In article <[email protected]>, Swingman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, but is it as outdated as it appears on the surface (4-10 year
> period)?
Yes. Even the main link at the end of the article was last updated in
2000.
--
~ Stay Calm... Be Brave... Wait for the Signs ~
------------------------------------------------------
One site: <http://www.balderstone.ca>
The other site, with ww links<http://www.woodenwabbits.com>
"New Wave Dave" wrote in message
>
> "Swingman" wrote in message
>
> > "New Wave Dave" wrote in message
> >> Here's that link to the photo.net primer on slide scanners. FWIW.
> >> http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/scanners/primer
> >
> > Thanks, but is it as outdated as it appears on the surface (4-10 year
> > period)?
>
> I see your point but I wouldn't know. It was just a starting point.
That it is. No problem ... I appreciate you taking the time. Thanks!
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 12/13/05
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "New Wave Dave" wrote in message
>> Here's that link to the photo.net primer on slide scanners. FWIW.
>> http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/scanners/primer
>
> Thanks, but is it as outdated as it appears on the surface (4-10 year
> period)?
I see your point but I wouldn't know. It was just a starting point.
--
"New Wave" Dave In Houston