On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:19:46 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:
>On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>
>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>
>>
>>
>
>A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>
>And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>option now, right London?
I'll agree with "ignorant" and "uneducated" but it's got nothing to
do with whether they are liberal, conservative, Libertatian, or
anarchist.
They are just plain STUPID, as is ANY lawfirm who would take it on as
a class action. INCREDIBLE!!!!
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:27:13 -0500, Markem <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:48:04 -0600, Just Wondering
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On 6/22/2017 10:27 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>> On 6/22/17 11:19 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some
>>>> one else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>> option now, right London?
>>>
>>> This article about it is great!
>>> <http://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/lawsuit-home-depot-selling-4x4s-that-arent-4-inches-by-4-inches-everyone-else-they-arent-supposed-to-be-you-moron/>
>>>
>>Next they'll be suing Harbor Freight for selling 8'x10' tarps that are
>>really more like 7'6"x9'6". Or suing Payless for selling size 8 shoes
>>that are not all the same size.
>
>Hey it worked for computer monitors, 14 inches they were not.
Now thet are "14 inch class" or "22 inch class" With TVs years back,
the same TV sold as a 27 inch in USA was a 26 inch in Canada.
On Sat, 24 Jun 2017 11:57:21 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:
>On 6/22/2017 9:35 PM, Keith Nuttle wrote:
>> On 6/22/2017 9:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:55:35 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/22/2017 12:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:19:46 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting
>>>>>> some one
>>>>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>>>> option now, right London?
>>>>> I'll agree with "ignorant" and "uneducated" but it's got nothing to
>>>>> do with whether they are liberal, conservative, Libertatian, or
>>>>> anarchist.
>>>>>
>>>> And that is entirely true. I was just picturing the Youtube reactions
>>>> of the young people, throwing temper tantrums, when Clinton lost the
>>>> presidential election.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Can you imagine the temper tantrums from the "right" if the election
>>> had been "stolen" from Trump?? Would have made the "liberal" hissyfit
>>> look like a love-in!!
>>
>> You mean like the riots that occurred when obama was elected? ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>I think the race riots happens well after Obama was elected, that was on
>him.
I think that's what the smiley was for. ;-)
^ Just
| in
| case
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:38:48 -0400, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>ilm a few months ago.
>> I picked up a can at Lowe's a few months ago and I like the stuff,
>> except for the fresh sprayed sme
That's why I only buy on-line what I can't buy locally. Can almost
always beat the Amazing Amazon prices next door.
On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 11:20:03 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
=20
> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one=
=20
> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>=20
Leon's comment worded differently:
"In a statement to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Yevgeniy (Eugene) Turin =
of McGuire Law claimed the suit is based on the fact that "reasonable consu=
mers" are unaware of the difference between nominal (pre-surfacing of the f=
our sides) and actual dimensions."
The key point in the above statement, and what the suit is based on, is "re=
asonable customers". It should be easy to prove those customers are defin=
itely "not reasonable", hence the suit should be easily dismissed.
One has to think unreasonably (be unreasonable), in order to dream-up an as=
inine case, as this.
For those customers, HD & Menards should mandate (counter suit!) that they =
can only buy rough cut lumber.... and be further charged with filing frivol=
ous law suits.
Sonny
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:57:17 -0400, Ed Pawlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 6/23/2017 10:38 AM, Jack wrote:
>> On 6/22/2017 4:13 PM, Leon wrote:
>
>> Thanks Leon, I'll have to get some of that.
>>
>> Speaking of Amazon, looking for the product, at Lowe's it was $9.99 and
>> at Amazon, $13.14, plus shipping, over 30% more, plus shipping. Damn,
>> Amazon is really out to lunch on so much stuff.
>
>
>You did not check completely. You can find it in the right column for
>$10.99 free shipping from Sim supply.
>
>https://smile.amazon.com/As11-Fluid-Film-11-75oz-Spray/dp/B00PWZ0XNM/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1498232998&sr=8-2&keywords=fluid+film+spray
>
>The $13.14 price is free shipping if you have Prime and want it in two
>days.
>
>Amazon is not always the lowest price but you also have to factor in the
>time and cost of a trip to Lowes. For me, it is about $7 if I go alone,
>about $37 if my wife goes and we stop for lunch.
>
>
I jump on my bike if I want toi be sure I don't bring too many extras
along home with me - - -
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:48:04 -0600, Just Wondering
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On 6/22/2017 10:27 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 6/22/17 11:19 AM, Leon wrote:
>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some
>>> one else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>
>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>> option now, right London?
>>
>> This article about it is great!
>> <http://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/lawsuit-home-depot-selling-4x4s-that-arent-4-inches-by-4-inches-everyone-else-they-arent-supposed-to-be-you-moron/>
>>
>Next they'll be suing Harbor Freight for selling 8'x10' tarps that are
>really more like 7'6"x9'6". Or suing Payless for selling size 8 shoes
>that are not all the same size.
Hey it worked for computer monitors, 14 inches they were not.
On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>
>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>
> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
either but I think we both agree on that.
>
>>
>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>> option now, right London?
>
> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
>
Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
> >On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> >> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
> >>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> >>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
> >>>>
> >>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
> >>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
> >>
> >> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
> >
> >I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
> >between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
> >either but I think we both agree on that.
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
> >>> option now, right London?
> >>
> >> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
> >> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
> >>
> >
> >Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
> >will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
> >
> >And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
> around the world.
> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> >says...
> >>
> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> >> >> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
> >> >>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> >> >>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
> >> >>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
> >> >>
> >> >> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
> >> >
> >> >I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
> >> >between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
> >> >either but I think we both agree on that.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
> >> >>> option now, right London?
> >> >>
> >> >> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
> >> >> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
> >> >will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
> >> >
> >> >And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
> >> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
> >> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
> >> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
> >> around the world.
> >> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
> >
> >Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
> Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
> without being detected.
How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> >says...
> >>
> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> >> >says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> >> >> >> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
> >> >> >>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> >> >> >>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
> >> >> >>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
> >> >> >between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
> >> >> >either but I think we both agree on that.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
> >> >> >>> option now, right London?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
> >> >> >> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
> >> >> >will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
> >> >> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
> >> >> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
> >> >> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
> >> >> around the world.
> >> >> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
> >> >
> >> >Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
> >> Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
> >> without being detected.
> >
> >How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
> >way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
> Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
> capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
> case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)
Why would one be sitting in the cab of a truck? And wandering around a
city with a sniper rifle gets noticed.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
>
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 22:10:01 -0400, "J. Clarke"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> >says...
> >>
> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> >> >says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> >> >> >says...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
> >> >> >> >>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
> >> >> >> >>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
> >> >> >> >between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
> >> >> >> >either but I think we both agree on that.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
> >> >> >> >>> option now, right London?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
> >> >> >> >> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
> >> >> >> >will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
> >> >> >> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
> >> >> >> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
> >> >> >> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
> >> >> >> around the world.
> >> >> >> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
> >> >> Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
> >> >> without being detected.
> >> >
> >> >How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
> >> >way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
> >> Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
> >> capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
> >> case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)
> >
> >Why would one be sitting in the cab of a truck? And wandering around a
> >city with a sniper rifle gets noticed.
> >
> The truck is the weapon of choice right now for terrorists in europe -
> also used a large "car bombs"
That's nice but it has nothing to do with anything I said so it is in no
sense a refutation.
> Sniper rifles break down and can be
> easily camoflauged - guitar case, etc - can be quickly set up on a
> roof or in an open window, virtually out of sight.
You need to quit getting your information about firearms from James Bond
movies.
> Ready to pick off
> as many random or targetted targets as one wants.
You mean make as much noise as one wants before the SWAT team arrives.
On 6/22/2017 11:27 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 6/22/17 11:19 AM, Leon wrote:
>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>
>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some
>> one else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>
>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>> option now, right London?
>
> This article about it is great!
> <http://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/lawsuit-home-depot-selling-4x4s-that-arent-4-inches-by-4-inches-everyone-else-they-arent-supposed-to-be-you-moron/>
>
>
>
Just wait until some one thinks a "stud" should be at least 8' long.
Because, you know, a stud is bigger than normal.
On 6/22/2017 10:27 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 6/22/17 11:19 AM, Leon wrote:
>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>
>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some
>> one else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>
>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>> option now, right London?
>
> This article about it is great!
> <http://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/lawsuit-home-depot-selling-4x4s-that-arent-4-inches-by-4-inches-everyone-else-they-arent-supposed-to-be-you-moron/>
>
Next they'll be suing Harbor Freight for selling 8'x10' tarps that are
really more like 7'6"x9'6". Or suing Payless for selling size 8 shoes
that are not all the same size.
On 6/22/2017 1:05 PM, Sonny wrote:
> On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 11:20:03 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>
>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>
>
> Leon's comment worded differently:
>
> "In a statement to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Yevgeniy (Eugene) Turin of McGuire Law claimed the suit is based on the fact that "reasonable consumers" are unaware of the difference between nominal (pre-surfacing of the four sides) and actual dimensions."
;~) A "Reasonable" person is lawyer speak. I learned long ago that
reasonable was used in place of "the way most "might" think".
The problem is that reasonable does not equal what is right or correct.
In this case, if all reasonable persons were educated to industry
standards they would not be upset about the measuring description that
has been used for many years. But reasonable or not the complainants
are not educated in this field.
Just wait until one of those entitled millennial's buys a "Skil" Saw and
is upset because it saw does not make the operator a skillful one.
>
> The key point in the above statement, and what the suit is based on, is "reasonable customers". It should be easy to prove those customers are definitely "not reasonable", hence the suit should be easily dismissed.
>
> One has to think unreasonably (be unreasonable), in order to dream-up an asinine case, as this.
>
> For those customers, HD & Menards should mandate (counter suit!) that they can only buy rough cut lumber.... and be further charged with filing frivolous law suits.
>
> Sonny
>
On 6/22/2017 2:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>
>>> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
>>
>> I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
>> between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
>> either but I think we both agree on that.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>> option now, right London?
>>>
>>> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
>>> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
>>>
>>
>> Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
>> will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
>>
>> And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
> around the world.
> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
>
On a side note and completely off the subject. I have been wanting to
thank you for mentioning Fluid Film a few months ago.
I picked up a can at Lowe's a few months ago and I like the stuff,
except for the fresh sprayed smell, but that goes away.
I forget exactly why I bought it but it worked. A few weeks later I
used some to tackle some rust, a repeated rust spot on the blade brake
lever on my 30 year old Honda lawn mower. I took that lever down to
bare metal, primed, and painted two times in the last three years and
the rust ame back quickly. My hand gets rusty red every time I mow the
yard. I sprayed some Fluid Film on the rusty spot and it has yet to
rust further nor color my hand red.
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 22:10:01 -0400, "J. Clarke"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>says...
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>> >says...
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>> >> >says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>> >> >> >> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>> >> >> >>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>> >> >> >>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
>> >> >> >between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
>> >> >> >either but I think we both agree on that.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>> >> >> >>> option now, right London?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
>> >> >> >> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
>> >> >> >will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
>> >> >> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
>> >> >> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
>> >> >> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
>> >> >> around the world.
>> >> >> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
>> >> >
>> >> >Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
>> >> Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
>> >> without being detected.
>> >
>> >How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
>> >way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
>> Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
>> capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
>> case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)
>
>Why would one be sitting in the cab of a truck? And wandering around a
>city with a sniper rifle gets noticed.
>
The truck is the weapon of choice right now for terrorists in europe -
also used a large "car bombs" Sniper rifles break down and can be
easily camoflauged - guitar case, etc - can be quickly set up on a
roof or in an open window, virtually out of sight. Ready to pick off
as many random or targetted targets as one wants.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>says...
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>> >> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>> >>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> >>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>> >>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>> >>
>> >> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
>> >
>> >I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
>> >between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
>> >either but I think we both agree on that.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>> >>> option now, right London?
>> >>
>> >> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
>> >> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
>> >will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
>> >
>> >And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
>> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
>> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
>> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
>> around the world.
>> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
>
>Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
without being detected.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:33:28 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:
>On 6/22/2017 11:27 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 6/22/17 11:19 AM, Leon wrote:
>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some
>>> one else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>
>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>> option now, right London?
>>
>> This article about it is great!
>> <http://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/lawsuit-home-depot-selling-4x4s-that-arent-4-inches-by-4-inches-everyone-else-they-arent-supposed-to-be-you-moron/>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Just wait until some one thinks a "stud" should be at least 8' long.
>Because, you know, a stud is bigger than normal.
But studs aren't 2" x 4". That would be just weird.
On 06/22/2017 07:40 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:46:35 GMT, [email protected] (Scott Lurndal)
> wrote:
>
>> -MIKE- <[email protected]> writes:
>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>
>> Actually, that has nothing to do with terrorism,
>> and everything to do with ambulance-chasing
>> lawyers.
>
> There's a difference?
>
Yeah, terrorists have principles.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:40:40 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:46:35 GMT, [email protected] (Scott Lurndal)
>wrote:
>
>>-MIKE- <[email protected]> writes:
>>>This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>
>>Actually, that has nothing to do with terrorism,
>>and everything to do with ambulance-chasing
>>lawyers.
>
>There's a difference?
How many lawyers laid end to end would it take to reach across San
Francisco bay?
Not enough.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>says...
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>> >says...
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>> >> >> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>> >> >>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> >> >>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>> >> >>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
>> >> >
>> >> >I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
>> >> >between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
>> >> >either but I think we both agree on that.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>> >> >>> option now, right London?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
>> >> >> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
>> >> >will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
>> >> >
>> >> >And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
>> >> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
>> >> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
>> >> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
>> >> around the world.
>> >> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
>> >
>> >Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
>> Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
>> without being detected.
>
>How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
>way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 22:10:01 -0400, "J. Clarke"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>says...
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>> >says...
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>> >> >says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>> >> >> >> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>> >> >> >>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>> >> >> >>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
>> >> >> >between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
>> >> >> >either but I think we both agree on that.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>> >> >> >>> option now, right London?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
>> >> >> >> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
>> >> >> >will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
>> >> >> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
>> >> >> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
>> >> >> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
>> >> >> around the world.
>> >> >> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
>> >> >
>> >> >Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
>> >> Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
>> >> without being detected.
>> >
>> >How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
>> >way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
>> Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
>> capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
>> case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)
>
>Why would one be sitting in the cab of a truck? And wandering around a
>city with a sniper rifle gets noticed.
>
Took a few weeks to notice these guys.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D.C._sniper_attacks
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:55:35 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:
>On 6/22/2017 12:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:19:46 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>
>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>> option now, right London?
>> I'll agree with "ignorant" and "uneducated" but it's got nothing to
>> do with whether they are liberal, conservative, Libertatian, or
>> anarchist.
>>
>And that is entirely true. I was just picturing the Youtube reactions
>of the young people, throwing temper tantrums, when Clinton lost the
>presidential election.
>
>
Can you imagine the temper tantrums from the "right" if the election
had been "stolen" from Trump?? Would have made the "liberal" hissyfit
look like a love-in!!
>
>> They are just plain STUPID, as is ANY lawfirm who would take it on as
>> a class action. INCREDIBLE!!!!
>>
On 2017-06-22, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'll agree with "ignorant" and "uneducated" but it's got nothing to
> do with whether they are liberal, conservative, Libertatian, or
> anarchist.
>
> They are just plain STUPID......
Oh! ....I thought you were discussing Drumph supporters. Here's my
favorite take on the subject:
*****NEWS FLASH*****
Zombies Cancel Zombie Apocalypse After Election Reveals America Has No
Brains!
********************
nb ;)
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:13:05 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:
>On 6/22/2017 2:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>>> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>>>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
>>>
>>> I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
>>> between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
>>> either but I think we both agree on that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>>> option now, right London?
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
>>>> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
>>> will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
>>>
>>> And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
>> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
>> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
>> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
>> around the world.
>> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
>>
>
>
>On a side note and completely off the subject. I have been wanting to
>thank you for mentioning Fluid Film a few months ago.
>I picked up a can at Lowe's a few months ago and I like the stuff,
>except for the fresh sprayed smell, but that goes away.
>
>I forget exactly why I bought it but it worked. A few weeks later I
>used some to tackle some rust, a repeated rust spot on the blade brake
>lever on my 30 year old Honda lawn mower. I took that lever down to
>bare metal, primed, and painted two times in the last three years and
>the rust ame back quickly. My hand gets rusty red every time I mow the
>yard. I sprayed some Fluid Film on the rusty spot and it has yet to
>rust further nor color my hand red.
That's experience. It was first recommended to me by my brother who
is still a mechanic. First time I used it was helping him replace some
shafts in the suspension of his old snow machine.He swore by it. I
tried it. Now I pretty much swear by it. It, along with Sea Foam and
Marvel Mystery Oil are always stock items around my shop (as well as
TapFree) Out at the hangar, "mouse milk" is the penetrant of choice,
Elsewhere, PB Blaster or Deep Creap. Once it's moving, it's a job for
the fluid film.
On 6/22/2017 12:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:19:46 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>
>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>
>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>> option now, right London?
> I'll agree with "ignorant" and "uneducated" but it's got nothing to
> do with whether they are liberal, conservative, Libertatian, or
> anarchist.
>
And that is entirely true. I was just picturing the Youtube reactions
of the young people, throwing temper tantrums, when Clinton lost the
presidential election.
> They are just plain STUPID, as is ANY lawfirm who would take it on as
> a class action. INCREDIBLE!!!!
>
-MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>
> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
It's those damn SJW millennials!!
https://mobile.twitter.com/Pamela_Moore13/status/877708903957446657
On 6/22/2017 1:44 PM, Keith Nuttle wrote:
> On 6/22/2017 2:05 PM, Sonny wrote:
>> On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 11:20:03 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>
>>
>> Leon's comment worded differently:
>>
>> "In a statement to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Yevgeniy (Eugene)
>> Turin of McGuire Law claimed the suit is based on the fact that
>> "reasonable consumers" are unaware of the difference between nominal
>> (pre-surfacing of the four sides) and actual dimensions."
>>
>> The key point in the above statement, and what the suit is based on,
>> is "reasonable customers". It should be easy to prove those
>> customers are definitely "not reasonable", hence the suit should be
>> easily dismissed.
>>
>> One has to think unreasonably (be unreasonable), in order to dream-up
>> an asinine case, as this.
>>
>> For those customers, HD & Menards should mandate (counter suit!) that
>> they can only buy rough cut lumber.... and be further charged with
>> filing frivolous law suits.
>>
>> Sonny
>>
> I have two comments on this thread. One: all motorized means of
> transportation should be eliminated. The last several muslim terrorist
> murders have been accomplished with autos, trucks and buses.
;~)
>
> Two: I am 73. When my grandfather was helping me with building project
> when I was in elementary school he told me why 2X4 were not actually 2"
> by 4"
Correct, and probably back then, when you were building this project,
2x4's were some where between 2x4 and 1.5x3.5" I have seen old 2x4's
that are larger than the ones we buy now.
>
> So that was common knowledge over 60 years ago.
>
> I guess when you spend your life in the virtual world of a smartphone,
> you do not learn about the real world.
>
>
I think you just set that nail exactly as you were taught. ;~)
On 6/22/17 11:19 AM, Leon wrote:
> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>
>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>
>>
>>
>
> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>
> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
> option now, right London?
This article about it is great!
<http://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/lawsuit-home-depot-selling-4x4s-that-arent-4-inches-by-4-inches-everyone-else-they-arent-supposed-to-be-you-moron/>
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 6/22/17 10:46 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> -MIKE- <[email protected]> writes:
>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>
> Actually, that has nothing to do with terrorism,
> and everything to do with ambulance-chasing
> lawyers.
>
Yeah, it was kind of a joke.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 6/22/17 11:08 AM, Spalted Walt wrote:
> -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>
>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>
> It's those damn SJW millennials!!
>
> https://mobile.twitter.com/Pamela_Moore13/status/877708903957446657
>
That was brilliant!
Make sure you see part one, also.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com
On 6/22/2017 2:05 PM, Sonny wrote:
> On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 11:20:03 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>
>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>
>
> Leon's comment worded differently:
>
> "In a statement to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Yevgeniy (Eugene) Turin of McGuire Law claimed the suit is based on the fact that "reasonable consumers" are unaware of the difference between nominal (pre-surfacing of the four sides) and actual dimensions."
>
> The key point in the above statement, and what the suit is based on, is "reasonable customers". It should be easy to prove those customers are definitely "not reasonable", hence the suit should be easily dismissed.
>
> One has to think unreasonably (be unreasonable), in order to dream-up an asinine case, as this.
>
> For those customers, HD & Menards should mandate (counter suit!) that they can only buy rough cut lumber.... and be further charged with filing frivolous law suits.
>
> Sonny
>
I have two comments on this thread. One: all motorized means of
transportation should be eliminated. The last several muslim terrorist
murders have been accomplished with autos, trucks and buses.
Two: I am 73. When my grandfather was helping me with building project
when I was in elementary school he told me why 2X4 were not actually 2"
by 4"
So that was common knowledge over 60 years ago.
I guess when you spend your life in the virtual world of a smartphone,
you do not learn about the real world.
--
2017: The year we lean to play the great game of Euchre
On 6/22/2017 4:27 PM, Markem wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:48:04 -0600, Just Wondering
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 6/22/2017 10:27 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>> On 6/22/17 11:19 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some
>>>> one else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>> option now, right London?
>>>
>>> This article about it is great!
>>> <http://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/lawsuit-home-depot-selling-4x4s-that-arent-4-inches-by-4-inches-everyone-else-they-arent-supposed-to-be-you-moron/>
>>>
>> Next they'll be suing Harbor Freight for selling 8'x10' tarps that are
>> really more like 7'6"x9'6". Or suing Payless for selling size 8 shoes
>> that are not all the same size.
>
> Hey it worked for computer monitors, 14 inches they were not.
>
I wonder how many people are involved in this class actions suit if they
are only going for 5 million dollars
--
2017: The year we lean to play the great game of Euchre
-MIKE- wrote:
> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>
> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>
>
One problem is a (typical) litigant would have to prove you he or she
was fooled and have damages. And anyone savvy enough to incur
meaningful damages wood not be fooled. I don't think making it a class
action lawsuit changes anything.
On 6/22/2017 9:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:55:35 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/22/2017 12:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:19:46 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>> option now, right London?
>>> I'll agree with "ignorant" and "uneducated" but it's got nothing to
>>> do with whether they are liberal, conservative, Libertatian, or
>>> anarchist.
>>>
>> And that is entirely true. I was just picturing the Youtube reactions
>> of the young people, throwing temper tantrums, when Clinton lost the
>> presidential election.
>>
>>
> Can you imagine the temper tantrums from the "right" if the election
> had been "stolen" from Trump?? Would have made the "liberal" hissyfit
> look like a love-in!!
You mean like the riots that occurred when obama was elected? ;-)
--
2017: The year we lean to play the great game of Euchre
On 6/22/2017 9:56 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>> says...
>>>
>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>>>> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>>>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>>>>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
>>>>
>>>> I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
>>>> between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
>>>> either but I think we both agree on that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>>>> option now, right London?
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
>>>>> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
>>>> will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
>>>>
>>>> And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
>>> The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
>>> particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
>>> and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
>>> around the world.
>>> Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
>>
>> Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
> Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
> without being detected.
>
did you read about the Canadian sniper who took out a muslim terrorist
at over two miles.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/22/canadian-sniper-sets-world-record-with-2-1-mile-pickoff-isis-fighter.html
--
2017: The year we lean to play the great game of Euchre
On 6/23/2017 8:36 AM, Dr. Deb wrote:
>
> Leon, just remember, if liberal are not intelligent enough to understand lumber sizing, they are hopeless when it comes to corrective criticism. After all, THEY are the cultural elite - right ? ;-)
>
They think they are!
--
2017: The year we lean to play the great game of Euchre
On 6/22/2017 4:13 PM, Leon wrote:
>
>
> On a side note and completely off the subject. I have been wanting to
> thank you for mentioning Fluid Film a few months ago.
> I picked up a can at Lowe's a few months ago and I like the stuff,
> except for the fresh sprayed smell, but that goes away.
>
> I forget exactly why I bought it but it worked. A few weeks later I
> used some to tackle some rust, a repeated rust spot on the blade brake
> lever on my 30 year old Honda lawn mower. I took that lever down to
> bare metal, primed, and painted two times in the last three years and
> the rust ame back quickly. My hand gets rusty red every time I mow the
> yard. I sprayed some Fluid Film on the rusty spot and it has yet to
> rust further nor color my hand red.
Thanks Leon, I'll have to get some of that.
Speaking of Amazon, looking for the product, at Lowe's it was $9.99 and
at Amazon, $13.14, plus shipping, over 30% more, plus shipping. Damn,
Amazon is really out to lunch on so much stuff.
--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com
On 6/23/2017 11:57 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 6/23/2017 10:38 AM, Jack wrote:
>> On 6/22/2017 4:13 PM, Leon wrote:
>
>> Thanks Leon, I'll have to get some of that.
>>
>> Speaking of Amazon, looking for the product, at Lowe's it was $9.99
>> and at Amazon, $13.14, plus shipping, over 30% more, plus shipping.
>> Damn, Amazon is really out to lunch on so much stuff.
>
>
> You did not check completely. You can find it in the right column for
> $10.99 free shipping from Sim supply.
>
> https://smile.amazon.com/As11-Fluid-Film-11-75oz-Spray/dp/B00PWZ0XNM/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1498232998&sr=8-2&keywords=fluid+film+spray
>
>
> The $13.14 price is free shipping if you have Prime and want it in two
> days.
>
> Amazon is not always the lowest price but you also have to factor in the
> time and cost of a trip to Lowes. For me, it is about $7 if I go alone,
> about $37 if my wife goes and we stop for lunch.
She lets you off cheap.
Anyway, my price was without shipping, but shipping was free if you
spent 25 bucks or more, so bring your wife and it was just 30% more,
unless you are sitting at the console with the wife...
Also, I usually put stuff I want (not need) on my cell phone list app
and when I go shopping for something I need, I check my app for stuff
like this, so the trip is happening anyway.
--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com
snotblob <[email protected]> gurgled:
> Oh! ....I thought you were discussing Drumph supporters. Here's my
> favorite take on the subject:
>
> *****NEWS FLASH*****
>
> Zombies Cancel Zombie Apocalypse After Election Reveals America Has No
> Brains!
>
> ********************
http://i.imgur.com/9l2gdWA.jpg
HTH HAND
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:02:50 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:
>On 6/22/2017 1:44 PM, Keith Nuttle wrote:
>> On 6/22/2017 2:05 PM, Sonny wrote:
>>> On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 11:20:03 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Leon's comment worded differently:
>>>
>>> "In a statement to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Yevgeniy (Eugene)
>>> Turin of McGuire Law claimed the suit is based on the fact that
>>> "reasonable consumers" are unaware of the difference between nominal
>>> (pre-surfacing of the four sides) and actual dimensions."
>>>
>>> The key point in the above statement, and what the suit is based on,
>>> is "reasonable customers". It should be easy to prove those
>>> customers are definitely "not reasonable", hence the suit should be
>>> easily dismissed.
>>>
>>> One has to think unreasonably (be unreasonable), in order to dream-up
>>> an asinine case, as this.
>>>
>>> For those customers, HD & Menards should mandate (counter suit!) that
>>> they can only buy rough cut lumber.... and be further charged with
>>> filing frivolous law suits.
>>>
>>> Sonny
>>>
>> I have two comments on this thread. One: all motorized means of
>> transportation should be eliminated. The last several muslim terrorist
>> murders have been accomplished with autos, trucks and buses.
>
>;~)
>
>>
>> Two: I am 73. When my grandfather was helping me with building project
>> when I was in elementary school he told me why 2X4 were not actually 2"
>> by 4"
>
>Correct, and probably back then, when you were building this project,
>2x4's were some where between 2x4 and 1.5x3.5" I have seen old 2x4's
>that are larger than the ones we buy now.
https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/misc/miscpub_6409.pdf
Anyone want to send this to the defense attorneys?
>
>>
>> So that was common knowledge over 60 years ago.
>>
>> I guess when you spend your life in the virtual world of a smartphone,
>> you do not learn about the real world.
>>
>>
>I think you just set that nail exactly as you were taught. ;~)
Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>
>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>
>>
>>
>
>A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
>
>And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>option now, right London?
Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:46:35 GMT, [email protected] (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:
>-MIKE- <[email protected]> writes:
>>This is why the terrorists hate us.
>
>Actually, that has nothing to do with terrorism,
>and everything to do with ambulance-chasing
>lawyers.
There's a difference?
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:
>On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> writes:
>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>
>> Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?
>
>I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
>between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
>either but I think we both agree on that.
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>> option now, right London?
>>
>> Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
>> with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.
>>
>
>Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
>will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.
>
>And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
around the world.
Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -
-MIKE- <[email protected]> writes:
>This is why the terrorists hate us.
Actually, that has nothing to do with terrorism,
and everything to do with ambulance-chasing
lawyers.
On 6/23/2017 10:38 AM, Jack wrote:
> On 6/22/2017 4:13 PM, Leon wrote:
> Thanks Leon, I'll have to get some of that.
>
> Speaking of Amazon, looking for the product, at Lowe's it was $9.99 and
> at Amazon, $13.14, plus shipping, over 30% more, plus shipping. Damn,
> Amazon is really out to lunch on so much stuff.
You did not check completely. You can find it in the right column for
$10.99 free shipping from Sim supply.
https://smile.amazon.com/As11-Fluid-Film-11-75oz-Spray/dp/B00PWZ0XNM/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1498232998&sr=8-2&keywords=fluid+film+spray
The $13.14 price is free shipping if you have Prime and want it in two
days.
Amazon is not always the lowest price but you also have to factor in the
time and cost of a trip to Lowes. For me, it is about $7 if I go alone,
about $37 if my wife goes and we stop for lunch.
On 6/22/2017 8:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:55:35 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/22/2017 12:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:19:46 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
>>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>> option now, right London?
>>> I'll agree with "ignorant" and "uneducated" but it's got nothing to
>>> do with whether they are liberal, conservative, Libertatian, or
>>> anarchist.
>>>
>> And that is entirely true. I was just picturing the Youtube reactions
>> of the young people, throwing temper tantrums, when Clinton lost the
>> presidential election.
>>
>>
> Can you imagine the temper tantrums from the "right" if the election
> had been "stolen" from Trump?? Would have made the "liberal" hissyfit
> look like a love-in!!
>>
>>> They are just plain STUPID, as is ANY lawfirm who would take it on as
>>> a class action. INCREDIBLE!!!!
>>>
>
I do not recall seeing that when Obama won.
On 6/22/2017 8:19 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:27:13 -0500, Markem <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:48:04 -0600, Just Wondering
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/22/2017 10:27 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> On 6/22/17 11:19 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some
>>>>> one else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>>> option now, right London?
>>>>
>>>> This article about it is great!
>>>> <http://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/lawsuit-home-depot-selling-4x4s-that-arent-4-inches-by-4-inches-everyone-else-they-arent-supposed-to-be-you-moron/>
>>>>
>>> Next they'll be suing Harbor Freight for selling 8'x10' tarps that are
>>> really more like 7'6"x9'6". Or suing Payless for selling size 8 shoes
>>> that are not all the same size.
>>
>> Hey it worked for computer monitors, 14 inches they were not.
> Now thet are "14 inch class" or "22 inch class" With TVs years back,
> the same TV sold as a 27 inch in USA was a 26 inch in Canada.
>
I recall seeing ab advertized 17" monitor that was actually 15.75" More
than a size smaller.
On 6/22/2017 9:35 PM, Keith Nuttle wrote:
> On 6/22/2017 9:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:55:35 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/22/2017 12:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:19:46 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>>> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting
>>>>> some one
>>>>> else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
>>>>> option now, right London?
>>>> I'll agree with "ignorant" and "uneducated" but it's got nothing to
>>>> do with whether they are liberal, conservative, Libertatian, or
>>>> anarchist.
>>>>
>>> And that is entirely true. I was just picturing the Youtube reactions
>>> of the young people, throwing temper tantrums, when Clinton lost the
>>> presidential election.
>>>
>>>
>> Can you imagine the temper tantrums from the "right" if the election
>> had been "stolen" from Trump?? Would have made the "liberal" hissyfit
>> look like a love-in!!
>
> You mean like the riots that occurred when obama was elected? ;-)
>
>
>
I think the race riots happens well after Obama was elected, that was on
him.
On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> This is why the terrorists hate us.
>
> <http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes>
>
>
>
A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.
And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
option now, right London?