s

"."

11/09/2008 8:37 AM

OT: 9/11 Anniversary: Watch 9/11 Mysteries - How the World Trade Centre was demolished by the Neocons for an excuse to go back into Iraq

9/11 Mysteries
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871

http://www.911weknow.com

See for yourself what really happened in the 3 demolished buildings in
the weeks before 9/11. Since 9-11 the American public has shown a
"remarkable indifference to being deceived" (George Soros). But this
is changing. As Hugo Chavez put it: "The world is waking up. It's
waking up all over. And people are standing up." Millions around the
world are realizing that they are being lied to - not in a small, lazy
way, but in a big way. It's time to ask hard questions, many of which
911 Mysteries helps to answer. 90 minutes of evidence and analysis,
filled with eyewitness testimonials. Point-by-point review of the
official story set alongside clear science. The question is not one of
politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple
physics. Does steel melt in open air fires? What caused the core to
vanish in seconds? No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and
the questions.

A story of people: Willie Rodriguez's strange recollection of noises
on the 34th floor. Who was up there, bumping around? Scott Forbes'
similar story, weeks before the towers fell. Here's how shaped charges
slice through steel beams to control the way they fall.

For greater clarity, download the movie over bittorrent - or buy a DVD
online at www.911weknow.com.


This topic has 9 replies

tt

in reply to "." on 11/09/2008 8:37 AM

13/09/2008 6:13 AM

On Sep 13, 12:33=A0am, "Lord Gow333, Conservative Fullback!"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> "Randy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:31:27 -0700 (PDT), [email protected] wrote:
>
> >>> official story set alongside clear science. The question is not one o=
f
> >>> politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple
> >>> physics. Does steel melt in open air fires? What caused the core to
> >>> vanish in seconds? No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and
> >>> the questions.
>
> > I don't think anyone on a metalworking site will buy the bullshit. =A0w=
e
> > all know that steel will not MELT in a simple fire. =A0It will however
> > lose a large part of it's strength. =A0I simple property of steel that
> > was known for years to blacksmiths.
>
> This is what happens when schools drop shop classes in favor of "Explorin=
g
> Your Inner Self"...
>
> LG (caught his share of sparks in school)
> --
> Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently. - Henry For=
d


The foolish steel melting argument is a good example of the total
fallacy behind these conspiracy arguments. That nonsense has been
spouted freely by the conspiracy theorists and their Hollywood
celebrity friends. It has been easily dismissed by anyone familiar
with the material properties of steel. Steel doesn't have to melt
to lose it's ability to support a load. Anyone watching a blacksmith
on TV bang out a piece of metal or seeing other common everyday
materials like plastic become softer as they are heated should know
this. The steel used in the WTC loses half of it's strength around
1100 degrees and it's ability to support anything significant is gone
at 1700. Those temps are within the range of temps reached in the
fires.

Having this glaring total falsehood so easily demolished would make
any reasonable person question the motives and what the conspiracy
crowd is really all about. But then people who choose to believe
this nonsense aren't reasonable.

s

in reply to "." on 11/09/2008 8:37 AM

11/09/2008 10:31 AM

On Sep 11, 11:37 am, "." <[email protected]> wrote:
> 9/11 Mysterieshttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871
>
> http://www.911weknow.com
>
> See for yourself what really happened in the 3 demolished buildings in
> the weeks before 9/11. Since 9-11 the American public has shown a
> "remarkable indifference to being deceived" (George Soros). But this
> is changing. As Hugo Chavez put it: "The world is waking up. It's
> waking up all over. And people are standing up." Millions around the
> world are realizing that they are being lied to - not in a small, lazy
> way, but in a big way. It's time to ask hard questions, many of which
> 911 Mysteries helps to answer. 90 minutes of evidence and analysis,
> filled with eyewitness testimonials. Point-by-point review of the
> official story set alongside clear science. The question is not one of
> politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple
> physics. Does steel melt in open air fires? What caused the core to
> vanish in seconds? No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and
> the questions.
>
> A story of people: Willie Rodriguez's strange recollection of noises
> on the 34th floor. Who was up there, bumping around? Scott Forbes'
> similar story, weeks before the towers fell. Here's how shaped charges
> slice through steel beams to control the way they fall.
>
> For greater clarity, download the movie over bittorrent - or buy a DVD
> online atwww.911weknow.com.


How unintelligent do you need to be to buy into this shit?

The sad thing is idiots latch onto this stuff, and then miss the ways
in which we are indeed getting fucked and led by the nose.

Asshole- you're actually *helping* people stay ignorant.

Quoting chavez- that just speaks for itself.

Dave

LG

"Lord Gow333, Conservative Fullback!"

in reply to "." on 11/09/2008 8:37 AM

11/09/2008 11:38 PM


"." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:13558729-403f-415a-929d-6c0a282ae33d@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> 9/11 Mysteries
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871
>
> http://www.911weknow.com
>
> See for yourself what really happened in the 3 demolished buildings in
> the weeks before 9/11.

You will have better luck trying to get me to watch Hillary Clinton shaving
her legs...

LG
--
The only way to get Democrats to focus on terrorists would be to convince
them that the terrorists are interfering with a woman's right to choose or
that commercial jetliners exploding in midair are a threat to America's
wetlands. - Ann Coulter

LS

"Leonard Shapiro"

in reply to "." on 11/09/2008 8:37 AM

12/09/2008 12:37 AM

you must be a bush supporter to be that stupid! or just maybe you are bush.

aA

[email protected] (Al Dykes)

in reply to "." on 11/09/2008 8:37 AM

13/09/2008 8:32 AM

In article <13558729-403f-415a-929d-6c0a282ae33d@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
. <[email protected]> wrote:
>9/11 Mysteries
>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871
>
>http://www.911weknow.com
>
>See for yourself what really happened in the 3 demolished buildings in
>the weeks before 9/11. Since 9-11 the American public has shown a
>"remarkable indifference to being deceived" (George Soros). But this



According to the film maker that shot some of the video used in 9/11
Mysteries, the audio on his film has been faked to include the sounds
of explosions. If explosions heard 2 miles away were real, about a
million people in Manhattan and Brooklyn would have also heard them
and it would have been caught on the countless video cameras in use
when the towers fell. It wasn't.


------------------------------------

Rick Siegel, the person that shot video of the WTC collapse
from Hoboken, 2 miles away, shows his original video and
compares it to the the versions used in two "Truth Movement"
conspiracy videos; "9/11 Eyewitness" by James Brewster and
"9/11 Mysteries" by Sophia Shafquat.

Siegel shows that the "explosions" heard on 9/11 Mysteries and
9/11 Eyewitness are, in fact, not on his the original tape.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jir7yWTroN8

Brewster & Shafquat claim the sounds are evidence of man-made
explosives at WTC. Someone manipulated the sound track to make
those noises.

Of the dozens of video tapes we have from WTC on 9/11, there are
no recordings that show explosions that sound like man-made
blasts and are loud enough and timed to be consistent with any
building collapse. The 1993 bombing, equal to 1,000 bounds of TNT
and loud enough to be heard throughout the WTC complex and for
blocks around, was not large enough to do any structural damage to
the WTC tower it was under.

WTC on 9/11 was probably the most-witnessed disaster in history.
For more information about all the imagery we have for it read the
book, "Watching The world change; The Stories behind the images
of 9/11" by David Friend

For more information about fact-based 9/11, go to
http://911mysteriesguide.com/
and
911myths.com


--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

Rr

Randy

in reply to "." on 11/09/2008 8:37 AM

12/09/2008 9:04 AM

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:31:27 -0700 (PDT), [email protected] wrote:

>> official story set alongside clear science. The question is not one of
>> politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple
>> physics. Does steel melt in open air fires? What caused the core to
>> vanish in seconds? No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and
>> the questions.

I don't think anyone on a metalworking site will buy the bullshit. we
all know that steel will not MELT in a simple fire. It will however
lose a large part of it's strength. I simple property of steel that
was known for years to blacksmiths.

>
>How unintelligent do you need to be to buy into this shit?
>
>The sad thing is idiots latch onto this stuff, and then miss the ways
>in which we are indeed getting fucked and led by the nose.
>
>Asshole- you're actually *helping* people stay ignorant.
>
>Quoting chavez- that just speaks for itself.
>
>Dave
Thank You,
Randy

Remove 333 from email address to reply.

PH

"Paul Howard"

in reply to "." on 11/09/2008 8:37 AM

11/09/2008 6:46 PM

I wonder why anybody here responses to this sort of garbage?

--

Paul Howard (Alias Drak Bibliophile), AIM id DrakeBookLover
*
Sometimes The Dragon Wins! [Polite Dragon Smile]
*

"Jim Chandler" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:tRgyk.851$Dj1.772@trnddc02...
> [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sep 11, 11:37 am, "." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>9/11
>>>Mysterieshttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871
>>>
>>>http://www.911weknow.com
>>>
>>>See for yourself what really happened in the 3 demolished buildings in
>>>the weeks before 9/11. Since 9-11 the American public has shown a
>>>"remarkable indifference to being deceived" (George Soros). But this
>>>is changing. As Hugo Chavez put it: "The world is waking up. It's
>>>waking up all over. And people are standing up." Millions around the
>>>world are realizing that they are being lied to - not in a small, lazy
>>>way, but in a big way. It's time to ask hard questions, many of which
>>>911 Mysteries helps to answer. 90 minutes of evidence and analysis,
>>>filled with eyewitness testimonials. Point-by-point review of the
>>>official story set alongside clear science. The question is not one of
>>>politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple
>>>physics. Does steel melt in open air fires? What caused the core to
>>>vanish in seconds? No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and
>>>the questions.
>>>
>>>A story of people: Willie Rodriguez's strange recollection of noises
>>>on the 34th floor. Who was up there, bumping around? Scott Forbes'
>>>similar story, weeks before the towers fell. Here's how shaped charges
>>>slice through steel beams to control the way they fall.
>>>
>>>For greater clarity, download the movie over bittorrent - or buy a DVD
>>>online atwww.911weknow.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> How unintelligent do you need to be to buy into this shit?
>>
>> The sad thing is idiots latch onto this stuff, and then miss the ways
>> in which we are indeed getting fucked and led by the nose.
>>
>> Asshole- you're actually *helping* people stay ignorant.
>>
>> Quoting chavez- that just speaks for itself.
>>
>> Dave
>
>
> Thank you, Dave. You beat me to it.
>
> Jim

JC

Jim Chandler

in reply to "." on 11/09/2008 8:37 AM

11/09/2008 10:21 PM

[email protected] wrote:
> On Sep 11, 11:37 am, "." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>9/11 Mysterieshttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871
>>
>>http://www.911weknow.com
>>
>>See for yourself what really happened in the 3 demolished buildings in
>>the weeks before 9/11. Since 9-11 the American public has shown a
>>"remarkable indifference to being deceived" (George Soros). But this
>>is changing. As Hugo Chavez put it: "The world is waking up. It's
>>waking up all over. And people are standing up." Millions around the
>>world are realizing that they are being lied to - not in a small, lazy
>>way, but in a big way. It's time to ask hard questions, many of which
>>911 Mysteries helps to answer. 90 minutes of evidence and analysis,
>>filled with eyewitness testimonials. Point-by-point review of the
>>official story set alongside clear science. The question is not one of
>>politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple
>>physics. Does steel melt in open air fires? What caused the core to
>>vanish in seconds? No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and
>>the questions.
>>
>>A story of people: Willie Rodriguez's strange recollection of noises
>>on the 34th floor. Who was up there, bumping around? Scott Forbes'
>>similar story, weeks before the towers fell. Here's how shaped charges
>>slice through steel beams to control the way they fall.
>>
>>For greater clarity, download the movie over bittorrent - or buy a DVD
>>online atwww.911weknow.com.
>
>
>
> How unintelligent do you need to be to buy into this shit?
>
> The sad thing is idiots latch onto this stuff, and then miss the ways
> in which we are indeed getting fucked and led by the nose.
>
> Asshole- you're actually *helping* people stay ignorant.
>
> Quoting chavez- that just speaks for itself.
>
> Dave


Thank you, Dave. You beat me to it.

Jim

LG

"Lord Gow333, Conservative Fullback!"

in reply to "." on 11/09/2008 8:37 AM

13/09/2008 12:33 AM


"Randy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:31:27 -0700 (PDT), [email protected] wrote:
>
>>> official story set alongside clear science. The question is not one of
>>> politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple
>>> physics. Does steel melt in open air fires? What caused the core to
>>> vanish in seconds? No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and
>>> the questions.
>
> I don't think anyone on a metalworking site will buy the bullshit. we
> all know that steel will not MELT in a simple fire. It will however
> lose a large part of it's strength. I simple property of steel that
> was known for years to blacksmiths.

This is what happens when schools drop shop classes in favor of "Exploring
Your Inner Self"...

LG (caught his share of sparks in school)
--
Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently. - Henry Ford


You’ve reached the end of replies