b

30/04/2006 10:16 PM

a carpentry terminology question.

this was forwarded to me... I guess somebody thinks I'm an expert or
something, but I don't have an answer. so what do y'all think?


>
> This has been bothering me for a few years. Their are a
> pair of words used in carpentry, and I can't for the life of me,
> recall what these two words are. I had heard them many years
> ago, and they have escaped my memory. If anybody can tell me
> what these two words are, I would much appreciate it.
> I recall that they were one syllable words. The word
> "kerf" comes to mind, and that word may be similar to the words I
> am looking for, but the word "kerf" means somthing entirely different.
>
> When making certain cuts with a circular saw, the saw
> doesn't make a straight butt edge at the end of the cut, due to the
> circular nature of the blade. There is a little piece of wood
> left over, which generally needs to be cut with a hand saw, to make
> the end of the cut straight, yet not "overcutting" into the piece
> you want to save.
> There is a specific WORD for this little leftover piece of
> wood. What is that word?
>
> This word actually comes as a pair of words. In
> different cuts of wood, there is complimentary piece leftover
> wood, not the inside leftover piece, but an outside leftover piece,
> which also has it's own name. That would be the other word I am
> looking for.
>
> I have often heard, when a person doesn't know how to
> spell a word, someone will tell them "look it up in the
> dictionary". Well, how are they suppose to look it up if they
> don't know how to spell it?
> I sometimes wish there were a "back door" to the
> dictionary. When you know the definition of a word, but you don't
> know the word, there should be some way to look it up.


This topic has 5 replies

b

in reply to [email protected] on 30/04/2006 10:16 PM

01/05/2006 8:08 PM

nobody else has a name for that little remainder either, eh?

p

in reply to [email protected] on 30/04/2006 10:16 PM

01/05/2006 8:27 PM


[email protected] wrote:
> nobody else has a name for that little remainder either, eh?

I guess not...

Myself, I never knew that little piece had a name; I've heard it just
called the drop or waste or somesuch, even though those are general
terms not specific to that, um, thing.

-Phil Crow

Rr

"RicodJour"

in reply to [email protected] on 30/04/2006 10:16 PM

01/05/2006 8:48 PM

[email protected] wrote:
> nobody else has a name for that little remainder either, eh?

Not me. Looks like you can claim discovery by christening it with some
variant of your name. Kerf bridger? Works for me. ;)

R

Br

"BuilderBob46"

in reply to [email protected] on 30/04/2006 10:16 PM

02/05/2006 6:09 AM

In the days of the great explorers, the discoverer of an unnamed land
got to name it. Go for it.

Gw

Guess who

in reply to [email protected] on 30/04/2006 10:16 PM

02/05/2006 8:39 AM

On 1 May 2006 20:27:25 -0700, [email protected] wrote:

>
>[email protected] wrote:
>> nobody else has a name for that little remainder either, eh?
>
>I guess not...
>
>Myself, I never knew that little piece had a name; I've heard it just
>called the drop or waste or somesuch, even though those are general
>terms not specific to that, um, thing.

It doesn't. Not everything needs a name where a description will do.
When you clip your toenails and the first cut is incomplete, and
leaves a bit hanging until you nip it off, that doesn't have a name
either. It's just chatter for the sake of chatter.


You’ve reached the end of replies