Greetings and Salutations...
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:29:42 GMT, "Newshound" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I'm considering that dust collector. I would be interested in hearing your
>comments once you get it up and running.
>
>Dennis
>
Well, let me chime in to update MY postings on
the grizzly 1029 dust collector. I posted some time ago
about this unit (not to blow my own horn but...
<http://groups.google.com/groups?q=grizzly+1029+dust+xmundt&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=3c579f95.88104722%40basic.bs.webusenet.com&rnum=1>
Here they are).
I am still very satisfied with my unit. I have made a
tiny amount of progress at getting the complete plumbing in,
but, frankly, not much. Too many things to do and not enough
time or energy to deal with them.
It still sucks REALLY well, and the original bags are
in surprisingly good shape. There is no serious amount of dust
coming from them when it starts up. However, I would suggest
investing in the half micron, felt-type bags as an upgrade.
A friend of mine bought the same unit, and, has upgraded the
bags, and, has even LESS dust.
Still a pretty good deal for the cost, although rather
less than it was in 1999 when I bought mine.
Regards
Dave Mundt
Greetings and Salutations...
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:12:31 GMT, "Gary" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>"Dave Mundt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Greetings and Salutations...
>>
>> <snip>
>> However, I would suggest
>> investing in the half micron, felt-type bags as an upgrade.
>> A friend of mine bought the same unit, and, has upgraded the
>> bags, and, has even LESS dust.
>...
>> Regards
>> Dave Mundt
>>
>
>But Dave, it already comes with .3 micron bags standard. Should I "upgrade"
>to bigger holes? I think not. *<|:o)
>
>Thanks for the review.
>
>Gary
>
>
Hum...I did not know that. When we got ours, I believe the
bags were only about 1 or 2 micron bags...However, indeed, the finer
the better, as it is the really small stuff that leaves a person with
a really interesting sounding cough after a few years.
However...I hope it helps a bit...I also have to say that I
have seen the 1029 in commercial shops, as well as in home shops, so
it is a pretty good machine for the price.
Regards
Dave Mundt
is one
"Mikie :-)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >
> I have been trying for several days myself and have not been able to
> access the web site.
>
> Mikie :-)
Came right up tonight, but could not get to it from work today. Could not
get to it through Google either.
There appears to be some kind of firewall issue. I think they may have
changed their site recently and something they are doing now is being
choked by my firewall -- and I run 2 machines w/ different firewalls. Zone
Alarm says that it is blocking something going out on Port 80 and McAfee
says that it is blocking some UDP coming in. I have not had time to sort
this out -- and I am low-end experienced with firewalls. HTH. If anyone
has a solution, please post. -- Igor
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:16:41 GMT, "patrick conroy"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Can't hit their website in last two days?
>Just me?
>
Me too.
And, let us know if you receive it on time.
Joe
"Newshound" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I'm considering that dust collector. I would be interested in hearing
your
> comments once you get it up and running.
>
> Dennis
>
> "gary" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Works for me. I just ordered a G1029Z Dust Collector.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > "patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Can't hit their website in last two days?
> > > Just me?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Works for me. I just ordered a G1029Z Dust Collector.
Gary
"patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Can't hit their website in last two days?
> Just me?
>
>
Just tried it...the bear is there.
Joe
"patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Can't hit their website in last two days?
> Just me?
>
>
I can't either.
"patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Can't hit their website in last two days?
> Just me?
>
>
works ok for me
"Jim Giblin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:YrwSc.4121$4E1.3659@trndny07...
> I can't either.
>
> "patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Can't hit their website in last two days?
> > Just me?
> >
> >
>
>
Must be you, I've been there a couple times yesterday and a couple times
today.
--
Nahmie
The law of intelligent tinkering: save all the parts.
"patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Can't hit their website in last two days?
> Just me?
>
>
I have been on several times during the past week or so. Just tried it and
seems ok.
Ron
"patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Can't hit their website in last two days?
> Just me?
>
>
"Dave Mundt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Greetings and Salutations...
>
> <snip>
> However, I would suggest
> investing in the half micron, felt-type bags as an upgrade.
> A friend of mine bought the same unit, and, has upgraded the
> bags, and, has even LESS dust.
...
> Regards
> Dave Mundt
>
But Dave, it already comes with .3 micron bags standard. Should I "upgrade"
to bigger holes? I think not. *<|:o)
Thanks for the review.
Gary
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:16:41 GMT, "patrick conroy"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Can't hit their website in last two days?
>Just me?
>
I have been trying for several days myself and have not been able to
access the web site.
Mikie :-)
I'm considering that dust collector. I would be interested in hearing your
comments once you get it up and running.
Dennis
"gary" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Works for me. I just ordered a G1029Z Dust Collector.
>
> Gary
>
> "patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Can't hit their website in last two days?
> > Just me?
> >
> >
>
>
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:45:28 GMT, "Jim Giblin"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>I can't either.
>
>"patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Can't hit their website in last two days?
>> Just me?
>>
>>
>
came right up for me.
igor <[email protected]> wrote:
>There appears to be some kind of firewall issue. I think they may have
>changed their site recently and something they are doing now is being
>choked by my firewall -- and I run 2 machines w/ different firewalls. Zone
>Alarm says that it is blocking something going out on Port 80 and McAfee
>says that it is blocking some UDP coming in. I have not had time to sort
>this out -- and I am low-end experienced with firewalls. HTH. If anyone
>has a solution, please post. -- Igor
>
>
>On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:16:41 GMT, "patrick conroy"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Can't hit their website in last two days?
>>Just me?
>>
I also am having problems reaching Grizzly, and am accessing the web
through a router. Someone else mentioned not being able to reach it
from work, but okay from home. I think you might be onto something
here.
--
Alex
Make the obvious change in the return address to reply by email.
[email protected] (JPLipe) wrote:
>>I also am having problems reaching Grizzly, and am accessing the web
>>through a router.
>
>Well there's your problem. You'll have much better luck using a computer.
>
>(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
>
>John
LOL! I didn't even intend the pun!
Seriously, though, the firewall does seem to be the problem. Grizzly
emails also have stopped showing me their HTML content from the site.
I just did an experiment of turning off my network and connecting
through dial-up, and the site works fine that way. So they are
presumably doing something that firewalls don't like.
I sent an email to grizzly CSR, and referenced this discussion. We'll
see if anything gets fixed.
I'm not planning to lower my firewall protection just to get Grizzly's
page. I'll dial up if I feel compelled.
--
Alex
Make the obvious change in the return address to reply by email.
On 12 Aug 2004 15:28:58 GMT, [email protected] (JPLipe) wrote:
>>I also am having problems reaching Grizzly, and am accessing the web
>>through a router.
>
>Well there's your problem. You'll have much better luck using a computer.
>
>(Sorry, couldn't resist.)
>
>John
Actually, I've had no problem connecting using my TS. And, the CIA sends
stuff right to my brain. I need to go out and get some more aluminum foil.
Quick!
"patrick conroy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"alexy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>
>> I sent an email to grizzly CSR, and referenced this discussion. We'll
>
>Alex - can you post that email address? I feel somewhat obligated to let
>them know that I can't access their site.
>
[email protected]
I don't know if it is the right address, but I asked them to forward
it to whoever was in charge of the web site.
--
Alex
Make the obvious change in the return address to reply by email.
"alexy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I sent an email to grizzly CSR, and referenced this discussion. We'll
Alex - can you post that email address? I feel somewhat obligated to let
them know that I can't access their site.