Joe_Stein wrote:
> I seldom, if ever flame anyone. I also don't support anyone. We all have our
> good and bad days, and same goes for moods. We're only human.
> Joe (the forgiver)
>
> "Bay Area Dave" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:%[email protected]...
>
>>Just wondering...Watson's lead should be followed by his
>>avid supporters.
>>
>>dave
>>
>
>
>
now you've got the attitude I LIKE, Joe! :) There are a
handful of folks here who have never jumped on the
miscreant's bandwagon, since they are secure enough to not
need to "fit in" with the good (term used loosely) ole boys.
Leon is one stand up guy who never gets down in the
gutter to sidle up with the miscreants when its time for a
"lynching". Others are afraid to speak up out of fear of
retribution. I'm not much for being afraid. :)
What I'll never figure out is why the miscreants think they
can "shun" me, unless I CHOOSE to let them play their silly
game. If I REALLY needed their feedback, I'd change my
screen name as often as it took. It's easy to assume
another persona and post to my hearts content. BUT, I have
zero desire to interact with those bozos, so I'm in hog
heaven now that I can respond to woodworking related threads
without having to constantly do battle with those twits.
I suggest you keep a low profile in order not to piss off
the woodworking gods (miscreants) if you don't want to be
shunned too.
cheers!
dave
In article <[email protected]>, J T
<[email protected]> wrote:
> That's it, he burbled.
That doesn't involve corn, does it?
Sun, Jul 4, 2004, 9:53pm (EDT-2) dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_S.balderstone.ca
(Dave=A0Balderstone) queries:
That doesn't involve corn, does it?
I would think not, at least in connection with burbled.
However, you could be thinking of other word that ends in "ed",
such as "gurgled", rather than "burbled". In that case, perhaps. If
that is indeed the case, then possibly it should also be used in
conjunction with words such as, "packed", "plugged", "pounded", etc., as
in "full of".
JOAT
Just because it's not nice doesn't mean it's not miraculous.
- Interesting Times
Mon, Jul 5, 2004, 12:23am (EDT+4) [email protected] he who shall not be
named, burbled:
That's it, he burbled.
JOAT
Just because it's not nice doesn't mean it's not miraculous.
- Interesting Times
J T wrote:
> Mon, Jul 5, 2004, 12:23am (EDT+4) [email protected] he who shall not be
> named, burbled:
>
> That's it, he burbled.
>
> JOAT
> Just because it's not nice doesn't mean it's not miraculous.
> - Interesting Times
>
aren't you one of the "undersigned"? If you aren't, PLEASE
sign up ASAP. Thank you for your cooperation!
dave
Dave Balderstone wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, J T
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> That's it, he burbled.
>
>
> That doesn't involve corn, does it?
dammit! you are getting perilously close to responding to
me. At this point you are responding by proxy. Please
respect your own promise.
dave
I seldom, if ever flame anyone. I also don't support anyone. We all have our
good and bad days, and same goes for moods. We're only human.
Joe (the forgiver)
"Bay Area Dave" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:%[email protected]...
> Just wondering...Watson's lead should be followed by his
> avid supporters.
>
> dave
>
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:23:14 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]> vaguely
proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email
> Leon is one stand up guy who never gets down in the
>gutter to sidle up with the miscreants when its time for a
>"lynching". Others are afraid to speak up out of fear of
>retribution. I'm not much for being afraid. :)
Lynching! You walk into a Leeds United bar with a a target on your
Arsenal, and wonder why you get hit!
When it got too personal, you sent messages wondering why it was so
peaceful. You stir. You _want_ trouble, for its own sake.
Bay Area Dave wrote:
> Just wondering...Watson's lead should be followed by his avid supporters.
>
> dave
>
and I forgot to mention that I expect this thread to raise
not a SINGLE complaint, as I have supposedly been
effectively shunned by the entire crew of miscreants.
Anyone who would NOW complain about my post should join the
miscreants, and PUBLICLY declare that they too, are now
"shunning" me.
What a bunch of adolescent morons!! Tee hee! It's so
LIBERATING to speak my mind without having to D&R. :)
dave
Old Nick wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:23:14 GMT, Bay Area Dave <[email protected]> vaguely
> proposed a theory
> ......and in reply I say!:
>
> remove ns from my header address to reply via email
>
>
>> Leon is one stand up guy who never gets down in the
>>gutter to sidle up with the miscreants when its time for a
>>"lynching". Others are afraid to speak up out of fear of
>>retribution. I'm not much for being afraid. :)
>
>
> Lynching! You walk into a Leeds United bar with a a target on your
> Arsenal, and wonder why you get hit!
>
> When it got too personal, you sent messages wondering why it was so
> peaceful. You stir. You _want_ trouble, for its own sake.
>
>
>
>
nah, I don't expect any trouble, because the troublemakers
have agreed to ignore me! Don't you GET IT?? I'm free to
post my thoughts without starting WWIII. I don't WANT
trouble, AND I don't expect any. So don't get your nose out
of joint; if you don't like my thread, just ignore it.
dave