New woodworking newsgroup for all ages fam.woodworking

Susan Welchel wrote:
> This is an announcement.
>
> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry the
> fam.* hierarchy.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Susan Welchel
> Administration Team for fam.* news hierarchy
> http://www.family-usenet.com

cool. I've been a little shy about using words like fuck on
rec.woodworking because my friends hang around here. but now I don't
have to be so reserved... I'm happy to hear your news that there's a
newsgroup just for using the word fuck in a woodworking context. thank
you so much, susan...

Why all the hostitility to this announcement? Is there some history
here that I don't know about? If there's an audience for a moderated
group, it will make it, otherwise, it will fail.



Susan Welchel wrote:
> This is an announcement.
>

bf wrote:
> Why all the hostitility to this announcement? Is there some history
> here that I don't know about? If there's an audience for a moderated
> group, it will make it, otherwise, it will fail.


do a google search for vito kuhn. there is a lot of history, none of it
nice.

Well I think a family-oriented and moderated woodworking group is a
marvellous idea. I would never let anyone under the age of 21 read
this NG with all of its sexual references thinly disguised as
"woodworking" talk. We all know what a "dado" really is, especially
you lesbians. And just try and convince me that "mortice and tenon"
isn't a shameless code for filthy procreation. And the very thought of
what a butt joint or half lap might be makes me shudder. I don't think
I need descend any further on this subject.

Welcome a return to wholesome family woodworking values!

The Reverend FoggyTown

PJR, <[email protected]>, whose name means "likes to autograph bed
pans; devious and sly, not to be trusted", emitted:

> That's easy fir yew to say.

Why do you say that's easy for me to say, PJR?

> PJR [IDIOTICON].

*CHUCKS UP BREAKFAST*

Would you mind using those [IDIOTICON]s /before/ I've eaten, please?

PJR, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Did you have any wood to discuss, abuser?

I like to talk to people.

> <snecks fam.woodworking> <waits to see what happens> PJR [IDIOTICON].

That [IDIOTICON] looks good on you, though not as good as a doberman.

PJR, <[email protected]>, whose name means "has steep,
backward-sloping forhead; shy", illumined:

> That's good, Fred.

Please remember you do not speak for Dad.

> Are you capable of talking to people about woodworking in a manner that
> would not offend a kindergarten child?

Good conversation is always a joy.

> I don't think fam.pets has been created yet.

Someday you will think fam.pets has been created yet.

> Perhaps you ought to request it.

Probably never had the right kind of mother.

erp.jbbqjbexvat,snz.jbbqjbexvat,nyg.hfrarg.xbbxf,nyg.s
> hpxabmmyrf" - *qvat*

I heard that.

Bob Officer, <[email protected]>, whose name means "wears a wig;
weirdo", effused:

> Why would you chuck up breakfast.

You are too fat because you eat too much.

> are you going to turn the toast?

Are you jealous?

> Are the biscuits so hard you have to use a biscuit cutter?

So many opportunities.

> Heh!

Heh, what, old chap? Pip! Pip! Heh what?

X-No-Archive: YES
Bob Officer has offered into testimony
[email protected]

> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>> group exists also?
>>
>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>> crossposts will be coming from.
>
> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>
>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>> will be. And it will be.
>
> No fooling...

Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks, yet?

--

Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208
ChadwickStone at Gmail dot com
Usenet's most helpful netizen
Hammer of Thor, March 2005

PJR <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick
>>>> Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>
>>>>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>yet?
>>>>
>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>
>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said
>>>> Supernews had it set up.
>>>>
>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>>>
>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>
>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
>>> new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
>>> hardness of the wood.
>>
>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>
>That's easy fir yew to say.

Oak this, swine.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler

"Don't be too envious. Yes, I have got it all. I am rich, I
have a good education, and I am rather good looking .. so
where does that leave you?
C."
-- Charles D. "Chuckweasel" Bohne polishes his ego a bit

"That's what you expect from people who think that the
cyberworld isn't "RL"."
-- Dr. David Tholen, Psychic Astrologer

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:31:01 -0400, in rec.woodworking, Susan Welchel
<[email protected]> wrote:

>This is an announcement.
>
>There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
>friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
>please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry the
>fam.* hierarchy.
>
>Thank you.

For you brand of "Family" oriented censorship,

no thanks.

Every User has a delete key and the power to decide what they will or won't
read.


--
Ak'toh'di

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:31:01 -0400, Susan Welchel <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is an announcement.
>
> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry the
> fam.* hierarchy.

I _am_ my usenet administrator. Based on your track record, I won't be
bothering.

> Thank you.

And goodbye.

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:43:39 -0400, Lee Michaels <[email protected]> wrote:
> And this all ages-family crap?? How does this apply to woodworking? Am I
> suppose to show my three year old neice how to play with table saws and
> routers? Talking about power tools with small children?? This sound far
> more dangerous than any moronic line of logic these folks could muster up.

And they think the trolls won't specifically seek them out. Sadly, that
will without a doubt be the result of all this. We _did_ try to tell
them.

On 22 Jul 2005 11:57:37 -0700, bf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Why all the hostitility to this announcement? Is there some history
> here that I don't know about?

Yup. Tons of it. Susan and - what's his name - Leo or Leon or
something - wandered in here, pronounced us unfit, and blundered through
several iterations of telling us what was good for us, except that they
never came here to make their case, they just tried to come up with
groups to save us from ourselves. In the process, forged emails,
massive vote fraud, and continued absence of building support here
ensued. Whazzizname actually has a place on the net.kooks hall of shame
as a result of those, and his subsequent, actions.

RonB wrote:
> Oh Great! Here we go again.
> The last time someone tried to start a wreck alternative it turned into a
> world-wide range war.
> Hang on!

Yup, but think back, it's the SAME people again.

Dave in Fairfax
--
reply-to doesn't work
use: daveldr at att dot net
American Association of Woodturners
http://www.woodturner.org
Capital Area Woodturners
http://www.capwoodturners.org/
PATINA
http://www.patinatools.org

gregg wrote:
> I was thinking along similar lines.
> How could the new group have any impact on this group? As far as I'm
> concerned, I'll extend my best wishes for success in her endeavor and
> drop in on both groups to contribute and/or learn.
> Whatever happened to 'live and let live'?

You definitely need to DAGS on her name as well as Vito Kuhn. Their
interest is in splitting the rec, not joining. They tried having their
own group formed and lost due to fraud in the voting process. If you
read some of their posts, you'll detect the holier than thou odor. Oh
hell, DAGS and all will be made clear.

Dave in Fairfax
--
reply-to doesn't work
use: daveldr at att dot net
American Association of Woodturners
http://www.woodturner.org
Capital Area Woodturners
http://www.capwoodturners.org/
PATINA
http://www.patinatools.org

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:28:14 -0700, Bob Officer
<[email protected]> got double secret probation because:

>On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking, Andy Dingley
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon" <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Could you also announce to the new group that this group exists also?
>>
>>Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the crossposts will
>>be coming from.
>
>that's alt.usenet.kooks
>
>>I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but I don't think
>>I'd like the torrent of foul language it will be. And it will be.
>
>No fooling...

Why do the lyrics to the Ramones - We're a Happy Family come to mind:

"We're A Happy Family"

We're a happy family
We're a happy family
We're a happy family
Me mom and daddy

Sitting here in Queens
Eating refried beans
We're in all the magazines
Gulpin' down thorazine

We ain't got no friends
Our troubles never end
No Christmas cards to send
Daddy likes men

Daddy's telling lies
Baby's eating flies
Mommy's on pills
Baby's got the chills

I'm friends with the President
I'm friends with the Pope
We're all making a fortune
Selling Daddy's dope


--

I see you're playing stupid again, looks like you are winning

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick Stone©"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>X-No-Archive: YES
>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>[email protected]
>
>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>> group exists also?
>>>
>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>
>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>
>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>> will be. And it will be.
>>
>> No fooling...
>
>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks, yet?

Good Day to you Chad...

Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said Supernews had
it set up.

I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer them.

Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...

Do you ever work your wood in the morning?

--
Ak'toh'di

In article <[email protected]>, "foggytown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Well I think a family-oriented and moderated woodworking group is a
>marvellous idea. I would never let anyone under the age of 21 read
>this NG with all of its sexual references thinly disguised as
>"woodworking" talk. We all know what a "dado" really is, especially
>you lesbians. And just try and convince me that "mortice and tenon"
>isn't a shameless code for filthy procreation. And the very thought of
>what a butt joint or half lap might be makes me shudder. I don't think
>I need descend any further on this subject.

Yep, not to mention the notorious tongue-n-groove joint...

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.

PJR, <[email protected]>, the foppish, pea-green penile wart, and
door keeper, nonsensically wrote:

> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick
>>>> Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>> Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>
>>>>> Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks,
>>>>> yet?
>>>>
>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>
>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said
>>>> Supernews had it set up.
>>>>
>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to
>>>> answer them.
>>>>
>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>>>
>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>
>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
>>> new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
>>> hardness of the wood.
>>
>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>
> That's easy fir yew to say.

Eh. Test post from Fred coming your way, PJ.

X-No-Archive: YES
PJR has offered into testimony
[email protected]

> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in
> alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in
>>> fam.woodworking:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking,
>>>> "Chadwick Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>> Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in
>>>>>> rec.woodworking, Andy Dingley
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where
>>>>>>> all the crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's
>>>>>>> called, but I don't think I'd like the torrent of
>>>>>>> foul language it will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>
>>>>> Have any of the major service providers created
>>>>> fam.usenet.kooks, yet?
>>>>
>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>
>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews?
>>>> 'Ratz said Supernews had it set up.
>>>>
>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for
>>>> Frito to answer them.
>>>>
>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on
>>>> topic...
>>>>
>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>
>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in
>>> this excellent new group. However, the answer to your
>>> question might depend on the hardness of the wood.
>>
>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>
> That's easy fir yew to say.

Don't pine for a new froup!

--

Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208
ChadwickStone at Gmail dot com
Usenet's most helpful netizen
Hammer of Thor, March 2005

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:01:34 MDT, in rec.woodworking, "Fred"
<"fred"@comp.os.linux.advocacy.pussy> wrote:

>PJR, <[email protected]>, whose name means "likes to autograph bed
>pans; devious and sly, not to be trusted", emitted:
>
>> That's easy fir yew to say.
>
>Why do you say that's easy for me to say, PJR?
>
>> PJR [IDIOTICON].
>
>*CHUCKS UP BREAKFAST*

Why would you chuck up breakfast. are you going to turn the toast? Are the
biscuits so hard you have to use a biscuit cutter?
>
>Would you mind using those [IDIOTICON]s /before/ I've eaten, please?

Heh!


--
Ak'toh'di

"bridger" wrote in
>
> Susan Welchel wrote:
>> This is an announcement.
>>
>> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
>> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
>> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry
>> the
>> fam.* hierarchy.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> --
>> Susan Welchel
>> Administration Team for fam.* news hierarchy
>> http://www.family-usenet.com
>
> cool. I've been a little shy about using words like fuck on
> rec.woodworking because my friends hang around here. but now I don't
> have to be so reserved... I'm happy to hear your news that there's a
> newsgroup just for using the word fuck in a woodworking context. thank
> you so much, susan...
>

Well, if you limit your knowledge sources to only folks who talk nice, you
don't learn very much.

Which seems to be part of Susan's merry band of usenet censors agenda.

So, in effect, this is an attempt to "dumb down" woodworking discusions.

Susan Welchel wrote:
> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry the
> fam.* hierarchy.
>
> Thank you.


Thank you but no. I prefer to socialize with adults.



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN

[email protected]

Oh Great! Here we go again.

The last time someone tried to start a wreck alternative it turned into a
world-wide range war.

Hang on!

RonB

X-No-Archive: YES
Bob Officer has offered into testimony
[email protected]

> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking,
> "Chadwick Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> X-No-Archive: YES
>> Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>> [email protected]
>>
>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>
>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all
>>>> the crossposts will be coming from.
>>>
>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>
>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called,
>>>> but I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul
>>>> language it will be. And it will be.
>>>
>>> No fooling...
>>
>> Have any of the major service providers created
>> fam.usenet.kooks, yet?
>
> Good Day to you Chad...
>
> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz
> said Supernews had it set up.
>
> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for
> Frito to answer them.
>
> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>
> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?

Only when the wife won't work it for me ;)

--

Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208
ChadwickStone at Gmail dot com
Usenet's most helpful netizen
Hammer of Thor, March 2005

smallfoot wrote:
> In article <1122042065.0c346415003fdb45db447cc819ae83e6@bubbanews>,
> [email protected] says...
>
>>This is an announcement.
>>
>>There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
>>friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
>>please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry the
>>fam.* hierarchy.
>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>--
>>Susan Welchel
>>Administration Team for fam.* news hierarchy
>>http://www.family-usenet.com
>
>
> Get a load of that charter. It's a goddamn nanny newsgroup. Worse yet,
> Susie and Vito are the nannies.

Will they permit discussion of projects other than liturgical
furnishing, crosses, altars and the like?

Never had a dog in the Vito Kuhn/UsenetKook fight but reading the posts
dumped on us here at the wreck I think I'd rather check the sharpness of
my saw blades with my tongue than sign on with either side of that group.

On Fri 22 Jul 2005 10:31:01a, Susan Welchel <susanwelchel@family-
usenet.com> wrote in news:1122042065.0c346415003fdb45db447cc819ae83e6
@bubbanews:

> Susan Welchel
> Administration Team for fam.* news hierarchy
> http://www.family-usenet.com
>


Guess I'll have to have a chat with my news server. Can't seem to find
anything at all with the fam. prefix, even after loading new groups and
getting a brand new complete listing.

Drat. And me here with a family and everything. 'Course, the kid's all
grown up and moved away and all we got now is a couple cats and a dog, but
still. Now I can't do any family woodworking.

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Could you also announce to the new group that this group exists also?

Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the crossposts will
be coming from.

I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but I don't think
I'd like the torrent of foul language it will be. And it will be.

Could you also announce to the new group that this group exists also?


"Susan Welchel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1122042065.0c346415003fdb45db447cc819ae83e6@bubbanews...
> This is an announcement.
>
> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry
> the
> fam.* hierarchy.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Susan Welchel
> Administration Team for fam.* news hierarchy
> http://www.family-usenet.com

"Lee Michaels" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Susan Welchel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:1122042065.0c346415003fdb45db447cc819ae83e6@bubbanews...
>> This is an announcement.
>>
>> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
>> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
>> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry
>> the
>> fam.* hierarchy.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> --
>> Susan Welchel
>> Administration Team for fam.* news hierarchy
>> http://www.family-usenet.com
>
>
> Why do I feel all creepy when I read this? Who are these super net nanny
> folks who think we need an alternative to the wreck? Must be too much
> intelligence and real discussion to suit them.
>
> And this all ages-family crap?? How does this apply to woodworking? Am I
> suppose to show my three year old neice how to play with table saws and
> routers? Talking about power tools with small children?? This sound far
> more dangerous than any moronic line of logic these folks could muster up.
>

Oooow. He said "crap". I'm taking my circular saw-wielding two-year-old
over to the new family-friendly newsgroup.

"Chadwick Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote in news:O2EEe.602359
[email protected]:

> X-No-Archive: YES
> Bob Officer has offered into testimony
> [email protected]
>
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking,
>> "Chadwick Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> X-No-Archive: YES
>>> Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all
>>>>> the crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>
>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called,
>>>>> but I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul
>>>>> language it will be. And it will be.
>>>>
>>>> No fooling...
>>>
>>> Have any of the major service providers created
>>> fam.usenet.kooks, yet?
>>
>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>
>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz
>> said Supernews had it set up.
>>
>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for
>> Frito to answer them.
>>
>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>
>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>
> Only when the wife won't work it for me ;)
>

I wish someone wood let me know if I wood be allowed to poast in the wood
group. I wood rilly, rilly, rilly appreciate it, yes I wood.

Is it OK to discuss Woody Woodpecker and the need for a sealer coat to
avoid splinters during mating season?

I wood also like to know if Frito's head is on topic in the wood group.

If you wood let me know, pleace?

--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in
dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych.
Winner of the 8/2000 & 2/2003 HL&S award. Hail Petitmorte!
Colonel of the Fanatic Legion. FL# 555-PLNTY Motto: ABUNDANCE!.
Charter Member - Digital Brownshirts and Library Gestapo.
"I have defined it 100 times and lost my account at AOL for doing so"
and "I have lost no accounts for spamming." - Edmo trying to have it
both ways.

PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:
>
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick
>> Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>[email protected]
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>
>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>>
>>>> No fooling...
>>>
>>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks,
>>>yet?
>>
>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>
>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said
>> Supernews had it set up.
>>
>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer
>> them.
>>
>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>
>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>
> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
> new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
> hardness of the wood.

Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.

--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in
dfw.*, alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych.
Winner of the 8/2000 & 2/2003 HL&S award. Hail Petitmorte!
Colonel of the Fanatic Legion. FL# 555-PLNTY Motto: ABUNDANCE!.
Charter Member - Digital Brownshirts and Library Gestapo.
"Now go refund every single previous client's money because you
obviously fuck up every time you practice astrology." Alan Williams
evaluates Raytard Murphy's skill as an astrologer.

On that fabled day of 25 Jul 2005, Chadwick Stone blessed Usenet with
hir wisdom in <[email protected]>:
> PJR has offered into testimony
> [email protected]
>
>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in
>> alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in
>>>> fam.woodworking:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>> "Chadwick Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>>> Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in
>>>>>>> rec.woodworking, Andy Dingley
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where
>>>>>>>> all the crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's
>>>>>>>> called, but I don't think I'd like the torrent of
>>>>>>>> foul language it will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have any of the major service providers created
>>>>>> fam.usenet.kooks, yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>>
>>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews?
>>>>> 'Ratz said Supernews had it set up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for
>>>>> Frito to answer them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on
>>>>> topic...
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>>
>>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in
>>>> this excellent new group. However, the answer to your
>>>> question might depend on the hardness of the wood.
>>>
>>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>>
>> That's easy fir yew to say.
>
> Don't pine for a new froup!
I'm just glad someone is finally going to spruce up teh Usernet!

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:20:49 -0400, in rec.woodworking, smallfoot
<[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] says...
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:31:01 -0400, Susan Welchel wrote:
>>
>> > This is an announcement.
>> >
>> > There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new,
>> > family- friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in
>> > this group, please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask
>> > them to carry the fam.* hierarchy.
>>
>> My sweet, lovable Suzie-Q;
>>
>> Can you please reconsile the following statements from the fam.woodworking
>> charter (currently posted at http://charters.family-usenet.com):
>>
>> "The purpose of the unmoderated newsgroup fam.woodworking"...
>>
>> and
>>
>> "Administrators of the fam.* hierarchy reserve the right to cancel any
>> post to any group in the fam.* hierarchy if they feel that the post does
>> not adhere to these guidelines."
>
>There's a word for that. It's called retromoderation.

Do a search on Russ Albury's comments on Retromoderation. on Various NANA*
groups.

I thought however that is called a "contradiction", one of the more obscure
"Fallacies in Logic"

>> Please, please don't tell me that you've setup a stealth moderated group!
>> Because you wouldn't lie to us, right? I'm certain that you'll give us a
>> complete and satisfactory explanation about fam.woodworking's moderation
>> status. Because, as a Christian, I know that you wouldn't want to mislead
>> anyone.
>
>Liars or dumbasses? It's a matter of opinion, really.

or POV...

So with this new hierarchy, it is really a matter of WFtKTAMJWD*.

*(What Frito the Kuhnt thinks a mythical jesus would do.)


--
Ak'toh'di

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking, Andy Dingley
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>Could you also announce to the new group that this group exists also?
>
>Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the crossposts will
>be coming from.

that's alt.usenet.kooks

>I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but I don't think
>I'd like the torrent of foul language it will be. And it will be.

No fooling...


--
Ak'toh'di

X-No-Archive: YES
Israel Regardie has offered into testimony
[email protected]

> On that fabled day of 25 Jul 2005, Chadwick Stone blessed
> Usenet with hir wisdom in
> <[email protected]>:
>> PJR has offered into testimony
>> [email protected]
>>
>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in
>>> alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>
>>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in
>>>>> fam.woodworking:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>>> "Chadwick Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>>>> Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in
>>>>>>>> rec.woodworking, Andy Dingley
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that
>>>>>>>>>> this group exists also?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where
>>>>>>>>> all the crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's
>>>>>>>>> called, but I don't think I'd like the torrent of
>>>>>>>>> foul language it will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have any of the major service providers created
>>>>>>> fam.usenet.kooks, yet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews?
>>>>>> 'Ratz said Supernews had it set up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for
>>>>>> Frito to answer them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on
>>>>>> topic...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in
>>>>> this excellent new group. However, the answer to your
>>>>> question might depend on the hardness of the wood.
>>>>
>>>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>>>
>>> That's easy fir yew to say.
>>
>> Don't pine for a new froup!
>
> I'm just glad someone is finally going to spruce up teh
> Usernet!

Teh best finish comes from going against the grain!

--

Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208
ChadwickStone at Gmail dot com
Usenet's most helpful netizen
Hammer of Thor, March 2005

> Why all the hostitility to this announcement? Is there some history
> here that I don't know about? If there's an audience for a moderated
> group, it will make it, otherwise, it will fail.
>
If this is the same group that tried it about a year ago they are not
friendly - they can be vicious. Several of occasional Wreck'ers fell victim
to having counterfeited flaming, vulgar and insulting posts and emails sent
to other members in their names. My wife and grandkids got to read some of
this crap. That campaign probably caused some of the more casual Wreck
posters to drop out.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:31:01 -0400, Susan Welchel wrote:
>
> > This is an announcement.
> >
> > There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new,
> > family- friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in
> > this group, please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask
> > them to carry the fam.* hierarchy.
>
> My sweet, lovable Suzie-Q;
>
> Can you please reconsile the following statements from the fam.woodworking
> charter (currently posted at http://charters.family-usenet.com):
>
> "The purpose of the unmoderated newsgroup fam.woodworking"...
>
> and
>
> "Administrators of the fam.* hierarchy reserve the right to cancel any
> post to any group in the fam.* hierarchy if they feel that the post does
> not adhere to these guidelines."

There's a word for that. It's called retromoderation.

> Please, please don't tell me that you've setup a stealth moderated group!
> Because you wouldn't lie to us, right? I'm certain that you'll give us a
> complete and satisfactory explanation about fam.woodworking's moderation
> status. Because, as a Christian, I know that you wouldn't want to mislead
> anyone.

Liars or dumbasses? It's a matter of opinion, really.

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, "Chadwick Stone©"
<[email protected]> got double secret probation because:

>X-No-Archive: YES
>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>[email protected]
>
>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>> group exists also?
>>>
>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>
>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>
>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>> will be. And it will be.
>>
>> No fooling...
>
>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks, yet?

That would be fam.*

--

I see you're playing stupid again, looks like you are winning

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:55:20 -0700, Bob Officer
<[email protected]> got double secret probation because:

>On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick Stone©"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>[email protected]
>>
>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>
>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>
>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>
>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>
>>> No fooling...
>>
>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks, yet?
>
>Good Day to you Chad...
>
>Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said Supernews had
>it set up.
>
>I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer them.
>
>Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>
>Do you ever work your wood in the morning?

Sometimes, although I allow my GF all the opportunity I can provide to
work my wood. Even in the shop she can work my wood.

--

I see you're playing stupid again, looks like you are winning

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:12:19 GMT, gregg <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 22 Jul 2005 11:57:37 -0700, "bf" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>Why all the hostitility to this announcement? Is there some history
>>here that I don't know about? If there's an audience for a moderated
>>group, it will make it, otherwise, it will fail.
>>
>I was thinking along similar lines.
>How could the new group have any impact on this group? As far as I'm
>concerned, I'll extend my best wishes for success in her endeavor and
>drop in on both groups to contribute and/or learn.
>Whatever happened to 'live and let live'?

They could make a million of them, and it would be fine- except for
the fact that there is an announcement every couple of months or so
from this twit and her buddy Vito reminding us all that the Wreck is a
filthy cesspool of naughty words and terrible vices. My experience
has been otherwise- very few groups related to any subjects I have any
interest in are nearly as clean or high-minded as this one, so I don't
take kindly to her raving. YMMV.

On 22 Jul 2005 11:57:37 -0700, "bf" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Why all the hostitility to this announcement? Is there some history
>here that I don't know about? If there's an audience for a moderated
>group, it will make it, otherwise, it will fail.
>
I was thinking along similar lines.
How could the new group have any impact on this group? As far as I'm
concerned, I'll extend my best wishes for success in her endeavor and
drop in on both groups to contribute and/or learn.
Whatever happened to 'live and let live'?

gregg

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:02:01 GMT, in rec.woodworking, Dave in Fairfax
<[email protected]> wrote:

>RonB wrote:
>> Oh Great! Here we go again.
>> The last time someone tried to start a wreck alternative it turned into a
>> world-wide range war.
>> Hang on!
>
>Yup, but think back, it's the SAME people again.

That's right...

Lord, save me from people that work in what they think is your name.

Have Delete key,
Will travel
--
Ak'toh'di

Susan Welchel wrote:
If you're interested in this group,
> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry the
> fam.* hierarchy.

I'm sure they would get right on that.

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:31:01 -0400, Susan Welchel wrote:

> This is an announcement.
>
> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry
> the fam.* hierarchy.

My dearest, darlingest Suzie-Q;

I am distraught (distraught!) that my current news provider does not
yet carry the fam.* hierarchy. Can you please provide a list of the
providers who are carrying fam.*? Is there a web to news gateway for fam.*
yet? Is Google on board?

Please, please let me know how to access this bountiful feast of
knowledge! I grow faint, my head spins, and my hands tremble at the
thought of being denied this fabulous resource.

--
XOXOXO,
Joe Wells

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:31:01 -0400, Susan Welchel wrote:

> This is an announcement.
>
> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new,
> family- friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in
> this group, please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask
> them to carry the fam.* hierarchy.

My sweet, lovable Suzie-Q;

Can you please reconsile the following statements from the fam.woodworking
charter (currently posted at http://charters.family-usenet.com):

"The purpose of the unmoderated newsgroup fam.woodworking"...

and

"Administrators of the fam.* hierarchy reserve the right to cancel any
post to any group in the fam.* hierarchy if they feel that the post does
not adhere to these guidelines."

Please, please don't tell me that you've setup a stealth moderated group!
Because you wouldn't lie to us, right? I'm certain that you'll give us a
complete and satisfactory explanation about fam.woodworking's moderation
status. Because, as a Christian, I know that you wouldn't want to mislead
anyone.

--
Thanks in advance for clearing this up,
XOXOXOXO
-Joe Wells

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:51:12 -0600, Art Deco wrote:

> PJR <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick
>>>>> Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>>>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>>>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>>>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>>
>>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said
>>>>> Supernews had it set up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer
>>>>> them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>>
>>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
>>>> new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
>>>> hardness of the wood.
>>>
>>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>>
>>That's easy fir yew to say.
>
> Oak this, swine.

And now something completely different: THE LARK!


--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <[email protected]>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions:
"The jews roots are islamic."

in Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history:
"WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."

in Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science:
"Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral' triangle."

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:59:34 +0100, PJR wrote:

> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Dr. Flonkenstein wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:51:12 -0600, Art Deco wrote:
>>
>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>
>>>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick
>>>>>>> Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>>>>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>>>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>>>>>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>>>>>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>>>>>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>>yet?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said
>>>>>>> Supernews had it set up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
>>>>>> new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
>>>>>> hardness of the wood.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>>>>
>>>>That's easy fir yew to say.
>>>
>>> Oak this, swine.
>>
>> And now something completely different: THE LARK!
>
> Parts of Vito's body, number one: The Pointy Head
>
Parts of Vito's body, numero duo: The Brai-- oops, I'm sorry.


> PJR :-)

--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <[email protected]>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions:
"The jews roots are islamic."

in Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history:
"WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."

in Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science:
"Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral' triangle."

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:24:57 +0100, PJR wrote:

> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Dr. Flonkenstein wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:59:34 +0100, PJR wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Dr. Flonkenstein wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:51:12 -0600, Art Deco wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick
>>>>>>>>> Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>>>>>>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>>>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>>>>>>>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>>>>>>>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>>>>yet?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said
>>>>>>>>> Supernews had it set up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer
>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
>>>>>>>> new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
>>>>>>>> hardness of the wood.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's easy fir yew to say.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oak this, swine.
>>>>
>>>> And now something completely different: THE LARK!
>>>
>>> Parts of Vito's body, number one: The Pointy Head
>>>
>> Parts of Vito's body, numero duo: The Brai-- oops, I'm sorry.
>
> Why are you sorry about mentioning his Braised Liver?
>
> PJR :-)

I was only referring to his braind... err.. ok.


--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <[email protected]>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions:
"The jews roots are islamic."

in Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history:
"WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."

in Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science:
"Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral' triangle."

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:31:01 -0400, Susan Welchel
<[email protected]> wrote:

>This is an announcement.
>
>There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
>friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
>please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry the
>fam.* hierarchy.
>
>Thank you.

Fine. Then go there, and stay there.

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:55:36 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Well, if you limit your knowledge sources to only folks who talk nice, you
>don't learn very much.

Limiting it to the minimal propagation of a bogus new top level
hierarchy is even more limiting. You can of course create any usenet
group or hierarchy you want, but if you don't play by the big boys'
rules, then it won't propagate past your own server.

On Sunday 24 July 2005, Chadwick Stone© wrote in fam.woodworking:

> X-No-Archive: YES
> Bob Officer has offered into testimony
> [email protected]
>
>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>> group exists also?
>>>
>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>
>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>
>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>> will be. And it will be.
>>
>> No fooling...
>
> Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks, yet?

Duplicates fam.admin.announce.

PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]

On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:

> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick Stone©"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>[email protected]
>>
>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>
>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>
>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>
>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>
>>> No fooling...
>>
>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks, yet?
>
> Good Day to you Chad...
>
> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said Supernews had
> it set up.
>
> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer them.
>
> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>
> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?

It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
hardness of the wood.

HTH.

PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]

On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:

> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:
>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick
>>> Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>
>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>>>
>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>
>>>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks,
>>>>yet?
>>>
>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>
>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said
>>> Supernews had it set up.
>>>
>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer
>>> them.
>>>
>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>>
>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>
>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
>> new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
>> hardness of the wood.
>
> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.

That's easy fir yew to say.


PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]

On Sunday 24 July 2005, Fred wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:

> PJR, <[email protected]>, whose name means "likes to autograph bed
> pans; devious and sly, not to be trusted", emitted:
>
>> That's easy fir yew to say.
>
> Why do you say that's easy for me to say, PJR?
>
>> PJR [IDIOTICON].
>
> *CHUCKS UP BREAKFAST*
>
> Would you mind using those [IDIOTICON]s /before/ I've eaten, please?

Did you have any wood to discuss, abuser?

<snecks fam.woodworking>

<waits to see what happens>

PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]

On Sunday 24 July 2005, Fred wrote in fam.woodworking:

> PJR, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Did you have any wood to discuss, abuser?
>
> I like to talk to people.

That's good, Fred. Are you capable of talking to people about
woodworking in a manner that would not offend a kindergarten child?

>> <snecks fam.woodworking> <waits to see what happens> PJR [IDIOTICON].
>
> That [IDIOTICON] looks good on you, though not as good as a doberman.

I don't think fam.pets has been created yet. Perhaps you ought to
request it.

PJR :-)
"Arjftebhcf: erp.jbbqjbexvat,snz.jbbqjbexvat,nyg.hfrarg.xbbxf,nyg.shpxabmmyrf"
- *qvat*!
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]

On Sunday 24 July 2005, Dr. Flonkenstein wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:

> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:51:12 -0600, Art Deco wrote:
>
>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>
>>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick
>>>>>> Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>>>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>>>>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>>>>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>>>>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>yet?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said
>>>>>> Supernews had it set up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
>>>>> new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
>>>>> hardness of the wood.
>>>>
>>>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>>>
>>>That's easy fir yew to say.
>>
>> Oak this, swine.
>
> And now something completely different: THE LARK!

Parts of Vito's body, number one: The Pointy Head

PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]

On Sunday 24 July 2005, Dr. Flonkenstein wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:

> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:59:34 +0100, PJR wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Dr. Flonkenstein wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:51:12 -0600, Art Deco wrote:
>>>
>>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sunday 24 July 2005, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>
>>>>>> PJR <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday 24 July 2005, Bob Officer wrote in fam.woodworking:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:36:45 GMT, in rec.woodworking, "Chadwick
>>>>>>>> Stone©" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>X-No-Archive: YES
>>>>>>>>>Bob Officer has offered into testimony
>>>>>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:05:04 +0100, in rec.woodworking,
>>>>>>>>>> Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:55:37 GMT, "Leon"
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you also announce to the new group that this
>>>>>>>>>>>> group exists also?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't forget alt.kooks too, because that's where all the
>>>>>>>>>>> crossposts will be coming from.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> that's alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to read fam.circle or whatever it's called, but
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think I'd like the torrent of foul language it
>>>>>>>>>>> will be. And it will be.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No fooling...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Have any of the major service providers created fam.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>>>>>yet?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Good Day to you Chad...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Google has the group set up and I think Octonews? 'Ratz said
>>>>>>>> Supernews had it set up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wrote a series of questions... and I am waiting for Frito to answer
>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just to start things off right and keep this on topic...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you ever work your wood in the morning?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's good to see so many fine on-topic discussions in this excellent
>>>>>>> new group. However, the answer to your question might depend on the
>>>>>>> hardness of the wood.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stop making an ash out of yourself, if you wood.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's easy fir yew to say.
>>>>
>>>> Oak this, swine.
>>>
>>> And now something completely different: THE LARK!
>>
>> Parts of Vito's body, number one: The Pointy Head
>>
> Parts of Vito's body, numero duo: The Brai-- oops, I'm sorry.

Why are you sorry about mentioning his Braised Liver?


PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:20:49 -0400, in rec.woodworking, smallfoot
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> >[email protected] says...
> >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:31:01 -0400, Susan Welchel wrote:
> >>
> >> > This is an announcement.
> >> >
> >> > There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new,
> >> > family- friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in
> >> > this group, please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask
> >> > them to carry the fam.* hierarchy.
> >>
> >> My sweet, lovable Suzie-Q;
> >>
> >> Can you please reconsile the following statements from the fam.woodworking
> >> charter (currently posted at http://charters.family-usenet.com):
> >>
> >> "The purpose of the unmoderated newsgroup fam.woodworking"...
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> "Administrators of the fam.* hierarchy reserve the right to cancel any
> >> post to any group in the fam.* hierarchy if they feel that the post does
> >> not adhere to these guidelines."
> >
> >There's a word for that. It's called retromoderation.
>
> Do a search on Russ Albury's comments on Retromoderation. on Various NANA*
> groups.

/unplugs sarcasm meter

Let me guess: He oozed praise for the concept, and then went on to
compose an eloquent plea for news admins worldwide to embrace it and use
it as much as possible?

> I thought however that is called a "contradiction", one of the more obscure
> "Fallacies in Logic"

It could also be called a "waste of time" since some servers ignore
cancel messages, for the very reason that some people (like teh Frito)
abuse them by trying to censor the net.

> >> Please, please don't tell me that you've setup a stealth moderated group!
> >> Because you wouldn't lie to us, right? I'm certain that you'll give us a
> >> complete and satisfactory explanation about fam.woodworking's moderation
> >> status. Because, as a Christian, I know that you wouldn't want to mislead
> >> anyone.
> >
> >Liars or dumbasses? It's a matter of opinion, really.
>
> or POV...
>
> So with this new hierarchy, it is really a matter of WFtKTAMJWD*.
>
> *(What Frito the Kuhnt thinks a mythical jesus would do.)

WWAGOFD (What Would A Grumpy Old Frito Do)

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:19:05 -0400, in rec.woodworking, smallfoot
<[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] says...
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:20:49 -0400, in rec.woodworking, smallfoot
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>,
>> >[email protected] says...
>> >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:31:01 -0400, Susan Welchel wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > This is an announcement.
>> >> >
>> >> > There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new,
>> >> > family- friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in
>> >> > this group, please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask
>> >> > them to carry the fam.* hierarchy.
>> >>
>> >> My sweet, lovable Suzie-Q;
>> >>
>> >> Can you please reconsile the following statements from the fam.woodworking
>> >> charter (currently posted at http://charters.family-usenet.com):
>> >>
>> >> "The purpose of the unmoderated newsgroup fam.woodworking"...
>> >>
>> >> and
>> >>
>> >> "Administrators of the fam.* hierarchy reserve the right to cancel any
>> >> post to any group in the fam.* hierarchy if they feel that the post does
>> >> not adhere to these guidelines."
>> >
>> >There's a word for that. It's called retromoderation.
>>
>> Do a search on Russ Albury's comments on Retromoderation. on Various NANA*
>> groups.
>
>/unplugs sarcasm meter
>
>Let me guess: He oozed praise for the concept, and then went on to
>compose an eloquent plea for news admins worldwide to embrace it and use
>it as much as possible?

try to guess better. he rejected it 100%.

>> I thought however that is called a "contradiction", one of the more obscure
>> "Fallacies in Logic"
>
>It could also be called a "waste of time" since some servers ignore
>cancel messages, for the very reason that some people (like teh Frito)
>abuse them by trying to censor the net.

It is a wonderful world isn't it... :)

>> >> Please, please don't tell me that you've setup a stealth moderated group!
>> >> Because you wouldn't lie to us, right? I'm certain that you'll give us a
>> >> complete and satisfactory explanation about fam.woodworking's moderation
>> >> status. Because, as a Christian, I know that you wouldn't want to mislead
>> >> anyone.
>> >
>> >Liars or dumbasses? It's a matter of opinion, really.
>>
>> or POV...
>>
>> So with this new hierarchy, it is really a matter of WFtKTAMJWD*.
>>
>> *(What Frito the Kuhnt thinks a mythical jesus would do.)
>
>WWAGOFD (What Would A Grumpy Old Frito Do)

you got that right...


--
Ak'toh'di

"Susan Welchel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1122042065.0c346415003fdb45db447cc819ae83e6@bubbanews...
> This is an announcement.
>
> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry
> the
> fam.* hierarchy.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Susan Welchel
> Administration Team for fam.* news hierarchy
> http://www.family-usenet.com


Why do I feel all creepy when I read this? Who are these super net nanny
folks who think we need an alternative to the wreck? Must be too much
intelligence and real discussion to suit them.

And this all ages-family crap?? How does this apply to woodworking? Am I
suppose to show my three year old neice how to play with table saws and
routers? Talking about power tools with small children?? This sound far
more dangerous than any moronic line of logic these folks could muster up.

Susan Welchel wrote:

> This is an announcement.
>
> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry the
> fam.* hierarchy.
>
> Thank you.
>
announcement: No.

Dave

In article <1122042065.0c346415003fdb45db447cc819ae83e6@bubbanews>,
[email protected] says...
> This is an announcement.
>
> There is a new woodworking newsgroup: fam.woodworking in the new, family-
> friendly fam.* usenet news hierarchy. If you're interested in this group,
> please email a request to your usenet administrator and ask them to carry the
> fam.* hierarchy.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Susan Welchel
> Administration Team for fam.* news hierarchy
> http://www.family-usenet.com

Get a load of that charter. It's a goddamn nanny newsgroup. Worse yet,
Susie and Vito are the nannies.

/shudder