MZ

"Mike Zielinski"

02/09/2003 8:33 PM

what the

so if you send a message and your not part of the in crowd it doesn't show
up?

--

Mike Z


This topic has 15 replies

rR

[email protected] (Rich Stern)

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

04/09/2003 1:54 AM

>so if you send a message and your not part of the in crowd it doesn't show
>up?
>
>--
>
>Mike Z
>

You are the victim of a conspiracy.

No one will admit to that, of course. :)

Rich S.

pR

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

04/09/2003 12:41 PM

Dear Mike Z:

Posts and Responses usually don't show up immediately. Sometimes it
takes a few minutes or an hour or longer. This is common among NG's like
this one. You are not being picked on (yet). Otherwise, how could I have
responded to you? I do agree, though, that there is an "in crowd" here,
but it is not as bad as it was a year ago when one Know-It-All took it
upon himself to be the Group Cop. Whatta Jerk.

pR

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

04/09/2003 12:46 PM

Another problem here is the dozens of Off-Topic entries each day, which
push valid posts off the board. I have reported a certain Jewish.com to
my server's Abuse and Spam bureaus because I found that my email address
had been harvested without my permission from this group.

OB

Other Brother Kevin

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

06/09/2003 10:54 AM

Mike Zielinski wrote:

>so if you send a message and your not part of the in crowd it doesn't show
>up?
>
>--
>
>Mike Z
>
>
>
>
Don't you just love newbies. He most likely didn't read the FAQs on this

http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/roche/wood.html

Or DAGS (Done (DO) a Google Search) on this

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&group=rec.woodworking

To pop your ego balloon, there is no conspiracy, only dumb newbies

OB Kevin

Don't worry about the horse being blind,
LOAD THE WAGON!


Cw

"ChairMan"

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

05/09/2003 3:48 AM

In news:[email protected],
Larry Jaques <jake@di\/ersify.com> spewed forth and said:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 03:25:42 GMT, "ChairMan" <[email protected]> pixelated:
>
>>>> You are the victim of a conspiracy.
>
> It's true. And they ARE out to get him.
>
>
>>> Of the vast, right-wing variety?
>>
>> Of course it is, there's no such thing as a left-wing conspiracy<eg>
>
> Oh yeah? Check out this link:
> http://www.ravnwood.com/archives/cat_leftwing_conspiracy.shtml
>
> Or just ask MJ Kopechne, et al. There may be a few.
>


Well those are just lies, the left is always the ones to save the day.
Who do you think originated the saying "I'm from the government and I'm here
to help"? <g>

JB

"J.B. Bobbitt"

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

05/09/2003 12:13 AM

Pluswhich, your ISP affects your posts. I went through a rough spell w/ my
ISP where about 50% of my posts and replies never showed up.

-JBB


"Mike Zielinski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> so if you send a message and your not part of the in crowd it doesn't show
> up?
>
> --
>
> Mike Z
>
>

jj

jo4hn

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

04/09/2003 2:54 PM

Rich Stern wrote:
>>so if you send a message and your not part of the in crowd it doesn't show
>>up?
>>
>>--
>>
>>Mike Z
>>
>
>
> You are the victim of a conspiracy.
>
> No one will admit to that, of course. :)
>
> Rich S.
>
There is no cabal.

sD

[email protected] (Doug Miller)

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

04/09/2003 2:04 AM

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Rich Stern) wrote:
>>so if you send a message and your not part of the in crowd it doesn't show
>>up?
>>
>>--
>>
>>Mike Z
>>
>
>You are the victim of a conspiracy.

Of the vast, right-wing variety?

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)

rR

[email protected] (Rich Stern)

in reply to [email protected] (Doug Miller) on 04/09/2003 2:04 AM

04/09/2003 3:48 AM

>>You are the victim of a conspiracy.
>
>Of the vast, right-wing variety?
>
>--
>Regards,
> Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)

Sorry, not that exciting. Just a plain, old-fashioned,
lacking-a-political-label conspiracy.

Rich S.

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to [email protected] (Doug Miller) on 04/09/2003 2:04 AM

04/09/2003 4:00 PM

On 04 Sep 2003 03:48:40 GMT, [email protected] (Rich Stern) pixelated:

>>>You are the victim of a conspiracy.
>>
>>Of the vast, right-wing variety?
>>
>>--
>>Regards,
>> Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
>
>Sorry, not that exciting. Just a plain, old-fashioned,
>lacking-a-political-label conspiracy.

Let's give that thang a label right now: VWC

It stands for "Vast Wingless Conspiracy"


-- Friends Don't Let Friends Eat Turkey and Drive --
http://diversify.com Website Programming and Development

BS

"Bob Schmall"

in reply to [email protected] (Doug Miller) on 04/09/2003 2:04 AM

04/09/2003 6:16 PM


"Larry Jaques" <jake@di\/ersify.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 04 Sep 2003 03:48:40 GMT, [email protected] (Rich Stern) pixelated:
>
> >>>You are the victim of a conspiracy.
> >>
> >>Of the vast, right-wing variety?
> >>
> >>--
> >>Regards,
> >> Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
> >
> >Sorry, not that exciting. Just a plain, old-fashioned,
> >lacking-a-political-label conspiracy.
>
> Let's give that thang a label right now: VWC
>
> It stands for "Vast Wingless Conspiracy"

Beautiful. You have such a way wit woids, Larry.

Bob

Cw

"ChairMan"

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

04/09/2003 3:25 AM

In news:[email protected],
Doug Miller <[email protected]> spewed forth and said:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Rich Stern) wrote:
>>> so if you send a message and your not part of the in crowd it
>>> doesn't show up?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Mike Z
>>>
>>
>> You are the victim of a conspiracy.
>
> Of the vast, right-wing variety?

Of course it is, there's no such thing as a left-wing conspiracy<eg>


Rl

Ramsey

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

04/09/2003 12:42 PM

That woudn;t be Lyle Harwood would it? Seems like he is the new
self-appointed cop for this NG.


On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:41:01 -0400 (EDT), [email protected] (RM MS)
wrote:

>Dear Mike Z:
>
>Posts and Responses usually don't show up immediately. Sometimes it
>takes a few minutes or an hour or longer. This is common among NG's like
>this one. You are not being picked on (yet). Otherwise, how could I have
>responded to you? I do agree, though, that there is an "in crowd" here,
>but it is not as bad as it was a year ago when one Know-It-All took it
>upon himself to be the Group Cop. Whatta Jerk.

ND

"Norman D. Crow"

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

04/09/2003 1:24 AM


"Mike Zielinski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> so if you send a message and your not part of the in crowd it doesn't show
> up?
>
> --
>
> Mike Z
Are you referring to your post about "what is runout" on the drill press
thread? I saw it.
Nahmie

BS

"Ben Siders"

in reply to "Mike Zielinski" on 02/09/2003 8:33 PM

04/09/2003 6:15 PM

On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:41:01 -0400, RM MS wrote:

> Dear Mike Z:
>
> Posts and Responses usually don't show up immediately. Sometimes it
> takes a few minutes or an hour or longer. This is common among NG's like
> this one. You are not being picked on (yet). Otherwise, how could I have
> responded to you? I do agree, though, that there is an "in crowd" here,
> but it is not as bad as it was a year ago when one Know-It-All took it
> upon himself to be the Group Cop. Whatta Jerk.

Yeah, I've had posts not show up for sometimes more than 2 days, although
usually they're nearly immediate. If there's an "in-crowd" here, I
haven't seen it, although I could name a few people who feel compelled to
respond to basically everything they read, whether they know anything
about the matter at hand or not. But, this doesn't bother me, at least
they're on-topic. I've had to aggressively scrub for off-topic material.


You’ve reached the end of replies