlist, Sheetlayout, Optimik, etc. I wonder if anyone has
> used these and what are their opinions of them?
>
> Thanks
>
> James

ND

"Norman D. Crow"

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

16/08/2004 10:19 AM

I'll add my vote for Cutlist. Used the free version, then bought the next
step up only because the free version will only handle 5 parts(IIRC). Been
very satisfied.

--
Nahmie
The law of intelligent tinkering: save all the parts.



"Mike Myers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I have purchased both Cutlist and Sheetlayout and I have found Cutlist
easier
> to use and setup.
>
> Mike

JJ

"James"

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

16/08/2004 8:23 PM

Thanks to all who responded.

That piece of 12440 X 1220 sure would have been a large board.

I think I will give cutlist a try and see how it goes. I like the idea of
being able to keep the inventory, and it seems to do just about everything I
want.

Cheers

James

"Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> check this link http://www.woodbin.com/
> "James" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Hi
> >
> > I am looking for a reasonably priced software package to generate an
> > optimised board layout from a cutting list. This is purely for hobby
> > use so it does not have to have masses of other features.
> >
> > I do a lot of work using 12440 X 1220 mm (8' X 4') board and I would
> > mainly like to reduce wastage. I occasionally have it cut for me and
> > as my local store charges per cut it would be nice (but not essential)
> > to have something that optimises for the least number of cuts as an
> > option.
> >
> > I have had a browse around the web and found several different
> > packages: Cutlist, Sheetlayout, Optimik, etc. I wonder if anyone has
> > used these and what are their opinions of them?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > James
>
>

BR

Bill Rogers

in reply to [email protected] (James) on 16/08/2004 4:27 AM

16/08/2004 9:05 AM

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:18:02 -0500, "Lowell Holmes" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>I use AutoCad for layout. There are a number of programs available that cost
>less though. The current issue of Fine Woodworking has an article on
>drawing software for less than $100. Design Cad was the first cad software I
>used. I was very solid 20 years ago, and I suspect it still is.

The CAD program might be the way to go, and there are free ones out
there. Other specific software will do the work for a price, but the
CAD can be used for other purposes as well, making the price better in
the long run ...especially if free to begin with. Just draw
rectangles for boards, and rectangles (?) for cutouts to dimension,
then drag them around until it looks good. That takes a minute or so
longer than having software do it, but just fine if you are not a high
production business and just a hobbyist. Get the CAD program to add
'dimensions' and you can do a printout on an 8 1/2 by 11 [inches that
is] sheet to use for cutting directions.

I had a whole bunch of slats to cut from cherry planks for picture
frames, and used this approach very effectively; very little excess
material loss.

Bill.


You’ve reached the end of replies