Did it fill with one or two applications on oak? What exactly didn't you
"get"? Did it shrink a lot? Did you apply, scrape with a plastic
card, wipe, then lightly sand?
David
[email protected] wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:42:32 -0800, David <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Anyone here used both? If so, which do you like best? I'm considering
>>trying a clear filler. I figure on application order of dye, filler,
>>sealer, and top coats, on red oak. I've not been happy with the opaque
>>filler I've used.
>>
>>David
>
>
>
> I've used the enduro, once. I don't think I quite get it yet. I'll
> give it another try or two before I give up.
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:42:32 -0800, David <[email protected]> wrote:
>Anyone here used both? If so, which do you like best? I'm considering
>trying a clear filler. I figure on application order of dye, filler,
>sealer, and top coats, on red oak. I've not been happy with the opaque
>filler I've used.
>
>David
I've used the enduro, once. I don't think I quite get it yet. I'll
give it another try or two before I give up.
>[email protected] wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:42:32 -0800, David <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Anyone here used both? If so, which do you like best? I'm considering
>>>trying a clear filler. I figure on application order of dye, filler,
>>>sealer, and top coats, on red oak. I've not been happy with the opaque
>>>filler I've used.
>>>
>>>David
>>
>>
>>
>> I've used the enduro, once. I don't think I quite get it yet. I'll
>> give it another try or two before I give up.
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:37:55 -0800, David <[email protected]> wrote:
>Did it fill with one or two applications on oak? What exactly didn't you
> "get"? Did it shrink a lot? Did you apply, scrape with a plastic
>card, wipe, then lightly sand?
>
>David
>
it was on walnut, not oak.
I had problems getting it into the pores. it would *seem* to be
covering well, but once sanded the pores were still unfilled. I also
had problems with the tool marks from the plastic card being visible
after it dries. I guess it's a "one stroke" kinda product- no going
back at all.