On 8/29/2012 9:54 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
> Dr. Deb wrote:
>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>
>>> The Real Romney
>>>
>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
>>> romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>>>
>>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
>>
>>
>> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>>
>> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane, moronic,
>> etc, yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements of humor. It
>> isn't even a good roast.
>>
>> Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes tells
>> you a lot about the paper. But then others, recently, have said it
>> already.
>>
> What is "twaddle"?
>
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/twaddle :
a : silly idle talk : drivel
b : something insignificant or worthless : nonsense <that idea is pure
twaddle>
On 8/30/2012 4:20 PM, John H. Gohde wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2:38 pm, Just Wondering <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 8/29/2012 9:54 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Dr. Deb wrote:
>>>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>>>> The Real Romney
>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
>>>>> romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>>>>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
>>>> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>>>> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane, moronic,
>>>> etc, yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements of humor. It
>>>> isn't even a good roast.
>>>> Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes tells
>>>> you a lot about the paper. But then others, recently, have said it
>>>> already.
>>> What is "twaddle"?
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/twaddle:
>> a : silly idle talk : drivel
>> b : something insignificant or worthless : nonsense <that idea is pure
>> twaddle>
>
> Now, don't go trying those brain farts on us again.
There goes not-so-Gohde, shaming his mother again with more twaddle.
Lew Hodgett wrote:
> The Real Romney
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>
> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane, moronic, etc,
yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements of humor. It isn't even
a good roast.
Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes tells you a
lot about the paper. But then others, recently, have said it already.
Deb
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> The Real Romney
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-romney.html?_
> r=1&emc=eta1.
>
> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
I too thought it was funny.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Gordon Shumway <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:54:51 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Dr. Deb wrote:
>>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Real Romney
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
>>>> romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>>>>
>>>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>>>
>>> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane, moronic,
>>> etc, yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements of humor. It
>>> isn't even a good roast.
>>>
>>> Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes tells
>>> you a lot about the paper. But then others, recently, have said it
>>> already.
>>>
>>
>>What is "twaddle"?
>
> If you look it up in the dictionary all you will find is a picture of
> Lew. BTW, you'll also find his picture in the dictionary under
> racist, loon, bigot and many other similar adjectives.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/twaddle
As far as the other namecalling, whomsoever fits the shoe, wear it, twit.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Gordon Shumway <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On 29 Aug 2012 17:33:14 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Gordon Shumway <[email protected]> wrote in
>>news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:54:51 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dr. Deb wrote:
>>>>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The Real Romney
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
>>>>>> romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane,
>>>>> moronic, etc, yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements
>>>>> of humor. It isn't even a good roast.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes
>>>>> tells you a lot about the paper. But then others, recently, have
>>>>> said it already.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What is "twaddle"?
>>>
>>> If you look it up in the dictionary all you will find is a picture
>>> of Lew. BTW, you'll also find his picture in the dictionary under
>>> racist, loon, bigot and many other similar adjectives.
>>
>>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/twaddle
>>As far as the other namecalling, whomsoever fits the shoe, wear it,
>>twit.
>
> Twit? Hardly. I'm shocked that you would stoop to name calling. I
> was merely stating facts based on Lew's history of posts, that's all.
You're calling Lew all kinds of things. I did look up twaddle in an
online dictionary (several in fact) and I didn't see a picture of Lew or
anyone else. Lew may have different political opinions than you, but
then you started the namecalling, twit.
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Gordon Shumway <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On 29 Aug 2012 20:39:11 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Gordon Shumway <[email protected]> wrote in
>>news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> On 29 Aug 2012 17:33:14 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Gordon Shumway <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>news:[email protected]:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:54:51 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Dr. Deb wrote:
>>>>>>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Real Romney
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
>>>>>>>> romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane,
>>>>>>> moronic, etc, yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements
>>>>>>> of humor. It isn't even a good roast.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes
>>>>>>> tells you a lot about the paper. But then others, recently,
>>>>>>> have said it already.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What is "twaddle"?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you look it up in the dictionary all you will find is a picture
>>>>> of Lew. BTW, you'll also find his picture in the dictionary under
>>>>> racist, loon, bigot and many other similar adjectives.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/twaddle
>>>>As far as the other namecalling, whomsoever fits the shoe, wear it,
>>>>twit.
>>>
>>> Twit? Hardly. I'm shocked that you would stoop to name calling. I
>>> was merely stating facts based on Lew's history of posts, that's
>>> all.
>>
>>You're calling Lew all kinds of things. I did look up twaddle in an
>>online dictionary (several in fact) and I didn't see a picture of Lew
>>or anyone else. Lew may have different political opinions than you,
>>but then you started the namecalling, twit.
>
> Take a look back, maybe a year or so, when Lew was calling everyone
> who disagreed with him a "pathetic bigot" and you will see who started
> the name calling. You may apologize if you wish, but I doubt that is
> part of your character.
OK, I'll apologize. Sometimes I go and do look back, but a year? With
people who post as much? I'll take your word for it, Gordon, whether or
not I'd agree with Lew. Yes, that is a pretty lame apology, I know.
Because I often agree with Lew, whether or not I specifically say so (not
always, but often - hey I even sometimes disagree with Karl!).
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Jack <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
> On 8/29/2012 5:03 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
>> Han wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You're calling Lew all kinds of things. I did look up twaddle in an
>>> online dictionary (several in fact) and I didn't see a picture of
>>> Lew or anyone else. Lew may have different political opinions than
>>> you, but then you started the namecalling, twit.
>>
>> I don't get it - and they call me argumentative. I guess it's all in
>> who you are...
>
> I'd say, in the twaddle of one world famous twit, "it depends on your
> definition of" argumentative!
>
> Personally, I'm amused by one guy calling another a twit, whilst
> admonishing the other for name calling... Pretty good stuff.
Wow, somebody got the irony of my post !!!
--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid
Han wrote:
>
> You're calling Lew all kinds of things. I did look up twaddle in an
> online dictionary (several in fact) and I didn't see a picture of Lew
> or anyone else. Lew may have different political opinions than you,
> but then you started the namecalling, twit.
I don't get it - and they call me argumentative. I guess it's all in who
you are...
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
Dr. Deb wrote:
> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>
>> The Real Romney
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
>> romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>>
>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
>
>
>
> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>
> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane, moronic,
> etc, yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements of humor. It
> isn't even a good roast.
>
> Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes tells
> you a lot about the paper. But then others, recently, have said it
> already.
>
What is "twaddle"?
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On Aug 29, 2:38=A0pm, Just Wondering <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/29/2012 9:54 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dr. Deb wrote:
> >> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>
> >>> The Real Romney
>
> >>>http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
> >>> romney.html?_r=3D1&emc=3Deta1.
>
> >>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! =A0[I don't care who you are]
>
> >> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>
> >> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. =A0Inane, moronic,
> >> etc, yes. =A0However, it lacks all the essential elements of humor. =
=A0It
> >> isn't even a good roast.
>
> >> Its just twaddle. =A0That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes tells
> >> you a lot about the paper. =A0But then others, recently, have said it
> >> already.
>
> > What is "twaddle"?
>
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/twaddle:
> a : silly idle talk : drivel
> b : something insignificant or worthless : nonsense <that idea is pure
> twaddle>
Now, don't go trying those brain farts on us again.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:54:51 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Dr. Deb wrote:
>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>
>>> The Real Romney
>>>
>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
>>> romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>>>
>>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
>>
>>
>>
>> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>>
>> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane, moronic,
>> etc, yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements of humor. It
>> isn't even a good roast.
>>
>> Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes tells
>> you a lot about the paper. But then others, recently, have said it
>> already.
>>
>
>What is "twaddle"?
If you look it up in the dictionary all you will find is a picture of
Lew. BTW, you'll also find his picture in the dictionary under
racist, loon, bigot and many other similar adjectives.
On 29 Aug 2012 17:33:14 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>Gordon Shumway <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:[email protected]:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:54:51 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Dr. Deb wrote:
>>>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The Real Romney
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
>>>>> romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>>>>>
>>>>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane, moronic,
>>>> etc, yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements of humor. It
>>>> isn't even a good roast.
>>>>
>>>> Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes tells
>>>> you a lot about the paper. But then others, recently, have said it
>>>> already.
>>>>
>>>
>>>What is "twaddle"?
>>
>> If you look it up in the dictionary all you will find is a picture of
>> Lew. BTW, you'll also find his picture in the dictionary under
>> racist, loon, bigot and many other similar adjectives.
>
>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/twaddle
>As far as the other namecalling, whomsoever fits the shoe, wear it, twit.
Twit? Hardly. I'm shocked that you would stoop to name calling. I
was merely stating facts based on Lew's history of posts, that's all.
On 8/29/2012 5:03 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
> Han wrote:
>
>>
>> You're calling Lew all kinds of things. I did look up twaddle in an
>> online dictionary (several in fact) and I didn't see a picture of Lew
>> or anyone else. Lew may have different political opinions than you,
>> but then you started the namecalling, twit.
>
> I don't get it - and they call me argumentative. I guess it's all in who
> you are...
I'd say, in the twaddle of one world famous twit, "it depends on your
definition of" argumentative!
Personally, I'm amused by one guy calling another a twit, whilst
admonishing the other for name calling... Pretty good stuff.
--
Jack
Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life.
http://jbstein.com
On 29 Aug 2012 20:39:11 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>Gordon Shumway <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:[email protected]:
>
>> On 29 Aug 2012 17:33:14 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Gordon Shumway <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>news:[email protected]:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:54:51 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Dr. Deb wrote:
>>>>>> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Real Romney
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/opinion/brooks-the-real-
>>>>>>> romney.html?_r=1&emc=eta1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> THIS HERE'S FUNNEEEE ! [I don't care who you are]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You know to some this is funny but to me it is twaddle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, I know he was trying to be funny, but it isn't. Inane,
>>>>>> moronic, etc, yes. However, it lacks all the essential elements
>>>>>> of humor. It isn't even a good roast.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Its just twaddle. That it made it to the pages of the NYTimes
>>>>>> tells you a lot about the paper. But then others, recently, have
>>>>>> said it already.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>What is "twaddle"?
>>>>
>>>> If you look it up in the dictionary all you will find is a picture
>>>> of Lew. BTW, you'll also find his picture in the dictionary under
>>>> racist, loon, bigot and many other similar adjectives.
>>>
>>>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/twaddle
>>>As far as the other namecalling, whomsoever fits the shoe, wear it,
>>>twit.
>>
>> Twit? Hardly. I'm shocked that you would stoop to name calling. I
>> was merely stating facts based on Lew's history of posts, that's all.
>
>You're calling Lew all kinds of things. I did look up twaddle in an
>online dictionary (several in fact) and I didn't see a picture of Lew or
>anyone else. Lew may have different political opinions than you, but
>then you started the namecalling, twit.
Take a look back, maybe a year or so, when Lew was calling everyone
who disagreed with him a "pathetic bigot" and you will see who started
the name calling. You may apologize if you wish, but I doubt that is
part of your character.
On 30 Aug 2012 11:26:21 GMT, Han <[email protected]> wrote:
>OK, I'll apologize. Sometimes I go and do look back, but a year? With
>people who post as much? I'll take your word for it, Gordon, whether or
>not I'd agree with Lew. Yes, that is a pretty lame apology, I know.
>Because I often agree with Lew, whether or not I specifically say so (not
>always, but often - hey I even sometimes disagree with Karl!).
>--
>Best regards
>Han
>email address is invalid
Apology accepted. Lame is better than nothing :-)