I had a small brainstorm today and thought I'd pass it along in case
it's of use to anybody else.
I found myself having to do a bunch of taper cuts for some table legs.
Each leg consists of three pieces (hard to explain why) so I was
looking at a dozen cuts that all had to be the same. I got out the
taper jig, the one made out of two pieces of aluminum held together by
a cheap pin and adjusted by a cheap wing nut. I set it up, checked it
and rechecked it and did everything I could to put off committing to
the first cut. I was dreading what I would if the jig slipped or got
knocked before I had 12 identical tapers. That's when it occured to
me.
I grabbed a scrap of 1/2" plywood big enough to hold the work pieces
and then some. I cleaned up the edges and squared them all up to each
other. Then I laid the taper jig on it, holding them both tight to
the rip fence on my saw, and traced a pencil line along the angled
fence of the jig. Grabbed a scrap of 3/4" ply a couple inches wide
and screwed it down to the 1/2" "sled", along the pencil line,
mirroring the angle of the jig. Then I screwed another small 3/4"
scrap at the tail of the sled and square to the angled fence, to push
the end of the work piece. At the last minute I decided to add a pair
of toggle clamps to the angled fence to hold the work piece solidly
against the fence and flat on the "sled". The whole jig took me less
than 10 minutes to assemble.
I double checked my set up and ran a test cut to confirm it.
Satisfied, I relaxed and proceeded to cut a dozen matching tapers. To
rework an old phrase: "Measure twice, cut 12 times."
Hope this helps somebody,
Ian
Swingman wrote:
> Sure thing, Bubba ... like dodging bullets, is "voluntary". It may be
> different now, but 35 years ago one static line jump every three months
> was "required" by Army regulations to maintain status.
It probably is different now. In the last 20 or so years, more US troops
have died or been seriously injured in training accidents than in combat.
No, I can't back that up with any experience or any facts. It's just an
impression I have after a lot of assorted reading. One of the things the
"what's new in today's military" type blurbs focus on is how much safer
training is these days.
--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/
Swingman wrote:
> After the task is done, I have much the same feeling I got after each
> *required* parachute jump.
Interesting. In the US armed forces, the only /required/ jumps
are combat jumps - all others are voluntary; and it's possible to
leave jump status at any time up to the point when combat orders
are issued.
--
Morris Dovey
West Des Moines, Iowa USA
C links at http://www.iedu.com/c
Read my lips: The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
Perhaps he didn't know he could "quit" any time he wanted. Pehaps he did make
combat jumps. Me, I just like to see folks get off the "dope-rope" and into
freefall. More people to play with, more fun for me! Tom
Morris wrote:
>Interesting. In the US armed forces, the only /required/ jumps
>are combat jumps - all others are voluntary; and it's possible to
>leave jump status at any time up to the point when combat orders
>are issued.
Someday, it'll all be over....
"Silvan" wrote in message
> Swingman wrote:
>
> > Sure thing, Bubba ... like dodging bullets, is "voluntary". It may be
> > different now, but 35 years ago one static line jump every three months
> > was "required" by Army regulations to maintain status.
>
> It probably is different now. In the last 20 or so years, more US troops
> have died or been seriously injured in training accidents than in combat.
Bingo ... the genesis of my remark re that "cheated injury/death again"
feeling after using a taper jig. Ironically, the only time there was no
requirement to jump was my combat tour in RVN. "Inserting" into a triple
canopy LZ on the end of a helicopter rappel must of made up for it. ;>)
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 12/21/03
Sure thing, Bubba ... like dodging bullets, is "voluntary". It may be
different now, but 35 years ago one static line jump every three months was
"required" by Army regulations to maintain status.
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 12/18/03
"Morris Dovey" wrote in message
> Swingman wrote:
>
> > After the task is done, I have much the same feeling I got after each
> > *required* parachute jump.
>
> Interesting. In the US armed forces, the only /required/ jumps
> are combat jumps - all others are voluntary; and it's possible to
> leave jump status at any time up to the point when combat orders
> are issued
On 19 Dec 2003 22:48:39 -0800, [email protected] (Ian Dodd) wrote:
>I had a small brainstorm today and thought I'd pass it along in case
>it's of use to anybody else.
>
>I found myself having to do a bunch of taper cuts for some table legs.
> Each leg consists of three pieces (hard to explain why) so I was
>looking at a dozen cuts that all had to be the same. I got out the
>taper jig, the one made out of two pieces of aluminum held together by
>a cheap pin and adjusted by a cheap wing nut. I set it up, checked it
>and rechecked it and did everything I could to put off committing to
>the first cut. I was dreading what I would if the jig slipped or got
>knocked before I had 12 identical tapers. That's when it occured to
>me.
>
>I grabbed a scrap of 1/2" plywood big enough to hold the work pieces
>and then some. I cleaned up the edges and squared them all up to each
>other. Then I laid the taper jig on it, holding them both tight to
>the rip fence on my saw, and traced a pencil line along the angled
>fence of the jig. Grabbed a scrap of 3/4" ply a couple inches wide
>and screwed it down to the 1/2" "sled", along the pencil line,
>mirroring the angle of the jig. Then I screwed another small 3/4"
>scrap at the tail of the sled and square to the angled fence, to push
>the end of the work piece. At the last minute I decided to add a pair
>of toggle clamps to the angled fence to hold the work piece solidly
>against the fence and flat on the "sled". The whole jig took me less
>than 10 minutes to assemble.
>
>I double checked my set up and ran a test cut to confirm it.
>Satisfied, I relaxed and proceeded to cut a dozen matching tapers. To
>rework an old phrase: "Measure twice, cut 12 times."
>
>Hope this helps somebody,
>
>Ian
I've seen those things before. they look so cheezy and flimsy that I
can't imagine dedicating the space in the shop to STORE one, much less
plunk down $7.95 to buy it.
had a few tapers to cut last week. did it just about how you did,
except I dogged it down instead of using toggles. and my tapers were
all different, so I changed settings for each one, but you got the
idea...
Bridger
Know the feeling all too well. Although I've cut many tapered legs using one
of the aluminum jigs and never had a problem, the pucker factor goes up
every time. Cut four this week (stock 1/4" taller than the max blade height
of the TS increases pucker factor enormously), and put it off for a whole
day in hopes that they would somehow cut themselves.
After the task is done, I have much the same feeling I got after each
*required* parachute jump.
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 12/18/03
"Ian Dodd" wrote in message
> I found myself having to do a bunch of taper cuts for some table legs.
> Each leg consists of three pieces (hard to explain why) so I was
> looking at a dozen cuts that all had to be the same. I got out the
> taper jig, the one made out of two pieces of aluminum held together by
> a cheap pin and adjusted by a cheap wing nut. I set it up, checked it
> and rechecked it and did everything I could to put off committing to
> the first cut. I was dreading what I would if the jig slipped or got
> knocked before I had 12 identical tapers.
Only way now would be if the crate is going down, preferably with smoke
pouring out, so's i could be certain. What's that they used to say about
jump school?: First week separates the men from the boys, second week the
men from the fools, and in the third week the fools jump.
All the way ...
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 12/18/03
"Tom" wrote in message
> Swingman wrote:>After the task is done, I have much the same feeling I got
> after each
> >*required* parachute jump.
> Sounds like you didn't jump enough. Hook up
again!