BB

"Bill"

14/03/2010 3:21 AM

Re: Design for my garage shop


Please excuse my top-posting here. I just wanted to mention that I went
back and reread all of the responses I recieved to my post to the current
thread a month ago and I am actively trying to incorporate some of the
suggestions that were made into my shop design. I'm even learning a bit
about electricity...who would have guessed that a 240v line is powered by
two 120v lines! : )

I've got a 240v line on the outside of the brick garage (previously used by
an RV owner). I'd like to flip the line around for use on the inside and
put 120v instead on the outside. I'm confident about the former, the
latter I'll do if the outlet fixture sizes are compatible enough. Haven't
done my homework on that yet as the idea just occurred to me a few days ago.

I will surely need to take down the wallboard on the uninsulated wall on one
side of the garage for the sake of the electrical improvements. The side
which has our kitchen on the other side surely has insulation, other
electric, plumbing?,etc., behind it. I am less enthused about "messing"
with that wall. I'll have to give that more thought.

My current interior 220v outlet is currently pretty close to the floor.
Does the electrical "code" cite a minimum for that?

BTW, I currently have 3 36" neon lamps..I think I'm going to have 6. Plugs
in the ceiling would be convenient..

Thanks for listening,
Bill


Bill wrote:
> At my site linked to below is a almost-to-scale model (pdf and
> SketchUp) of the 20' by 20' garage
> shop I am trying to assemble, as viewed from the omitted garage door.

> Ignore the water purification system in the corner ; )
> The workbench design and tools are mostly accurate only to size.
> The BS has a mobile base (not shown), the TS will get one too.

> Besides for the 240V outlet on the one wall, there is 120V outlet on
> each wall (I think
> I should check and see whether they are wired on one circuit).


You need more outlets. The more the better but at least 3 per wall IMO - I
hate cords strung everywhere. At least two circuits, more better.

The TS in the center is good but you need power for it. As I said, I hate
cords strung everywhere so the outlet for my TS is in the ceiling. There
are both 240v and 120v. Yes, a cord hangs down but at least it isn't always
getting stepped on.

Be sure you have at least eight feet in front of and behind the TS.

You'll undoubtedly be adding bench top tools which implies more benches.
When I build same I incorporate electrical outlets into them so that other
tools or adjacent benches will have conveniently placed outlets.

You need an area to store stuff...sheet goods, lumber, work in progress,
etc.

--

dadiOH


This topic has 210 replies

kk

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 1:56 PM

On Mar 16, 3:35=A0pm, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>
>
> > I'm not going to get into a pissing contest over a c'bkr that costs
> > less than $10, but dedicating a 2P-30 c'bkr for each 240V load not
> > only simplifies the installation but also allows you to isolate a
> > problem load without affecting other loads.
>
> ...
> > Lew
>
> When the idea of adding an additional (flip) switch to each 240v circuit
> was suggested that was one of my concerns--that it was something else to
> go wrong, which would in turn would make it harder to isolate a problem.
>
> I've got an inexpensive voltimeter which has worked fine for working
> with 12v in the car, but I'm not sure whether it would be prudent to
> plug it into a 240v outlet. =A0I won't say I'm skeered, but I was thinkin=
g
> about using it with gloves! : ) =A0I sure believe I should test any
> outlet before I plug a new $1000 tool into it.

A 240V circuit is simply two 120V circuits on opposite sides of the
transformer. Nothing is further than 120V from ground.

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 4:38 PM

On 3/16/2010 4:19 PM, Bill wrote:
> Swingman wrote:

>> Don't know about your voltmeter, but ones that can be used for testing
>> all voltages are very inexpensive and handy to have it you're going to
>> be doing your own electrical work.
>
> Thanks, that's what I wanted to hear. I'm going to have to learn to use
> mine "better" before I plug it into high voltage...

Only 120v use, but I carry one of these in the toolkit in my truck at
all times ... and in my pocket during electrical inspections in houses
I'm building. Mostly to insure that circuits are live and wired
correctly, but also to verify to an inspector that a circuit is indeed
GFCI protected (you don't always know where the GFCI receptacle upstream
is located)

http://www.tripplite.com/EN/products/model.cfm?txtmodelID=3941

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 8:12 AM

Bill wrote:

>
> Some of what I've learned since I read Lew's post the first time:
>
> Evidentally, a load center is "Main Lug Only" when it doesn't have
> it's own main breaker like the primary load center would probably
> have.
> Load Units, such as made by Eator Cutler-Hammer use descriptions such
> as "12 spaces, 24 circuits".
> If I learned part of my lesson yesterday, the only way you'd get 24
> circuits would be to use 1 Hot
> and a 1 Common for every circuit.

In 120v circuits you would always use one Hot and one Neutral, plus a ground
for every circuit, so if what you are trying to say is that you can only get
24 circuits by wiring only for 120v, then you would be correct. You get 24
branch circuits by using mini breakers instead of full size breakers.
Mini's will give you two breakers in the space of one. Each half of a mini
gets wired the same way as a full sized breaker - a hot wire to the breaker
and the neutral and ground to the respective buss bar(s).

> Is it typical for someone put two
> such circuits under a single breaker--probably
> not in a shop environment, huh? Even "lighting" seem too important
> to mess around with.

A branch circuit is the outlets/devices that are controlled by a breaker.
That circuit can run to multiple outlets, multiple devices, or it can be
dedicated to just one outlet or device. With that in mind, you don't want
to run multiple branch circuits off of one breaker. You calculate the load
that a given circuit will potentially exhibit to the breaker, and determine
how many outlets/devices to string off that breaker. Lighting is fairly
straight forward since you pretty much know the load of every light - you
know the wattage of the lights you'll be using. Outlets are less straight
forward because the many types of things one may plug into an outlet make
for an undefined load. People generally stick with some common techniques
such as 8 outlets (or less depending on preference) per branch circuit in a
shop type environment. There's no real science behind that though.

>
> So you use 2 spaces for a 2P-30A branch For Each 240v stationary tool
> in the load center. So with four 240v tools
> one is basically left with room for 4 or 8 120v lines.

Correct.

> This
> raises the question: Which is better--two circuits with 1 outlet each
> from 1 breaker or one circuit with 2 outlets on one breaker?

It is best to think about how you will be using the area. It really serves
no purpose to install dedicated outlets all around your shop. It's not
likely that you will be using tools simultaneously such that you need 20A at
each outlet. You'd be better off wiring branch circuits of 4-8 outlets per
circuit. However - you cannot run multiple branch circuits from one
breaker. So - think about your expected usage and then wire in branch
circuits accordingly. My guess is you'll find that wiring 4-8 outlets per
branch circuit works out just fine.

> I
> think the former--for the same reason Lew only wants one 240v tool on
> each line. This creates a new question for me: in what sense does a
> 15A breaker support two different circuits? Specifically, does
> it only support the sum of the amperages of the two circuits?

It does not.


--

-Mike-
[email protected]

kk

in reply to "Mike Marlow" on 16/03/2010 8:12 AM

17/03/2010 6:14 AM

On Mar 17, 8:03=A0am, Larry Jaques <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:06:36 -0400, the infamous "Bill"
> <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>
>
>
> >"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> It is not that different from what can happen with a table saw. You ne=
ver
> >> take your eyes off of it and be very safety conscious. I should also p=
oint
> >> out that getting zapped with the 220 voltage is a much bigger shock an=
d
> >> more serious than the regular 110 volts. DAMHIKT. So do exercise due
> >> caution when working with the higher voltages.
>
> >No wonder I'm a GALOOT... =A0: )
>
> I don't have the energy for that any more. =A0I've become a
> Normanderthal, but I won't give up my ryoba or azebiki or my
> Satanleys.
>
> RE: the subject, I -prefer- getting zapped or zinged by 240. It has
> enough voltage to throw you off it if need be. When you touch 240, you
> KNOW you've been zapped, bygolly. =A0BTW, none of my zaps has been more
> than a few milliseconds, and usually through nitrile gloves when
> working on a hot circuit. I haven't done any 240V arc welding since
> that little power sypply testing incident in Engineering, when I blew
> the 50A circuit with my screwdriver. That's one blinding flash, lemme
> tell ya. No, I wasn't blushing, it was sunburn. That's my story and
> I'm stickin' to it.
>
> --
> No matter how cynical you are, it is impossible to keep up.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --Lily Tomlin

Unless you're *really* clever, there is no difference between a zap
off 240V and 120V (in the US). It takes work to get across both
"hots" in a 240V circuit. Don't do that!

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to "Mike Marlow" on 16/03/2010 8:12 AM

17/03/2010 6:03 AM

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:06:36 -0400, the infamous "Bill"
<[email protected]> scrawled the following:

>
>"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*nadaspam*@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> It is not that different from what can happen with a table saw. You never
>> take your eyes off of it and be very safety conscious. I should also point
>> out that getting zapped with the 220 voltage is a much bigger shock and
>> more serious than the regular 110 volts. DAMHIKT. So do exercise due
>> caution when working with the higher voltages.
>
>No wonder I'm a GALOOT... : )

I don't have the energy for that any more. I've become a
Normanderthal, but I won't give up my ryoba or azebiki or my
Satanleys.

RE: the subject, I -prefer- getting zapped or zinged by 240. It has
enough voltage to throw you off it if need be. When you touch 240, you
KNOW you've been zapped, bygolly. BTW, none of my zaps has been more
than a few milliseconds, and usually through nitrile gloves when
working on a hot circuit. I haven't done any 240V arc welding since
that little power sypply testing incident in Engineering, when I blew
the 50A circuit with my screwdriver. That's one blinding flash, lemme
tell ya. No, I wasn't blushing, it was sunburn. That's my story and
I'm stickin' to it.

--
No matter how cynical you are, it is impossible to keep up.
--Lily Tomlin

DI

"Dave In Texas"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 11:30 AM



"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> There is one gotcha to watch for when using a 220 c'bkr in a load center
> which, by design, can be used with both full size and mini breakers:
>
> When using these load centers it is possible to insert the full size
> 220/240v c'bkr into two adjacent slots that are both fed by one hot leg
> ... the result being that you will get no voltage to the tool whatsoever.
>
> Nothing dangerous will result, but you'll be left scratching your head. :)
>
> Basically, just be careful when you install a 220/240v c'bkr that you put
> it in two adjacent slots where each draws from a different bus. You can do
> this visually.

And, I've got three-phase! Which I've never been able to utilize . . .
except once - by stupidity.
12 or 15 years ago I finally got around to putting in a dedicated
circuit for my kitchen refrigerator. Only I plugged that 20 amp single pole
into one leg of the three phase. WOW! You can't believe how bright a 15
watt appliance bulb can get. The freezer fan was the only casualty.
Fortunately I had an appliance repair man that made Sunday house calls.
And, that side-by-side Kenmore lasted 20+ years.

Dave in Houston

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 5:15 AM

Bill wrote:

>
> Another tip I learned while reading was to shut off all of the circuit
> breakers, before shutting off the main one, before adding a new one.
> Like Swingman says, this stuff makes sense, you just need someone to
> tell you what makes sense.

Don't know where you learned that one Bill, but it's not right. There is no
need to shut off all of the branch breakers before shutting of the main and
there is no need to shut off the main before inserting a new breaker.


--

-Mike-
[email protected]

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

18/03/2010 12:15 PM

On 3/18/2010 11:57 AM, Bill wrote:
> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>
>> Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
>> a 2P-30A, non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool.
>
> I just wished to double-check that this was supposed to be
> "Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
> non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool."
>
> This is correct, right? Is is fair to assume that most 15A tools also
> have a fuse or internal shut-off system of their own?

IME, don't even bother with 15 amp circuits, except maybe for lights.

In many locales today at least 12 ga wire is required throughout, and it
is simply too easy to use 12 ga and go with 20 amp c'brks for your 120v
tools.

Not really enough of a cost savings for the ultimate flexibility benefit.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

23/03/2010 8:30 AM


"Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> I'm updatiing my description. It's dark outside and drizzling. Both
> meters are moving.
>
>
>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
>> is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter--no
>> more than a 3/8" gap betweeen them.
> A much longer piece of conduit (3/4"-1") comes out of the bottom of the
> side of the box and goes up into the back of the "transformer".

A meter pole would often have a disconnect connected to the meter, at the
pole. This was/is common in trailer hookups. I'm not sure about the (15A)
statement you make. What do you mean by (15A)? It strkes me as odd that
that there would be a 15 Amp disconnect directly off a meter. The conduit
going back to the transformer could just have a ground running in it.

>
> I think it's possible that my shut off in inside that 2'x2'x2.5' box I
> mentioned earlier, it's unlocked and would be easily reachable with a
> ladder. Another conceivable place is inside my meter's box--which has a
> special clip on it.

Unless you have a disconnect installed after your meter, you have no
disconnect. Disconnects are common for meter poles, and but they are not
necessary for a standard residential hookup. Your disconnect (in normal
circumstances) is the main breaker in your panel. The meter head serves as
the disconnect for most home wiring.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

kk

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 7:58 AM

On Mar 15, 9:30=A0am, dpb <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bill wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Is there a rule that says a subpanel has to be a very short distance fr=
om
> > the main panel? =A0I would position it about 10 feet away if I could.
>
> That's cool...
>
> > Is anything (code) likely to prevent me from doing what I want with 15A=
and
> > 20A 120v and 240v circuits from a subpanel (like having 10 of them)? =
=A0As you
> > mentioned earlier, I'm likely to stay far below the 50A threshold
> > in terms of actual usage.
>
> No, that's what subpanels are for -- just size it for the number of
> circuits of the type you want/need and make it's service breaker the
> same or smaller than the feed. =A0If it's close enough, you can (I think)
> get by w/o the local breaker/disconnect but it's certainly more
> convenient and I'd likely not scrimp...

If they're in different locations I believe you're required to have a
local disconnect. This can easily be accomplished by inserting a
breaker, rated for the wire between the sub and main panels, into the
panel and feeding it "backwards" (the electrons don't know the
difference). This breaker should be marked clearly as the disconnect.

> Good luck, it ain't rocket science; most of the Code is simply
> formalizing what is common sense; it just takes somebody to point out
> what that commonsense is for the first time and NEC is the standard.
> The self-help books are pretty good in general at separating the code
> legalese and turning that into what actually needs doing...

Yup.

Hg

Hoosierpopi

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 1:00 PM

1. Never enough outlets.

a) Try running 12/3 or to all you outlets, isolating the top from
the bottom and adding a switch to the bottom outlets if not to top and
bottom. This will allow you to leave those wall transformers plugged
in 24/7, but turn off power to them when you leave the shop.

b) Duplex outlets in the ceiling can serve ideally for the four
foot fluorescent "shop lamps" sold at Lowes, HD, etc for about $9. And
you can do the switched approach on these as well in case you have a
need for a DROP CORD approach to a tool - assuming your shop would not
be usable with the lights off e.g. nto enough window area to let in
sufficient daylight for working.

2. The wall on the house side might prove a treasure trove of points
to secure power, telephone line, cable TV, water, sewer access. Is the
floor of the shop even with that of the house/kitchen? Hey, how about
a shop sink/eyewash station replete with drain?

LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 10:55 PM


"Nonny" wrote:

> When I wired my own shop, I pulled in a 60a line to a load center in
> my shop from my main household breaker box. I then got a 6-circuit
> little load center box and connected it up without much thought.
> The box had 3 breakouts on the left and 3 breakouts on the right.
> It was only when I began installing some tools that it hit me like a
> ton of rocks: that's just 2 normal DP breakers and 2 SP breakers.
> In my own case, it was a simple task to pull out the little box and
> substitute in a 12 circuit box with 6 knockouts on each side. The
> little box became a load center on one of the attics.
-----------------------------------------

Lowest cost, highest flexibility as follows:

125A MLO (Main Lug Only) 12/24 (12-1" poles/24;1/2" poles)
Load Center equipped with a 2P-60A Main c'bkr kit, neutral bar,
and insulated ground bar.

The above has enough capacity for almost any shop including
a fairly good sized commercial shop.

Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
a 2P-30A, non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool.

If you are going to work on a tool, padlock the disconnect switch
in the OFF position with a padlock that has only ONE KEY,
which is in your pocket.

The above is a standard industrial safety practice.

Simple, neat, and low cost.

Lew



LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 12:04 PM


"Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote
On Mar 15, 11:25 am, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/15/2010 12:57 AM, Bill wrote:
>
> > Here is a relavant DIY-type link I found, in case anyone else is
> > interested:
>
> >http://www.hammerzone.com/archives/elect/panel/sub_panel/01/new.htm
>
> Do what Lew said ...
>
> I REPEAT: Do what Lew said!!
>
> If you do what Lew said you will have no problems installing a sub-panel
> of the right kind that will be flexible and codeworthy (you haven't got
> into the issue of "grounding" a sub-panel yet, and, depending upon the
> location, you will most likely need to address grounding with an
> "insulated ground bar" which generally has to be purchased separately
> from the breaker box and installed therein).
>
> Save yourself some time, money, and redoing, by paying particular
> attention to what Lew said!
>
> Got the point yet?
>
> If not, get it ... by doing what Lew said! :)
>
> --www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 10/22/08
> KarlC@ (the obvious)

I think he should do what Lew said to do.
==================

Does that include the installation of the epoxy workstation?


LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 11:55 AM


"Swingman" wrote:


> There is one gotcha to watch for when using a 220 c'bkr in a load
> center which, by design, can be used with both full size and mini
> breakers:
>
> When using these load centers it is possible to insert the full size
> 220/240v c'bkr into two adjacent slots that are both fed by one hot
> leg ... the result being that you will get no voltage to the tool
> whatsoever.
<snip>
-----------------------------------------

Only if you try to cut corners.

A 2P c'bkr has a built in key that prohibits installing the c'bkr in
an improper location.

OTOH, if you try to cut corners by installing a pair of 1P c'bkrs with
a handle tie, it is definitely possible to incorrectly install the
c'bkrs and get only 120V.

Another problem is that you lose the common internal trip feature
found in a proper 2P c'bkr.

I'm not going to get into a pissing contest over a c'bkr that costs
less than $10, but dedicating a 2P-30 c'bkr for each 240V load not
only simplifies the installation but also allows you to isolate a
problem load without affecting other loads.

A definite safety and flexibility advantage for minimal cost.

Lew


Ns

"Nonny"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 7:00 PM


"Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...

Just a tiny, little, FWIW.

One time, a long time ago in a past life, old Nonny stuck in a
breaker for some little load in his shop. The panel was a 36
circuit 200a one. Somewhere, along the way, one of the wires from
a 30a circuit to a water heater snuck over into a corner of the
box and came up alongside the tabs where the front screwed to the
box.

Poor old Nonny was sticking the front cover back in place when the
sheet metal screw he was using (note: ALL flat ended screws
furnished with panels disappear/get lost/are taken/break etc.)
drove straight into the 10g. wire on the 30a breaker. The bang
and fireball were worth note, and from that moment on, old Nonny
made damned sure that no wires snuck up under panel face mounting
tabs ever again.

--
Nonny
When we talk to God, we're praying,
but when God talks to us,
we're schizophrenic.
What's the deal?


LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 6:42 PM


"Bill" wrote
>
> When the idea of adding an additional (flip) switch to each 240v circuit
> was suggested that was one of my concerns--that it was something else to
> go wrong, which would in turn would make it harder to isolate a problem.
>
If you understand the layout and how to use a a multimeter, finding the
problem is pretty straightforward.

> I've got an inexpensive voltimeter which has worked fine for working with
> 12v in the car, but I'm not sure whether it would be prudent to plug it
> into a 240v outlet. I won't say I'm skeered, but I was thinking about
> using it with gloves! : ) I sure believe I should test any
> outlet before I plug a new $1000 tool into it.
>
Again, get an inexpensive multimeter. They are worth their weight in gold.
They have settings for 110 and 220 volts.

When I moved into my present house, an idiot friend of the previous owner
assured me the dryer outlet was OK. It wasn't wired up when we first looked
at it. I told my wife I was going to check it out, but she did not think it
was important. She started the dryer and quickly became alarmed. I don't
really recall exactly what happened but my honey assured me that the bad
outlet was doing something mean to her dryer and she wanted it fixed RIGHT
NOW!

I checked it out with my multimeter and referenced an electrical book I had.
Sure enough, it was wired incorrectly. They just stuck the wires in there
in a random order. I corrected that problem by measuring across the various
wires until I found the right combination. Then I wired the outlet
appropriately. The dryer worked fine.

But it didn't stop there. The facuets to the washer leaked. So I had to
replace them. I found the best quality faucets out there and put them in.
They have worked fine since. I don't know where they found those junk
faucets that was on there before.

Cuz when you move into a new house, the missus wants her things fixed first.




LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 4:41 PM


"Swingman" wrote:

> Not necessarily with all brands ... I'm looking at a box of NEW GE
> 2p's from HD that will fit in any two slots in a 12/24 panel.
>
> Absolutely no doubt about it ...
----------------------------------
Go back and check those GE c'bkrs again.

If they fit, they have made a MAJOR design since I was involved with
them.

Makes no difference whether they are 2P full size or 2P half size
c'bkr modules, they both have a common internal trip and a mechanical
interlock to prevent insertion into an incorrect location.

BTW, should see the words "common internal trip" molded into the case
of a 2P device.

Lew



LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 5:24 PM

Should have included the statement the GE c'bkrs can not be installed
incorrectly in GE load centers.

Can't swear as to whether the interlock works with non GE manufactured
load centers.

Lew
-----------------------------------------
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Swingman" wrote:
>
>> Not necessarily with all brands ... I'm looking at a box of NEW GE
>> 2p's from HD that will fit in any two slots in a 12/24 panel.
>>
>> Absolutely no doubt about it ...
> ----------------------------------
> Go back and check those GE c'bkrs again.
>
> If they fit, they have made a MAJOR design since I was involved with
> them.
>
> Makes no difference whether they are 2P full size or 2P half size
> c'bkr modules, they both have a common internal trip and a
> mechanical interlock to prevent insertion into an incorrect
> location.
>
> BTW, should see the words "common internal trip" molded into the
> case of a 2P device.
>
> Lew
>
>
>
>


LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 10:25 PM


"Bill" <[email protected]> wrote
>
> I have a Radio Shack "8-Range Multitester " (bought new in 1979) : AC/DC
> Voltage .... 15V, 150V, 1000V
> This is the same thing you are talking about, right?
>
There are better ones out there, but for home handyman use, that will do
just fine. I went to electronics school long time ago and used the old
vacuum tube models. Those things were heavy and hot. But digital
electronics have made these things available to everybody for a modest cost.


LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 11:45 PM


"Bill" wrote
>
> Meter question: Understanding this will ease my concerns about my tester.
> How come one can hook it up to two hot 120 lines (240v) and NOT generate
> a meltdown in the unit? Big resisters? BTW, I have read some of the
> "one hand
> in the back pocket" sort of safety suggestions.
>
You apparently have a 1000 volt tester. It has the internal circuitry to
handle the load as long as it is set for the proper voltage. The important
thing is to just touch what you need tested with the test leads. You don't
use your fingers or other parts of your anatomy. You use the test device in
exactly the way it was intended to be used.

One old techie trick is to place one lead on one wire (or whatever) and
slowly move the other lead in very deliberately. This is to make sure you
don't touch anything other than the lead to the wires. Remember, people
don't get zapped from using the equipment properly. It usually happens when
they brush up against something while being a little too casual with how
they move their hands.

It is not that different from what can happen with a table saw. You never
take your eyes off of it and be very safety conscious. I should also point
out that getting zapped with the 220 voltage is a much bigger shock and more
serious than the regular 110 volts. DAMHIKT. So do exercise due caution when
working with the higher voltages.

But you are not going to get shocked by using the test equipment peoperly.
It is when you subsitute body parts for the test leads is when you get into
trouble. And have some kind of reference material handy so you know what the
voltage needs to be from one point to another. It it all tests out OK, your
machines will be happy.


LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 9:25 PM


"Swingman" wrote:

> My shop has a GE panel, not sure about the other two.
>
> Doing remodels I've had to chase down compatible c'bkr too many
> times to know that all of them are not created equal and aren't
> interchangeable from panel to panel for the most part ... how long
> has it been since you've been "involved with them"?
-----------------------------------------
End of '82.

The GECPDD (G E Circuit Protective Devices Department) made a big deal
out of the fact that their c'bkrs COULD NOT be incorrectly installed
in their load centers.

Molded case circuit breakers are a very mature business.

Even plug-in GFI c'bkrs have been around since the '70s

About the only product additions or improvements have been an increase
in interrupt ratings for the resi market.

If you take a look at a 2P GE Bkr, you should see about a 3/32 dia pin
that runs between the two cases.

You should be able to see it in the crack between the cases.

It is the mechanical interlock to prevent incorrect installation.

Just for grins, if you get a chance, open up your shop panel and see
if you can move a 2P device ONE space up or down and see if you can
install it.

Nother option.

Next time you buy a GE load center, try to incorrectly install a 2P
c'bkr while it is still on the bench before installation on the job.

Lew



LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

17/03/2010 5:10 AM

"Swingman" wrote:
>
> Of course you can, Lew ... that's what I've been saying the whole
> time.
>
> Took less than 10 seconds to find this "trouble shooting" tale for
> the EXACT problem I was warning Bill to watch out for with some
> panels that take half height c'brks:
------------------------------------------
Went back and did a little homework on the GE.com site.

Molded case, thermal/magnetic, plug in c'bkrs are still using the same
catalog number nomenclature they were for at least the last 40 years
as follows:
=======================
THQP*##

H = 10,000A interrupt capacity
P = 1/2" module
* = Number of poles (1,2 or 3)
## = Amp rating
=======================
THQL*##

H = 10,000A interrupt capacity
L = 1" module
* = Number of poles (1,2 or 3)
## = Amp rating
=======================
The catalog numbering system for Load Centers is also the same as it
was 40 years ago.

You couldn't incorrectly install a GE c'bkr in a GE load center back
then and the fact the that same catalog numbers are still being used
today tells me nothing has changed.

If there was a change, there would be new catalog numbers.

This has been an old wife's tale for as far back as I can remember,
but you simply can not incorrectly a GE c'bkr in a GE load center.

BTW, it's been 28 years since I've looked at this stuff, not 18, but
hey, time flies when you are having fun.<G>

Lew


LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

20/03/2010 4:21 PM

Bill wrote:

> thought Lew suggested separate circuits (though
> he never actually said that). That's not the reason, huh?
---------------------------------------

Standardization and simplicity.

Buy 500 ft spools of #10AWG, 105C insulation wire in Red, Black, White
& Green.

Use 3/4 PVC conduit.

Use 2P-30A, full size c'bkrs for each fixed 240V load (T/S, D/C,
Compressor, etc.)

Run individual 120V circuits using 1P-20A half size c'bkrs and #10AWG
wire to 2 gang, extra deep wall boxes wired with two (2) industrial,
back wired duplex receptacles.

Locate 2 gang boxes every 10-20 ft along wall, at 48" elevation.

Dedicate at least three (3), 1P-20A circuits for lighting.

Finally, buy a 10-2 with ground, 25 ft long molded cord set, chop off
the receptacle end and rewire with an extra deep, 2 gang box wired
with a pair of receptacles.

It becomes your "go to" extension cord.

NOTES:

Purpose of running #10AWG wire on 20A circuits for this job is
ECONOMY.

Standardizing on one size wire, then buying full spools of wire is
less costly than buying cut lengths of wire.

Running 3/4 conduit makes wire pulling a lot easier than using 1/2
conduit.

Using PVC conduit eliminates the need for buying a conduit bender and
learning how to use it.

If job was big enough to justify buying full spools of #10AWG &
#12AWG, then by all means do it, but this job isn't big enough.

Lew


LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 9:42 PM


"Mike Marlow" wrote:
> Bill - I am not trying to be insulting, but I am getting
> increasingly concerned. I have to ask you (and I hope you will
> think about this question...), how can you possibly work smart when
> you don't even know what "may be" your electrical shut off? You
> really need more knowledge before you move forward. Spend the
> money - bring in an electrician, and learn from him while he works.
<snip>
--------------------------------------
Now you have truly hit what is driving this discussion, MONEY, or more
definitively, Bill's unwillingness to spend it.

Lew



LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/04/2010 9:59 PM


"Bill" wrote:
> I read that it's better to use 15A circuits for lighting since the
> wire in lighting fixtures is comparatively fine, such wiring may get
> screwed up by the time the C'Breaker switches off.
-----------------------------------------
You read too much.

By NEC definition, the c'bkr protects the distribution system, the
load device be damned.

You are only interested in protecting the insulation on the #12AWG
wire feeding the fixture, not the bloody fixture.

-----------------------------------------------
> I also read one shouldn't buy the cheapest flourescent lighting
> fixtures one can find as they tend to have cheap ballasters.
----------------------------------------
You usually get what you pay for.

These days fixtures with T-5 lamps are a pretty good value.

----------------------------------------

> Is this what you mean?
>
> http://www.globalindustrial.com/p/electrical/race-ways/metal-raceways/raceway-2g-bx-xdeep-hbl500-hbl750-iv?utm_source=biz_shop&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=B218418&utm_campaign=Metal-Raceways-biz_shop&infoParam.campaignId=WZ
-------------------------------------------
No that's not a two gang box.

Take a trip down to your local big box store electrical section and
take a look at the Raco products on display.

I'm sure you will find an extra deep, 2 gang, duplex box in inventory
along with a matching cover plate for two duplex receptacles.

It will solve a lot of problems a whole lot faster than screwing
around on the web.

Lew



Rc

Robatoy

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 9:00 AM

On Mar 15, 11:25=A0am, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/15/2010 12:57 AM, Bill wrote:
>
> > Here is a relavant DIY-type link I found, in case anyone else is intere=
sted:
>
> >http://www.hammerzone.com/archives/elect/panel/sub_panel/01/new.htm
>
> Do what Lew said ...
>
> I REPEAT: Do what Lew said!!
>
> If you do what Lew said you will have no problems installing a sub-panel
> of the right kind that will be flexible and codeworthy (you haven't got
> into the issue of "grounding" a sub-panel yet, and, depending upon the
> location, you will most likely need to address grounding with an
> "insulated ground bar" which generally has to be purchased separately
> from the breaker box and installed therein).
>
> Save yourself some time, money, and redoing, by paying particular
> attention to what Lew said!
>
> Got the point yet?
>
> If not, get it ... by doing what Lew said! =A0:)
>
> --www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 10/22/08
> KarlC@ (the obvious)

I think he should do what Lew said to do.

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 8:34 AM

Bill wrote:

>
> I'm equivalently excited about the electrical as I would be a new
> woodworking project.
> I came home with my subpanel feeling like it was Christmas--for only
> $29.99)! I told my
> wife I would not have been as excited about a $250 Solid-State-Drive
> (for the computer).
> So, with all due respect, there's something deeper than the greenback
> at stake here.
> It's more about control. Learning the skill to install switches,
> lights and and plugs everywhere and anywhere
> in the house I want. It feels good! Similarly, I bought a bunch of
> drywall tools--so I can practice in the garage and do
> nice paint and drywall work throughout my home. I think a lot is
> about the accomplishment that comes from doing something myself.
> Similarly, I'm interested in
> landscaping my yard--it's a canvas. The idea of paying someone else
> to do "my art" is completely unthinkable. When I mount several
> outlets and light panels on my shop ceiling it will be done in a
> more perfect than I could pay anyone to do, as no one cares about it
> more than I do. Maybe I do all this out of love. I'm Vawey
> passionate! : )

That's the perfect reason for learning to do things for yourself. I agree
with your motivation completely Bill. That said, somethings require more
knowledge, going into them than other things. Electrical work is one of
those. It's not black magic and it's not something you couldn't learn, but
it does bring more serious consequences when you do something wrong than a
bad cut in a piece of wood does.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

23/03/2010 11:02 AM

On 3/23/2010 10:04 AM, Bill wrote:

> Those of you who have been following this thread may find another true
> story amusing: About 2 dozen years back when I worked on Fort Sill, OK
> (home of the "Field Artillery School"),

Small world ... I'm a graduate of "Comanche County Canon Cockers
College" myself. Took AIT there, and graduated from Field Artillery
Officer Candidate School after that.

I liked OK ... except for the 3.2 beer, and the cowgirls who could whip
your butt in a game of 8 ball and holler "next!".

:)

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 1:57 PM

dpb wrote:

>
> Rural areas may well have had more than one service drop at the same
> farmstead -- we have two here; one for the well/farm buildings, the
> other serves the house.
>

Yeah - I had not thought about that. Somehow I got it into my head that
Bill was saying he had two meters on his house service and did not think
beyond that.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]



Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 7:33 PM

On 3/16/2010 6:41 PM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
> "Swingman" wrote:
>
>> Not necessarily with all brands ... I'm looking at a box of NEW GE
>> 2p's from HD that will fit in any two slots in a 12/24 panel.
>>
>> Absolutely no doubt about it ...
> ----------------------------------
> Go back and check those GE c'bkrs again.
>
> If they fit, they have made a MAJOR design since I was involved with
> them.
>
> Makes no difference whether they are 2P full size or 2P half size
> c'bkr modules, they both have a common internal trip and a mechanical
> interlock to prevent insertion into an incorrect location.
>
> BTW, should see the words "common internal trip" molded into the case
> of a 2P device.

I'm not at the shop right now but I already know that I'm absolutely
certain about this ... did it personally when I installed the sub-panel
in the old shop; and have had it happen two other times in new houses in
contractor installed panels; there is no doubt whatsoever about that.

My shop has a GE panel, not sure about the other two.

Doing remodels I've had to chase down compatible c'bkr too many times to
know that all of them are not created equal and aren't interchangeable
from panel to panel for the most part ... how long has it been since
you've been "involved with them"?

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

kk

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

17/03/2010 6:01 AM

On Mar 16, 5:42=A0pm, "Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*[email protected]>
wrote:
> "Bill" wrote
>
> > When the idea of adding an additional (flip) switch to each 240v circui=
t
> > was suggested that was one of my concerns--that it was something else t=
o
> > go wrong, which would in turn would make it harder to isolate a problem=
.
>
> If you understand the layout and how to use a a multimeter, finding the
> problem is pretty straightforward.
>
> > I've got an inexpensive voltimeter which has worked fine for working wi=
th
> > 12v in the car, but I'm not sure whether it would be prudent to plug it
> > into a 240v outlet. =A0I won't say I'm skeered, but I was thinking abou=
t
> > using it with gloves! : ) =A0I sure believe I should test any
> > outlet before I plug a new $1000 tool into it.
>
> Again, get an inexpensive multimeter. =A0They are worth their weight in g=
old.
> They have settings for 110 =A0and 220 volts.
>
> When I moved into my present house, an idiot friend of the previous owner
> assured me the dryer outlet was OK. It wasn't wired up when we first look=
ed
> at it. I told my wife I was going to check it out, but she did not think =
it
> was important. She started the dryer and quickly became alarmed. I don't
> really recall exactly what happened but my honey assured me that the bad
> outlet was doing something mean to her dryer and she wanted it fixed RIGH=
T
> NOW!
>
> I checked it out with my multimeter and referenced an electrical book I h=
ad.
> Sure enough, it was wired incorrectly. =A0They just stuck the wires in th=
ere
> in a random order. I corrected that problem by measuring across the vario=
us
> wires until I found the right combination. Then I wired the outlet
> appropriately. The dryer worked fine.

Many years ago, my MIL was complaining about getting zapped off the
dryer. Thinking I was smart (an EE student, at the time) I grounded
the case of the dryer to the cold water pipe. That took out a 60A
fuse. Oh, my! I took the dryer apart, then the wall outlet. All was
fine there, but the entrance panel had the red and white wires
swapped. They had been living in the house for six months with the
case of the dryer sitting at 120V! The dryer was running off the
other 120V leg. After, she said that things were drying a *lot*
faster.

> But it didn't stop there. =A0The facuets to the washer leaked. So I had t=
o
> replace them. =A0I found the best quality faucets out there and put them =
in.
> They have worked fine since. I don't know where they found those junk
> faucets that was on there before.

Contractor specials, no doubt. The same place they found the $.39
outlets.

> Cuz when you move into a new house, the missus wants her things fixed fir=
st.

Yup. We bought a new house. I don't know why I thought things would
be different.

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

18/03/2010 3:58 PM

On 3/18/2010 1:04 PM, Bill wrote:

> BTW, the IM for the 15A saw I was looking at suggests putting the saw on
> a 20A circuit.

That'll work.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

17/03/2010 6:26 AM

On 3/16/2010 11:25 PM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
> "Swingman" wrote:

> Just for grins, if you get a chance, open up your shop panel and see
> if you can move a 2P device ONE space up or down and see if you can
> install it.

Of course you can, Lew ... that's what I've been saying the whole time.

Took less than 10 seconds to find this "trouble shooting" tale for the
EXACT problem I was warning Bill to watch out for with some panels that
take half height c'brks:

http://tinyurl.com/ykq5vz6

Things have changed in 18 years ... not all for the good.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 11:23 PM

Bill wrote:

>
> Good story. My wife asked me why I spend so much time as I do
> mentioning all of the types of accidents that can occur in a shop. I
> explained that I'm trying to teach myself to avoid them. I think
> the main key strategy is not to be in a rush.
>

Not to be in a rush is a component of a good strategy. As is, learning from
someone who can show you what to do. The internet has a limited usefulness
in that area, when it comes to learning from scratch. A good strategy is to
go to someone who knows, and will tell you what you need to learn, and not
to rely on your own two cents to make that determination.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

DF

Delbert Freeman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 8:32 AM


Not having seen your shop, I don't see why you would have any problems.
You are right about the 240v being, essentially, two 120v lines. Unlike
120V, which has a Hot, Common and Ground, the 240 has (or can run on) 2
Hot and a Ground/Common. ( But then so can/does 120V. If you are old
enough, you remember when all plugs only had two prongs.) While your
"could" split a 120V line off your 240V, I would not do it. You
mentioned you had 120V inside the shop, just run it to your current 240V
box (having run the 240v line, of course). You can do this by merely
tying another length of Romex cable to your existing outlet and running
it to the outside box, replacing the 240v socket, which you have already
moved inside, and weatherproof cover plate with ones for a 120v socket
and "bingo!"

As for your lighting - the more the better, I would definitely upgrade to
6, or maybe even 8 4' fixtures.

You mentioned "Code." That depends on where your live. Here in Alabama,
such mods are very common WITHOUT an inspection. However, for those of
you who live in more governmentally restrictive and union influenced
states, check with your local woodworkers for their advice. (Going to
the local government will invariably give you a "YES" answer, whereas
your woodworking buddies will tell you the truth. ;-) )

For what its worth.

Deb



On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:21:15 -0400, Bill wrote:

> Please excuse my top-posting here. I just wanted to mention that I went
> back and reread all of the responses I recieved to my post to the
> current thread a month ago and I am actively trying to incorporate some
> of the suggestions that were made into my shop design. I'm even
> learning a bit about electricity...who would have guessed that a 240v
> line is powered by two 120v lines! : )
>
> I've got a 240v line on the outside of the brick garage (previously used
> by an RV owner). I'd like to flip the line around for use on the inside
> and put 120v instead on the outside. I'm confident about the former,
> the latter I'll do if the outlet fixture sizes are compatible enough.
> Haven't done my homework on that yet as the idea just occurred to me a
> few days ago.
>
> I will surely need to take down the wallboard on the uninsulated wall on
> one side of the garage for the sake of the electrical improvements. The
> side which has our kitchen on the other side surely has insulation,
> other electric, plumbing?,etc., behind it. I am less enthused about
> "messing" with that wall. I'll have to give that more thought.
>
> My current interior 220v outlet is currently pretty close to the floor.
> Does the electrical "code" cite a minimum for that?
>
> BTW, I currently have 3 36" neon lamps..I think I'm going to have 6.
> Plugs in the ceiling would be convenient..
>
> Thanks for listening,
> Bill
>
>
> Bill wrote:
>> At my site linked to below is a almost-to-scale model (pdf and
>> SketchUp) of the 20' by 20' garage
>> shop I am trying to assemble, as viewed from the omitted garage door.
>
>> Ignore the water purification system in the corner ; ) The workbench
>> design and tools are mostly accurate only to size. The BS has a mobile
>> base (not shown), the TS will get one too.
>
>> Besides for the 240V outlet on the one wall, there is 120V outlet on
>> each wall (I think
>> I should check and see whether they are wired on one circuit).
>
>
> You need more outlets. The more the better but at least 3 per wall IMO
> - I hate cords strung everywhere. At least two circuits, more better.
>
> The TS in the center is good but you need power for it. As I said, I
> hate cords strung everywhere so the outlet for my TS is in the ceiling.
> There are both 240v and 120v. Yes, a cord hangs down but at least it
> isn't always getting stepped on.
>
> Be sure you have at least eight feet in front of and behind the TS.
>
> You'll undoubtedly be adding bench top tools which implies more benches.
> When I build same I incorporate electrical outlets into them so that
> other tools or adjacent benches will have conveniently placed outlets.
>
> You need an area to store stuff...sheet goods, lumber, work in progress,
> etc.

BB

Bill

in reply to Delbert Freeman on 14/03/2010 8:32 AM

19/03/2010 11:01 AM

Mike M wrote:

> The main thing in running your circuits at this point is to get good
> wiring in the walls. As was stated don't run less then #12. If in
> doubt for the future run a 12-3 or 10-3 wire set up and cap the unused
> wire. In the future if you need to have 240 at a outlet you have the
> extra wire. Depending on your construction its wise to install some
> conduit, flex or smurf tube to be able to pull additional circuits,
> cable or phone lines. If you have an accessible attic a lot of this
> can be done as risers for future use.
>
> Mike M

Mike, Thank you for some very good ideas!

I DO HAVE an accessible attic, and I believe that most, if not all, of
the wires from the main panel go right up to it. I had been debating
with myself whether to wire "through the attic" or through the studs.
One factor is that the wall I wish to add the outlets to first tops out
at the eaves. I thought that a combination would be easiest--attic to a
wall, down, and then through the studs. No NEC violations in sight,
right??? Anything to be wary of (the attic is not living space)?
Do you agree that this makes sense, even if I have to rip down a bunch
of wallboard to do it?

Bill

MM

Mike M

in reply to Delbert Freeman on 14/03/2010 8:32 AM

19/03/2010 12:13 AM




On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:19:31 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> Comes down to what are you really wiring here--a home shop or a commercial
>> business shop kinda' thing? Of course, if $$ is no concern, go for the
>> gold...
>>
>> $0.02, imo, ymmv, etc., etc., etc., ...
>>
>> -dpb
>
>You did a pretty job assessing my situation earlier--it was kind of you to
>go out of your
>way to write that the OP probably wasn't setting up shop for a commerical
>business.
>Borrowing a title from Hemmingway, I am after "A Clean Well-Lighted Place",
>and a place
>where I can build some of the things I would like to build. Paraphrasing
>something Lew
>wrote, "a place with a captain's seat" (too). I actually have one of those,
>but it is surrounded
>by books and there is no room for sawdust there.
>
>I spent 20 minutes walking meditatively around my "Untidy Mildy-Lit Place"
>this evening
>with a measuring tape. I noted, sort of proud of my new knowledge, that I
>could see
>someone had moved an overhead light to 37" in front of the main panel--it
>had evidentally been in the
>space described (roughtly) in the NEC as "that space, 36" outward from the
>main panel,
>30 inches wide, open to the ceiling and to the floor that must remain free
>space".
>I noted violations of this policy that were not found during our house's
>inspection.
>It won't matter now though because lots of stuff is coming down--kitchen
>cupboards (that look hideous),
>all the wall board on at least one wall--the matter of a few feet of wire is
>non-consequential.
>240v DC, TS, and Air Compressor, none of which I have, merit their own
>circuits. Tools on 120v circuits
>can afford to do more sharing since probably only one will be powered at a
>time.
>
>Q) ShouId I leave a few inches of the wallboard around the main panel and
>existing outlets and switches
>(which will remain live) for any reason? BTW, I imagine it will take some
>accurate measuring to
>cut wallboard to fit my panel and subpanel (and outlets, etc). I noted that
>it will requires 2 pieces to
>fit around a panel. Going this far, I might as well add insulation to this
>wall too. Concerning the wall without the
>panels, I ponder whether I need to put any wallboard back up. --I obviously
>need to get one of those
>wiring books so I don't become an "electrical-pest" around here!
>
>After my 20 minute inspection, I came in from my shop-to-be feeling a little
>wiser, a little readier, and with the
>suspicions that I'm getting read to make the biggest mess I ever made! : )
>I will have to
>to cut everything into small pieces so my refuse company will haul it away
>week by week in the usual can.
>That effort will probably more than pay for any wire I use.. : ) I'll
>decide more after I find how much it cost
>this weekend! ; )
>
>Best,
>Bill
>
The main thing in running your circuits at this point is to get good
wiring in the walls. As was stated don't run less then #12. If in
doubt for the future run a 12-3 or 10-3 wire set up and cap the unused
wire. In the future if you need to have 240 at a outlet you have the
extra wire. Depending on your construction its wise to install some
conduit, flex or smurf tube to be able to pull additional circuits,
cable or phone lines. If you have an accessible attic a lot of this
can be done as risers for future use.

Mike M

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 1:04 PM

Bill wrote:

> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the
> pole is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the
> meter. No exterior lighting in the neighborhood--it's dark. Maybe
> there's an outlet I'm not aware of. But it doesn't make sense that
> if there were, that it would be on the back pole (unless it were
> cheaper and easier than running a 40' line underground). I've
> investigate further. My neighbor may be a source of info too--it's
> his pole too.

I cannot for the life of me imagine why there would be two meters on the
same service. I'd suggest you're seeing this incorrectly.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 10:40 PM

Bill wrote:

>
> Hmm...I have one of those too. The fine print at the link says "not
> for use with Ground Fault Interrupt -GFI outlets".
> So you show an outlet is GFCI protected by checking another outlet
> downstream (I've read that a GFCI breaker
> is often put on the first outlet off a line)? So, I take it that of
> the device an outlet properly grounded, and it's not directly
> grounded, then it must have been done upstream with GFCI? GFCI is
> one of those things I need to read up on...
>

You need to run that question past again Bill - it makes no sense as
written. I'll take a stab at what I think you might be asking. Your
outlets (devices) are always "directly" grounded - even if ground fault
protected. GFCI's simply separate the neutral from the ground at the device
so they can monitor leakage. The device is however, still very much
grounded, and all downstream outlets are grounded in the usual manner, which
is to say that they are installed just like any other outlet which is not
ground fault protected.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

MH

"Martin H. Eastburn"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 10:04 PM

I have 1000' or more of 2-phase High voltage onto and dead-end into my back
wood lot. I use two transformers. I have two meters.
One mailing address. Often - nasty as it sounds - they put the house on the
shop. And call the house not paid for 30 days...

So if you have two meters at the same address - pay attention and watch out!
Fee happy types - like the banks - are invading utilities.

Martin

dpb wrote:
> FrozenNorth wrote:
>> On 3/22/10 1:04 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
>>> Bill wrote:
>>>
>>>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>>>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the
>>>> pole is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the
>>>> meter. No exterior lighting in the neighborhood--it's dark. Maybe
>>>> there's an outlet I'm not aware of. But it doesn't make sense that
>>>> if there were, that it would be on the back pole (unless it were
>>>> cheaper and easier than running a 40' line underground). I've
>>>> investigate further. My neighbor may be a source of info too--it's
>>>> his pole too.
>>>
>>> I cannot for the life of me imagine why there would be two meters on the
>>> same service. I'd suggest you're seeing this incorrectly.
>>>
>> Agreed, the two meters would never agree anyways, as the meters
>> themself will have some loss.
>
> Rural areas may well have had more than one service drop at the same
> farmstead -- we have two here; one for the well/farm buildings, the
> other serves the house.
>
> They're not the "same" service and I'm not suggesting that for Bill's
> case either. I'm simply suggesting it's possible one of those is
> possibly abandoned in place (specifically mentioned) and/or owing to
> being on an old farmstead he does still have two drops. In the later,
> they both should, indeed, show on the statements and they'll not have
> anything to do w/ each other.
>
> --

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 10:25 AM

On 3/15/2010 12:57 AM, Bill wrote:

> Here is a relavant DIY-type link I found, in case anyone else is interested:
>
> http://www.hammerzone.com/archives/elect/panel/sub_panel/01/new.htm

Do what Lew said ...

I REPEAT: Do what Lew said!!

If you do what Lew said you will have no problems installing a sub-panel
of the right kind that will be flexible and codeworthy (you haven't got
into the issue of "grounding" a sub-panel yet, and, depending upon the
location, you will most likely need to address grounding with an
"insulated ground bar" which generally has to be purchased separately
from the breaker box and installed therein).

Save yourself some time, money, and redoing, by paying particular
attention to what Lew said!

Got the point yet?

If not, get it ... by doing what Lew said! :)

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 5:00 PM

On 3/14/2010 2:34 PM, Bill wrote:
> Thank you for the lessons in electricity! I take it I should be installing
> "4-wire" outlets if I'm
> planning to purchase new 220v tools from Delta or Grizzly, correct?

Nope ... most 220/240v woodworking tools in North America only need a
total of 3 wires to both work properly and comply with code.

The three wires needed for 220/240v operation are: Two hot wires (one
from each hot leg of the service/sub panel), and one ground wire. The
ground wire, while not necessary to power the equipment, is necessary
for safety and code compliance.

The "four wire" cables/installations you mentioned are used for 220/240v
appliances (like stoves and dryers) that are also equipped with timers,
lights, etc, and that operate on 120v.

That said, there might be the ocassional woodworking tool that requires
120v also for lights and/or speed control circuits, etc ... so do your
homework before attempting to wire.

If you have one of these 4 wire circuits and don't need the extra wire,
then simply use the two hots wires, usually black and red (which
can/should be verified at the c'bkr) and the ground wire; and put a wire
nut/tape on the end of the neutral/white wire in the receptacle.

NOTE: some 220/240v circuits use "2 wire w/ground".

In this case the white, neutral, wire can be used as one of the two
necessary hot wires but it must be clearly marked on both ends, at the
c'bkr and the receptacle (generally with a wrap of black tape), so that
those coming after you know it is indeed being used as as a "hot" wire.

> I probably should examine a book (on setting up/modifying new existing
> lines). Any suggestions regarding a book? I recall seeing a few books on
> wiring at the BORGs.

Most of those are well worth the price paid for a DIY'er. Don't confuse
yourself with learning about 3 phase power unless you have a need; take
your time, understand and think about what you're doing and don't do it
until you do ... it is not a bad idea for a home/shop owner to turn off
the power to the ENTIRE structure when doing electrical work (and if you
can lock up the service panel so that only you have access while doing
the work, so much the better).

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 9:22 AM

On 3/16/2010 7:12 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
> Bill wrote:
>
>>
>> Some of what I've learned since I read Lew's post the first time:
>>
>> Evidentally, a load center is "Main Lug Only" when it doesn't have
>> it's own main breaker like the primary load center would probably
>> have.
>> Load Units, such as made by Eator Cutler-Hammer use descriptions such
>> as "12 spaces, 24 circuits".
>> If I learned part of my lesson yesterday, the only way you'd get 24
>> circuits would be to use 1 Hot
>> and a 1 Common for every circuit.
>
> In 120v circuits you would always use one Hot and one Neutral, plus a ground
> for every circuit, so if what you are trying to say is that you can only get
> 24 circuits by wiring only for 120v, then you would be correct. You get 24
> branch circuits by using mini breakers instead of full size breakers.
> Mini's will give you two breakers in the space of one. Each half of a mini
> gets wired the same way as a full sized breaker - a hot wire to the breaker
> and the neutral and ground to the respective buss bar(s).

Mike is spot on as usual.

There is one gotcha to watch for when using a 220 c'bkr in a load center
which, by design, can be used with both full size and mini breakers:

When using these load centers it is possible to insert the full size
220/240v c'bkr into two adjacent slots that are both fed by one hot leg
... the result being that you will get no voltage to the tool whatsoever.

Nothing dangerous will result, but you'll be left scratching your head. :)

Basically, just be careful when you install a 220/240v c'bkr that you
put it in two adjacent slots where each draws from a different bus. You
can do this visually.

On new houses I've even had licensed electricians do this (hopefully
accidentally) on more than one occasion. It is a PITA to be called on a
Thanksgiving morning when everything but the oven on a dual fuel stove
works. DAMHIKT

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MH

"Martin H. Eastburn"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

23/03/2010 8:40 PM

Simple. Call the power company and mention that just maybe someone
is stealing power. Can they have a guy come out and check out this funny
connection.....

Await the experts.

martin

Bill wrote:
> "Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> I'm updatiing my description. It's dark outside and drizzling. Both meters
> are moving.
>
>
>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
>> is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter--no
>> more than a 3/8" gap betweeen them.
> A much longer piece of conduit (3/4"-1") comes out of the bottom of the side
> of the box and goes up into the back of the "transformer".
>
> It's concievable that the meter is my neighbors as we both have power lines
> from the same pole, in which case maybe it's his box (but it still doesn't
> make sense that the conduit goes back up into back of the transformer).
>
> My wife, who is pretty clever, and suggested turning it off to find out what
> its for! : )
>
> I think it's possible that my shut off in inside that 2'x2'x2.5' box I
> mentioned earlier, it's unlocked and would be easily reachable with a
> ladder. Another conceivable place is inside my meter's box--which has a
> special clip on it. I'm not going tampering with either, so I have no needs
> for any warnings! : ) Maybe I'll turn the small box off sometime though,
> just to see what happens....
>
> Bill
>
>

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 12:26 PM

On 3/15/2010 11:00 AM, Robatoy wrote:

> I think he should do what Lew said to do.

Y'all go ahead and laugh, now! :)

I don't think it is apparent to the average person just how much
experience and knowledge is behind that information, particularly with
regard to the sub panel choice/type.

Trial and error on this issue can cost the neophyte beaucoup $$ ...

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sh

Steve

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 7:27 PM

"Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Bill wrote:
>
>
> Lew, I printed out your detailed directions. Thank you. I also picked
> up the 125A, MLO, 12/24 Load Center today.
> It looked good, met the description, and was only $29.99 (at Menards),
> and before I knew it I said "I'll take it!".
> I'll look at it more carefully and I'll check that everything about it
> is truly suitable. I also picked up two 3/4" NM clamp connectors
> which I believe is appropriate for #6 or #8 wiring between the main
> and subpanel and--a wiring book. Also spent a while looking at indoor
> wiring and absorbing info about all sorts of related things with the
> awe of someone really seeing them for the first time. Maybe that's
> part of new-homeowner syndrome, or maybe it's because I had an
> "Erector Set" when I grew up (anyone remember those?).
>
> When I got home I looked at the Menards circular and kicked myself for
> not picking up "Ugly's Electrical References" on the NEC, on sale for
> $7.99.
>
> It is amazing how many home projects that I can consider now with much
> less "fear and trepidation" than I would have had a little over a week
> ago! Electrical plug not on the right side of the room--no problem! :
> )
>
> Best,
> Bill
>
>

Bill,

If you get a chance I would definately recommend the "Ugly's Electrical
References" book. I have one at my desk and far and away the most usefull
reference book that I have. I do low voltage designs for a living and it
covers that as well.

Good Luck,
Steve

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 1:07 PM

Bill wrote:

>
> To try to ease anyone's mind, I will share with you that I called a
> relative with 30 years electrical experience yesterday. I never
> actually saw him do any of the work (a shame), but I KNOW he did it! He
> agreed to drive three hundred miles each way and do the hookup to
> the main panel and check all of my work once I've wired the subpanel
> and everything that draws power from it. Feel a little better? : )
>

Much. Now - to satisfy that nobel curiosity of yours, make sure to let all
the air out of his tires so that he can't just hook it up and leave, so that
you'll have time to have him teach you things beyond just the work at hand.
Great opportunity to learn and gain some new skills.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

BA

Bob AZ

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 6:51 PM



> >> You are right about the 240v being, essentially, two 120v lines. =EF=
=BF=BDUnlike
> >> 120V, which has a Hot, Common and Ground, the 240 has (or can run on) =
2
> >> Hot and a Ground/Common. ...
>
> > To clarify for OP what could be misinterpreted given it appears little =
or
> > no familiarity exists...240V has _only_ two 120V 'hots' and an associat=
ed
> > ground, _no_ neutral.
Bill

Too much in your message(s) to really make meaningful/rational
comments.

So please get some more learning.

Also be aware that the RV power you mention is probably 30 or 50 amp
power. Sure it is 240 volt? And too small for the shop enviorment you
mention.

Where and how 240 volts is sourced to the consumer, has been mentioned
here, but the details that transform the high voltage on the power
pole or in the power vault that is near you property line is more
complex than what has been mentioned here.

If you add a power (sub)panel that is sourced from your service panel
remember that are limitations in the code. The neutral and the ground
need to be separate and not connected circuits.

Bob AZ

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

20/03/2010 8:42 AM

Bill wrote:

>
> You did a nice job of explaining that (about the wire size). I
> honestly thought that a malfunction
> in one tool on a circuit could possibly result in the damage to
> another tool on the same circuit.
> I considered the separate circuits cheap insurance and that's why *I*
> thought Lew suggested separate circuits (though
> he never actually said that). That's not the reason, huh?
>

Nope. You want to separate your circuits by voltage type, and by load.
That is to say, (somewhat the obvious...), you'll run 240v circuits to a
couple of locations, depending on your machine needs. For installed
compressors, I generally run a dedicated circuit. For 120v pancake or other
small compressors - there is no need to dedicate a branch, but for large
compressors, it's a good plan. As others have already said, if you're going
to use a DC, it's a good candidate for lonliness. Other machines can plug
into a common branch, simply because you're not going to be using them at
the same time.

Likewise, you'll run 120v branches. Depending on how big your shop is,
you'll probably run one or two branch circuits for standard 120v outlets.
It's more likely that you'll have more than one thing plugged in and in use
at the same time, that run off of 120v. Not just power tools, but other
things that might suck up a bit of current. For this reason, having more
than one branch circuit is a good practice. I usually wire in 8 or less
outlets in a shop environment, on a single branch circuit. Then add one for
lights. So, right out of the chute, you could easily plan on 3 120v branch
circuits and 2 or 3 240v branch circuits.

Having the extra 120v branch circuits helps to prevent the kegerator from
kicking everytime you fire up yer circular saw for example.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 3:58 PM

On 3/16/2010 3:50 PM, Bill wrote:
> Swingman wrote:
>
>> Besides kitchens and bathroom, most locales require GFCI protected
>> circuits in "garages" also ... a place where you, strangely enough,
>> find most woodworking "shops" these days. :)
>>
>
> iwires post from "mike_holts" forum, copied and pasted below
> (it makes interesting reading...). --Bill
>
>
>
> I will post the code rule for GFCIs in basements below but the short
> version is 15 and 20 amp 120 volt receptacles must have GFCI protection.

I trust you are not interpreting that to mean that ALL 15 and 20 amp 120
volt receptacles must have GFCI protection?

BTW, what's a "basement"? :)

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 9:36 AM

On 3/16/2010 9:12 AM, dpb wrote:

> And a separate circuit for every stationary tool unless you're a
> production shop w/ an employee at every workstation continuously through
> a shift is _WAY_ over the top overkill...

There may be one advantage (albeit slight) to wiring a "dedicated
circuit" for a stationary tool, particularly in shops in "garages" ... a
"dedicated circuit" is exempt from being GFCI protected in many locales.

At one time in the early days of GFCI, it was worth doing so as to not
have to deal with nuisance trips, which are no longer the problem they
once were.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 11:17 PM

Swingman wrote:

>
> AAMOF, and from my observation, it's starting to verge on getting
> dangerous.

Damn - I was going to say this earlier. I was getting concerned about Bill
reading a bunch of stuff (some good and some not so much...), from various
web sites, etc. and was going to suggest that after reading about him
starting to "probe" into panels based on what he was reading, was becoming
of concern.

Bill - I'd really suggest you hook up with an electrician and get some real
hands-on time. I'm a bit concerned that you might not really understand the
stuff that's behind the grey panel cover. That could be very dangerous.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 10:11 AM

On 3/21/2010 4:36 AM, Bill wrote:
> "Mike Marlow"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Bill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Another tip I learned while reading was to shut off all of the circuit
>>> breakers, before shutting off the main one, before adding a new one.
>>> Like Swingman says, this stuff makes sense, you just need someone to
>>> tell you what makes sense.
>>
>> Don't know where you learned that one Bill, but it's not right. There is
>> no need to shut off all of the branch breakers before shutting of the main
>> and there is no need to shut off the main before inserting a new breaker.
>>
>
> Thanks Mike. I read it at a do-it-yourself website. Thank you for pointing
> out
> that the web sites suggestion lacked integrity. FWIW, the justification at
> the
> web site was that it would result in less of a jolt to the system to turn
> off all the
> breakers before turning off the main one. Anything to that?

Bill ... there are two things that you need to keep in mind before
messing with electricity as a DIY'er, and that WILL protect you:

1. Protect yourself, from yourself, and from the wiring mistakes of
those who came before you by turning off the electricity to the entire
structure AT THE SOURCE.

2. No one has ever been electrocuted by a completely, and verifiably
_dead_, un-powered, un-electrified system ... IOW, and as Lew indicated
... go to the actual SOURCE, turn it off, lock it up, and put the key in
your pocket until you're done.

Another thing I've noted about your posts ... you keep talking about the
damned NEC.

Forget it! Reading the NEC is nothing but a confusing waste of your time
and you will learn nothing of a practical nature from reading it ...
guaranteed!

Leave the NEC to the inspectors and kibitzers.

Instead, buy yourself a couple of BASIC books on home wiring, starting
with something that covers the basics with lots of illustrations like these:

http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Guide-Home-Wiring-Comprehensive/dp/0865734291/ref=sip_rech_dp_10

http://www.amazon.com/Orthos-About-Wiring-Basics-Improvement/dp/0897214404

You will learn more about the practical things you need to know to
actually wire your shop then you'll ever learn by reading the NEC, or
even hanging around the wRec asking scatter gun questions that are so
uninformed that they are difficult to answer, thus running a real risk
of receiving advice, or misinterpreting that advice, that may hurt you.

What you needed here you basically already have, good practical advice
on what to buy and what you need in order to design a good shop wiring
scheme.

At this point, your next step is to go learn how to do it ... and you're
simply not going to do that here.

AAMOF, and from my observation, it's starting to verge on getting dangerous.

;)

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 7:43 AM

On Mar 16, 10:30=A0am, "Dave In Texas" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > You really don't need to install a disconnect for a dedicated circuit t=
o
> > each machine in your home shop.
>
> =A0 =A0 When I wired my garshop I did two separate 240v circuits; one run=
s the
> dust collector and the other the table saw and a 5hp compressor (neither =
of
> which ever runs congruently). =A0 How often do you run more than one devi=
ce at
> a time?
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Additionally, I ran four 120v circuits, two for power too=
ls with
> each wall having a mix of both circuits and a single circuit each for the
> freezer and a "beer box."
>
> Dave in Houston

Proper beer boxes are 550-V 3-phase, no?

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 11:12 PM

J. Clarke wrote:

>
> While there is no _need_, turning them all off is a good idea in that
> when you turn the main back on you don't get every electrical device
> in the house starting up at once. Usually a nonissue but if you have
> a bunch of inductive loads you may not be able to reset the main
> breaker without turning off the others or turning off the loads.
>

It's the "usually" part of the above that is operative. I'll be none of us,
and certainly no one in Bill's category will ever have to worry about this.
True point, but not really relevant to Bill's world.

> And turning the main off before adding a breaker may not be strictly
> necessary, but if you're a butterfingers like me it's a damned good
> idea.

Oh you chicken...

>
> Both are common sense. They do no harm and may do some good.

They do no harm, for sure. But, they really don't do any good either.
Unless...

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 3:52 PM

On 3/16/2010 3:35 PM, Bill wrote:
> Lew Hodgett wrote:

>> I'm not going to get into a pissing contest over a c'bkr that costs
>> less than $10, but dedicating a 2P-30 c'bkr for each 240V load not
>> only simplifies the installation but also allows you to isolate a
>> problem load without affecting other loads.
>>
> ...
>> Lew
>
>
>
> When the idea of adding an additional (flip) switch to each 240v circuit
> was suggested that was one of my concerns--that it was something else to
> go wrong, which would in turn would make it harder to isolate a problem.

This is a different issue than Lew's quote above.

I could have read his replied to post wrong, but it looks like Lew
"assumed" that I was talking about using two single poles c'bkrs in
place of a single two pole circuit breaker; and likewise when he was
assuming that you can't insert a 2 pole circuit breaker into any two
slots in any panel designed for using half height c'bkrs.

... if it is what it reads like, he is wrong in both assumptions. If
not, then I apologize in advance for reading it wrong.

> I've got an inexpensive voltimeter which has worked fine for working
> with 12v in the car, but I'm not sure whether it would be prudent to
> plug it into a 240v outlet. I won't say I'm skeered, but I was thinking
> about using it with gloves! : ) I sure believe I should test any
> outlet before I plug a new $1000 tool into it.

Don't know about your voltmeter, but ones that can be used for testing
all voltages are very inexpensive and handy to have it you're going to
be doing your own electrical work.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 11:36 PM

Bill wrote:

>
> I'll take care to try to work smart. Somebody broke the lock off on
> what I think may be my
> main shut off (and as noted, this is important!). I may call the
> power company.

Bill - I am not trying to be insulting, but I am getting increasingly
concerned. I have to ask you (and I hope you will think about this
question...), how can you possibly work smart when you don't even know what
"may be" your electrical shut off? You really need more knowledge before
you move forward. Spend the money - bring in an electrician, and learn from
him while he works.

> Let me describe my electric:
>
> Back of house has meter. Another meter is on the pole away from the
> house and just below
> is is a box with a 15A circuit breaker (which should probably have a
> lock on its box)! I was
> thinking this may be my main shutoff (and this is something I would
> really like to know).

Stop here Bill. You really need someone who knows this stuff to walk you
through this. Do yourself a favor and go that route.

> 4 feet above this meter is a 3' by 2' by 2' metal box
> (transformer/distributer?) which
> makes quite a lot of noise, and 20 feet or more above that is a 5 or
> 6 foot cylindrical thing (transformer?)

See above comment.

> near which power lines flow to other poles with cylindrical things 3
> or 4 houses away. What would be really nice to know
> is whether the 15A circuit breaker might be my "main shutoff"--but any
> relavant info would
> be useful to me, I'm sure.

No - it is not and I'll repeat my recommendation that you have not learned
enough from you diligent research to enable you to safely embark on your
mission. You have a great deal to learn, but it is information you could
learn quickly enough if you're willing to invest the time. Bring in that
electrician.

>
> I promise to strive to keep learning on my own.

That might possibly be your riskiest move...


> Thank you for your
> indulgence. I bought a pair
> of linesman's pliers--almost time to learn to use them!
>

You're scaring me Bill...

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

Ns

"Nonny"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 4:34 PM


"Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>

> FWIW, the last two contractors I've hired (non-electrical) acted
> like I was in the way ("are you
> going to do it, or am I going to do it?"). I'm naturally drawn
> towards people who have something
> to teach me (and, conversely, I teach as part of my profession).
>
> I'm equivalently excited about the electrical as I would be a
> new woodworking project.
> I came home with my subpanel feeling like it was Christmas--for
> only $29.99)! I told my
> wife I would not have been as excited about a $250
> Solid-State-Drive (for the computer).
> So, with all due respect, there's something deeper than the
> greenback at stake here.
> It's more about control. Learning the skill to install
> switches, lights and and plugs everywhere and anywhere
> in the house I want. It feels good! Similarly, I bought a bunch
> of drywall tools--so I can practice in the garage and do
> nice paint and drywall work throughout my home. I think a lot
> is about
> the accomplishment that comes from doing something myself.
> Similarly, I'm interested in
> landscaping my yard--it's a canvas. The idea of paying someone
> else to do "my art" is completely unthinkable. When I mount
> several outlets and light panels on my shop ceiling it will be
> done in a more perfect than I could pay anyone to do, as no one
> cares about it more than I do. Maybe I do all this out of love.
> I'm Vawey passionate! : )
>
> amateur---a person who engages in a study, sport, or other
> activity for pleasure rather than for financial benefit or
> professional reasons
>

Bill, I sure agree with what you say. I'm like you in a way, and
want to see and participate if reasonably possible in things done
for me. I've never been embarrassed to look over the shoulder of
a mechanic adjusting a carb or timing the distributor, have not
hesitated to "join in and watch" when they're doing my brakes etc.
It isn't for money and sure as heck isn't intended to "impress
them with all that I know." Instead, it's a bit like going to
school and watching a prof. working in the lab.

FWIW, I've also hired things done that I was perfectly capable of
doing myself, but just didn't want to do. About 15 years back, we
were having a big shindig at the house and I wanted my deck
pressure washed and restained. The guy kept promising to show up
and do it, but then would miss the appointment. Finally, I said,
"To heck with him," (or something like that), and got out my
pressure washer, cleared the stuff off the deck and from beneath
it, and washed it thoroughly. The following AM, I masked off the
house, got out my airless sprayer, bought 15 gallons of stain and
easily did most of the deck. The only glitch was having to send
the bride to the store for more stain. I did the deck inside and
out, of course, but also underneath as well.

Soon after finishing and replacing the furniture, grill fountains,
foliage etc., the guy showed up with his pressure washer in the
back of the truck. His eyes got big when he saw the deck and
wondered who I'd hired to do it. I told him, "Brad, there's a
difference between not being able or having the equipment to do
something, and just not wanting to do it myself."

--
Nonny

Our Congress and White House are like an
overflowing, fetid toilet. It’s time to flush it, though
knowing it will soon refill with the same filth. We need
a radical change where the productive people again rule.

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

23/03/2010 12:29 PM

On 3/23/2010 11:40 AM, Bill wrote:
> Swingman wrote:
>> On 3/23/2010 10:04 AM, Bill wrote:
>>
>>> Those of you who have been following this thread may find another true
>>> story amusing: About 2 dozen years back when I worked on Fort Sill, OK
>>> (home of the "Field Artillery School"),
>>
>> Small world ... I'm a graduate of "Comanche County Canon Cockers
>> College" myself. Took AIT there, and graduated from Field Artillery
>> Officer Candidate School after that.
>>
>> I liked OK ... except for the 3.2 beer, and the cowgirls who could
>> whip your butt in a game of 8 ball and holler "next!".
>>
>> :)
>
> I didn't mind the 3.2 beer. I used to practice my 8-ball at the "Little
> Brown Jug" on Fort Sill Blvd. sometimes on the weekend. That was one of
> the "classier" little bars in that area. I learned that I liked Korean
> food at the little cafe about 4 doors down from there. I maintained my
> enthusiasm for Korean food for quite a while. It made me sweat a lot
> when I ate it, but I ate it anyway. Unfortunately, I've since had to go
> with a kinder, gentler diet. I enjoyed the wildlife refuge at Fort Sill
> alot--hiking, climbing, fishing... That was a nice amenity. Fond
> memories...

Was a great place for Western Swing too.

There was an old fashioned beer joint/dance hall/roadhouse down the road
from Lawton, in Cache, OK, ... a place where I got to see many of my
musical heroes, like Hank Thompson, and many musicians who had been with
Bob Wills in the 30's and 40's, playing in bands who came through the
area ... I've actually had the pleasure of playing with many of them
since I first saw them there in the sixties.

Years later, and just for grins, I went back to OK and took the farrier
course at Bud Beaston's Oklahoma Farriers College in Sperry, to once
again get my butt whipped by Oklahoman, female pool players. :)

You're right, fond memories ...

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 2:38 PM

Dave In Texas wrote:
> "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>> You really don't need to install a disconnect for a dedicated
>> circuit to each machine in your home shop.
>
> When I wired my garshop I did two separate 240v circuits; one runs
> the dust collector and the other the table saw and a 5hp compressor
> (neither of which ever runs congruently). How often do you run more
> than one device at a time?

The compressor is the one I'd consider being hardwired by itself. There are
a lot of times when I'm using another tool while the compressor is running.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 10:23 AM

On Mar 15, 12:04=A0pm, "Lee Michaels"
<leemichaels*[email protected]> wrote:
> "Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote
> On Mar 15, 11:25 am, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 3/15/2010 12:57 AM, Bill wrote:
>
> > > Here is a relavant DIY-type link I found, in case anyone else is
> > > interested:
>
> > >http://www.hammerzone.com/archives/elect/panel/sub_panel/01/new.htm
>
> > Do what Lew said ...
>
> > I REPEAT: Do what Lew said!!
>
> > If you do what Lew said you will have no problems installing a sub-pane=
l
> > of the right kind that will be flexible and codeworthy (you haven't got
> > into the issue of "grounding" a sub-panel yet, and, depending upon the
> > location, you will most likely need to address grounding with an
> > "insulated ground bar" which generally has to be purchased separately
> > from the breaker box and installed therein).
>
> > Save yourself some time, money, and redoing, by paying particular
> > attention to what Lew said!
>
> > Got the point yet?
>
> > If not, get it ... by doing what Lew said! :)
>
> > --www.e-woodshop.net
> > Last update: 10/22/08
> > KarlC@ (the obvious)
>
> I think he should do what Lew said to do.
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> Does that include the installation of the epoxy workstation?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

you are mean......*smirk*

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 6:51 AM

On 3/22/2010 12:02 AM, Bill wrote:

> No one answered my question--what the 15A c'breaker below the meter on the
> pole below the transformers(?) might be for--maybe a protector for the meter
> on the pole? The lock rusted off of it and apparently the electric company
> isn't concerned.

On your side of the meter that meters your electrical usage?

If it's on your side of the meter the electric company may not want to
even be involved, their involvement stops at either their side of the
meter, or in many places at the service head.

Do you have an outdoor light? A 15A exterior circuit sounds like it
would be for exterior lighting, or perhaps feeding an exterior
receptacle for garden use.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

Mike M

in reply to Swingman on 22/03/2010 6:51 AM

24/03/2010 8:37 PM

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:29:15 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> dpb wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> Since it is a co-operative, it is customer-owned and important to have
>>> enough folks to show up for the annual meetings ...
>>
>> OBTW...
>>
>> If yours is anything like all others with which have any connection or
>> contact (and that's quite a number w/ length of association thru folks and
>> continued since returning to the home place and serving on board), it'll
>> be from a fairly major to perhaps the premier social event of the year for
>> the long-term members. The more the number of rural members as opposed to
>> the residential customers the higher on the scale that will be,
>> undoubtedly...
>>
>>
>
>
>dpb,
>
>Thank you for filling me in regarding many of the details of my "electrical
>cooperative"!
>I understood the intent, but I didn't have the perspective. Two surrounding
>cities are fighting over the right to tax our area. I don't know a lot
>about the details but
>I know I have to pay a 3rd party to pick up our garbage--and I think it's
>cheaper that
>way too. My property taxes are currently "very reasonable".
>
>I'll try to make it to the annual meeting of my electrical cooperative: the
>"premier social event" --O'boy!
>
>Best,
>Bill
>
Bill I think this is a case of turning a mole hill into a mountain.
If its not being billed to you forget it and go back to building your
shop. If you'd paid an electrician a few hours to come out you
probably would have been ahead of the game already with a contract to
finish what you weren't sure of doing for your shop.

Mike M

BB

"Bill"

in reply to Swingman on 22/03/2010 6:51 AM

25/03/2010 1:11 AM


"Mike M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:29:15 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> dpb wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Since it is a co-operative, it is customer-owned and important to have
>>>> enough folks to show up for the annual meetings ...
>>>
>>> OBTW...
>>>
>>> If yours is anything like all others with which have any connection or
>>> contact (and that's quite a number w/ length of association thru folks
>>> and
>>> continued since returning to the home place and serving on board), it'll
>>> be from a fairly major to perhaps the premier social event of the year
>>> for
>>> the long-term members. The more the number of rural members as opposed
>>> to
>>> the residential customers the higher on the scale that will be,
>>> undoubtedly...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>dpb,
>>
>>Thank you for filling me in regarding many of the details of my
>>"electrical
>>cooperative"!
>>I understood the intent, but I didn't have the perspective. Two
>>surrounding
>>cities are fighting over the right to tax our area. I don't know a lot
>>about the details but
>>I know I have to pay a 3rd party to pick up our garbage--and I think it's
>>cheaper that
>>way too. My property taxes are currently "very reasonable".
>>
>>I'll try to make it to the annual meeting of my electrical cooperative:
>>the
>>"premier social event" --O'boy!
>>
>>Best,
>>Bill
>>
> Bill I think this is a case of turning a mole hill into a mountain.
> If its not being billed to you forget it and go back to building your
> shop. If you'd paid an electrician a few hours to come out you
> probably would have been ahead of the game already with a contract to
> finish what you weren't sure of doing for your shop.
>
> Mike M

Mike, I have considered my quesiton basically resolved. We've had some
interesting
discussions as well. On a long walk I took today (to my car) I thought in
awe
of how remarkable it was that we had a discussion at all. I thought about
how
wonderful it was to connect with real people, and I pondered whether they
realized they were connecting to a real person too. I thought about Fort
Sill.

Concerning the work, I thought I already explained about how I was going to
pursue that. Looking now at my schedule, I seem to be right on schedule.
I am quite at peace with it. And I probably know more about that box under
my
meter now than any electrician who would have shown up at my door--and,
based upon my experience, they would probably not have been interested in
discussing it. But some of the people at the Wrec got to the bottom of it.
And I learned
a lot of interesting knowledge/history about electrical-cooperatives--info,
I most
sure would not have recieved from an electrician who showed up at my door.
The next time I do the wiring I'll probably hire a contractor--it would be
too much
like going to the same vacation-spot twice...

Bill

BB

Bill

in reply to Swingman on 22/03/2010 6:51 AM

25/03/2010 10:57 AM

Bill wrote:

> The next time I do the wiring I'll probably hire a contractor--it would be
> too much like going to the same vacation-spot twice...

Sorry about that exaggeration. I really didn't mean that. The rest I
was quite sincere about.

Bill

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 8:49 AM

Delbert Freeman wrote:
...

> You are right about the 240v being, essentially, two 120v lines. Unlike
> 120V, which has a Hot, Common and Ground, the 240 has (or can run on) 2
> Hot and a Ground/Common. ...

To clarify for OP what could be misinterpreted given it appears little
or no familiarity exists...240V has _only_ two 120V 'hots' and an
associated ground, _no_ neutral.

Three wire appliance outlets (no longer NEC Code-compliant, now need
four) utilized the ground conductor as the 120V neutral as well for the
120V (components like motor, light, etc.) but the 240V heater coil is
tied directly across the two hot and isn't anywhere connected to a
"neutral". Ditto for 240V motors; there's a third wire but it's ground,
not neutral and the motor doesn't care whether it's there or not.

To go on for OP who seemed surprised to learn what 240V comprises, the
240V is generated by tapping from a transformer at such points that one
leg is 180-deg out of phase (in time) w/ the other so when one leg is at
the positive sine peak the other is at it's negative max. The RMS
difference between these is then the 240V your voltmeter sees while each
(being AC) measures 120V to a neutral. While these are commonly called
"phases", the phase there is the time shift within a single one of the
three phase generation phases from the powerco. It's still single-phase
power.

--

MM

Mike M

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 8:49 AM

17/03/2010 1:04 AM


On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:30:30 -0500, "Dave In Texas" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
>"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>
>> There is one gotcha to watch for when using a 220 c'bkr in a load center
>> which, by design, can be used with both full size and mini breakers:
>>
>> When using these load centers it is possible to insert the full size
>> 220/240v c'bkr into two adjacent slots that are both fed by one hot leg
>> ... the result being that you will get no voltage to the tool whatsoever.
>>
>> Nothing dangerous will result, but you'll be left scratching your head. :)
>>
>> Basically, just be careful when you install a 220/240v c'bkr that you put
>> it in two adjacent slots where each draws from a different bus. You can do
>> this visually.
>
> And, I've got three-phase! Which I've never been able to utilize . . .
>except once - by stupidity.
> 12 or 15 years ago I finally got around to putting in a dedicated
>circuit for my kitchen refrigerator. Only I plugged that 20 amp single pole
>into one leg of the three phase. WOW! You can't believe how bright a 15
>watt appliance bulb can get. The freezer fan was the only casualty.
>Fortunately I had an appliance repair man that made Sunday house calls.
>And, that side-by-side Kenmore lasted 20+ years.
>
>Dave in Houston

TThis sounds like you have a high leg service where one leg is 208
volt to ground.

Mike M

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 3:34 PM

Thank you for the lessons in electricity! I take it I should be installing
"4-wire" outlets if I'm
planning to purchase new 220v tools from Delta or Grizzly, correct?

I've done a bit of reading, so I'm not as naive as I was a week ago, but I
was surprised to learn:

"240V is generated by tapping from a transformer at such points that one
> leg is 180-deg out of phase (in time) w/ the other so when one leg is at
> the positive sine peak the other is at it's negative max. The RMS
> difference between these is then the 240V your voltmeter sees while each
> (being AC) measures 120V to a neutral.

I have also learned about 3-phase power and the correspondance to induction
motors so this makes sense to
me in that context--expecially in that the hot lines to coils in the motor
will be hooked up in parallel rather than in series as in 120v
(that is the most sophisticated statement I can make about this matter at
this point and I offer it only as an indication of my level of preparedness
which is weak due to limited experience. I expect I can do this project if
I proceed cautiously).

I probably should examine a book (on setting up/modifying new existing
lines). Any suggestions regarding a book? I recall seeing a few books on
wiring at the BORGs.

Thank you,
Bill





"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Delbert Freeman wrote:
> ...
>
>> You are right about the 240v being, essentially, two 120v lines. Unlike
>> 120V, which has a Hot, Common and Ground, the 240 has (or can run on) 2
>> Hot and a Ground/Common. ...
>
> To clarify for OP what could be misinterpreted given it appears little or
> no familiarity exists...240V has _only_ two 120V 'hots' and an associated
> ground, _no_ neutral.
>
> Three wire appliance outlets (no longer NEC Code-compliant, now need four)
> utilized the ground conductor as the 120V neutral as well for the 120V
> (components like motor, light, etc.) but the 240V heater coil is tied
> directly across the two hot and isn't anywhere connected to a "neutral".
> Ditto for 240V motors; there's a third wire but it's ground, not neutral
> and the motor doesn't care whether it's there or not.
>
> To go on for OP who seemed surprised to learn what 240V comprises, the
> 240V is generated by tapping from a transformer at such points that one
> leg is 180-deg out of phase (in time) w/ the other so when one leg is at
> the positive sine peak the other is at it's negative max. The RMS
> difference between these is then the 240V your voltmeter sees while each
> (being AC) measures 120V to a neutral. While these are commonly called
> "phases", the phase there is the time shift within a single one of the
> three phase generation phases from the powerco. It's still single-phase
> power.
>
> --

Nn

Nova

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:34 PM

20/03/2010 6:51 AM

Bill wrote:
> "Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*nadaspam*@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>"Bill" wrote
>>
>>>Mike M wrote:
>>>
>>> Just remember
>>>
>>>>to protect the wiring if your using sheathed cable or anything that
>>>>could be punctured by a screw or nail.
>>>
>>>
>>>I'll have to read up on the right way to approach this. Thank you for
>>>mentioning it! To me %-), It seems like the best protection is to know
>>>where the wires are. I read a suggestion somewhere to "sketch the layout
>>>of the wires". What sort of protection are you thinking of--I assume
>>>something that would lie in the attic rather than through the studs?
>>>

> Lee,
>
> A wiring diagram like that would be great! I made it part of my
> counter-offer that the sellers
> label the 2 dozen circuit breakers in the main panel (and I'm glad I did)!
> : )
> There's one for each ceiling fan, the sump pump, and the list goes on...
> The wires are not labeled.

Another thing I like to do it to use a permanent marker to write the
circuit breaker number associated with each outlet or switch in an area
next to each so that it's covered by the outlet cover/switch plate. It
makes things a little easier when it becomes necessary to replace an
outlet or switch.


--
Jack Novak
Buffalo, NY - USA
[email protected]

LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:34 PM

19/03/2010 8:05 PM


"Bill" wrote
> Mike M wrote:
>
> Just remember
>> to protect the wiring if your using sheathed cable or anything that
>> could be punctured by a screw or nail.
>
>
> I'll have to read up on the right way to approach this. Thank you for
> mentioning it! To me %-), It seems like the best protection is to know
> where the wires are. I read a suggestion somewhere to "sketch the layout
> of the wires". What sort of protection are you thinking of--I assume
> something that would lie in the attic rather than through the studs?
>
Two comments.

If going through studs, get some of those metal protective plates designed
to protect the wiring. Just pound themon the stud and they are covered.

If going in the attic, realize over time that the wiring can get buried
indust, etc. Ihave seen a couple attic wiring jobs that placed the wiring up
in the air on boxes or had some kind of bright , warning type of ribbon
around it. The idea is that if you don't go up therre for five years, you
will have no problem finding the wires and working on them.

Along those lines, a wiring diagram, laminated in plastic, and tacked up
where you can see it would be nice as well.


Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:34 PM

19/03/2010 10:01 PM

On 3/19/2010 7:05 PM, Lee Michaels wrote:
\
> If going in the attic, realize over time that the wiring can get buried
> indust, etc. Ihave seen a couple attic wiring jobs that placed the wiring up
> in the air on boxes or had some kind of bright , warning type of ribbon
> around it. The idea is that if you don't go up therre for five years, you
> will have no problem finding the wires and working on them.
>
> Along those lines, a wiring diagram, laminated in plastic, and tacked up
> where you can see it would be nice as well.

Digital camera ...

... put the pictures on a CD, keep it as a reference, then give it to
the next owner. It's what I do for all electrical, mechanical and
plumbing rough-ins, and even framing, blocking, and shear wall nailing
patterns.

Been doing it for years, and the simple practice has saved literally
tens of thousands of dollars in re-do's.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

Mike M

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:34 PM

19/03/2010 11:08 AM

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:01:16 -0400, Bill <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Mike M wrote:
>
>> The main thing in running your circuits at this point is to get good
>> wiring in the walls. As was stated don't run less then #12. If in
>> doubt for the future run a 12-3 or 10-3 wire set up and cap the unused
>> wire. In the future if you need to have 240 at a outlet you have the
>> extra wire. Depending on your construction its wise to install some
>> conduit, flex or smurf tube to be able to pull additional circuits,
>> cable or phone lines. If you have an accessible attic a lot of this
>> can be done as risers for future use.
>>
>> Mike M
>
>Mike, Thank you for some very good ideas!
>
>I DO HAVE an accessible attic, and I believe that most, if not all, of
>the wires from the main panel go right up to it. I had been debating
>with myself whether to wire "through the attic" or through the studs.
>One factor is that the wall I wish to add the outlets to first tops out
>at the eaves. I thought that a combination would be easiest--attic to a
>wall, down, and then through the studs. No NEC violations in sight,
>right??? Anything to be wary of (the attic is not living space)?
>Do you agree that this makes sense, even if I have to rip down a bunch
>of wallboard to do it?
>
>Bill

I would do most of it through the walls just because its easier on
your body. The main reason to run extra pipes to the attic is for
the future needs that always come up so that you don't have to cut the
wall covering.. A combination would be fine as well. Just remember
to protect the wiring if your using sheathed cable or anything that
could be punctured by a screw or nail. Another point that others have
brought up is the advantage of keeping your outlets above 4' so they
don't get covered up by sheet goods leaned against the wall.

Mike M

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:34 PM

19/03/2010 3:48 PM

Mike M wrote:

Just remember
> to protect the wiring if your using sheathed cable or anything that
> could be punctured by a screw or nail.


I'll have to read up on the right way to approach this. Thank you for
mentioning it! To me %-), It seems like the best protection is to know
where the wires are. I read a suggestion somewhere to "sketch the
layout of the wires". What sort of protection are you thinking of--I
assume something that would lie in the attic rather than through the studs?

Thank you,
Bill

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:34 PM

19/03/2010 4:47 PM

Bill wrote:
> Mike M wrote:
>
> Just remember
>> to protect the wiring if your using sheathed cable or anything that
>> could be punctured by a screw or nail.
>
>
> I'll have to read up on the right way to approach this. Thank you for
> mentioning it! To me %-), It seems like the best protection is to know
> where the wires are. I read a suggestion somewhere to "sketch the
> layout of the wires". What sort of protection are you thinking of--I
> assume something that would lie in the attic rather than through the studs?

If thru studs, place holes in center to maximize distance from each side
to the cable(s). They make metal stud plates to put on the face of the
stud over the hole location that are stout enough to tell installer
"don't do that" when hanging sheetrock, etc. I 16d w/ a 20oz framer or
pneumatic gun won't be phased, but there's little likelihood of that in
finishing, obviously.

When running cable vertically in the cavity, it's to be fastened at the
box and then keep it in the middle as well. A hollow cavity it can just
be loose as then there's no restriction such it'll just move. If
insulating, again keep it in the center of the stud and staple just to
get it out of the way for insulating and you're good to go.

Surface mount is another issue, but doesn't sound like you're intending
any of that...

All above, of course, assumes you're not somewhere like Chicago that
local Code requires BX still or some other silliness...

--

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:34 PM

19/03/2010 7:28 PM


"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> When running cable vertically in the cavity, it's to be fastened at the
> box and then keep it in the middle as well. A hollow cavity it can just
> be loose as then there's no restriction such it'll just move. If
> insulating, again keep it in the center of the stud and staple just to get
> it out of the way for insulating and you're good to go.

Thank you, this is very helpful. There isn't a problem insulating right up
to the
panels is there (all 4 sides)?

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:34 PM

19/03/2010 9:07 PM


"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*nadaspam*@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bill" wrote
>> Mike M wrote:
>>
>> Just remember
>>> to protect the wiring if your using sheathed cable or anything that
>>> could be punctured by a screw or nail.
>>
>>
>> I'll have to read up on the right way to approach this. Thank you for
>> mentioning it! To me %-), It seems like the best protection is to know
>> where the wires are. I read a suggestion somewhere to "sketch the layout
>> of the wires". What sort of protection are you thinking of--I assume
>> something that would lie in the attic rather than through the studs?
>>
> Two comments.
>
> If going through studs, get some of those metal protective plates designed
> to protect the wiring. Just pound themon the stud and they are covered.
>
> If going in the attic, realize over time that the wiring can get buried
> indust, etc. Ihave seen a couple attic wiring jobs that placed the wiring
> up in the air on boxes or had some kind of bright , warning type of ribbon
> around it. The idea is that if you don't go up therre for five years, you
> will have no problem finding the wires and working on them.
>


> Along those lines, a wiring diagram, laminated in plastic, and tacked up
> where you can see it would be nice as well.

Lee,

A wiring diagram like that would be great! I made it part of my
counter-offer that the sellers
label the 2 dozen circuit breakers in the main panel (and I'm glad I did)!
: )
There's one for each ceiling fan, the sump pump, and the list goes on...
The wires are not labeled.

The "bright warning ribbon" idea you mentioned seems very good. I'll make
that
labeling process part of mapping out what I'm dealing with.

I stll haven't made that long trek accross all of the joists yet (though the
length
of the attic). My neighbor fell through his ceiling on one of his first
treks...
Why worry, I guess, it's only drywall! The house-inspector trotted right
across.

Bill




ST

Steve Turner

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:34 PM

20/03/2010 7:57 AM

On 03/20/2010 05:51 AM, Nova wrote:
> Another thing I like to do it to use a permanent marker to write the
> circuit breaker number associated with each outlet or switch in an area
> next to each so that it's covered by the outlet cover/switch plate. It
> makes things a little easier when it becomes necessary to replace an
> outlet or switch.

Yes! In fact, what would be wrong with having some obvious standard marking on every dang
switch plate and outlet in the house that says exactly which breaker it's tied to? How many
times have I done some wiring work and had somebody at the far end of the house yell to me
that I've finally turned off the correct breaker after trying three or four others? We
usually have to reset every clock in the house after that happens. :-)

--
See Nad. See Nad go. Go Nad!
To reply, eat the taco.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 4:39 PM

Bill wrote:
> Thank you for the lessons in electricity! I take it I should be
installing
> "4-wire" outlets if I'm planning to purchase new 220v tools from
> Delta or Grizzly, correct?

Not for "ordinary" 240V outlets, no. The four-wire connection is for
things like appliances that have both 240V and 120V loads that _used_ to
share the grounding conductor for the 120V neutral. A power saw, etc.,
that is just a 240V motor load doesn't have any use for the 120V and so
doesn't need anything other than the usual 3-wire 240V.

Used to be stuff like drill presses, etc., had a 120V accessory light
that was powered by one side of the 240V in a similar fashion but it
seems based on some other postings here that they've quit doing that in
one of two ways -- either no more courtesy light or it requires a 240V bulb.

OBTW, this is for US 120V/240V obviously, the UK and others run 240V as
does the US 120V w/ a single hot/neutral and don't have 120V routinely
(which is why ordinary US appliances are of essentially no value over
there, of course... :) ).

...

> I probably should examine a book (on setting up/modifying new existing
> lines). Any suggestions regarding a book? I recall seeing a few books on
> wiring at the BORGs.
...

I better let somebody else recommend recent books rather than guess --
I'm so much an old fogey the most recent thing I have dates to the 80s
maybe at the latest and may well be 20 yrs older than that, even, I'm
not sure... :)

I know most of the biggest new restrictions in the NEC simply by word of
mouth; I also tend to ignore most of them here on the farm and in the
shop figuring if it's been good enough for 50 years or so it couldn't
have been _too_ bad... :) That, of course, isn't to be taken as a
recommendation against following Code in new work...

--

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 9:50 PM


"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 3/14/2010 2:34 PM, Bill wrote:
>> Thank you for the lessons in electricity! I take it I should be
>> installing
>> "4-wire" outlets if I'm
>> planning to purchase new 220v tools from Delta or Grizzly, correct?
>
> Nope ... most 220/240v woodworking tools in North America only need a
> total of 3 wires to both work properly and comply with code.
>


> The three wires needed for 220/240v operation are: Two hot wires (one from
> each hot leg of the service/sub panel), and one ground wire. The ground
> wire, while not necessary to power the equipment, is necessary for safety
> and code compliance.

Isn't the ground, then, "completing the circuit" in this case?


BTW, I noticed that my outlet on the outside has a single 30 Amp breaker
and that the interior one has a double 50-Amp breaker (s). The 30 Amp one
on the outside
was used by the previously owner for his RV and the interior one for
welding.

My biggest tool will be a 3HP TS which Grizzly suggests a 20 Amp circuit
for. My thought was to
put a Delta 1.5 HP DC on the 30 Amp line and a series of outlets along a
wall that would support
other 220v machinery (including the TS). It seems like the 50-Amp circuit
would support several machines, one-at-a-time,
with the possible future attachment of things like a heater, for example,
later if desired.
Additionally, I'd add another 120v line for the same wall (outlets about 4
feet apart) and provide another
120v line for use by the workbench (tools).

Currently, my garage lights and outlets share a line with with the kitchen
outlets, and it is nice that a pair of
garage lights come on with the flip of a switch from the kitchen. I may add
another line for the
ceiling which would support 4 florescent lights and for whatever tool might
be convenient to plug in there.

So, that would proivde me with a total of 3 120v lines and 2 240v lines for
tools and would leave me with 3 empty slots in my junction box. Some person
dedicated two 120v lines to power 2 separate bedroom ceiling fans (seems
like a waste). Powering them from other existing circuits is probably not
worth the bother since I don't know how to easily do it. Powering them
together with one circuit may be worth considering, if necessary! If
nothing else, it would give me something to do in my free time after I
finish grinding and epoxying the floor. ; )

SWMBO is ready to see furniture being made! ; ) She doesn't see this as
all being part of the process.

Every time I come back here I think this through a little further..I'm going
to print this out so I don't forget! ; )

Thanks,
Bill

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 9:50 PM

20/03/2010 8:30 AM

Bill wrote:

>
> I thought it was extremely valuable to learn that nail plates were a
> code issue
> on 2 by 4 studs. I thought the documentation techniques were
> interesting too.

Oh, indeed - most of the ideas were great ideas. Especially in complex
wiring environments where they are a must.


--

-Mike-
[email protected]

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 9:50 PM

20/03/2010 12:38 AM

Mike M wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:48:18 -0400, Bill <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Mike M wrote:
>>
>> Just remember
>>> to protect the wiring if your using sheathed cable or anything that
>>> could be punctured by a screw or nail.
>>
>>
>> I'll have to read up on the right way to approach this. Thank you for
>> mentioning it! To me %-), It seems like the best protection is to
>> know where the wires are. I read a suggestion somewhere to "sketch
>> the
>> layout of the wires". What sort of protection are you thinking of--I
>> assume something that would lie in the attic rather than through the
>> studs?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Bill
>
> Like dpb said they make a nail plate. If you have 2x6 studs the
> center should be ok. Its also a code thing for 2x4's. On commercial
> jobs we labeled every box with what panel it was fed from and which
> circuits are in it.. Reommend the same for your shop. You can skip
> the panel id as you'll know it but labeling the breaker number on a
> receptacle can save you time. Used to do a lot of work for Kenworth
> truck and they maintained a cad drawing of the entire electrical
> system. We were assigned circuits and panels for what we were
> installing and labeled every junction box with the information.
>
> Mike M

Oye!!! Guys - we're talking about a very simple residental wiring job here.
Sure - we can all come up with great ideas that should grace the pages of
Popular Electricity, but this is a basic home wiring job. There's lots of
ways to convince a homeowner to overcomplicate a job, and we're hitting most
of them.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

Pp

Puckdropper

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 9:50 PM

20/03/2010 3:29 AM

Mike M <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> Like dpb said they make a nail plate. If you have 2x6 studs the
> center should be ok. Its also a code thing for 2x4's. On commercial
> jobs we labeled every box with what panel it was fed from and which
> circuits are in it.. Reommend the same for your shop. You can skip
> the panel id as you'll know it but labeling the breaker number on a
> receptacle can save you time. Used to do a lot of work for Kenworth
> truck and they maintained a cad drawing of the entire electrical
> system. We were assigned circuits and panels for what we were
> installing and labeled every junction box with the information.
>
> Mike M
>

Labeling the receptacle is a great idea! It's easy to take the cover off
and check for an ID then turn the breaker box off. I'm never sure if the
breaker will turn off the stairway light as well as the basement lights,
but if the receptacle was marked I'd know for sure. (Naturally, I'd
still test. It'd just save me a few trips to the breaker box.)

Puckdropper
--
Never teach your apprentice everything you know.

MM

Mike M

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 9:50 PM

19/03/2010 8:24 PM

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:48:18 -0400, Bill <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Mike M wrote:
>
> Just remember
>> to protect the wiring if your using sheathed cable or anything that
>> could be punctured by a screw or nail.
>
>
>I'll have to read up on the right way to approach this. Thank you for
>mentioning it! To me %-), It seems like the best protection is to know
>where the wires are. I read a suggestion somewhere to "sketch the
>layout of the wires". What sort of protection are you thinking of--I
>assume something that would lie in the attic rather than through the studs?
>
>Thank you,
>Bill

Like dpb said they make a nail plate. If you have 2x6 studs the
center should be ok. Its also a code thing for 2x4's. On commercial
jobs we labeled every box with what panel it was fed from and which
circuits are in it.. Reommend the same for your shop. You can skip
the panel id as you'll know it but labeling the breaker number on a
receptacle can save you time. Used to do a lot of work for Kenworth
truck and they maintained a cad drawing of the entire electrical
system. We were assigned circuits and panels for what we were
installing and labeled every junction box with the information.

Mike M

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 9:50 PM

20/03/2010 8:58 AM

On 3/20/2010 1:25 AM, Bill wrote:

>
> I thought it was extremely valuable to learn that nail plates were a code
> issue on 2 by 4 studs.

There is really no need for you to do it ... I'm with Mike Marlow,
you're are getting a bit too much unnecessary information here.

Itt is simply not a code issue as long as the hole for the wire is
drilled through the middle of the 2x4 stud face.

In residential construction nail plates' are used ONLY where plumbing
and HVAC pipes run through the studs and then are only required when the
pipe is not set back 1 1/4" from the edge of the stud.

This rarely done with electrical wires, and I mean so rarely that it is
in the unicorn sighting category.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 9:50 PM

20/03/2010 2:25 AM


"Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Mike M wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:48:18 -0400, Bill <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mike M wrote:
>>>
>>> Just remember
>>>> to protect the wiring if your using sheathed cable or anything that
>>>> could be punctured by a screw or nail.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll have to read up on the right way to approach this. Thank you for
>>> mentioning it! To me %-), It seems like the best protection is to
>>> know where the wires are. I read a suggestion somewhere to "sketch
>>> the
>>> layout of the wires". What sort of protection are you thinking of--I
>>> assume something that would lie in the attic rather than through the
>>> studs?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Bill
>>
>> Like dpb said they make a nail plate. If you have 2x6 studs the
>> center should be ok. Its also a code thing for 2x4's. On commercial
>> jobs we labeled every box with what panel it was fed from and which
>> circuits are in it.. Reommend the same for your shop. You can skip
>> the panel id as you'll know it but labeling the breaker number on a
>> receptacle can save you time. Used to do a lot of work for Kenworth
>> truck and they maintained a cad drawing of the entire electrical
>> system. We were assigned circuits and panels for what we were
>> installing and labeled every junction box with the information.
>>
>> Mike M
>
> Oye!!! Guys - we're talking about a very simple residental wiring job
> here. Sure - we can all come up with great ideas that should grace the
> pages of Popular Electricity, but this is a basic home wiring job.
> There's lots of ways to convince a homeowner to overcomplicate a job, and
> we're hitting most of them.


I thought it was extremely valuable to learn that nail plates were a code
issue
on 2 by 4 studs. I thought the documentation techniques were interesting
too.
Someone use to say, and I think correctly, that "the devil is in the
details..."
I wish to thank everyone, including Mike Marlow, for helping to teach me so
much about wiring this week! But please don't stop the thread because you
feel
it's over my head--when words are used that I don't know, I often look them
up.

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 9:50 PM

20/03/2010 2:34 PM


"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 3/20/2010 1:25 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>>
>> I thought it was extremely valuable to learn that nail plates were a code
>> issue on 2 by 4 studs.
>
> There is really no need for you to do it ... I'm with Mike Marlow, you're
> are getting a bit too much unnecessary information here.
>
> Itt is simply not a code issue as long as the hole for the wire is drilled
> through the middle of the 2x4 stud face.
>
> In residential construction nail plates' are used ONLY where plumbing and
> HVAC pipes run through the studs and then are only required when the pipe
> is not set back 1 1/4" from the edge of the stud.
>
> This rarely done with electrical wires, and I mean so rarely that it is in
> the unicorn sighting category.
>

Thank you for the clarification regarding code.
Can't know enough about the NEC, huh? : )

> --
> www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 10/22/08
> KarlC@ (the obvious)

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 10:28 PM


"Bob AZ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:a8f12aed-6573-43cc-9c41-11f4bcd302da@l12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...


> >> You are right about the 240v being, essentially, two 120v lines.
> >> ?Unlike
> >> 120V, which has a Hot, Common and Ground, the 240 has (or can run on) 2
> >> Hot and a Ground/Common. ...
>
> > To clarify for OP what could be misinterpreted given it appears little
> > or
> > no familiarity exists...240V has _only_ two 120V 'hots' and an
> > associated
> > ground, _no_ neutral.

I'm sorry MS-Outlook6 does such a poor job of formatting my reply. I typed
after
the dashes.




Too much in your message(s) to really make meaningful/rational
comments.

So please get some more learning.

Also be aware that the RV power you mention is probably 30 or 50 amp
power. Sure it is 240 volt? And too small for the shop enviorment you
mention.

-------------
I just went and looked at it with a flashlight--125v, 30-Amps, "for
Travel-trailer
use only". The plug shape made me think it was 220...
Maybe the line would be suitable for a dedicated DC. I need to learn more
about that outlet.



Where and how 240 volts is sourced to the consumer, has been mentioned
here, but the details that transform the high voltage on the power
pole or in the power vault that is near you property line is more
complex than what has been mentioned here.

----
Yes, I know little more than that I have a 3 year old (due to hail damage)
200 amp service
and a 220 with 50 amp breakers, which was used for welding (which I assume
suggests
a certain level of integrity).



If you add a power (sub)panel that is sourced from your service panel
remember that are limitations in the code. The neutral and the ground
need to be separate and not connected circuits.

---
Bob, I had not thought of adding a subpanel. I will need to learn more
about the implications of that.
Thank you for your reply. -Bil.





Bob AZ

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 9:29 PM

Bill wrote:
> "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
...

>> Nope ... most 220/240v woodworking tools in North America only need a
>> total of 3 wires to both work properly and comply with code.
>>
>
>
>> The three wires needed for 220/240v operation are: Two hot wires (one from
>> each hot leg of the service/sub panel), and one ground wire. The ground
>> wire, while not necessary to power the equipment, is necessary for safety
>> and code compliance.
>
> Isn't the ground, then, "completing the circuit" in this case?


_NO!!!_

That's what I said earlier and Swing just reiterated -- the ground for a
240V-only motor/appliance/heater/whatever is _purely_ a safety ground.
Remove it and the operation of the device will be totally unaffected.
The only purpose it serves is to ground the case in the event of a fault
that would somehow otherwise energize it.

The circuit is completed between the two legs -- remember, this is AC
and my description of the way in which the voltages are generated as
being tapped from different points on the transformer so one leg is
positive while the other is negative (at the peaks, since the driving
voltage is a sine wave they're both varying continuously but always with
this same 180-degree lag of one relative to the other). Owing to that,
one is always positive with respect to the other (except at the instant
of crossing, of course, and w/ a varying amplitude that is in RMS terms
the 240V) and the current flows from the higher to the lower thru the
device, the direction and magnitude at any time depending on that
varying potential and the load characteristics. Hence the ground in the
240V-only case never sees any current flow at all and can be dispensed
with except for the safety reasons.

The difference is in the split-voltage 120/240V case where there's a
device of both voltages on three-wire service. Then, since the 120V
device _does_ have to have a return, the ground conductor also serves
that role. As noted earlier, that is what the NEC has now outlawed
requiring 4-conductor service to keep the 120V neutral and the safety
ground separate to serve their individual functions.

>
>
> BTW, I noticed that my outlet on the outside has a single 30 Amp breaker
> and that the interior one has a double 50-Amp breaker (s). The 30 Amp one
> on the outside
> was used by the previously owner for his RV and the interior one for
> welding.
>
> My biggest tool will be a 3HP TS which Grizzly suggests a 20 Amp circuit
> for. My thought was to
> put a Delta 1.5 HP DC on the 30 Amp line and a series of outlets along a
> wall that would support
> other 220v machinery (including the TS). It seems like the 50-Amp circuit
> would support several machines, one-at-a-time,
> with the possible future attachment of things like a heater, for example,
> later if desired.
...

The 50A service is more than adequate for everything you'll likely ever
have in the shop (other than perhaps if you add a bunch of electric
heat). The rub is, Code won't allow putting a 20A or 30A outlet on a
circuit protected for more than the rating of the outlet (for obvious
reasons if you think about it (and this is one that I _wouldn't_ break
despite my previous comments :) ) ).

I don't know if you could find 50A standard configuration 240V outlets;
would doubt it. OTOMH, the options I'd see would be

a) Swap the 50A breaker for the rating of outlet(s) you want to use
(Code is happy if conductors are larger than allowed minimums for any
given size breaker),

b) Put in a small subpanel to feed the convenience outlets and wire them
w/ 10g or whatever is appropriate for the chosen feeder breaker for the
subcircuit

--

LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

17/03/2010 5:14 AM


"Mike M" wrote:
> GE makes whats called a peanut breaker where two breakers fit in a
> 1"
> space. This allows a two pole breaker to hit a single phase.
---------------------------
That would be a THQP c'bkr which is fully rated.

It DOES NOT allow a THQP2## c'bkr to be incorrectly installed in a GE
load center.

Lew


LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

17/03/2010 6:30 PM

"Swingman" wrote:

> I've got a lot of respect for your electrical knowledge, but you do
> need to try this before you continue on with this contention ... as
> you said yourself, Lew ... it's been 28 years and things change.
----------------------------------------------
Ya made me do it.

Got up off my dead and dying and found a Lowes in the hood that
stocked GE load centers and c'bkrs.

Home Depot around here does not stock GE load centers.

Grabbed a TLM1212 load center(125 MLO, 12-1 or 24-12") on a bench
along with a THQP220 c'bkr.(2P-20A, 1" wide module).

No way can the mechanical interlock system be defeated to allow a
THQP220 to be fully seated in an incorrect position of a TLM1212,
short of using a 4# drill hammer to coax things along which in the
process creates a pile of junk.

Just for funzies, got a Murray/Seimens out and tried a THQP220.

Forget it.

A THQL c'bkr MAY fit a Murray, but a THQP definitely will not

I will grant you that it may appear that a THQP may be installed
incorrectly, however, it WILL NOT fully seat to make correct contact,
thus it is an incomplete installation.

Being able to only install a THQP2## correctly in a GE load center was
a sales feature 40 years ago, and still is today.

Don't know what hardware you have, but something isn't Kosher.

Lew


LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

17/03/2010 11:03 PM


"Swingman" wrote:

> Sorry you wasted your time by arbitrarily deciding to settle on a
> dubious experiment with _one_ panel on a shelf at Lowes to prove
> your point.
>
> But that's what it was, a waste of time.
>
> Read the following, which CLEARLY addresses my point, _without
> question_.
>
> Note the first paragraph, which states EXACTLY what I've been saying
> (and which you have erroneously taken exception to).
>
> Carefully note the SOLUTION to the problem, which again CLEARLY
> supports my previous statements in that regard.
>
> Once again, Lew, and despite your contention, this is NOT an
> uncommon occurrence:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ygfgzpg
>
> It'll be interesting to see if you can find a way to continue to
> argue an untenable position ...
--------------------------------------------
Don't have a problem with a test sample size of one for a product that
hasn't had a design change in over 40 years.

I basically don't have a problem with what is basically anecdotal the
evidence stated in the article; however, none of it applies to the GE
product line.

The article comes down on the side of not trying to use a pair of 1
pole c'bkrs and a handle tie for a 240V application since it can
squarely bite you in the ass.

Part of the prevention of incorrect c'bkr location has to do with how
the c'bkr contacts the bus.

A THQL (1") utilizes a horizontal bus connection while the THQP (1/2")
utilizes a vertical bus connection which eliminates most non GE panels
from accepting THQP c'bkrs.

As I said earlier, ya can't get there from here.

Lew



LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

18/03/2010 9:26 AM


"Swingman" wrote:

> Lew ... I want to apologize to you for the "tone" in this post and
> the direction it's been taking. I regretted the escalation the
> second I hit the send button.
>
> Though I have to disagree on this particular issue, I've nothing but
> the utmost respect for your knowledge and experience.
>
> mea culpa ...
>
> BTW, this does NOT apply to politics! <g,d & r> :)
----------------------------------------
Accepted as given.

NBD, I chalk it up to your "Big Bad Wolf" mode.

Sometimes you huff and you puff...........

Lew



LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

18/03/2010 9:31 AM


"Swingman" wrote:

> You've gone from a blanket statement that it can't be done, to a
> blanket statement that it can't be done with a specific brand.
----------------------------
My comments were always based on GE product.

Other than GE, how many manufacturers of half size c'bkrs are there?

BTW, Square D is a stand alone since they are unique unto themselves.

Lew


Sk

Swingman

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

18/03/2010 8:51 AM

On 3/18/2010 1:03 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote:

>> A 2P c'bkr has a built in key that prohibits installing the c'bkr in
>> an improper location.

> I basically don't have a problem with what is basically anecdotal the
> evidence stated in the article; however, none of it applies to the GE
> product line.

You've gone from a blanket statement that it can't be done, to a blanket
statement that it can't be done with a specific brand.

Like I said before, Lew - I have nothing but respect for your knowledge
and experience with electrical matters, but I've personally experienced,
firsthand, that neither of your contentions are entirely correct.

Looks like we'll have to leave it at that ...

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

18/03/2010 11:36 AM

On 3/18/2010 11:26 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
> "Swingman" wrote:
>
>> Lew ... I want to apologize to you for the "tone" in this post and
>> the direction it's been taking. I regretted the escalation the
>> second I hit the send button.
>>
>> Though I have to disagree on this particular issue, I've nothing but
>> the utmost respect for your knowledge and experience.
>>
>> mea culpa ...
>>
>> BTW, this does NOT apply to politics!<g,d& r> :)
> ----------------------------------------
> Accepted as given.
>
> NBD, I chalk it up to your "Big Bad Wolf" mode.
>
> Sometimes you huff and you puff...........

LOL ... I know a certain blond that would agree with you without
reservation. :)


--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

17/03/2010 7:50 AM

On 3/17/2010 3:32 AM, Mike M wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:36:47 -0500, Swingman<[email protected]> wrote:

>> There may be one advantage (albeit slight) to wiring a "dedicated
>> circuit" for a stationary tool, particularly in shops in "garages" ... a
>> "dedicated circuit" is exempt from being GFCI protected in many locales.
>>
>> At one time in the early days of GFCI, it was worth doing so as to not
>> have to deal with nuisance trips, which are no longer the problem they
>> once were.
>
> You may be spot on this. I only do commercial industrial so I'm not
> right up on residential but I believe all garage circuits require gfi.
> There are exceptions for appliances and dedicated circuits. May be a
> drawback garage shops, but I think most repair shops are now required
> to have gfi circuits.

We are required in most municipalities where I build to have GFI
protection on all "wet area" receptacles ... this includes bathroom,
utility rooms with sinks, kitchens, garages, sun rooms with drains, and
all exterior receptacles.

We are also required to have AFCI protection on all dwelling bedroom
circuits.

On the latter, I've had homeowners who are selling a home I built when
AFCI wasn't required, or even available, and during the sale process
failed a buyer's third party inspection because lack of AFCI protection,
I've gone back and had the electrical contractor install them at our
cost ... seems like good business, and a prudent thing to do in this
litigious society.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

17/03/2010 11:17 PM

On 3/17/2010 8:30 PM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
> "Swingman" wrote:
>
>> > I've got a lot of respect for your electrical knowledge, but you do
>> > need to try this before you continue on with this contention ... as
>> > you said yourself, Lew ... it's been 28 years and things change.
> ----------------------------------------------
> Ya made me do it.
>
> Got up off my dead and dying and found a Lowes in the hood that
> stocked GE load centers and c'bkrs.
>
> Home Depot around here does not stock GE load centers.
>
> Grabbed a TLM1212 load center(125 MLO, 12-1 or 24-12") on a bench
> along with a THQP220 c'bkr.(2P-20A, 1" wide module).
>
> No way can the mechanical interlock system be defeated to allow a
> THQP220 to be fully seated in an incorrect position of a TLM1212,
> short of using a 4# drill hammer to coax things along which in the
> process creates a pile of junk.
>
> Just for funzies, got a Murray/Seimens out and tried a THQP220.
>
> Forget it.
>
> A THQL c'bkr MAY fit a Murray, but a THQP definitely will not
>
> I will grant you that it may appear that a THQP may be installed
> incorrectly, however, it WILL NOT fully seat to make correct contact,
> thus it is an incomplete installation.
>
> Being able to only install a THQP2## correctly in a GE load center was
> a sales feature 40 years ago, and still is today.
>
> Don't know what hardware you have, but something isn't Kosher.

Sorry you wasted your time by arbitrarily deciding to settle on a
dubious experiment with _one_ panel on a shelf at Lowes to prove your point.

But that's what it was, a waste of time.

Read the following, which CLEARLY addresses my point, _without question_.

Note the first paragraph, which states EXACTLY what I've been saying
(and which you have erroneously taken exception to).

Carefully note the SOLUTION to the problem, which again CLEARLY supports
my previous statements in that regard.

Once again, Lew, and despite your contention, this is NOT an uncommon
occurrence:

http://tinyurl.com/ygfgzpg

It'll be interesting to see if you can find a way to continue to argue
an untenable position ...

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

18/03/2010 10:53 AM

On 3/17/2010 11:17 PM, Swingman wrote:

> Sorry you wasted your time by arbitrarily deciding to settle on a
> dubious experiment with _one_ panel on a shelf at Lowes to prove your
> point.

Lew ... I want to apologize to you for the "tone" in this post and the
direction it's been taking. I regretted the escalation the second I hit
the send button.

Though I have to disagree on this particular issue, I've nothing but the
utmost respect for your knowledge and experience.

mea culpa ...

BTW, this does NOT apply to politics! <g,d & r> :)

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

Mike M

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

17/03/2010 1:06 AM

On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:33:17 -0500, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 3/16/2010 6:41 PM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
>> "Swingman" wrote:
>>
>>> Not necessarily with all brands ... I'm looking at a box of NEW GE
>>> 2p's from HD that will fit in any two slots in a 12/24 panel.
>>>
>>> Absolutely no doubt about it ...
>> ----------------------------------
>> Go back and check those GE c'bkrs again.
>>
>> If they fit, they have made a MAJOR design since I was involved with
>> them.
>>
>> Makes no difference whether they are 2P full size or 2P half size
>> c'bkr modules, they both have a common internal trip and a mechanical
>> interlock to prevent insertion into an incorrect location.
>>
>> BTW, should see the words "common internal trip" molded into the case
>> of a 2P device.
>
>I'm not at the shop right now but I already know that I'm absolutely
>certain about this ... did it personally when I installed the sub-panel
>in the old shop; and have had it happen two other times in new houses in
>contractor installed panels; there is no doubt whatsoever about that.
>
>My shop has a GE panel, not sure about the other two.
>
>Doing remodels I've had to chase down compatible c'bkr too many times to
>know that all of them are not created equal and aren't interchangeable
>from panel to panel for the most part ... how long has it been since
>you've been "involved with them"?

GE makes whats called a peanut breaker where two breakers fit in a 1"
space. This allows a two pole breaker to hit a single phase.

Mike M

MM

Mike M

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

17/03/2010 1:32 AM

On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:36:47 -0500, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 3/16/2010 9:12 AM, dpb wrote:
>
>> And a separate circuit for every stationary tool unless you're a
>> production shop w/ an employee at every workstation continuously through
>> a shift is _WAY_ over the top overkill...
>
>There may be one advantage (albeit slight) to wiring a "dedicated
>circuit" for a stationary tool, particularly in shops in "garages" ... a
>"dedicated circuit" is exempt from being GFCI protected in many locales.
>
>At one time in the early days of GFCI, it was worth doing so as to not
>have to deal with nuisance trips, which are no longer the problem they
>once were.

You may be spot on this. I only do commercial industrial so I'm not
right up on residential but I believe all garage circuits require gfi.
There are exceptions for appliances and dedicated circuits. May be a
drawback garage shops, but I think most repair shops are now required
to have gfi circuits.
Mike M

Sk

Swingman

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

17/03/2010 7:32 AM

On 3/17/2010 7:14 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
> "Mike M" wrote:
>> GE makes whats called a peanut breaker where two breakers fit in a
>> 1"
>> space. This allows a two pole breaker to hit a single phase.
> ---------------------------
> That would be a THQP c'bkr which is fully rated.
>
> It DOES NOT allow a THQP2## c'bkr to be incorrectly installed in a GE
> load center.

I've got a lot of respect for your electrical knowledge, but you do need
to try this before you continue on with this contention ... as you said
yourself, Lew ... it's been 28 years and things change.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to dpb on 14/03/2010 9:29 PM

17/03/2010 6:34 AM

On 3/17/2010 3:06 AM, Mike M wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:33:17 -0500, Swingman<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 3/16/2010 6:41 PM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>> "Swingman" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not necessarily with all brands ... I'm looking at a box of NEW GE
>>>> 2p's from HD that will fit in any two slots in a 12/24 panel.
>>>>
>>>> Absolutely no doubt about it ...
>>> ----------------------------------
>>> Go back and check those GE c'bkrs again.
>>>
>>> If they fit, they have made a MAJOR design since I was involved with
>>> them.
>>>
>>> Makes no difference whether they are 2P full size or 2P half size
>>> c'bkr modules, they both have a common internal trip and a mechanical
>>> interlock to prevent insertion into an incorrect location.
>>>
>>> BTW, should see the words "common internal trip" molded into the case
>>> of a 2P device.
>>
>> I'm not at the shop right now but I already know that I'm absolutely
>> certain about this ... did it personally when I installed the sub-panel
>> in the old shop; and have had it happen two other times in new houses in
>> contractor installed panels; there is no doubt whatsoever about that.
>>
>> My shop has a GE panel, not sure about the other two.
>>
>> Doing remodels I've had to chase down compatible c'bkr too many times to
>> know that all of them are not created equal and aren't interchangeable
>>from panel to panel for the most part ... how long has it been since
>> you've been "involved with them"?
>
> GE makes whats called a peanut breaker where two breakers fit in a 1"
> space. This allows a two pole breaker to hit a single phase.

http://tinyurl.com/yg6wv5g


--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 9:31 PM

...
> Where and how 240 volts is sourced to the consumer, has been mentioned
> here, but the details that transform the high voltage on the power
> pole or in the power vault that is near you property line is more
> complex than what has been mentioned here.
...
But those details are of absolutely no concern for the subject. The
level of detail that explains what he has at his panel is more than
adequate for now...

--

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 11:04 PM


"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Bill wrote:
>> "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
> ...
>
>>> Nope ... most 220/240v woodworking tools in North America only need a
>>> total of 3 wires to both work properly and comply with code.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> The three wires needed for 220/240v operation are: Two hot wires (one
>>> from each hot leg of the service/sub panel), and one ground wire. The
>>> ground wire, while not necessary to power the equipment, is necessary
>>> for safety and code compliance.
>>
>> Isn't the ground, then, "completing the circuit" in this case?
>
>
> _NO!!!_
>

Okay, I got it now! I think we only studied DC circuits in electronics
class in H.S. ; )
I didn't realize the elevated-sophistication of 240v power compared to
120v...


> The 50A service is more than adequate for everything you'll likely ever
> have in the shop (other than perhaps if you add a bunch of electric heat).
> The rub is, Code won't allow putting a 20A or 30A outlet on a circuit
> protected for more than the rating of the outlet (for obvious reasons if
> you think about it (and this is one that I _wouldn't_ break despite my
> previous comments :) ) ).
>
> I don't know if you could find 50A standard configuration 240V outlets;
> would doubt it. OTOMH, the options I'd see would be
>
> a) Swap the 50A breaker for the rating of outlet(s) you want to use (Code
> is happy if conductors are larger than allowed minimums for any given size
> breaker),
>
> b) Put in a small subpanel to feed the convenience outlets and wire them
> w/ 10g or whatever is appropriate for the chosen feeder breaker for the
> subcircuit
>

I like option (b) if I can power the subpanel with the 50 amp line. Thank
you for pointing
out the issue beween the 240V outlets and the 50A power line. I'll take a
really close
look at what type of outlet is on it now (and I'm not sure if welders use a
special 50A outlet or not).

Thank you for your help!
Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 11:26 PM


>>My current interior 220v outlet is currently pretty close to the floor.
>>Does the electrical "code" cite a minimum for that?
>
> If it's there, leave it. Does it get wet?

It's just 6" off of the ground. It doesn't get wet.


>
>>BTW, I currently have 3 36" neon lamps..I think I'm going to have 6.
>>Plugs
>>in the ceiling would be convenient..
>
> Fluorescent?

Yes, What a strangely spelled word (I checked)!

--Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 12:12 AM


"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The 50A service is more than adequate for everything you'll likely ever
> have in the shop (other than perhaps if you add a bunch of electric heat).
> The rub is, Code won't allow putting a 20A or 30A outlet on a circuit
> protected for more than the rating of the outlet (for obvious reasons if
> you think about it (and this is one that I _wouldn't_ break despite my
> previous comments :) ) ).
>
> I don't know if you could find 50A standard configuration 240V outlets;
> would doubt it. OTOMH, the options I'd see would be
>
> a) Swap the 50A breaker for the rating of outlet(s) you want to use (Code
> is happy if conductors are larger than allowed minimums for any given size
> breaker),
>
> b) Put in a small subpanel to feed the convenience outlets and wire them
> w/ 10g or whatever is appropriate for the chosen feeder breaker for the
> subcircuit


dbp,

Following up on your hints, I came to learn that a service outlet offering
240v
50A service is different than one offering 20A or even 15A service (although
the 20A outlet, 6-20 is compatible with 6-15). The Grizzly G-0690 TS I am
considering has a 6-20 plug (NEMA 6-20P). ; )

What a day.

Is there a rule that says a subpanel has to be a very short distance from
the main panel? I would position it about 10 feet away if I could.

Is anything (code) likely to prevent me from doing what I want with 15A and
20A
120v and 240v circuits from a subpanel (like having 10 of them)? As you
mentioned earlier,
I'm likely to stay far below the 50A threshold in terms of actual usage.

Thank you for the lesson!
Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 1:57 AM


"Nonny" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Just as a FWIW, let me admit to a minor boondoggle I did long ago. Let's
> just say that I have a bit of experience as an electrician wiring homes in
> the 60's, as a builder and as a woodworker. However, I can also screw up
> and am not ashamed to admit it.
>
> When I wired my own shop, I pulled in a 60a line to a load center in my
> shop from my main household breaker box. I then got a 6-circuit little
> load center box and connected it up without much thought. The box had 3
> breakouts on the left and 3 breakouts on the right. It was only when I
> began installing some tools that it hit me like a ton of rocks: that's
> just 2 normal DP bakersre and 2 SP breakers. In my own case, it was a
> simple task to pull out the little box and substitute in a 12 circuit box
> with 6 knockouts on each side. The little box became a load center on one
> of the attics.
>
> --
> Nonny
> When we talk to God, we're praying,
> but when God talks to us,
> we're schizophrenic.
> What's the deal?
>

Nonny, Thank you for saving me from learning that lesson the hard way!

Here is a relavant DIY-type link I found, in case anyone else is interested:

http://www.hammerzone.com/archives/elect/panel/sub_panel/01/new.htm

Bill

Bill

MM

Mike M

in reply to "Bill" on 15/03/2010 1:57 AM

17/03/2010 4:21 PM

I can see where thats good business. The more people that have
something good to say about how you do business is good for repeat and
referal customers. A good reputation leads to a lot more negotiated
business and being able to sell on quality and fair price instead of
just cheap.

Mike M


On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:50:36 -0500, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 3/17/2010 3:32 AM, Mike M wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:36:47 -0500, Swingman<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> There may be one advantage (albeit slight) to wiring a "dedicated
>>> circuit" for a stationary tool, particularly in shops in "garages" ... a
>>> "dedicated circuit" is exempt from being GFCI protected in many locales.
>>>
>>> At one time in the early days of GFCI, it was worth doing so as to not
>>> have to deal with nuisance trips, which are no longer the problem they
>>> once were.
>>
>> You may be spot on this. I only do commercial industrial so I'm not
>> right up on residential but I believe all garage circuits require gfi.
>> There are exceptions for appliances and dedicated circuits. May be a
>> drawback garage shops, but I think most repair shops are now required
>> to have gfi circuits.
>
>We are required in most municipalities where I build to have GFI
>protection on all "wet area" receptacles ... this includes bathroom,
>utility rooms with sinks, kitchens, garages, sun rooms with drains, and
>all exterior receptacles.
>
>We are also required to have AFCI protection on all dwelling bedroom
>circuits.
>
>On the latter, I've had homeowners who are selling a home I built when
>AFCI wasn't required, or even available, and during the sale process
>failed a buyer's third party inspection because lack of AFCI protection,
>I've gone back and had the electrical contractor install them at our
>cost ... seems like good business, and a prudent thing to do in this
>litigious society.

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 9:30 AM

Bill wrote:
...

> Is there a rule that says a subpanel has to be a very short distance from
> the main panel? I would position it about 10 feet away if I could.

That's cool...

> Is anything (code) likely to prevent me from doing what I want with 15A and
> 20A 120v and 240v circuits from a subpanel (like having 10 of them)? As you
> mentioned earlier, I'm likely to stay far below the 50A threshold
> in terms of actual usage.

No, that's what subpanels are for -- just size it for the number of
circuits of the type you want/need and make it's service breaker the
same or smaller than the feed. If it's close enough, you can (I think)
get by w/o the local breaker/disconnect but it's certainly more
convenient and I'd likely not scrimp...

Good luck, it ain't rocket science; most of the Code is simply
formalizing what is common sense; it just takes somebody to point out
what that commonsense is for the first time and NEC is the standard.
The self-help books are pretty good in general at separating the code
legalese and turning that into what actually needs doing...

--

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 4:04 PM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/15/2010 11:00 AM, Robatoy wrote:
>
>> I think he should do what Lew said to do.
>
> Y'all go ahead and laugh, now! :)
>
> I don't think it is apparent to the average person just how much
> experience and knowledge is behind that information, particularly with
> regard to the sub panel choice/type.
>
> Trial and error on this issue can cost the neophyte beaucoup $$ ...
>



Okay, Okay, I WILL DO as Lew suggested--and gladly too! : ) : )

He wrote:

Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
a 2P-30A, non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool.


Question: So this redundancy is a good idea for 240v tools, but is not
as important for ones powered at 120v (which are even more likely to be
powered by conventional outlets wired in a series)?

Thank you,
Bill

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

15/03/2010 5:01 PM

Thanks Hoosierpopi!

Hoosierpopi wrote:
> 1. Never enough outlets.
>
> a) Try running 12/3 or to all you outlets, isolating the top from
> the bottom and adding a switch to the bottom outlets if not to top and
> bottom. This will allow you to leave those wall transformers plugged
> in 24/7, but turn off power to them when you leave the shop.

For extra measure of safety?


>
> b) Duplex outlets in the ceiling can serve ideally for the four
> foot fluorescent "shop lamps" sold at Lowes, HD, etc for about $9. And
> you can do the switched approach on these as well in case you have a
> need for a DROP CORD approach to a tool - assuming your shop would not
> be usable with the lights off e.g. nto enough window area to let in
> sufficient daylight for working.

Yes, I like this idea. Switches here make good sense. I'd use more
overhead-lights except that electric garage door opens right to the
ceiling and the pull-down "stairway to the attic" blocks another good
location for a light fixture.


>
> 2. The wall on the house side might prove a treasure trove of points
> to secure power, telephone line, cable TV, water, sewer access. Is the
> floor of the shop even with that of the house/kitchen? Hey, how about
> a shop sink/eyewash station replete with drain?
>

You are right. It's a shame not to have (more than 1) outlet on that
wall. The opposing wall I can tear down, and no one will care. The
kitchen wall is sure to be full of insulation--and if it's insulated
like the attic, it will be "full of fluff/lint" that looks like it came
out of a vacuum cleaner. What do you think of the idea of cutting
a 8" opening most of the length of the wallboard to install several
electric boxes, and then replacing it?

I'd like to add outlets outside the garage too... As long as I'm making
a mess, I may as well make it a big one! ; )

Thanks,
Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 1:26 AM


"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Lowest cost, highest flexibility as follows:
>
> 125A MLO (Main Lug Only) 12/24 (12-1" poles/24;1/2" poles)
> Load Center equipped with a 2P-60A Main c'bkr kit, neutral bar,
> and insulated ground bar.
>
> The above has enough capacity for almost any shop including
> a fairly good sized commercial shop.
>
> Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
> a 2P-30A, non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool.
>
> If you are going to work on a tool, padlock the disconnect switch
> in the OFF position with a padlock that has only ONE KEY,
> which is in your pocket.
>
> The above is a standard industrial safety practice.
>
> Simple, neat, and low cost.
>
> Lew


Some of what I've learned since I read Lew's post the first time:

Evidentally, a load center is "Main Lug Only" when it doesn't have
it's own main breaker like the primary load center would probably have.

Load Units, such as made by Eator Cutler-Hammer use descriptions such as "12
spaces, 24 circuits".
If I learned part of my lesson yesterday, the only way you'd get 24 circuits
would be to use 1 Hot
and a 1 Common for every circuit. Is it typical for someone put two such
circuits under a single breaker--probably
not in a shop environment, huh? Even "lighting" seem too important to mess
around with.

So you use 2 spaces for a 2P-30A branch For Each 240v stationary tool in the
load center. So with four 240v tools
one is basically left with room for 4 or 8 120v lines. This raises the
question: Which is better--two circuits with 1 outlet each from 1 breaker or
one circuit with 2 outlets on one breaker? I think the former--for the
same reason Lew only wants one 240v tool on each line. This creates a new
question for me: in what sense does a 15A breaker support two different
circuits? Specifically, does
it only support the sum of the amperages of the two circuits?

I try to learn Something New everyday. Today was certainly no exception!
: )
Got to hit the hay for tomorrow's another day!

Bill



MM

Mike M

in reply to "Bill" on 16/03/2010 1:26 AM

17/03/2010 4:37 PM

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:32:34 -0500, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 3/17/2010 7:14 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
>> "Mike M" wrote:
>>> GE makes whats called a peanut breaker where two breakers fit in a
>>> 1"
>>> space. This allows a two pole breaker to hit a single phase.
>> ---------------------------
>> That would be a THQP c'bkr which is fully rated.
>>
>> It DOES NOT allow a THQP2## c'bkr to be incorrectly installed in a GE
>> load center.
>
>I've got a lot of respect for your electrical knowledge, but you do need
>to try this before you continue on with this contention ... as you said
>yourself, Lew ... it's been 28 years and things change.

Rereading and noting its not the peanut breaker, I'm scratching my
head. Want to agree with Lew, but have learned never to say never.
Next time I"m in HD if I remember I'll take a peak.

Mike M

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 9:12 AM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/15/2010 3:04 PM, Bill wrote:
>
>> Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
>> a 2P-30A, non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool.
>>
>>
>> Question: So this redundancy is a good idea for 240v tools, but is not
>> as important for ones powered at 120v (which are even more likely to be
>> powered by conventional outlets wired in a series)?
>
> You really don't need to install a disconnect for a dedicated circuit to
> each machine in your home shop.
...

And a separate circuit for every stationary tool unless you're a
production shop w/ an employee at every workstation continuously through
a shift is _WAY_ over the top overkill...

For a home, casual-use workshop as I gather this is, one or perhaps two
30A 240V circuits will be enough w/ outlets judiciously placed for the
major equipment you now have and some consideration given to what you
think you may want to add in the foreseeable future. You, as an
individual can never be using more than one at a time so, other than the
one tool, the only other loads active simultaneously will be the
potential DC and maybe a compressor.

Circuits for electric heat, etc., should, of course, be separate.

The "non fused disconnect" at each tool is, in ordinary terms, the plug
on the end of the power cord.

--

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 11:37 AM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 9:12 AM, dpb wrote:
>
>> And a separate circuit for every stationary tool unless you're a
>> production shop w/ an employee at every workstation continuously through
>> a shift is _WAY_ over the top overkill...
>
> There may be one advantage (albeit slight) to wiring a "dedicated
> circuit" for a stationary tool, particularly in shops in "garages" ... a
> "dedicated circuit" is exempt from being GFCI protected in many locales.
>
> At one time in the early days of GFCI, it was worth doing so as to not
> have to deal with nuisance trips, which are no longer the problem they
> once were.

That _is_ one of the later NEC items I do tend to ignore in
non-wet/indoor locations like a shop...probably the most common one , in
fact. :)

Bill should, of course, follow local Code requirements (disclaimer :) )

--

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 12:40 PM

Dave In Texas wrote:

> 12 or 15 years ago I finally got around to putting in a dedicated
> circuit for my kitchen refrigerator. Only I plugged that 20 amp single
> pole into one leg of the three phase. WOW! You can't believe how
> bright a 15 watt appliance bulb can get. The freezer fan was the only
> casualty. Fortunately I had an appliance repair man that made Sunday
> house calls. And, that side-by-side Kenmore lasted 20+ years.
>
> Dave in Houston

That reminds me of when, in my wee years, I made a "single-bulb x-mas
light bulb tester". 110v is just too much for one of those little
guys... Of course, it worked. ; )

Bill

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 12:48 PM

Bill wrote:
> Dave In Texas wrote:
>
>> 12 or 15 years ago I finally got around to putting in a dedicated
>> circuit for my kitchen refrigerator. Only I plugged that 20 amp
>> single pole into one leg of the three phase. WOW! You can't believe
>> how bright a 15 watt appliance bulb can get. The freezer fan was the
>> only casualty. Fortunately I had an appliance repair man that made
>> Sunday house calls. And, that side-by-side Kenmore lasted 20+ years.
>>
>> Dave in Houston
>
> That reminds me of when, in my wee years, I made a "single-bulb x-mas
> light bulb tester". 110v is just too much for one of those little
> guys... Of course, it worked. ; )


In case I was too subtle, the bulbs that don't blow up in your face are
bad! : )


>
> Bill

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 12:53 PM

dpb wrote:
> Swingman wrote:
>> On 3/16/2010 9:12 AM, dpb wrote:
>>
>>> And a separate circuit for every stationary tool unless you're a
>>> production shop w/ an employee at every workstation continuously through
>>> a shift is _WAY_ over the top overkill...
>>
>> There may be one advantage (albeit slight) to wiring a "dedicated
>> circuit" for a stationary tool, particularly in shops in "garages" ...
>> a "dedicated circuit" is exempt from being GFCI protected in many
>> locales.
>>
>> At one time in the early days of GFCI, it was worth doing so as to not
>> have to deal with nuisance trips, which are no longer the problem they
>> once were.
>
> That _is_ one of the later NEC items I do tend to ignore in
> non-wet/indoor locations like a shop...probably the most common one , in
> fact. :)
>
> Bill should, of course, follow local Code requirements (disclaimer :) )
>

Having recently purchased my home, I think it is the case that our local
code (central IN) requires GFCI on outlets within a short distance of a
sink/bath except older homes may be grandfathered out of this
requirement. However, needless to say, I am not an expert.

Bill

en

eclipsme

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 1:34 PM

On 3/16/2010 10:12 AM, dpb wrote:
> Swingman wrote:
>
> And a separate circuit for every stationary tool unless you're a
> production shop w/ an employee at every workstation continuously through
> a shift is _WAY_ over the top overkill...
>
> For a home, casual-use workshop as I gather this is, one or perhaps two
> 30A 240V circuits will be enough w/ outlets judiciously placed for the
> major equipment you now have and some consideration given to what you
> think you may want to add in the foreseeable future. You, as an
> individual can never be using more than one at a time

just a small caveat to this statement, as I had to consider this in my
shop. Both a given power tool, perhaps the table saw, and the dust
collection system will probably be on the same time. Be sure to add both
loads together to make sure a circuit is large enough. Oh, and don't
forget that your air compressor will more than likely kick on at this
inopportune time as well.

Harvey

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 2:16 PM

eclipsme wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 10:12 AM, dpb wrote:
>> Swingman wrote:
>>
>> And a separate circuit for every stationary tool unless you're a
>> production shop w/ an employee at every workstation continuously through
>> a shift is _WAY_ over the top overkill...
>>
>> For a home, casual-use workshop as I gather this is, one or perhaps two
>> 30A 240V circuits will be enough w/ outlets judiciously placed for the
>> major equipment you now have and some consideration given to what you
>> think you may want to add in the foreseeable future. You, as an
>> individual can never be using more than one at a time
>
> just a small caveat to this statement, as I had to consider this in my
> shop. Both a given power tool, perhaps the table saw, and the dust
> collection system will probably be on the same time. Be sure to add both
> loads together to make sure a circuit is large enough. Oh, and don't
> forget that your air compressor will more than likely kick on at this
> inopportune time as well.

Uhhh, _excuse_ me??? The part you so judiciously snipped continued...

"so, other than the one tool, the only other loads active simultaneously
will be the potential DC and maybe a compressor."

For 30A/240V, 10A each will be in the neighborhood of 3hp FLA motors. I
submit for the home shop dude just getting going as is OP he'll have far
more than enough...

If'en he's going w/ 5hp PM and an Oneida central DC, well ok but I don't
get that feeling here, do you???

--

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 4:35 PM

Lew Hodgett wrote:
<snip>


> I'm not going to get into a pissing contest over a c'bkr that costs
> less than $10, but dedicating a 2P-30 c'bkr for each 240V load not
> only simplifies the installation but also allows you to isolate a
> problem load without affecting other loads.
>
...
> Lew



When the idea of adding an additional (flip) switch to each 240v circuit
was suggested that was one of my concerns--that it was something else to
go wrong, which would in turn would make it harder to isolate a problem.

I've got an inexpensive voltimeter which has worked fine for working
with 12v in the car, but I'm not sure whether it would be prudent to
plug it into a 240v outlet. I won't say I'm skeered, but I was thinking
about using it with gloves! : ) I sure believe I should test any
outlet before I plug a new $1000 tool into it.

Bill

kk

in reply to Bill on 16/03/2010 4:35 PM

17/03/2010 11:56 AM

On Mar 17, 10:31=A0am, Larry Jaques <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:14:18 -0700 (PDT), the infamous
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>
>
>
> >On Mar 17, 8:03 am, Larry Jaques <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:06:36 -0400, the infamous "Bill"
> >> <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>
> >> >"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >news:[email protected]...
> >> >> It is not that different from what can happen with a table saw. You=
never
> >> >> take your eyes off of it and be very safety conscious. I should als=
o point
> >> >> out that getting zapped with the 220 voltage is a much bigger shock=
and
> >> >> more serious than the regular 110 volts. DAMHIKT. So do exercise du=
e
> >> >> caution when working with the higher voltages.
>
> >> >No wonder I'm a GALOOT... : )
>
> >> I don't have the energy for that any more. I've become a
> >> Normanderthal, but I won't give up my ryoba or azebiki or my
> >> Satanleys.
>
> >> RE: the subject, I -prefer- getting zapped or zinged by 240. It has
> >> enough voltage to throw you off it if need be. When you touch 240, you
> >> KNOW you've been zapped, bygolly. BTW, none of my zaps has been more
> >> than a few milliseconds, and usually through nitrile gloves when
> >> working on a hot circuit. I haven't done any 240V arc welding since
> >> that little power sypply testing incident in Engineering, when I blew
> >> the 50A circuit with my screwdriver. That's one blinding flash, lemme
> >> tell ya. No, I wasn't blushing, it was sunburn. That's my story and
> >> I'm stickin' to it.
>
> >> --
> >> No matter how cynical you are, it is impossible to keep up.
> >> --Lily Tomlin
>
> >Unless you're *really* clever, there is no difference between a zap
> >off 240V and 120V (in the US). =A0It takes work to get across both
> >"hots" in a 240V circuit. =A0Don't do that!
>
> Y'mean I should quit testing for 240 voltage with my tongue? =A0Oh.
> =A0 OK.
>
Yes, that would certainly be a good idea, though I doubt you'd be able
to tell the difference. ;-)

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Bill on 16/03/2010 4:35 PM

17/03/2010 8:31 AM

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:14:18 -0700 (PDT), the infamous
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> scrawled the following:

>On Mar 17, 8:03 am, Larry Jaques <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:06:36 -0400, the infamous "Bill"
>> <[email protected]> scrawled the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> >"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >news:[email protected]...
>> >> It is not that different from what can happen with a table saw. You never
>> >> take your eyes off of it and be very safety conscious. I should also point
>> >> out that getting zapped with the 220 voltage is a much bigger shock and
>> >> more serious than the regular 110 volts. DAMHIKT. So do exercise due
>> >> caution when working with the higher voltages.
>>
>> >No wonder I'm a GALOOT...  : )
>>
>> I don't have the energy for that any more.  I've become a
>> Normanderthal, but I won't give up my ryoba or azebiki or my
>> Satanleys.
>>
>> RE: the subject, I -prefer- getting zapped or zinged by 240. It has
>> enough voltage to throw you off it if need be. When you touch 240, you
>> KNOW you've been zapped, bygolly.  BTW, none of my zaps has been more
>> than a few milliseconds, and usually through nitrile gloves when
>> working on a hot circuit. I haven't done any 240V arc welding since
>> that little power sypply testing incident in Engineering, when I blew
>> the 50A circuit with my screwdriver. That's one blinding flash, lemme
>> tell ya. No, I wasn't blushing, it was sunburn. That's my story and
>> I'm stickin' to it.
>>
>> --
>> No matter how cynical you are, it is impossible to keep up.
>>                                             --Lily Tomlin
>
>Unless you're *really* clever, there is no difference between a zap
>off 240V and 120V (in the US). It takes work to get across both
>"hots" in a 240V circuit. Don't do that!

Y'mean I should quit testing for 240 voltage with my tongue? Oh.
OK.

--
No matter how cynical you are, it is impossible to keep up.
--Lily Tomlin

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 4:50 PM

Swingman wrote:

> Besides kitchens and bathroom, most locales require GFCI protected
> circuits in "garages" also ... a place where you, strangely enough, find
> most woodworking "shops" these days. :)
>

iwires post from "mike_holts" forum, copied and pasted below
(it makes interesting reading...). --Bill



I will post the code rule for GFCIs in basements below but the short
version is 15 and 20 amp 120 volt receptacles must have GFCI protection.

You have a few options.

1)Install a 2 pole 120/240 GFCI breaker at the panel and protect both
the 120 and 240 outlets.

2)Use a standard 2 pole breaker at the panel go to your 240 outlets
first then install a GFCI outlet at the first two (each leg of the 3
wire cable) 120 receptacles and protect all receptacles down line with
those GFCIs

3)Use a standard two pole breaker at the panel and go in any order with
the 120 and 240 outlets but install a GFCI outlet at each 120 volt location.

IMO keep the 240 outlets on a separate breaker, by the time you jump
through hoops to do this you will have spent as much as running a 2 wire
home run for the 240 outlets.

Here is the code rule.

210.8(A) Dwelling Units.
All 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20-ampere receptacles installed in
the locations specified in (1) through (8) shall have ground-fault
circuit-interrupter protection for personnel.

(5)Unfinished basements — for purposes of this section, unfinished
basements are defined as portions or areas of the basement not intended
as habitable rooms and limited to storage areas, work areas, and the like

Exception No. 1: Receptacles that are not readily accessible.

Exception No. 2: A single receptacle or a duplex receptacle for two
appliances located within dedicated space for each appliance that, in
normal use, is not easily moved from one place to another and that is
cord-and-plug connected in accordance with 400.7(A)(6), (A)(7), or (A)(8).

Exception No. 3: A receptacle supplying only a permanently installed
fire alarm or burglar alarm system shall not be required to have
ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 5:19 PM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 3:35 PM, Bill wrote:
>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>
>>> I'm not going to get into a pissing contest over a c'bkr that costs
>>> less than $10, but dedicating a 2P-30 c'bkr for each 240V load not
>>> only simplifies the installation but also allows you to isolate a
>>> problem load without affecting other loads.
>>>
>> ...
>>> Lew
>>
>>
>>
>> When the idea of adding an additional (flip) switch to each 240v circuit
>> was suggested that was one of my concerns--that it was something else to
>> go wrong, which would in turn would make it harder to isolate a problem.
>

> This is a different issue than Lew's quote above.

yes, I know, but I thought it was related and I was curious about the
value of additional switches.


> Don't know about your voltmeter, but ones that can be used for testing
> all voltages are very inexpensive and handy to have it you're going to
> be doing your own electrical work.

Thanks, that's what I wanted to hear. I'm going to have to learn to use
mine "better" before I plug it into high voltage...

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 9:49 PM


"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 3/16/2010 4:19 PM, Bill wrote:
>> Swingman wrote:
>
>>> Don't know about your voltmeter, but ones that can be used for testing
>>> all voltages are very inexpensive and handy to have it you're going to
>>> be doing your own electrical work.
>>
>> Thanks, that's what I wanted to hear. I'm going to have to learn to use
>> mine "better" before I plug it into high voltage...
>
> Only 120v use, but I carry one of these in the toolkit in my truck at all
> times ... and in my pocket during electrical inspections in houses I'm
> building. Mostly to insure that circuits are live and wired correctly, but
> also to verify to an inspector that a circuit is indeed GFCI protected
> (you don't always know where the GFCI receptacle upstream is located)
>
> http://www.tripplite.com/EN/products/model.cfm?txtmodelID=3941
>


Hmm...I have one of those too. The fine print at the link says "not for use
with Ground Fault Interrupt -GFI outlets".
So you show an outlet is GFCI protected by checking another outlet
downstream (I've read that a GFCI breaker
is often put on the first outlet off a line)? So, I take it that of the
device an outlet properly grounded, and it's not directly grounded, then it
must have been done upstream with GFCI? GFCI is one of those things I need
to read up on...

Thank you,
Bill


> --
> www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 10/22/08
> KarlC@ (the obvious)

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 10:15 PM


"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*nadaspam*@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bill" wrote
>>
>> When the idea of adding an additional (flip) switch to each 240v circuit
>> was suggested that was one of my concerns--that it was something else to
>> go wrong, which would in turn would make it harder to isolate a problem.
>>
> If you understand the layout and how to use a a multimeter, finding the
> problem is pretty straightforward.
>
>> I've got an inexpensive voltimeter which has worked fine for working with
>> 12v in the car, but I'm not sure whether it would be prudent to plug it
>> into a 240v outlet. I won't say I'm skeered, but I was thinking about
>> using it with gloves! : ) I sure believe I should test any
>> outlet before I plug a new $1000 tool into it.
>>
> Again, get an inexpensive multimeter. They are worth their weight in
> gold. They have settings for 110 and 220 volts.

I have a Radio Shack "8-Range Multitester " (bought new in 1979) : AC/DC
Voltage .... 15V, 150V, 1000V
This is the same thing you are talking about, right?

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 11:06 PM


"Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> You need to run that question past again Bill - it makes no sense as
> written.

Sorry about that.


I'll take a stab at what I think you might be asking. Your
> outlets (devices) are always "directly" grounded - even if ground fault
> protected. GFCI's simply separate the neutral from the ground at the
> device so they can monitor leakage. The device is however, still very
> much grounded, and all downstream outlets are grounded in the usual
> manner, which is to say that they are installed just like any other outlet
> which is not ground fault protected.


Thank you! Between you and Swingman, you helped me understand
that a lot better. So the GFCI at one outlet is able to monitor the
"leakage" downstream...


Meter question: Understanding this will ease my concerns about my tester.
How come one can hook it up to two hot 120 lines (240v) and NOT generate
a meltdown in the unit? Big resisters? BTW, I have read some of the "one
hand
in the back pocket" sort of safety suggestions.

Bill



>
> --
>
> -Mike-
> [email protected]
>

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 11:27 PM


"Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Meter question: Understanding this will ease my concerns about my tester.
> How come one can hook it up to two hot 120 lines (240v) and NOT generate
> a meltdown in the unit? Big resisters? BTW, I have read some of the
> "one hand
> in the back pocket" sort of safety suggestions.
>
> Bill


I just took the back of the meter off and check and the meter has an 850k
resister behind the 1000v input socket.

Wikipedia say P (watts) = V^2 / R where V is the voltage and R is the
resistance (in Ohms). BTW, Wikipedia seems
like a great place to do additonal reading on the matter....

Does that mean that for 240v, my meter is absorbing 240^2 / 850k = .0678
Watts (of "heat"), or
is this even close (in an RMS sense)?

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

17/03/2010 12:02 AM


"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*nadaspam*@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bill" wrote
>>
>> Meter question: Understanding this will ease my concerns about my
>> tester.
>> How come one can hook it up to two hot 120 lines (240v) and NOT generate
>> a meltdown in the unit? Big resisters? BTW, I have read some of the
>> "one hand
>> in the back pocket" sort of safety suggestions.
>>
> You apparently have a 1000 volt tester. It has the internal circuitry to
> handle the load as long as it is set for the proper voltage. The important
> thing is to just touch what you need tested with the test leads. You don't
> use your fingers or other parts of your anatomy. You use the test device
> in exactly the way it was intended to be used.

Thank you for the safety reminders--I take them seriously.
I can't believe that they sell this equiptment to just anyone that walks in
off
the street---doesn't SawStop make a voltimeter??? ; )

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

17/03/2010 12:06 AM


"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels*nadaspam*@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> It is not that different from what can happen with a table saw. You never
> take your eyes off of it and be very safety conscious. I should also point
> out that getting zapped with the 220 voltage is a much bigger shock and
> more serious than the regular 110 volts. DAMHIKT. So do exercise due
> caution when working with the higher voltages.


No wonder I'm a GALOOT... : )

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

17/03/2010 2:20 AM


I copied & pasted below from:
http://www.handymanclub.com/Projects/Project.aspx?id=20483
(We've given The HandyMan Club a bad rap here--but they had a decent
article).

I quote:
"When determining where to install a subpanel, be sure to follow the
National Electrical Code (NEC) requirements. In front of the subpanel, you’ll
need free working space that’s 36 in. deep and at least as wide as the
subpanel (or 30 in. wide — whichever is greater). The space above the panel
must be completely open to the structural ceiling (no shelving, etc.), and
the space below must be open to the floor (no lawnmowers, trash cans,
workbenches, etc.)."


Am I to understand from this that if a subpanel is mounted flush on a wall,
that nothing is to be place in FRONT of it (ever)? It comes down to where
it is written: "the space below must be open to the floor"---does that refer
to the space directly below the subpanel or include the 36" in front of it
mentioned earlier. Otherwise, I'd have what--a fire violation?

This may conflict with one of our "valuable space axioms" that Roy, IIRC,
mentioned before.

Just Curious,
Bill

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

18/03/2010 12:57 PM

Lew Hodgett wrote:

> Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
> a 2P-30A, non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool.

I just wished to double-check that this was supposed to be
"Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool."

This is correct, right? Is is fair to assume that most 15A tools also
have a fuse or internal shut-off system of their own?

I really feel I am close to knowing everything I will need to wire a
subpanel, some minor but important details concerning wire size, etc., I
can easily look up (I will err on the side of safety).

Meeting all code requirements raises the bar higher. For instance, I
haven't investigated whether one's conduit is expected to covered by
wallboard. Someone suggested that panels and subpanels are supposed to
have a front/backing board for instance (to cover/protect some of the
wiring).

I wish to note that I appreciate the kind, thoughtful and useful help
that I have received here. Learning how to do new things (or even old
things, like constructing a wooden plane) seems to raise my
happiness-quotient. : )

Bill

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

18/03/2010 2:04 PM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/18/2010 11:57 AM, Bill wrote:
>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>
>>> Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
>>> a 2P-30A, non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool.
>>
>> I just wished to double-check that this was supposed to be
>> "Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
>> non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool."
>>
>> This is correct, right? Is is fair to assume that most 15A tools also
>> have a fuse or internal shut-off system of their own?
>
> IME, don't even bother with 15 amp circuits, except maybe for lights.
>
> In many locales today at least 12 ga wire is required throughout, and it
> is simply too easy to use 12 ga and go with 20 amp c'brks for your 120v
> tools.

That's exactly what I was planning to do--I'm prudently choosing safety
over (false!) economy. I expect that such decisions will nullify such
factors such as a temperature of 10 degrees in the winter and 95
degrees in the summer... But, by all means, please stop me if I expect
something wrongly! :)

BTW, the IM for the 15A saw I was looking at suggests putting the saw on
a 20A circuit.

Bill

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

18/03/2010 4:48 PM

Bill wrote:
> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>
>> Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
>> a 2P-30A, non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool.
>
> I just wished to double-check that this was supposed to be
> "Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
> non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool."

It's ok, but imo as discussed earlier, it's way overkill for a home shop
unless you've got some _serious_ 240V gear, here to run a completely
independent circuit for every tool. It would take something approaching
a 5hp motor to draw 30A assuming only 50% overall efficiency and that
would have to be at full output; rarely does a tool require that. And,
breakers are designed to handle the short-term surge of a starting
current so it's not like that's a real problem, either. Plus, there's
the factor of how many of these tools can/will you be using at a time as
well.

And again, unless you're hardwiring the tool (dispensing w/ the
cordset/plug) the non-fused disconnect _is_ the plug; there's no need
for anything any fancier in a home shop and particularly if it's a
garage it could be quite inconvenient to have them essentially
permanently tethered.

Comes down to what are you really wiring here--a home shop or a
commercial business shop kinda' thing? Of course, if $$ is no concern,
go for the gold...

$0.02, imo, ymmv, etc., etc., etc., ...

-dpb

--

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

19/03/2010 1:19 AM


"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Comes down to what are you really wiring here--a home shop or a commercial
> business shop kinda' thing? Of course, if $$ is no concern, go for the
> gold...
>
> $0.02, imo, ymmv, etc., etc., etc., ...
>
> -dpb

You did a pretty job assessing my situation earlier--it was kind of you to
go out of your
way to write that the OP probably wasn't setting up shop for a commerical
business.
Borrowing a title from Hemmingway, I am after "A Clean Well-Lighted Place",
and a place
where I can build some of the things I would like to build. Paraphrasing
something Lew
wrote, "a place with a captain's seat" (too). I actually have one of those,
but it is surrounded
by books and there is no room for sawdust there.

I spent 20 minutes walking meditatively around my "Untidy Mildy-Lit Place"
this evening
with a measuring tape. I noted, sort of proud of my new knowledge, that I
could see
someone had moved an overhead light to 37" in front of the main panel--it
had evidentally been in the
space described (roughtly) in the NEC as "that space, 36" outward from the
main panel,
30 inches wide, open to the ceiling and to the floor that must remain free
space".
I noted violations of this policy that were not found during our house's
inspection.
It won't matter now though because lots of stuff is coming down--kitchen
cupboards (that look hideous),
all the wall board on at least one wall--the matter of a few feet of wire is
non-consequential.
240v DC, TS, and Air Compressor, none of which I have, merit their own
circuits. Tools on 120v circuits
can afford to do more sharing since probably only one will be powered at a
time.

Q) ShouId I leave a few inches of the wallboard around the main panel and
existing outlets and switches
(which will remain live) for any reason? BTW, I imagine it will take some
accurate measuring to
cut wallboard to fit my panel and subpanel (and outlets, etc). I noted that
it will requires 2 pieces to
fit around a panel. Going this far, I might as well add insulation to this
wall too. Concerning the wall without the
panels, I ponder whether I need to put any wallboard back up. --I obviously
need to get one of those
wiring books so I don't become an "electrical-pest" around here!

After my 20 minute inspection, I came in from my shop-to-be feeling a little
wiser, a little readier, and with the
suspicions that I'm getting read to make the biggest mess I ever made! : )
I will have to
to cut everything into small pieces so my refuse company will haul it away
week by week in the usual can.
That effort will probably more than pay for any wire I use.. : ) I'll
decide more after I find how much it cost
this weekend! ; )

Best,
Bill

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

19/03/2010 10:13 AM

Bill wrote:
...

> 240v DC, TS, and Air Compressor, none of which I have, merit their
> own circuits. Tools on 120v circuits can afford to do more sharing
> since probably only one will be powered at a time.

Again, I ask...how large a DC, TS and compressor to you really envision
having? Look realistically at how much current those are drawing an
compare to 30A...

I'm not saying you should have only one, I'd surely recommend at least
two but I'd definitely not be putting only single-dedicated outlets on
each for a dedicated purpose.

But you certainly are correct in that while you're doing major work the
cost of an additional circuit or two including the breaker isn't huge...

>
> Q) ShouId I leave a few inches of the wallboard around the main panel
> and existing outlets and switches (which will remain live) for any
> reason? BTW, I imagine it will take some
> accurate measuring to cut wallboard to fit my panel and subpanel (and
> outlets, etc). I noted that
> it will requires 2 pieces to fit around a panel. Going this far, I
> might as well add insulation to this wall too. ...

I'd cut back evenly to mid of adjacent studs for a matching
location/seam to have a solid edge if the box is on top, otherwise if
it's a major reno, it's a whole lot easier to just pull it all out and
start from scratch. In a garage they may have used a plywood backer
(which I like). And, surely now is the time to insulate as well...

Good luck...

--

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

19/03/2010 12:53 PM

dpb wrote:
> Bill wrote:

> Again, I ask...how large a DC, TS and compressor to you really envision
> having? Look realistically at how much current those are drawing an
> compare to 30A...

It's not that I thought these tools would exceed the load--I just
thought their induction motors would "prefer it" if they were are
dedicated circuits, much as I assume they would prefer to run on 240v
rather than 120v. My BS, for instance, can run on either. It is
definitely possible that my concern about this is undue--for I only
know from what I read and my intuition.




> I'd cut back evenly to mid of adjacent studs for a matching
> location/seam to have a solid edge if the box is on top, otherwise if
> it's a major reno, it's a whole lot easier to just pull it all out and
> start from scratch. In a garage they may have used a plywood backer
> (which I like). And, surely now is the time to insulate as well...
>
> Good luck...
>

Since the current main panel was put in as a repair 3 years ago (hail
damage),and the wallboard was not replaced at that time, the wallboard
and the panel do not fit together "like new". There are 2 or 3 small
missing-wallboard gaps 1/4" wide and about 2 inches long. Hardly a big
deal, but I may as well make it look like new, especially if I'm
installing the sub-panel right next to it. Since I do not see a backer
board in front, I assume there is one in back--as you suggested!

I almost hate to admit it but I am sort of excited about taking on some
of these new challenges. Probably a couple hours of crawling around the
attic will help me to curb some of my enthusiasm. Thank you for your
help and for providing me with a few valuable insights today!

I imagine I'll spend a bit more time learning about all of the details I
need to know (clamping, review codes, etc) and then eventually wire
"everything" in about 2 days. Realistic?

Bill

MM

Mike M

in reply to Bill on 19/03/2010 12:53 PM

23/03/2010 9:41 AM

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:56:03 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>
>I'm updatiing my description. It's dark outside and drizzling. Both meters
>are moving.
>
>
>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
>> is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter--no
>> more than a 3/8" gap betweeen them.
>A much longer piece of conduit (3/4"-1") comes out of the bottom of the side
>of the box and goes up into the back of the "transformer".
>
>It's concievable that the meter is my neighbors as we both have power lines
>from the same pole, in which case maybe it's his box (but it still doesn't
>make sense that the conduit goes back up into back of the transformer).
>
>My wife, who is pretty clever, and suggested turning it off to find out what
>its for! : )
>
>I think it's possible that my shut off in inside that 2'x2'x2.5' box I
>mentioned earlier, it's unlocked and would be easily reachable with a
>ladder. Another conceivable place is inside my meter's box--which has a
>special clip on it. I'm not going tampering with either, so I have no needs
>for any warnings! : ) Maybe I'll turn the small box off sometime though,
>just to see what happens....
>
>Bill
>
It sounds like if its your neighbors meter they might be using a
current transformer for the meter instead of running the load thru it.
I'm in a different local so not familiar with utilities where you are.
Normal practice would be to locate it where it enters the premise but
it would explain the 3;/4" pipe. Only other thing I could think of
would be street lights.

Mike M

BB

Bill

in reply to Bill on 19/03/2010 12:53 PM

23/03/2010 12:53 PM

Mike M wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:56:03 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> "Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> I'm updatiing my description. It's dark outside and drizzling. Both meters
>> are moving.
>>
>>
>>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
>>> is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter--no
>>> more than a 3/8" gap betweeen them.
>> A much longer piece of conduit (3/4"-1") comes out of the bottom of the side
>> of the box and goes up into the back of the "transformer".
>>
>> It's concievable that the meter is my neighbors as we both have power lines
>>from the same pole, in which case maybe it's his box (but it still doesn't
>> make sense that the conduit goes back up into back of the transformer).
>>
>> My wife, who is pretty clever, and suggested turning it off to find out what
>> its for! : )
>>
>> I think it's possible that my shut off in inside that 2'x2'x2.5' box I
>> mentioned earlier, it's unlocked and would be easily reachable with a
>> ladder. Another conceivable place is inside my meter's box--which has a
>> special clip on it. I'm not going tampering with either, so I have no needs
>> for any warnings! : ) Maybe I'll turn the small box off sometime though,
>> just to see what happens....
>>
>> Bill
>>
> It sounds like if its your neighbors meter they might be using a
> current transformer for the meter instead of running the load thru it.
> I'm in a different local so not familiar with utilities where you are.
> Normal practice would be to locate it where it enters the premise but
> it would explain the 3;/4" pipe. Only other thing I could think of
> would be street lights.

Thanks for your reply. The explanation you provided in your first
sentence above seems the most believable. It seems strange that it
would have a 15A breaker though, huh.

Thanks,
Bill

>
> Mike M

dn

dpb

in reply to Bill on 19/03/2010 12:53 PM

23/03/2010 1:39 PM

Bill wrote:
...

> Thanks for your reply. The explanation you provided in your first
> sentence above seems the most believable. It seems strange that it
> would have a 15A breaker though, huh.
...

If it really is a 15A breaker it is _NOT_ a service (nor is it if it's
in 3/4 or 1" conduit).

BTW, post any pictures to a hosting site and the link to them
here--usenet is a text-only format (even if you're using a web interface
that makes it seem otherwise--I didn't look to see what your headers
indicate).

--

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

19/03/2010 12:06 PM

Bill wrote:
...

> It's not that I thought these tools would exceed the load--I just
> thought their induction motors would "prefer it" if they were are
> dedicated circuits, much as I assume they would prefer to run on 240v
> rather than 120v. My BS, for instance, can run on either. It is
> definitely possible that my concern about this is undue--for I only
> know from what I read and my intuition.

Indeed, for such small motors as one is talking about here (and, yes,
5-10 hp is, indeed, "small") there's nothing going on that they'll have
any clue (if they were, indeed, sentient as a metaphor :) ) whether the
others are on the same circuit or not.

As for the 240V/120V, it's essentially the same; the only _real_
difference is that you halve the current at 240V which allows for the
wiring to be at smaller gauge service to accommodate load instead of
even more multiple circuits or larger wiring w/ its attendant higher
cost and especially if were to go above #10 it's a lot more work/effort.

So, if that's the reason you've been talking of single circuit for every
machine, you're definitely heading down the path for the wrong reason.

Again, not saying it's wrong to do so and overkill is better than under
for future unanticipated desires, but there's a limit of "enough's
enough" for just a casual shop.

As for the aesthetics question, given what you've described, I'd
probably dismount the box and clean up behind/around it at the same
time. Of course, if this is the primary feed panel, remember it's live
unless there's an outside disconnect or the meter is pulled while you're
doing this...

--

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

19/03/2010 1:02 PM

dpb wrote:
...

> Again, not saying it's wrong to do so and overkill is better than under
> for future unanticipated desires, but there's a limit of "enough's
> enough" for just a casual shop.
...

As example, while it's intended as sorta' temporary (altho it's now been
10 years :) ), when returned to the farm and brought the ww shop w/ me,
I wired an area in the barn that had been used as seed wheat bin for use
as a shop. I added one 30A 240V circuit and one 20A 120V.

On the 240V is the PM66 TS, Delta 8" jointer, Delta 13" Model 13 (the
old industrial style weighs 300+ not a lunchbox) and the DC and A/C
(80-gal upright). I've never had even a flicker in use, what more trip
the breaker for a startup load. The A/C was on another circuit but it
was physically moved during the barn rehab project when needed to
replace the west end floor sill plate since it was in the way and
plugged into an extra outlet in the shop and I've never got around to
putting it back where it was (and that's been approaching 5 years by now
:( ).

From what you've said your ambitions are I can't imagine you'll have
anything exceeding the above...

HTH w/ perspective.

--

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

19/03/2010 4:07 PM

dpb wrote:

> As for the aesthetics question, given what you've described, I'd
> probably dismount the box and clean up behind/around it at the same
> time. Of course, if this is the primary feed panel, remember it's live


It's only 3 years old, and you're darn right, it's live!
A nice aspect of this project is it barely involves the main panel at
all. I think I wish to respect this division.

What's to be gained from dismounting a 3-yr old box/wiring? The inside
is clean as a whistle..

Bill



> unless there's an outside disconnect or the meter is pulled while you're
> doing this...
>
> --

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

19/03/2010 4:17 PM

dpb wrote:
> dpb wrote:

> From what you've said your ambitions are I can't imagine you'll have
> anything exceeding the above...


You are right. If I had not started this thread the day would have
probably come when I would be left scratching my head wondering why the
240v plug on my TS (to be) wouldn't fit into the 240v 50A outlet I
currently have. That would br about as funny as a flow of 0v out of an
ill-fitting C'Breaker--this kind of stuff is a source of good
comedy ... : )

Bill

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

19/03/2010 4:50 PM

Bill wrote:
...

> What's to be gained from dismounting a 3-yr old box/wiring? The inside
> is clean as a whistle..
...

I thought you were complaining about there being broken/pieced sheetrock
behind/around the box in question and were asking about how to pretty
that up...my suggestion was based on that, and to do so I'd just
temporarily unmount the box, put up a ply mounting board w/ neat edges
to finish against and put it back...

If somesuch wasn't what you meant, sorry, we had a "failure to
communicate" moment... :)

--

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

19/03/2010 7:20 PM


"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Bill wrote:
> ...
>
>> What's to be gained from dismounting a 3-yr old box/wiring? The inside
>> is clean as a whistle..
> ...
>
> I thought you were complaining about there being broken/pieced sheetrock
> behind/around the box in question and were asking about how to pretty that
> up...my suggestion was based on that, and to do so I'd just temporarily
> unmount the box, put up a ply mounting board w/ neat edges to finish
> against and put it back...


Thank you. At this point, the panel is seated so that the lip of the top
sets
flush on top of the wallboard. I'm really not sure how the panel is
secured, I thought
it was typical to screw them into studs through the sides, but as large as
it is, it
seems likely that it is secured also on the back and/or on both sides. I
was hoping
to just replace the wallboard on top. Since it has to fit under the lip, it
will require
two pieces of wallboard unless I unmount the panel--and I hadn't considered
that
until you mentioned it today.

BTW, I mentioned that my desk was "surrounded by books" and I mentioned
Hemmingway.
I don't want that to misguide anyone. Basicly, most of my books are on
either math, computer
science, woodworking, or music. As I've mentioned in other threads, I'd like
to
build a few instruments some day. It appears that I'm going to see how to
put up and wire a panel,
install my own outlets, and put up some wallboard first--and at this point
that's okay with me.
The project seem quite in the general spirit of "woodworking" (to me). A
chunk of free
time would be helpful, and I'll get that in May.

Best,
Bill


BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

20/03/2010 3:32 AM


"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Bill wrote:
> ...
>
>> It's not that I thought these tools would exceed the load--I just thought
>> their induction motors would "prefer it" if they were are dedicated
>> circuits, much as I assume they would prefer to run on 240v rather than
>> 120v. My BS, for instance, can run on either. It is definitely
>> possible that my concern about this is undue--for I only
>> know from what I read and my intuition.
>
> Indeed, for such small motors as one is talking about here (and, yes, 5-10
> hp is, indeed, "small") there's nothing going on that they'll have any
> clue (if they were, indeed, sentient as a metaphor :) ) whether the others
> are on the same circuit or not.
>
> As for the 240V/120V, it's essentially the same; the only _real_
> difference is that you halve the current at 240V which allows for the
> wiring to be at smaller gauge service to accommodate load instead of even
> more multiple circuits or larger wiring w/ its attendant higher cost and
> especially if were to go above #10 it's a lot more work/effort.
>
> So, if that's the reason you've been talking of single circuit for every
> machine, you're definitely heading down the path for the wrong reason.


You did a nice job of explaining that (about the wire size). I honestly
thought that a malfunction
in one tool on a circuit could possibly result in the damage to another tool
on the same circuit.
I considered the separate circuits cheap insurance and that's why *I*
thought Lew suggested separate circuits (though
he never actually said that). That's not the reason, huh?

Bill



Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 6:42 AM

On 3/24/2010 6:12 AM, Swingman wrote:

> This appears to be some kind of cable or telephone equipment box, on
> it's own meter, a not uncommon piece of equipment, and a perfectly
> legitimate installation.
>
> I would not worry about it as it does not appear to have anything to do
> with the service to your house.

Meant to add that it is probably a power supply, or battery backup
system, either for your cable company or telephone company. Do you have
fiber optic in your area? Probably powering a node somewhere close by.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 5:50 PM


Somebody wrote:

> This appears to be some kind of cable or telephone equipment box, on
> it's own meter, a not uncommon piece of equipment, and a perfectly
> legitimate installation.
------------------------------------------
It is, talk to "Larry The Cable Guy" for details.

Same lash up on a pole located at the street in front of my complex.

Lew



Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 2:45 PM

On 3/24/2010 12:23 PM, Bill wrote:
> "Swingman"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 3/24/2010 6:12 AM, Swingman wrote:
>>
>>> This appears to be some kind of cable or telephone equipment box, on
>>> it's own meter, a not uncommon piece of equipment, and a perfectly
>>> legitimate installation.
>>>
>>> I would not worry about it as it does not appear to have anything to do
>>> with the service to your house.
>>
>> Meant to add that it is probably a power supply, or battery backup system,
>> either for your cable company or telephone company.
>
> All that is inside the small box (that I can see) is a 15A C'breaker.
>
> We do have cable in our area. The little box appears quite old.
> Maybe I'll flip the switch and see if the cable goes out .

I would suggest not doing that ... it would like shooting yourself in
the foot.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 2:44 PM

On 3/24/2010 12:35 PM, Bill wrote:
> "Swingman"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 3/24/2010 4:21 AM, Bill wrote:
>>> Mike M.
>>>
>>> Here's a link to some pics of the "Two Meter Problem".
>>> BTW, Neighbor has his own meter at his house.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://web.newsguy.com/MySite/
>>
>> This appears to be some kind of cable or telephone equipment box, on it's
>> own meter, a not uncommon piece of equipment, and a perfectly legitimate
>> installation.
>
> Can anyone suggest, then, why the conduit from the box might possibly have a
> reason lead into the back
> of the "transformer" above? If so, I'll try to put this one to rest! : )

It may just look that way from the ground. However, you can indeed feed
a transformer on the pole both ways ... see below.

I kind of doubt that is what is happening here, but you never know.

> BTW, does the "transformer" convert XXXv to 240v or something like that that
> I can (sort of) understand?

It is a step down transformer, and it takes the high voltage of the
overhead transmission lines (likely 12,000v in most USA locales) and
steps it down to the 120v feeding your house's main service panel.

The step down/up ratio depends upon the number of windings in the
transformer.

That same transformer can also work in the opposite direction ... it can
be fed 120v and put 12,000 volt back in the transmission line.

This is the major reason why, when feeding a house panel from a backup
generator during a power outage, that a cut off is required. Otherwise
you could be putting 12000 volts into a down line while someone is
trying to fix it ... something the electric company frowns on.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

Mike M

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

23/03/2010 10:53 PM

On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:53:10 -0400, Bill <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Mike M wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:56:03 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>

>>> Bill
>>>
>> It sounds like if its your neighbors meter they might be using a
>> current transformer for the meter instead of running the load thru it.
>> I'm in a different local so not familiar with utilities where you are.
>> Normal practice would be to locate it where it enters the premise but
>> it would explain the 3;/4" pipe. Only other thing I could think of
>> would be street lights.
>
>Thanks for your reply. The explanation you provided in your first
>sentence above seems the most believable. It seems strange that it
>would have a 15A breaker though, huh.
>
>Thanks,
>Bill
>
>>
>> Mike M

They may have tapped off the main lugs and used the small breakers to
protect the wires in the 3/4" pipe.

Mike M

MM

Mike M

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

23/03/2010 9:48 AM

On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:04:30 -0400, Bill <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Mike Marlow wrote:
>
>>>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>>>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
>>>> is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter--no
>>>> more than a 3/8" gap betweeen them.
>>> A much longer piece of conduit (3/4"-1" in diameter) comes out of the bottom of the
>>> side of the box and goes up into the back of the "transformer".
>>
>> A meter pole would often have a disconnect connected to the meter, at the
>> pole. This was/is common in trailer hookups. I'm not sure about the (15A)
>> statement you make. What do you mean by (15A)?
>
>Sorry, all I mean by 15A is that the small (6"x6") box attached directly
>below the meter on the pole has a single C'breaker inside marked 15A.
>I've been describing it so much, I got sloppy.
>
>
>It strkes me as odd that
>> that there would be a 15 Amp disconnect directly off a meter. The conduit
>> going back to the transformer could just have a ground running in it.
>>
>>> I think it's possible that my shut off in inside that 2'x2'x2.5' box I
>>> mentioned earlier, it's unlocked and would be easily reachable with a
>>> ladder. Another conceivable place is inside my meter's box--which has a
>>> special clip on it.
>>
>> Unless you have a disconnect installed after your meter, you have no
>> disconnect. Disconnects are common for meter poles, and but they are not
>> necessary for a standard residential hookup. Your disconnect (in normal
>> circumstances) is the main breaker in your panel. The meter head serves as
>> the disconnect for most home wiring.
>
>Thank you for this information. Just curious, would I be likely to see a
> C'breaker inside the 2'x2'x2.5' humming steel box with a number
>coinciding with the "service number" on my meter? Although this box
>wouldn't be reachable without a short ladder, it's latch is not locked.
>
>
>Those of you who have been following this thread may find another true
>story amusing: About 2 dozen years back when I worked on Fort Sill, OK
>(home of the "Field Artillery School"), I was walking between buildings
>as I did everyday and I picked up a small thing on the ground that
>looked like a condenser (from a lawnmower), and it had 2 metal wires
>coming from it. I gave it a close exam realized it wasn't a condenser
>and untwisted the two wires (for saftety) and put it in my pocket and
>went about my work for the morning. When I got back to my office, I
>called the ordinant office and they came to visit me with "shields",
>facemasks, gloves, a great big can...geeze...I told them I carried it
>around it my pocket all morning--I wasn't skeered! It was sitting on my
>desk and I told them I wold be happy to pick it up for them! It was a
>"practice blast" used for simulating real blasts in the field, for
>training. They told me not to pick up anything else I found! ; )
>
>Bill

If its the transformer enclosure you probably shouldn't be opening it.
You could have some exposure to high voltages. Can you post a
picture, I have a hard time envioning what you describe in comparison
to what I'm used to seeing.

Mike M

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 6:12 AM

On 3/24/2010 4:21 AM, Bill wrote:
> Mike M.
>
> Here's a link to some pics of the "Two Meter Problem".
> BTW, Neighbor has his own meter at his house.
>
>
> http://web.newsguy.com/MySite/

This appears to be some kind of cable or telephone equipment box, on
it's own meter, a not uncommon piece of equipment, and a perfectly
legitimate installation.

I would not worry about it as it does not appear to have anything to do
with the service to your house.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

23/03/2010 2:04 PM

Mike M wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:04:30 -0400, Bill <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>
>>>>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>>>>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
>>>>> is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter--no
>>>>> more than a 3/8" gap betweeen them.
>>>> A much longer piece of conduit (3/4"-1" in diameter) comes out of the bottom of the
>>>> side of the box and goes up into the back of the "transformer".
>>> A meter pole would often have a disconnect connected to the meter, at the
>>> pole. This was/is common in trailer hookups. I'm not sure about the (15A)
>>> statement you make. What do you mean by (15A)?
>> Sorry, all I mean by 15A is that the small (6"x6") box attached directly
>> below the meter on the pole has a single C'breaker inside marked 15A.
>> I've been describing it so much, I got sloppy.
>>
>>
>> It strkes me as odd that
>>> that there would be a 15 Amp disconnect directly off a meter. The conduit
>>> going back to the transformer could just have a ground running in it.
>>>
>>>> I think it's possible that my shut off in inside that 2'x2'x2.5' box I
>>>> mentioned earlier, it's unlocked and would be easily reachable with a
>>>> ladder. Another conceivable place is inside my meter's box--which has a
>>>> special clip on it.
>>> Unless you have a disconnect installed after your meter, you have no
>>> disconnect. Disconnects are common for meter poles, and but they are not
>>> necessary for a standard residential hookup. Your disconnect (in normal
>>> circumstances) is the main breaker in your panel. The meter head serves as
>>> the disconnect for most home wiring.
>> Thank you for this information. Just curious, would I be likely to see a
>> C'breaker inside the 2'x2'x2.5' humming steel box with a number
>> coinciding with the "service number" on my meter? Although this box
>> wouldn't be reachable without a short ladder, it's latch is not locked.
>>
>>
>> Those of you who have been following this thread may find another true
>> story amusing: About 2 dozen years back when I worked on Fort Sill, OK
>> (home of the "Field Artillery School"), I was walking between buildings
>> as I did everyday and I picked up a small thing on the ground that
>> looked like a condenser (from a lawnmower), and it had 2 metal wires
>> coming from it. I gave it a close exam realized it wasn't a condenser
>> and untwisted the two wires (for saftety) and put it in my pocket and
>> went about my work for the morning. When I got back to my office, I
>> called the ordinant office and they came to visit me with "shields",
>> facemasks, gloves, a great big can...geeze...I told them I carried it
>> around it my pocket all morning--I wasn't skeered! It was sitting on my
>> desk and I told them I wold be happy to pick it up for them! It was a
>> "practice blast" used for simulating real blasts in the field, for
>> training. They told me not to pick up anything else I found! ; )
>>
>> Bill
>
> If its the transformer enclosure you probably shouldn't be opening it.
> You could have some exposure to high voltages. Can you post a
> picture, I have a hard time envioning what you describe in comparison
> to what I'm used to seeing.

Mike M., I will post a picture. I'll try to do it tomorrow.


>
> Mike M

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 5:21 AM

Mike M.

Here's a link to some pics of the "Two Meter Problem".
BTW, Neighbor has his own meter at his house.


http://web.newsguy.com/MySite/

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 1:23 PM


"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 3/24/2010 6:12 AM, Swingman wrote:
>
>> This appears to be some kind of cable or telephone equipment box, on
>> it's own meter, a not uncommon piece of equipment, and a perfectly
>> legitimate installation.
>>
>> I would not worry about it as it does not appear to have anything to do
>> with the service to your house.
>
> Meant to add that it is probably a power supply, or battery backup system,
> either for your cable company or telephone company.

All that is inside the small box (that I can see) is a 15A C'breaker.

We do have cable in our area. The little box appears quite old.
Maybe I'll flip the switch and see if the cable goes out .

Thank you for your suggestions!
Bill



Do you have
> fiber optic in your area? Probably powering a node somewhere close by.
>
> --
> www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 10/22/08
> KarlC@ (the obvious)

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 1:35 PM


"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 3/24/2010 4:21 AM, Bill wrote:
>> Mike M.
>>
>> Here's a link to some pics of the "Two Meter Problem".
>> BTW, Neighbor has his own meter at his house.
>>
>>
>> http://web.newsguy.com/MySite/
>
> This appears to be some kind of cable or telephone equipment box, on it's
> own meter, a not uncommon piece of equipment, and a perfectly legitimate
> installation.

Can anyone suggest, then, why the conduit from the box might possibly have a
reason lead into the back
of the "transformer" above? If so, I'll try to put this one to rest! : )

BTW, does the "transformer" convert XXXv to 240v or something like that that
I can (sort of) understand?

Bill


>
> I would not worry about it as it does not appear to have anything to do
> with the service to your house.
>
> --
> www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 10/22/08
> KarlC@ (the obvious)

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 3:59 PM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/24/2010 12:23 PM, Bill wrote:
>> "Swingman"<[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> On 3/24/2010 6:12 AM, Swingman wrote:
>>>
>>>> This appears to be some kind of cable or telephone equipment box, on
>>>> it's own meter, a not uncommon piece of equipment, and a perfectly
>>>> legitimate installation.
>>>>
>>>> I would not worry about it as it does not appear to have anything to do
>>>> with the service to your house.
>>>
>>> Meant to add that it is probably a power supply, or battery backup
>>> system,
>>> either for your cable company or telephone company.
>>
>> All that is inside the small box (that I can see) is a 15A C'breaker.
>>
>> We do have cable in our area. The little box appears quite old.
>> Maybe I'll flip the switch and see if the cable goes out .
>
> I would suggest not doing that ... it would like shooting yourself in
> the foot.

Certainly agree if he doesn't know what it actually does...if it is some
sort of a cable-co setup that appears it might be, it's surely doing
more than just his one drop...

I'd still wonder if it's actually not just abandoned in place meself,
but perhaps not...the pitchurs are too dark and lack all the pertinents
sections to tell what's actually hooked to what and where, precisely...

--

cc

"chaniarts"

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 3:32 AM

24/03/2010 2:27 PM

dpb wrote:
> Swingman wrote:
>> On 3/24/2010 12:23 PM, Bill wrote:
>>> "Swingman"<[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On 3/24/2010 6:12 AM, Swingman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This appears to be some kind of cable or telephone equipment box,
>>>>> on it's own meter, a not uncommon piece of equipment, and a
>>>>> perfectly legitimate installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would not worry about it as it does not appear to have anything
>>>>> to do with the service to your house.
>>>>
>>>> Meant to add that it is probably a power supply, or battery backup
>>>> system,
>>>> either for your cable company or telephone company.
>>>
>>> All that is inside the small box (that I can see) is a 15A
>>> C'breaker. We do have cable in our area. The little box appears quite
>>> old.
>>> Maybe I'll flip the switch and see if the cable goes out .
>>
>> I would suggest not doing that ... it would like shooting yourself in
>> the foot.
>
> Certainly agree if he doesn't know what it actually does...if it is
> some sort of a cable-co setup that appears it might be, it's surely
> doing more than just his one drop...
>
> I'd still wonder if it's actually not just abandoned in place meself,
> but perhaps not...the pitchurs are too dark and lack all the
> pertinents sections to tell what's actually hooked to what and where,
> precisely...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBDrRl7d5ZA

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

20/03/2010 8:55 PM


"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Bill wrote:


Lew, I printed out your detailed directions. Thank you. I also picked up the
125A, MLO, 12/24 Load Center today.
It looked good, met the description, and was only $29.99 (at Menards), and
before I knew it I said "I'll take it!".
I'll look at it more carefully and I'll check that everything about it is
truly suitable. I also picked up two 3/4" NM clamp connectors which I
believe is appropriate for #6 or #8 wiring between the main and subpanel
and--a wiring book. Also spent a while looking at indoor wiring and
absorbing info about all sorts of related things with the awe of someone
really seeing them for the first time. Maybe that's part of new-homeowner
syndrome, or maybe it's because I had an "Erector Set" when I grew up
(anyone remember those?).

When I got home I looked at the Menards circular and kicked myself for not
picking up "Ugly's Electrical References" on the NEC, on sale for $7.99.

It is amazing how many home projects that I can consider now with much less
"fear and trepidation" than I would have had a little over a week ago!
Electrical plug not on the right side of the room--no problem! : )

Best,
Bill

LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 8:55 PM

24/03/2010 5:56 PM


"dpb" wrote:

> Glad to...as you can easily tell, I've a very close connection w/
> the concept in general and particular local co-op in particular.
> While in general I think much of what "gummit" does is an absolute
> failure or totally misguided, the establishment of the Rural
> Electrification Administration (REA) by FDR was pivotal and
> successful mostly because it only provided opportunity for locals to
> accomplish something rather than trying to decide and do it for
> them.
---------------------------------------
You bring back some memories.

The hardware store I worked in was a collection point for the local
REC.

Weekends were especially busy when people stopped in to pay their
electric bills.

Lew


BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 8:55 PM

24/03/2010 1:29 PM


"Mike M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:21:51 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>Mike M.
>>
>>Here's a link to some pics of the "Two Meter Problem".
>>BTW, Neighbor has his own meter at his house.
>>
>>
>>http://web.newsguy.com/MySite/
>>
>>Bill
>>
> Xformer is on pole and your service comes in overhead so I'll go with
> what swingman said. Doesn't look like anything the electric utility
> would do as they wouldn't have a meter for their own equipment and it
> doesn't look as big as I thought you described. If you don't get a
> bill for it as in more then one bill or meter number on your bill its
> not being charged to you.

No, it's not being charged to me, but it IS an electrical company meter.
When I registered for the electrical service at the house, I became
a shareholder of some special "cooperative corporation". Maybe the
corporation leases from
another entity, or something like that. As it happens, I found out yeterday
that there is an annual meeting of the
electrical corporation next month--with a drawing for some pretty big prizes
(it must be hard
to get people to go!). Maybe I can pick up more info there.

Thanks again!
Bill


>
> Mike M

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 8:55 PM

24/03/2010 1:51 PM

Bill wrote:
...

> When I registered for the electrical service at the house, I became
> a shareholder of some special "cooperative corporation". ...

That 'some special "cooperative corporation"' is your rural electric
co-operative _association_, a member-owned entity.

In most rural areas there wasn't a high-enough population density that
the public or private utilities gave a rat's patootie about so didn't
get access to public power until folks in those areas joined together
and formed local cooperatives to do so. Areas such as yours, while now
in residential subdivisions, were out of areas served otherwise and many
are still being served by the co-ops.

As an example, I mentioned earlier that folks were part of organizing
our local REC; they began collecting signatures/commitments in earnest
in late 1945 when it became clear that V-J Day couldn't be _too_ far
away. From that time it wasn't until 1948 we finally got power to the
farmstead/house. (Up until then, used the old Delco wind-powered
generator and a bank of storage batteries in the house basement (these
were 32 VDC systems) and a small backup gasoline-powered generator.

There are still areas in even more rural areas where such systems are
widespread enough still that one can find appliances built for them.
Weyburn, SK, is one that still had a co-op store when I was last there
about 5 years ago or so.

...
> ... As it happens, I found out yeterday that there is an annual meeting of the
> electrical corporation next month--with a drawing for some pretty big prizes
> (it must be hard to get people to go!). Maybe I can pick up more info there.

Again, it's a _co-operative_, not a "corporation".

Since it is a co-operative, it is customer-owned and important to have
enough folks to show up for the annual meetings to have a quorum and
thereby save the expense of having special ballots, etc., to confirm
your new board of directors (who will be other customers from the
various service regions) and other annual business. My IN geography
isn't good enough to guess which one might be the one serving you; that
undoubtedly also depends on which side of the city you're on; it's
unlikely one local co-op has all the surrounding service territory in
each direction.

As the city-fication of these formerly almost all rural co-ops
continues, it is, indeed, generally harder to get the suburban members
involved as they don't have a clue as to what it took to actually get
power to serve them as will many of the older members whose folks or
grandparents were, like mine, the ones who "made it happen".

Again, that's not a personal dig, simply that it is so that the folks
moving into these subdivisions such as yours are almost all urban and
simply think of the power-co as being a necessary evil that "just is".
The idea of having actually created one's own utility is just a totally
foreign concept to them and they tend to be totally disinterested as
long as the lights come on when they flip a switch.

/Warning-Anothergeezerstoryahead :)
Not only did we have no electric power until REA reached us, up until I
was in HS in the 60s we maintained our own telephone lines up to within
1/2-mi of town which was the closest interconnection point to the Bell
lines and service.

Many other areas had to do the similar thing as the REC's in order to
have any phone service at all--they formed local telephone co-ops, many
of which are still the local service providers in this general area.

Anothergeezerstoryfinished (and I promise I'll stop)/

--

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 8:55 PM

24/03/2010 5:28 PM

dpb wrote:
...

> Since it is a co-operative, it is customer-owned and important to have
> enough folks to show up for the annual meetings ...

OBTW...

If yours is anything like all others with which have any connection or
contact (and that's quite a number w/ length of association thru folks
and continued since returning to the home place and serving on board),
it'll be from a fairly major to perhaps the premier social event of the
year for the long-term members. The more the number of rural members as
opposed to the residential customers the higher on the scale that will
be, undoubtedly...

--

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 8:55 PM

24/03/2010 7:29 PM


"dpb" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> dpb wrote:
> ...
>
>> Since it is a co-operative, it is customer-owned and important to have
>> enough folks to show up for the annual meetings ...
>
> OBTW...
>
> If yours is anything like all others with which have any connection or
> contact (and that's quite a number w/ length of association thru folks and
> continued since returning to the home place and serving on board), it'll
> be from a fairly major to perhaps the premier social event of the year for
> the long-term members. The more the number of rural members as opposed to
> the residential customers the higher on the scale that will be,
> undoubtedly...
>
>


dpb,

Thank you for filling me in regarding many of the details of my "electrical
cooperative"!
I understood the intent, but I didn't have the perspective. Two surrounding
cities are fighting over the right to tax our area. I don't know a lot
about the details but
I know I have to pay a 3rd party to pick up our garbage--and I think it's
cheaper that
way too. My property taxes are currently "very reasonable".

I'll try to make it to the annual meeting of my electrical cooperative: the
"premier social event" --O'boy!

Best,
Bill

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 8:55 PM

24/03/2010 7:26 PM

Bill wrote:
...

> Thank you for filling me in regarding many of the details of my "electrical
> cooperative"!
> I understood the intent, but I didn't have the perspective. ...
>
> I'll try to make it to the annual meeting of my electrical cooperative: the
> "premier social event" --O'boy!
>
Glad to...as you can easily tell, I've a very close connection w/ the
concept in general and particular local co-op in particular. While in
general I think much of what "gummit" does is an absolute failure or
totally misguided, the establishment of the Rural Electrification
Administration (REA) by FDR was pivotal and successful mostly because it
only provided opportunity for locals to accomplish something rather than
trying to decide and do it for them.

Here's a link to the NRECA (the national association of REC's) that has
a brief history...

<http://www.nreca.org/AboutUs/Co-op101/CoopHistory.htm>

I hope you do go and have an enjoyable evening as well as learn and
participate in your co-op's business as well as get to meet a at least
some of what remain of the old codgers who must have been instrumental
in getting yours to where it is currently...they'll undoubtedly be a lot
of comparing of weather, crops, cattle prices, etc., etc., etc., ... :)

There are quite a number that we only see at these meetings any longer
as they don't get around as much any longer and since the service area
is nearly 175 miles from one end to another and our place is well
towards the western end, it's quite far enough that just don't "drop in
while passing by"...

--

MM

Mike M

in reply to "Bill" on 20/03/2010 8:55 PM

24/03/2010 10:00 AM


On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:21:51 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Mike M.
>
>Here's a link to some pics of the "Two Meter Problem".
>BTW, Neighbor has his own meter at his house.
>
>
>http://web.newsguy.com/MySite/
>
>Bill
>
Xformer is on pole and your service comes in overhead so I'll go with
what swingman said. Doesn't look like anything the electric utility
would do as they wouldn't have a meter for their own equipment and it
doesn't look as big as I thought you described. If you don't get a
bill for it as in more then one bill or meter number on your bill its
not being charged to you.

Mike M

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

20/03/2010 9:26 PM


"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
...
> Finally, buy a 10-2 with ground, 25 ft long molded cord set, chop off the
> receptacle end and rewire with an extra deep, 2 gang box wired with a pair
> of receptacles.
>
> It becomes your "go to" extension cord.


If I understand your idea, THAT sounds pretty handy! It gets plugged into
any wall or ceiling plug, right?
I think I've seen receptacles something like you described positioned in the
center of work areas. Since you
mentioned it, I assume that doing this meets NEC (but, of course, I accept
the responsibility of checking for myself).

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 4:48 AM

Frustrated that I didn't know how my main panel was mounted, I visited it
with a screwdriver. Careful that I wasn't grounded I opened the cover, and
started to remove the only 2 screws that were inside, one at the center of
the top and one at the center of the bottom. After noting that that they
corresponded to a plate whose removal wasn't going to help me, I tighted
them back down.

Now, having read what little I could find online, I few stupid just for
having done that.

I since learned, from reading, how much can possibly go wrong just by
removing the cover. Surely the 8 screws around the outside will free it and
there is "most certainly" a backing board to which it is screwed to which is
really holding it up. To me, it seemed at first that the 8 screws around the
outside were holding it up... I'm glad I didn't let that plate fall loose
inside the panel! Who knows what horrible nasty things could have possibly
happened... :(

I understand the logic of the system (BTW, the main board is a Siemans and
the subpanel I bought is a Cutler-Hammer). Surely the new subpanel will
want a backing board too. Since I was planning to install the subpanel
right next to the main panel, I thought that I might learn something from
examining the main panel. I don't think I have to tell you, who know,
however, that **you're not supposed to mess with the main panel!**--at least
that's the message that comes accrossed!! I think I've come to the
temporary conclusion that my curiosity doesn't justify my messing with it.
The wrong close look could get ya!

Another tip I learned while reading was to shut off all of the circuit
breakers, before shutting off the main one, before adding a new one. Like
Swingman says, this stuff makes sense, you just need someone to tell you
what makes sense.

In a way, even a sideways step is a step forward--I'm just glad I didn't
make an expensive one. When I was about 10 I read quite a bit of the book,
"The Boy Electrician"--even built a thing or two. The stakes are higher
now.

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 5:23 AM


"Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
=When I was about 10 I read quite a bit of the book,
> "The Boy Electrician"--even built a thing or two.

> Bill

I see the book is free online. I single-handedly made the thing on page 198
(Fig. 153, "The Medical Coil") when I was 13. It worked too.
I remember going to buy some "iron wire" at the hardware store. I repeated
asked the clerk at the hardware store, "is it iron?" I couldn't get a
definitive answer...lol...The question would probably annoy a store clerk
today as much as it did back when. Seriously. Have your young son or
daughter ask and see. Or just imagine it. : )

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 5:36 AM


"Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Bill wrote:
>
>>
>> Another tip I learned while reading was to shut off all of the circuit
>> breakers, before shutting off the main one, before adding a new one.
>> Like Swingman says, this stuff makes sense, you just need someone to
>> tell you what makes sense.
>
> Don't know where you learned that one Bill, but it's not right. There is
> no need to shut off all of the branch breakers before shutting of the main
> and there is no need to shut off the main before inserting a new breaker.
>

Thanks Mike. I read it at a do-it-yourself website. Thank you for pointing
out
that the web sites suggestion lacked integrity. FWIW, the justification at
the
web site was that it would result in less of a jolt to the system to turn
off all the
breakers before turning off the main one. Anything to that?

Best,
Bill


>
> --
>
> -Mike-
> [email protected]
>

JC

"J. Clarke"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 9:27 AM

On 3/21/2010 5:36 AM, Bill wrote:
> "Mike Marlow"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Bill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Another tip I learned while reading was to shut off all of the circuit
>>> breakers, before shutting off the main one, before adding a new one.
>>> Like Swingman says, this stuff makes sense, you just need someone to
>>> tell you what makes sense.
>>
>> Don't know where you learned that one Bill, but it's not right. There is
>> no need to shut off all of the branch breakers before shutting of the main
>> and there is no need to shut off the main before inserting a new breaker.
>>
>
> Thanks Mike. I read it at a do-it-yourself website. Thank you for pointing
> out
> that the web sites suggestion lacked integrity. FWIW, the justification at
> the
> web site was that it would result in less of a jolt to the system to turn
> off all the
> breakers before turning off the main one. Anything to that?

While there is no _need_, turning them all off is a good idea in that
when you turn the main back on you don't get every electrical device in
the house starting up at once. Usually a nonissue but if you have a
bunch of inductive loads you may not be able to reset the main breaker
without turning off the others or turning off the loads.

And turning the main off before adding a breaker may not be strictly
necessary, but if you're a butterfingers like me it's a damned good idea.

Both are common sense. They do no harm and may do some good.

JC

"J. Clarke"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 9:20 AM

On 3/21/2010 5:23 AM, Bill wrote:
> "Bill"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> =When I was about 10 I read quite a bit of the book,
>> "The Boy Electrician"--even built a thing or two.
>
>> Bill
>
> I see the book is free online. I single-handedly made the thing on page 198
> (Fig. 153, "The Medical Coil") when I was 13. It worked too.
> I remember going to buy some "iron wire" at the hardware store. I repeated
> asked the clerk at the hardware store, "is it iron?" I couldn't get a
> definitive answer...lol...The question would probably annoy a store clerk
> today as much as it did back when. Seriously. Have your young son or
> daughter ask and see. Or just imagine it. : )

How the times have changed. Can you imagine the hue and cry that would
go up today if Youth Services found out that somebody was letting their
kid play with lead and acid?

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 10:25 AM

Swingman wrote:
...

> What you needed here you basically already have, good practical advice
> on what to buy and what you need in order to design a good shop wiring
> scheme.
>
> At this point, your next step is to go learn how to do it ... and you're
> simply not going to do that here.
>
> AAMOF, and from my observation, it's starting to verge on getting
> dangerous.
>
> ;)

Yeah, I backed out and started to regret having brought up a couple
points I raised as simply trying to be informative...

I agree wholeheartedly w/ the advice given herein.

--

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 6:17 PM


"Steve" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> Bill,
>
> If you get a chance I would definately recommend the "Ugly's Electrical
> References" book. I have one at my desk and far and away the most usefull
> reference book that I have. I do low voltage designs for a living and it
> covers that as well.
>
> Good Luck,
> Steve


Thank you, everyone, for your suggestions. I read all of them at least 3
times.
I picked up Stanley's "Complete Wiring" yesterday. And went back to Menards
to
get "Ugly's Electrical References", but they were out. Also picked up a
14-terminal
ground bar (14 terminals + 2/0 Lug). I asked enough questions to make me
more
comfortable with what is required to installing my subpanel.
Spent a lot of time looking at all of the fixtures I'll need (including the
pricier GFCI ones).
They definitely did Not push those at me. As least I have some confirmation
that
what I am doing is consistent with local standards. I'll go the GCFI route
because
I think it's smart in my environment.

I'll take care to try to work smart. Somebody broke the lock off on what I
think may be my
main shut off (and as noted, this is important!). I may call the power
company.
Let me describe my electric:

Back of house has meter. Another meter is on the pole away from the house
and just below
is is a box with a 15A circuit breaker (which should probably have a lock on
its box)! I was
thinking this may be my main shutoff (and this is something I would really
like to know).
4 feet above this meter is a 3' by 2' by 2' metal box
(transformer/distributer?) which
makes quite a lot of noise, and 20 feet or more above that is a 5 or 6 foot
cylindrical thing (transformer?)
near which power lines flow to other poles with cylindrical things 3 or 4
houses away. What would be really nice to know
is whether the 15A circuit breaker might be my "main shutoff"--but any
relavant info would
be useful to me, I'm sure.

I promise to strive to keep learning on my own. Thank you for your
indulgence. I bought a pair
of linesman's pliers--almost time to learn to use them!

Bill

MM

Mike M

in reply to "Bill" on 21/03/2010 6:17 PM

22/03/2010 3:14 PM

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:57:33 -0400, Bill <[email protected]>
wrote:

>dpb wrote:
>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>> dpb wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rural areas may well have had more than one service drop at the same
>>>> farmstead -- we have two here; one for the well/farm buildings, the
>>>> other serves the house.
>
>It's not rural at all! I'm in a suburb of Indianapolis established in
>the 70s. I promise, I will get to the bottom of the "Two-Meter Problem"!
>
>My horse--I mean house, came with a 16' barn (a tan "urban" barn) which
>sits in front of the pole--virtually blocking line-of-sight noise made
>by the 2'x2'x2.5' steel transformer/distributer. Anything that can be
>done to subdue the noise those things make? I can conceive of some sort
>of muffler and I'm willing to pay for it. That's actually a question
>I've been saving for my power company.
>
>Bill

You shouldn't normally hear much more then a hum from the transformer.
If its really loud you should have your utility check it. If its loud
enough they will likely change it out. The second meter is unusual
unless it was for something that predated your knowledge of what
happened at the property.

Mike M

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 6:31 PM


"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 3/21/2010 4:36 AM, Bill wrote:
>> "Mike Marlow"<[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Bill wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Another tip I learned while reading was to shut off all of the circuit
>>>> breakers, before shutting off the main one, before adding a new one.
>>>> Like Swingman says, this stuff makes sense, you just need someone to
>>>> tell you what makes sense.
>>>
>>> Don't know where you learned that one Bill, but it's not right. There
>>> is
>>> no need to shut off all of the branch breakers before shutting of the
>>> main
>>> and there is no need to shut off the main before inserting a new
>>> breaker.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Mike. I read it at a do-it-yourself website. Thank you for
>> pointing
>> out
>> that the web sites suggestion lacked integrity. FWIW, the justification
>> at
>> the
>> web site was that it would result in less of a jolt to the system to turn
>> off all the
>> breakers before turning off the main one. Anything to that?
>
> Bill ... there are two things that you need to keep in mind before messing
> with electricity as a DIY'er, and that WILL protect you:
>
> 1. Protect yourself, from yourself, and from the wiring mistakes of those
> who came before you by turning off the electricity to the entire structure
> AT THE SOURCE.
>
> 2. No one has ever been electrocuted by a completely, and verifiably
> _dead_, un-powered, un-electrified system ... IOW, and as Lew indicated
> ... go to the actual SOURCE, turn it off, lock it up, and put the key in
> your pocket until you're done.
>
> Another thing I've noted about your posts ... you keep talking about the
> damned NEC.
>
> Forget it! Reading the NEC is nothing but a confusing waste of your time
> and you will learn nothing of a practical nature from reading it ...
> guaranteed!
>
> Leave the NEC to the inspectors and kibitzers.
>
> Instead, buy yourself a couple of BASIC books on home wiring, starting
> with something that covers the basics with lots of illustrations like
> these:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Guide-Home-Wiring-Comprehensive/dp/0865734291/ref=sip_rech_dp_10
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Orthos-About-Wiring-Basics-Improvement/dp/0897214404
>
> You will learn more about the practical things you need to know to
> actually wire your shop then you'll ever learn by reading the NEC, or even
> hanging around the wRec asking scatter gun questions that are so
> uninformed that they are difficult to answer, thus running a real risk of
> receiving advice, or misinterpreting that advice, that may hurt you.
>
> What you needed here you basically already have, good practical advice on
> what to buy and what you need in order to design a good shop wiring
> scheme.
>
> At this point, your next step is to go learn how to do it ... and you're
> simply not going to do that here.

Yep. Thanks, Bill


> --
> www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 10/22/08
> KarlC@ (the obvious)

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

21/03/2010 10:48 PM


"Nonny" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>
> Just a tiny, little, FWIW.
>
> One time, a long time ago in a past life, old Nonny stuck in a breaker for
> some little load in his shop. The panel was a 36 circuit 200a one.
> Somewhere, along the way, one of the wires from a 30a circuit to a water
> heater snuck over into a corner of the box and came up alongside the tabs
> where the front screwed to the box.
>
> Poor old Nonny was sticking the front cover back in place when the sheet
> metal screw he was using (note: ALL flat ended screws furnished with
> panels disappear/get lost/are taken/break etc.) drove straight into the
> 10g. wire on the 30a breaker. The bang and fireball were worth note, and
> from that moment on, old Nonny made damned sure that no wires snuck up
> under panel face mounting tabs ever again.
>

Good story. My wife asked me why I spend so much time as I do mentioning
all of the types of accidents that can occur in a shop. I explained that
I'm trying to teach myself to avoid them. I think the main key strategy
is not to be in a rush.

Bill




> --
> Nonny
> When we talk to God, we're praying,
> but when God talks to us,
> we're schizophrenic.
> What's the deal?
>
>
>

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 1:02 AM


"Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>> I promise to strive to keep learning on my own.
>
> That might possibly be your riskiest move...

I know what you mean. I'm undecided whether wiring or running a TS is
riskier.


>> Thank you for your
>> indulgence. I bought a pair
>> of linesman's pliers--almost time to learn to use them!
>>
>
> You're scaring me Bill...

Linesman's pliers not an appropriate tool? I bought a wire stripper too.

I got scared last night, but I overcame it--and it took gumption! : )
I will proceed safely as Swingman suggested. I will turn off the electricity
in my work
area before I tear down my wall. I will see if my local "electric
cooperative" (corporation) can explain
a few things.

No one answered my question--what the 15A c'breaker below the meter on the
pole below the transformers(?) might be for--maybe a protector for the meter
on the pole? The lock rusted off of it and apparently the electric company
isn't concerned.

I will remember to proceed only with caution. I will learn where my main
shutoff is. I can't do very much until May anyway.
I will learn how to tear down a wall properly (without screwing up the
ceiling)! : )

Respectfully,
Bill


>
> --
>
> -Mike-
> [email protected]
>

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 2:04 AM


"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Mike Marlow" wrote:
>> Bill - I am not trying to be insulting, but I am getting increasingly
>> concerned. I have to ask you (and I hope you will think about this
>> question...), how can you possibly work smart when you don't even know
>> what "may be" your electrical shut off? You really need more knowledge
>> before you move forward. Spend the money - bring in an electrician, and
>> learn from him while he works.
> <snip>
> --------------------------------------
> Now you have truly hit what is driving this discussion, MONEY, or more
> definitively, Bill's unwillingness to spend it.
>
> Lew

FWIW, the last two contractors I've hired (non-electrical) acted like I was
in the way ("are you
going to do it, or am I going to do it?"). I'm naturally drawn towards
people who have something
to teach me (and, conversely, I teach as part of my profession).

I'm equivalently excited about the electrical as I would be a new
woodworking project.
I came home with my subpanel feeling like it was Christmas--for only
$29.99)! I told my
wife I would not have been as excited about a $250 Solid-State-Drive (for
the computer).
So, with all due respect, there's something deeper than the greenback at
stake here.
It's more about control. Learning the skill to install switches, lights and
and plugs everywhere and anywhere
in the house I want. It feels good! Similarly, I bought a bunch of drywall
tools--so I can practice in the garage and do
nice paint and drywall work throughout my home. I think a lot is about
the accomplishment that comes from doing something myself. Similarly, I'm
interested in
landscaping my yard--it's a canvas. The idea of paying someone else to do
"my art" is completely unthinkable. When I mount several outlets and light
panels on my shop ceiling it will be done in a more perfect than I could
pay anyone to do, as no one cares about it more than I do. Maybe I do all
this out of love. I'm Vawey passionate! : )

amateur---a person who engages in a study, sport, or other activity for
pleasure rather than for financial benefit or professional reasons

Bill

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 9:58 AM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/22/2010 12:02 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> No one answered my question--what the 15A c'breaker below the meter on
>> the
>> pole below the transformers(?) might be for--maybe a protector for the
>> meter
>> on the pole? The lock rusted off of it and apparently the electric
>> company
>> isn't concerned.
>
> On your side of the meter that meters your electrical usage?
>
> If it's on your side of the meter the electric company may not want to
> even be involved, their involvement stops at either their side of the
> meter, or in many places at the service head.

As a board member (Dad was one of founding members/50-yr served on
board) I can GARONTEE that if you call and ask the kinds of questions
you're now asking they're going to tell you to keep your mitts off'en
any and every-thing even resembling more than a wall switch... :(


> Do you have an outdoor light? A 15A exterior circuit sounds like it
> would be for exterior lighting, or perhaps feeding an exterior
> receptacle for garden use.

Certainly a far more reasonable hypothesis than a 15A breaker is going
to have anything whatsoever to do w/ the main feed...

Bill, again as others have said, this isn't to insult but...

Your level of experience here is too low to be trying this from scratch.
Those here w/ advice either grew up watching folks who already knew
how to do this and learned that way or have had other ways to get
training/knowledge. Clearly, your background is not "hands-on" --
nothing wrong w/ that, but it doesn't equip you to have the basics that
let you know what's what here.

If you won't accede and hire the work done, _at_the_very_least_ find a
neighbor or coworker or somebody who does have this practical bent and
get some tutoring. I strongly recommend continuing down this path alone
given what your present state of knowledge/experience is.

--

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 12:41 PM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/22/2010 12:02 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> No one answered my question--what the 15A c'breaker below the meter on
>> the
>> pole below the transformers(?) might be for--maybe a protector for the
>> meter
>> on the pole? The lock rusted off of it and apparently the electric
>> company
>> isn't concerned.
>
> On your side of the meter that meters your electrical usage?
>
> If it's on your side of the meter the electric company may not want to
> even be involved, their involvement stops at either their side of the
> meter, or in many places at the service head.
>

There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter.
No exterior lighting in the neighborhood--it's dark. Maybe there's an
outlet I'm not aware of. But it doesn't make sense that if there were,
that it would be on the back pole (unless it were cheaper and easier
than running a 40' line underground). I've investigate further. My
neighbor may be a source of info too--it's his pole too.

Best,
Bill




> Do you have an outdoor light? A 15A exterior circuit sounds like it
> would be for exterior lighting, or perhaps feeding an exterior
> receptacle for garden use.
>

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 12:49 PM

Mike Marlow wrote:
> Bill wrote:
>
>> I'm equivalently excited about the electrical as I would be a new
>> woodworking project.
>> I came home with my subpanel feeling like it was Christmas--for only
>> $29.99)! I told my
>> wife I would not have been as excited about a $250 Solid-State-Drive
>> (for the computer).
>> So, with all due respect, there's something deeper than the greenback
>> at stake here.
>> It's more about control. Learning the skill to install switches,
>> lights and and plugs everywhere and anywhere
>> in the house I want. It feels good! Similarly, I bought a bunch of
>> drywall tools--so I can practice in the garage and do
>> nice paint and drywall work throughout my home. I think a lot is
>> about the accomplishment that comes from doing something myself.
>> Similarly, I'm interested in
>> landscaping my yard--it's a canvas. The idea of paying someone else
>> to do "my art" is completely unthinkable. When I mount several
>> outlets and light panels on my shop ceiling it will be done in a
>> more perfect than I could pay anyone to do, as no one cares about it
>> more than I do. Maybe I do all this out of love. I'm Vawey
>> passionate! : )
>
> That's the perfect reason for learning to do things for yourself. I agree
> with your motivation completely Bill. That said, somethings require more
> knowledge, going into them than other things. Electrical work is one of
> those. It's not black magic and it's not something you couldn't learn, but
> it does bring more serious consequences when you do something wrong than a
> bad cut in a piece of wood does.


To try to ease anyone's mind, I will share with you that I called a
relative with 30 years electrical experience yesterday. I never actually
saw him do any of the work (a shame), but I KNOW he did it! He agreed
to drive three hundred miles each way and do the hookup to the main
panel and check all of my work once I've wired the subpanel and
everything that draws power from it. Feel a little better? : )

Best,
Bill



dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 11:54 AM

Bill wrote:
...

> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
> is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter.
> No exterior lighting in the neighborhood--it's dark. Maybe there's an
> outlet I'm not aware of. But it doesn't make sense that if there were,
> that it would be on the back pole (unless it were cheaper and easier
> than running a 40' line underground). I've investigate further. My
> neighbor may be a source of info too--it's his pole too.
...

Are you sure both of these meters are even active? If they were, you're
billing information should show readings from each.

If, as this now appears may be, this is a rural development, it's
possible one meter is the well/former outbuildings of a former farm
place or somesuch.

OTOH, it could also be simply remnants of a former installation that has
been abandoned in place or a service to a no-longer-existing barn or
other outbuildings, etc.

I reiterate that w/ such a lack of ability to even discern what you're
looking at you need somebody more knowledgeable to serve as a mentor
before you proceed as a barest possible minimum.

It is simply beyond the ability of usenet and/or the internet to provide
the education needed.

--

Ff

FrozenNorth

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 1:12 PM

On 3/22/10 1:04 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
> Bill wrote:
>
>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the
>> pole is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the
>> meter. No exterior lighting in the neighborhood--it's dark. Maybe
>> there's an outlet I'm not aware of. But it doesn't make sense that
>> if there were, that it would be on the back pole (unless it were
>> cheaper and easier than running a 40' line underground). I've
>> investigate further. My neighbor may be a source of info too--it's
>> his pole too.
>
> I cannot for the life of me imagine why there would be two meters on the
> same service. I'd suggest you're seeing this incorrectly.
>
Agreed, the two meters would never agree anyways, as the meters themself
will have some loss.

--
Froz...


The system will be down for 10 days for preventive maintenance.

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 12:35 PM

FrozenNorth wrote:
> On 3/22/10 1:04 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
>> Bill wrote:
>>
>>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the
>>> pole is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the
>>> meter. No exterior lighting in the neighborhood--it's dark. Maybe
>>> there's an outlet I'm not aware of. But it doesn't make sense that
>>> if there were, that it would be on the back pole (unless it were
>>> cheaper and easier than running a 40' line underground). I've
>>> investigate further. My neighbor may be a source of info too--it's
>>> his pole too.
>>
>> I cannot for the life of me imagine why there would be two meters on the
>> same service. I'd suggest you're seeing this incorrectly.
>>
> Agreed, the two meters would never agree anyways, as the meters themself
> will have some loss.

Rural areas may well have had more than one service drop at the same
farmstead -- we have two here; one for the well/farm buildings, the
other serves the house.

They're not the "same" service and I'm not suggesting that for Bill's
case either. I'm simply suggesting it's possible one of those is
possibly abandoned in place (specifically mentioned) and/or owing to
being on an old farmstead he does still have two drops. In the later,
they both should, indeed, show on the statements and they'll not have
anything to do w/ each other.

--

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 1:59 PM

Mike Marlow wrote:
> Bill wrote:
>
>> To try to ease anyone's mind, I will share with you that I called a
>> relative with 30 years electrical experience yesterday. I never
>> actually saw him do any of the work (a shame), but I KNOW he did it! He
>> agreed to drive three hundred miles each way and do the hookup to
>> the main panel and check all of my work once I've wired the subpanel
>> and everything that draws power from it. Feel a little better? : )
>>
>
> Much. Now - to satisfy that nobel curiosity of yours,


: ) FWIW, I've built a career founded on my curiosity and eagerness to
pursue answers (as have lots of other folks that have enjoyed some
affinity for computers, engineering, fine woodworking, et. al.)!



make sure to let all
> the air out of his tires so that he can't just hook it up and leave, so that
> you'll have time to have him teach you things beyond just the work at hand.
> Great opportunity to learn and gain some new skills.
>

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 1:20 PM

Mike Marlow wrote:
> dpb wrote:
>
>> Rural areas may well have had more than one service drop at the same
>> farmstead -- we have two here; one for the well/farm buildings, the
>> other serves the house.
>>
>
> Yeah - I had not thought about that. Somehow I got it into my head that
> Bill was saying he had two meters on his house service and did not think
> beyond that.

Or, it's possible in his case there's a shared well w/ a neighbor, maybe
and one is associated with that...it's impossible to tell and Bill
clearly doesn't know what he has for sure.

(And again, that's nothing personal; simply clearly so from the
statements made and questions asked. And, while it's good to ask, as
noted he needs more than a forum or some web sites are going to provide
so it's good a more experienced person is going to play that role.
Hopefully this individual's experience is adequate and knowledge/skill
set and work habits are all good...)

--

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 3:57 PM

dpb wrote:
> Mike Marlow wrote:
>> dpb wrote:
>>
>>> Rural areas may well have had more than one service drop at the same
>>> farmstead -- we have two here; one for the well/farm buildings, the
>>> other serves the house.

It's not rural at all! I'm in a suburb of Indianapolis established in
the 70s. I promise, I will get to the bottom of the "Two-Meter Problem"!

My horse--I mean house, came with a 16' barn (a tan "urban" barn) which
sits in front of the pole--virtually blocking line-of-sight noise made
by the 2'x2'x2.5' steel transformer/distributer. Anything that can be
done to subdue the noise those things make? I can conceive of some sort
of muffler and I'm willing to pay for it. That's actually a question
I've been saving for my power company.

Bill

dn

dpb

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 4:20 PM

Bill wrote:
> dpb wrote:
>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>> dpb wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rural areas may well have had more than one service drop at the same
>>>> farmstead -- we have two here; one for the well/farm buildings, the
>>>> other serves the house.
>
> It's not rural at all! I'm in a suburb of Indianapolis established in
> the 70s. I promise, I will get to the bottom of the "Two-Meter Problem"!
...
It probably was then...

--

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/03/2010 11:56 PM


"Bill" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

I'm updatiing my description. It's dark outside and drizzling. Both meters
are moving.


> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
> is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter--no
> more than a 3/8" gap betweeen them.
A much longer piece of conduit (3/4"-1") comes out of the bottom of the side
of the box and goes up into the back of the "transformer".

It's concievable that the meter is my neighbors as we both have power lines
from the same pole, in which case maybe it's his box (but it still doesn't
make sense that the conduit goes back up into back of the transformer).

My wife, who is pretty clever, and suggested turning it off to find out what
its for! : )

I think it's possible that my shut off in inside that 2'x2'x2.5' box I
mentioned earlier, it's unlocked and would be easily reachable with a
ladder. Another conceivable place is inside my meter's box--which has a
special clip on it. I'm not going tampering with either, so I have no needs
for any warnings! : ) Maybe I'll turn the small box off sometime though,
just to see what happens....

Bill

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

23/03/2010 11:04 AM

Mike Marlow wrote:

>>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the pole
>>> is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the meter--no
>>> more than a 3/8" gap betweeen them.
>> A much longer piece of conduit (3/4"-1" in diameter) comes out of the bottom of the
>> side of the box and goes up into the back of the "transformer".
>
> A meter pole would often have a disconnect connected to the meter, at the
> pole. This was/is common in trailer hookups. I'm not sure about the (15A)
> statement you make. What do you mean by (15A)?

Sorry, all I mean by 15A is that the small (6"x6") box attached directly
below the meter on the pole has a single C'breaker inside marked 15A.
I've been describing it so much, I got sloppy.


It strkes me as odd that
> that there would be a 15 Amp disconnect directly off a meter. The conduit
> going back to the transformer could just have a ground running in it.
>
>> I think it's possible that my shut off in inside that 2'x2'x2.5' box I
>> mentioned earlier, it's unlocked and would be easily reachable with a
>> ladder. Another conceivable place is inside my meter's box--which has a
>> special clip on it.
>
> Unless you have a disconnect installed after your meter, you have no
> disconnect. Disconnects are common for meter poles, and but they are not
> necessary for a standard residential hookup. Your disconnect (in normal
> circumstances) is the main breaker in your panel. The meter head serves as
> the disconnect for most home wiring.

Thank you for this information. Just curious, would I be likely to see a
C'breaker inside the 2'x2'x2.5' humming steel box with a number
coinciding with the "service number" on my meter? Although this box
wouldn't be reachable without a short ladder, it's latch is not locked.


Those of you who have been following this thread may find another true
story amusing: About 2 dozen years back when I worked on Fort Sill, OK
(home of the "Field Artillery School"), I was walking between buildings
as I did everyday and I picked up a small thing on the ground that
looked like a condenser (from a lawnmower), and it had 2 metal wires
coming from it. I gave it a close exam realized it wasn't a condenser
and untwisted the two wires (for saftety) and put it in my pocket and
went about my work for the morning. When I got back to my office, I
called the ordinant office and they came to visit me with "shields",
facemasks, gloves, a great big can...geeze...I told them I carried it
around it my pocket all morning--I wasn't skeered! It was sitting on my
desk and I told them I wold be happy to pick it up for them! It was a
"practice blast" used for simulating real blasts in the field, for
training. They told me not to pick up anything else I found! ; )

Bill

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

23/03/2010 12:40 PM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/23/2010 10:04 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> Those of you who have been following this thread may find another true
>> story amusing: About 2 dozen years back when I worked on Fort Sill, OK
>> (home of the "Field Artillery School"),
>
> Small world ... I'm a graduate of "Comanche County Canon Cockers
> College" myself. Took AIT there, and graduated from Field Artillery
> Officer Candidate School after that.
>
> I liked OK ... except for the 3.2 beer, and the cowgirls who could whip
> your butt in a game of 8 ball and holler "next!".
>
> :)

I didn't mind the 3.2 beer. I used to practice my 8-ball at the "Little
Brown Jug" on Fort Sill Blvd. sometimes on the weekend. That was one of
the "classier" little bars in that area. I learned that I liked Korean
food at the little cafe about 4 doors down from there. I maintained my
enthusiasm for Korean food for quite a while. It made me sweat a lot
when I ate it, but I ate it anyway. Unfortunately, I've since had to go
with a kinder, gentler diet. I enjoyed the wildlife refuge at Fort Sill
alot--hiking, climbing, fishing... That was a nice amenity. Fond
memories...

Bill

BB

Bill

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

23/03/2010 1:58 PM

Swingman wrote:
> On 3/23/2010 11:40 AM, Bill wrote:
>> Swingman wrote:
>>> On 3/23/2010 10:04 AM, Bill wrote:
>>>
>>>> Those of you who have been following this thread may find another true
>>>> story amusing: About 2 dozen years back when I worked on Fort Sill, OK
>>>> (home of the "Field Artillery School"),
>>>
>>> Small world ... I'm a graduate of "Comanche County Canon Cockers
>>> College" myself. Took AIT there, and graduated from Field Artillery
>>> Officer Candidate School after that.
>>>
>>> I liked OK ... except for the 3.2 beer, and the cowgirls who could
>>> whip your butt in a game of 8 ball and holler "next!".
>>>
>>> :)
>>
>> I didn't mind the 3.2 beer. I used to practice my 8-ball at the "Little
>> Brown Jug" on Fort Sill Blvd. sometimes on the weekend. That was one of
>> the "classier" little bars in that area. I learned that I liked Korean
>> food at the little cafe about 4 doors down from there. I maintained my
>> enthusiasm for Korean food for quite a while. It made me sweat a lot
>> when I ate it, but I ate it anyway. Unfortunately, I've since had to go
>> with a kinder, gentler diet. I enjoyed the wildlife refuge at Fort Sill
>> alot--hiking, climbing, fishing... That was a nice amenity. Fond
>> memories...
>
> Was a great place for Western Swing too.
>
> There was an old fashioned beer joint/dance hall/roadhouse down the road
> from Lawton, in Cache, OK, ... a place where I got to see many of my
> musical heroes, like Hank Thompson, and many musicians who had been with
> Bob Wills in the 30's and 40's, playing in bands who came through the
> area ... I've actually had the pleasure of playing with many of them
> since I first saw them there in the sixties.
>
> Years later, and just for grins, I went back to OK and took the farrier
> course at Bud Beaston's Oklahoma Farriers College in Sperry, to once
> again get my butt whipped by Oklahoman, female pool players. :)
>

Very Cool (except the part about getting beat by the Oklahoman female
pool players--you probably subconsciously let them win)!

Bill

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

22/04/2010 11:55 PM


"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dedicate at least three (3), 1P-20A circuits for lighting.

I read that it's better to use 15A circuits for lighting since the wire in
lighting fixtures is comparatively fine, such wiring may get screwed up by
the time the C'Breaker switches off.

I also read one shouldn't buy the cheapest flourescent lighting fixtures one
can find as they tend to have cheap ballasters.


>
> Finally, buy a 10-2 with ground, 25 ft long molded cord set, chop off the
> receptacle end and rewire with an extra deep, 2 gang box wired with a pair
> of receptacles. It becomes your "go to" extension cord.

This sounds good.

Is this what you mean?

http://www.globalindustrial.com/p/electrical/race-ways/metal-raceways/raceway-2g-bx-xdeep-hbl500-hbl750-iv?utm_source=biz_shop&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=B218418&utm_campaign=Metal-Raceways-biz_shop&infoParam.campaignId=WZ

It's hard to tell if these are up to the task of being dragged around" on a
concrete floor.



> Lew
>
>
>

BB

"Bill"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

23/04/2010 1:18 AM


"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Lew
>

Thanks for your reply Lew.

Ns

"Nonny"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 10:24 PM

Just as a FWIW, let me admit to a minor boondoggle I did long ago.
Let's just say that I have a bit of experience as an electrician
wiring homes in the 60's, as a builder and as a woodworker.
However, I can also screw up and am not ashamed to admit it.

When I wired my own shop, I pulled in a 60a line to a load center
in my shop from my main household breaker box. I then got a
6-circuit little load center box and connected it up without much
thought. The box had 3 breakouts on the left and 3 breakouts on
the right. It was only when I began installing some tools that it
hit me like a ton of rocks: that's just 2 normal DP breakers and
2 SP breakers. In my own case, it was a simple task to pull out
the little box and substitute in a 12 circuit box with 6 knockouts
on each side. The little box became a load center on one of the
attics.

--
Nonny
When we talk to God, we're praying,
but when God talks to us,
we're schizophrenic.
What's the deal?


MH

"Martin H. Eastburn"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

23/03/2010 8:42 PM

Can the transformer be driving lights on the power poles ? Street lights ?
Just a thought.

I'd have the power company come out.

Martin

Bill wrote:
> Mike Marlow wrote:
>
>>>> There's a meter on the back of the house (behind the main panel) and
>>>> another one on a pole 40 ft from the house. Below the meter on the
>>>> pole is a small box (15A), attached by conduit, to the bottom of the
>>>> meter--no more than a 3/8" gap betweeen them.
>>> A much longer piece of conduit (3/4"-1" in diameter) comes out of the
>>> bottom of the side of the box and goes up into the back of the
>>> "transformer".
>>
>> A meter pole would often have a disconnect connected to the meter, at
>> the pole. This was/is common in trailer hookups. I'm not sure about
>> the (15A) statement you make. What do you mean by (15A)?
>
> Sorry, all I mean by 15A is that the small (6"x6") box attached directly
> below the meter on the pole has a single C'breaker inside marked 15A.
> I've been describing it so much, I got sloppy.
>
>
> It strkes me as odd that
>> that there would be a 15 Amp disconnect directly off a meter. The
>> conduit going back to the transformer could just have a ground running
>> in it.
>>
>>> I think it's possible that my shut off in inside that 2'x2'x2.5' box
>>> I mentioned earlier, it's unlocked and would be easily reachable with
>>> a ladder. Another conceivable place is inside my meter's box--which
>>> has a special clip on it.
>>
>> Unless you have a disconnect installed after your meter, you have no
>> disconnect. Disconnects are common for meter poles, and but they are
>> not necessary for a standard residential hookup. Your disconnect (in
>> normal circumstances) is the main breaker in your panel. The meter
>> head serves as the disconnect for most home wiring.
>
> Thank you for this information. Just curious, would I be likely to see a
> C'breaker inside the 2'x2'x2.5' humming steel box with a number
> coinciding with the "service number" on my meter? Although this box
> wouldn't be reachable without a short ladder, it's latch is not locked.
>
>
> Those of you who have been following this thread may find another true
> story amusing: About 2 dozen years back when I worked on Fort Sill, OK
> (home of the "Field Artillery School"), I was walking between buildings
> as I did everyday and I picked up a small thing on the ground that
> looked like a condenser (from a lawnmower), and it had 2 metal wires
> coming from it. I gave it a close exam realized it wasn't a condenser
> and untwisted the two wires (for saftety) and put it in my pocket and
> went about my work for the morning. When I got back to my office, I
> called the ordinant office and they came to visit me with "shields",
> facemasks, gloves, a great big can...geeze...I told them I carried it
> around it my pocket all morning--I wasn't skeered! It was sitting on my
> desk and I told them I wold be happy to pick it up for them! It was a
> "practice blast" used for simulating real blasts in the field, for
> training. They told me not to pick up anything else I found! ; )
>
> Bill
>

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 8:54 AM

On 3/15/2010 3:04 PM, Bill wrote:

> Install 2P-30A branch c'bkr for each 240V stationary tool along with
> a 2P-30A, non fused disconnect at (within 10ft) the tool.
>
>
> Question: So this redundancy is a good idea for 240v tools, but is not
> as important for ones powered at 120v (which are even more likely to be
> powered by conventional outlets wired in a series)?

You really don't need to install a disconnect for a dedicated circuit to
each machine in your home shop.

Is your shop in a garage?

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

kk

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 7:37 PM

On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:21:15 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Please excuse my top-posting here. I just wanted to mention that I went
>back and reread all of the responses I recieved to my post to the current
>thread a month ago and I am actively trying to incorporate some of the
>suggestions that were made into my shop design. I'm even learning a bit
>about electricity...who would have guessed that a 240v line is powered by
>two 120v lines! : )

It isn't. A 120V line is half of a 240V line. ;-)

>I've got a 240v line on the outside of the brick garage (previously used by
>an RV owner). I'd like to flip the line around for use on the inside and
>put 120v instead on the outside. I'm confident about the former, the
>latter I'll do if the outlet fixture sizes are compatible enough. Haven't
>done my homework on that yet as the idea just occurred to me a few days ago.

If there are four wires here, you can simply put a subpanel in its place and
wire 120 or 240 circuits out of it. You will be limited to the current
supported by the wire size.

>I will surely need to take down the wallboard on the uninsulated wall on one
>side of the garage for the sake of the electrical improvements. The side
>which has our kitchen on the other side surely has insulation, other
>electric, plumbing?,etc., behind it. I am less enthused about "messing"
>with that wall. I'll have to give that more thought.
>
>My current interior 220v outlet is currently pretty close to the floor.
>Does the electrical "code" cite a minimum for that?

If it's there, leave it. Does it get wet?

>BTW, I currently have 3 36" neon lamps..I think I'm going to have 6. Plugs
>in the ceiling would be convenient..

Fluorescent?

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 9:39 PM

On 3/16/2010 9:15 PM, Bill wrote:
> "Lee Michaels"<leemichaels*nadaspam*@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "Bill" wrote
>>>
>>> When the idea of adding an additional (flip) switch to each 240v
circuit
>>> was suggested that was one of my concerns--that it was something
else to
>>> go wrong, which would in turn would make it harder to isolate a
problem.
>>>
>> If you understand the layout and how to use a a multimeter, finding the
>> problem is pretty straightforward.
>>
>>> I've got an inexpensive voltimeter which has worked fine for
working with
>>> 12v in the car, but I'm not sure whether it would be prudent to plug it
>>> into a 240v outlet. I won't say I'm skeered, but I was thinking about
>>> using it with gloves! : ) I sure believe I should test any
>>> outlet before I plug a new $1000 tool into it.
>>>
>> Again, get an inexpensive multimeter. They are worth their weight in
>> gold. They have settings for 110 and 220 volts.
>
> I have a Radio Shack "8-Range Multitester " (bought new in 1979) : AC/DC
> Voltage .... 15V, 150V, 1000V
> This is the same thing you are talking about, right?

That'll work ... just make sure you set it higher than the expected
voltage your are attempting to test.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 9:37 PM

On 3/16/2010 8:49 PM, Bill wrote:
> "Swingman"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 3/16/2010 4:19 PM, Bill wrote:
>>> Swingman wrote:
>>
>>>> Don't know about your voltmeter, but ones that can be used for testing
>>>> all voltages are very inexpensive and handy to have it you're going to
>>>> be doing your own electrical work.
>>>
>>> Thanks, that's what I wanted to hear. I'm going to have to learn to use
>>> mine "better" before I plug it into high voltage...
>>
>> Only 120v use, but I carry one of these in the toolkit in my truck at all
>> times ... and in my pocket during electrical inspections in houses I'm
>> building. Mostly to insure that circuits are live and wired correctly, but
>> also to verify to an inspector that a circuit is indeed GFCI protected
>> (you don't always know where the GFCI receptacle upstream is located)
>>
>> http://www.tripplite.com/EN/products/model.cfm?txtmodelID=3941
>>
>
>
> Hmm...I have one of those too. The fine print at the link says "not for use
> with Ground Fault Interrupt -GFI outlets".

Sorry, I grabbed the wrong link. This is the one I have:

http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/22-2000&CAWELAID=220252111

And a cheaper one that does the same thing:

http://inspectusa.com/receptaclegfci-circuit-tester-110vac-ectgfik-with-indicators-p-123.html

The GFCI outlet/receptacle itself (it has its own, built-in test circuit).

The other one is used to test that same built-in test circuit in the
GFCI receptacle, but FROM those receptacles which are on the
"downstream" side (those coming off the "load" terminals on the GFCI
receptacle).

> So you show an outlet is GFCI protected by checking another outlet
> downstream (I've read that a GFCI breaker
> is often put on the first outlet off a line)? So, I take it that of the
> device an outlet properly grounded, and it's not directly grounded, then it
> must have been done upstream with GFCI? GFCI is one of those things I need
> to read up on...

You can use a GFCI receptacle in an outlet by itself, or use it as the
first one inline in a circuit (power in connected to the "line"
terminals; power out connected to the "Load" terminals) to protect the
other receptacles "downstream" of it.

Read up on it ....

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

17/03/2010 6:38 AM

On 3/17/2010 1:20 AM, Bill wrote:
> I copied& pasted below from:
> http://www.handymanclub.com/Projects/Project.aspx?id=20483
> (We've given The HandyMan Club a bad rap here--but they had a decent
> article).
>
> I quote:
> "When determining where to install a subpanel, be sure to follow the
> National Electrical Code (NEC) requirements. In front of the subpanel, you’ll
> need free working space that’s 36 in. deep and at least as wide as the
> subpanel (or 30 in. wide — whichever is greater). The space above the panel
> must be completely open to the structural ceiling (no shelving, etc.), and
> the space below must be open to the floor (no lawnmowers, trash cans,
> workbenches, etc.)."
>
>
> Am I to understand from this that if a subpanel is mounted flush on a wall,
> that nothing is to be place in FRONT of it (ever)? It comes down to where
> it is written: "the space below must be open to the floor"---does that refer
> to the space directly below the subpanel or include the 36" in front of it
> mentioned earlier. Otherwise, I'd have what--a fire violation?


It's a 10-4 that you would have an "electrical code violation",

That said, when the inspector leaves most home owners go ahead and make
a clothes closet out of that "machine room" .... if you now what I mean. :)

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

kk

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

14/03/2010 11:39 PM

On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:26:29 -0400, "Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>>>My current interior 220v outlet is currently pretty close to the floor.
>>>Does the electrical "code" cite a minimum for that?
>>
>> If it's there, leave it. Does it get wet?
>
>It's just 6" off of the ground. It doesn't get wet.

That is pretty low, but I wouldn't mess with it unless you have to move/rewire
it for some other reason.

>>>BTW, I currently have 3 36" neon lamps..I think I'm going to have 6.
>>>Plugs
>>>in the ceiling would be convenient..
>>
>> Fluorescent?
>
>Yes, What a strangely spelled word (I checked)!

:-)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 3:19 PM

On 3/16/2010 1:55 PM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
> "Swingman" wrote:
>
>
>> There is one gotcha to watch for when using a 220 c'bkr in a load
>> center which, by design, can be used with both full size and mini
>> breakers:
>>
>> When using these load centers it is possible to insert the full size
>> 220/240v c'bkr into two adjacent slots that are both fed by one hot
>> leg ... the result being that you will get no voltage to the tool
>> whatsoever.
> <snip>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Only if you try to cut corners.
>
> A 2P c'bkr has a built in key that prohibits installing the c'bkr in
> an improper location.

Not necessarily with all brands ... I'm looking at a box of NEW GE 2p's
from HD that will fit in any two slots in a 12/24 panel.

Absolutely no doubt about it ...

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MM

Mike M

in reply to Swingman on 16/03/2010 3:19 PM

18/03/2010 11:58 PM

On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:36:04 -0500, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 3/18/2010 11:26 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
>> "Swingman" wrote:
>>
>>> Lew ... I want to apologize to you for the "tone" in this post and
>>> the direction it's been taking. I regretted the escalation the
>>> second I hit the send button.
>>>
>>> Though I have to disagree on this particular issue, I've nothing but
>>> the utmost respect for your knowledge and experience.
>>>
>>> mea culpa ...
>>>
>>> BTW, this does NOT apply to politics!<g,d& r> :)
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Accepted as given.
>>
>> NBD, I chalk it up to your "Big Bad Wolf" mode.
>>
>> Sometimes you huff and you puff...........
>
>LOL ... I know a certain blond that would agree with you without
>reservation. :)

I would love to see this with full size breakers. But as I said
earlier I have learned that I haven't seen it all yet. For the record
yor were totally considerate in your disagreement. Electricity isn't
like water where you can see the problem. It can be another example
of horses and zebras. Using test equipment paticurarly with 3 phase a
lot of problems can cause misleading meter readings. If I followed an
earlier thread properly, your blond is quite an impressive and
accomplished person.

Mike M

DI

"Dave In Texas"

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 9:30 AM



"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> You really don't need to install a disconnect for a dedicated circuit to
> each machine in your home shop.

When I wired my garshop I did two separate 240v circuits; one runs the
dust collector and the other the table saw and a 5hp compressor (neither of
which ever runs congruently). How often do you run more than one device at
a time?
Additionally, I ran four 120v circuits, two for power tools with
each wall having a mix of both circuits and a single circuit each for the
freezer and a "beer box."

Dave in Houston

Sk

Swingman

in reply to "Bill" on 14/03/2010 3:21 AM

16/03/2010 3:25 PM

On 3/16/2010 11:53 AM, Bill wrote:
> dpb wrote:
>> Swingman wrote:
>>> On 3/16/2010 9:12 AM, dpb wrote:
>>>
>>>> And a separate circuit for every stationary tool unless you're a
>>>> production shop w/ an employee at every workstation continuously
>>>> through
>>>> a shift is _WAY_ over the top overkill...
>>>
>>> There may be one advantage (albeit slight) to wiring a "dedicated
>>> circuit" for a stationary tool, particularly in shops in "garages"
>>> ... a "dedicated circuit" is exempt from being GFCI protected in many
>>> locales.
>>>
>>> At one time in the early days of GFCI, it was worth doing so as to
>>> not have to deal with nuisance trips, which are no longer the problem
>>> they once were.
>>
>> That _is_ one of the later NEC items I do tend to ignore in
>> non-wet/indoor locations like a shop...probably the most common one ,
>> in fact. :)
>>
>> Bill should, of course, follow local Code requirements (disclaimer :) )
>>
>
> Having recently purchased my home, I think it is the case that our local
> code (central IN) requires GFCI on outlets within a short distance of a
> sink/bath except older homes may be grandfathered out of this
> requirement. However, needless to say, I am not an expert.

Besides kitchens and bathroom, most locales require GFCI protected
circuits in "garages" also ... a place where you, strangely enough, find
most woodworking "shops" these days. :)

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)


You’ve reached the end of replies