Just something that will hopefully spark a friendly discussion...
I was watching this episode of How It's Made this morning:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-18nLL-z9v4
They open the segment with the words "use ... traditional furniture construction
techniques." Let's call them TFCT.
We can all agree that mortise and tenon joinery is a TFCT.
We can all agree that steam bending is a TFCT.
Let's consider "mortise and tenon" techniques. We've moved from chisels to
foot operator mortisers to computer controlled mortisers as shown in the
video. Is creating mortises and tenons with the assistance of a computer
still considered a TFCT?
Let's consider "steam bending" techniques. We've moved from home made jigs,
manual clamps and multiple days of dry time to devices that use radio
frequencies to dry thick pieces of wood to a precise moisture content in
1 hour.
The question is: When have we left TFCT behind? Do we simply say "The
fact that the chair was constructed with mortise and tenon joinery and
steam bent parts means that TFCT were used" or do we say "Improvements, efficiencies and high tech devices have removed the use of TFCT from
this chair build"?
On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 9:20:27 AM UTC-5, dpb wrote:
> "Traditional" comes from about the 18th century or somewhat earlier.
>=20
> If they would have had access to the tools and power sources we have,=20
> you think they wouldn't have jumped to them in a heartbeat?
>=20
> In that case, we'd then have a wholly different definition of what it=20
> means to be traditional.
Absolutely. This is some well chewed sausage among my fellow woodworkers a=
nd has been for decades. When I started in the trades full time over 40 ye=
ars ago I had to learn how to drive nails all day long, from 3d when I was =
installing paneling and trims to 16d duplex for concrete forms. Now I have=
guys in their 40s that work for me that think it is "old school" to drill =
a pilot hole for a nail and drive the nail in a small trim job rather than =
to get the compressor out, hook it up, get out the air hose, oil the gun, t=
hen make sure they have the right sized brads. Not to mention carrying com=
pressor, etc., out the job.
We used to drive screws with "Yankee" drivers, too. Then in the mid 70s wh=
en we started doing metal framing, we used heavy duty variable speed drills=
. Now the norm for driving screws into wood has taken another step, and ch=
eap impact drivers are a must.
Same thing with building a "one off" cabinet. I have "professional" woodwo=
rkers that I would put their end product up against just about anyone that =
cannot build a cabinet without a table saw of some sort. They think I have =
some kind of specialized Jedi training to be able to build cabinets with a =
circular saw, miter saw, and a router. You should see their faces when I t=
ell them there was such a thing as a non powered miter saw.
Technology will always move the professional woodworking along. The old fo=
lks like me will piss and moan about the loss of certain skills and how tal=
entless the help we have to hire is these days. But OTOH, now a helper can =
screw off a deck surface, a guy with a few hours of experience can nail off=
house roof decking (it took me more than six months to be able to drive na=
ils all day)using a few thousand nails a day. So the payoff is faster, mor=
e affordable work with a less interested or well trained staff.=20
Take a look at some of the superb work we have seen here. I have had the p=
leasure of becoming a friend of Leon's, and his work is even more impressiv=
e in person than it is in pictures. Yet, how much of that incredible joine=
ry could he do in a timely manner without the machines to do it? What if h=
e had to stop and correctly sharpen a rabbet plane three or four times duri=
ng the build process? What if he was trying to mimic the Domino with throu=
gh mortises by using a hammer/drill/chisel for every single connector? Wha=
t about the time, effort and expertise needed to make some of the joinery w=
e see on a raised panel door, and imagine that being done with a SERIES of =
planes and devices.
The payoff? As a professional, Leon has invested the time, money and dedic=
ation to learn to use the best technology to its best use. When I was buil=
ding cabinets (yes, back in the 70s when I was building kitchens full of ca=
bs I had a table saw) it took us about twice as long to get the job done as=
it would Leon, and we did have some component failures that required a "re=
-do" if the end product wasn't up to snuff. It used to take us (my partner=
of equal skills) about a month to build kitchen/bath/utility cabinets for =
a house. Now, someone like Leon can turn out a consistently better product=
>>by himself<< in about half the time.
Technology brings speed, repeatability, and less chance for failure over re=
lying on hand/eye skills that take years to develop.
Over the last couple of decades or so, I have noticed that the only ones th=
at miss the "old ways" are the ones that have never relied on their efforts=
to pay their mortgages, truck payments, medical bills, etc.
With that in mind, I think there are "old ways" of doing things, not necess=
arily better just because it was the way your great grandfather did it. Th=
e definition of tradition itself doesn't apply to woodworking since it is a=
craft that evolves, rather than staying stuck in the mire caused by lack o=
f innovation.
Robert
On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 2:20:09 PM UTC-4, Leon wrote:
> On 7/16/2017 9:43 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > Just something that will hopefully spark a friendly discussion...
> >
> > I was watching this episode of How It's Made this morning:
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-18nLL-z9v4
> >
> > They open the segment with the words "use ... traditional furniture construction
> > techniques." Let's call them TFCT.
> >
> > We can all agree that mortise and tenon joinery is a TFCT.
> > We can all agree that steam bending is a TFCT.
> >
> > Let's consider "mortise and tenon" techniques. We've moved from chisels to
> > foot operator mortisers to computer controlled mortisers as shown in the
> > video. Is creating mortises and tenons with the assistance of a computer
> > still considered a TFCT?
> >
> > Let's consider "steam bending" techniques. We've moved from home made jigs,
> > manual clamps and multiple days of dry time to devices that use radio
> > frequencies to dry thick pieces of wood to a precise moisture content in
> > 1 hour.
> >
> > The question is: When have we left TFCT behind? Do we simply say "The
> > fact that the chair was constructed with mortise and tenon joinery and
> > steam bent parts means that TFCT were used" or do we say "Improvements, efficiencies and high tech devices have removed the use of TFCT from
> > this chair build"?
> >
> >
> 3
>
> I read TFCT as the construction style not the construction tools that
> are used.
So you don't include the making of the parts as "construction", just the
assembly?
OK, I'll give you that. Do you consider the use of the power stapler as TFCT?
Hmmm!? Traditional craftsman - one who uses what tools and skills he has t=
o do the best job he can do.... on the particular project.
To me, traditional means putting one's heart and soul into one's work. It=
's the person's work. Production (mass production), to me, lacks that pers=
onal effort, pride, etc., to show a particular person's work, hence lacks "=
tradition" (historical sense?) of any kind.
And, if I can include, I like to think some of my old salvaged wood has th=
e character and history that lends itself to my idea of "traditional sense =
and work". I kinna give it a human quality, in that, it has survived this =
long, intact, so it needs to be respected by becoming a good/better/best (d=
ifferent?) project.... and I try to make it so.
Traditional technique is a person's personal effort, not the result of the =
tools used, whether new or old tools. And I'm speaking of good quality wo=
rk....
Piss poor sloppy work can be traditional for some folks, like for one or tw=
o of my nephews, despite my efforts to try to coach them otherwise.
Sonny
On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 4:20:01 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
> Dr. Deb wrote:
> >
> > To be honest, I can see nothing of traditional craftsmanship in the video. While they do use mortise and tenons, all that you really wind up with is a factory built chair.
> >
>
> I watched the video and heard the term "engineering".
When?
On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 11:10:42 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 9:20:27 AM UTC-5, dpb wrote:
>=20
> > "Traditional" comes from about the 18th century or somewhat earlier.
> >=20
> > If they would have had access to the tools and power sources we have,=
=20
> > you think they wouldn't have jumped to them in a heartbeat?
> >=20
> > In that case, we'd then have a wholly different definition of what it=
=20
> > means to be traditional.
>=20
> Absolutely. This is some well chewed sausage among my fellow woodworkers=
and has been for decades. When I started in the trades full time over 40 =
years ago I had to learn how to drive nails all day long, from 3d when I wa=
s installing paneling and trims to 16d duplex for concrete forms. Now I ha=
ve guys in their 40s that work for me that think it is "old school" to dril=
l a pilot hole for a nail and drive the nail in a small trim job rather tha=
n to get the compressor out, hook it up, get out the air hose, oil the gun,=
then make sure they have the right sized brads. Not to mention carrying c=
ompressor, etc., out the job.
>=20
> We used to drive screws with "Yankee" drivers, too. Then in the mid 70s =
when we started doing metal framing, we used heavy duty variable speed dril=
ls. Now the norm for driving screws into wood has taken another step, and =
cheap impact drivers are a must.
>=20
> Same thing with building a "one off" cabinet. I have "professional" wood=
workers that I would put their end product up against just about anyone tha=
t cannot build a cabinet without a table saw of some sort. They think I hav=
e some kind of specialized Jedi training to be able to build cabinets with =
a circular saw, miter saw, and a router. You should see their faces when I=
tell them there was such a thing as a non powered miter saw.
>=20
> Technology will always move the professional woodworking along. The old =
folks like me will piss and moan about the loss of certain skills and how t=
alentless the help we have to hire is these days. But OTOH, now a helper ca=
n screw off a deck surface, a guy with a few hours of experience can nail o=
ff house roof decking (it took me more than six months to be able to drive =
nails all day)using a few thousand nails a day. So the payoff is faster, m=
ore affordable work with a less interested or well trained staff.=20
>=20
> Take a look at some of the superb work we have seen here. I have had the=
pleasure of becoming a friend of Leon's, and his work is even more impress=
ive in person than it is in pictures. Yet, how much of that incredible joi=
nery could he do in a timely manner without the machines to do it? What if=
he had to stop and correctly sharpen a rabbet plane three or four times du=
ring the build process? What if he was trying to mimic the Domino with thr=
ough mortises by using a hammer/drill/chisel for every single connector? W=
hat about the time, effort and expertise needed to make some of the joinery=
we see on a raised panel door, and imagine that being done with a SERIES o=
f planes and devices.
>=20
> The payoff? As a professional, Leon has invested the time, money and ded=
ication to learn to use the best technology to its best use. When I was bu=
ilding cabinets (yes, back in the 70s when I was building kitchens full of =
cabs I had a table saw) it took us about twice as long to get the job done =
as it would Leon, and we did have some component failures that required a "=
re-do" if the end product wasn't up to snuff. It used to take us (my partn=
er of equal skills) about a month to build kitchen/bath/utility cabinets fo=
r a house. Now, someone like Leon can turn out a consistently better produ=
ct >>by himself<< in about half the time.
>=20
> Technology brings speed, repeatability, and less chance for failure over =
relying on hand/eye skills that take years to develop.
>=20
> Over the last couple of decades or so, I have noticed that the only ones =
that miss the "old ways" are the ones that have never relied on their effor=
ts to pay their mortgages, truck payments, medical bills, etc.
>=20
> With that in mind, I think there are "old ways" of doing things, not nece=
ssarily better just because it was the way your great grandfather did it. =
The definition of tradition itself doesn't apply to woodworking since it is=
a craft that evolves, rather than staying stuck in the mire caused by lack=
of innovation.
>=20
> Robert
Yep and several similar points, made by others, apply, as well. My previou=
s mention of craftsman was meant to mean hobbyist (as I), more so than prof=
essional. =20
I don't do woodwork to pay bills, but I like doing some things by hand and =
with old hand/manual tools *when convenient and/or *for a particular projec=
t. It gives me, personally, a sense of "traditional" work. The definiti=
on seems to be multifaceted, with one being that it is relative to each, ou=
rselves, and how we, each, perceive to practice "it".
******************************************************************
Traditional Project?
I have an old hand made settee to upholster for a friend. It's of neat co=
nstruction elements, one being a particular joint feature of the 1820s, the=
re abouts. It is a feature that IDs an original Bergere chair vs a reprod=
uction. This feature aids in the upholstering, around this particular par=
t of the seat/arm. There are old cut nails in its construction, as well. =
*I don't think the nails are of earlier, hand wrought vintage. The face b=
oards have simple carved designs.
All the joints were loose or had some disjointing issues. I have it almos=
t completely disassembled. Some parts/joints are already repaired/reatta=
ched. I've thought to build one for myself, so I've taken lots of pics, e=
tc.
If any of you would like to see it, possibly to make one for yourself, I'll=
post pics. I think it would be fairly easy to reproduce, including the s=
imple carvings, even for a novice/hobbyist. It's a quaint little seat, sm=
aller than a typical settee and would make a neat gift for a young girl's r=
oom or the like. Probably the only things you, as a woodworker, may not b=
e familiar with is obtaining/installing a set of springs and doing a bit of=
upholstery, but the simplicity of this seat makes for those issues not to =
be a major problem for just about anyone, especially with a little coaching=
.
If you're considering a traditional(?) project, this might be a candidate f=
or you.
*It's made of walnut (exposed woodwork) and she wants to paint it, before I=
upholster it. Non-exposed wood is poplar.
Sonny
On 7/16/2017 9:43 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> Just something that will hopefully spark a friendly discussion...
>
> I was watching this episode of How It's Made this morning:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-18nLL-z9v4
>
> They open the segment with the words "use ... traditional furniture construction
> techniques." Let's call them TFCT.
>
> We can all agree that mortise and tenon joinery is a TFCT.
> We can all agree that steam bending is a TFCT.
>
> Let's consider "mortise and tenon" techniques. We've moved from chisels to
> foot operator mortisers to computer controlled mortisers as shown in the
> video. Is creating mortises and tenons with the assistance of a computer
> still considered a TFCT?
>
> Let's consider "steam bending" techniques. We've moved from home made jigs,
> manual clamps and multiple days of dry time to devices that use radio
> frequencies to dry thick pieces of wood to a precise moisture content in
> 1 hour.
>
> The question is: When have we left TFCT behind? Do we simply say "The
> fact that the chair was constructed with mortise and tenon joinery and
> steam bent parts means that TFCT were used" or do we say "Improvements, efficiencies and high tech devices have removed the use of TFCT from
> this chair build"?
>
>
3
I read TFCT as the construction style not the construction tools that
are used.
On 7/17/2017 10:56 AM, John McGaw wrote:
> On 7/16/2017 4:26 PM, notbob wrote:
>> On 2017-07-16, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Whatever you say, sellers will always say it was made "by hand". : )
>>
>> I love it when some "artisan" distiller claims their spirit (in this
>> case, vodka) is "hand made". ....as if! ;)
>>
>> nb
>>
>
> And, don't forget, 'gluten-free' as if gluten could find its way into
> what is basically ethanol and water.
Handmade is when you squeeze the wheat the right way so the vodka comes
out but the gluten stays. Takes years to learn the craft.
From what I've found, hand made is a rather nebulous term. I guess if
you weigh out the ingredients by scooping you qualify as hand made.
This post was hand crafted by an artisan typist.
On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:43:48 AM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> Just something that will hopefully spark a friendly discussion...
>
> I was watching this episode of How It's Made this morning:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-18nLL-z9v4
>
> They open the segment with the words "use ... traditional furniture construction
> techniques." Let's call them TFCT.
>
> We can all agree that mortise and tenon joinery is a TFCT.
> We can all agree that steam bending is a TFCT.
>
> Let's consider "mortise and tenon" techniques. We've moved from chisels to
> foot operator mortisers to computer controlled mortisers as shown in the
> video. Is creating mortises and tenons with the assistance of a computer
> still considered a TFCT?
>
> Let's consider "steam bending" techniques. We've moved from home made jigs,
> manual clamps and multiple days of dry time to devices that use radio
> frequencies to dry thick pieces of wood to a precise moisture content in
> 1 hour.
>
> The question is: When have we left TFCT behind? Do we simply say "The
> fact that the chair was constructed with mortise and tenon joinery and
> steam bent parts means that TFCT were used" or do we say "Improvements, efficiencies and high tech devices have removed the use of TFCT from
> this chair build"?
To be honest, I can see nothing of traditional craftsmanship in the video. While they do use mortise and tenons, all that you really wind up with is a factory built chair.
This is "real" TFCT (get ready for your dose of humility - at least it is for me)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hd4Juc4fYjw
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:28:50 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:
>On 7/16/2017 2:58 PM, Dr. Deb wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:43:48 AM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> Just something that will hopefully spark a friendly discussion...
>>>
>>> I was watching this episode of How It's Made this morning:
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-18nLL-z9v4
>>>
>>> They open the segment with the words "use ... traditional furniture construction
>>> techniques." Let's call them TFCT.
>>>
>>> We can all agree that mortise and tenon joinery is a TFCT.
>>> We can all agree that steam bending is a TFCT.
>>>
>>> Let's consider "mortise and tenon" techniques. We've moved from chisels to
>>> foot operator mortisers to computer controlled mortisers as shown in the
>>> video. Is creating mortises and tenons with the assistance of a computer
>>> still considered a TFCT?
>>>
>>> Let's consider "steam bending" techniques. We've moved from home made jigs,
>>> manual clamps and multiple days of dry time to devices that use radio
>>> frequencies to dry thick pieces of wood to a precise moisture content in
>>> 1 hour.
>>>
>>> The question is: When have we left TFCT behind? Do we simply say "The
>>> fact that the chair was constructed with mortise and tenon joinery and
>>> steam bent parts means that TFCT were used" or do we say "Improvements, efficiencies and high tech devices have removed the use of TFCT from
>>> this chair build"?
>>
>> To be honest, I can see nothing of traditional craftsmanship in the video. While they do use mortise and tenons, all that you really wind up with is a factory built chair.
>>
>> This is "real" TFCT (get ready for your dose of humility - at least it is for me)
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hd4Juc4fYjw
>>
>
>
>Pretty good but he did use a bench top mortiser and a band saw. He used
>hand planes but sometimes I sand by hand. ;~)
Yeah, I thought the Festool hand sander was pretty funny. ;-)
On 2017-07-16, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Whatever you say, sellers will always say it was made "by hand". : )
I love it when some "artisan" distiller claims their spirit (in this
case, vodka) is "hand made". ....as if! ;)
nb
On 7/16/2017 4:26 PM, notbob wrote:
> On 2017-07-16, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Whatever you say, sellers will always say it was made "by hand". : )
>
> I love it when some "artisan" distiller claims their spirit (in this
> case, vodka) is "hand made". ....as if! ;)
>
> nb
>
And, don't forget, 'gluten-free' as if gluten could find its way into what
is basically ethanol and water.
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:10:35 -0500, dpb <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 07/19/2017 12:56 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
>...
>
>> Its been pointed out to me that no traditional wood furniture would be
>> complete with out a woven leather seat. Of course before you can chew
>> the leather to soften it you must first dry and cure it with traditional
>> intestinal flora curing methods after chasing it down on foot and
>> bashing it in the skull with the femur of an antelope.
>
>And it's getting that _first_ femur that's the real trick... :)
Well were are back to traditional wood working you need to make an
atlatl to get that first femur.
notbob;3947563 Wrote:
> On 2017-07-16, Bill [email protected] wrote:
> -
> Whatever you say, sellers will always say it was made "by hand". : )-
>
> I love it when some "artisan" distiller claims their spirit (in this
> case, vodka) is "hand made". ....as if! ;)
>
> nb
haha no machinery involved what so ever!
--
mostyn harvey
DerbyDad03 wrote:
> Just something that will hopefully spark a friendly discussion...
>
> I was watching this episode of How It's Made this morning:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-18nLL-z9v4
>
> They open the segment with the words "use ... traditional furniture construction
> techniques." Let's call them TFCT.
>
> We can all agree that mortise and tenon joinery is a TFCT.
> We can all agree that steam bending is a TFCT.
>
> Let's consider "mortise and tenon" techniques. We've moved from chisels to
> foot operator mortisers to computer controlled mortisers as shown in the
> video. Is creating mortises and tenons with the assistance of a computer
> still considered a TFCT?
>
> Let's consider "steam bending" techniques. We've moved from home made jigs,
> manual clamps and multiple days of dry time to devices that use radio
> frequencies to dry thick pieces of wood to a precise moisture content in
> 1 hour.
>
> The question is: When have we left TFCT behind? Do we simply say "The
> fact that the chair was constructed with mortise and tenon joinery and
> steam bent parts means that TFCT were used" or do we say "Improvements, efficiencies and high tech devices have removed the use of TFCT from
> this chair build"?
>
Whatever you say, sellers will always say it was made "by hand". : )
DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 4:20:01 PM UTC-4, Bill wrote:
>> Dr. Deb wrote:
>>> To be honest, I can see nothing of traditional craftsmanship in the video. While they do use mortise and tenons, all that you really wind up with is a factory built chair.
>>>
>> I watched the video and heard the term "engineering".
> When?
I guess it was only my brain that heard it--when they said
"manufactured" (near the beginning).
Bill
On 07/16/2017 9:43 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> Just something that will hopefully spark a friendly discussion...
...
> The question is: When have we left TFCT behind? ...
"Traditional" comes from about the 18th century or somewhat earlier.
If they would have had access to the tools and power sources we have,
you think they wouldn't have jumped to them in a heartbeat?
In that case, we'd then have a wholly different definition of what it
means to be traditional.
--
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
If you didn't whittle it out of a tree with your bush knife, hand carve all
the pegs with the same knife, and hammer it together with the spine of your
bush knife then ITS NOT FREAKING TRADITIONALLY MADE.
LOL
*********
Its been pointed out to me that no traditional wood furniture would be
complete with out a woven leather seat. Of course before you can chew the
leather to soften it you must first dry and cure it with traditional
intestinal flora curing methods after chasing it down on foot and bashing it
in the skull with the femur of an antelope.
On 07/19/2017 12:56 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
...
> Its been pointed out to me that no traditional wood furniture would be
> complete with out a woven leather seat. Of course before you can chew
> the leather to soften it you must first dry and cure it with traditional
> intestinal flora curing methods after chasing it down on foot and
> bashing it in the skull with the femur of an antelope.
And it's getting that _first_ femur that's the real trick... :)
--
"Markem" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:10:35 -0500, dpb <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 07/19/2017 12:56 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
>...
>
>> Its been pointed out to me that no traditional wood furniture would be
>> complete with out a woven leather seat. Of course before you can chew
>> the leather to soften it you must first dry and cure it with traditional
>> intestinal flora curing methods after chasing it down on foot and
>> bashing it in the skull with the femur of an antelope.
>
>And it's getting that _first_ femur that's the real trick... :)
Well were are back to traditional wood working you need to make an
atlatl to get that first femur.
********
No sir. No new fangled tools allowed.
On 7/16/2017 4:37 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 2:20:09 PM UTC-4, Leon wrote:
>> On 7/16/2017 9:43 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> Just something that will hopefully spark a friendly discussion...
>>>
>>> I was watching this episode of How It's Made this morning:
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-18nLL-z9v4
>>>
>>> They open the segment with the words "use ... traditional furniture construction
>>> techniques." Let's call them TFCT.
>>>
>>> We can all agree that mortise and tenon joinery is a TFCT.
>>> We can all agree that steam bending is a TFCT.
>>>
>>> Let's consider "mortise and tenon" techniques. We've moved from chisels to
>>> foot operator mortisers to computer controlled mortisers as shown in the
>>> video. Is creating mortises and tenons with the assistance of a computer
>>> still considered a TFCT?
>>>
>>> Let's consider "steam bending" techniques. We've moved from home made jigs,
>>> manual clamps and multiple days of dry time to devices that use radio
>>> frequencies to dry thick pieces of wood to a precise moisture content in
>>> 1 hour.
>>>
>>> The question is: When have we left TFCT behind? Do we simply say "The
>>> fact that the chair was constructed with mortise and tenon joinery and
>>> steam bent parts means that TFCT were used" or do we say "Improvements, efficiencies and high tech devices have removed the use of TFCT from
>>> this chair build"?
>>>
>>>
>> 3
>>
>> I read TFCT as the construction style not the construction tools that
>> are used.
>
> So you don't include the making of the parts as "construction", just the
> assembly?
>
> OK, I'll give you that. Do you consider the use of the power stapler as TFCT?
>
;~)
If the set of plans instruct to build using traditional style of
construction, that to me is traditional. How you accomplish this is not
IMHO a consideration unless you indicate traditional tools.
And what is a traditional tool? That would be open for discussion
depending if you are considering tools that are/were used at a
particular point in time. 100 years ago, 200 years ago, 3 weeks ago. ;~)
On 7/16/2017 2:58 PM, Dr. Deb wrote:
> On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:43:48 AM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> Just something that will hopefully spark a friendly discussion...
>>
>> I was watching this episode of How It's Made this morning:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-18nLL-z9v4
>>
>> They open the segment with the words "use ... traditional furniture construction
>> techniques." Let's call them TFCT.
>>
>> We can all agree that mortise and tenon joinery is a TFCT.
>> We can all agree that steam bending is a TFCT.
>>
>> Let's consider "mortise and tenon" techniques. We've moved from chisels to
>> foot operator mortisers to computer controlled mortisers as shown in the
>> video. Is creating mortises and tenons with the assistance of a computer
>> still considered a TFCT?
>>
>> Let's consider "steam bending" techniques. We've moved from home made jigs,
>> manual clamps and multiple days of dry time to devices that use radio
>> frequencies to dry thick pieces of wood to a precise moisture content in
>> 1 hour.
>>
>> The question is: When have we left TFCT behind? Do we simply say "The
>> fact that the chair was constructed with mortise and tenon joinery and
>> steam bent parts means that TFCT were used" or do we say "Improvements, efficiencies and high tech devices have removed the use of TFCT from
>> this chair build"?
>
> To be honest, I can see nothing of traditional craftsmanship in the video. While they do use mortise and tenons, all that you really wind up with is a factory built chair.
>
> This is "real" TFCT (get ready for your dose of humility - at least it is for me)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hd4Juc4fYjw
>
Pretty good but he did use a bench top mortiser and a band saw. He used
hand planes but sometimes I sand by hand. ;~)