VH

Vince Heuring

15/10/2006 9:46 AM

Sears CompuCarve - Amazing


Found in the new Craftsman catalog.

I was standing over the garbage can idly thumbing through the Craftsman
catalog that came in the mail, prior to throwing it in the can when I
came across this:

Craftsman CompuCarve Compact Woodworking Machine, Computer-Controlled

Compact, computer-controlled, 3-dimensional woodworking machine with an
easy-to-use interface. It allows a novice to make a complete project
without a shop full of tools.The unique configuration allows it to
perform many other woodworking functions, including ripping, cross
cutting, mitering, contouring, jointing and routing. The CompuCarve can
work in most soft materials, including wood, plastics (polycarbonate or
cast acrylic) and certain types of high density foam. Set includes
CompuCarve machine, (1) 1/16 in. carbide carving bit, (1) 1/8 in.
carbide cutting bit, CarveWright Memory Card, starter software package,
(2) 1/4 in. bit adaptors, vacuum bag adaptor, bit removal tool, hex
wrench, owner's manual and Quick Start Guide.
Built-in computer walks you through project setup
QuickRout technology makes changing bits quick and easy
Memory card - no need to keep a computer in the shop
CarveWright design software is powerful yet easy to use - even novices
can create complex designs in minutes
Expandable 3-D design library
Patented rising-head and feed-through configuration handles work pieces
up to 14-1/2 in. W, 5 in. H and almost any length
Allows you to achieve professional results regardless of space, time,
budget or skill
Requires a PC running Windows 2000 or XP with 128 MB RAM (256 MB or
greater recommended), 75 MB of hard drive space and an accelerated
graphics card with OpenGL support


It looks like they started with a 14" planar body and added the
computer control and the bit holder.

Price: $1,899.99, Out of Stock.

No use posting the link, it had a cookie with it. The Sears part number
is 00921754000.

Two things were mind-boggling: 1) the price: <$2000 for a
computer-controlled woodworking machine, and 2) it came from Sears.

Guys, we're entering a new phase in woodworking.

And, of course I have no affiliation with Sears aside from the
screwdriver set I bought 15 years ago.

--
Vince Heuring To email, remove the Vince.


This topic has 33 replies

Rd

"Robatoy"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

15/10/2006 10:00 PM


Morris Dovey wrote:

[snip]
>
> One of the things that's been fun for me is that my DIY machine's body
> is baltic birch plywood. :-)

Mosquito bombers were plywood. Fine pieces of equipment indeed.
Spruce...like Martin guitars?
I will never apologize for the proper application of plywood, as I know
you haven't.
Used in a proper application, plywood is good stuff. Real good stuff.

http://www.hermanmiller.com/CDA/SSA/Product/0,,a10-c440-p47,00.html

AD

"Andy Dingley "

in reply to "Robatoy" on 15/10/2006 10:00 PM

16/10/2006 9:10 AM

J T wrote:

> Sun, Oct 15, 2006, 10:00pm (EDT-3) [email protected] (Robatoy) doth
> writeth:
> Mosquito bombers were plywood. <snip>
>
> And I've got a book that shows how it was done. Hehehe

> PT Boats where alsol made from plywood,

It's worth distinguishing Mosquitoes from PT boats though. Boats were
"made from plywood", i.e. there was a shed where plywood went in and
boats came out. Mosquitoes weren't "made from it" in the same way -
individual sheets of single veneers went in and they only became
multi-lam plywood whilst in the curved Mosquito-shaped mould. This
allowed much better control of tight curves and also fewer joins.

Incidentally, the first UK jet aircraft were plywood too. Those early
twin-boom designs like the Vampire and Venom were a Mosquito-stye
plywood egg containing the pilot and engine, in front of two skinny
aluminium tube booms to the tailplane.

AD

"Andy Dingley "

in reply to "Robatoy" on 15/10/2006 10:00 PM

16/10/2006 5:37 PM


J. Clarke wrote:

> The Gotha 226 and Heinkel 162 jets that the Germans didn't quite have done
> in time to see combat was also plywood.

Not sure about the Gotha, but the He 162 was built from ready-laminated
plywood sheets for the wings and an aluminium monocoque fuselage. The
one German aircraft that followed the Mosquito construction technique
was the near-copy Ta154 Moskito. This was famously a failure after the
Tego-film glue plant was bombed and there was no viable alternative for
the moulded bonding process.

JJ

in reply to "Robatoy" on 15/10/2006 10:00 PM

16/10/2006 9:42 AM

Sun, Oct 15, 2006, 10:00pm (EDT-3) [email protected] (Robatoy) doth
writeth:
Mosquito bombers were plywood. <snip>

And I've got a book that shows how it was done. Hehehe
Unfortunately I don't have much use for a bomber, being as how I don't
care for flying anymore.

PT Boats where alsol made from plywood, along with various other
military craft. And if you want to see some high quality boats with
plywood used in them, check out WoodenBoat sometime.

I won't say a lot of high-end furniture is made from plywood. Some
is certainly, but plywood often is talso he material of choice of some
of the "artistes" that "make furniture" - and the stuff they make I
don't consider "fine", and sometimes not even "furniture". There is
some furniture made from plywood that I do think looks very good, sadly
I thik most of it is vastly overriced too..

I'm pretty fascinated with plywood, it's my wood of choice for my
most of my jigs, all my patterns, and a sizeable percentage of my
projects, in whole or part.



JOAT
It's not hard, if you get your mind right.
- Granny Weatherwax

JC

"J. Clarke"

in reply to "Robatoy" on 15/10/2006 10:00 PM

16/10/2006 5:21 PM


<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>J T wrote:
>
>> Sun, Oct 15, 2006, 10:00pm (EDT-3) [email protected] (Robatoy) doth
>> writeth:
>> Mosquito bombers were plywood. <snip>
>>
>> And I've got a book that shows how it was done. Hehehe
>
>> PT Boats where alsol made from plywood,
>
> It's worth distinguishing Mosquitoes from PT boats though. Boats were
> "made from plywood", i.e. there was a shed where plywood went in and
> boats came out. Mosquitoes weren't "made from it" in the same way -
> individual sheets of single veneers went in and they only became
> multi-lam plywood whilst in the curved Mosquito-shaped mould. This
> allowed much better control of tight curves and also fewer joins.
>
> Incidentally, the first UK jet aircraft were plywood too. Those early
> twin-boom designs like the Vampire and Venom were a Mosquito-stye
> plywood egg containing the pilot and engine, in front of two skinny
> aluminium tube booms to the tailplane.

The Gotha 226 and Heinkel 162 jets that the Germans didn't quite have done
in time to see combat was also plywood.

As to plywood fine furniture, the Eames lounge chair is a plywood classic.

bb

"brianlanning"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

16/10/2006 3:21 PM

Morris Dovey wrote:
> Not really. If I read the carveright.com FAQ correctly, cutter
> positioning is accurate in 0.006" increments. For quality joinery, I
> found the ShopBot's 0.001" accuracy inadequate - and built my own
> machine from scratch to shrink the resolution to 0.00023". It's a "get
> what you pay for" situation. Anyone who hasn't already can see my ugly
> (but accurate!) machine by following the link below.

0.006 is better than 1/128. I wouldn't be using this for joinery
anyway. Even though it says you can use it for that. I'm mainly
interested in artistic carving. I especially like the carve-through
stuff. My only complaint is that the maximum depth of cut is only 1".
I can't complain though. I guess you could make a 2" thick
carve-through relief carving by running it through one side, then
flipping it over and running the other side through. Lining things up
might be tough.

brian

bb

"brianlanning"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

16/10/2006 3:51 PM

Morris Dovey wrote:
> Software is glitzy but weak. I'd expect any CNC machine to be able to
> handle the industry-standard g-code (or equivalent) part programs.
> This is probably the Carveright's greatest weakness because it
> prevents use of generally available CAD/CAM packages.

The faq says that they'll be upgrading the software to handle g-code
(import and export) later. If they actually do that then I'm ok with
it. My biggest concern is that I don't want to have to learn something
like autocad in order to use this. But at the same time, it would be
nice to have other sources for data. I'm a software developer so I'm
no stranger to complicated software. I just don't want to spend all my
free time fighting with the software. To use image file software as an
analogy, it clearly needs to be better than paint, but I don't want to
have to learn photoshop.

brian

bb

"bf"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

17/10/2006 5:56 AM


Morris Dovey wrote:
> Smaug Ichorfang (in [email protected]) said:
>
> | (Morris comments about the accuracy of his DIY CNC router vs
> | ShopBot)
> |
> | So you've improved from xx1 to xx023. How much did yours cost?
>
> That's a difficult question to answer completely. The finished JBot
> materials cost was close to US$1K - but I made at least three of every
> part (not included in the total) and I didn't keep track of my time.

Interesting. Did you end up needing to use some of the extra parts? Or
did things generally fit well.


>
> The interesting side effect is, of course, that when it was all done I
> had all of the design and debugged part programs to create knock-offs.

Do you plan to do that? Build and sell some knockoffs?

bb

"brianlanning"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

18/10/2006 9:39 AM

steamer wrote:
> --Speaking of thickness I get the impression, from the video, that
> although the machine might have a capacity of several inches of height, the
> routing head looks like it couldn't do and great variation in depth; i.e.
> how deep a hole could you plunge in a part before the chuck got in the way
> of the surrounding wood? If there's clearance then the thing would be damn
> handy for patternmaking.

The faq on the site says 1 inch max. I'd want more than that, but
under the circumstances, it's fine. On the website, they show some
examples of pattern making also. And in the forums, someone uploaded a
file that cuts out knobs for jigs. Cool stuff.

If you wanted more than one inch, you could do the relief cut in two
passes, the first being a through cut. Then you'd get 2 inches of
depth. You'd have to nail the design to make things line up though.

brian

Pn

Prometheus

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

17/10/2006 3:57 AM

On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:58:02 -0500, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>steamer (in [email protected]) said:
>
>| Morris Dovey <[email protected]> wrote:
>|| Not really. If I read the carveright.com FAQ correctly, cutter
>|| positioning is accurate in 0.006" increments. For quality joinery,
>|| I found the ShopBot's 0.001" accuracy inadequate - and built my own
>| SNIP
>| --Is this sloppy tolerance a function of software or funky hardware;
>| i.e. might one tighten up the cheap machine by swapping in some
>| ballscrews?
>
>Probably not software and probably not sloppy/funky hardware - much
>more likely a choice involving costs of the linear motion components:
>steppers, driving electronics, lead screws, etc.
>
>Software is glitzy but weak. I'd expect any CNC machine to be able to
>handle the industry-standard g-code (or equivalent) part programs.
>This is probably the Carveright's greatest weakness because it
>prevents use of generally available CAD/CAM packages.

Hey Morris,

You've made the case before about your particular need for
extrordinary tolerances in your product, but .006" is pretty
outstanding for a 3d set-and-forget carving machine under $2k. While
I'm sure they could have made it measure tenths, there's not much need
for that when it comes to a guy making a set of cabriole legs or some
rope molding. :)

I'd rather see it at the price and tolerance rating its at than see it
at the quality level of a Mazak, but far more than ten years' income
for me! For a couple of grand, I might get one at some point in the
future (or perhaps not- it seems it might take a bit of the fun out of
carving)

Would be nice if it did handle standard G-codes, on that I definately
agree. Doesn't make much sense for them not to have done that- just
more work for them to make a slightly inferior product.

JJ

in reply to Prometheus on 17/10/2006 3:57 AM

17/10/2006 3:49 PM

Tue, Oct 17, 2006, 3:57am (EDT-1) [email protected] (Prometheus)
doth posteth:
<snip> there's not much need for that when it comes to a guy making a
set of cabriole legs or some rope molding. :) <snip>

True. But there's a rumor that he's thinking about producing pukey
ducks, so he'd need it then.



JOAT
It's not hard, if you get your mind right.
- Granny Weatherwax

Pn

Prometheus

in reply to Prometheus on 17/10/2006 3:57 AM

18/10/2006 3:32 AM

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:49:13 -0400, [email protected] (J T)
wrote:

>Tue, Oct 17, 2006, 3:57am (EDT-1) [email protected] (Prometheus)
>doth posteth:
><snip> there's not much need for that when it comes to a guy making a
>set of cabriole legs or some rope molding. :) <snip>
>
> True. But there's a rumor that he's thinking about producing pukey
>ducks, so he'd need it then.

Well, hell- that changes things a bit. I know I try to keep my pukey
ducks to within .05 microns of the plan. Didn't think of that one!

JJ

in reply to Prometheus on 18/10/2006 3:32 AM

19/10/2006 10:22 AM

Wed, Oct 18, 2006, 3:32am (EDT-1) [email protected] (Prometheus)
doth sayeth:
Well, hell- that changes things a bit. I know I try to keep my pukey
ducks to within .05 microns of the plan. Didn't think of that one!

Exactly. You can mess around and do sloppy work on furniture and
get away with it, but pukey ducks call for quality work.



JOAT
It's not hard, if you get your mind right.
- Granny Weatherwax

MD

"Morris Dovey"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

15/10/2006 5:48 PM

Vince Heuring (in 151020060946554457%[email protected])
said:

| Found in the new Craftsman catalog.

<snip>

| Guys, we're entering a new phase in woodworking.

Not really. If I read the carveright.com FAQ correctly, cutter
positioning is accurate in 0.006" increments. For quality joinery, I
found the ShopBot's 0.001" accuracy inadequate - and built my own
machine from scratch to shrink the resolution to 0.00023". It's a "get
what you pay for" situation. Anyone who hasn't already can see my ugly
(but accurate!) machine by following the link below.

One of the things that's been fun for me is that my DIY machine's body
is baltic birch plywood. :-)

--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/JBot.html

MD

"Morris Dovey"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

16/10/2006 7:42 AM

Smaug Ichorfang (in [email protected]) said:

| (Morris comments about the accuracy of his DIY CNC router vs
| ShopBot)
|
| So you've improved from xx1 to xx023. How much did yours cost?

That's a difficult question to answer completely. The finished JBot
materials cost was close to US$1K - but I made at least three of every
part (not included in the total) and I didn't keep track of my time.

It'd have been difficult (but possible) for me to build the JBot
without the ShopBot; but having that to make the baltic birch parts
and being able to use it as a CNC milling machine for aluminum made
things much easier. Without the ShopBot, I would have had to have all
of the metal parts made for me.

Also not included in that total was the time spent "noodling",
producing the CAD drawings (an absolute necessity for this project!),
and hand-coding - and debugging - the part programs that controlled
the ShopBot.

The interesting side effect is, of course, that when it was all done I
had all of the design and debugged part programs to create knock-offs.

--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto

md

mac davis

in reply to "Morris Dovey" on 16/10/2006 7:42 AM

16/10/2006 9:48 AM

On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:54:03 -0400, [email protected] (J T) wrote:

>Mon, Oct 16, 2006, 7:42am (EDT-1) [email protected] (Morris Dovey) doth
>sayeth:
><snip> I didn't keep track of my time. <snip>
>
> Good thing for you that you were working for free then. 'Cause if
>you'd charged yourself by the hour you might have padded your time, and
>then you might not have been able to afford to finish the machine after
>you'd paid yourself. I always charge myself low in cases like that, so
>I know I can afford to finish. Charity begins at home.
>
>
Just run a tab, bro... lol

Mac

https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis
https://home.comcast.net/~mac.davis/wood_stuff.htm

JJ

in reply to mac davis on 16/10/2006 9:48 AM

16/10/2006 5:45 PM

Mon, Oct 16, 2006, 9:48am (EDT-3) [email protected] (mac=A0davis) doth
adviseth:
Just run a tab, bro... lol

No way. I'd probably not be able to pay myself, which means I'd
have to sue myself to get my pay, which means I'd probably have to
declare bankrupcy. It's just not worth running a tab.



JOAT
It's not hard, if you get your mind right.
- Granny Weatherwax

JJ

in reply to "Morris Dovey" on 16/10/2006 7:42 AM

16/10/2006 9:54 AM

Mon, Oct 16, 2006, 7:42am (EDT-1) [email protected] (Morris=A0Dovey) doth
sayeth:
<snip> I didn't keep track of my time. <snip>

Good thing for you that you were working for free then. 'Cause if
you'd charged yourself by the hour you might have padded your time, and
then you might not have been able to afford to finish the machine after
you'd paid yourself. I always charge myself low in cases like that, so
I know I can afford to finish. Charity begins at home.



JOAT
It's not hard, if you get your mind right.
- Granny Weatherwax

ss

steamer

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

16/10/2006 4:48 PM

Morris Dovey <[email protected]> wrote:
>Not really. If I read the carveright.com FAQ correctly, cutter
>positioning is accurate in 0.006" increments. For quality joinery, I
>found the ShopBot's 0.001" accuracy inadequate - and built my own
SNIP
--Is this sloppy tolerance a function of software or funky hardware;
i.e. might one tighten up the cheap machine by swapping in some ballscrews?


--
"Steamboat Ed" Haas : Proud to be the
Hacking the Trailing Edge! : family crackpot!
www.nmpproducts.com
---Decks a-wash in a sea of words---

MD

"Morris Dovey"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

16/10/2006 4:58 PM

steamer (in [email protected]) said:

| Morris Dovey <[email protected]> wrote:
|| Not really. If I read the carveright.com FAQ correctly, cutter
|| positioning is accurate in 0.006" increments. For quality joinery,
|| I found the ShopBot's 0.001" accuracy inadequate - and built my own
| SNIP
| --Is this sloppy tolerance a function of software or funky hardware;
| i.e. might one tighten up the cheap machine by swapping in some
| ballscrews?

Probably not software and probably not sloppy/funky hardware - much
more likely a choice involving costs of the linear motion components:
steppers, driving electronics, lead screws, etc.

Software is glitzy but weak. I'd expect any CNC machine to be able to
handle the industry-standard g-code (or equivalent) part programs.
This is probably the Carveright's greatest weakness because it
prevents use of generally available CAD/CAM packages.

--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto

MD

"Morris Dovey"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

16/10/2006 8:04 PM

brianlanning (in [email protected])
said:

| Morris Dovey wrote:
|| Software is glitzy but weak. I'd expect any CNC machine to be able
|| to handle the industry-standard g-code (or equivalent) part
|| programs. This is probably the Carveright's greatest weakness
|| because it prevents use of generally available CAD/CAM packages.
|
| The faq says that they'll be upgrading the software to handle g-code
| (import and export) later. If they actually do that then I'm ok
| with it. My biggest concern is that I don't want to have to learn
| something like autocad in order to use this. But at the same time,
| it would be nice to have other sources for data. I'm a software
| developer so I'm no stranger to complicated software. I just don't
| want to spend all my free time fighting with the software. To use
| image file software as an analogy, it clearly needs to be better
| than paint, but I don't want to have to learn photoshop.

I hear you; but my experience has been that as you develop a sense of
what's possible, you tend more and more toward wanting/buying/writing
the tools that realize the possibilities.

I just posted some (lousy) photos to the abpw biscuit joinery thread
that I think would be difficult/impossible to do without a programming
capability of some kind.

The program used, BTW, takes board width and thickness, tennon width,
height, and thickness, and tenon angle as parameters. It does all the
trig and cuts the resultant tenon joint. It'll work with thin stock as
shown - and equally well with two-by lumber. There's just no way to do
that kind of thing from a graphic.

--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto

MD

"Morris Dovey"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

17/10/2006 7:31 AM

Troy (in [email protected]) said:

| Morris, they did say the G-Code software was on its way.

Yup. They've been saying so for long enough that I've become a bit
skeptical that it'll happen in the (product) lifetime for current
purchasers.

There's a CNC control program with a g-code interpreter available for
download on the web. Registered users ($60) can download full source.
If these guys don't already know how to implement what they've been
promising, they could have looked to see how someone else did it and
followed in their footsteps.

When I purchased my ShopBot, they said (right in one of the
downloadable manuals) that they'd make their source code available to
purchasers - which was a major component of my decision to purchase my
'Bot. I have a really strong preference to run the machine under Linux
(I've never been comfortable entrusting Microsoft with control of a
robot capable of inflicting serious injury). After a couple of years,
I've given up hope of seeing code to port.

I like for parts that I make to fit together without needing to do a
lot of screwing around with hand work to correct for machine
inaccuracies. My experience has been that +/-0.001 is marginal
(perhaps slightly submarginal) for achieving a high quality result.
Too often the choice is between needing to hammer the parts together
or spackle over the joint to hide the gaps.

Having said all that, I should admit that while this product is
actually a pretty nifty 2.5D graphics rendering device - which is how
they present it on their web site. It's just not terrific as a 3D CNC
device for woodworkers.

--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto

MD

"Morris Dovey"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

17/10/2006 8:14 AM

bf (in [email protected]) said:

| Morris Dovey wrote:
|| Smaug Ichorfang (in [email protected])
|| said:
||
||| (Morris comments about the accuracy of his DIY CNC router vs
||| ShopBot)
|||
||| So you've improved from xx1 to xx023. How much did yours cost?
||
|| That's a difficult question to answer completely. The finished JBot
|| materials cost was close to US$1K - but I made at least three of
|| every part (not included in the total) and I didn't keep track of
|| my time.
|
| Interesting. Did you end up needing to use some of the extra parts?
| Or did things generally fit well.

The re-made parts were to correct for design or part programming goofs
in the replaced parts. The final parts fit exceedingly well - but the
replaced parts are all firewood.

|| The interesting side effect is, of course, that when it was all
|| done I had all of the design and debugged part programs to create
|| knock-offs.
|
| Do you plan to do that? Build and sell some knockoffs?

If someone wanted to buy one, then I'd be happy to build more. If they
come out of my shop, I probably shouldn't call 'em knock-offs. :-)

FWIW, it's a really good learning exercise to DIY...

--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto

ss

steamer

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

18/10/2006 2:30 AM

Morris Dovey <[email protected]> wrote:
>The program used, BTW, takes board width and thickness, tennon width,
>height, and thickness, and tenon angle as parameters. It does all the
>trig and cuts the resultant tenon joint. It'll work with thin stock as
>shown - and equally well with two-by lumber. There's just no way to do
>that kind of thing from a graphic.
(SNIP)
--Speaking of thickness I get the impression, from the video, that
although the machine might have a capacity of several inches of height, the
routing head looks like it couldn't do and great variation in depth; i.e.
how deep a hole could you plunge in a part before the chuck got in the way
of the surrounding wood? If there's clearance then the thing would be damn
handy for patternmaking.


--
"Steamboat Ed" Haas : Proud to be the
Hacking the Trailing Edge! : family crackpot!
www.nmpproducts.com
---Decks a-wash in a sea of words---

TO

"Tall Oak"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

15/10/2006 8:06 PM


It appears to be a CarveWright

http://www.carveright.com/



"Vince Heuring" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:151020060946554457%[email protected]...
>
> Found in the new Craftsman catalog.
>
> I was standing over the garbage can idly thumbing through the Craftsman
> catalog that came in the mail, prior to throwing it in the can when I
> came across this:
>
> Craftsman CompuCarve Compact Woodworking Machine, Computer-Controlled
>
> Compact, computer-controlled, 3-dimensional woodworking machine with an
> easy-to-use interface. It allows a novice to make a complete project
> without a shop full of tools.The unique configuration allows it to
> perform many other woodworking functions, including ripping, cross
> cutting, mitering, contouring, jointing and routing. The CompuCarve can
> work in most soft materials, including wood, plastics (polycarbonate or
> cast acrylic) and certain types of high density foam. Set includes
> CompuCarve machine, (1) 1/16 in. carbide carving bit, (1) 1/8 in.
> carbide cutting bit, CarveWright Memory Card, starter software package,
> (2) 1/4 in. bit adaptors, vacuum bag adaptor, bit removal tool, hex
> wrench, owner's manual and Quick Start Guide.
> Built-in computer walks you through project setup
> QuickRout technology makes changing bits quick and easy
> Memory card - no need to keep a computer in the shop
> CarveWright design software is powerful yet easy to use - even novices
> can create complex designs in minutes
> Expandable 3-D design library
> Patented rising-head and feed-through configuration handles work pieces
> up to 14-1/2 in. W, 5 in. H and almost any length
> Allows you to achieve professional results regardless of space, time,
> budget or skill
> Requires a PC running Windows 2000 or XP with 128 MB RAM (256 MB or
> greater recommended), 75 MB of hard drive space and an accelerated
> graphics card with OpenGL support
>
>
> It looks like they started with a 14" planar body and added the
> computer control and the bit holder.
>
> Price: $1,899.99, Out of Stock.
>
> No use posting the link, it had a cookie with it. The Sears part number
> is 00921754000.
>
> Two things were mind-boggling: 1) the price: <$2000 for a
> computer-controlled woodworking machine, and 2) it came from Sears.
>
> Guys, we're entering a new phase in woodworking.
>
> And, of course I have no affiliation with Sears aside from the
> screwdriver set I bought 15 years ago.
>
> --
> Vince Heuring To email, remove the Vince.

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

15/10/2006 4:21 PM

"Troy" wrote in message
> That could be why it uses ... "
>
> CarveWright Memory Card,

Damn ... I thought there was finally a crockpot for the shop.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/01/06

TO

"Tall Oak"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

16/10/2006 4:44 PM

That was a clue but don't jump to quick though. Craftsman could have had
this manufactured to a proprietary "Craftsman" spec. I looked at the
CarveWright before and thought it was funny that Craftsman would stick their
name on it, since nowadays they do sell other brands.




"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Troy" wrote in message
>> That could be why it uses ... "
>>
>> CarveWright Memory Card,
>
> Damn ... I thought there was finally a crockpot for the shop.
>
> --
> www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 10/01/06
>
>

SI

Smaug Ichorfang

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

16/10/2006 6:51 AM

(Morris comments about the accuracy of his DIY CNC router vs ShopBot)

So you've improved from xx1 to xx023. How much did yours cost?

TT

"Tim"

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

15/10/2006 5:59 PM


"Vince Heuring" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:151020060946554457%[email protected]...
>
> Found in the new Craftsman catalog.
>
> I was standing over the garbage can idly thumbing through the Craftsman
> catalog that came in the mail, prior to throwing it in the can when I
> came across this:
>
> Craftsman CompuCarve Compact Woodworking Machine, Computer-Controlled
>
> Compact, computer-controlled, 3-dimensional woodworking machine with an
> easy-to-use interface. It allows a novice to make a complete project
> without a shop full of tools.The unique configuration allows it to
> perform many other woodworking functions, including ripping, cross
> cutting, mitering, contouring, jointing and routing. The CompuCarve can
> work in most soft materials, including wood, plastics (polycarbonate or
> cast acrylic) and certain types of high density foam. Set includes
> CompuCarve machine, (1) 1/16 in. carbide carving bit, (1) 1/8 in.
> carbide cutting bit, CarveWright Memory Card, starter software package,
> (2) 1/4 in. bit adaptors, vacuum bag adaptor, bit removal tool, hex
> wrench, owner's manual and Quick Start Guide.
> Built-in computer walks you through project setup
> QuickRout technology makes changing bits quick and easy
> Memory card - no need to keep a computer in the shop
> CarveWright design software is powerful yet easy to use - even novices
> can create complex designs in minutes
> Expandable 3-D design library
> Patented rising-head and feed-through configuration handles work pieces
> up to 14-1/2 in. W, 5 in. H and almost any length
> Allows you to achieve professional results regardless of space, time,
> budget or skill
> Requires a PC running Windows 2000 or XP with 128 MB RAM (256 MB or
> greater recommended), 75 MB of hard drive space and an accelerated
> graphics card with OpenGL support
>
>
> It looks like they started with a 14" planar body and added the
> computer control and the bit holder.
>
> Price: $1,899.99, Out of Stock.
>
> No use posting the link, it had a cookie with it. The Sears part number
> is 00921754000.
>
> Two things were mind-boggling: 1) the price: <$2000 for a
> computer-controlled woodworking machine, and 2) it came from Sears.
>
> Guys, we're entering a new phase in woodworking.
>
I would sure like to see it work. Must be really slow, but if it is set and
forget...

Th

Troy

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

15/10/2006 12:46 PM

WOW, at that price no wonder its out of stock!
Troy

Vince Heuring wrote:
> Found in the new Craftsman catalog.
>
> I was standing over the garbage can idly thumbing through the Craftsman
> catalog that came in the mail, prior to throwing it in the can when I
> came across this:
>
> Craftsman CompuCarve Compact Woodworking Machine, Computer-Controlled
>
> Compact, computer-controlled, 3-dimensional woodworking machine with an
> easy-to-use interface. It allows a novice to make a complete project
> without a shop full of tools.The unique configuration allows it to
> perform many other woodworking functions, including ripping, cross
> cutting, mitering, contouring, jointing and routing. The CompuCarve can
> work in most soft materials, including wood, plastics (polycarbonate or
> cast acrylic) and certain types of high density foam. Set includes
> CompuCarve machine, (1) 1/16 in. carbide carving bit, (1) 1/8 in.
> carbide cutting bit, CarveWright Memory Card, starter software package,
> (2) 1/4 in. bit adaptors, vacuum bag adaptor, bit removal tool, hex
> wrench, owner's manual and Quick Start Guide.
> Built-in computer walks you through project setup
> QuickRout technology makes changing bits quick and easy
> Memory card - no need to keep a computer in the shop
> CarveWright design software is powerful yet easy to use - even novices
> can create complex designs in minutes
> Expandable 3-D design library
> Patented rising-head and feed-through configuration handles work pieces
> up to 14-1/2 in. W, 5 in. H and almost any length
> Allows you to achieve professional results regardless of space, time,
> budget or skill
> Requires a PC running Windows 2000 or XP with 128 MB RAM (256 MB or
> greater recommended), 75 MB of hard drive space and an accelerated
> graphics card with OpenGL support
>
>
> It looks like they started with a 14" planar body and added the
> computer control and the bit holder.
>
> Price: $1,899.99, Out of Stock.
>
> No use posting the link, it had a cookie with it. The Sears part number
> is 00921754000.
>
> Two things were mind-boggling: 1) the price: <$2000 for a
> computer-controlled woodworking machine, and 2) it came from Sears.
>
> Guys, we're entering a new phase in woodworking.
>
> And, of course I have no affiliation with Sears aside from the
> screwdriver set I bought 15 years ago.
>
>

Th

Troy

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

15/10/2006 3:57 PM

That could be why it uses ... "

CarveWright Memory Card,
"

:P


Tall Oak wrote:
> It appears to be a CarveWright
>
> http://www.carveright.com/
>
>
>
> "Vince Heuring" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:151020060946554457%[email protected]...
>
>> Found in the new Craftsman catalog.
>>
>> I was standing over the garbage can idly thumbing through the Craftsman
>> catalog that came in the mail, prior to throwing it in the can when I
>> came across this:
>>
>> Craftsman CompuCarve Compact Woodworking Machine, Computer-Controlled
>>
>> Compact, computer-controlled, 3-dimensional woodworking machine with an
>> easy-to-use interface. It allows a novice to make a complete project
>> without a shop full of tools.The unique configuration allows it to
>> perform many other woodworking functions, including ripping, cross
>> cutting, mitering, contouring, jointing and routing. The CompuCarve can
>> work in most soft materials, including wood, plastics (polycarbonate or
>> cast acrylic) and certain types of high density foam. Set includes
>> CompuCarve machine, (1) 1/16 in. carbide carving bit, (1) 1/8 in.
>> carbide cutting bit, CarveWright Memory Card, starter software package,
>> (2) 1/4 in. bit adaptors, vacuum bag adaptor, bit removal tool, hex
>> wrench, owner's manual and Quick Start Guide.
>> Built-in computer walks you through project setup
>> QuickRout technology makes changing bits quick and easy
>> Memory card - no need to keep a computer in the shop
>> CarveWright design software is powerful yet easy to use - even novices
>> can create complex designs in minutes
>> Expandable 3-D design library
>> Patented rising-head and feed-through configuration handles work pieces
>> up to 14-1/2 in. W, 5 in. H and almost any length
>> Allows you to achieve professional results regardless of space, time,
>> budget or skill
>> Requires a PC running Windows 2000 or XP with 128 MB RAM (256 MB or
>> greater recommended), 75 MB of hard drive space and an accelerated
>> graphics card with OpenGL support
>>
>>
>> It looks like they started with a 14" planar body and added the
>> computer control and the bit holder.
>>
>> Price: $1,899.99, Out of Stock.
>>
>> No use posting the link, it had a cookie with it. The Sears part number
>> is 00921754000.
>>
>> Two things were mind-boggling: 1) the price: <$2000 for a
>> computer-controlled woodworking machine, and 2) it came from Sears.
>>
>> Guys, we're entering a new phase in woodworking.
>>
>> And, of course I have no affiliation with Sears aside from the
>> screwdriver set I bought 15 years ago.
>>
>> --
>> Vince Heuring To email, remove the Vince.
>>
>
>
>

Th

Troy

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

17/10/2006 4:37 AM

"Theoritically" lining it up should be a now brainer, as its supposed to
"know" the board size and positioning, so it would just be mirroring the
other side per se'
You should be able to get it to within .012 i would think.

Troy

brianlanning wrote:
> Morris Dovey wrote:
>
>
> 0.006 is better than 1/128. I wouldn't be using this for joinery
> anyway. Even though it says you can use it for that. I'm mainly
> interested in artistic carving. I especially like the carve-through
> stuff. My only complaint is that the maximum depth of cut is only 1".
> I can't complain though. I guess you could make a 2" thick
> carve-through relief carving by running it through one side, then
> flipping it over and running the other side through. Lining things up
> might be tough.
>
> brian
>
>

Th

Troy

in reply to Vince Heuring on 15/10/2006 9:46 AM

17/10/2006 4:38 AM

Morris, they did say the G-Code software was on its way.

Troy

Morris Dovey wrote:
> steamer (in [email protected]) said:
>
> | Morris Dovey <[email protected]> wrote:
> || Not really. If I read the carveright.com FAQ correctly, cutter
> || positioning is accurate in 0.006" increments. For quality joinery,
> || I found the ShopBot's 0.001" accuracy inadequate - and built my own
> | SNIP
> | --Is this sloppy tolerance a function of software or funky hardware;
> | i.e. might one tighten up the cheap machine by swapping in some
> | ballscrews?
>
> Probably not software and probably not sloppy/funky hardware - much
> more likely a choice involving costs of the linear motion components:
> steppers, driving electronics, lead screws, etc.
>
> Software is glitzy but weak. I'd expect any CNC machine to be able to
> handle the industry-standard g-code (or equivalent) part programs.
> This is probably the Carveright's greatest weakness because it
> prevents use of generally available CAD/CAM packages.
>
> --
> Morris Dovey
> DeSoto Solar
> DeSoto, Iowa USA
> http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
>
>
>


You’ve reached the end of replies