--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted on Sun, Mar. 20, 2005
Carpenter's tips for life as well as the shop
I read for information, not for pleasure. This puts me at odds with
everyone in my house but the dog.
And it is, I've discovered, the most efficient way to accumulate the
latest wisdom available and commit it to memory so I can better serve
my readers.
I do feel guilty about it sometimes, so when I have an opportunity for
expiation, I try to take it.
Fortunately, that's what The Carpenter's Notebook has offered me. The
book (CenterLine Publishing, $16.95), by Mark Clement of Ambler, is
the best of both worlds: a novel that incorporates information you can
use in the workshop.
It sounds strange, I know, but after finishing the book, I'm ready to
make the all-too-late suggestion to Jane Austen that if she had just
included some furniture-building tips in Pride and Prejudice, I might
not have used her book as a doorstop.
Appearing almost seamlessly within Clement's narrative are a few pages
of instructions, complete with illustrations, on how to make a toolbox
or frame a doorway.
Even if you've never picked up a hammer, it's hard to argue with the
idea that carpentry is a metaphor for life, and Clement, executive
editor of Tools of the Trade magazine, has run with that.
His story is that of Brendan Herlihy, an unhappy bloke whose marriage
is on the rocks and whose real estate career is about as exciting as
filling nail holes in cedar siding.
With marriage counseling going nowhere, Herlihy decides to send his
girls off to camp and spend the summer away from his wife and with his
mother, completing the artist's studio that his contractor father,
Gideon, had begun carving out of his shop for her before his death two
years earlier.
The notebook of the title is Gideon's, a contractor's clipboard with
yellowed sheets of paper that provide Brendan with an outline on how
to live his life. Gideon had offered these life lessons to Brendan
when the boy was growing up, but Brendan neither understood their
meaning nor seemed interested in even listening.
Only now, after his father's death, does Brendan realize that by
working hard and using Gideon's tools and rules, he will finally be
able to find the answers that will give his life meaning.
"All the lessons Gideon learned on job sites Brendan uses to rebuild
his life," said carpenter-turned-writer/editor Clement, whose own
father was a professor and with whom, he acknowledges, he wasn't
close. Clement, then, is both Gideon and Brendan, applying his
carpentry skills to sorting out Brendan's life.
Clement, 36, also applied those skills to his own life. Like
Brendan's, his marriage fell apart and ended in divorce. He decided to
move to Ambler from Virginia to be near his daughter, Alexis, 3, who
lives nearby with his ex-wife.
"Through carpentry, I learned to do the right thing," Clement said.
"The very same skills one uses to renovate a house or build a table
are transferable to life. That's what I found out, and that's what
Gideon found out and passed down in those notes to Brendan.
"If you aren't always on top of what you are doing, if you aren't
paying attention to your job all the time, it can put you in danger,"
he said. "If you are working on the roof and forget for a moment where
you are, you can fall off the ladder. These very same skills are
transferable to your life.
"I need to be there for Alexis, whether it is watching her play soccer
or taking her to ballet class. When you find something that works, you
stick with it, whether it is carpentry or in your relationships with
other people."
A lot of people approach life in the way that makes them most
comfortable. But, as Brendan learns, the time comes when you have to
swallow hard and do something that makes you uncomfortable - in his
case, ending a marriage that wasn't really doing him or his wife any
good and that would eventually do more damage to their children.
"Brendan found his answer through carpentry, by spending the summer
rebuilding the shop into a studio," Clement said. "There is a right
answer, but you won't begin to look for one until you know that one
does exist.
"Brendan, and I, learned the right thing to do."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"On the House" appears Sundays in The Inquirer. Contact Alan J.
Heavens at 215-854-2472 or [email protected].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2005 Philadelphia Inquirer and wire service sources. All Rights
Reserved.
http://www.philly.com
Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:47:53 GMT, "Don" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>OK, apparently this thread has veered over into places I'm not aware of or
>used to, so I'll just bow out.
>No offense intended, Tom.
>Now I'll go back to semi-lurking. ;-)
>
Hell, I wasn't offended.
I figured you guys were goofing on me, so I goofed back.
I say we blame it all on C-less.
Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)
The plot sounds vaguely familiar though the one I'm
thinking of involves a ferryman (no, not fairy man,
predating Ahnolds Girly Man). Siddhartha I think it
was by some guy name Herman something .
As for Saturn - the Planet is Saturn 0, the rockets
were Saturn 1 through 5, the car line should be
sATURN. Everyone clear now?
charlie b
Tom Watson wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Posted on Sun, Mar. 20, 2005
>
>
>
> Carpenter's tips for life as well as the shop
>
>
You lost me at about the fifth paragraph.
--
Gerald Ross
Cochran, GA
I remember when Saturns were rockets,
not cars.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:03:55 -0800, Larry Jaques
<novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>My mistake. I saw the simple snip in Don's post there and thought it
>was your personal opinion, over which I lamented. Shame on you, Don,
>for misleading me. ;-/
Actually, I thought youse guys was breakin' my stones, just fer fun ya
know.
Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:52:18 GMT, "Leon"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Gerald Ross" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>
>> I remember when Saturns were rockets,
>> not cars.
>>
>
>
>And I remember when Saturn was a planet, not the name of a rocket. ;~)
>
If'n you was really old, you'd remember when he was a Roman god.
(watson- who remembers fondly a group of loose women that he used to
know - and the name of their vehicle - The Slattern Five....sigh...)
Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)
"Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:25:40 -0800, Larry Jaques
> <novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:30:39 GMT, the inscrutable "Don"
>><[email protected]> spake:
>>
>>>"Tom Watson"> wrote
>>>> I read for information, not for pleasure.
>>>
>>>Reading for information IS my pleasure.
>>>And yes, I walk this path alone at my home.
>>
>>Ditto. I enjoy a combination of both. Poor Tawm.
>>
>>
>> ---
>>After they make styrofoam, what do they ship it in? --Steven Wright
>> http://diversify.com Comprehensive Website Development
>
>
> Then I will have to make the sad assumption that you are both lacking
> in the comprehension skills required to pursue this activity in a
> fully pleasurable way.
>
> Assuming that you are not being deliberately obtuse; may I point out
> that I was quoting a newspaper article, not expressing a personal
> opinion.
This is at least the 2nd time you've gotten defensive over a simple cut and
paste job, why?
And your assumption about my *comprehension skills* is embarrassing and
revealing.
What do you call it when someone posts a message then slams the people that
respond to it?
"Gerald Ross" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I remember when Saturns were rockets,
> not cars.
>
And I remember when Saturn was a planet, not the name of a rocket. ;~)
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:16:53 -0500, Gerald Ross
<[email protected]> wrote:
>You lost me at about the fifth paragraph.
You musta got lost before that, 'cause I didn't write the damned
thing.
I wanted to see if anybody had read that book.
Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:30:39 GMT, the inscrutable "Don"
<[email protected]> spake:
>"Tom Watson"> wrote
>> I read for information, not for pleasure.
>
>Reading for information IS my pleasure.
>And yes, I walk this path alone at my home.
Ditto. I enjoy a combination of both. Poor Tawm.
---
After they make styrofoam, what do they ship it in? --Steven Wright
http://diversify.com Comprehensive Website Development
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:25:40 -0800, Larry Jaques
<novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:30:39 GMT, the inscrutable "Don"
><[email protected]> spake:
>
>>"Tom Watson"> wrote
>>> I read for information, not for pleasure.
>>
>>Reading for information IS my pleasure.
>>And yes, I walk this path alone at my home.
>
>Ditto. I enjoy a combination of both. Poor Tawm.
>
>
> ---
>After they make styrofoam, what do they ship it in? --Steven Wright
> http://diversify.com Comprehensive Website Development
Then I will have to make the sad assumption that you are both lacking
in the comprehension skills required to pursue this activity in a
fully pleasurable way.
Assuming that you are not being deliberately obtuse; may I point out
that I was quoting a newspaper article, not expressing a personal
opinion.
Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:22:56 -0500, the inscrutable Tom Watson
<[email protected]> spake:
>On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:47:53 GMT, "Don" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>OK, apparently this thread has veered over into places I'm not aware of or
>>used to, so I'll just bow out.
>>No offense intended, Tom.
>>Now I'll go back to semi-lurking. ;-)
>
>Hell, I wasn't offended.
>
>I figured you guys were goofing on me, so I goofed back.
>
>I say we blame it all on C-less.
Sure, go ahead. Everyone else does. <sigh>
--
People will occasionally stumble over the truth, but
most of the time they'll pick themselves up and carry on.
--anon
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:46:29 -0500, the inscrutable Tom Watson
<[email protected]> spake:
>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:16:53 -0500, Gerald Ross
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>You lost me at about the fifth paragraph.
>
>You musta got lost before that, 'cause I didn't write the damned
>thing.
<g>
>I wanted to see if anybody had read that book.
Then why dincha say so? I checked my Leebrary and found no joy.
It appears that Centerline has a sample chapter for your perusal.
http://www.centerlinemedia.com/tcn.htm The verdict's not in yet.
---
After they make styrofoam, what do they ship it in? --Steven Wright
http://diversify.com Comprehensive Website Development
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:06:50 -0500, the inscrutable Tom Watson
<[email protected]> spake:
>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:25:40 -0800, Larry Jaques
><novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:30:39 GMT, the inscrutable "Don"
>><[email protected]> spake:
>>
>>>"Tom Watson"> wrote
>>>> I read for information, not for pleasure.
>>>
>>>Reading for information IS my pleasure.
>>>And yes, I walk this path alone at my home.
>>
>>Ditto. I enjoy a combination of both. Poor Tawm.
>
>Then I will have to make the sad assumption that you are both lacking
>in the comprehension skills required to pursue this activity in a
>fully pleasurable way.
>
>Assuming that you are not being deliberately obtuse; may I point out
>that I was quoting a newspaper article, not expressing a personal
>opinion.
My mistake. I saw the simple snip in Don's post there and thought it
was your personal opinion, over which I lamented. Shame on you, Don,
for misleading me. ;-/
--
People will occasionally stumble over the truth, but
most of the time they'll pick themselves up and carry on.
--anon
OK, apparently this thread has veered over into places I'm not aware of or
used to, so I'll just bow out.
No offense intended, Tom.
Now I'll go back to semi-lurking. ;-)
"Larry Jaques" <novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:06:50 -0500, the inscrutable Tom Watson
> <[email protected]> spake:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:25:40 -0800, Larry Jaques
>><novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:30:39 GMT, the inscrutable "Don"
>>><[email protected]> spake:
>>>
>>>>"Tom Watson"> wrote
>>>>> I read for information, not for pleasure.
>>>>
>>>>Reading for information IS my pleasure.
>>>>And yes, I walk this path alone at my home.
>>>
>>>Ditto. I enjoy a combination of both. Poor Tawm.
>>
>>Then I will have to make the sad assumption that you are both lacking
>>in the comprehension skills required to pursue this activity in a
>>fully pleasurable way.
>>
>>Assuming that you are not being deliberately obtuse; may I point out
>>that I was quoting a newspaper article, not expressing a personal
>>opinion.
>
> My mistake. I saw the simple snip in Don's post there and thought it
> was your personal opinion, over which I lamented. Shame on you, Don,
> for misleading me. ;-/
>
>
> --
>
> People will occasionally stumble over the truth, but
> most of the time they'll pick themselves up and carry on.
> --anon
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:53:34 -0500, the inscrutable Tom Watson
<[email protected]> spake:
>On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:03:55 -0800, Larry Jaques
><novalidaddress@di\/ersify.com> wrote:
>
>
>>My mistake. I saw the simple snip in Don's post there and thought it
>>was your personal opinion, over which I lamented. Shame on you, Don,
>>for misleading me. ;-/
>
>Actually, I thought youse guys was breakin' my stones, just fer fun ya
>know.
I rectum it's all that poetry what fugdjaup, Tawm. Ayup.
--
People will occasionally stumble over the truth, but
most of the time they'll pick themselves up and carry on.
--anon