Everybody,
Was at my town's new Woodcraft's Grand Opening a couple of weeks ago,
and ran into the Jet rep who was there. I commented on their low price
on the Jet 18" Bandsaw. Woodcraft calls it the JWBS-18, but the
official number is 708750B. They want $999 for it, and I think that's
before a $100 rebate on a subsequent Jet purchase, although I'm not
completely sure. Anyway, he explained to me that the price is because
they're coming out with a new version (I think it's on their website as
the 710750/JWBS-18X) that has a 12" cutting capacity (improved over the
10 1/4" of the old one). It also has an extra quarter horespower to cut
the extra material better; reading the Amazon reviews, lack of power
seems to be a criticism of it. He wasn't sure of pricing but guessed
it'd be about $1250.
Amazon now has the old one at $999, as well. Just thought I'd let you
know - if you've been thinking about one of these, they've just gotten
cheaper, or are about to get better. So you might want to think about
either running out and getting one or waiting for the new model,
depending on whether saving $200 or getting 2" more cutting capacity
makes you more excited.
-BAT
I have the Jet 18". Hopefully they add more than 1/4hp to the new model,
it could use at LEAST 2 hp to resaw 10" stock. I wouldn't say it's
terribly underpowered as is, currently at 1 1/2 hp, but it's like having a
full size truck with a v6 instead of a v8. It gets the job done, just
slower. In fact, I've been toying with the idea of buying the Jet 2hp 1200
cfm DC and switching motors with the 1 1/2 hp band saw. My shop usually
looks more like a horse stall with all the dust, so a DC is next on the list
anyway. I'll follow up if this works. --dave
"Brett A. Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Everybody,
>
> Was at my town's new Woodcraft's Grand Opening a couple of weeks ago, and
> ran into the Jet rep who was there. I commented on their low price on the
> Jet 18" Bandsaw. Woodcraft calls it the JWBS-18, but the official number
> is 708750B. They want $999 for it, and I think that's before a $100
> rebate on a subsequent Jet purchase, although I'm not completely sure.
> Anyway, he explained to me that the price is because they're coming out
> with a new version (I think it's on their website as the 710750/JWBS-18X)
> that has a 12" cutting capacity (improved over the 10 1/4" of the old
> one). It also has an extra quarter horespower to cut the extra material
> better; reading the Amazon reviews, lack of power seems to be a criticism
> of it. He wasn't sure of pricing but guessed it'd be about $1250.
>
> Amazon now has the old one at $999, as well. Just thought I'd let you
> know - if you've been thinking about one of these, they've just gotten
> cheaper, or are about to get better. So you might want to think about
> either running out and getting one or waiting for the new model, depending
> on whether saving $200 or getting 2" more cutting capacity makes you more
> excited.
>
> -BAT
Try the 220 conversion I have experienced the the motor doesn't bog down as
easily. Also neoprene tires and add a second dust collection port in the
bottom of the lower wheel cabinet at about a 7:00 position as you view it. I
also use a 1/2" woodslicer blade and can get reasonable 8" resaw work out of
it.
<snip>> I hadn't realized these things were so underpowered
They are not as bad as it sounds. I too wrote as review on amazon and did
read about the motor conversion. Recently, i read "Band Saw Handbook" and
gave the saw an in depth tune up. Also added the "right" blade, which for
me is a 1/2" 3tpi hook tooth for resawing. Since then, I've been able to
resaw 7" to 8" thick cherry and QSWO fairly easily and accurately. In fact,
the saw now runs how i expected it to when i bought it, and overall I'm very
pleased with it, especially the bearing guides. If you are just cutting
regular hardwoods a few inches thick, the saw has ample power. My only
complaint is if the saw is built to resaw 10" thick material, it should be
powered to cut 10" material, not 8" thick material, hence the need for a 2
hp motor. --dave
"Brett A. Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dave Jackson wrote:
>> I have the Jet 18". Hopefully they add more than 1/4hp to the new
>> model, it could use at LEAST 2 hp to resaw 10" stock. I wouldn't say
>> it's terribly underpowered as is, currently at 1 1/2 hp, but it's like
>> having a full size truck with a v6 instead of a v8. It gets the job
>> done, just slower. In fact, I've been toying with the idea of buying the
>> Jet 2hp 1200 cfm DC and switching motors with the 1 1/2 hp band saw. My
>> shop usually looks more like a horse stall with all the dust, so a DC is
>> next on the list anyway. I'll follow up if this works. --dave
>
> On the Amazon reviews page, Eric Davidson says he upgraded his to a 2HP
> motor after he burned out the stock one:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A8KBVBV2XURXR/ref=cm_cr_auth/103-2939285-1403050?%5Fencoding=UTF8
>
> He encourages people to email him for details and posts his email address
> there and encourages people to email for details.
>
> I hadn't realized these things were so underpowered. I'd kinda-sorta had
> my eye on them, but hadn't done any real research because the purchase for
> me is quite a ways off. Just moved into my new place, and the shop is
> still too full of boxes to even use the tools I *already* have...
>
> -BAT
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:45:53 GMT, "Bob"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Brett A. Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>
>
>> I hadn't realized these things were so underpowered.
>
>Well, consider that they call it an 18" saw, yet a Powermatic 14" has a 1.5
>hp motor, and a Laguna 14" has a 2hp, etc. I'd say they over rated it rather
>than underpowered it. If they called it a super 14", it might not look so
>bad.
>
>Bob
>
the 18" is the wheel size, not the motor HP rating.
my 18" bandsaw has a 2HP motor... which seems about right.
Dave Jackson wrote:
> I have the Jet 18". Hopefully they add more than 1/4hp to the new model,
> it could use at LEAST 2 hp to resaw 10" stock. I wouldn't say it's
> terribly underpowered as is, currently at 1 1/2 hp, but it's like having a
> full size truck with a v6 instead of a v8. It gets the job done, just
> slower. In fact, I've been toying with the idea of buying the Jet 2hp 1200
> cfm DC and switching motors with the 1 1/2 hp band saw. My shop usually
> looks more like a horse stall with all the dust, so a DC is next on the list
> anyway. I'll follow up if this works. --dave
Uh.... that isn't dust in the bottom of the stall....
--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
[email protected]
"Brett A. Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Was at my town's new Woodcraft's Grand Opening a couple of weeks ago,
> and ran into the Jet rep who was there. I commented on their low price
> on the Jet 18" Bandsaw. Woodcraft calls it the JWBS-18, but the
> official number is 708750B. They want $999 for it,
The Jet 18 has never been the equal of any other 18" bandsaw and Jet has
recognized it. $999 is about right for what its value is. I'm glad to see
Jet upgrading it. It remains to be seen if it will be competitive with the
other established performers. I like Jet company and own several of their
tools, but their bandsaws have never impressed me.
Bob
Dave Jackson wrote:
> I have the Jet 18". Hopefully they add more than 1/4hp to the new model,
> it could use at LEAST 2 hp to resaw 10" stock. I wouldn't say it's
> terribly underpowered as is, currently at 1 1/2 hp, but it's like having a
> full size truck with a v6 instead of a v8. It gets the job done, just
> slower. In fact, I've been toying with the idea of buying the Jet 2hp 1200
> cfm DC and switching motors with the 1 1/2 hp band saw. My shop usually
> looks more like a horse stall with all the dust, so a DC is next on the list
> anyway. I'll follow up if this works. --dave
On the Amazon reviews page, Eric Davidson says he upgraded his to a 2HP
motor after he burned out the stock one:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A8KBVBV2XURXR/ref=cm_cr_auth/103-2939285-1403050?%5Fencoding=UTF8
He encourages people to email him for details and posts his email
address there and encourages people to email for details.
I hadn't realized these things were so underpowered. I'd kinda-sorta
had my eye on them, but hadn't done any real research because the
purchase for me is quite a ways off. Just moved into my new place, and
the shop is still too full of boxes to even use the tools I *already*
have...
-BAT
Knothead wrote:
> Try the 220 conversion I have experienced the the motor doesn't bog down as
> easily.
Does a 220 conversion really do this? I thought the only point of a 220
conversion was to lower the number of amps you needed at the tool (and
maybe make it run cooler). But I didn't think a 220 conversion would
make better cuts or bog down less. Am I mistaken on that? I've never
used a 220 tool, so I'm just leaning on my book learnin' here.
I'm planning on rewiring all my big tools to 220 (because I only have 40
amps for my new shop), but I wasn't expecting to get any performance
gains out of that. I'd love to be wrong!
-BAT
"Dave Jackson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> slower. In fact, I've been toying with the idea of buying the Jet 2hp
1200
> cfm DC and switching motors with the 1 1/2 hp band saw.
DON'T downgrade the motor on their DC 1200 dust collector. There is more
than just a motor change difference between their DC 1100 and DC 1200 dust
collector. The DC1200 has a large impeller, moves more air and requires
more horsepower. You would likely overheat a 1 1/2 motor trying to turn too
big an impeller, not to mention voiding the warranty. You might consider
just buying a larger motor for the Jet 18 bandsaw.
Bob
"Brett A. Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I hadn't realized these things were so underpowered.
Well, consider that they call it an 18" saw, yet a Powermatic 14" has a 1.5
hp motor, and a Laguna 14" has a 2hp, etc. I'd say they over rated it rather
than underpowered it. If they called it a super 14", it might not look so
bad.
Bob
<snip>Uh.... that isn't dust in the bottom of the stall....
Sure it is, It's the "apples" you have to look out for :) --dave
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dave Jackson wrote:
>> I have the Jet 18". Hopefully they add more than 1/4hp to the new
>> model,
>> it could use at LEAST 2 hp to resaw 10" stock. I wouldn't say it's
>> terribly underpowered as is, currently at 1 1/2 hp, but it's like having
>> a
>> full size truck with a v6 instead of a v8. It gets the job done, just
>> slower. In fact, I've been toying with the idea of buying the Jet 2hp
>> 1200
>> cfm DC and switching motors with the 1 1/2 hp band saw. My shop usually
>> looks more like a horse stall with all the dust, so a DC is next on the
>> list
>> anyway. I'll follow up if this works. --dave
>
>
> Uh.... that isn't dust in the bottom of the stall....
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mortimer Schnerd, RN
>
> [email protected]
>
>
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:19:38 -0800, "Brett A. Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Knothead wrote:
>> Try the 220 conversion I have experienced the the motor doesn't bog down as
>> easily.
>
>Does a 220 conversion really do this? I thought the only point of a 220
>conversion was to lower the number of amps you needed at the tool (and
>maybe make it run cooler). But I didn't think a 220 conversion would
>make better cuts or bog down less. Am I mistaken on that? I've never
>used a 220 tool, so I'm just leaning on my book learnin' here.
>
>I'm planning on rewiring all my big tools to 220 (because I only have 40
>amps for my new shop), but I wasn't expecting to get any performance
>gains out of that. I'd love to be wrong!
>
>-BAT
Any performance gains would be due to a lower power loss in the feed lines.
Moving to 220v cuts the amperage draw in half. Since the power loss is a
function of the square of the amperage ( P = R * I^2 ) your line loss at 220v
will be only 1/4 as much as with 110v. (Voltage drop is 1/2 as much with 220 as
with 110, Power loss is 1/4 as much.)
Whether you see a noticeable gain at the tool or not will depend on the total
amperage draw and the resistance of the line feeding your shop. You will see the
greater effect the closer you are to the amperage limit (ampacity) for the gauge
of the current feeder line.
Tom Veatch
Wichita, KS USA