http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex1351?opendocument
Seems to be sufficient instruction. I didn't peruse this closely,
as I have no desire in the world to make something that requires that
much work to operate. Besides, I don't like fireplaces anyway, and
haven't used mine for going on 20 years or more. One of these days tho,
I'll make a fancy stand for candles, and use that in it. Damn things
don't put out enough heat to use for anything but decoration.
JOAT
A highbrow is a person educated beyond his intelligence.
- Brander Matthews
If your fireplace dosen't put out enought heat to force you to open your
windows then somethings wrong!
I have two FP's both with built in blower boxes, if I fire up the main it
will heat 1800 Sq ft on the primary side of the house, If I fire up the
secondary and open the French doors all 3400 sq ft of the house will go to
about 80 degrees In about two hours or so.Give or take. Usually lighting the
main will suffice for most the winter and for family gatherings the
secondary will do. By the end of those days I'll be sitting out on the
veranda til the house cools!
Searcher1
Fri, May 6, 2005, 12:40pm (EDT+4) [email protected] (Searcher1) says:
If your fireplace dosen't put out <>
I got an e-mail on this, which is the only reason I'm responding at
all. I hadn't intended on tracking this.
You guys are missing the point. My point. I thing fireplaces are
great. Not as efficient as a woodburning stove tho. BUT, I'm not
interested in anything that require that much work input, with so little
return. Well, maybe dating.
I have a fireplace. The ex wanted one. She did NOT want a
woodburning stove. So. And, it looks good. Big, massive, stands out
from the wall, has a blower, actully works quite well - for a fireplace.
By not using it, I no longer have to split wood, stack wood, bring
wood in, feet the fire, clean the chimney, clean the ashes out, etc.,
etc. I have a glass screen and all so there's not some gapping hole
there. If I don't do the candle thing, I've thought of getting one of
the phoney electric fire thngies, maybe with a heter, maybe not. Then
get all the benefit of a fireplace (fire, romantic aura) without the
work.
If I need 'mergency heat, the fireplace will be the last choice.
i've got a neato little propane heater i got for my shop, that works
like a champ. Or, I've got a kerosene heater that works quite well, and
spare kerosene for it.
So, no matter what any of you guys say, the only way I'll accept a
fireplace as a viable source of heat for me, is with someone else doing
all the work and fuel supplying.
Later
JOAT
A highbrow is a person educated beyond his intelligence.
- Brander Matthews
Good post as most of your finds are. However, I think the guy that
posted this one is off here and there.
I hear what you're saying about the work associated with a fireplace as
my primary heat source is a wood stove, but...
Where are you getting free fuel for your furnace?
Last time I checked everyone I know works for a living to pay for minor
luxuries like heating fuel. If I didn't have a woodstove, the
inefficient propane monster in the mudroom would run constantly.
(Actually poor ductwork). I'd hate to think of how many thousands of
dollars this would cost me every year and be less comfortable. I just
spent about a week doing the yearly wood thing and I have two winter's
supply of high test cherry that will keep my house at a balmy 80+
degrees here in MD. Of course little things like a 24" saw, 28 ton wood
splitter and bobcat go a long way in saving the ol' back. I'm a lowly
public servant, I can't earn thousands of dollars in a week (equipment
borrowed).
You might consider a propane insert - complete with remote!
J T wrote:
> Fri, May 6, 2005, 12:40pm (EDT+4) [email protected] (Searcher1) says:
> If your fireplace dosen't put out <>
>
> I got an e-mail on this, which is the only reason I'm responding at
> all. I hadn't intended on tracking this.
>
> You guys are missing the point. My point. I thing fireplaces are
> great. Not as efficient as a woodburning stove tho. BUT, I'm not
> interested in anything that require that much work input, with so little
> return. Well, maybe dating.
>
> I have a fireplace. The ex wanted one. She did NOT want a
> woodburning stove. So. And, it looks good. Big, massive, stands out
> from the wall, has a blower, actully works quite well - for a fireplace.
>
> By not using it, I no longer have to split wood, stack wood, bring
> wood in, feet the fire, clean the chimney, clean the ashes out, etc.,
> etc. I have a glass screen and all so there's not some gapping hole
> there. If I don't do the candle thing, I've thought of getting one of
> the phoney electric fire thngies, maybe with a heter, maybe not. Then
> get all the benefit of a fireplace (fire, romantic aura) without the
> work.
>
> If I need 'mergency heat, the fireplace will be the last choice.
> i've got a neato little propane heater i got for my shop, that works
> like a champ. Or, I've got a kerosene heater that works quite well, and
> spare kerosene for it.
>
> So, no matter what any of you guys say, the only way I'll accept a
> fireplace as a viable source of heat for me, is with someone else doing
> all the work and fuel supplying.
>
> Later
>
>
>
> JOAT
> A highbrow is a person educated beyond his intelligence.
> - Brander Matthews
>