Yeah I can see you post so much here, that I might be a problem.... BUT GEE
all you do is piss, whine and moan.... and gee no posts huh?
Now what's up with that?
Better Call your Mommy!
"Rick Soulsby" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Come on people, this is a woodworking group. NOT a OT (off Topic) group.
> Rsouls
>
PLONK
--
Stoutman
http://home.triad.rr.com/brianmelissa/woodworking_frames.htm
(Featuring a NEW look)
"Rick Soulsby" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Come on people, this is a woodworking group. NOT a OT (off Topic) group.
> Rsouls
>
"Rick Soulsby" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Come on people, this is a woodworking group. NOT a OT (off Topic) group.
> Rsouls
>
Hold on everybody! Rick has had enough. Lets wrap it up and get back on
topic.
Sorry about that Rick sometimes things get out of hand, but I'm sure we'll
be fine now. If you have any other usenet problems, just let me know and
I'll take of it for you...
Why do you go to the trouble of looking up a person's posting history?
Is it relevant to the topic whether he is a lurker or a frequent poster?
Are you implying that those who do not post frequently should not feel
they have a right to complain about the FREQUENT OT postings to this
group? I'm just wondering why some people feel the need to attack others
simply voicing their views.
Mark & Juanita wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:18:01 -0500, "Rick Soulsby" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Come on people, this is a woodworking group. NOT a OT (off Topic) group.
>>Rsouls
>>
>
>
> ... and aside from one posting on Nov 12, 2002 asking what table saw to
> buy, your contributions to woodworking discussion have been...?
>
> BTW, exactly *which* group is a[n] OT (off Topic) group? By it's very
> nature, wouldn't posting off-topic then really be on-topic making the
> existance of such a group logically inconsistent and incapble of existing?
>
> Frankly, for the past month or so, the OT volume has pretty much been
> fairly low as such things go on this group.
>
>
>
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
>
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
Joseph Connors
The New Golden Rule:
Those with the gold, make the rules!
Joseph Connors wrote:
> Why do you go to the trouble of looking up a person's posting
> history?
I do it myself from time to time. Sometimes it offers insights on the
poster and sometimes you find things out about them that you never
knew. Call it curious and nothing better to do at the time ;-)
> Is it relevant to the topic whether he is a lurker or a
> frequent poster? Are you implying that those who do not post
> frequently should not feel they have a right to complain about the
> FREQUENT OT postings to this group?
Anyone can complain about anything. Complain as you wish.
> I'm just wondering why some
> people feel the need to attack others simply voicing their views.
And I'm just wondering why some people insist on using the word
"attack". Sort of comical actually. "He attacked me! He attacked me!"
To which I say, get up you nancy-boy and quit whining ;-)
Anyhow, chill out, get a grip, post if you want, complain if you
want... but just get out of the victim mode. In any usenet group, in
addition to finding lots of great information, you'll also find a
healthy amount of off-topic ranting and sniping. Ain't it great?
Joe Barta
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:18:01 -0500, "Rick Soulsby" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Come on people, this is a woodworking group. NOT a OT (off Topic) group.
>Rsouls
>
... and aside from one posting on Nov 12, 2002 asking what table saw to
buy, your contributions to woodworking discussion have been...?
BTW, exactly *which* group is a[n] OT (off Topic) group? By it's very
nature, wouldn't posting off-topic then really be on-topic making the
existance of such a group logically inconsistent and incapble of existing?
Frankly, for the past month or so, the OT volume has pretty much been
fairly low as such things go on this group.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
In article <[email protected]>, "Rick Soulsby" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Come on people, this is a woodworking group. NOT a OT (off Topic) group.
This has been discussed to death already. Learn to use filters and killfiles,
or learn to ignore it.
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.