I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
swirl
marks on anything. Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
my
pieces. Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
stain or other finish to the piece. Anyone have any ideas on how to
fix my sanders to prevent this? Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
On Mar 11, 5:10 pm, "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah I have not yet parted or retired my Sped Bloc. It is still relative
> new at 2 years old It replaced a Sped Bloc that lasted 18 years. But darn
> it puts up a cloud of dust. I wonder if the Festool Finish sander is as
> good.
It's a trap everybody!!! Run away!!!
Robert
Another vote for Scraping.
For flat cut surfaces, use better quality saw blades with dampeners. You
won't need to sand or scrape sawn surfaces after cutting. Items sell for >
$1000, never a touch of sandpaper and look better than sanded ever can.
(glossier, like scraping results)
Something else to try for general sanding, YMMV, lightly mist (not wet)
the work first to raise the grain, sand, then allow to fully dry.
Use suction during sanding, hook up a shopvac/dust collector to the
sander, not just a dust bag, to the dust port of the orbital sander.
Also I use an Oil-less (airbrush) air compressor to remove dust from work
and sanding pad. Not too much air pressure on the work or you'll be
"sandblasting".
On Mar 12, 12:17=A0am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Mar 11, 5:10 pm, "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yeah I have not yet parted or retired my Sped Bloc. =A0It is still relat=
ive
> > new at 2 years old It replaced a Sped Bloc that lasted 18 years. =A0But =
darn
> > it puts up a cloud of dust. =A0I wonder if the Festool Finish sander is =
as
> > good.
>
> It's a trap everybody!!! Run away!!!
>
> Robert
It'd be hard to beat this little thing:
http://www.internationaltool.com/woodworking/tools/bos1297dk.html
When you buy the vacuum attachment, and attach it to a Fein II or
CT22...NO dust.. hell, the sander sticks to the surface... I can't
imagine The Green/Black Boys doing a better job......but then again, I
have made that error in judgement before...
I got my little Bosch for 49 dollars, IIRC.. and just love it. I Get
out my hole-punch set and whack away and make a stack of 6-hole 1/4
sheets sandpapers. Even the dust collection that comes with it is
quite effective...but just for a little while.
To change the paper is just a snap.. easiest ever.
marc wrote:
> I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
> finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
> swirl
> marks on anything. Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
> Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
> my
> pieces. Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
> stain or other finish to the piece. Anyone have any ideas on how to
> fix my sanders to prevent this? Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
> sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
I have a ridged 1/4 sheet sander that leaves these swirl marks. For the
final grit I am doing it by hand to ensure I don't see them.
If anyone has other tips I'd be happy to hear them!
On Mar 11, 11:33 am, marc <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
> finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
> swirl
> marks on anything. Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
> Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
> my
> pieces. Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
> stain or other finish to the piece. Anyone have any ideas on how to
> fix my sanders to prevent this? Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
> sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
Use a 220 disc, then hand sand with 180. Or forget the ROS and
use a belt sander.
On Mar 11, 5:08 pm, "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:e80195cb-334c-4413-80da-382b11de2eba@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>> Now I'm putting on some mittens so I won't be tempted type and extoll
> >the virtues of a Rotex sander..*
>
> Aw go ahead ant tell us again, cause I have mine now and will not be green
> with envy.. ;~)
Awww go ahead. I know you two are probably about to bust over there.
I'm surprised it has taken this long for the green gremlins to
surface. ;^)
Go get 'em boys.
Robert
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:33:00 -0700 (PDT), marc <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
>finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
>swirl
>marks on anything. Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
>Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
>my
>pieces. Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
>stain or other finish to the piece. Anyone have any ideas on how to
>fix my sanders to prevent this? Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
>sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
Every sander leaves some kind of marks. With a ROS the thing is to
not let any swirls from the coarse grits slip through to the end, or
introduce new ones by some foreign matter getting into the works, so
that when you are done you just have uniform very fine swirls. Then a
light hand sanding is all you need.
Your old ROS probably did the same thing, you've just gotten better
and are looking harder at your work and expecting more. This is a
good thing.
-Leuf
"marc" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
> finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
> swirl
> marks on anything. Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
> Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
> my
> pieces. Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
> stain or other finish to the piece. Anyone have any ideas on how to
> fix my sanders to prevent this? Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
> sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
I always follow up with a 1/4 sheet sander or hand sanding. I never owned a
ROS that didn't leave swirls.
Charley
"marc" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
> finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
> swirl
> marks on anything. Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
> Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
> my
> pieces. Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
> stain or other finish to the piece. Anyone have any ideas on how to
> fix my sanders to prevent this? Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
> sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
Be sure to completely wipe off the work between grits and don't skip grits
for "better' results. You need to have a very small random orbit if you are
going to use a ROS for the final standings.
"marc" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
> finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
> swirl
> marks on anything. Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
> Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
> my
> pieces. Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
> stain or other finish to the piece. Anyone have any ideas on how to
> fix my sanders to prevent this? Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
> sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
I still go to my old Speed block orbital for the next to final sanding.
Final, after a setup with water, is always by hand. Everything said in the
thread is true. Clean between and keep things flat without pressing. But
it's better to go with a small-orbit orbital, versus Randomfor the last, in
my experience.
BTW, there are so many grits of paper out there that the phrase "don't skip
a grit" is even more meaningless than usual where start and end are
unspecified. Don't make big jumps in number or expect to sand longer.
Also, make sure you're in the same system, or you'll wonder why the P400
doesn't do any better than CAMI 320.
"Robatoy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:e80195cb-334c-4413-80da-382b11de2eba@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Now I'm putting on some mittens so I won't be tempted type and extoll
the virtues of a Rotex sander..*
Aw go ahead ant tell us again, cause I have mine now and will not be green
with envy.. ;~)
"George" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "marc" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
>> finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
>> swirl
>> marks on anything. Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
>> Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
>> my
>> pieces. Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
>> stain or other finish to the piece. Anyone have any ideas on how to
>> fix my sanders to prevent this? Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
>> sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
>
> I still go to my old Speed block orbital for the next to final sanding.
> Final, after a setup with water, is always by hand. Everything said in
> the thread is true. Clean between and keep things flat without pressing.
> But it's better to go with a small-orbit orbital, versus Randomfor the
> last, in my experience.
Yeah I have not yet parted or retired my Sped Bloc. It is still relative
new at 2 years old It replaced a Sped Bloc that lasted 18 years. But darn
it puts up a cloud of dust. I wonder if the Festool Finish sander is as
good.
On Mar 11, 1:33=A0pm, Leuf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:33:00 -0700 (PDT), marc <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
> >finally bit the dust a year of so ago. =A0Great sander, never left
> >swirl
> >marks on anything. =A0Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
> >Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
> >my
> >pieces. =A0Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
> >stain or other finish to the piece. =A0Anyone have any ideas on how to
> >fix my sanders to prevent this? =A0Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
> >sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
>
> Every sander leaves some kind of marks. =A0With a ROS the thing is to
> not let any swirls from the coarse grits slip through to the end, or
> introduce new ones by some foreign matter getting into the works, so
> that when you are done you just have uniform very fine swirls. =A0Then a
> light hand sanding is all you need.
>
> Your old ROS probably did the same thing, you've just gotten better
> and are looking harder at your work and expecting more. =A0This is a
> good thing.
>
> -Leuf
The joy of reading a concise, level-headed reply.
Add to that, Leon's suggestion to blow off the grit from the previous
sand-paper, and you WILL get results.
Do not skip grades.
In the final stages, look for good dust removal and minimal pressure
on the sander.
Keep your paper fresh and your target clean.
*now I'm putting on some mittens so I won't be tempted type and extoll
the virtues of a Rotex sander..*
On Mar 11, 11:33 am, marc <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
> finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
> swirl
> marks on anything. Since then, I have bought and cursed at the
> Ridgid, DeWalt, and Porter Cable sanders for leaving swirl marks on
> my
> pieces. Very faint on bare wood, but clearly visible when I apply
> stain or other finish to the piece. Anyone have any ideas on how to
> fix my sanders to prevent this? Or is it back to the old 1/4 sheet
> sanders for 180 and 220 final sandings??
Start the sander above the work and slowly lower it onto the
work, then lift it off while it is still running. Do not press down
on it at all, the weight of the sander is sufficient. Move it
very slowly and steadily over the wood, do not stroke the
wood with the sander. Clean the paper frequently using
one of those gum rubber blocks. Don't skip any grits
on your way down and finish with a finer grit than you
have been using. Finish with light hand-sanding in the
direction of the grain using a sanding block and paper
one step up from the last stage of ROS sanding.
Or, for softwoods,
don't sand at all, use a #3 or #4 smoothing plane,
or a Knight hand-made wooden bodied smoother.
Or, for hardwoods,
don't sand at all, use a smoothing plane and
follow with a cabinet scraper if need be.
Or, (so I've been told) for a very hard wood like
ebony or rosewood follow the cabinet scraper
with hand sanding starting with 400 grit, and
keep going down in grits until the unfinished
wood is glossy. You can get paper down to
2000 grit at auto parts stores and can get
white corundum paper by mail order.
Sanding is a PIA. Planing and scraping is a joy,
at least until your thumbs get sore. Then you'll
start hunting for scraper planes.
--
FF
Leuf wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:33:00 -0700 (PDT), marc <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I had an older model of the Porter Cable 5" random orbit sander that
>> finally bit the dust a year of so ago. Great sander, never left
>> swirl marks on anything. ...
...
> Every sander leaves some kind of marks. With a ROS the thing is to
> not let any swirls from the coarse grits slip through to the end, or
> introduce new ones by some foreign matter getting into the works, so
> that when you are done you just have uniform very fine swirls. Then a
> light hand sanding is all you need.
>
> Your old ROS probably did the same thing, you've just gotten better
> and are looking harder at your work and expecting more. This is a
> good thing.
While the advice is generally good and certainly not letting large grit
carry over is mandatory, I'll agree w/ marc that I've not had problems
w/ old P-C's leaving detectable swirl on pieces even after
staining/finishing.
I can't comment on new P-C's or other varieties as I only have old P-C's.
I would expect that from any and would tend to put blame on paper and
final grit more than the sander itself, but again I've none others to
compare to...
$0.02, imo, ymmv, etc., etc., etc., ...
--
"Fred the Red Shirt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:f45c0640-5844-4d58-9e40-1055cdf3c279@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> Start the sander above the work and slowly lower it onto the
> work, then lift it off while it is still running.
A word of warning about that technique, older PC ROS sanders will dig a
divot in the surface almost instantly with that approach. Those old PC
sanders had no brake and would go into spin mode rather than random.
>
> Sanding is a PIA.
Awh, you just have not gotten to use a really good sander yet. ;~)
Planing and scraping is a joy,
> at least until your thumbs get sore. Then you'll
> start hunting for scraper planes.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:05:52 -0500, Leon wrote:
>> Start the sander above the work and slowly lower it onto the
>> work, then lift it off while it is still running.
>
> A word of warning about that technique, older PC ROS sanders will dig a
> divot in the surface almost instantly with that approach. Those old PC
> sanders had no brake and would go into spin mode rather than random.
Correct. My old Bosch specifically states to start and stop it while it
sits on the work. I usually sand to 220 and I haven't seen any swirl
problem.