TW

Tom Watson

22/11/2003 9:26 PM

Is Usnet Dying?

I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."

My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
as though they couldn't be bothered.

This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
condition.

When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
active groups.

Why this attitude by the ISP's?

I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
but is often down.

However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
their system does not pick up the posts.

I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
on Google.

What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?


Regards, Tom
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson


This topic has 227 replies

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 12:27 AM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 00:00:27 GMT, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:


>
>It was last time I looked, but you better be prepared to read/write Russian.

nyet shitski?

(well, that's damned disappointing)




Regards, Tom
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 1:20 AM

[email protected] wrote:

> Yep voice controlled games over 20 years ago.

Did it work any better than the thing for my CoCo? I remember going through
the trainer.

Bah-LOO <flashes orange>
Bah-LOO <flashes red>
Bah-LOO <flashes purple>
Bah-LOO <flashes blue>
Bah-LOO <flashes blue>
Bah-LOO <flashes orange>


--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

WS

"Wayne SIKORSKI"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 5:15 PM


> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> as though they couldn't be bothered.
>
> This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
> subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
> condition.
>
> When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
> active groups.
>
> Why this attitude by the ISP's?
>
> I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
> ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
> but is often down.
>
> However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
> when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
> their system does not pick up the posts.
>

Hi Tom,

The "Techs" from SNiP have said the same thing to me many times, I am one of
the "few" usenet users on their system.

The Voicenet server seems to be working better than when they attempted to
host their own servers. I currently use a free news server out of Berlin,
Germany. They are strictly a text server and do not carry binary newsgroups.
http://news.cis.dfn.de/

Wayne

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 10:26 PM

George M. Kazaka wrote:

> When I came on here i actually joined a woodwork listserv, I was getting
> all the e-mails from this group but when i posted no one got them, I never
> found out where they went
> I still do not understand how this newsgroup goes to the listserv but it
> is based in Indianna.

You were getting *posts* from this group. Slight difference.

It's pretty common for it to run the other way. There's a linux kernel
newsgroup that echoes the contents of the mailing list, but posts to the
newsgroup do not go to the list. What you're seeing is the same thing in
reverse. They doubtless set it up that way on purpose, and nothing is
broken.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 3:24 PM

There goes that old "perspective" again. There was something very satisfying
in one of the old text based Adventure games, where the graphics were in
_your_ mind and imagination, instead of the incessant on-screen flash, whiz,
bang, of the ADD generation(s).

Of course, a prerequisite to enjoyment was a mind richly prepared by reading
and education, a commodity currently in short supply.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03


"George" wrote in message

> The answer, as I see it, is the demographic with the money to spend, and
the
> place where you can put advertising are the winners, a bunch of old BBS
and
> FidoFolks are soon to be losers. The trend favors the Napster-type format
> or the forums like Woodcentral, where the ads flow freely.
>
> You think any of the kids understand the Windows modem icon? I remember
my
> 300 had the top molded to mate comfortably with a standard desk set, as
> pictured. None of the kids I asked had any idea that telephones used to
> connect in line with modems, or that there were handset types with
receiver
> cups. Probably antiques for sale on e-bay.
>
> Come to think of it, I think I may still have that UDS 300 downstairs....

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 7:04 PM

The first Adventure game I saw was even before the TI-994A, on a mainframe
in college, so the TI 99/4a added fuel to a fire that was already burning:

"You are on a beach as the sun rises to light the day. To your North, along
the water's edge as the morning tide recedes, is what appears to be the
mouth of a cave . At your feet is a bag of flares, an axe, a map, and a
knife. You can only carry three of these items. Grab axe ... "Can't 'grab'".
Take axe. To the South is a ......."

I sold my 99/4a for $250 at a garage sale in the late 80's, including the GE
Cassette "hard drive". It was fully functional. May regret doing that one of
these days. Learned the intricacies of assembly language, and Introduced my
first daughter to the computing world with the kid's OS, "Turtle".

... how time flies. Time to start using a calendar instead of a watch.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03

<[email protected]> wrote in message
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:49:10 GMT, wrote:
>
> >Or 'Pirates', on the TI ... before the PC came along.
>
> I still have my original TI-99/4a and almost every piece of software ever
> issued for it, EXCEPT the Milton Bradley EU that allowed voice controlled
> games.
> Yep voice controlled games over 20 years ago.

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 2:44 PM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 14:39:21 -0800, [email protected] wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:15:45 -0500, "Wayne SIKORSKI" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>The "Techs" from SNiP have said the same thing to me many times, I am one of
>>the "few" usenet users on their system.
>>
>>The Voicenet server seems to be working better than when they attempted to
>>host their own servers. I currently use a free news server out of Berlin,
>>Germany. They are strictly a text server and do not carry binary newsgroups.
>>http://news.cis.dfn.de/
>>
>Free binary server right here.
>All the free porn downloads you want.<g>
>http://www.readfreenews.net/biggulp-faq.html

PL

Philip Lewis

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 11:14 PM

Tom Watson <[email protected]> writes:
>nyet shitski?
Privyet!

ne-poonimiu po russki. A Bac?
--
paka!
flip
Verso l'esterno! Verso l'esterno! Deamons di ignoranza.
Remove origin of the word spam from address to reply (leave "+")

ee

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 10:32 AM

Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> as though they couldn't be bothered.

I think so many newsgroups have been taken over by spammers and
hatemongers, it's tough to waste so much time wading through the muck.
This newsgroup has been better than average but there are dozens of
others that have succumbed. Everywhere you go, it's porn, spam, get
rich quick schemes, JUNK. It's not hard to understand why users have
been leaving in droves.

There are serious implications if this continues in the trend
direction. Not one newsgroup in my memory has ever recovered once it
was thoroughly spammed for more than a month or two. Some newsgroups
have been taken over by the folks who spammed it to death. Maybe
that's cheaper than starting up a new group.

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 12:00 AM


"Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:49:58 GMT, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:

> (i thought fidonet was still extant)

It was last time I looked, but you better be prepared to read/write Russian.


--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03

DW

"Doug Winterburn"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 4:12 AM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:04:11 -0500, Silvan wrote:


> Not fool-proof, but the best way I've found is to have multiple upstream
> servers. I'm not sure how you might go about doing that without running
> your own news spool, but you can run your own spool even on Windows.
> Something called Hamster I think. I know little about it, other than it's
> "the closest thing to Leafnode Windows has."

If your into a slight bit of hacking, google up "dnntpd".

-Doug

Nn

Nova

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 10:29 PM

Tom Watson wrote:

> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> as though they couldn't be bothered.

<snip>

My next door neighbor works "network tech support" (internal to the
company) for Adelphia Cable. Prior to me showing him what "UseNet" was,
he didn't even know it existed. I suspect it is the same with many of the
"kids" working for various ISP's.

--
Jack Novak
Buffalo, NY - USA
(Remove "SPAM" from email address to reply)

d

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:51 PM

David Babcock wrote:
> Unfortunately the first response is pretty valid. Having been in the IT
> field for over 25 years and having worked for a few ISP's, I can say most
> ISP's don't want to expend the capital to support a small client base. The
> younger people, and a lot of uniformed people use chat rooms for similar
> information sharing (among other uses) Guess we're just dinosaurs........and
> I remember dialing into a BBS (bulletin board service) ........so there
> won't be any guessing what BBS means!

My first computer/modem was a Monroe 220 with a 110 coupler doing a
timeshare with Great Lakes Naval. Or an old Morrow if you want to talk
PCs that were store bought not homebrew. As for BBSs I ran RBBS and
Wildcat, the others were too clunky to be fun. And now my wife
complains when her T-1 is slow. How times change.

Dave in Fairfax
--
reply-to doesn't work
use:
daveldr at att dot net

Gs

"George"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 8:24 AM

Spoken like an urban type. For some, there is a single choice. Or pay
distance charges.

The answer, as I see it, is the demographic with the money to spend, and the
place where you can put advertising are the winners, a bunch of old BBS and
FidoFolks are soon to be losers. The trend favors the Napster-type format
or the forums like Woodcentral, where the ads flow freely.

You think any of the kids understand the Windows modem icon? I remember my
300 had the top molded to mate comfortably with a standard desk set, as
pictured. None of the kids I asked had any idea that telephones used to
connect in line with modems, or that there were handset types with receiver
cups. Probably antiques for sale on e-bay.

Come to think of it, I think I may still have that UDS 300 downstairs....

"Silvan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Larry Jaques wrote:
>
> > Switch ISPs, then stick with a good one.
>
> I'll agree to that last point in particular. I've seen'em come, and I've
> seen'em go. Dad changes ISPs more often than I change shoes, always
trying
> to find the best deal. I've had the same ISP for 10 years.
>
> One reason I haven't taken the plunge into cable is because I'd not only
be
> paying way more than seems reasonable, but I'd also be trading my dead
> reliable local provider for a big name conglomerate that isn't even sure
if
> it will ever emerge from bankruptcy.
>


Gs

"George"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:43 PM

No, I mean kids. The high-schoolers who, according to popular notions have
to teach their elders how to use technology, but in reality know only GUIs,
and in some cases don't even realize that the toolbars are common across
many programs, but instead keep bashing about, locking up machines.

As to e-bay, wait until I try to peddle Motorola's former pride(300/1200),
and I'll let you know....

"Silvan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> George wrote:
>
> > You think any of the kids understand the Windows modem icon? I remember
> > my 300 had the top molded to mate comfortably with a standard desk set,
as
>
> Sounds like you'd lump me in with the "kids." So yes, I do. We had one
of
> those things when I was a wee lad, but I never used it for much. When I
> got into BBSing in about middle school, it was via a PC with an internal
> 1200 baud modem. Dad used the 300 baud acoustic coupler deal for work,
> from a Heathkit dumb terminal.
>
> He might still have it. Should I try to sell it on eBay? :)

Ba

B a r r y B u r k e J r .

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 7:36 PM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:29:29 GMT, Nova <[email protected]>
wrote:

>My next door neighbor works "network tech support" (internal to the
>company) for Adelphia Cable. Prior to me showing him what "UseNet" was,
>he didn't even know it existed. I suspect it is the same with many of the
>"kids" working for various ISP's.

I'd agree with that.

I was an admin for a large, phone company owned, ISP from 1996-2000.
Back then, I was one of the few employees that actually used Usenet.

Our official policy was that it was not an advertised or premium
service. Very little money and effort was put forth on Usenet, and
our help desk probably didn't know what it was.

Barry

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:19 AM

Keith Carlson wrote:

> I wonder how many don't care for web forums? One big advantage would be to

I hate web forums. For one thing, you have to either type in an editor and
then copy/paste onto the form, or else use the crappy editor built into the
form. That's probably my #1 reason for hating all such things web-based.

> have a moderated forum. Be able to block random posters by requiring
> registration, and being able to step in when a thread gets out of hand.

> Hard to see how a woodworking group needs that freedom of expression,
> though.

I'm sure there's probably a moderated woodworking forum out there somewhere
if you really want one.

Personally, I hate moderation. I wouldn't live in a gated community, or one
where there was a homeowner's association either. One of my neighbors lets
his grass grow so high he has to bush hog it every second year, but so the
hell what? I don't get to tell him to mow it, and he doesn't get to tell
me what color I can paint my shed, or how large my mailbox is allowed to
be. Suits me just fine.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 12:47 AM

Larry Jaques wrote:

> Switch ISPs, then stick with a good one.

I'll agree to that last point in particular. I've seen'em come, and I've
seen'em go. Dad changes ISPs more often than I change shoes, always trying
to find the best deal. I've had the same ISP for 10 years.

One reason I haven't taken the plunge into cable is because I'd not only be
paying way more than seems reasonable, but I'd also be trading my dead
reliable local provider for a big name conglomerate that isn't even sure if
it will ever emerge from bankruptcy.

Hell, I do banking the same way. My bank doesn't do ATMs or debit cards or
any of that other fancy shit, but I've been dealing with the same bank for
15 years. Just about every other bank in town has been bought by some
national conglomerate in that time.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

bR

[email protected] (Robert Bonomi)

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

26/11/2003 3:54 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
Michael Daly <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 25-Nov-2003, [email protected] (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>
>> The full feed is probably only about 600 *GIGABYTES* of traffic _per_day_.
>
>I distinctly remember when a local sysop was complaining that if Usenet
>continued to grow, he'd have to upgrade to a 20MB drive to contain it.
>That was an $800 upgrade for a clone!

I go back to the days when you could get a 'full feed' over a 19.2kbit/sec
dial-up modem -- in about 3 hrs. When it was possible to 'eyeball' _every_
article. And there were people who _did_ exactly that.

Cc

"CW"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:36 AM

How much of that was porn?


"Bay Area Dave" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> There were approximately 11 MILLION messages posted in the last 30 days.
> How does that square with your ISP's comments? IT DOESN'T!! Perhaps
> they are shirking their duties as "providers" with less than stellar
> support of the NG's.
>
> dave
>
> Tom Watson wrote:
>
> > I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> > that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
> >
> > My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> > complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> > their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> > as though they couldn't be bothered.
> >
> > This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
> > subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
> > condition.
> >
> > When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
> > active groups.
> >
> > Why this attitude by the ISP's?
> >
> > I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
> > ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
> > but is often down.
> >
> > However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
> > when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
> > their system does not pick up the posts.
> >
> > I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
> > of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
> > on Google.
> >
> > What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
> > claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
> > what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
> >
> >
> > Regards, Tom
> > Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
> > Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
> > http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson
>

ss

"solarman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 9:19 PM
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Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 6:40 PM

[email protected] wrote:

> Usenet customers are generally heavy bandwidth users as well.

Why, snarfing porn?

I'm a very low bandwidth customer as far as usenet goes. Connect for 20
minutes, download all my articles, hang up. If it weren't for my running
Debian and updating it all by modem periodically, my ISP would love me. (A
big update takes about 36 hours of continuous downloading... I'm patient
enough to put up with it though, and it's a damn sight cheaper than cable.)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 2:31 PM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 03:51:48 GMT, Larry Jaques <jake@di\/ersify.com>
wrote:


>That's absolutely false. Hell, you _alone_ have responded to
>at least 50 trolls on this group this month. Your 1/2 dozen
>troll-responding buddies did the same. <glare>

Why would anyone ask for a moderated forum when we have you, Larry?


Regards, Tom
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 5:49 PM

Or 'Pirates', on the TI ... before the PC came along.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03

"solarman" wrote in message
> Like Tradewars? I spent way too many hours playing that one...

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:54 AM

coda:

and the 2600 boyz was pissin inta da phone lines wid der chirpers

and The Well was both deep and had sweet water

and a Compuserve addy actually meant something

and trolls was more sophisticated - because they had ta be



Regards, Tom
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 3:15 AM

That's him ... one sharp dude.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03

"Tom Watson" wrote in message

> Jack Rickard?

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 11:49 PM

Who was the guy (editor) that ran Bulletin Board magazine? That was one
sharp dude, IIRC ... I would've written him in for President in the last few
elections if I could just remember his name.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03



"solarman" wrote in message
> Sounds like what happened to Fidonet and all the other small BBS related
networks when the Internet got very popular... Net133 here in Atlanta at
one time was the second largest Fidonet net in the world. Today I really
doubt there are 15 BBS's in the whole state.
>
> Ahhhhh those were the good old days....

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:43 AM

CW wrote:

> You got lucky with the bank. I've been with one for 23 years. They've
> changed names 4 times.

I guess they're not big enough to be attractive to any of the mega corps.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 12:25 PM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 20:07:48 GMT, Phisherman <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 23 Nov 2003 10:32:38 -0800, [email protected] (edfan) wrote:
>
>>Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
>>> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
>>> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>>>
>>> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
>>> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
>>> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
>>> as though they couldn't be bothered.
>>
>>I think so many newsgroups have been taken over by spammers and
>>hatemongers, it's tough to waste so much time wading through the muck.
>>This newsgroup has been better than average but there are dozens of
>>others that have succumbed. Everywhere you go, it's porn, spam, get
>>rich quick schemes, JUNK. It's not hard to understand why users have
>>been leaving in droves.
>>
>>There are serious implications if this continues in the trend
>>direction. Not one newsgroup in my memory has ever recovered once it
>>was thoroughly spammed for more than a month or two. Some newsgroups
>>have been taken over by the folks who spammed it to death. Maybe
>>that's cheaper than starting up a new group.
>
>
>Actually Internet use is on the decline due to all the annoyances,
>ads, vermit and such. But the internet is certainly here to stay.

At least usenet is still useful for freebies.
Try find clipart on the net.
Most websites that claim to have free clipart are more likely to lockup your
computer with popup ads then deliver the goods.
But the usenet binary clipart group is still going strong.

I've been a part of some usenet groups for so long I consider them family.
Sure you get the occasional bad cousin, but all families have those.
I have an aunt in real life I would just love to 'Plonk'.<g>

BH

Brian Henderson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

26/11/2003 1:02 AM

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:03:43 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:

>That's not really true. Back before the doors were opened to the public at
>large, spammers got kicked off the net after just one or two
>transgressions. When the net was purely for academic purposes, anything
>smacking of commercialism was dealt with swiftly, and with a very heavy
>hand. We hadn't even invented the term "spam" yet, I don't think. No one
>had ever seen a top post either.

Since the net has been open to the general public then. You're right,
when I first got access to Usenet back in '86, it wasn't like this,
but there weren't that many of us out there either. Far too many
people point to the 'good old days' just a couple years ago and seem
to have very selective memories.

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 10:14 AM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:43:49 GMT, "Ken Vaughn" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>"Nova" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> <snip>
>>
>> My next door neighbor works "network tech support" (internal to the
>> company) for Adelphia Cable. Prior to me showing him what "UseNet" was,
>> he didn't even know it existed. I suspect it is the same with many of the
>> "kids" working for various ISP's.
>>
>
>Boy, does that sound familiar. I have used 5 or 6 ISP's in as many years,
>and I have frequently had to tell customer support what USENET was. The
>better ISP's use more than one news feed, which helps with the missing posts
>problem. I have frequently complained about Earthlink newsgroup service,
>but in all fairness I have seen a dramatic improvement since they
>implemented new servers and split their subscriber base into two groups,
>East and West. Message retention seems to be longer, as well.
>
>I do believe that the number of ISP subscribers which use USENET is low,
>probably less than 5%, maybe even less.

For most ISPs it is FAR less than 5% and declining.
At it's peak Usenet use never reached more than 10% since the arrival of
the 'Internet'.

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 6:36 PM

[email protected] wrote:

> Shut off your firewall and popup killers and see what happens to the great
> unwashed when they are foolish enough to attempt to find free clipart via
> the web.

It would be annoying, but it *still* wouldn't crash my computer. :)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 11:47 PM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:40:39 -0500, "solarman"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>It HAS made some advances since the 2400's day... I still have my old satellite feed from Planet Connect but they no longer offer the old service anymore... 2.4Ghz was pretty quick back in 1989 too! Almost makes me want to setup the old Intermail/Proboard combo again... <grin>

'Tis true, solarman, that there have been advances but, I hearken back
to the brave days, when modems were modems, and interfaced directally
with the handset - Ah, the roar of the handshake, the smell of the
download!

(when a single graphics file sat on the phone line overnight)

Yeehaa!



Regards, Tom
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 1:14 AM

Larry Jaques wrote:

> files. Hell, I remember back when an operating system
> fit on a single-sided 5-1/4" floppy. (Dad's Kaypro w/ CPM)
> Ask your kids about those for a laugh. ;)

A friend had a Kaypro. One of those "almost" compatibles, right?

I still have a 5.25" floppy drive around here somewhere.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

24/11/2003 10:36 AM

Silvan asks:

>A friend had a Kaypro. One of those "almost" compatibles, right?

No. cp/m was not intended as a compatible. It was there first, meant to become
the big dog on the block, and using it almost cost KayPro its shirt, which it
later lost anyway, IIRC.

That portable cp/m machine was a delight. And weigh 22 pounds. Keyboard snap
latched to the 7" screen/case/cpu. Green screen. IIRC, you also had a choice of
amber, but at extra cost. I went for green. The package, with a Juki ball head
printer, cost me almost $2400 (Colonial Computers, Salem).

Charlie Self

"Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog. Few people are interested and the
frog dies of it." E. B. White

















Pp

Philski

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

25/11/2003 8:54 PM

And to think, Digital Research was first approached by IBM for a new
operating system and because they thought IBM would be like the Borg,
they ended up turning it down - enter then Microsoft and the rest is
history....

But I do not miss having to use a boot disk for getting my old Northstar
up and running...

Philski

Charlie Self wrote:
>
> Silvan asks:
>
> >A friend had a Kaypro. One of those "almost" compatibles, right?
>
> No. cp/m was not intended as a compatible. It was there first, meant to become
> the big dog on the block, and using it almost cost KayPro its shirt, which it
> later lost anyway, IIRC.
>
> That portable cp/m machine was a delight. And weigh 22 pounds. Keyboard snap
> latched to the 7" screen/case/cpu. Green screen. IIRC, you also had a choice of
> amber, but at extra cost. I went for green. The package, with a Juki ball head
> printer, cost me almost $2400 (Colonial Computers, Salem).
>
> Charlie Self
>
> "Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog. Few people are interested and the
> frog dies of it." E. B. White
>
>
>
>

mm

"mrdancer"

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

26/11/2003 5:49 PM

"Robert Bonomi" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> mrdancer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >"Philski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> And to think, Digital Research was first approached by IBM for a new
> >> operating system and because they thought IBM would be like the Borg,
> >> they ended up turning it down - enter then Microsoft and the rest is
> >> history....
> >
> >The story I heard was that the Digital Research CEO was on a plane
heading
> >for vacation, and couldn't be bothered with IBM (DR thought they were the
> >only software game in town). That's when IBM got in touch with Bill
Gates.
> >Gates promised an operating system (OS) on a very short timeline and IBM
> >jumped on it. However, Gates wanted to maintain the rights to the OS.
IBM
> >said "sure", not realizing the power that that one little decision would
> >provide in creating the MicroSoft monopoly.
> >
> >Anywayz, Gates quickly cobbled together the OS and dubbed it QDOS (Quick
and
> >Dirty Operating System). Later, the Q was dropped and the acronym became
> >DOS (I used to think it meant "Disk Operating System"!).
>
> FALSE TO HISTORY.
>
> Gates *DID*NOT*BUILD*IT*. He _purchased_ rights to an _existing_ O/S,
called
> QDOS, from a company called "Seattle Computing". And the rest is history.

Arrgh! That's what I get for believing what I see on TV! :(

hD

[email protected] (David Hall)

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

25/11/2003 11:37 AM

Tim Douglass <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> On 24 Nov 2003 10:36:24 GMT, [email protected] (Charlie Self)
> wrote:
>
> >Silvan asks:
> >
> >>A friend had a Kaypro. One of those "almost" compatibles, right?
> >
> >No. cp/m was not intended as a compatible. It was there first, meant to become
> >the big dog on the block, and using it almost cost KayPro its shirt, which it
> >later lost anyway, IIRC.
> >
> >That portable cp/m machine was a delight. And weigh 22 pounds. Keyboard snap
> >latched to the 7" screen/case/cpu. Green screen. IIRC, you also had a choice of
> >amber, but at extra cost. I went for green. The package, with a Juki ball head
> >printer, cost me almost $2400 (Colonial Computers, Salem).
> >
>
> Ah, yes. Shades of my Osborne 1. Still stored around here somewhere. I
> wonder if the floppy disks will still read after 10 years or so.
>
> Tim Douglass
>
> http://www.DouglassClan.com

I remember the Osborne well. The first computer I ever used. Supercalc
( a CPM based forerunner to Lotus - Excel). Memory so small that a
simple depreciation schedule required 4 spreadsheets and macro
automation between them - got me a A in that Graduate Accounting
course though. It was a Portable - if portable meant breaking you arm
to lug it from one electric outlet to another.

Dave Hall

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to [email protected] (David Hall) on 25/11/2003 11:37 AM

25/11/2003 8:15 PM

Dave Hall writes:

>
>I remember the Osborne well. The first computer I ever used. Supercalc
>( a CPM based forerunner to Lotus - Excel). Memory so small that a
>simple depreciation schedule required 4 spreadsheets and macro
>automation between them - got me a A in that Graduate Accounting
>course though. It was a Portable - if portable meant breaking you arm
>to lug it from one electric outlet to another.
>

Yeah. I remember that now: forgot to add, you needed to plug the "portable" in.
I took my KayPro to the Hardware Show in Chi one year...I think my arm was 2"
longer before I got home.

Charlie Self

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would
promise them missionaries for dinner." H. L. Mencken


















bR

[email protected] (Robert Bonomi)

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

27/11/2003 2:48 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
Michael Daly <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 26-Nov-2003, [email protected] (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>
>> FALSE TO HISTORY.
>>
>> Gates *DID*NOT*BUILD*IT*. He _purchased_ rights to an _existing_ O/S, called
>> QDOS, from a company called "Seattle Computing". And the rest is history.
>
>Actually, there were three operating systems available for the IBM PC. However,
>two of them were sold for something like $300 a copy, whereas MS sold theirs for
>$50. Not sure if those numbers are right, but they're in that sort of ballpark.
>That's why everyone bought MS.
>
>The other two were DR DOS and CP/M-86 IIRC. Or maybe it was USCD... anyway,
>the myth that only MS had a product or had exclusivity is exactly that - a
>myth. MS won in the marketplace, not in the IBM boardrooms.

"Not Exactly". <grin>


From IBM, you could get the base box, with BASIC in ROM, or, _IF_ you shelled
out the big bucks for a floppy drive, you could get IBM's "PC-DOS" for a
moderate additional cost. At "day one", those were the -only- options.

CP/M-86 appeared on the scene a few months later, *NOT*SUPPORTED* by IBM,
but as a 'third party' product -- the CP/M people had to wait and buy a
'retail' machine, to have the 'porting platform' to work on. "Concurrent
CP/M 86" (multi-user) was also ported --soon after they got the 'base' system
out the door. There was also MP/M-86, a competing multi-user system, but
it didn't come along till some time later.

Gates had purchased _exlcusive_ marketing rights for a period of several
years from Seattle Computing.

MS then licensed it to IBM, with a fairly "short" period where it was
marketed exclusively under the IBM label. After that exclusive marketing
period expired, MS offered the product directly to customers under their
own label, as well as collecting royalties on every copy IBM sold.

About this point, the 'compatible' market started to develop -- with varying
degrees of compatibility to the 'genuine IBM' product. Oddly enough, IBM
would -not- license PC-DOS to the other hardware manufacturers. MS, on the
other hand, had no such reservations. And they were the "*only* other game
in town" as far as a low-cost O/S for the 8088 platform went.

And the war was on. IBM tried to hamstring the software it sold, so it
would run on *only* a genuine IBM manufactured machine, and the 3rd-party
manufacturers got better and better at being 'compatible' -- to the point
of being 'virtually indistinguishable'.

When the 'next generation' microprocessors came along -- the 80286, with
it's rudimentary 'protected mode', *large* address-space, and memory-
management, other, more powerful/sophisticated O/S options became available.
Including several early UNIX derivitives (e.g. Xenix and Venix), some
"looks like UNIX, but _not_ based on it (e.g. Chromix, Coherent), and
other 'specialized' systems (e.g. QNX, OS/2). All these products filled
"niche" markets, with MS-DOS being the 'de facto standard' for the 'typical'
single-user desktop system. There were several others systems as well, whose
names escape me at this remove. The "UCSD 'p-system'" deserves mention,
it was a 'laudable attempt' to *really* insulate the application from the
hardware it ran on. It defined a 'virtual machine', and implemented a
'simulator' for that machine. Applications were written in the 'pseudo-code'
for that 'virtual machine'. By simply implementing that simulator on any
specific platform, *regardless* of the actual processor used, you could
run *any* "p-system" application on that machine. It didn't matter whether
it was a "genuine IBM PC", a "clone", a "more-or-less compatible", or
something *totally* different, like a Motorola-68000 based box -- you could
copy the actual executable from one box to another, and *IT*WOULD*RUN*!

While the design was laudable, it suffered in execution. the 'virtual
machine' was, of necessity, implemented as an _interpreter_, with the
associated performance penalties. And, because it _was_ "hardware
independant", you only had a basic set of "generic" device capabilities
available. This put it at a *definite* "glitz" disadvantage, vs. anything
that 'took advantage' of 'device specific' capabilities on a particular
platform. Primarily for those reasons, it never reached 'critical mass',
to the point of being self-sustaining in the marketplace.

In the mean time, Seattle Computing had transformed itself into "Digital
Research", and after the 'exclusive' period of the license to MS expired,
offered their own 'compatible' verson of a Disk Operating Ssystem, based
on their 'original' QDOS (with enhancements to offer features comparable
to the then-current MS offering).

Unfortunately for them, MS had sewn up the 'brand recognition' issue, and
effectively 'owned' the low end single-user O/S market.


MR

Mark

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

26/11/2003 4:25 PM



Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> FALSE TO HISTORY.
>
> Gates *DID*NOT*BUILD*IT*. He _purchased_ rights to an _existing_ O/S, called
> QDOS, from a company called "Seattle Computing". And the rest is history.




And he bought it for $50,000




--

Mark

N.E. Ohio


Never argue with a fool, a bystander can't tell you apart. (S. Clemens,
A.K.A. Mark Twain)

When in doubt hit the throttle. It may not help but it sure ends the
suspense. (Gaz, r.moto)

mm

"mrdancer"

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

26/11/2003 3:19 PM

"Philski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> And to think, Digital Research was first approached by IBM for a new
> operating system and because they thought IBM would be like the Borg,
> they ended up turning it down - enter then Microsoft and the rest is
> history....

The story I heard was that the Digital Research CEO was on a plane heading
for vacation, and couldn't be bothered with IBM (DR thought they were the
only software game in town). That's when IBM got in touch with Bill Gates.
Gates promised an operating system (OS) on a very short timeline and IBM
jumped on it. However, Gates wanted to maintain the rights to the OS. IBM
said "sure", not realizing the power that that one little decision would
provide in creating the MicroSoft monopoly.

Anywayz, Gates quickly cobbled together the OS and dubbed it QDOS (Quick and
Dirty Operating System). Later, the Q was dropped and the acronym became
DOS (I used to think it meant "Disk Operating System"!).

DOS evolved into the Windows GUI. So, the basis of Windows was a quick and
dirty operating system. And folks wonder why Windows has so many
problems.... ;-)

Tt

Trent©

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

27/11/2003 9:08 PM

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:48:18 +0000, [email protected]
(Robert Bonomi) wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
>Michael Daly <[email protected]> wrote:
>>On 26-Nov-2003, [email protected] (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>>
>>> FALSE TO HISTORY.
>>>
>>> Gates *DID*NOT*BUILD*IT*. He _purchased_ rights to an _existing_ O/S, called
>>> QDOS, from a company called "Seattle Computing". And the rest is history.
>>
>>Actually, there were three operating systems available for the IBM PC. However,
>>two of them were sold for something like $300 a copy, whereas MS sold theirs for
>>$50. Not sure if those numbers are right, but they're in that sort of ballpark.
>>That's why everyone bought MS.
>>
>>The other two were DR DOS and CP/M-86 IIRC. Or maybe it was USCD... anyway,
>>the myth that only MS had a product or had exclusivity is exactly that - a
>>myth. MS won in the marketplace, not in the IBM boardrooms.
>
>"Not Exactly". <grin>
>
>
>From IBM, you could get the base box, with BASIC in ROM, or, _IF_ you shelled
>out the big bucks for a floppy drive, you could get IBM's "PC-DOS" for a
>moderate additional cost. At "day one", those were the -only- options.
>
>CP/M-86 appeared on the scene a few months later, *NOT*SUPPORTED* by IBM,
>but as a 'third party' product -- the CP/M people had to wait and buy a
>'retail' machine, to have the 'porting platform' to work on. "Concurrent
>CP/M 86" (multi-user) was also ported --soon after they got the 'base' system
>out the door. There was also MP/M-86, a competing multi-user system, but
>it didn't come along till some time later.
>
>Gates had purchased _exlcusive_ marketing rights for a period of several
>years from Seattle Computing.
>
>MS then licensed it to IBM, with a fairly "short" period where it was
>marketed exclusively under the IBM label. After that exclusive marketing
>period expired, MS offered the product directly to customers under their
>own label, as well as collecting royalties on every copy IBM sold.
>
>About this point, the 'compatible' market started to develop -- with varying
>degrees of compatibility to the 'genuine IBM' product. Oddly enough, IBM
>would -not- license PC-DOS to the other hardware manufacturers. MS, on the
>other hand, had no such reservations. And they were the "*only* other game
>in town" as far as a low-cost O/S for the 8088 platform went.
>
>And the war was on. IBM tried to hamstring the software it sold, so it
>would run on *only* a genuine IBM manufactured machine, and the 3rd-party
>manufacturers got better and better at being 'compatible' -- to the point
>of being 'virtually indistinguishable'.
>
>When the 'next generation' microprocessors came along -- the 80286, with
>it's rudimentary 'protected mode', *large* address-space, and memory-
>management, other, more powerful/sophisticated O/S options became available.
>Including several early UNIX derivitives (e.g. Xenix and Venix), some
>"looks like UNIX, but _not_ based on it (e.g. Chromix, Coherent), and
>other 'specialized' systems (e.g. QNX, OS/2). All these products filled
>"niche" markets, with MS-DOS being the 'de facto standard' for the 'typical'
>single-user desktop system. There were several others systems as well, whose
>names escape me at this remove. The "UCSD 'p-system'" deserves mention,
>it was a 'laudable attempt' to *really* insulate the application from the
>hardware it ran on. It defined a 'virtual machine', and implemented a
>'simulator' for that machine. Applications were written in the 'pseudo-code'
>for that 'virtual machine'. By simply implementing that simulator on any
>specific platform, *regardless* of the actual processor used, you could
>run *any* "p-system" application on that machine. It didn't matter whether
>it was a "genuine IBM PC", a "clone", a "more-or-less compatible", or
>something *totally* different, like a Motorola-68000 based box -- you could
>copy the actual executable from one box to another, and *IT*WOULD*RUN*!
>
>While the design was laudable, it suffered in execution. the 'virtual
>machine' was, of necessity, implemented as an _interpreter_, with the
>associated performance penalties. And, because it _was_ "hardware
>independant", you only had a basic set of "generic" device capabilities
>available. This put it at a *definite* "glitz" disadvantage, vs. anything
>that 'took advantage' of 'device specific' capabilities on a particular
>platform. Primarily for those reasons, it never reached 'critical mass',
>to the point of being self-sustaining in the marketplace.
>
>In the mean time, Seattle Computing had transformed itself into "Digital
>Research", and after the 'exclusive' period of the license to MS expired,
>offered their own 'compatible' verson of a Disk Operating Ssystem, based
>on their 'original' QDOS (with enhancements to offer features comparable
>to the then-current MS offering).
>
>Unfortunately for them, MS had sewn up the 'brand recognition' issue, and
>effectively 'owned' the low end single-user O/S market.

Nice post, Bob...thanks.



Wishing you and yours a happy Thanksgiving season...

Trent

LB

Larry Blanchard

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

26/11/2003 9:07 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> There was a 4-5 part series on PBS a few years ago...gave the whole
> history of the computer. I taped the entire series...but haven't
> watched it for awhile.
>
Since I was around in time to program Univac, I've given up on watching
"histories" concocted by those who were never there. I get too irritated
:-).

Come to think of it, it's not only computer history that gets mangled.

--
Where ARE those Iraqi WMDs?

bR

[email protected] (Robert Bonomi)

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

26/11/2003 3:59 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
mrdancer <[email protected]> wrote:
>"Philski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> And to think, Digital Research was first approached by IBM for a new
>> operating system and because they thought IBM would be like the Borg,
>> they ended up turning it down - enter then Microsoft and the rest is
>> history....
>
>The story I heard was that the Digital Research CEO was on a plane heading
>for vacation, and couldn't be bothered with IBM (DR thought they were the
>only software game in town). That's when IBM got in touch with Bill Gates.
>Gates promised an operating system (OS) on a very short timeline and IBM
>jumped on it. However, Gates wanted to maintain the rights to the OS. IBM
>said "sure", not realizing the power that that one little decision would
>provide in creating the MicroSoft monopoly.
>
>Anywayz, Gates quickly cobbled together the OS and dubbed it QDOS (Quick and
>Dirty Operating System). Later, the Q was dropped and the acronym became
>DOS (I used to think it meant "Disk Operating System"!).

FALSE TO HISTORY.

Gates *DID*NOT*BUILD*IT*. He _purchased_ rights to an _existing_ O/S, called
QDOS, from a company called "Seattle Computing". And the rest is history.

>
>DOS evolved into the Windows GUI. So, the basis of Windows was a quick and
>dirty operating system. And folks wonder why Windows has so many
>problems.... ;-)
>
>

MD

"Michael Daly"

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

26/11/2003 7:20 PM

On 26-Nov-2003, [email protected] (Robert Bonomi) wrote:

> FALSE TO HISTORY.
>
> Gates *DID*NOT*BUILD*IT*. He _purchased_ rights to an _existing_ O/S, called
> QDOS, from a company called "Seattle Computing". And the rest is history.

Actually, there were three operating systems available for the IBM PC. However,
two of them were sold for something like $300 a copy, whereas MS sold theirs for
$50. Not sure if those numbers are right, but they're in that sort of ballpark.
That's why everyone bought MS.

The other two were DR DOS and CP/M-86 IIRC. Or maybe it was USCD... anyway,
the myth that only MS had a product or had exclusivity is exactly that - a
myth. MS won in the marketplace, not in the IBM boardrooms.

Mike

PS - MS didn't build much - they also bought Word and, ummm, Excel(?). Word
definitely.

Tt

Trent©

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

26/11/2003 11:27 PM

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:49:51 GMT, "mrdancer" <[email protected]>
wrote:


>Arrgh! That's what I get for believing what I see on TV! :(
>

There was a 4-5 part series on PBS a few years ago...gave the whole
history of the computer. I taped the entire series...but haven't
watched it for awhile.



Wishing you and yours a happy Thanksgiving season...

Trent

BM

Bob McConnell

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

27/11/2003 12:58 AM

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:20:49 GMT, "Michael Daly"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On 26-Nov-2003, [email protected] (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>
>> FALSE TO HISTORY.
>>
>> Gates *DID*NOT*BUILD*IT*. He _purchased_ rights to an _existing_ O/S, called
>> QDOS, from a company called "Seattle Computing". And the rest is history.
>
>Actually, there were three operating systems available for the IBM PC. However,
>two of them were sold for something like $300 a copy, whereas MS sold theirs for
>$50. Not sure if those numbers are right, but they're in that sort of ballpark.
>That's why everyone bought MS.
>
>The other two were DR DOS and CP/M-86 IIRC. Or maybe it was USCD... anyway,
>the myth that only MS had a product or had exclusivity is exactly that - a
>myth. MS won in the marketplace, not in the IBM boardrooms.
>
>Mike
>
>PS - MS didn't build much - they also bought Word and, ummm, Excel(?). Word
>definitely.

It has been a while, but if memory serves, in the first year, MS-DOS
1.0 was US$35.00, CP/M-86 was US$175.00 and CCP/M was US$225.00. When
MS-DOS 2.0 came out, it listed for US$45.00, but by then, the other
two were almost extinct. I was working on what eventually became the
NCR PC-4, and we had to test all three on it, along with the standard
set of programs. So we had to have three copies each of WordStar,
CalcStar, DataStar, and a couple of others.

Bob McConnell
N2SPP

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Bob McConnell on 27/11/2003 12:58 AM

27/11/2003 2:26 AM

Bob McConnell responds:

>MS-DOS 2.0 came out, it listed for US$45.00, but by then, the other
>two were almost extinct. I was working on what eventually became the
>NCR PC-4, and we had to test all three on it, along with the standard
>set of programs. So we had to have three copies each of WordStar,
>CalcStar, DataStar, and a couple of others.
>

I had almost--thankfully--forgotten WordStar's command structure..start the
sentence with a dot (.) and a number to do certain things. Amazing what 20
years can chew up in memory. And trying to do mail merges was such a joy...but
it did beat re-typing the addresses, if not by a whole lot.

As a writer, I found the ability to go back and erase or change half a page so
that pagination changed a real marvel. The program took care of it. When typing
a ms., you had to go back to that point, re-type and then re-type ever blinking
page (my editors got used to a lot of crossed out words, additions on rubber
cemented sheets and so forth).


Charlie Self

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would
promise them missionaries for dinner." H. L. Mencken


















LZ

Luigi Zanasi

in reply to Bob McConnell on 27/11/2003 12:58 AM

27/11/2003 7:47 AM

On 27 Nov 2003 02:26:40 GMT, [email protected] (Charlie Self)
reminisced:

>I had almost--thankfully--forgotten WordStar's command structure..start the
>sentence with a dot (.) and a number to do certain things. Amazing what 20
>years can chew up in memory. And trying to do mail merges was such a joy...but
>it did beat re-typing the addresses, if not by a whole lot.

Ah, dot commands! I wrote my Master's thesis - all 200 pages of it -
on a similar system called MUSIC (McGill University System for
Interactive Computing) Script on an IBM 370 mainframe. Real pain
trying to get columns aligned for tables of numbers (it was an
economics thesis). So when PCs and WordStar came along, I was already
pretty far up on the learning curve.

Incidentally, I ended finishing off my thesis in Edmonton. Even in
1981, I could use the AES word processor as a terminal, so I dialled
up McGill's computer, ran the program that turned my thesis into
paragraphs and pages, and downloaded (although it wasn't called that
then) my thesis to the word processor. It cost me about $19.00 in data
transfer charges. I still have the 9" floppy disks my thesis was saved
on.

>As a writer, I found the ability to go back and erase or change half a page so
>that pagination changed a real marvel. The program took care of it. When typing
>a ms., you had to go back to that point, re-type and then re-type ever blinking
>page (my editors got used to a lot of crossed out words, additions on rubber
>cemented sheets and so forth).

I guess you couldn't afford a dedicated word processor such as an AES
(although I think that was a Canadian company) or a Wang before the
PCs came along.

I also remember using C/PM machines and falling in love with
Supercalc. Of course, I quickly ran up my spreadsheets to 64K, so it
was back to FORTRAN or SAS to do lots of arithmetic.

Luigi
Replace "no" with "yk" for real email address

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Luigi Zanasi on 27/11/2003 7:47 AM

27/11/2003 5:35 PM

Luigi Zanasi writes:

>I guess you couldn't afford a dedicated word processor such as an AES
>(although I think that was a Canadian company) or a Wang before the
>PCs came along.

You got that right.

>I also remember using C/PM machines and falling in love with
>Supercalc. Of course, I quickly ran up my spreadsheets to 64K, so it
>was back to FORTRAN or SAS to do lots of arithmetic.

You know, to this day, I haven't got a clue as to how to operate ANY
spreadsheet. Don't want one, either.

Charlie Self

"Say what you will about the ten commandments, you must always come back to the
pleasant fact that there are only ten of them." H. L. Mencken



















Sd

Silvan

in reply to Bob McConnell on 27/11/2003 12:58 AM

27/11/2003 1:22 AM

Charlie Self wrote:

> As a writer, I found the ability to go back and erase or change half a

It *ruined* Piers Anthony. After he discovered computers, he started
writing crap.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 27/11/2003 1:22 AM

27/11/2003 9:59 AM

Silvan writes:

>> As a writer, I found the ability to go back and erase or change half a
>
>It *ruined* Piers Anthony. After he discovered computers, he started
>writing crap.

Some will say he just practiced writing crap before computers, then was able to
turn up the output so it was noticeable.

Charlie Self

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would
promise them missionaries for dinner." H. L. Mencken


















cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to [email protected] (Charlie Self) on 27/11/2003 9:59 AM

27/11/2003 1:04 PM

CharlieDIY wrote:

>>> As a writer, I found the ability to go back and erase or change half a
>>
>>It *ruined* Piers Anthony. After he discovered computers, he started
>>writing crap.
>
>Some will say he just practiced writing crap before computers, then was able
>to
>turn up the output so it was noticeable.
>

Another point: I quit reading Anthony years ago for a reason other than his
deteriorating writing: I got sick of his constant whines at the end of every
book about how badly his most recently dumped publisher treated him. Every
writer can complain about publishers, every writer either changes publishers or
uses more than one, unless they're in the fortunate position of having each
book sell a few hundred thousand copies in its first couple months. It's known
as making a living, something that isn't all pleasure for anyone I know.

Charlie Self

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would
promise them missionaries for dinner." H. L. Mencken


















Sd

Silvan

in reply to [email protected] (Charlie Self) on 27/11/2003 9:59 AM

27/11/2003 9:12 AM

Charlie Self wrote:

> Another point: I quit reading Anthony years ago for a reason other than
> his deteriorating writing: I got sick of his constant whines at the end
of every book about how badly his most recently dumped publisher treated

Yeah, me too. I was tempted to mail him a block of cheese at the end of
every book. Wah.

I really liked his early stuff, but it could well be due to my age at the
time.

> Every writer can complain about publishers, every writer either changes
> publishers or uses more than one, unless they're in the fortunate position

Or never gets published. Let's not forget that most writers by volume can't
get published unless they pay for the privledge. The ones earning any
money at all are the fortunate few. :)

(DAMHIKT... No I didn't actually pay to get published. I just gave up.
500 billion other people writing better versions of everything I ever
thought of writing. There are 10 trillion would-be authors in the world,
and only 500 of them make any money. Only 10 of them actually earn a
decent living at it. Sour grapes, hyperbole, sour grapes, hyperbole... :)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 27/11/2003 9:12 AM

27/11/2003 2:49 PM

Silvan responds:

>> Every writer can complain about publishers, every writer either changes
>> publishers or uses more than one, unless they're in the fortunate position
>
>Or never gets published. Let's not forget that most writers by volume can't
>get published unless they pay for the privledge. The ones earning any
>money at all are the fortunate few. :)
>
>(DAMHIKT... No I didn't actually pay to get published. I just gave up.
>500 billion other people writing better versions of everything I ever
>thought of writing. There are 10 trillion would-be authors in the world,
>and only 500 of them make any money. Only 10 of them actually earn a
>decent living at it. Sour grapes, hyperbole, sour grapes, hyperbole... :)

Depends on what you're writing, I think. I'm working on book #41 (might be #42:
I lost count) now, and will shortly sign for another. The money is NOT good for
woodworking writers, but it does seem to do a better job of being a long term
deal than do magazine articles. I've got one book I wrote in late '84 that
still brings in a few hundred bucks a year. That's about the only one, though,
which is largely my fault because a lot of the early books were written during
a deteriorating home situation when the money in hand was more necessary than
money in 2003, and onward. Flat fee stuff, in other words.

And far more than 500 make money at it. Let's not forget there are well over
40,000 books published annually in the U.S. alone. Maybe way more by now. And
Internet publishing has increased the actual numbers more than a little.

But there may not be many more than 5000 in this country who make GOOD money at
book writing. By good, I mean having the need to do only one book a year as
primary income source, and making at least 4 times the per U.S. capita income
($30,941 in 2002).

Charlie Self

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would
promise them missionaries for dinner." H. L. Mencken


















Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 27/11/2003 9:12 AM

27/11/2003 4:49 PM

Charlie Self wrote:

> Depends on what you're writing, I think. I'm working on book #41 (might be
> #42: I lost count) now, and will shortly sign for another. The money is

I can only imagine. Closest I came to getting published was a nice offer to
get a few volumes printed up for $2,000 or something like that.

Of course, I'm not saying I'm necessarily that good of a writer to start
with. That's part of the problem, really. I think I write very well, but
it doesn't matter what *I* think of my writing...

Anyway, all my self-piteous hyperbolic whining aside, I'm glad you're making
money doing something I've only dreamed of. Good on ya.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Silvan on 27/11/2003 4:49 PM

29/11/2003 2:34 PM

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:39:16 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>Charlie Self wrote:
>
>>>money doing something I've only dreamed of. Good on ya.
>>
>
>> eventually went back to school, and ended up with a BA in English, which
>> is really not a whole lot of help in writing. Couldn't find a job and had
>
>Hee... Me too, 'cept mine's in Spanish, French and Latin. Same thing,
>really. You read Dickens and Chaucer and Poe and Twain (or whomever) and I
>read Borges and Fuentes and des Cartes and Sartre and Caesar and Pliny.
>It's all pretty damn useless in the real world.

Au contraire, mi amigo. You'll need that Spanish in the new world
order in Norte America after the Shrub wrings the money out of the
US treasury and Señor Fox takes over. He already has just a few of
his agents here in the States, ready to help.

>> The money's not great, but it can be very, very enjoyable.

Which can be enjoyable, the money or the work?


>I've always thought it would be indeed, but I've just never gotten over the
>initial hump. I've even thought about trying to get on with the local rag
>as a columnist of some sort. I ca'nt do any wosre than the peuple they of
>rigint fore than now, and it might earn me wood money.

Sounds more like they need a freakin' editor, Charlie. Go for it!
We're all behind you.


==========================================================
CAUTION: Do not use remaining fingers as pushsticks!
==========================================================
http://www.diversify.com Comprehensive Website Development

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 27/11/2003 4:49 PM

28/11/2003 1:10 AM

Silvan writes:

>Anyway, all my self-piteous hyperbolic whining aside, I'm glad you're making
>money doing something I've only dreamed of. Good on ya.

Sort of an accident, too. I got out of the Marines and went to work for a small
ad agency, ending a short period as a copywriter. From there, I eventually went
back to school, and ended up with a BA in English, which is really not a whole
lot of help in writing. Couldn't find a job and had sold a couple items, so I
started freelancing motorcycle off-road stuff in upstate NY. Or from upstate
NY. That worked, so I slipped into DIY magazines and thence into woodworking.

The money's not great, but it can be very, very enjoyable.

Charlie Self

"Say what you will about the ten commandments, you must always come back to the
pleasant fact that there are only ten of them." H. L. Mencken



















Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 27/11/2003 4:49 PM

29/11/2003 1:02 PM

Larry Jaques wrote:

> Au contraire, mi amigo. You'll need that Spanish in the new world
> order in Norte America after the Shrub wrings the money out of the
> US treasury and Señor Fox takes over. He already has just a few of
> his agents here in the States, ready to help.

Doubt it. Most of those guys don't speak any language I can understand
anyway. It's about as close to textbook Spanish as that black hip hop
dialect is to textbook English, right right, nowumsain?

> Sounds more like they need a freakin' editor, Mikey. Go for it!
> We're all behind you.

Yeah thay dew fore shore.

I'm exaggerating, but really, some of their writing is truly *awful*.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 1:02 PM

29/11/2003 8:58 PM

Silvan writes:

>> Sounds more like they need a freakin' editor, Mikey. Go for it!
>> We're all behind you.
>
>Yeah thay dew fore shore.
>
>I'm exaggerating, but really, some of their writing is truly *awful*.

Then you had better never move to Parkersburg. This newspaper is dreadful on
its good days. The TV station is worse, but continues to win awards.
Incredible. The talking heats mumble, don't know the difference 'tween 'of' and
'for' and lots of good stuff like that.

A lot like my ex-boss, who had a good chance at spelling 'cat'...if you spotted
her the 'c', the 't' and explained that it was a small, furry animal that
purred. And she was sure that "cat's" was plural.


Charlie Self

"Say what you will about the ten commandments, you must always come back to the
pleasant fact that there are only ten of them." H. L. Mencken



















Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 1:02 PM

30/11/2003 8:56 PM

Luigi Zanasi wrote:

>>The only thing that bug's me more than people who don't know how to use
>>apostrophe's are people who put accents where they don't belong to make
> ^^^^^!!!!
> Isn't there a fundamental law of the universe stating that any usenet
> post complaining about or correcting spelling and grammatical mistakes
> will have spelling and/or grammar errors? :-)

Is your irony detector broken? :)

> I agree with you. My pet peeve is that dishwatery Seattle imitation of
> real caffè latte (in Italian) or café au lait (in French), the so
> called "Latté". Latte means milk, not coffee, and takes no accent.

I never thought about that. Of course, I don't know Italian. I can only
fake it a little.

> There is no longer any excuse with the multitude of language
> dictionaries on the web to misspell foreign words.

Nope.

> Here's a business idea for you, Silvan. Offer your services as an
> editor at the multitude of French and Spanish web sites with horrible
> English translations. For relatively benign examples, go see:

Hmmmm... That's a good angle to think about. Translations into one's
native tongue are always fundamentally better.

> Manuals". BTW, "Adieu" is one word. ;-)

Is it?

Yup. It is. Did it used to be two words, the way "today" used to be
spelled with a hypen? :)

Oh well. I freely admit my French sucks anyway. French never has been my
language. I only studied it because it was the only other offering at my
high school, and once I had it, I just continued. My accent is pretty
wretched too. I never have been able to get the vowels right.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

LB

Larry Blanchard

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 1:02 PM

29/11/2003 4:12 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Then you had better never move to Parkersburg. This newspaper is dreadful on
> its good days. The TV station is worse, but continues to win awards.
> Incredible. The talking heats mumble, don't know the difference 'tween 'of' and
> 'for' and lots of good stuff like that.
>
There was a letter to the editor in our local paper the other day where
someone complained that the letter writers should "get their thoughts in
order" before writing letters.

I couldn't resist. I wrote a letter pointing out that such a requirement
would reduce the volume by at least 2/3rds and deprive me and others of
much amusement.

Sort of "trolling" in the newspaper. I wonder how many flames I'll get
:-).

--
Where ARE those Iraqi WMDs?

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 1:02 PM

29/11/2003 9:19 PM

Charlie Self wrote:

> spotted her the 'c', the 't' and explained that it was a small, furry
> animal that purred. And she was sure that "cat's" was plural.

The only thing that bug's me more than people who don't know how to use
apostrophe's are people who put accents where they don't belong to make
things look "classy." There's some outfit that does strip malls all over
the Carolinas. Red and white signs that say "[Town Name] Centré."

The é in this instance is comparable to the -ed suffix in English, so those
signs read [Town Name] Centered. Just bugs the hell out of me.

Or worse, people who put accents on words that should have them, but the
wrong accents, or on the wrong letters. I've met women named Reneé (very
common) Reneè (equally common) and various permutations. Just makes me
want to slap people. Better not to do it at all than to try and get it
wrong.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

LZ

Luigi Zanasi

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 1:02 PM

30/11/2003 12:28 AM

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:19:28 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> scribbled

>Charlie Self wrote:
>
>> spotted her the 'c', the 't' and explained that it was a small, furry
>> animal that purred. And she was sure that "cat's" was plural.
>
>The only thing that bug's me more than people who don't know how to use
>apostrophe's are people who put accents where they don't belong to make
^^^^^!!!!
Isn't there a fundamental law of the universe stating that any usenet
post complaining about or correcting spelling and grammatical mistakes
will have spelling and/or grammar errors? :-)

>things look "classy." There's some outfit that does strip malls all over
>the Carolinas. Red and white signs that say "[Town Name] Centré."
>
>The é in this instance is comparable to the -ed suffix in English, so those
>signs read [Town Name] Centered. Just bugs the hell out of me.

I agree with you. My pet peeve is that dishwatery Seattle imitation of
real caffè latte (in Italian) or café au lait (in French), the so
called "Latté". Latte means milk, not coffee, and takes no accent.

>Or worse, people who put accents on words that should have them, but the
>wrong accents, or on the wrong letters. I've met women named Reneé (very
>common) Reneè (equally common) and various permutations. Just makes me
>want to slap people. Better not to do it at all than to try and get it
>wrong.

In my eyes, this is just as stupid and hilarious as the many
mistranslations of English seen in various tourist establishments
across the world and circulated throughout the net. You want to make
Italians laugh at your ignorance and pretension, spell it "latté". Or
calling a mall "[Town] Centré" is equally hilarious to francophones.

There is no longer any excuse with the multitude of language
dictionaries on the web to misspell foreign words.

Here's a business idea for you, Silvan. Offer your services as an
editor at the multitude of French and Spanish web sites with horrible
English translations. For relatively benign examples, go see:

http://www.uselinuxathome.com/ENindex.htm

or bits of the (OBWW) General web site

http://www.general.ca/

like "Security First" instead of "Safety First" and "Instructions
Manuals". BTW, "Adieu" is one word. ;-)

Luigi
Replace "no" with "yk" for real email address

LZ

Luigi Zanasi

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 1:02 PM

01/12/2003 12:49 PM

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:56:21 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> scribbled

>Luigi Zanasi wrote:
>
>>>The only thing that bug's me more than people who don't know how to use
>>>apostrophe's are people who put accents where they don't belong to make
>> ^^^^^!!!!
>> Isn't there a fundamental law of the universe stating that any usenet
>> post complaining about or correcting spelling and grammatical mistakes
>> will have spelling and/or grammar errors? :-)
>
>Is your irony detector broken? :)

Oops! It was. My lame excuse is that I dinna see "bug's", which makes
it rather obvious.

<snip>
>> Manuals". BTW, "Adieu" is one word. ;-)
>
>Is it?
>
>Yup. It is. Did it used to be two words, the way "today" used to be
>spelled with a hypen? :)

Yup, comes from "à Dieu" according to my Larousse. But that was way
before you were born. :)

>Oh well. I freely admit my French sucks anyway. French never has been my
>language. I only studied it because it was the only other offering at my
>high school, and once I had it, I just continued. My accent is pretty
>wretched too. I never have been able to get the vowels right.

That comes from speaking a mouth-deforming language like English all
your life. Almost no pure vowels, all diphthongs. And then you
Murricans insist on diphthonguizing some that should be pure, like the
"a" in cat.

Luigi
Writing this while drinking his second caffè latte this morning.
Replace "no" with "yk" for real email address

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 27/11/2003 4:49 PM

29/11/2003 12:39 AM

Charlie Self wrote:

>>money doing something I've only dreamed of. Good on ya.
>

> eventually went back to school, and ended up with a BA in English, which
> is really not a whole lot of help in writing. Couldn't find a job and had

Hee... Me too, 'cept mine's in Spanish, French and Latin. Same thing,
really. You read Dickens and Chaucer and Poe and Twain (or whomever) and I
read Borges and Fuentes and des Cartes and Sartre and Caesar and Pliny.
It's all pretty damn useless in the real world.

Stupid me, if I had realized that majoring in foreign languages meant
spending the last two thirds of my time doing literary analysis of the same
sort of yawn fodder I could have been reading as an English major (no
offense), I would have changed to biology or anthropology or something.

Probably wouldn't have changed the net outcome, and I'd still be driving a
truck, but I wish I hadn't pissed away my free education studying something
both useless and mind numbingly boring. I thought it was about *language*
(and it was, in the beginning), not *literature*.

Grammar, syntax, etymology, linguistics. Nope. Instead, it's about
spending 30 pages bullshitting about the deep significance of the author's
peculiar choice of subject pronouns in some book so intensely boring I
never could bring myself to finish it. (/La muerte de Artemio Cruz/ to be
precise, and I haven't a clue who wrote it.)

> The money's not great, but it can be very, very enjoyable.

I've always thought it would be indeed, but I've just never gotten over the
initial hump. I've even thought about trying to get on with the local rag
as a columnist of some sort. I ca'nt do any wosre than the peuple they of
rigint fore than now, and it might earn me wood money.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Tt

Trent©

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 12:39 AM

29/11/2003 8:09 PM

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:57:37 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Yeah, well, quit whining, McIntyre, and join the fucking club. I know. I
>know.

Exactly!

>Though I *would* like to get in print some day, so some of the original
>words I've invented can eventually wend their way into the OED. ;)

We ALL get in print some day. I'd like to wait just a little
longer...thank you very much! lol



Wishing you and yours a happy Thanksgiving season...

Trent

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 12:39 AM

29/11/2003 9:02 AM

Silvan writes:

>Hee... Me too, 'cept mine's in Spanish, French and Latin. Same thing,
>really. You read Dickens and Chaucer and Poe and Twain (or whomever) and I
>read Borges and Fuentes and des Cartes and Sartre and Caesar and Pliny.
>It's all pretty damn useless in the real world.

Read most of those, too, except in translation. Sartre translates well.

>Stupid me, if I had realized that majoring in foreign languages meant
>spending the last two thirds of my time doing literary analysis of the same
>sort of yawn fodder I could have been reading as an English major (no
>offense), I would have changed to biology or anthropology or something.

>Grammar, syntax, etymology, linguistics. Nope. Instead, it's about
>spending 30 pages bullshitting about the deep significance of the author's
>peculiar choice of subject pronouns in some book so intensely boring I
>never could bring myself to finish it. (/La muerte de Artemio Cruz/ to be
>precise, and I haven't a clue who wrote it.)

Water symbolism in Sir Gawain & The Green Knight. Or some such. It may have
been in The Great Gatsby, which was at least interesting reading, which SGATGK
was not. Of historical interest, but otherwise pure crap.

>I've always thought it would be indeed, but I've just never gotten over the
>initial hump. I've even thought about trying to get on with the local rag
>as a columnist of some sort. I ca'nt do any wosre than the peuple they of
>rigint fore than now, and it might earn me wood money

Dunno, man. The Roanoke paper is excellent for a small city. You should read
the Parkersburg paper. Or listen to the one local TV station. Stupidity reigns.
Does Blacksburg have its own paper?


Charlie Self

"Say what you will about the ten commandments, you must always come back to the
pleasant fact that there are only ten of them." H. L. Mencken



















MJ

"Mark Jerde"

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 12:39 AM

30/11/2003 5:04 AM

Silvan wrote:
> Mark Jerde wrote:
>
>> Anything you can safely do whilst driving, like listening to teaching
>> tapes
>> & voice recording thoughts & ideas? I've listened to 1000's of
>> hours of tapes over the years...
>
> I listen to lots o' stuff, but I have narry a clue how anything of
> that flavor might give me better options job wise.

Well, just off the top of my head, putting myself in your shoes, thinking
about "How can I make some money off my love of languages?"
- Written / spoken translation service. Uncle Sammy's so desperate for
some languages, I hear, you might be able to do it from your home.
- Tutoring
-- Foreign languages
-- English to U.S. newbies

I'm not saying these ideas are any good. Just agreeing with the late Earl
Nightengale that you can come up with at least one idea that can change your
life for the better.

-- Mark


Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 12:39 AM

30/11/2003 11:20 AM

Mark Jerde wrote:

> I'm not saying these ideas are any good. Just agreeing with the late Earl
> Nightengale that you can come up with at least one idea that can change
> your life for the better.

None of your ideas are bad per se, but they're variations on themes I've
pondered many times before. All I can really say is that I don't see
anything language-related in my future, for any of myriad reasons. A
decade ago, it might have been different, but I'm not the same person I was
then. The skills and the interest are both long cold.

When I no longer have to drive a truck to stave off bankruptcy, and can
weather a pay cut, I'll probably move into a different job with the same
employer. I'm already lining something up. I like my employer a great
deal; just not my job. The main reason I'm reaching a point where I can no
longer tolerate my job is because standing on an accelerator 10 hours a day
is ruining my knee.

Transferring to new job at the same place is a very practical, pragmatic,
mature dream. I keep my years of service, vacation, 401(k), profit
sharing, etc. These things are more important to me at this stage of life
than *what* I do for a living. I'd like to have a rewarding, fulfilling
career, but nothing I would *like* to do is capable of delivering a
regular, uninterrupted, absolutely dependable stream of income. The
mortgage company doesn't give a damn whether or not I'm content in my work;
they just want the house payment on time.

That, or I win the lottery and pay off the house. Then I have lots of
options.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

MJ

"Mark Jerde"

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 12:39 AM

29/11/2003 6:46 PM

Silvan wrote:

> Well, *those* dreams. I still have dreams. Different dreams.
> Mostly I'd like to find some profession that doesn't feel like a
> black hole for the hours I spend doing it. Something that could be
> part of my life, instead of something I have to wade through to get
> to the life bits in between.

Anything you can safely do whilst driving, like listening to teaching tapes
& voice recording thoughts & ideas? I've listened to 1000's of hours of
tapes over the years...

-- Mark

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 12:39 AM

29/11/2003 9:26 PM

Mark Jerde wrote:

> Anything you can safely do whilst driving, like listening to teaching
> tapes
> & voice recording thoughts & ideas? I've listened to 1000's of hours of
> tapes over the years...

I listen to lots o' stuff, but I have narry a clue how anything of that
flavor might give me better options job wise.

I guess really what I need to do is finish paying off some bills, so I can
afford to take a massive pay cut. If I could work for less money, I'd have
a lot of options. T minus 24 months or thereabouts.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

TD

Tim Douglass

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 12:39 AM

01/12/2003 4:48 PM

On 29 Nov 2003 09:02:39 GMT, [email protected] (Charlie Self)
wrote:

>Water symbolism in Sir Gawain & The Green Knight. Or some such.

Heh. My sister's Doctoral dissertation was on something in Sir Gawain
& the Green Knight - Maybe the origin of feminism in it or something.

Me, I was Co-Author of a computer book several years ago. Seems like I
made $2500 or so.

Tim Douglass

http://www.DouglassClan.com

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Tim Douglass on 01/12/2003 4:48 PM

02/12/2003 3:07 AM

Tim Douglass writes:

>
>Me, I was Co-Author of a computer book several years ago. Seems like I
>made $2500 or so.
>

Yeah, well...with 2 exceptions, I made more money in royalties off some 12 page
booklets I wrote back in '67 and '68 that were distributed, free by Lions'
Clubs, IIRC, to high school driver ed classes. And I only got half the
royalties because there was a "co-author" on the best of them. The co-authoer
loaned us his better known name, essentially, for half the payment. If memory
serves, I got about half a 8% royalty on a 25 or 30 cent booklet, but made
about $4500 the first year off at least one of them. Takes a lot of booklets...

Charlie Self

"I have as much authority as the Pope, I just don't have as many people who
believe it." George Carlin



















TD

Tim Douglass

in reply to Tim Douglass on 01/12/2003 4:48 PM

02/12/2003 10:02 AM

On 02 Dec 2003 03:07:23 GMT, [email protected] (Charlie Self)
wrote:

>Tim Douglass writes:
>
>>
>>Me, I was Co-Author of a computer book several years ago. Seems like I
>>made $2500 or so.
>>
>
>Yeah, well...with 2 exceptions, I made more money in royalties off some 12 page
>booklets I wrote back in '67 and '68 that were distributed, free by Lions'
>Clubs, IIRC, to high school driver ed classes. And I only got half the
>royalties because there was a "co-author" on the best of them. The co-authoer
>loaned us his better known name, essentially, for half the payment. If memory
>serves, I got about half a 8% royalty on a 25 or 30 cent booklet, but made
>about $4500 the first year off at least one of them. Takes a lot of booklets...

No too bad. To keep it in perspective, two of us worked for about 6
months full-time to produce that book - all for about $2500 each. Not
the best wages I've ever pulled. But the book gave us an "in" with
some people that resulted in a multi-million dollar contract for the
company, which was the real motivation for writing it.

Tim Douglass

http://www.DouglassClan.com

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Tim Douglass on 02/12/2003 10:02 AM

02/12/2003 6:33 PM

Tim Douglass responds:

>>loaned us his better known name, essentially, for half the payment. If
>memory
>>serves, I got about half a 8% royalty on a 25 or 30 cent booklet, but made
>>about $4500 the first year off at least one of them. Takes a lot of
>booklets...
>
>No too bad. To keep it in perspective, two of us worked for about 6
>months full-time to produce that book - all for about $2500 each. Not
>the best wages I've ever pulled. But the book gave us an "in" with
>some people that resulted in a multi-million dollar contract for the
>company, which was the real motivation for writing it.

That makes more sense. To add some perspective, when I wrote one of those
booklets, I'd just lost a job paying about $110 a week, doing writing and
magazine editing for the local (Schenectady--then channel 17--WMHT) public TV
station.

And I got $300 for my second or third magazine article sale, to Science &
Mechanics.

Charlie Self

"I have as much authority as the Pope, I just don't have as many people who
believe it." George Carlin



















Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 29/11/2003 12:39 AM

29/11/2003 12:57 PM

Charlie Self wrote:

>>It's all pretty damn useless in the real world.
>
> Read most of those, too, except in translation. Sartre translates well.

If you can stay awake long enough. :)

I think the day I really lost my spirit... Well, I had a prof who had kept
saying "use more references" and giving me B's and C's on my papers. See,
I was trying to think for myself, and analyze this stuff to her standards
on my own, which is what I mistook for the underlying purpose of the whole
endeavor.

I decided to show her, so I waited until the night before the paper was due,
then went the library. I checked out all these masters' and doctoral
theses about this book, then proceded to spend the night compiling other
people's thoughts into a new work where every single sentence was either
quoted or paraphrased; all with proper attribution. I made absolutely sure
there wasn't a single original thought or insight in the paper, and that
there was no chance anything I said could be mistaken for having come from
my own mind. Furthermore, I never even read the book I was "analyzing."

The paper came back, "A+++ Excellent! Your best work ever! Why can't you
do this more often?"

That's when it dawned on me that academia is pure bullshit, and Dr. D.
Michael McIntyre was never to be. I just couldn't see it after that, and I
had no idea what else to do with myself, so I got a job at Wal-Mart and
barely scraped through that last semester. I almost didn't graduate, and I
don't think I would have cared if I hadn't. (Having a pregnant
girlfriend-cum-wife at that point of my life didn't do anything to help
either, mind you.)

*That's* why I don't go to the highland festival thing. I never want to see
any of those people again. I didn't go to my graduation, and my diploma
sat around here for years before I bothered to frame it. It doesn't *mean*
anything. Looking back at the photos of my induction into all those
various honor societies, I can't even remember who any of those people were
anymore. All of my dreams evaporated when I got back that stupid paper
that should have been an F, and I was left in limbo.

Well, *those* dreams. I still have dreams. Different dreams. Mostly I'd
like to find some profession that doesn't feel like a black hole for the
hours I spend doing it. Something that could be part of my life, instead
of something I have to wade through to get to the life bits in between.

Yeah, well, quit whining, McIntyre, and join the fucking club. I know. I
know.

> Dunno, man. The Roanoke paper is excellent for a small city. You should

Not the Roanoke paper. No way I'd get on with them. I was talking about
the *local* rag. They of sum prety lame riting in that won. Usually 3/4
of the paper is given over to high school sports, all year round. Probably
the reason why I've never actually bothered to try. I'd get the job, and
then I'd have to feign an interest in high school sports, or else write
about the procedings at the lastest hearing to decide what color to paint
the light poles downtown. I'm not *that* desperate to get my name in print
somewhere.

Though I *would* like to get in print some day, so some of the original
words I've invented can eventually wend their way into the OED. ;)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Silvan on 27/11/2003 4:49 PM

29/11/2003 2:36 PM

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:39:16 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>Charlie Self wrote:
>
>>>money doing something I've only dreamed of. Good on ya.
>>
>
>> eventually went back to school, and ended up with a BA in English, which
>> is really not a whole lot of help in writing. Couldn't find a job and had
>
>Hee... Me too, 'cept mine's in Spanish, French and Latin. Same thing,
>really. You read Dickens and Chaucer and Poe and Twain (or whomever) and I
>read Borges and Fuentes and des Cartes and Sartre and Caesar and Pliny.
>It's all pretty damn useless in the real world.

Au contraire, mi amigo. You'll need that Spanish in the new world
order in Norte America after the Shrub wrings the money out of the
US treasury and Señor Fox takes over. He already has just a few of
his agents here in the States, ready to help.

>> The money's not great, but it can be very, very enjoyable.

Which can be enjoyable, the money or the work?


>I've always thought it would be indeed, but I've just never gotten over the
>initial hump. I've even thought about trying to get on with the local rag
>as a columnist of some sort. I ca'nt do any wosre than the peuple they of
>rigint fore than now, and it might earn me wood money.

Sounds more like they need a freakin' editor, Mikey. Go for it!
We're all behind you.


==========================================================
CAUTION: Do not use remaining fingers as pushsticks!
==========================================================
http://www.diversify.com Comprehensive Website Development

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Larry Jaques on 29/11/2003 2:36 PM

29/11/2003 3:33 PM

Larry Jaques writes:

>
>Which can be enjoyable, the money or the work?

Work. Money's money.

>>I've always thought it would be indeed, but I've just never gotten over the
>>initial hump. I've even thought about trying to get on with the local rag
>>as a columnist of some sort. I ca'nt do any wosre than the peuple they of
>>rigint fore than now, and it might earn me wood money.
>
>Sounds more like they need a freakin' editor, Mikey. Go for it!
>We're all behind you.

That's Silvan's area, not mine. No more jobs. I can't deal with the
backstabbing.



Charlie Self

"Say what you will about the ten commandments, you must always come back to the
pleasant fact that there are only ten of them." H. L. Mencken



















MJ

Mark & Juanita

in reply to Silvan on 27/11/2003 1:22 AM

27/11/2003 6:01 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Silvan writes:
>
> >> As a writer, I found the ability to go back and erase or change half a
> >
> >It *ruined* Piers Anthony. After he discovered computers, he started
> >writing crap.
>
> Some will say he just practiced writing crap before computers, then was able to
> turn up the output so it was noticeable.
>
> Charlie Self
>

I found all of his writings to be pretty tedious, even before
computers.

BM

Bob McConnell

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

28/11/2003 2:30 AM

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:48:18 +0000, [email protected]
(Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>
>In the mean time, Seattle Computing had transformed itself into "Digital
>Research", and after the 'exclusive' period of the license to MS expired,
>offered their own 'compatible' verson of a Disk Operating Ssystem, based
>on their 'original' QDOS (with enhancements to offer features comparable
>to the then-current MS offering).
>

Sorry Robert, you missed it here. Digital Research and Seattle
Computing were two completely different companies, in different
states. Gary Kildall's DRI sold CP/M and derivitives until it was
bought by Novell, which later sold the DRI properties to Caldera. SC
sold cheap computers, and later bare CPU chips, each with a licensed
copy of MS-DOS, until Bill Gates went back and bought out the original
license agreement. Last I checked, they were still in business, but I
have no idea what they are doing these days.

See the comp.os.cpm newsgroup for more details. Yes, it is still
active, averaging about 10 on-topic posts each day.

Bob McConnell
N2SPP

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

24/11/2003 10:06 AM

Charlie Self wrote:

> Silvan asks:
>
>>A friend had a Kaypro. One of those "almost" compatibles, right?
>
> No. cp/m was not intended as a compatible. It was there first, meant to
> become the big dog on the block, and using it almost cost KayPro its
> shirt, which it later lost anyway, IIRC.

OK, the one I'm thinking of was a green screen deal, no hard drives, and the
guy was trying to run DOS 3.x on it IIRC. Kept having minor problems with
stuff not working, and decided the computer was a chucker. It was a
hand-me-down by that point.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

J

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

24/11/2003 3:44 PM

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:53:54 -0800, Tim Douglass <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 24 Nov 2003 10:36:24 GMT, [email protected] (Charlie Self)
>wrote:
>
>>Silvan asks:
>>
>>>A friend had a Kaypro. One of those "almost" compatibles, right?
>>
>>No. cp/m was not intended as a compatible. It was there first, meant to become
>>the big dog on the block, and using it almost cost KayPro its shirt, which it
>>later lost anyway, IIRC.
>>
>>That portable cp/m machine was a delight. And weigh 22 pounds. Keyboard snap
>>latched to the 7" screen/case/cpu. Green screen. IIRC, you also had a choice of
>>amber, but at extra cost. I went for green. The package, with a Juki ball head
>>printer, cost me almost $2400 (Colonial Computers, Salem).
>>
>
>Ah, yes. Shades of my Osborne 1. Still stored around here somewhere. I
>wonder if the floppy disks will still read after 10 years or so.
>
I can still read 20+ year floppies made with my TI99/4a.

TD

Tim Douglass

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 1:14 AM

24/11/2003 11:53 AM

On 24 Nov 2003 10:36:24 GMT, [email protected] (Charlie Self)
wrote:

>Silvan asks:
>
>>A friend had a Kaypro. One of those "almost" compatibles, right?
>
>No. cp/m was not intended as a compatible. It was there first, meant to become
>the big dog on the block, and using it almost cost KayPro its shirt, which it
>later lost anyway, IIRC.
>
>That portable cp/m machine was a delight. And weigh 22 pounds. Keyboard snap
>latched to the 7" screen/case/cpu. Green screen. IIRC, you also had a choice of
>amber, but at extra cost. I went for green. The package, with a Juki ball head
>printer, cost me almost $2400 (Colonial Computers, Salem).
>

Ah, yes. Shades of my Osborne 1. Still stored around here somewhere. I
wonder if the floppy disks will still read after 10 years or so.

Tim Douglass

http://www.DouglassClan.com

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Tim Douglass on 24/11/2003 11:53 AM

24/11/2003 9:56 PM

Tim Douglass responds:

>>latched to the 7" screen/case/cpu. Green screen. IIRC, you also had a choice
>of
>>amber, but at extra cost. I went for green. The package, with a Juki ball
>head
>>printer, cost me almost $2400 (Colonial Computers, Salem).
>>
>
>Ah, yes. Shades of my Osborne 1. Still stored around here somewhere. I
>wonder if the floppy disks will still read after 10 years or so.
>

I cheated. I bought a PC (KayPro, natch), and sold the cp/m KP to a guy who was
setting up a garbage pick-up business. AFAIK, he was perfectly happy with it
for some time.

The PC was an 8 mHz (a speedster, though, as it ran at 10 mHz), 640K, with a 20
meg hard drive (went belly up in 3 months, so I laid out an extra $315 for a 32
meg drive). I refused to lay out $1100 to fill out the 640K to 1 meg.

Cost about the same as the KayPro cp/m had a couple years earlier.

Charlie Self

"Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog. Few people are interested and the
frog dies of it." E. B. White

















Ba

B a r r y B u r k e J r .

in reply to Tim Douglass on 24/11/2003 11:53 AM

25/11/2003 11:50 AM

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:44:20 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Charlie Self wrote:
>
>> Cost about the same as the KayPro cp/m had a couple years earlier.
>
>$2500 was always about what it took to get a new computer of any quality.
>
>I guess maybe it still is, but I can't imagine anyone *needing* what $2500
>gets you these days.

For my buck, a $500 computer does all I need. This consists of light
CAD, the web, usenet, Quicken, Word, Excel, Front Page, Corel Photo
Paint, several GPS mapping apps, email, CD burning, etc... The
Celeron even acts as my file server for the 4 station LAN in my home.

I don't do pro video editing or anything like that. I play games on
my $200 PS2. <G>

My last two machines were $3k.

Barry

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tim Douglass on 24/11/2003 11:53 AM

24/11/2003 6:44 PM

Charlie Self wrote:

> Cost about the same as the KayPro cp/m had a couple years earlier.

$2500 was always about what it took to get a new computer of any quality.

I guess maybe it still is, but I can't imagine anyone *needing* what $2500
gets you these days. The Wal-Mart after Thanksgiving cheapass piece of
crap computer this year is a 2.7 GHz Celeron with 256 MB of RAM, a 40 GB
hard drive, and a 17" monitor. Eghads. That's what a $498 computer looks
like today?

Mine is a l'il ol' 1 GHz. Considering that about all I do with it is browse
the web by modem and read usenet, I can't see upgrading it for many years
to come. I'll probably get a 10 GHz box for $498 when I do. :)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

TD

Tim Douglass

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

03/12/2003 9:09 AM

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 23:37:13 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Brian Henderson wrote:
>
>>>greasy, rip open a few knuckles, make a big mess on my driveway, and not
>>>have any time left over to do anything fun.
>>
>> If you know what you're doing, there's no mess and no ripped knuckles.
>> A socket set, a pair of long-nose pliers and brake parts and you're
>> done in an hour. No muss, no fuss.
>
>Yeah, whatever you say, Chief. No fuss, no muss, sounds like you're a
>freaking master mechanic for sure. Feel free to come by and do my brakes
>any time you want. I guaran-damn-tee you that you won't get through a job
>on one of *my* rust buckets in an hour. It'll probably take you that long
>just to get a wheel off.

Since I have an air compressor for my nail guns I bought an impact
wrench last Spring. That is far and away the best tool I've ever
bought for mechanical work. I've added an air ratchet to it as well.
Wish I'd had those 20 years ago when I was doing lots of work on cars.
Back then buddy and I once changed the clutch on his hot rod in about
2 hours, which isn't too bad when you consider it required removing
and reinstalling the engine.

Tim Douglass

http://www.DouglassClan.com

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

10/12/2003 9:33 PM

Mark & Juanita wrote:

> ... he probably is being unrealistic. The last time a lot of people
> bought a CD was seven years ago, and it isn't because they're
> downloading .wav's; there just isn't that much good stuff out there. But

True. I like *looking* at a lot of what's out there now, but with the
volume off for pity's sake!

> then, like I've said before, IMO, they stopped writing music in about
> 1820 or so.

More like the 1700s.

Well, except for Pink Floyd. J. S. Bach and Pink Floyd. What a weirdo I
am.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

25/11/2003 10:33 AM

Silvan writes:

>$2500 was always about what it took to get a new computer of any quality.
>
>I guess maybe it still is, but I can't imagine anyone *needing* what $2500
>gets you these days. The Wal-Mart after Thanksgiving cheapass piece of
>crap computer this year is a 2.7 GHz Celeron with 256 MB of RAM, a 40 GB
>hard drive, and a 17" monitor. Eghads. That's what a $498 computer looks
>like today?

It makes my head hurt. I got a new computer about 6 months ago. 3 gig Pentium
4; 1 gig of RAM, 120 gig hard drive. Same old monitor. The thing has some
extras, fast CD burner (no DVD: save that for later, when the prices are down
in the CD range), I had them add a floppy drive, something like 6 USB 2 ports,
modem, network card, couple things I'd have to look up. $1700. For the original
$2500, I think I could have replaced my 19" monitor with a 21" or gotten a good
19" LCD. I got this because I was doing more and more digital photography, and
the loads with the older machine were eating on my nerves.

My wife got my old 1 gig Pentium 3. That has only 3/4 gig of RAM. I've found
over the years that the best and cheapest speed-up is adding RAM.

The youngest kid got the machine my wife had been using (300 mHz?).

Keep it in the family and recycle.

I built both those older machines, so they were a lot cheaper. This time
around, I let George do it.

Charlie Self

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would
promise them missionaries for dinner." H. L. Mencken


















TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

11/12/2003 9:58 PM

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:33:05 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:


>Well, except for Pink Floyd.

OBWW: "Careful with that axe, Eugene."


Regards, Tom
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

CC

ClydesdaleMTB

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

03/12/2003 4:24 PM


>>Brian Henderson wrote:

>>Yeah, whatever you say, Chief. No fuss, no muss, sounds like you're a
>>freaking master mechanic for sure. Feel free to come by and do my brakes
>>any time you want. I guaran-damn-tee you that you won't get through a job
>>on one of *my* rust buckets in an hour. It'll probably take you that long
>>just to get a wheel off.

Sounds like your vehicles suffer from both your ham fisted mechanical
skills as well as years of pitiful neglect.

I do ALL my own mechanical work and there is not a single job on any of
my cars I cannot do myself. From a simple brake job, all the way to
dropping the transmission out or pulling the motor and stripping the
block.... and these are OLD New England vehicles (salt+snow+age=rust).

--
John G.
http://www.shavings.net/survival.htm


1987 745 Turbo 440,000 miles
1988 764 Turbo 310,000 miles
1988 765 turbo 145,000 miles

IE

Iraxl Enb

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

11/12/2003 3:49 PM

> More like the 1700s.
>
> Well, except for Pink Floyd. J. S. Bach and Pink Floyd. What a weirdo I
> am.
>

Floyd and ELP. And nothing else matters I guess...

irax.

MJ

Mark & Juanita

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

11/12/2003 4:58 AM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Mark & Juanita wrote:
>
> > ... he probably is being unrealistic. The last time a lot of people
> > bought a CD was seven years ago, and it isn't because they're
> > downloading .wav's; there just isn't that much good stuff out there. But
>
> True. I like *looking* at a lot of what's out there now, but with the
> volume off for pity's sake!
>
> > then, like I've said before, IMO, they stopped writing music in about
> > 1820 or so.
>
> More like the 1700s.
>
> Well, except for Pink Floyd. J. S. Bach and Pink Floyd. What a weirdo I
> am.
>

Nah, I kind of share that kind of taste (or maybe we both aren't
within the 3 sigma limits ;-) )

>

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

30/11/2003 3:05 AM

Brian Henderson wrote:

> My point was that it would have cost me 2-3x more to buy an entirely
> new system. One place quoted me $2200 for a computer that I built
> myself for $500. A couple others couldn't even build the system I
> wanted because they only used Intel chips and I wanted AMD.

You were calling the wrong places, mayhap. These people are local, and
they're Chinese. They have really good prices. I think maybe they get
good deals from the manufacturers because they speak Chinese fluently. :)

I wouldn't pay $1700 not to build it myself, but for as much as $50, screw
it, call me when it's ready.

> I do most of my own work. I did my wife's rear brakes a week ago or
> so for $40, which included pads and having both rotors resurfaced. It
> took me about an hour. If I took it to the shop, they'd charge me
> $200 and take 2 days.
>
> Tell me which is better?

If I had $200 I wouldn't miss (and it would take a *lot* for me not to miss
$200, granted), I'd pay the wrench jockey to do it.

Not better, not worse. I can do a brake job. Take an afternoon and get
greasy, rip open a few knuckles, make a big mess on my driveway, and not
have any time left over to do anything fun.

I guess that's it right there. Working on my car used to be an end unto
itself. Something I *did* for fun. Now it's something I *have* to do,
that robs me of time spent doing something else.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 30/11/2003 3:05 AM

30/11/2003 10:22 AM

Silvan writes:

>
>I guess that's it right there. Working on my car used to be an end unto
>itself. Something I *did* for fun. Now it's something I *have* to do,
>that robs me of time spent doing something else.

Yeah. I can remember doing a lot of work on my old Studebaker because I had to,
but it was also fun. I enjoyed hell out of ripping into my new '57
Chevy...until it came time to tune those dual 4 barrels. Went screaming to my
old man for help then.

But now, I don't even like to check the oil. What a difference a *few* years
can make!


Charlie Self

"Say what you will about the ten commandments, you must always come back to the
pleasant fact that there are only ten of them." H. L. Mencken



















LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Silvan on 30/11/2003 3:05 AM

01/12/2003 4:52 AM

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:01:03 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>I used to do it twice a year, but I only put 1200 miles a year on my car,
>and it just seems like a waste of money, skin, blood, and hand cleaner.

And all that condensed water in the oil (now creating sulphuric acid)
is actually -good- for the bearings, right?

Do yourself a favor. Spend $18.67 every 4 months at WallyWorld and
get fresh oil installed. (Your engine may outlive you.)


==============================================================
Like peace and quiet? Buy a phoneless cord.
http://www/diversify.com/stees.html Hilarious T-shirts online
==============================================================

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 30/11/2003 3:05 AM

30/11/2003 9:01 PM

Charlie Self wrote:

> But now, I don't even like to check the oil. What a difference a *few*
> years can make!

Yeah, and with me it's only about a decade. Maybe even five years since I
used to enjoy that stuff.

Reminds me, I need to change the oil next year. :)

I used to do it twice a year, but I only put 1200 miles a year on my car,
and it just seems like a waste of money, skin, blood, and hand cleaner.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

MJ

Mark & Juanita

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

10/12/2003 3:14 AM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Swingman wrote:
>
> > ... Hell of it is, judging from what I am hearing these days, I probably
> > turned down a future Grammy engineer.
>
> Yup, probably. One of the guys unloading my truck yesterday... Well, he's
> one of *those* kids. I made some comment in good-natured jest, and his
> reply was "Man, I ain't gonna be doin' this for long, man, I'm gonna go to
> college and become a sound engineer and then I'm gonna be rich as fuck dude
> so be nice to me."
>
> Yeah, OK, sure... I don't even think he's being unrealistic, considering
> the last time I bought a newly-released CD was seven years ago, and it
> wasn't that good. :)
>
>

... he probably is being unrealistic. The last time a lot of people
bought a CD was seven years ago, and it isn't because they're
downloading .wav's; there just isn't that much good stuff out there. But
then, like I've said before, IMO, they stopped writing music in about
1820 or so.

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Mark & Juanita on 10/12/2003 3:14 AM

10/12/2003 7:16 AM

Mark & Juanitia writes:

>> Yup, probably. One of the guys unloading my truck yesterday... Well, he's
>> one of *those* kids. I made some comment in good-natured jest, and his
>> reply was "Man, I ain't gonna be doin' this for long, man, I'm gonna go to
>> college and become a sound engineer and then I'm gonna be rich as fuck dude
>> so be nice to me."
>>
>> Yeah, OK, sure... I don't even think he's being unrealistic, considering
>> the last time I bought a newly-released CD was seven years ago, and it
>> wasn't that good. :)
>>
>>
>
> ... he probably is being unrealistic. The last time a lot of people
>bought a CD was seven years ago, and it isn't because they're
>downloading .wav's; there just isn't that much good stuff out there. But
>then, like I've said before, IMO, they stopped writing music in about
>1820 or so.

I was trying to recall when the last time I bought a CD was...about 2-3 years
ago, picked up a couple Kenny G recordings. At the same time, I bought some
rock music...Bill Haley & The Comets and an old Ann Murray. My musical
sophistication doesn't reach back as far as Mark's, or as deeply probably, but
in all honesty, I can say F**K every other word without paying 15 bucks for the
CD. Or without thinking about someone like Leean Rimes, in an article in
yesterday's paper, talking about how she straightened her life out after "all
her troubles." The kid's 21, worth maybe 50 million bucks, and who gives a
damn.

I can remember his name now...ah, English for yard, Garth something or
other...who kept putting out medicore songs in a medicore voice and selling
millions of copies, while telling his fans that they had to take chances, get
involved. IIRC, he retired at 35 or so, worth nearly half a billion.

I'm not about to add to it.

Charlie Self

"In the final choice a soldier's pack is not so heavy as a prisoner's chains."
Dwight D. Eisenhower





















cC

[email protected] (Conan the Librarian)

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

12/12/2003 5:19 AM

Larry Jaques <jake@di\/ersify.com> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...

> I saw Keith Emerson spinning and playing 8' off the stage
> wilst strapped to a piano bench and an electric grand piano
> (or was that the MOOG?) at the Cal Jam. THE Cal Jam, not some
> second string later concert. We were close enough to center
> of the infield that the QUAD sound system worked.
> </dating myself>

Ahem. First of all, it's bad form to date yourself, but I guess if
no one else will do it. As for ELP, I saw them play in what I'm
guessing was the same tour (around the time of the release of Brain
Salad Surgery). Quad sound and Emerson was playing what looked like a
cross between a giant B-3 and something from Phantom of the Opera.
(Or was that the drugs?)

They were right in the middle of Take A Pebble (and it's about a 12
minute song on the album, and much longer live) when the cops pulled
the plug and turned all the lights on. It seems they were trying to
enforce a no-smoking ban and some of the crowd wasn't cooperating.
*cough*

While the law officer was waddling offstage, Emerson started into
something that sounded strangely like keystone cops music. He then
proceeded to re-start Take A Pebble from the beginning and this time
there were no interruptions.

IIRC, they closed the show with Karn Evil ("come see the show",
etc.) and he ended it with the effects on the quad system going
full-tilt-boogie from corner to corner of the auditorium while the
synthesizer went up in smoke. (Or was that the drugs?)

A couple of years ago I dug out a bunch of old ELP stuff, and when
I put it on I was struck by how pretentious, overbearing and pompous
it was. In other words, it sounded as good as ever.


Chuck Vance
Just say (tmPL) God, those were the days. (Or was that the
drugs?)

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

11/12/2003 1:55 AM

Mark Jerde wrote:

> Some Metallica and Rammstein music is to me non-boring. (Most music is.)
> Are you familiar with either of these bands? [snip]

I know what the Metallica logo looks like, sort of. Does that count? :)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

12/12/2003 2:11 AM

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:16:22 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>Larry Jaques wrote:
>
>> I've seen P.D.Q. Bach in concert (what a hoot) and still
>> adore Pink Floyd.
>
>A man of good taste then. What's your favorite album?

Very hard to choose, but probably a tie between "Obscured
by Clouds" and "Dark Side of the Moon".

Favorite songs: Free Four, Childhood's End, Fearless,
Wish You Were Here, Several Species of Small Furry Animals
Gathered Together in a Cave and Grooving With a Pict, Time,
Breathe, Shine On You Crazy Diamond, (their early stuff)

Of course, I liked Zappa and King Crimson, too.


>I guess I'd have to say mine is "Wish You Were Here," but it's not out front
>by much.

EXCELLENT song.


>> Much of today's music could be considered chamber pot music.
>> Rap makes me miss disco.
>
>Actually, there were two or three good disco songs.

No comment. <gag, kaff, choke>


>There might even be a
>good country song. Rap/hip hop is the musical equivalent of bird cage
>lining.

Ah, you betcha.


"Ka ka kaoum ba, wheeeee-eeeee.", brother.


(from SSOSAGTIACAGWAP)


P.S: Now people will have no doubt whatsoever about my sanity.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
I sent in my $5, so * http://www.diversify.com/stees.html
why haven't I been 'saved'? * Graphic Design - Humorous T-shirts

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

11/12/2003 4:47 PM

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:33:05 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>Well, except for Pink Floyd. J. S. Bach and Pink Floyd. What a weirdo I
>am.

I've seen P.D.Q. Bach in concert (what a hoot) and still
adore Pink Floyd.

Much of today's music could be considered chamber pot music.
Rap makes me miss disco.


----------------------------------------------------
Thesaurus: Ancient reptile with excellent vocabulary
http://diversify.com Dynamic Website Applications
====================================================

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

09/12/2003 8:22 PM

Swingman wrote:

> ... Hell of it is, judging from what I am hearing these days, I probably
> turned down a future Grammy engineer.

Yup, probably. One of the guys unloading my truck yesterday... Well, he's
one of *those* kids. I made some comment in good-natured jest, and his
reply was "Man, I ain't gonna be doin' this for long, man, I'm gonna go to
college and become a sound engineer and then I'm gonna be rich as fuck dude
so be nice to me."

Yeah, OK, sure... I don't even think he's being unrealistic, considering
the last time I bought a newly-released CD was seven years ago, and it
wasn't that good. :)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

BH

Brian Henderson

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

30/11/2003 11:58 PM

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 03:05:56 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:

>You were calling the wrong places, mayhap. These people are local, and
>they're Chinese. They have really good prices. I think maybe they get
>good deals from the manufacturers because they speak Chinese fluently. :)

Half these places were the Chinese guys and they were still
overcharging. Their retail markup must be ridiculous, plus they were
trying to charge $75 an hour for labor.

>Not better, not worse. I can do a brake job. Take an afternoon and get
>greasy, rip open a few knuckles, make a big mess on my driveway, and not
>have any time left over to do anything fun.

If you know what you're doing, there's no mess and no ripped knuckles.
A socket set, a pair of long-nose pliers and brake parts and you're
done in an hour. No muss, no fuss.

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

25/11/2003 9:25 AM

Charlie Self wrote:

> I built both those older machines, so they were a lot cheaper. This time
> around, I let George do it.

Me too, incidentally. I used to build'em myself, spec every part, tweak,
diddle, and massage for the ultimate performance.

Now it's just not worth the headache of making sure this will work with
that. I got my last computer at a local place. It cost the same whether I
had them build it or not, so I let them do it.

Not sure what I'll do next time, since I don't want to pay the Microsoft
tax, and they don't like to build computers without operating systems. I
guess I'll worry about it later.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Silvan on 25/11/2003 9:25 AM

04/12/2003 4:33 PM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 02:45:33 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>solarman wrote:
>
>> We got "skills" man....SKILLS... I always loved the look of
>> someone who couldn't figure out where all the wires and hoses
>> go....and then we put them all back in a couple of minutes...
>
>I'll bet. That's one I've never had any real desire to do, even back when I
>was thinking of myself as a car guy.

That was my forte, too. I loved tearing into dashboards and creating
new wiring harnesses for crashed vehicles when we couldn't find a new
harness. Ever use 2 full rolls of electrical tape on a single project?
Of course, doing that on a full and dripping garbage truck was the one
time I really disliked that job. Their taillight harness got chewed
by a wheel and I had to rewire it when it was full and R I P E !

I have more fun behind a keyboard nowadays, though.

-----
= The wealth of reality, cannot be seen from your locality. =
http://www.diversify.com Comprehensive Website Development

BH

Brian Henderson

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

05/12/2003 3:49 AM

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 16:24:06 -0500, ClydesdaleMTB
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>>Brian Henderson wrote:
>>>Yeah, whatever you say, Chief. No fuss, no muss, sounds like you're a
>>>freaking master mechanic for sure. Feel free to come by and do my brakes
>>>any time you want. I guaran-damn-tee you that you won't get through a job
>>>on one of *my* rust buckets in an hour. It'll probably take you that long
>>>just to get a wheel off.
>
>Sounds like your vehicles suffer from both your ham fisted mechanical
>skills as well as years of pitiful neglect.

Actually, I didn't write that, that was a response to me. Watch the
attribs. ;)

>I do ALL my own mechanical work and there is not a single job on any of
>my cars I cannot do myself. From a simple brake job, all the way to
>dropping the transmission out or pulling the motor and stripping the
>block.... and these are OLD New England vehicles (salt+snow+age=rust).

Pretty much the same here, although there are some jobs I will hand
off to the professionals, simply because they've got better tools and
more time than I do. But I certainly can drop a transmission or pull
an engine or replace any component in the car if necessary and more
often than not, I can do it for 1/3 the price and time that a
professional shop can.

BH

Brian Henderson

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

26/11/2003 1:05 AM

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:25:44 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Now it's just not worth the headache of making sure this will work with
>that. I got my last computer at a local place. It cost the same whether I
>had them build it or not, so I let them do it.

Last time I did a complete upgrade, I went around and got some price
quotes for the system if they installed it. The prices I got ended up
being 2-3x as much as it cost me to just do it myself and that's not
even counting the money I saved using perfectly good components that I
already had. In the end, the labor costs far exceeded the hardware
costs and I'm about the cheapest labor I know. ;)

mm

"mrdancer"

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

01/12/2003 6:02 PM

"Silvan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Brian Henderson wrote:
>
> > My point was that it would have cost me 2-3x more to buy an entirely
> > new system. One place quoted me $2200 for a computer that I built
> > myself for $500. A couple others couldn't even build the system I
> > wanted because they only used Intel chips and I wanted AMD.
>
> You were calling the wrong places, mayhap. These people are local, and
> they're Chinese. They have really good prices. I think maybe they get
> good deals from the manufacturers because they speak Chinese fluently. :)

IMHO, I can build a cheap computer for roughly what a cheap computer costs
at WallyWorld (e.g. - eMachines). When the components of the system
approach $1000 or so, is where there is a real advantage to
'building-yer-own'. I get most of my parts from newegg.com, they have
excellent service and decent prices.

The main reason I build my own systems (and those for my friends) is that I
know what kind of components are going into the system. I can pick and
choose my own quality power supply, heatsink, fans, etc. With a cheap
eMachine system, you're getting a cheap POS power supply that will likely
give you problems on your first upgrade or addition of a powered
peripheral... that's a headache I don't need.

Besides, I order the parts from newegg, they come to my door 4 days later
tax-free, and I can put the system together in the time it takes me to drive
to WallyWorld, deal w/ the hassle of the WallyWorld crowds, and drive back
home. ;-)

SC

Scott Cramer

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

12/12/2003 3:30 PM

On 12 Dec 2003, Conan the Librarian spake unto rec.woodworking:

> A couple of years ago I dug out a bunch of old ELP stuff, and when
> I put it on I was struck by how pretentious, overbearing and pompous
> it was. In other words, it sounded as good as ever.

Amen to that. I lived in north Jersey during my high school years,
half an hour from New York City. Got to see lots of great shows at Madison
Square Garden and the Capitol Theater in Passaic - Jethro Tull, Allman
Bros., Frank Zappa & the Mothers, and speaking of pompous and pretentious,
Yes. Rick Wakeman wasn't quite as bombastic as Keith Emerson, but he
wasn't any slouch, either.

The most memorable - this was the late sixties to mid 70's, mind you,
so 'memorable' is relative - was a Pink Floyd concert on the 4th of July at
the Garden. It was the 'Animals' tour, we had seats on the floor about 12
rows from the stage, dead center. They played most of 'Wish You Were Here'
and some of 'Dark Side of the Moon' in addition to 'Animals.' At one point
some idiots in the nosebleed seats started tossing firecrackers off the
balconies (it being the 4th of July, after all) and Roger Waters got
seriously ticked off and interrupted the show, telling the malefactors to
"sod off." The crowd went wild, and the nonsense stopped.

Today's synthetic pop crap and rap "music" can't hold a candle, never
mind 20,000 Bic lighters, to those days.

MJ

"Mark Jerde"

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

11/12/2003 5:17 AM

Silvan wrote:

>> then, like I've said before, IMO, they stopped writing music in about
>> 1820 or so.
>
> More like the 1700s.
>
> Well, except for Pink Floyd. J. S. Bach and Pink Floyd. What a
> weirdo I am.

Some Metallica and Rammstein music is to me non-boring. (Most music is.)
Are you familiar with either of these bands? Neither is chained to the "E
cord, E minor cord, and bar" of so many other bands.

-- Mark


Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

09/12/2003 11:48 PM

Sounds like the guy who called me for a job today. Fresh out of some 6 month
wonder engineer course, probably paid for with my tax dollars: "Duh .....
man! ......... uh, not .... sure ........ hey, but did I, uh ..... call you,
uh ... yesterday? I, uh .... can't remember ..... but,... hey, I am, uh ....
looking to go, uh to, you know, to work, in .... a , you know ...uh, .... a
recording studio. Who did ... you, uh say .... uh, this was?"

... Hell of it is, judging from what I am hearing these days, I probably
turned down a future Grammy engineer.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03


"Henry E Schaffer" wrote in message

> First, I said unscrew the screws holding on the rim of the headlight.
> He removes the first screw ok, drops it on the ground, and moves the
> screwdriver to the next screw head.
>
> "Wait" I said "first practice putting back the screw you just removed."
>
> Talk about a blank look! "It disappeared!" he wailed.
>
> (Yes, I watched where it fell - and everything then went fine.)
>
> Was his problem "lack of skill"? I'd call it something else - more
> like paying attention, or keeping focused.
> --
> --henry schaffer
> [email protected]

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to "Swingman" on 09/12/2003 11:48 PM

15/12/2003 5:01 AM

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:06:08 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>Frank Shute wrote:
>
>> About the only modern band I listen to nowadays is Blur, most of the
>> rest is overpriced effluent. Record sales going down because of
>> piracy? I think not.

(Sorry, Frank, but I'm not with you on Blur having just listened
to the first 6 samples from their 'Best Of' CD.)


>Yeah, seriously. I don't even go to record stores anymore. What's the
>point? While there's some stuff there I wouldn't mind having, it's a
>matter of buying an entire CD for one mildly interesting song, and the
>cheap CDs are $25 now. I don't have money to piss away like that.

Go to www.cheap-cds.com and get all the old stuff for under ten bucks.
(Up until this year when they upped their shipping rates, their
handling rates, and the CD prices.) But they're still the best deal
in^H^Hout of town now that they get $3 more per title, the greedy
bastids.(either at Cheap or distributors)


---
- Sarcasm is just one more service we offer. -
http://diversify.com Web Applications

Sd

Silvan

in reply to "Swingman" on 09/12/2003 11:48 PM

16/12/2003 10:27 AM

Larry Jaques wrote:

> Go to www.cheap-cds.com and get all the old stuff for under ten bucks.

Hrm... Under ten bucks sounds good.

> (Up until this year when they upped their shipping rates, their
> handling rates, and the CD prices.) But they're still the best deal
> in^H^Hout of town now that they get $3 more per title, the greedy
> bastids.(either at Cheap or distributors)

Oh.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

fF

[email protected] (Frank Shute)

in reply to "Swingman" on 09/12/2003 11:48 PM

15/12/2003 8:06 AM

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:01:40 GMT, Larry Jaques wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:06:08 -0500, Silvan
><[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:
>
>>Frank Shute wrote:
>>
>>> About the only modern band I listen to nowadays is Blur, most of the
>>> rest is overpriced effluent. Record sales going down because of
>>> piracy? I think not.
>
> (Sorry, Frank, but I'm not with you on Blur having just listened
> to the first 6 samples from their 'Best Of' CD.)
>

Not to worry....they're an acquired taste! I was going to mention that
I quite liked `Great Gig in the Sky' but I thought better of it ;)

With regards the original question `Is Usenet Dying?' No. I've seen
other groups undergo troll attacks like this group recently
experienced; eventually the trolls get bored (like the one on this
group seems to have done) and some semblance of sanity returns.
Filters are essential though.

Whilst people keep on reading news the ISPs will support it. A full
feed sucks up a frightening amount of bandwidth/storage but
bandwidth/storage prices are falling and as far as I'm concerned I
wouldn't consider using an ISP that didn't offer netnews.

We're in a small minority of 'net users but you have to remember that
most of the techs at ISPs really need to read Usenet in order to do
their jobs, since that's the case it's then trivial to give your
customers access to your news server.

--

Frank

hH

[email protected] (Henry E Schaffer)

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

04/12/2003 7:16 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
solarman <[email protected]> wrote:
>We got "skills" man....SKILLS... I always loved the look of
>someone who couldn't figure out where all the wires and hoses
>go....and then we put them all back in a couple of minutes...
> ...

Some of the skills aren't so hard if you pay attention. A buddy of
mine needed to replace a burned out headlight and wanted to have a
garage do it because he wasn't sufficiently "skilled". I told him I'd
talk him through the job.

First, I said unscrew the screws holding on the rim of the headlight.
He removes the first screw ok, drops it on the ground, and moves the
screwdriver to the next screw head.

"Wait" I said "first practice putting back the screw you just removed."

Talk about a blank look! "It disappeared!" he wailed.

(Yes, I watched where it fell - and everything then went fine.)

Was his problem "lack of skill"? I'd call it something else - more
like paying attention, or keeping focused.
--
--henry schaffer
[email protected]

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

12/12/2003 9:25 PM

Larry Jaques wrote:

> Very hard to choose, but probably a tie between "Obscured
> by Clouds" and "Dark Side of the Moon".

I like DSotM a good bit too, but it just doesn't do quite as much for me as
some of their other albums. Probably because I never have learned to love
"the Great Gag in the Sky" (That's a joke, Larry... Gag, as in horking,
ralphing, spewing... I hate that song. Which probably means you think
it's the best part of the whole album. :)

> Favorite songs: Free Four, Childhood's End, Fearless,
> Wish You Were Here, Several Species of Small Furry Animals
> Gathered Together in a Cave and Grooving With a Pict, Time,
> Breathe, Shine On You Crazy Diamond, (their early stuff)

Add "Julia Dream" and "That Fat Old Sun" to that list.

I like "The Wall" but not as much as most people do, and anything after that
is crap.

> Of course, I liked Zappa and King Crimson, too.

Titties and beer... What was that, "Baby Snakes?"

Barfing Pumpkin Records I think... Wow, it's been a long time. I'm not a
Zappa fan, but my best friend growing up adored him.

>>I guess I'd have to say mine is "Wish You Were Here," but it's not out
>>front by much.
>
> EXCELLENT song.

One of the few "real" songs I can play on the guitar too. I seldom try to
play other people's music, so most people think I "can't play anything"
until I break that one out.

SWMBO's bedtime song too. I've been playing that every night for her for
years now.

>>Actually, there were two or three good disco songs.
>
> No comment. <gag, kaff, choke>

Well, come on, I grew up listening to the BeeGees. Mom was a big fan. Some
of it rubbed off.

>>good country song. Rap/hip hop is the musical equivalent of bird cage
>>lining.
>
> Ah, you betcha.
>
> "Ka ka kaoum ba, wheeeee-eeeee.", brother.

I thought it was just "ba BUZZ BUZZ thump BUZZ thump mothaFUKKA" repeated
for ad nauseam, with brief bits of sampled James Brown stuck in for
variety.

(Now, James Brown makes me want to say it loud that I'm black and I'm proud
and get up offa that thang and I feel good. James Brown rocks, ba ba ba ba
bum, yeah. It's not because I'm a white guy that I don't like rap.)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

11/12/2003 10:56 AM


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:33:05 -0500, Silvan
>

> I've seen P.D.Q. Bach in concert (what a hoot) and still
> adore Pink Floyd.

Hey, Betty Sue Bach was an awesome player ... you gotta be to play those
notes that fall off the staff into a pile on the page like that.


> Rap makes me miss disco.

An excellent wielding of the ultimate musical insult.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03


Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

03/12/2003 7:06 PM

Tim Douglass wrote:

> Since I have an air compressor for my nail guns I bought an impact
> wrench last Spring. That is far and away the best tool I've ever

Wouldn't do me any good since it would just wrench the studs off anyway. :)

> bought for mechanical work. I've added an air ratchet to it as well.
> Wish I'd had those 20 years ago when I was doing lots of work on cars.
> Back then buddy and I once changed the clutch on his hot rod in about
> 2 hours, which isn't too bad when you consider it required removing
> and reinstalling the engine.

If it was an old car 20 years ago, it was probably relatively easy to pull
the engine. People from the '60s back had it made. Nowadays it's hard to
even *find* the engine under all the wires and hoses.

Still, that's pretty impressive!

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 03/12/2003 7:06 PM

14/12/2003 12:06 PM

Frank Shute wrote:

> About the only modern band I listen to nowadays is Blur, most of the
> rest is overpriced effluent. Record sales going down because of
> piracy? I think not.

Yeah, seriously. I don't even go to record stores anymore. What's the
point? While there's some stuff there I wouldn't mind having, it's a
matter of buying an entire CD for one mildly interesting song, and the
cheap CDs are $25 now. I don't have money to piss away like that.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Gg

"Glen"

in reply to Silvan on 03/12/2003 7:06 PM

14/12/2003 10:26 PM

I think the last CD I bought was the collected works of Tom Leher (sp?) A
true nut case, God bless him!

Glen

"Silvan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Frank Shute wrote:
>
> > About the only modern band I listen to nowadays is Blur, most of the
> > rest is overpriced effluent. Record sales going down because of
> > piracy? I think not.
>
> Yeah, seriously. I don't even go to record stores anymore. What's the
> point? While there's some stuff there I wouldn't mind having, it's a
> matter of buying an entire CD for one mildly interesting song, and the
> cheap CDs are $25 now. I don't have money to piss away like that.
>
> --
> Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
> http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/
>

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Silvan on 03/12/2003 7:06 PM

13/12/2003 7:37 PM

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:25:16 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>Larry Jaques wrote:
>
>> Very hard to choose, but probably a tie between "Obscured
>> by Clouds" and "Dark Side of the Moon".
>
>I like DSotM a good bit too, but it just doesn't do quite as much for me as
>some of their other albums. Probably because I never have learned to love
>"the Great Gag in the Sky" (That's a joke, Larry... Gag, as in horking,
>ralphing, spewing... I hate that song. Which probably means you think
>it's the best part of the whole album. :)

You mean the black vocalists in the background with the
full range of voice routine? Gags me, too.


>Add "Julia Dream" and "That Fat Old Sun" to that list.

I don't recall either, FWIW.


>I like "The Wall" but not as much as most people do, and anything after that
>is crap.

Agreed. The Wall was fun, but...


>> Of course, I liked Zappa and King Crimson, too.
>
>Titties and beer... What was that, "Baby Snakes?"

The technical excellence that was his band on Hot Rats.
(which one of my sister's friends left after a party and
never came back to get.

"I'm a little pimp with my hair gassed back."


>One of the few "real" songs I can play on the guitar too. I seldom try to
>play other people's music, so most people think I "can't play anything"
>until I break that one out.

I just picked up a violin and will be swinging cats shortly.
I've always loved Jean Luc Ponty and about any electric fiddle
or violin music. Wish me luck. (Oh, 'twas $26 on *b*y.)


>>>Actually, there were two or three good disco songs.
>>
>> No comment. <gag, kaff, choke>
>
>Well, come on, I grew up listening to the BeeGees. Mom was a big fan. Some
>of it rubbed off.

And some folks learn to beat women from their fathers.
Neither, in my definite opinion, is good, right, or fair.


>(Now, James Brown makes me want to say it loud that I'm black and I'm proud
>and get up offa that thang and I feel good. James Brown rocks, ba ba ba ba
>bum, yeah. It's not because I'm a white guy that I don't like rap.)

I'm not fond of screamers, no matter what race or gender, thanks.
But if you and he feels good, fine. Just don't make me listen to
any of it. (or Christmas music, R&B, disco, or rap)

(Oops, better add my violin practice to that. Got plugs & muffs?)

--
Save the Endangered ROAD NARROWS! -|- www.diversify.com
Ban SUVs today! -|- Full Service Websites

RS

Roy Smith

in reply to Silvan on 03/12/2003 7:06 PM

14/12/2003 7:22 PM

Usenet has been dying for 20 years. I expect it will continue to die
for the next 20 years.

fF

[email protected] (Frank Shute)

in reply to Silvan on 03/12/2003 7:06 PM

14/12/2003 10:20 AM

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:37:39 GMT, Larry Jaques wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:25:16 -0500, Silvan
><[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:
>
>>Larry Jaques wrote:
>>
>>> Very hard to choose, but probably a tie between "Obscured
>>> by Clouds" and "Dark Side of the Moon".
>>
>>I like DSotM a good bit too, but it just doesn't do quite as much for me as
>>some of their other albums. Probably because I never have learned to love
>>"the Great Gag in the Sky" (That's a joke, Larry... Gag, as in horking,
>>ralphing, spewing... I hate that song. Which probably means you think
>>it's the best part of the whole album. :)
>
> You mean the black vocalists in the background with the
> full range of voice routine? Gags me, too.

The "black vocalist" was a white girl: Clare Torry. Yes, I'm another
Floyd anorak ;) Saw them at Knebworth circa 1975.

About the only modern band I listen to nowadays is Blur, most of the
rest is overpriced effluent. Record sales going down because of
piracy? I think not.

<snip>

--

Frank

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

11/12/2003 6:44 PM

Tom Watson wrote:

>>Well, except for Pink Floyd.
>
> OBWW: "Careful with that axe, Eugene."

Yeah man. :)

(I said that to my boy a lot when I was teaching him how to use one.)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

BH

Brian Henderson

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

30/11/2003 2:34 AM

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:33:23 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:

>This wasn't an upgrade. Since they finally changed the case spec, I had to
>buy a new box, and all new components. I priced parts, determined that
>these people literally only cost a few dollars more (like $15-20) than
>buying parts mail order (after considering shipping vs. sales tax). It
>cost essentially nothing to have them put it all together, so I let them
>build the damn thing and that was that.

My point was that it would have cost me 2-3x more to buy an entirely
new system. One place quoted me $2200 for a computer that I built
myself for $500. A couple others couldn't even build the system I
wanted because they only used Intel chips and I wanted AMD.

>I've put together enough computers in my day that I take no joy in it
>anymore. Sort of like working on my car. Been there, done that, and if I
>could afford to pay a mechanic, I'd never touch the thing again. I'm
>definitely not a wrench jockey, and I'm not a computer hardware guy either.

I do most of my own work. I did my wife's rear brakes a week ago or
so for $40, which included pads and having both rotors resurfaced. It
took me about an hour. If I took it to the shop, they'd charge me
$200 and take 2 days.

Tell me which is better?

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Brian Henderson on 30/11/2003 2:34 AM

30/11/2003 10:19 AM

Brian Henderson writes:

>I do most of my own work. I did my wife's rear brakes a week ago or
>so for $40, which included pads and having both rotors resurfaced. It
>took me about an hour. If I took it to the shop, they'd charge me
>$200 and take 2 days.

Quit doing auto work when I had to reshoe the front brakes on a '67 Plymouth in
92 deg. weather. But we found one of the good points of WV: got the front
brakes on my wife's Dodge Stratus done, including turned rotors, for $78 not
long ago.

Charlie Self

"Say what you will about the ten commandments, you must always come back to the
pleasant fact that there are only ten of them." H. L. Mencken



















LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

12/12/2003 2:15 AM

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:49:27 -0600, Iraxl Enb <[email protected]>
brought forth from the murky depths:

>> More like the 1700s.
>>
>> Well, except for Pink Floyd. J. S. Bach and Pink Floyd. What a weirdo I
>> am.
>
>Floyd and ELP. And nothing else matters I guess...

I saw Keith Emerson spinning and playing 8' off the stage
wilst strapped to a piano bench and an electric grand piano
(or was that the MOOG?) at the Cal Jam. THE Cal Jam, not some
second string later concert. We were close enough to center
of the infield that the QUAD sound system worked.
</dating myself>


--------------------------------------------------------------------
I sent in my $5, so * http://www.diversify.com/stees.html
why haven't I been 'saved'? * Graphic Design - Humorous T-shirts

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

26/11/2003 9:33 PM

Brian Henderson wrote:

> Last time I did a complete upgrade, I went around and got some price
> quotes for the system if they installed it. The prices I got ended up
> being 2-3x as much as it cost me to just do it myself and that's not
> even counting the money I saved using perfectly good components that I
> already had. In the end, the labor costs far exceeded the hardware
> costs and I'm about the cheapest labor I know. ;)

This wasn't an upgrade. Since they finally changed the case spec, I had to
buy a new box, and all new components. I priced parts, determined that
these people literally only cost a few dollars more (like $15-20) than
buying parts mail order (after considering shipping vs. sales tax). It
cost essentially nothing to have them put it all together, so I let them
build the damn thing and that was that.

I've put together enough computers in my day that I take no joy in it
anymore. Sort of like working on my car. Been there, done that, and if I
could afford to pay a mechanic, I'd never touch the thing again. I'm
definitely not a wrench jockey, and I'm not a computer hardware guy either.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

11/12/2003 3:16 PM

Larry Jaques wrote:

> I've seen P.D.Q. Bach in concert (what a hoot) and still
> adore Pink Floyd.

A man of good taste then. What's your favorite album?

I guess I'd have to say mine is "Wish You Were Here," but it's not out front
by much.

> Much of today's music could be considered chamber pot music.
> Rap makes me miss disco.

Actually, there were two or three good disco songs. There might even be a
good country song. Rap/hip hop is the musical equivalent of bird cage
lining.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

BH

Brian Henderson

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

01/12/2003 9:47 PM

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:02:15 GMT, "mrdancer" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>The main reason I build my own systems (and those for my friends) is that I
>know what kind of components are going into the system. I can pick and
>choose my own quality power supply, heatsink, fans, etc. With a cheap
>eMachine system, you're getting a cheap POS power supply that will likely
>give you problems on your first upgrade or addition of a powered
>peripheral... that's a headache I don't need.

I'd be a complete pain at any system builder because I know exactly
what I want in my system. I know exactly what brand I want, exactly
what component I want and I won't take anything else. Most of them
try to use the least expensive parts and off-brands so they make more
profit but I want the top of the line. If I'm going to pay for it, I
want something that will last.

Easier and cheaper to do it myself.

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

02/12/2003 11:37 PM

Brian Henderson wrote:

>>greasy, rip open a few knuckles, make a big mess on my driveway, and not
>>have any time left over to do anything fun.
>
> If you know what you're doing, there's no mess and no ripped knuckles.
> A socket set, a pair of long-nose pliers and brake parts and you're
> done in an hour. No muss, no fuss.

Yeah, whatever you say, Chief. No fuss, no muss, sounds like you're a
freaking master mechanic for sure. Feel free to come by and do my brakes
any time you want. I guaran-damn-tee you that you won't get through a job
on one of *my* rust buckets in an hour. It'll probably take you that long
just to get a wheel off.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

03/12/2003 8:20 PM

ClydesdaleMTB wrote:

>
>>>Brian Henderson wrote:
>
>>>Yeah, whatever you say, Chief. No fuss, no muss, sounds like you're a
>>>freaking master mechanic for sure. Feel free to come by and do my brakes

> Sounds like your vehicles suffer from both your ham fisted mechanical
> skills as well as years of pitiful neglect.

Yeah, well, OK. I've thought about it a bit. I probably *do* suck at that
kind of stuff. I was snide because I was feeling defensive, but I really
don't have any *reason* to be defensive. The fact is, I just haven't done
that much car work. Four brake jobs in 15 years, three mufflers, a water
pump, a few valve cover gaskets, spark plugs, wires, etc.... I shouldn't
be expected to do any of these jobs in an hour because I haven't done
anything often enough to be quick and confident about it.

So I was a smartass without good reason, and I apologize to both of you and
anyone else who's thinking what an asshole I am about now.

I still stand by what I said originally though. I really don't enjoy car
work at all, and if I could afford to, I'd never fool with it again.

It's a PITA, a black hole for time, and yes, I invariably cut myself or bark
my knuckles on something. And yes, for that matter, I *am* clumsy. Clumsy
as hell. I always have been. I get defensive about it, but I can't help
it. My hands twitch, and I move with all the delicate grace of a
three-legged rhinoceros. I accomplish what I do in spite of these
limitations, and in the end I don't do too damn bad at all.

There's no shame in admitting I suck at auto mechanics. So there. I suck
at auto mechanics. I suck at sports too. Hooooo boy. Lucky for me, my
wife doesn't care about any of these things, which is why I'm not a
31-year-old virgin. There's hope even for dorks like me.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

mm

"mrdancer"

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

05/12/2003 3:47 PM

"Brian Henderson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:02:15 GMT, "mrdancer" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >The main reason I build my own systems (and those for my friends) is that
I
> >know what kind of components are going into the system. I can pick and
> >choose my own quality power supply, heatsink, fans, etc. With a cheap
> >eMachine system, you're getting a cheap POS power supply that will likely
> >give you problems on your first upgrade or addition of a powered
> >peripheral... that's a headache I don't need.
>
> I'd be a complete pain at any system builder because I know exactly
> what I want in my system. I know exactly what brand I want, exactly
> what component I want and I won't take anything else. Most of them
> try to use the least expensive parts and off-brands so they make more
> profit but I want the top of the line. If I'm going to pay for it, I
> want something that will last.
>
> Easier and cheaper to do it myself.

Here's another compelling reason to build your own:
Test
http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1927&p=1

Summary
http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1927&p=18

Here's a quote:
"The Pentium III based Celerons offered, at one time, acceptable
performance. However, it is clear that in the value segment today, Intel has
nothing to offer but a high clock speed. AnandTech readers will know to stay
away from the Celeron at all costs; however, what is troublesome are the
number of retail customers who are faced with the decision between a higher
priced 2.6GHz Celeron system and an Athlon XP 2200+. We would highly
encourage system vendors like Compaq and eMachines to shift their low-end
focus to AMD if their customers are of any importance at all. As we've seen
through our extensive benchmarking, the Celeron's performance is truly
dismal; so while Intel is quite competitive in the mid-range and high-end
segments, their value processors are inexcusably slow compared to AMD."
End Quote.

Most folks who don't know any better will always choose the Pentium
(Celeron), not knowing the amount of performance they are giving up.

Then there are the overclocking guys (another compelling reason to build
your own). With quality components and a few changes in the BIOS, a lot of
guys are running the AMD Barton 2500+ (1.83Ghz) processor at an actual
2.2Ghz, which would put it on par with a Pentium4 3.0Ghz chip. The Barton
chip is $86 and the P4 chip is $268 (ref: newegg.com). $182 more for equal
performance!

st

"solarman"

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

03/12/2003 8:50 PM

We got "skills" man....SKILLS... I always loved the look of
someone who couldn't figure out where all the wires and hoses
go....and then we put them all back in a couple of minutes...

"Silvan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Tim Douglass wrote:
>
> > Since I have an air compressor for my nail guns I bought an
impact
> > wrench last Spring. That is far and away the best tool I've
ever
>
> Wouldn't do me any good since it would just wrench the studs off
anyway. :)
>
> > bought for mechanical work. I've added an air ratchet to it as
well.
> > Wish I'd had those 20 years ago when I was doing lots of work
on cars.
> > Back then buddy and I once changed the clutch on his hot rod
in about
> > 2 hours, which isn't too bad when you consider it required
removing
> > and reinstalling the engine.
>
> If it was an old car 20 years ago, it was probably relatively
easy to pull
> the engine. People from the '60s back had it made. Nowadays
it's hard to
> even *find* the engine under all the wires and hoses.
>
> Still, that's pretty impressive!
>
> --
> Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan
<[email protected]>
> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user
#243621
> http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/
>

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

04/12/2003 2:45 AM

solarman wrote:

> We got "skills" man....SKILLS... I always loved the look of
> someone who couldn't figure out where all the wires and hoses
> go....and then we put them all back in a couple of minutes...

I'll bet. That's one I've never had any real desire to do, even back when I
was thinking of myself as a car guy.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

MR

Mark

in reply to Silvan on 24/11/2003 6:44 PM

12/12/2003 2:52 AM



Larry Jaques wrote:

> I saw Keith Emerson spinning and playing 8' off the stage
> wilst strapped to a piano bench and an electric grand piano
> (or was that the MOOG?) at the Cal Jam. THE Cal Jam, not some
> second string later concert. We were close enough to center
> of the infield that the QUAD sound system worked.
> </dating myself>


I think I saw that on Don Kirshner's Rock Concert. ??

That had to have been over thirty years ago.


There's been some good music composed after the 18th century. Just not a
whole lot recently.


--

Mark

N.E. Ohio


Never argue with a fool, a bystander can't tell you apart. (S. Clemens,
A.K.A. Mark Twain)

When in doubt hit the throttle. It may not help but it sure ends the
suspense. (Gaz, r.moto)

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tim Douglass on 24/11/2003 11:53 AM

25/11/2003 9:21 AM

B a r r y B u r k e J r . wrote:

> For my buck, a $500 computer does all I need. This consists of light

Yeah, me too, and then some. I guess if a 2.7 GHz deal is a $500 computer
now, mine is worth $50.

> I don't do pro video editing or anything like that. I play games on
> my $200 PS2. <G>

Me too, though I rarely even play games on that. I haven't had it plugged
in since May or so.

> My last two machines were $3k.

I paid $1300 for this one. Probably closer to $2,000 for the P166 before
it. That one is still in use too, as a dedicated X terminal. I can't see
needing faster for a diskless workstation, so I'm probably going to buy it
a new power supply to keep it running a few more years. The power supply
in that thing dates back to when I was in high school, and it's getting
tired.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 25/11/2003 9:21 AM

25/11/2003 3:28 PM

Silvan states:

>needing faster for a diskless workstation, so I'm probably going to buy it
>a new power supply to keep it running a few more years. The power supply
>in that thing dates back to when I was in high school, and it's getting
>tired.

Last year? Seriously, if it will work, I've got an almost unused Enright
(HPC-250-101) that is just taking up space. Pay the shipping and it's yours.

Charlie Self

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would
promise them missionaries for dinner." H. L. Mencken


















Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 25/11/2003 9:21 AM

25/11/2003 6:25 PM

Charlie Self wrote:

> Last year? Seriously, if it will work, I've got an almost unused Enright

Feels like it was about 500 million years ago, but I graduated from high
school in 1990. The power supply is probably from 1987 or so.

> (HPC-250-101) that is just taking up space. Pay the shipping and it's
> yours.

I have no idea what that particular power supply is, but if it fits an
AT-style case I'll be glad to take you up on that! :)

After the holidays though, probably. The power supply is low priority, and
money is distressingly tight right now. Had some unexpected and unwelcome
expenses, and SWMBO's work box is right out the window. So too probably my
scroll saw.

I feel another rant about shitty health insurance coming on, so I'd better
shut up. Appreciate the offer though, just bad timing right now...

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 25/11/2003 6:25 PM

26/11/2003 12:39 AM

Silvan notes:

>> (HPC-250-101) that is just taking up space. Pay the shipping and it's
>> yours.
>
>I have no idea what that particular power supply is, but if it fits an
>AT-style case I'll be glad to take you up on that! :)
>
>After the holidays though, probably. The power supply is low priority, and
>money is distressingly tight right now. Had some unexpected and unwelcome
>expenses, and SWMBO's work box is right out the window. So too probably my
>scroll saw.

No rush. See if Enright has a site and see if that model will fit your machine.
It should, I think.

Charlie Self

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would
promise them missionaries for dinner." H. L. Mencken


















mm

"mrdancer"

in reply to Silvan on 25/11/2003 6:25 PM

26/11/2003 3:11 PM

"Charlie Self" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Silvan notes:
>
> >> (HPC-250-101) that is just taking up space. Pay the shipping and it's
> >> yours.
> >
> >I have no idea what that particular power supply is, but if it fits an
> >AT-style case I'll be glad to take you up on that! :)
> >
> >After the holidays though, probably. The power supply is low priority,
and
> >money is distressingly tight right now. Had some unexpected and
unwelcome
> >expenses, and SWMBO's work box is right out the window. So too probably
my
> >scroll saw.
>
> No rush. See if Enright has a site and see if that model will fit your
machine.
> It should, I think.

Might be a little tricky if you search for Enright, since it is actually
Enlight. ;-)

Here're a coupla links that show the PSU:
http://www.highpowersupply.com/product-ps-hpc250101r.htm
http://www.thirty-day.com/hpc250101.htm

Enlights are decent power supplies. So are Fortron and Sparkle. If you
have the cash, it's hard to beat Antec and Enermax, and the Thermaltake
units are nice, also.

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to "mrdancer" on 26/11/2003 3:11 PM

26/11/2003 3:22 PM

mrdancer responds:

>Here're a coupla links that show the PSU:
>http://www.highpowersupply.com/product-ps-hpc250101r.htm
>http://www.thirty-day.com/hpc250101.htm
>
>Enlights are decent power supplies. So are Fortron and Sparkle. If you
>have the cash, it's hard to beat Antec and Enermax, and the Thermaltake
>units are nice, also.
>
Thanks for the correction. Silvan is kind of short of money, so...anything that
works. This is out of a case that got messed up somehow, without affecting
anything else (no MB at the time). I was going to give it to a local outfit,
but he probably needs it more.

Charlie Self

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would
promise them missionaries for dinner." H. L. Mencken


















Sd

Silvan

in reply to "mrdancer" on 26/11/2003 3:11 PM

27/11/2003 1:19 AM

Charlie Self wrote:

> Thanks for the correction. Silvan is kind of short of money, so...anything
> that works. This is out of a case that got messed up somehow, without

Kind of short of money. I'm down to $3 now. Whee ha!

I'll look you up maybe when I get my Christmas bonus. Can't be *that*
expensive to ship it, but probably more than I can spare right now.

Sure do appreciate it. One day I'm going to stop being broke. Sure would
help if my family would just make up their minds to stop getting sick
already. Been working for me for the last three or five or seven years or
something. :)

(I feel another insurance rant coming on, so I'll shut up again.)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

BH

Bob Haar

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 8:06 PM

On 2003/11/22 4:26 PM, "Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> as though they couldn't be bothered.

I think that you have to look at it from the business perspective of the
ISPs. What they are seeing is that fewer and fewer of their new customers
are using Usenet, or even know of it. Hence the ISPs get relatively few
requests for Usenet news group access. When Comcast took over the @Home
market here, they did not seem to have any plans to support Usenet until
there was a significant outcry from existing customers.

For people who have come to the use of computers in the last five years, the
Internet is the same as the Web. They have no idea of how many other
services can ride over the basic bit transport of the Internet. And as more
services, such as email, are web-ified, we lose some of the distinctive
nature of services such as email, list servers and Usenet news groups.

The other factor which may be causing ISPs to consider dropping Usenet
service is the danger of legal action for intellectual property violations.
Let's be honest here. Many of the binary newsgroups are rampant with pirated
software, music, video and images. Every time some idiot posts a copyrighted
work without permission, every carrier and server that transports that post
faces some risk of legal action. The ISPs may not be held liable, but even
the threat of having to mount a legal defense in court is daunting to risk
adverse corporations.

If you are worried about the health of Usenet, do two things - let you ISP
know how important it is to you and introduce some other people to the
wonders on news group resources.


sS

[email protected] (Scott Lurndal)

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 9:13 PM

Larry Blanchard <[email protected]> writes:
>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] says...
>> aHR0cDovL3dlYi5hcmNoaXZlLm9yZy93ZWIvMTk5NjEwMTkyMjE5MjEvaHR0cDovL3d3dy5ib2Fy
>> ZHdhdGNoLmNvbS8NCg0KDQoiVG9tIFdhdHNvbiIgPHRqd2F0c29uQENMVUVUT0tFTi5zbmlwLm5l
>> dD4gd3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZSBuZXdzOmVhZjRmMDkyNTg4Nzk1NjZjNzdjMTYyM2ZkYmQ3YzA4
>
><snip>
>
>Why am I getting this? It seems from the replies that others are getting
>readable text. Is this some format that Gravity doesn't support?
>

More microsoft idiocy.

Base64-encoding ISO-8859-1 (standard Latin of which USASCII is a
subset) text.

HDR> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
HDR> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
HDR> X-Priority: 3
HDR> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
HDR> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
HDR> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

In particular, note the Content-Tranfer-Encoding. Stupid microsoft.

scott

LG

"Lee Gordon"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 12:25 PM

George ...

<<Not sure how many converts I made, but I was
shocked to see no one was using this great resource. (But then again, most
of these kids don't even know how to get around in DOS ;-)) >>

It won't be too long before you'll be getting rooms full of kids who've
never heard of DOS. <g>

Lee

--
To e-mail, replace "bucketofspam" with "dleegordon"

KV

"Ken Vaughn"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 10:43 PM

"Nova" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> <snip>
>
> My next door neighbor works "network tech support" (internal to the
> company) for Adelphia Cable. Prior to me showing him what "UseNet" was,
> he didn't even know it existed. I suspect it is the same with many of the
> "kids" working for various ISP's.
>

Boy, does that sound familiar. I have used 5 or 6 ISP's in as many years,
and I have frequently had to tell customer support what USENET was. The
better ISP's use more than one news feed, which helps with the missing posts
problem. I have frequently complained about Earthlink newsgroup service,
but in all fairness I have seen a dramatic improvement since they
implemented new servers and split their subscriber base into two groups,
East and West. Message retention seems to be longer, as well.

I do believe that the number of ISP subscribers which use USENET is low,
probably less than 5%, maybe even less.
--
Ken Vaughn
Visit My Workshop: http://home.earthlink.net/~kvaughn65/

GM

"George M. Kazaka"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 9:30 PM

HUH!!! Went right over my head
"Silvan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> George M. Kazaka wrote:
>
> > When I came on here i actually joined a woodwork listserv, I was getting
> > all the e-mails from this group but when i posted no one got them, I
never
> > found out where they went
> > I still do not understand how this newsgroup goes to the listserv but it
> > is based in Indianna.
>
> You were getting *posts* from this group. Slight difference.
>
> It's pretty common for it to run the other way. There's a linux kernel
> newsgroup that echoes the contents of the mailing list, but posts to the
> newsgroup do not go to the list. What you're seeing is the same thing in
> reverse. They doubtless set it up that way on purpose, and nothing is
> broken.
>
> --
> Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
> http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/
>

CJ

Charles Jones

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 12:49 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Better now?

Yes!

> I really hate Microsoft....

Ditto

CharlesJ
--
========================================================================
Charles Jones | Works at HP, | email: [email protected]
Hewlett-Packard | doesn't speak | ICQ: 29610755
Loveland, Colorado | for HP | AIM: LovelandCharles
USA | |Jabber: [email protected]

BD

"Bob Davis"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 3:57 AM

I don't see that problem at all, but maybe its because I live in a big city.
Earthlink is my ISP and they just put in large East and West servers just to
handle newgroups. The performance improvement was huge. They obviously
believe Newsgroups are important for their customers. I highly recommend
them.

Bob

MJ

"Mark Jerde"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 11:37 PM

Lee K wrote:

> Try this site:
> http://news.individual.net/
>
> It's a usenet server based in Germany that is very reliable, fast,
> and free. You can still keep your current access via your ISP and use
> this as a back-up, or, do as I do and use it all the time, since it
> is much more reliable than most ISP access is.

One bummer:

http://news.individual.net/faq.html#5.3

5.3 May I mangle my "From:" header address so that I do not get SPAM?

No. We recommend to get an account with a free e-mail provider (such as
GMX, Yahoo, Hotmail, Bigfoot...) and to not read mails that go to that
address at all, only sporadically or in combination with suitable filter
mechanisms.
This has the same effect, but does not violate the netiquette, our policy or
other guidelines.
Another way is the usage of "[email protected]". The owner of privacy.net has
given his permission to use that address for SPAM protection purposes.

-- Mark


ss

"solarman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 9:18 PM
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ss

"solarman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 9:04 PM
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HR

"Howard Ruttan"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 10:02 AM


"Tom Watson" wrote ...
> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore." <snip for brevity>

I wouldn't be surprised if the recent growth in number and type of these PHP
MySQL based forum web sites (like sawmillcreek.org) and other forums like
woodcentral.com began stealing people away from USENET. Younger people seem
to prefer them. The tech types that run them like to play with pretty
colors and emoticons so they are a lot flashier and, being web based, may be
easier to find for the computer challenged. I don't think they will kill
off USENET but the ISP's will continue to ignore it and save $$$, favoring
the forums because they don't have to worry about monitoring abuse and troll
activity - the web site owner will have to do that. Simplifies their job
and saves money.

--

Cheers,
Howard

----------------------------------------------------------
Working wood in New Jersey - [email protected]
Visit me in the woodshop - www.inthewoodshop.org

sS

[email protected] (Scott Lurndal)

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 9:10 PM

"solarman" <[email protected]> writes:
>UGlwICYgc3RhdCB3ZXJlIHRoZSB3b3JkcyBvZiB0aGUgZGF5IHRoZW4uLi4uIEJpbGwgR2F0ZXMg
>d2FzIHN0aWxsIHdldCBiZWhpbmQgdGhlIGVhcnMuLi4NCg0KDQoiVG9tIFdhdHNvbiIgPHRqd2F0
>c29uQENMVUVUT0tFTi5zbmlwLm5ldD4gd3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZSBuZXdzOmI1NzFlNTU4YTVi
>MzIzMzY3YWJlODEzZmNiZjk5NWZhQG5ld3MudGVyYW5ld3MuY29tLi4uDQo+IE9uIFNhdCwgMjIg
>Tm92IDIwMDMgMjA6NDQ6NTUgLTA1MDAsICJzb2xhcm1hbiINCj4gPHNhbGVzdGVybWl0ZUBsZWFk
>ZXJzYnlleGFtcGxlLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+IA0KPiA+SSByZW1lbWJlci4uLi4uIFhlcm94IDgy
>MC1JSSBDUE0gbWFjaGluZS4uLiBBaC4uIG5vdyB0aGVtIHdhcyB0aGUgZGF5cyENCj4gDQo+IE1p
>bmUgd2VyZSBhIFRlbGV2aWRlbyBDUG0sIG1pdCBEb2xsaWVzICh0d2luIGZsb3BwaWVzKS4NCj4g
>DQo+IEhhcmQgZHJpdmVzIGtlcHQgaW4gYWlyIGNvbmRpdGlvbmVkIGx1eHVyeSBieSBmb2xrcyBm
>YXIgcmljaGVyIHRoYW4gaQ0KPiANCj4gSSBkaW5uYSBtaXNzIHRoYXQgV29yZHN0YXIgdi4xDQo+
>IA0KPiBBbHRobyBJIHdhcyBzbWl0dGVuIGJ5IHN1Y2ggdGVzdG9uZXJvbmljIGNvbW1hbmRzIGFz
>DQo+IA0KPiAnZ2xvYmFsIHNlYXJjaCBhbmQgZGVzdHJveScNCj4gDQo+IHllIGdhZHoNCj4gDQo+
>IA0KPiBSZWdhcmRzLCBUb20NCj4gVGhvbWFzIEouIFdhdHNvbi1DYWJpbmV0bWFrZXINCj4gR3Vs
>cGggTWlsbHMsIFBlbm5zeWx2YW5pYQ0KPiBodHRwOi8vdXNlcnMuc25pcC5uZXQvfnRqd2F0c29u
>

Hey solar man. Fix your newsreader. You're illegible to us unix types.

Mm

McQualude

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 4:55 AM

Tom Watson <[email protected]> said:

>
> Why this attitude by the ISP's?

Usenet is used by only a small percentage of total internet users.
The binary groups consume a majority of an ISP's bandwidth, hence
they begrudgingly support them.
--
McQualude

ss

"solarman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 4:21 PM

That is Geek Code.... you have to decypher it first before you can read
it... (My settings in Outlook Express got off)

"Larry Blanchard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
> >
aHR0cDovL3dlYi5hcmNoaXZlLm9yZy93ZWIvMTk5NjEwMTkyMjE5MjEvaHR0cDovL3d3dy5ib2Fy
> >
ZHdhdGNoLmNvbS8NCg0KDQoiVG9tIFdhdHNvbiIgPHRqd2F0c29uQENMVUVUT0tFTi5zbmlwLm5l
> >
dD4gd3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZSBuZXdzOmVhZjRmMDkyNTg4Nzk1NjZjNzdjMTYyM2ZkYmQ3YzA4
>
> <snip>
>
> Why am I getting this? It seems from the replies that others are getting
> readable text. Is this some format that Gravity doesn't support?
>
> --
> Where ARE those Iraqi WMDs?

ss

"solarman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 4:32 PM

Better now? I really hate Microsoft....

"Scott Lurndal" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "solarman" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>UGlwICYgc3RhdCB3ZXJlIHRoZSB3b3JkcyBvZiB0aGUgZGF5IHRoZW4uLi4uIEJpbGwgR2F0ZXM
g
>
>d2FzIHN0aWxsIHdldCBiZWhpbmQgdGhlIGVhcnMuLi4NCg0KDQoiVG9tIFdhdHNvbiIgPHRqd2F
0
>
>c29uQENMVUVUT0tFTi5zbmlwLm5ldD4gd3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZSBuZXdzOmI1NzFlNTU4YTV
i
>
>MzIzMzY3YWJlODEzZmNiZjk5NWZhQG5ld3MudGVyYW5ld3MuY29tLi4uDQo+IE9uIFNhdCwgMjI
g
>
>Tm92IDIwMDMgMjA6NDQ6NTUgLTA1MDAsICJzb2xhcm1hbiINCj4gPHNhbGVzdGVybWl0ZUBsZWF
k
>
>ZXJzYnlleGFtcGxlLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+IA0KPiA+SSByZW1lbWJlci4uLi4uIFhlcm94IDg
y
>
>MC1JSSBDUE0gbWFjaGluZS4uLiBBaC4uIG5vdyB0aGVtIHdhcyB0aGUgZGF5cyENCj4gDQo+IE1
p
>
>bmUgd2VyZSBhIFRlbGV2aWRlbyBDUG0sIG1pdCBEb2xsaWVzICh0d2luIGZsb3BwaWVzKS4NCj4
g
>
>DQo+IEhhcmQgZHJpdmVzIGtlcHQgaW4gYWlyIGNvbmRpdGlvbmVkIGx1eHVyeSBieSBmb2xrcyB
m
>
>YXIgcmljaGVyIHRoYW4gaQ0KPiANCj4gSSBkaW5uYSBtaXNzIHRoYXQgV29yZHN0YXIgdi4xDQo
+
>
>IA0KPiBBbHRobyBJIHdhcyBzbWl0dGVuIGJ5IHN1Y2ggdGVzdG9uZXJvbmljIGNvbW1hbmRzIGF
z
>
>DQo+IA0KPiAnZ2xvYmFsIHNlYXJjaCBhbmQgZGVzdHJveScNCj4gDQo+IHllIGdhZHoNCj4gDQo
+
>
>IA0KPiBSZWdhcmRzLCBUb20NCj4gVGhvbWFzIEouIFdhdHNvbi1DYWJpbmV0bWFrZXINCj4gR3V
s
>
>cGggTWlsbHMsIFBlbm5zeWx2YW5pYQ0KPiBodHRwOi8vdXNlcnMuc25pcC5uZXQvfnRqd2F0c29
u
> >
>
> Hey solar man. Fix your newsreader. You're illegible to us unix types.

MJ

"Mark Jerde"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 12:26 AM

Tom Watson wrote:

> What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
> claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
> what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?

How much of the problem is that all the newsreads I'm familar with are:
- Somewhat feature-free.
- Hard to set up.

Perhaps a newsreader as easy to use as MS Word, that handled:
- Deleting obvious porn.
- Synchronized input from multiple news servers.
- On the user's choice, deleted all multi posts
would be successful, and would help increase the popularity of newsgroups.

Going to HTML format by default may help too... <g>

-- Mark

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 11:18 PM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:49:58 GMT, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:

>AAMOF, it is getting so bad that I sometimes fancy you may eventually see
>some of the older, pre-Internet networks, like FidoNet, rear their heads
>again.

Aye, Cry Havoc and Release the Dogs of War!

(i thought fidonet was still extant)

Shall we all become eunuchs (shame on ye tommy, 'tis Unix that spells
it) again?

(tom's ready to fire up his old 2400 baud modem and ride to bbs
battle)


Regards, Tom
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Pn

Phisherman

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 12:23 AM

I don't see Usenet dying at all. It is an expense to maintain Usenet
servers, so to cut costs some ISPs don't offer them or only offer a
small subset. I use AT&T because they carry a full set of newsgroups
and have been very reliable.

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 12:23 PM

George wrote:

> Spoken like an urban type. For some, there is a single choice. Or pay
> distance charges.

An urban type... That's sort of funny.

I guess comparatively speaking, maybe, but I wouldn't characterize this as
an urban area.

I think the main factor here is that we got into technology early.
Supposedly the Blacksburg Electronic Village project was the very first one
to open the doors of the internet to the general public. After a couple
years of state-sponsored $6 internet, they talked a pair of companies into
starting ISPs, and kicked all the non-university types off the BEV.

We had ISPs back in 1993, and I don't think very many places did back then.
Definitely not many (or not any) places as rural in nature as this one.
(I'm still with the same ISP I signed up with after getting kicked off the
BEV, incidentally. My first provider was Radford University, then the BEV,
and then these guys for the past 10 or so years.)

> You think any of the kids understand the Windows modem icon? I remember
> my 300 had the top molded to mate comfortably with a standard desk set, as

Sounds like you'd lump me in with the "kids." So yes, I do. We had one of
those things when I was a wee lad, but I never used it for much. When I
got into BBSing in about middle school, it was via a PC with an internal
1200 baud modem. Dad used the 300 baud acoustic coupler deal for work,
from a Heathkit dumb terminal.

He might still have it. Should I try to sell it on eBay? :)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Silvan on 23/11/2003 12:23 PM

23/11/2003 6:10 PM

Silvan writes:

>> Spoken like an urban type. For some, there is a single choice. Or pay
>> distance charges.
>
>An urban type... That's sort of funny.
>
>I guess comparatively speaking, maybe, but I wouldn't characterize this as
>an urban area.

Oh, I dunno. Except I did get a good whiff of the barns as I ran the bypass
this morning.

Compared to my area of Bedford, you're urban. Compared to Bedford service,
you're urban. It's going to cost me $99 a month for a damned satellite hook-up,
which essentially means I'm staying with a phone modem for the foreseeable
future unless I hit the lottery.

>He might still have it. Should I try to sell it on eBay? :)

Hey, especially if you've got the box. All kidding aside, but it on with NR,
but a 10 buck starting bid and see what happens.




Charlie Self

"I am not worried about the deficit. It is big enough to take care of itself. "
Ronald Reagan

















Sd

Silvan

in reply to Silvan on 23/11/2003 12:23 PM

24/11/2003 1:01 AM

Charlie Self wrote:

>>I guess comparatively speaking, maybe, but I wouldn't characterize this as
>>an urban area.
>
> Oh, I dunno. Except I did get a good whiff of the barns as I ran the
> bypass this morning.

Yeah, lotsa urban cow pastures around here.

> Compared to my area of Bedford, you're urban. Compared to Bedford service,

We're the second most urban area in southwestern Virginia, I'd say. We're
quickly turning into Roanoke's bedroom. They closed the police academy and
started sending cops to Salem to learn urban warfare tactics.

Yeah, I guess we're becoming urban. :(

> you're urban. It's going to cost me $99 a month for a damned satellite
> hook-up, which essentially means I'm staying with a phone modem for the
> foreseeable future unless I hit the lottery.

Yeah, well, wah. :) I can't afford broadband either. I don't have that
many options for that matter. Adelphia cable or modem. No DSL (ever), and
I can't use that satellite stuff either since I don't run Windows.

I'm used to it though. I've never used broadband except at my kids' school.
Sad when my web page loads faster off the net than it does off my own damn
hard drive. Those kids are spoiled. Won't even use the computer at home,
because it's too slow.

>>He might still have it. Should I try to sell it on eBay? :)
>
> Hey, especially if you've got the box. All kidding aside, but it on with
> NR, but a 10 buck starting bid and see what happens.

I can't sell anything on eBay anyway. My finances are a mess, and I don't
have any open credit accounts. Last time I checked, you had to have a
credit card so they could take their commission. I don't have that much to
sell anyway.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:49 AM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:44:55 -0500, "solarman"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I remember..... Xerox 820-II CPM machine... Ah.. now them was the days!

Mine were a Televideo CPm, mit Dollies (twin floppies).

Hard drives kept in air conditioned luxury by folks far richer than i

I dinna miss that Wordstar v.1

Altho I was smitten by such testoneronic commands as

'global search and destroy'

ye gadz


Regards, Tom
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 1:18 AM

[email protected] wrote:

> Most websites that claim to have free clipart are more likely to lockup
> your computer with popup ads then deliver the goods.
> But the usenet binary clipart group is still going strong.

Lock up your computer with popup adds? Yeesh. I sure don't miss Windows.

I haven't seen a popup in years, and my computer hasn't locked up since I
finally figured out and tweaked a BIOS setting around 18 months ago or so.

I miss the games sometimes though. Linux games universally suck.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 3:51 AM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 21:26:57 GMT, Tom Watson
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
>that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."

That's absolutely false. Hell, you _alone_ have responded to
at least 50 trolls on this group this month. Your 1/2 dozen
troll-responding buddies did the same. <glare>


>My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
>complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
>their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
>as though they couldn't be bothered.

I think it's a burden to handle all the traffic so they
say it's dying and just don't service it like they should.
Switch ISPs, then stick with a good one.


--------------------------------------
PESSIMIST: An optimist with experience
--------------------------------------------
www.diversify.com - Web Database Development

LK

"Lee K"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 6:32 PM


"Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
> claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
> what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
>

Try this site:
http://news.individual.net/

It's a usenet server based in Germany that is very reliable, fast, and free.
You can still keep your current access via your ISP and use this as a
back-up, or, do as I do and use it all the time, since it is much more
reliable than most ISP access is.

LB

Larry Blanchard

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 10:15 AM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Same deal with the University of Berlin server I was talking about a bit
> ago. That sounds like maybe the same thing by a different name. (Maybe
> they've changed the name.)
>
Correct. It is the same server. Great free newsfeed of non-binary
groups.

--
Where ARE those Iraqi WMDs?

LB

Larry Blanchard

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 10:18 AM

In article <xFRvb.210817$ao4.750180@attbi_s51>,
[email protected] says...
> The vast majority of people that I talk to have never heard of Usenet.
>
I'm not surprised. About 5 years ago I helped my brother-in-law set up
his computer and hook up to a local ISP. When I asked the ISP about
newsgroups, he said that indeed he provided Usenet, but he never told any
customers about it unless they knew enough to ask him!

--
Where ARE those Iraqi WMDs?

LB

Larry Blanchard

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 10:19 AM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> aHR0cDovL3dlYi5hcmNoaXZlLm9yZy93ZWIvMTk5NjEwMTkyMjE5MjEvaHR0cDovL3d3dy5ib2Fy
> ZHdhdGNoLmNvbS8NCg0KDQoiVG9tIFdhdHNvbiIgPHRqd2F0c29uQENMVUVUT0tFTi5zbmlwLm5l
> dD4gd3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZSBuZXdzOmVhZjRmMDkyNTg4Nzk1NjZjNzdjMTYyM2ZkYmQ3YzA4

<snip>

Why am I getting this? It seems from the replies that others are getting
readable text. Is this some format that Gravity doesn't support?

--
Where ARE those Iraqi WMDs?

LB

Larry Blanchard

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 3:29 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
>
> I think so many newsgroups have been taken over by spammers and
> hatemongers, it's tough to waste so much time wading through the muck.
> This newsgroup has been better than average but there are dozens of
> others that have succumbed. Everywhere you go, it's porn, spam, get
> rich quick schemes, JUNK. It's not hard to understand why users have
> been leaving in droves.
>
But it's so simple to filter out most of that. Assuming your newsserver
doesn't. The one from Berlin (uni-berlin.de) gets rid of most of the
porn stuff, leaving me to filter out the trolls. Not difficult.


--
Where ARE those Iraqi WMDs?

KC

"Keith Carlson"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 5:23 AM

"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The format of UseNet is what is so attractive to me ... I just like using
my
> e-mail client to participate and never cared a tinker's damn for web based
> forums.
>
> However, I participated in an e-book forum for a number of years using a
> list server and it was almost like being on UseNet, as the _comfort_ of
your
> e-mail client was preserved.
>
> I would not be adverse to trying it again.
>

I wonder how many don't care for web forums? One big advantage would be to
have a moderated forum. Be able to block random posters by requiring
registration, and being able to step in when a thread gets out of hand.

Usenet still has its place. IIRC, the original reason for Usenet was to give
a forum for open expression, especially for politics and other controversial
subjects.

Hard to see how a woodworking group needs that freedom of expression,
though.

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 10:04 PM

Tom Watson wrote:

> Why this attitude by the ISP's?

Usnet mostly appeals to us old guys who were on the net back before the web
came into being. I'd wager that the vast majority of ISPs are run by
people who got into the computer scene late in the game, after the AOL
revolution. These are people who are helpless if they can't point and
click their way around a problem.

My own is no exception either. They really don't have a clue, and I'd wager
they probably don't understand half of the things I use my connection to
do. I'm totally beyond the realm of their tech support drones anyway
because I run a Linux box. Boy, you should hear them babble pathetic
excuses to me when I say the L word. :)

> However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
> when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
> their system does not pick up the posts.

I get your posts. My primary server is at the University of Berlin. They
give free accounts to anyone who's willing to abide by their very
reasonable rules. It's the best free news server I've found, but even
using that one and two others, I still frequently miss original posts.

>what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?

Not fool-proof, but the best way I've found is to have multiple upstream
servers. I'm not sure how you might go about doing that without running
your own news spool, but you can run your own spool even on Windows.
Something called Hamster I think. I know little about it, other than it's
"the closest thing to Leafnode Windows has."

I have a crontab run fetchnews every 15 minutes, if I'm online. It pulls
articles from my three upstream sources, then stores them on my hard drive.
I connect to my own server and get the articles instantly. Posts go out
every 15 minutes. I can also run fetchnews manually if I have some
immediate need, such as sending out the last round of posts before going to
bed, or starting the fetch as soon as I get home from work. It's a good
way to go for a modem user too, since I don't have to wait for the
individual articles to download. Once I'm reading, I'm reading; any
waiting is up front.

The only down side of doing it this way is if you read a lot of groups.
Fetchnews doesn't let you at any of the new stuff until the whole run is
done, and if you subscribe to a couple dozen groups, it takes a good bit of
time to finish (by modem anyway.) I tend to only read one or two at a
time, so this is no problem. I can always connect to the upstream servers
directly if I have some need to read a group to which I don't normally
subscribe. KNode makes that easy.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 10:38 AM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:49:10 GMT, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Or 'Pirates', on the TI ... before the PC came along.

I still have my original TI-99/4a and almost every piece of software ever
issued for it, EXCEPT the Milton Bradley EU that allowed voice controlled
games.
Yep voice controlled games over 20 years ago.

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 10:49 PM

To paraphrase your own recent words, what you are now getting in Internet
access from the corporate ISP model currently in vogue is more sizzle and
less steak.

It is not UseNet that is dying, it is the technical competence required to
run an ISP, with all the attendant services like nntp, that has become a
victim of the general corporate incompetence in this country.

The attitude you remark upon has become prevalent as the smaller local
ISP's, which were plentiful during the early days of the Internet, have been
replaced with these large, corporate ISP's.

Many of the current problems can be traced directly to the technical
incompetence that results from hiring inexperienced IT personnel in order to
make the bottom line more attractive. Corporate ISP's like AT&T (one of the
VERY worst as far as technical competence is concerned, IMNSHO) try make it
easy on themselves with self-serving justifications for doing away with the
services we came to expect as part of the ISP package not all that long ago.

Those services that they can't outright do away with (yet) they reluctantly
continue to provide, but at reduced levels, and with none of the required
technical expertise to do the job well.

As a partner in a small Internet company, I deal with the situation on a
daily basis, spending increasingly more time wading through self serving
corporate directives aimed at justifying technical shortcuts, and arguing,
on behalf of our clients, with increasingly incompetent technical personnel
who are barely conversant with the basic underpinnings of the Internet.

AAMOF, it is getting so bad that I sometimes fancy you may eventually see
some of the older, pre-Internet networks, like FidoNet, rear their heads
again.

On second thought, there soon may be no one left competent enough to do even
that again.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03


"Tom Watson" wrote in message
> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> as though they couldn't be bothered.
>
> This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
> subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
> condition.
>
> When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
> active groups.
>
> Why this attitude by the ISP's?
>
> I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
> ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
> but is often down.
>
> However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
> when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
> their system does not pick up the posts.
>
> I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
> of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
> on Google.
>
> What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
> claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
> what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
>
>
> Regards, Tom
> Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
> Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
> http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 12:26 PM

George Gibeau wrote:

> shocked to see no one was using this great resource. (But then again, most
> of these kids don't even know how to get around in DOS ;-))

Good riddance to DOS anyway. I used to love DOS, but then I discovered
Linux. Bash kicks ass! I can't stand to be at a DOS prompt anymore.

(Of course, I'm not one of those people who's helpless without the pointy
clickie thingie working. I've just graduated to a *real* command line
interface. :)

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

MJ

"Mark Jerde"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 12:26 AM

Mark Jerde wrote:

> How much of the problem is that all the newsreads I'm familar with

Grrrr.... For "newsreads" read "newsreaders"

-- Mark

MJ

Mark & Juanita

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

27/11/2003 6:04 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Brian Henderson wrote:
>
> > Since the net has been open to the general public then. You're right,
> > when I first got access to Usenet back in '86, it wasn't like this,
> > but there weren't that many of us out there either. Far too many
>
> Right indeed. Not that many of us here, and traffic volume was a tiny
> fraction of what it is today. I used to use rn to read news, because
> that's what my university had installed. I had to go through newsgroups
> reading the articles sequentially. It sucked then, but it would *really*
> suck now.
>
> > people point to the 'good old days' just a couple years ago and seem
> > to have very selective memories.
>
> Oh, don't get me wrong. The good old days weren't that good in some ways.
> We didn't have spammers, but we didn't have the web either. Everybody was
> also much less relaxed in those days. There was still a military air
> hanging about the place.
>
>

I'd always taken it as more of a university climate, anti-anything-
even-remotely-resembling-commercial air.

bR

[email protected] (Robert Bonomi)

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

25/11/2003 9:16 AM

In article <[email protected]>,
Bay Area Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
>There were approximately 11 MILLION messages posted in the last 30 days.
> How does that square with your ISP's comments? IT DOESN'T!! Perhaps
>they are shirking their duties as "providers" with less than stellar
>support of the NG's.
>
>dave

*snork* 11 million messages in 30 days is a drop in the bucket. A *full*
newsfeed these days (circa 45,000 newsgroups) requires most of the bandwidth
of a dedicated T-3 circuit, 24 hrs/day. That is 45 mbit/sec, or 9 Mbyte/sec.
The full feed is probably only about 600 *GIGABYTES* of traffic _per_day_.

Well over 90% of that traffic is in the 'alt.binaries.*' hierarchy -- the
vast majority of which is "dirty pictures", stolen computer software, etc.
5-10 _million_ MESSAGES PER DAY, *just* in 'alt.binaries.*' hierarchy, is
probably realistic, And _at_least_as_many_more_ for the rest of USENET.



Those who do 'know about' USENET tend to use it fairly heavily. Those who
"don't know" about it, _don't_use_it_ (oddly enough! :)

Those who "don't know" outnumber those who "do know", by a ratio that is
probably 'in the _thousands_' to one, if not higher.

Statistic: My provider has around a million customers. at _peak_times_
there are a couple of _hundred_ connections active to the news server.
in the middle of the night, that number is around a -dozen-.




>
>Tom Watson wrote:
>
>> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
>> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>>
>> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
>> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
>> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
>> as though they couldn't be bothered.
>>
>> This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
>> subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
>> condition.
>>
>> When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
>> active groups.
>>
>> Why this attitude by the ISP's?
>>
>> I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
>> ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
>> but is often down.
>>
>> However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
>> when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
>> their system does not pick up the posts.
>>
>> I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
>> of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
>> on Google.
>>
>> What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
>> claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
>> what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
>>
>>
>> Regards, Tom
>> Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
>> Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
>> http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson
>

TW

Tom Watson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 2:13 AM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 21:13:08 -0500, "solarman"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Board Watch Magazine... It has been sold a bunch of times since he had it... Dang! I had that name on the tip of my tongue too. I'll see if I can dig up an old copy from the archives and see what his name is...
>


Jack Rickard?




Regards, Tom
Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 11:58 PM

The format of UseNet is what is so attractive to me ... I just like using my
e-mail client to participate and never cared a tinker's damn for web based
forums.

However, I participated in an e-book forum for a number of years using a
list server and it was almost like being on UseNet, as the _comfort_ of your
e-mail client was preserved.

I would not be adverse to trying it again.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 9/21/03

"George M. Kazaka" wrote in message
> I am on a listserv for cancer support and there is generally never a
problam
> there subscribers from all over the world.
> There are many other listserv's some moderated and some not.
> Anyone starts screwing around on them and they pull the plug.
> There are arguments of course but not flame wars.
> The guy that runs it ask for donations to help defray his costs once a
year
> and he usually gets enough donations to run longer than the year.
> When I came on here i actually joined a woodwork listserv, I was getting
all
> the e-mails from this group but when i posted no one got them, I never
found
> out where they went
> I still do not understand how this newsgroup goes to the listserv but it
is
> based in Indianna.
>
> Some of you Computer Gurus should look into it
> George

Ba

B a r r y B u r k e J r .

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 11:30 PM

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:27:17 -0800, [email protected] wrote:


>Shut off your firewall and popup killers and see what happens to the great
>unwashed when they are foolish enough to attempt to find free clipart via the
>web.
>Besides the popups, so much spy ware is installed it grinds systems to almost a
>standstill.

That's exactly the point! <G>

To me, using a computer without proper firewall / spyware / pop-up
killer / antivirus protection is like trying to rip lumber on a
fenceless tablesaw.

You may be able to do it for a while, but sooner or later, it's going
to cause problems. <G>

Barry

BH

Brian Henderson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 6:34 AM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 01:19:47 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I hate web forums. For one thing, you have to either type in an editor and
>then copy/paste onto the form, or else use the crappy editor built into the
>form. That's probably my #1 reason for hating all such things web-based.

I don't mind some web forums, I am active in a couple, but for the
most part, web forums are very slow moving and you're right, some have
very heavy handed moderation. I've dropped out of at least one major
forum because the moderators simply started ending threads and
deleting posts they didn't personally agree with.

>Personally, I hate moderation. I wouldn't live in a gated community, or one
>where there was a homeowner's association either. One of my neighbors lets
>his grass grow so high he has to bush hog it every second year, but so the
>hell what? I don't get to tell him to mow it, and he doesn't get to tell
>me what color I can paint my shed, or how large my mailbox is allowed to
>be. Suits me just fine.

When we were looking at houses, the #1 requirement was no HOAs. I
don't want anyone telling me what to do with my house, I don't want
them telling me what I can and can't post either, within reason. I
think you have to have some kind of moderation or means of
self-moderating the forum, just to deal with the spam and trolls. I'd
personally rather do it myself, but so long as actual on-topic content
isn't disturbed, I'm content with almost anything.

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 2:39 PM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:15:45 -0500, "Wayne SIKORSKI" <[email protected]> wrote:


>
>The "Techs" from SNiP have said the same thing to me many times, I am one of
>the "few" usenet users on their system.
>
>The Voicenet server seems to be working better than when they attempted to
>host their own servers. I currently use a free news server out of Berlin,
>Germany. They are strictly a text server and do not carry binary newsgroups.
>http://news.cis.dfn.de/
>
Free binary server right here.
All the free porn downloads you want.<g>
http://www.readfreenews.net/biggulp-faq.html

MB

Michael Baglio @nc.rr.com>

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:08 AM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:22:07 -0500, "solarman"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>You know Tom, you might be on to something good here. What is to say all of us here could NOT put up a private news server on the net for woodworking related posts? Then have a registration phase that everyone could go through to keep the riff raff out? I know Yahoo has the groups as does many others, but perhaps we could talk Jason into doing it as he hosts the space for us at www.wood-workers.com anyway... Might be worth looking into even if a small fee were involved. That makes folks tend to take better care of it anyway.

Yo, Solarman:

Since you're smart and stuff about this internet thing, you think you
could figure out how to set your newsreader's word wrap? :)

Whiplash Mike

LA

Lawrence A. Ramsey

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 4:19 PM

Tom, I read it many times a day so I am a frequent user also. I have
noticed that MNAY other groups are basically dead. Maybe the victims
of too much spam, too much hate, too many ????




On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 21:26:57 GMT, Tom Watson
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
>that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
>My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
>complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
>their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
>as though they couldn't be bothered.
>
>This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
>subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
>condition.
>
>When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
>active groups.
>
>Why this attitude by the ISP's?
>
>I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
>ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
>but is often down.
>
>However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
>when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
>their system does not pick up the posts.
>
>I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
>of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
>on Google.
>
>What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
>claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
>what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
>
>
>Regards, Tom
>Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
>Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
>http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 10:03 AM

Brian Henderson wrote:

> It's no different today than it's always been. It'd been over a

That's not really true. Back before the doors were opened to the public at
large, spammers got kicked off the net after just one or two
transgressions. When the net was purely for academic purposes, anything
smacking of commercialism was dealt with swiftly, and with a very heavy
hand. We hadn't even invented the term "spam" yet, I don't think. No one
had ever seen a top post either.

OTOH, the revolution got me back online, so I can't complain too loudly.
Plus now that the web has matured, there's a lot of stuff out there that
just wasn't around a decade ago. Kids today have it easy when it comes to
doing research. Want to know about the JPL? Go to their web site...

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Cc

"CW"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 6:08 AM

You got lucky with the bank. I've been with one for 23 years. They've
changed names 4 times.

"Silvan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Larry Jaques wrote:
>
> > Switch ISPs, then stick with a good one.
>
> I'll agree to that last point in particular. I've seen'em come, and I've
> seen'em go. Dad changes ISPs more often than I change shoes, always
trying
> to find the best deal. I've had the same ISP for 10 years.
>
> One reason I haven't taken the plunge into cable is because I'd not only
be
> paying way more than seems reasonable, but I'd also be trading my dead
> reliable local provider for a big name conglomerate that isn't even sure
if
> it will ever emerge from bankruptcy.
>
> Hell, I do banking the same way. My bank doesn't do ATMs or debit cards
or
> any of that other fancy shit, but I've been dealing with the same bank for
> 15 years. Just about every other bank in town has been bought by some
> national conglomerate in that time.
>
> --
> Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
> http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/
>

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 12:54 AM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 13:46:44 GMT, "George Gibeau"
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>Tom,
>
>I teach in the Networking Technologies department at the local community
>college - this semester I am teaching 3 sections of an Intro to Networking
-snip-
>shocked to see no one was using this great resource. (But then again, most
>of these kids don't even know how to get around in DOS ;-))

I remember teaching the local Marines how NOT to use
WordimPerfect to edit their config.sys and autoexec.bat
files. Hell, I remember back when an operating system
fit on a single-sided 5-1/4" floppy. (Dad's Kaypro w/ CPM)
Ask your kids about those for a laugh. ;)

Usenet is the second (if not top) most valuable resource on
the Internet. Search Engines and their access are top. But
if you need a question about ANYTHING answered in a matter
of minutes, Usenet comes through every time. And most of the
answers are somewhat right, too! =:0


-------------------------------------------
Stain and Poly are their own punishment
http://diversify.com Comprehensive Website Design
======================================================

cC

[email protected] (Charlie Self)

in reply to Larry Jaques on 24/11/2003 12:54 AM

24/11/2003 1:03 AM

Larry Jaques writes:

>-snip-
>>shocked to see no one was using this great resource. (But then again, most
>>of these kids don't even know how to get around in DOS ;-))
>
>I remember teaching the local Marines how NOT to use
>WordimPerfect to edit their config.sys and autoexec.bat
>files. Hell, I remember back when an operating system
>fit on a single-sided 5-1/4" floppy. (Dad's Kaypro w/ CPM)
>Ask your kids about those for a laugh. ;)

Dad's KayPro? Had my own KayPro, thanks. Loved that thing, but didn't love
WordPerfect on it, so I used WordStar, after I had trouble with Perfect Writer.
Both just about totally vanished from ANY scene now.

Charlie Self

"Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog. Few people are interested and the
frog dies of it." E. B. White

















Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 1:12 AM

Larry Blanchard wrote:

>> Same deal with the University of Berlin server I was talking about a bit

> Correct. It is the same server. Great free newsfeed of non-binary
> groups.

Makes me feel a little guilty every time I hear how broke Germany is though.
Why are the German taxpayers paying for me to have a free news server? I
don't get it.

It's not like they don't know who and where I am though.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 10:18 AM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 03:01:38 GMT, john carlson <collector [email protected]>
wrote:

>On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:29:29 GMT, Nova <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>My next door neighbor works "network tech support" (internal to the
>>company) for Adelphia Cable. Prior to me showing him what "UseNet" was,
>>he didn't even know it existed. I suspect it is the same with many of the
>>"kids" working for various ISP's.
>
>More to the point, it's true of the vast majority of Internet users
>today. So as far as the ISPs are concerned, Usenet is not something
>that very many subscribers care about, and not something that's worth
>putting much time or money into.
>
>My ISP has a pretty crappy news server. Often down, slow, lots of
>missing messages, minuscule retention times.

Then why use it?
There are terrific free servers out there with long retention and almost
never down'
I can point you to a terrific one in Germany if you want an excellent free
news server.


>There are a couple of
>on-line forums where the ISP has an official or at least semi-official
>presence and when users complain about the news service, their
>response is that they're tryin' but realistically, there's only so
>much priority that they can give to a service that's used by perhaps
>5-10% of their subscribers.
>
>
>-- jc
>Published e-mail address is strictly for spam collection.
>If e-mailing me, please use jc631 at optonline dot net

BH

Brian Henderson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 6:40 AM

On 23 Nov 2003 10:32:38 -0800, [email protected] (edfan) wrote:

>I think so many newsgroups have been taken over by spammers and
>hatemongers, it's tough to waste so much time wading through the muck.
>This newsgroup has been better than average but there are dozens of
>others that have succumbed. Everywhere you go, it's porn, spam, get
>rich quick schemes, JUNK. It's not hard to understand why users have
>been leaving in droves.

It's no different today than it's always been. It'd been over a
decade since I just downloaded everything in any Usenet group. I pull
headers and download only those threads that I want to read. I rarely
ever see spam because it's obvious in the subject. Spam never gets
pulled.

It saves me time and frustration and is simple to do. Why everyone
doesn't do the same thing, I don't know.

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 8:27 AM

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:53:28 GMT, B a r r y B u r k e J r .
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:18:18 -0500, Silvan
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>I haven't seen a popup in years,
>
>Neither have I, _with_ windows. <G>
>
Well goo for you.:)
Neither have I, that wasn't my point.
Shut off your firewall and popup killers and see what happens to the great
unwashed when they are foolish enough to attempt to find free clipart via the
web.
Besides the popups, so much spy ware is installed it grinds systems to almost a
standstill.

>Zone Alarm and the Google tool bar as a team do a wonderful job of
>canning pop-ups.
>
>Barry

DB

"David Babcock"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:49 AM

Unfortunately the first response is pretty valid. Having been in the IT
field for over 25 years and having worked for a few ISP's, I can say most
ISP's don't want to expend the capital to support a small client base. The
younger people, and a lot of uniformed people use chat rooms for similar
information sharing (among other uses) Guess we're just dinosaurs........and
I remember dialing into a BBS (bulletin board service) ........so there
won't be any guessing what BBS means!

Dave

"Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> as though they couldn't be bothered.
>
> This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
> subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
> condition.
>
> When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
> active groups.
>
> Why this attitude by the ISP's?
>
> I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
> ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
> but is often down.
>
> However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
> when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
> their system does not pick up the posts.
>
> I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
> of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
> on Google.
>
> What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
> claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
> what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
>
>
> Regards, Tom
> Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
> Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
> http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 11:37 AM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 19:04:50 GMT, "Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:

>The first Adventure game I saw was even before the TI-994A, on a mainframe
>in college, so the TI 99/4a added fuel to a fire that was already burning:
>
Infocom?
I have most of these for the TI as well.
I loved these game although it was frustrating to come up with the correct key
phrases.
You can still buy these games BTW.

>"You are on a beach as the sun rises to light the day. To your North, along
>the water's edge as the morning tide recedes, is what appears to be the
>mouth of a cave . At your feet is a bag of flares, an axe, a map, and a
>knife. You can only carry three of these items. Grab axe ... "Can't 'grab'".
>Take axe. To the South is a ......."
>
>I sold my 99/4a for $250 at a garage sale in the late 80's, including the GE
>Cassette "hard drive". It was fully functional. May regret doing that one of
>these days. Learned the intricacies of assembly language, and Introduced my
>first daughter to the computing world with the kid's OS, "Turtle".
>
I was the #1 player in the world at Munchman for 2 months.<g>

>... how time flies. Time to start using a calendar instead of a watch.

You've got that right!

lL

[email protected] (Lawrence Wasserman)

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 6:48 PM

I think the ISPs in some cases just don't want to be bothered with
usenet. I haven't seen any figures but I'd be surprised if there were
not more newsgroups and people reading news than ever before.




--

Larry Wasserman Baltimore, Maryland
[email protected]

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 1:07 AM

George wrote:

> No, I mean kids. The high-schoolers who, according to popular notions
> have to teach their elders how to use technology, but in reality know only
> GUIs, and in some cases don't even realize that the toolbars are common
> across many programs, but instead keep bashing about, locking up machines.

Oh, OK then. I'll agree with you there then. These whippersnappers have no
idea how to do anything if they can't pointy clicky it. They're all
completely insulated from the underlying technology, and have no idea how
anything works.

It's a whole different world now. I worked on my boss's daughter's
computer. When I took it over to his house to set it back up, she was
there with a bunch of her little teenie bopper friends. They were tripping
over themselves with excitement at the prospect of her getting her computer
back, so they could chat again.

Teenage girls getting excited about a *computer*? O_o

I was born 20 years too soon. Back when I was that age, I was getting
beaten up for being a computer nerd.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

DF

Dave Fleming <>

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 3:55 PM

>I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
>that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
>My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
>complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
>their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
>as though they couldn't be bothered.
<snip>
I sometime back, just said the hell with it dealing with the ISP's
version of a USENET connection and signed up with Giganews. I dunno
offhand how much Gigabytes I can download per month but I doubt if I
come close and it runs about $11 and change per month.
No worries about missing one of Larry J's 'poils of wisdom' for me.
:-))

Said with tongue firmly in cheek. Folla?
Tales of a Boatbuilder Apprentice
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/djf3rd/

MD

"Michael Daly"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

25/11/2003 4:44 PM

On 25-Nov-2003, [email protected] (Robert Bonomi) wrote:

> The full feed is probably only about 600 *GIGABYTES* of traffic _per_day_.

I distinctly remember when a local sysop was complaining that if Usenet
continued to grow, he'd have to upgrade to a 20MB drive to contain it.
That was an $800 upgrade for a clone!

Mike

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 10:58 AM

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:48:50 GMT, [email protected] (Lawrence
Wasserman) wrote:

>I think the ISPs in some cases just don't want to be bothered with
>usenet. I haven't seen any figures but I'd be surprised if there were
>not more newsgroups and people reading news than ever before.
>
There are more people reading usenet. But there are a hell of a lot more people
on the net as well.
The percentage of their total customer base using Usenet has dropped from around
10% to in most cases well under 5%.
Usenet customers are generally heavy bandwidth users as well.
Several ISPs are already trying to block their customers access to
www.easynews.com for this very reason.
Usenet users also generate complaints completely out of proportion to their
numbers.

Usenet is not a winner for ANY ISP these days.

jc

john carlson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 2:12 AM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 10:18:22 -0800, [email protected] wrote:

>There are terrific free servers out there with long retention and almost
>never down'
>I can point you to a terrific one in Germany if you want an excellent free
>news server.


Please do.
-- jc
Published e-mail address is strictly for spam collection.
If e-mailing me, please use jc631 at optonline dot net

Ba

B a r r y B u r k e J r .

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 11:53 AM

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:18:18 -0500, Silvan
<[email protected]> wrote:


>I haven't seen a popup in years,

Neither have I, _with_ windows. <G>

Zone Alarm and the Google tool bar as a team do a wonderful job of
canning pop-ups.

Barry

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

25/11/2003 12:57 AM

B a r r y B u r k e J r . wrote:

> killer / antivirus protection is like trying to rip lumber on a
> fenceless tablesaw.
>
> You may be able to do it for a while, but sooner or later, it's going
> to cause problems. <G>

Yeah, don't ever try that either... I was in a hurry, didn't need a
precise cut... WHAM. At least I wasn't standing in front of it.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 10:23 AM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:32:43 -0500, "Lee K" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
>> claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
>> what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
>>
>
>Try this site:
>http://news.individual.net/
>
>It's a usenet server based in Germany that is very reliable, fast, and free.
>You can still keep your current access via your ISP and use this as a
>back-up, or, do as I do and use it all the time, since it is much more
>reliable than most ISP access is.
>
Yep, they don't get much better than this one.
In 4 years I have seen it down only 3 times and then for less than a day.
Anyone who has a crappy news server should sing up for this one.
I can't recall a single post from this group that wasn't spam missing from
this server.

J

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 6:39 PM

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 02:12:00 GMT, john carlson <collector [email protected]> wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 10:18:22 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>There are terrific free servers out there with long retention and almost
>>never down'
>>I can point you to a terrific one in Germany if you want an excellent free
>>news server.
>
>
>Please do.
text
http://news.individual.net/

binaries
http://www.readfreenews.net/biggulp-faq.html

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 10:28 PM

Swingman wrote:

> AAMOF, it is getting so bad that I sometimes fancy you may eventually see
> some of the older, pre-Internet networks, like FidoNet, rear their heads
> again.

AFAIK, FidoNet never died. Don't quote me on that, but I think it's still
around after some fashion.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

GM

"George M. Kazaka"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 4:52 PM

I am on a listserv for cancer support and there is generally never a problam
there subscribers from all over the world.
There are many other listserv's some moderated and some not.
Anyone starts screwing around on them and they pull the plug.
There are arguments of course but not flame wars.
The guy that runs it ask for donations to help defray his costs once a year
and he usually gets enough donations to run longer than the year.
When I came on here i actually joined a woodwork listserv, I was getting all
the e-mails from this group but when i posted no one got them, I never found
out where they went
I still do not understand how this newsgroup goes to the listserv but it is
based in Indianna.

Some of you Computer Gurus should look into it
George

"solarman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> You know Tom, you might be on to something good here. What is to say all
of us here could NOT put up a private news server on the net for woodworking
related posts? Then have a registration phase that everyone could go through
to keep the riff raff out? I know Yahoo has the groups as does many others,
but perhaps we could talk Jason into doing it as he hosts the space for us
at www.wood-workers.com anyway... Might be worth looking into even if a
small fee were involved. That makes folks tend to take better care of it
anyway.
>
>
>
> "Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> > that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
> >
> > My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> > complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> > their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> > as though they couldn't be bothered.
> >
> > This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
> > subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
> > condition.
> >
> > When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
> > active groups.
> >
> > Why this attitude by the ISP's?
> >
> > I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
> > ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
> > but is often down.
> >
> > However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
> > when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
> > their system does not pick up the posts.
> >
> > I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
> > of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
> > on Google.
> >
> > What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
> > claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
> > what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
> >
> >
> > Regards, Tom
> > Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
> > Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
> > http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

BA

Bay Area Dave

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 12:20 AM

There were approximately 11 MILLION messages posted in the last 30 days.
How does that square with your ISP's comments? IT DOESN'T!! Perhaps
they are shirking their duties as "providers" with less than stellar
support of the NG's.

dave

Tom Watson wrote:

> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> as though they couldn't be bothered.
>
> This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
> subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
> condition.
>
> When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
> active groups.
>
> Why this attitude by the ISP's?
>
> I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
> ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
> but is often down.
>
> However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
> when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
> their system does not pick up the posts.
>
> I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
> of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
> on Google.
>
> What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
> claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
> what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
>
>
> Regards, Tom
> Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
> Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
> http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

26/11/2003 9:47 PM

Brian Henderson wrote:

> Since the net has been open to the general public then. You're right,
> when I first got access to Usenet back in '86, it wasn't like this,
> but there weren't that many of us out there either. Far too many

Right indeed. Not that many of us here, and traffic volume was a tiny
fraction of what it is today. I used to use rn to read news, because
that's what my university had installed. I had to go through newsgroups
reading the articles sequentially. It sucked then, but it would *really*
suck now.

> people point to the 'good old days' just a couple years ago and seem
> to have very selective memories.

Oh, don't get me wrong. The good old days weren't that good in some ways.
We didn't have spammers, but we didn't have the web either. Everybody was
also much less relaxed in those days. There was still a military air
hanging about the place.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

Sd

Silvan

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 10:18 PM

Mark Jerde wrote:

> One bummer:
>
> http://news.individual.net/faq.html#5.3
>
> 5.3 May I mangle my "From:" header address so that I do not get SPAM?

Same deal with the University of Berlin server I was talking about a bit
ago. That sounds like maybe the same thing by a different name. (Maybe
they've changed the name.)

That one in particular is what I had in mind when I said "very reasonable
rules."

I've been on usenet for 10 years now, and I have never used a fake address.
Right choice for me, and no, I'm not preaching, but abiding by that rule
has never bothered me.

They *will* dump you if they catch you breaking that rule. I think they'll
warn you first.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[email protected]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/

RS

Roy Smith

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 7:18 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is not UseNet that is dying, it is the technical competence required to
> run an ISP, with all the attendant services like nntp, that has become a
> victim of the general corporate incompetence in this country.

If you're looking for an ISP run by people who know what they're doing
and enjoy working with sophisticated customers, try Panix.

jc

john carlson

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 3:01 AM

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:29:29 GMT, Nova <[email protected]>
wrote:
>My next door neighbor works "network tech support" (internal to the
>company) for Adelphia Cable. Prior to me showing him what "UseNet" was,
>he didn't even know it existed. I suspect it is the same with many of the
>"kids" working for various ISP's.

More to the point, it's true of the vast majority of Internet users
today. So as far as the ISPs are concerned, Usenet is not something
that very many subscribers care about, and not something that's worth
putting much time or money into.

My ISP has a pretty crappy news server. Often down, slow, lots of
missing messages, minuscule retention times. There are a couple of
on-line forums where the ISP has an official or at least semi-official
presence and when users complain about the news service, their
response is that they're tryin' but realistically, there's only so
much priority that they can give to a service that's used by perhaps
5-10% of their subscribers.


-- jc
Published e-mail address is strictly for spam collection.
If e-mailing me, please use jc631 at optonline dot net

ss

"solarman"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 9:27 PM
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Pn

Phisherman

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 8:07 PM

On 23 Nov 2003 10:32:38 -0800, [email protected] (edfan) wrote:

>Tom Watson <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
>> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
>> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>>
>> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
>> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
>> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
>> as though they couldn't be bothered.
>
>I think so many newsgroups have been taken over by spammers and
>hatemongers, it's tough to waste so much time wading through the muck.
>This newsgroup has been better than average but there are dozens of
>others that have succumbed. Everywhere you go, it's porn, spam, get
>rich quick schemes, JUNK. It's not hard to understand why users have
>been leaving in droves.
>
>There are serious implications if this continues in the trend
>direction. Not one newsgroup in my memory has ever recovered once it
>was thoroughly spammed for more than a month or two. Some newsgroups
>have been taken over by the folks who spammed it to death. Maybe
>that's cheaper than starting up a new group.


Actually Internet use is on the decline due to all the annoyances,
ads, vermit and such. But the internet is certainly here to stay.

LJ

Larry Jaques

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 12:55 AM

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 14:31:02 GMT, Tom Watson
<[email protected]> brought forth from the murky depths:

>On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 03:51:48 GMT, Larry Jaques <jake@di\/ersify.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>>That's absolutely false. Hell, you _alone_ have responded to
>>at least 50 trolls on this group this month. Your 1/2 dozen
>>troll-responding buddies did the same. <glare>
>
>Why would anyone ask for a moderated forum when we have you, Larry?

And sit up straight, boy. What a posture!


-------------------------------------------
Stain and Poly are their own punishment
http://diversify.com Comprehensive Website Design
======================================================

BA

Bay Area Dave

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

24/11/2003 3:04 AM

Will there be a disturbance in the force if I agree with you, Tom??

dave

Tom Watson wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 03:51:48 GMT, Larry Jaques <jake@di\/ersify.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>That's absolutely false. Hell, you _alone_ have responded to
>>at least 50 trolls on this group this month. Your 1/2 dozen
>>troll-responding buddies did the same. <glare>
>
>
> Why would anyone ask for a moderated forum when we have you, Larry?
>
>
> Regards, Tom
> Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
> Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
> http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

MR

Mark

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 8:12 AM



Keith Carlson wrote:

>
>
> I wonder how many don't care for web forums? One big advantage would be to
> have a moderated forum. Be able to block random posters by requiring
> registration, and being able to step in when a thread gets out of hand.


I'm on a very active Web forum. StangNet.com

For me the most attractive part of the forum system use to be the
ability to edit a post.

I started when the EDU account would only run mail and usenet. A browser
could be made to work with a bit of effort. Wasn't worth it on a 286.
Had a Compuserve account when it meant something.

Got a better computer, found a mail list I'm still a member of. Other
lists came and went. Found some forums. Only go to 2 or 3.

And I'm back on Usenet. Something about plane text and links that's elegant.

No Dancing Cars rims and tires. Though mail programs have these ;)
damned things in them.

I think news groups can be easier to read. Definitely easier to archive.


--

Mark

N.E. Ohio


Never argue with a fool, a bystander can't tell you apart. (S. Clemens,
A.K.A. Mark Twain)

When in doubt hit the throttle. It may not help but it sure ends the
suspense. (Gaz, r.moto)

GG

"George Gibeau"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

23/11/2003 1:46 PM

Tom,

I teach in the Networking Technologies department at the local community
college - this semester I am teaching 3 sections of an Intro to Networking
Basics course - just last week I was teaching a section on TCP/IP and its
related sub-protocols - and as part of that lecture I was talking about
NNTP - in all 3 classes I asked who knew what NNTP was - I got 50+ blank
stares over the course of the day. Having explained what NNTP is, I then
asked who used Newsgroups - and again got the blank 1000 yard stare. Man
did I feel old - especially when I explained to them that you used to get
your news by telnetting into a mainframe and just typing News ;-). I then
took about 15 minutes and gave them a brief demo of at least reading news
with Google as well as setting up Outlook Express (and talking about
dedicated newsreaders). Not sure how many converts I made, but I was
shocked to see no one was using this great resource. (But then again, most
of these kids don't even know how to get around in DOS ;-))

-George-


"Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> as though they couldn't be bothered.
>
> This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
> subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
> condition.
>
> When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
> active groups.
>
> Why this attitude by the ISP's?
>
> I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
> ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
> but is often down.
>
> However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
> when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
> their system does not pick up the posts.
>
> I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
> of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
> on Google.
>
> What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
> claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
> what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
>
>
> Regards, Tom
> Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
> Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
> http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

GO

"Greg O"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 4:53 PM


"CW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:xFRvb.210817$ao4.750180@attbi_s51...
> The vast majority of people that I talk to have never heard of Usenet.
>
>\
When I think of it I do not know of one other personal friend that uses
usenet. Most all have internet, they just have not discovered usenet.
Greg

tt

tom

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 9:08 PM

It depends on the ISP's implementation of the usenet/newsgroup
protocols. If the ISP is trying to run news servers the update and
transmission can be a major problem, Some of the Midsized and smaller
ISP's use a passthru service. Supernews is both a usenet repository,and
a ISP passthru provider. I believe Google also provides the service but
is not as fast on posts. It takes less technical knowledge to provide
passthru service, Just a couple of entries in the DNS. To figure out if
your ISP is providing passthru or local news service do a "Ping" on the
newsserver name. It will show if the server is inhouse or a passthru.
in Tom's case it seems they are trying to run it in house.

Tom

Tom Watson wrote:
> I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
>
> My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> as though they couldn't be bothered.
>
> This newsgroup, in particular, seems to be vibrant and well
> subscribed. The chess newgroups that I lurk on seem to be in the same
> condition.
>
> When I look at the Netscan statistics, I see signs that there are many
> active groups.
>
> Why this attitude by the ISP's?
>
> I use two newsgroup providers, TeraNews being my backup, because my
> ISP's provider is often out of whack. TeraNews is fine for a backup
> but is often down.
>
> However, I've had complaints from some that they don't see my posts
> when they come through my ISP's provider (Voicenet, I believe) because
> their system does not pick up the posts.
>
> I've tried reading the group through Google but it seems to have a lot
> of lag time between the time that posts are made and when they show up
> on Google.
>
> What is going on with this Usenet thing? Are the ISP's right in
> claiming that Usenet is dying? And, given that the ISP's don't care,
> what is the most reliable way to read and post on Usenet?
>
>
> Regards, Tom
> Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker
> Gulph Mills, Pennsylvania
> http://users.snip.net/~tjwatson

Cc

"CW"

in reply to Tom Watson on 22/11/2003 9:26 PM

22/11/2003 10:44 PM

The vast majority of people that I talk to have never heard of Usenet.

"Nova" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Tom Watson wrote:
>
> > I read someone's comment the other day about how their ISP claimed
> > that "no one uses newsgroups anymore."
> >
> > My own ISP has made the same comment to me when I've called to
> > complain about inadequate Newsgroup service. They seem to feel that
> > their customer base uses Usenet in only a marginal fashion. They act
> > as though they couldn't be bothered.
>
> <snip>
>
> My next door neighbor works "network tech support" (internal to the
> company) for Adelphia Cable. Prior to me showing him what "UseNet" was,
> he didn't even know it existed. I suspect it is the same with many of the
> "kids" working for various ISP's.
>
> --
> Jack Novak
> Buffalo, NY - USA
> (Remove "SPAM" from email address to reply)
>
>


You’ve reached the end of replies