OT - Solely in the interest of humanity...

Swingman wrote:
> ... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come to the
> decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to do ALL
> ya'll a BIG favor:
>
> Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal
> financial data suggests that _my_ investment in crude oil futures will
> suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices, thereby
> allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec discussions of
> electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced necessity on the
> part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in spam, to
> the benefit of all.
>
> AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, and stay
> tuned.
>
> And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrifice for
> _your_ salvation.
>
> ... you're welcome!
>

You must have gone to the same business school I did.

Thanks for the sacrifice!

--
Bill B.

http://home.comcast.net/~bberg100

"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid
in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly
proclaiming, 'WOW! What A RIDE!!" ... Unknown

On Fri, 9 May 2008 17:46:59 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 9, 3:40 pm, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:29:37 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come to the
>> >decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to do ALL
>> >ya'll a BIG favor:
>>
>> >Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal
>> >financial data suggests that _my_  investment in crude oil futures will
>> >suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices, thereby
>> >allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec discussions of
>> >electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced necessity on the
>> >part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in spam, to
>> >the benefit of all.
>>
>> >AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, and stay
>> >tuned.
>>
>> >And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrifice for
>> >_your_ salvation.
>>
>> >... you're welcome!
>>
>> Thanks but I feel left out.
>>
>> Being from Pennsyltucky, my idea of an investment is the money spent
>> on lottery tickets.
>>
>> My Grandfather said there was a word for people who think like that -
>> Democrats.
>>
>> Tom Watson
>> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnetwww.home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
>
>I think the two-party system is divisive.

Da tavarisch.





Tom Watson
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet
www.home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1

On May 9, 9:06=A0pm, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 17:46:59 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On May 9, 3:40=A0pm, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:29:37 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come to t=
he
> >> >decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to do A=
LL
> >> >ya'll a BIG favor:
>
> >> >Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal=

> >> >financial data suggests that _my_ =A0investment in crude oil futures w=
ill
> >> >suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices, th=
ereby
> >> >allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec discussions=
of
> >> >electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced necessity o=
n the
> >> >part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in spa=
m, to
> >> >the benefit of all.
>
> >> >AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, and =
stay
> >> >tuned.
>
> >> >And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrifice=
for
> >> >_your_ salvation.
>
> >> >... you're welcome!
>
> >> Thanks but I feel left out.
>
> >> Being from Pennsyltucky, my idea of an investment is the money spent
> >> on lottery tickets.
>
> >> My Grandfather said there was a word for people who think like that -
> >> Democrats.
>
> >> Tom Watson
> >> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnetwww.home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
>
> >I think the two-party system is divisive.
>
> Da tavarisch.

(In my best Scooby Doo voice): Huh??

Swingman wrote:

> ... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come to the
> decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to do ALL
> ya'll a BIG favor:
>
> Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal
> financial data suggests that _my_ investment in crude oil futures will
> suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices,
> thereby allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec
> discussions of electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced
> necessity on the part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to
> engage in spam, to the benefit of all.
>
> AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, and stay
> tuned.
>
> And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrifice for
> _your_ salvation.
>
> ... you're welcome!
>

Thank-you very much for your contribution to our financial well being! I
have a similar run with stocks; I've considered writing the CFO's of
corporations and telling them that for a small fee, I will *not* buy any of
their stock and enclosing a copy of my portfolio to back up my offer.


--
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough

"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal
> financial data suggests that _my_ investment in crude oil futures will
> suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices,
> thereby
> allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec discussions of
> electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced necessity on
> the
> part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in spam,
> to
> the benefit of all.


Thank you. I also have invested in oil products. Just today I bought
another $53 of the commodity and I'm storing it in a tank in my wife's car.

On May 12, 6:39=A0pm, [email protected] (Scott Lurndal) wrote:
> Robatoy <[email protected]> writes:
> >On May 9, 9:06=3DA0pm, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 9 May 2008 17:46:59 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy
>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >On May 9, 3:40=3DA0pm, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:29:37 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrot=
e:
> >> >> >... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come t=
o t=3D
> >he
> >> >> >decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to d=
o A=3D
> >LL
> >> >> >ya'll a BIG favor:
>
> >> >> >Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, perso=
nal=3D
>
> >> >> >financial data suggests that _my_ =3DA0investment in crude oil futu=
res w=3D
> >ill
> >> >> >suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices,=
th=3D
> >ereby
> >> >> >allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec discussi=
ons=3D
> > of
> >> >> >electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced necessit=
y o=3D
> >n the
> >> >> >part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in =
spa=3D
> >m, to
> >> >> >the benefit of all.
>
> >> >> >AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, a=
nd =3D
> >stay
> >> >> >tuned.
>
> >> >> >And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrif=
ice=3D
> > for
> >> >> >_your_ salvation.
>
> >> >> >... you're welcome!
>
> >> >> Thanks but I feel left out.
>
> >> >> Being from Pennsyltucky, my idea of an investment is the money spent=

> >> >> on lottery tickets.
>
> >> >> My Grandfather said there was a word for people who think like that =
-
> >> >> Democrats.
>
> >> >> Tom Watson
> >> >> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnetwww.home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
>
> >> >I think the two-party system is divisive.
>
> >> Da tavarisch.
>
> >(In my best Scooby Doo voice): Huh??
>
> Literal Translation: =A0"Yes, Comrade".
>
> Implication: =A0one-party is the only alternative.
>
> Acually: three parties are a lot more fun.

Three parties are also divisive. Smaller piece of the pie, but still
divisive.

Or 35 parties and the 5 biggest can't form a coalition gov't.

"Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:a2d3fc2c-02de-401f-92d9-cb3f19903854@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

Three parties are also divisive. Smaller piece of the pie, but still
divisive.

Or 35 parties and the 5 biggest can't form a coalition gov't.



How about NO Friggin Parties, Clubs, or Associations.

On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:29:37 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:

>... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come to the
>decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to do ALL
>ya'll a BIG favor:
>
>Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal
>financial data suggests that _my_ investment in crude oil futures will
>suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices, thereby
>allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec discussions of
>electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced necessity on the
>part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in spam, to
>the benefit of all.
>
>AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, and stay
>tuned.
>
>And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrifice for
>_your_ salvation.
>
>... you're welcome!


Thank you so much. I finally have an investment strategy. I can
short oil, go long on carbon credits and electrical components, and
start looking for opportunities in the Chinese stock market.

Your sacrifice is appreciated.

Frank

"Edwin Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered,
>> personal financial data suggests that _my_ investment in crude oil
>> futures will suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in
>> oil prices, thereby
>> allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec
>> discussions of electrical and global warming issues, along with a
>> reduced necessity on the
>> part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in
>> spam, to
>> the benefit of all.
>
>
> Thank you. I also have invested in oil products. Just today I bought
> another $53 of the commodity and I'm storing it in a tank in my wife's
> car.
>
>
>

Tank was half full?

On May 9, 3:40=A0pm, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:29:37 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come to the
> >decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to do ALL
> >ya'll a BIG favor:
>
> >Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal
> >financial data suggests that _my_ =A0investment in crude oil futures will=

> >suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices, there=
by
> >allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec discussions of=

> >electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced necessity on t=
he
> >part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in spam, =
to
> >the benefit of all.
>
> >AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, and sta=
y
> >tuned.
>
> >And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrifice fo=
r
> >_your_ salvation.
>
> >... you're welcome!
>
> Thanks but I feel left out.
>
> Being from Pennsyltucky, my idea of an investment is the money spent
> on lottery tickets.
>
> My Grandfather said there was a word for people who think like that -
> Democrats.
>
> Tom Watson
> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnetwww.home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1

I think the two-party system is divisive.

On May 8, 10:10 pm, Mark & Juanita <[email protected]> wrote:
> Swingman wrote:
> > ... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come to the
> > decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to do ALL
> > ya'll a BIG favor:
>
> > Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal
> > financial data suggests that _my_ investment in crude oil futures will
> > suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices,
> > thereby allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec
> > discussions of electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced
> > necessity on the part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to
> > engage in spam, to the benefit of all.
>
> > AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, and stay
> > tuned.
>
> > And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrifice for
> > _your_ salvation.
>
> > ... you're welcome!
>
> Thank-you very much for your contribution to our financial well being! I
> have a similar run with stocks; I've considered writing the CFO's of
> corporations and telling them that for a small fee, I will *not* buy any of
> their stock and enclosing a copy of my portfolio to back up my offer.
>

I'd like to transfer all of my investments to the "Sell Short Fund",
but so far haven't found one.

--

FF

On May 13, 11:08 am, "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:a2d3fc2c-02de-401f-92d9-cb3f19903854@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> Three parties are also divisive. Smaller piece of the pie, but still
> divisive.
>
> Or 35 parties and the 5 biggest can't form a coalition gov't.
>
> How about NO Friggin Parties, Clubs, or Associations.

I think that would be much better. Problem is, I also think
people have a right to association.

--

FF

Robatoy <[email protected]> writes:
>On May 9, 9:06=A0pm, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 May 2008 17:46:59 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy
>>
>>
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >On May 9, 3:40=A0pm, Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:29:37 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come to t=
>he
>> >> >decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to do A=
>LL
>> >> >ya'll a BIG favor:
>>
>> >> >Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal=
>
>> >> >financial data suggests that _my_ =A0investment in crude oil futures w=
>ill
>> >> >suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices, th=
>ereby
>> >> >allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec discussions=
> of
>> >> >electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced necessity o=
>n the
>> >> >part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in spa=
>m, to
>> >> >the benefit of all.
>>
>> >> >AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, and =
>stay
>> >> >tuned.
>>
>> >> >And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrifice=
> for
>> >> >_your_ salvation.
>>
>> >> >... you're welcome!
>>
>> >> Thanks but I feel left out.
>>
>> >> Being from Pennsyltucky, my idea of an investment is the money spent
>> >> on lottery tickets.
>>
>> >> My Grandfather said there was a word for people who think like that -
>> >> Democrats.
>>
>> >> Tom Watson
>> >> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnetwww.home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1
>>
>> >I think the two-party system is divisive.
>>
>> Da tavarisch.
>
>(In my best Scooby Doo voice): Huh??

Literal Translation: "Yes, Comrade".

Implication: one-party is the only alternative.

Acually: three parties are a lot more fun.

"Tom Watson" wrote

> Thanks but I feel left out.
>
> Being from Pennsyltucky, my idea of an investment is the money spent
> on lottery tickets.

Don't tell me that's NOT the case!?

> My Grandfather said there was a word for people who think like that -
> Democrats.

Damn, that makes me a bonafide political schizophrenic.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 3/27/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:29:37 -0500, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:

>... and, of course, all my wooddorking buds hereabouts, I've come to the
>decision (gallantly and altruistically if I may say so myself) to do ALL
>ya'll a BIG favor:
>
>Scientific analysis of some 40 + years of carefully gathered, personal
>financial data suggests that _my_ investment in crude oil futures will
>suffice to trigger an immediate and precipitous fall in oil prices, thereby
>allowing a return to the more normal (and comforting) wRec discussions of
>electrical and global warming issues, along with a reduced necessity on the
>part of a proportionately more robust Chinese economy to engage in spam, to
>the benefit of all.
>
>AAMOF, I just called my broker, so wish me/us luck on all counts, and stay
>tuned.
>
>And above all remember that those who buy high and sell low, sacrifice for
>_your_ salvation.
>
>... you're welcome!


Thanks but I feel left out.

Being from Pennsyltucky, my idea of an investment is the money spent
on lottery tickets.

My Grandfather said there was a word for people who think like that -
Democrats.


Tom Watson
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet
www.home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1

"Fred the Red Shirt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:f0281697-80d4-480b-84b5-64295710ffa1@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On May 13, 11:08 am, "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> news:a2d3fc2c-02de-401f-92d9-cb3f19903854@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Three parties are also divisive. Smaller piece of the pie, but still
>> divisive.
>>
>> Or 35 parties and the 5 biggest can't form a coalition gov't.
>>
>> How about NO Friggin Parties, Clubs, or Associations.
>
> I think that would be much better. Problem is, I also think
> people have a right to association.


As do I . How about the group forms after the election and dissolves when
the president leaves office. And or there is the peoples party that is
never elected but always remains of equal power to the law makers. The
government hot shots can propose all the laws and changes that they want but
every thing has to be voted on by the people.

"Frank Boettcher" wrote in message

> Thank you so much. I finally have an investment strategy. I can
> short oil, go long on carbon credits and electrical components, and
> start looking for opportunities in the Chinese stock market.

ROFL ...

> Your sacrifice is appreciated.

Glad to oblige you!

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 3/27/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Leon wrote:
> "Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:a2d3fc2c-02de-401f-92d9-cb3f19903854@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> Three parties are also divisive. Smaller piece of the pie, but still
> divisive.
>
> Or 35 parties and the 5 biggest can't form a coalition gov't.
>
>
>
> How about NO Friggin Parties, Clubs, or Associations.

Anarchy RULES!!!!