On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:49:25 -0800 (PST), RonB <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Monday, December 31, 2012 11:52:46 PM UTC-6, Zz Yzx wrote:
>> 1. Kathy Griffith peristently trying to give Anderson Cooper a hummer
>>
>> on national television after the New Years Eve Ball drop.
>>
>>
>>
>> (At least feighning it; still, it was pretty odd, and went on and
>>
>> on).
>
>Yeah - I posted a comment about this on another group. CNN wants us to think they are the most reputable of the news stations. Yet they allow one of their ace newsmen to be seen with her in this situation for two years in a row! Last year she ended in her bra during the same moment, exactly when CNN analyst David Gergen called Anderson to wish him happy new year. This year it just went on and on. I suspect some folks tuned in thinking it was going to be family-rated entertainment - cover the kids eyes!!
>
>Apparently Cooper and Griffith are friends. But as an openly gay, but conservative, news personality he really doesn't need this kind of exposure. I can't imagine what CNN management is thinking.
Cooper conservative? Now *THAT'S* funny!
tiredofspam <nospam.nospam.com> wrote:
> On 1/1/2013 12:52 AM, Zz Yzx wrote:
>> 1. Kathy Griffith peristently trying to give Anderson Cooper a hummer
>> on national television after the New Years Eve Ball drop.
>>
>> (At least feighning it; still, it was pretty odd, and went on and
>> on).
>>
> Obviously she needs the ratings and will do anything.
> She must be at the bottom of her career and desperate.
Two things
1. Her gay-rar obviously is not working and
2. Her make-up artist is worth every penny he charged her. You should see
her with out.
https://www.google.com/search?q=kathy+griffin&hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=az7jUJiXO4fC2wWDtIH4CA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=768&bih=928#biv=i|0;d|PEew5NyVGSpIHM:
On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 9:27:30 PM UTC-6, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:10:31 -0800, Zz Yzx
>=20
> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> >
>=20
> >Now, if SNL does the EXACT same bit, it'll be WAY funny. Go figure.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Nah, SNL hasn't been funny for at least 20 years now.
Agreed. The newer SNL performers just aren't in the same category as Chevy=
, Gilda, Dan, John and the early crew. But then the younger folks might be=
easier to entertain since many of them spend their lives sitting and keyin=
g. The old crew had, and used imagination - a dying trait among humans.
RonB
On Monday, December 31, 2012 11:52:46 PM UTC-6, Zz Yzx wrote:
> 1. Kathy Griffith peristently trying to give Anderson Cooper a hummer
>=20
> on national television after the New Years Eve Ball drop.=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> (At least feighning it; still, it was pretty odd, and went on and
>=20
> on).
Yeah - I posted a comment about this on another group. CNN wants us to thi=
nk they are the most reputable of the news stations. Yet they allow one of=
their ace newsmen to be seen with her in this situation for two years in a=
row! Last year she ended in her bra during the same moment, exactly when =
CNN analyst David Gergen called Anderson to wish him happy new year. This y=
ear it just went on and on. I suspect some folks tuned in thinking it was =
going to be family-rated entertainment - cover the kids eyes!!
Apparently Cooper and Griffith are friends. But as an openly gay, but cons=
ervative, news personality he really doesn't need this kind of exposure. I=
can't imagine what CNN management is thinking.
RonB
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:05:01 -0500, "G. Ross" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Unquestionably Confused wrote:
>> On 1/1/2013 1:54 PM, Leon wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Two things
>>>
>>> 1. Her gay-rar obviously is not working and
>>>
>>> 2. Her make-up artist is worth every penny he charged her. You should see
>>> her with out.
>>>
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=kathy+griffin&hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=az7jUJiXO4fC2wWDtIH4CA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=768&bih=928#biv=i|0;d|PEew5NyVGSpIHM:
>>
>>
>> One thing, Leon... You obviously didn't look hard enough. In your link
>> she looks world class, try this one:
>>
>> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/kathy-griffin-without-makeup-photos_n_1901161.html>
>>
>> Enough to gag a maggot.
>>
>
>Is that a mustache I see?
Aw, c'mon. She's 53, fer chrissake. Look at all the rest of the w/o
makeup stars in that link. Ick! Makeup is man's good friend.
--
Inside every older person is a younger person wondering WTF happened.
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:10:31 -0800, Zz Yzx <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>Now, if SNL does the EXACT same bit, it'll be WAY funny. Go figure.
Nah, SNL hasn't been funny for at least 20 years now.
On 1/1/2013 1:54 PM, Leon wrote:
>
> Two things
>
> 1. Her gay-rar obviously is not working and
>
> 2. Her make-up artist is worth every penny he charged her. You should see
> her with out.
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=kathy+griffin&hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=az7jUJiXO4fC2wWDtIH4CA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=768&bih=928#biv=i|0;d|PEew5NyVGSpIHM:
One thing, Leon... You obviously didn't look hard enough. In your link
she looks world class, try this one:
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/kathy-griffin-without-makeup-photos_n_1901161.html>
Enough to gag a maggot.
On 1/2/2013 8:20 AM, Leon wrote:
> On 1/2/2013 7:50 AM, Unquestionably Confused wrote:
>>
>> One thing, Leon... You obviously didn't look hard enough. In your link
>> she looks world class, try this one:
>>
>> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/kathy-griffin-without-makeup-photos_n_1901161.html>
>>
>>
>>
>> Enough to gag a maggot.
>>
>
>
> Actually that is the one that I referred to. Oddly the link worked
> correctly on my iPad.
Whew! Okay, your tastebuds are intact. Your eyes, like mine, probably
feel like you've jammed a couple of 10-penny nails in them<g>
When I used your link it was truncated and I had to manually add the
last 5 to 7 characters. The result was something quite different,
She'd pull at least a "7" at ten minutes to closing at the bar<g>
"Unquestionably Confused" wrote:
> One thing, Leon... You obviously didn't look hard enough. In your
> link she looks world class, try this one:
>
> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/kathy-griffin-without-makeup-photos_n_1901161.html>
>
> Enough to gag a maggot.
>
------------------------------------------------
A classic 3 bag job.
Lew
On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 10:24:25 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:49:25 -0800 (PST), RonB <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cooper conservative? Now *THAT'S* funny!
Bad word choice. He is certainly among the liberal media. But as an openly gay person, he does not flaunt it like some celebrities or retail chain representatives.
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 7:50:19 AM UTC-6, Unquestionably Confused wrote:
> On 1/1/2013 1:54 PM, Leon wrote:
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Two things
>
> >
>
> > 1. Her gay-rar obviously is not working and
>
> >
>
> > 2. Her make-up artist is worth every penny he charged her. You should see
>
> > her with out.
>
> >
>
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=kathy+griffin&hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=az7jUJiXO4fC2wWDtIH4CA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=768&bih=928#biv=i|0;d|PEew5NyVGSpIHM:
>
>
>
>
>
> One thing, Leon... You obviously didn't look hard enough. In your link
>
> she looks world class, try this one:
>
>
>
> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/kathy-griffin-without-makeup-photos_n_1901161.html>
>
>
>
> Enough to gag a maggot.
Wow - she needs to get her face pulled back a little more. Pretty soon here ears will be in the back of her head.
On 1/1/2013 2:54 PM, Leon wrote:
> tiredofspam <nospam.nospam.com> wrote:
>> On 1/1/2013 12:52 AM, Zz Yzx wrote:
>>> 1. Kathy Griffith peristently trying to give Anderson Cooper a hummer
>>> on national television after the New Years Eve Ball drop.
>>>
>>> (At least feighning it; still, it was pretty odd, and went on and
>>> on).
>>>
>> Obviously she needs the ratings and will do anything.
>> She must be at the bottom of her career and desperate.
>
>
> Two things
>
> 1. Her gay-rar obviously is not working and
>
> 2. Her make-up artist is worth every penny he charged her. You should see
> her with out.
No thanks.
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=kathy+griffin&hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=az7jUJiXO4fC2wWDtIH4CA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=768&bih=928#biv=i|0;d|PEew5NyVGSpIHM:
>
"Ed Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:10:31 -0800, Zz Yzx <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Now, if SNL does the EXACT same bit, it'll be WAY funny. Go figure.
>
> Nah, SNL hasn't been funny for at least 20 years now.
Closer to 25+.... Once the original cast was gone... I'm sure it was just
the cast changes that made the difference.... it couldn't possibly be due to
my maturation and my not hanging out in college town bars watching the show
on the big projection TVs... ;~)
On 1/2/2013 9:17 AM, Swingman wrote:
> On 1/1/2013 10:35 PM, John Grossbohlin wrote:
>>
>> "Ed Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:10:31 -0800, Zz Yzx <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, if SNL does the EXACT same bit, it'll be WAY funny. Go figure.
>>>
>>> Nah, SNL hasn't been funny for at least 20 years now.
>>
>> Closer to 25+.... Once the original cast was gone... I'm sure it was
>> just the cast changes that made the difference.... it couldn't possibly
>> be due to my maturation and my not hanging out in college town bars
>> watching the show on the big projection TVs... ;~)
>
> Easy to check out: Watch 'em again on YouTube (they're all there) ... if
> they're still funny to you, so much for your maturation theory. :)
>
> BTW, to me, they are still funny ... particularly John Belushi, Gilda
> "Roseanne Rosanadana" Radnor, and Jane Curtain: "Well, Jane, it just
> goes to show you, it's always something; if it ain't one thing, it's
> another." :)
>
Yada yada yada yada yada yada
Yada yada yada yada yada yada
Yada yada yada yada yada yada
Yada yada yada yada yada yada
Yada yada yada yada yada yada
Yada yada yada yada yada yada
What? Ohhhh, That's different. NEVERMIND!
On 1/2/2013 8:27 AM, Unquestionably Confused wrote:
> On 1/2/2013 8:20 AM, Leon wrote:
>> On 1/2/2013 7:50 AM, Unquestionably Confused wrote:
>
>>>
>>> One thing, Leon... You obviously didn't look hard enough. In your link
>>> she looks world class, try this one:
>>>
>>> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/kathy-griffin-without-makeup-photos_n_1901161.html>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Enough to gag a maggot.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Actually that is the one that I referred to. Oddly the link worked
>> correctly on my iPad.
>
> Whew! Okay, your tastebuds are intact. Your eyes, like mine, probably
> feel like you've jammed a couple of 10-penny nails in them<g>
LOL
>
> When I used your link it was truncated and I had to manually add the
> last 5 to 7 characters. The result was something quite different, She'd
> pull at least a "7" at ten minutes to closing at the bar<g>
I did not work from my desk top either but my iPad worked out.
"John Grossbohlin" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
>
> "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> BTW, to me, they are still funny ... particularly John Belushi, Gilda
>> "Roseanne Rosanadana" Radnor, and Jane Curtain: "Well, Jane, it just goes
>> to show you, it's always something; if it ain't one thing, it's another."
>> :)
>
> The one line that stuck with me was Dan's "Jane, you ignorant slut... "
When our dog does something stupid, SWMBO says to her, "Hazel, you ignorant mutt..."
Unquestionably Confused wrote:
> On 1/1/2013 1:54 PM, Leon wrote:
>
>>
>> Two things
>>
>> 1. Her gay-rar obviously is not working and
>>
>> 2. Her make-up artist is worth every penny he charged her. You should see
>> her with out.
>>
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=kathy+griffin&hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=az7jUJiXO4fC2wWDtIH4CA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=768&bih=928#biv=i|0;d|PEew5NyVGSpIHM:
>
>
> One thing, Leon... You obviously didn't look hard enough. In your link
> she looks world class, try this one:
>
> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/kathy-griffin-without-makeup-photos_n_1901161.html>
>
> Enough to gag a maggot.
>
Is that a mustache I see?
--
GWRoss
On 1/1/2013 9:27 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:10:31 -0800, Zz Yzx <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Now, if SNL does the EXACT same bit, it'll be WAY funny. Go figure.
>
> Nah, SNL hasn't been funny for at least 20 years now.
+1
--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://plus.google.com/114902129577517371552/posts
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 1/1/2013 10:35 PM, John Grossbohlin wrote:
>>
>> "Ed Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:10:31 -0800, Zz Yzx <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, if SNL does the EXACT same bit, it'll be WAY funny. Go figure.
>>>
>>> Nah, SNL hasn't been funny for at least 20 years now.
>>
>> Closer to 25+.... Once the original cast was gone... I'm sure it was
>> just the cast changes that made the difference.... it couldn't possibly
>> be due to my maturation and my not hanging out in college town bars
>> watching the show on the big projection TVs... ;~)
>
> Easy to check out: Watch 'em again on YouTube (they're all there) ... if
> they're still funny to you, so much for your maturation theory. :)
>
> BTW, to me, they are still funny ... particularly John Belushi, Gilda
> "Roseanne Rosanadana" Radnor, and Jane Curtain: "Well, Jane, it just goes
> to show you, it's always something; if it ain't one thing, it's another."
> :)
The one line that stuck with me was Dan's "Jane, you ignorant slut... "
Steve Martin didn't hurt 'em either...
Re the maturation thing. Back when Tommy the movie came out we all thought
it was great. I caught it a few years ago and couldn't stand to watch but a
few minutes of it! LOL
John
>> 1. Kathy Griffith peristently trying to give Anderson Cooper a hummer
>>
>> on national television after the New Years Eve Ball drop.
>> (At least feighning it; still, it was pretty odd, and went on and
>> on).
>
>Yeah - I posted a comment about this on another group. CNN wants us to think they are the most reputable of the news stations. Yet they allow one of their ace newsmen to be seen with her in this situation for two years in a row! Last year she ended in her bra during the same moment, exactly when CNN analyst David Gergen called Anderson to wish him happy new year. This year it just went on and on. I suspect some folks tuned in thinking it was going to be family-rated entertainment - cover the kids eyes!!
>
>Apparently Cooper and Griffith are friends. But as an openly gay, but conservative, news personality he really doesn't need this kind of exposure. I can't imagine what CNN management is thinking.
>
>RonB
Well, for whatever reason Mr. Cooper wudn't diggin' it at all. And it
wasn't funny.
Now, if SNL does the EXACT same bit, it'll be WAY funny. Go figure.
On 1/1/2013 10:35 PM, John Grossbohlin wrote:
>
> "Ed Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:10:31 -0800, Zz Yzx <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Now, if SNL does the EXACT same bit, it'll be WAY funny. Go figure.
>>
>> Nah, SNL hasn't been funny for at least 20 years now.
>
> Closer to 25+.... Once the original cast was gone... I'm sure it was
> just the cast changes that made the difference.... it couldn't possibly
> be due to my maturation and my not hanging out in college town bars
> watching the show on the big projection TVs... ;~)
Easy to check out: Watch 'em again on YouTube (they're all there) ... if
they're still funny to you, so much for your maturation theory. :)
BTW, to me, they are still funny ... particularly John Belushi, Gilda
"Roseanne Rosanadana" Radnor, and Jane Curtain: "Well, Jane, it just
goes to show you, it's always something; if it ain't one thing, it's
another." :)
--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://plus.google.com/114902129577517371552/posts
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)
On 1/2/2013 8:43 AM, RonB wrote:
> Wow - she needs to get her face pulled back a little more. Pretty soon here ears will be in the back of her head.
So that's not a goatee??
--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://plus.google.com/114902129577517371552/posts
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:57:23 -0500, tiredofspam <nospam.nospam.com>
wrote:
>On 1/1/2013 12:52 AM, Zz Yzx wrote:
>> 1. Kathy Griffith peristently trying to give Anderson Cooper a hummer
>> on national television after the New Years Eve Ball drop.
>>
>> (At least feighning it; still, it was pretty odd, and went on and
>> on).
>>
>Obviously she needs the ratings and will do anything.
>She must be at the bottom of her career and desperate.
She's been at the bottom of her career her whole career. That's all
she does. Like fart jokes, I suppose it's funny the first time you
see it as an adolescent. OTOH, Blazing Saddles *was* funny
(particularly when they showed it on network TV, without the sound
track).
On 1/2/2013 7:50 AM, Unquestionably Confused wrote:
> On 1/1/2013 1:54 PM, Leon wrote:
>
>>
>> Two things
>>
>> 1. Her gay-rar obviously is not working and
>>
>> 2. Her make-up artist is worth every penny he charged her. You should
>> see
>> her with out.
>>
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=kathy+griffin&hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=az7jUJiXO4fC2wWDtIH4CA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=768&bih=928#biv=i|0;d|PEew5NyVGSpIHM:
>>
>
>
> One thing, Leon... You obviously didn't look hard enough. In your link
> she looks world class, try this one:
>
> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/kathy-griffin-without-makeup-photos_n_1901161.html>
>
>
> Enough to gag a maggot.
>
Actually that is the one that I referred to. Oddly the link worked
correctly on my iPad.
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:52:46 -0800, Zz Yzx <[email protected]>
wrote:
>1. Kathy Griffith peristently trying to give Anderson Cooper a hummer
>on national television after the New Years Eve Ball drop.
>
> (At least feighning it; still, it was pretty odd, and went on and
>on).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBRwXroFwUg
On 1/1/2013 12:52 AM, Zz Yzx wrote:
> 1. Kathy Griffith peristently trying to give Anderson Cooper a hummer
> on national television after the New Years Eve Ball drop.
>
> (At least feighning it; still, it was pretty odd, and went on and
> on).
>
Obviously she needs the ratings and will do anything.
She must be at the bottom of her career and desperate.